Pricing errors are not cleared after fixing the master data

Hi All,
Kindly go through the issue explained below.
Pricing is determined properly in transaction level(Oppt) when the master data is correct. cool.
System shows pricing error (Mandatory condition 0PR0 is missing, Pricing could not be determined) when price(condition record) is not maintained in product. This is also fine. Now the issue is, Pricing errors are not going away from Opportunity even after the master data(product) fixed with maintaining pricing.
Scenario : Opportunity is saved with pricing errors.
Analysis : Price or/and Sales area are not maintained in Product that is maintained in Oppt. That is why this error occurs. So, we have maintained the Sales area/Price(condition record) in product. Now master data is corrected.
Expected result: After maintaining the price/sales area in product, the errors should go off from the created Opportunities and pricing should be determined properly.
Actual result: When we create a new opportunity with the same product, pricing is determined. But the errors are not going away from the already created opportunity transactions.
Please let me know if this scenario is not clear to understand.
Please help with your inputs. Thank you for your time.
Regards,
Maddy

Hi Luis,
Thank you very much for your reply. Could you please help me where is the button 'Redermine Pricing' available? I have checked in Opportunity transaction but failed.
Regards,
Maddy

Similar Messages

Invoice outputs are not printing after saving the document..!

Invoice outputs are not printing after saving the document. Eventhough we maintain all condition records not only that Processing log also it showed that it has been processed on some date. but customer not received the printout
Amar

hI,
GO TO IMG, SD, BF, OUTPUT CONTROL, OUTPUT TYPES, SELECT UR OUTPUT TYPE, GO TO DETAILS ICON AND ASSIGN THE VALUE "ISSUE OUTPUT IMMEDIATELY SAVING THE APPLICATION" FROM DROP DOWN DOWN LIST IN THE DEFAULT VALUES
AND ASSIGN THE RELEVENT PRINTER TO USER ID IN SU01 AND IN CONDITION RECORDS
REGARDS,
SK
Edited by: Sadanandam Kasarla on Mar 16, 2009 12:07 PM
Edited by: Sadanandam Kasarla on Mar 16, 2009 12:08 PM
Edited by: Sadanandam Kasarla on Mar 16, 2009 12:10 PM

SAP Webdispatcher :Images are not displayed after using the URL filtering

Hello,
I have installed the SAP webdispatcher 7.3 on Linux redhat 5.4 in front of the Portal 7.3.
I wanted to restrict the access just for the IRJ prefix so for this i used the parameter wdisp/permission_table = PermFile
with Permfile as follows:
#Denial of the useradmin URL from the WebDispatcher
P /irj*
P /irj/*
The filtering is working well except that for IRJ the images are not displayed so i was using so i added the following line to disply the images to the logon page
icm/HTTP/auth_
P /logon_ui_resources/*
P /logon_ui_resources*
but i still have the same issue for the irj page where no icons are displayed and i can do nothing.
The same issue also happened when using the icm/HTTP/auth_xx
Do you have an idea how to deal with this issue?
Thanks in advance;
Hassan

Hello,
After checking the HTTP code of the irj page on IE, i foud the needed URL to permit so i modified the permision table and it works fine for the moement
P /irj*
P /irj/*
P /logon_ui_resources/*
P /logon_ui_resources*
P /AFPServlet/*
P /AFPServlet*
P /com.sap*
P /com.sap/*
P /webdynpro/resources*
P /webdynpro/resources/*
Thanks for you help,
Hassan

Approvers are not displaying after Saving the SC and re opening SRM 7.0 PCW

Hi All,
We have implemented PCW SRM7.0 SC workflow, where we have implemented to ES - /SAPSRM/BD_WF_PROCESS & /SAPSRM/BD_WF_AGENTS ....
When we are saving any SC and re opening it further then it is not determining any approvers. when I debugged then found that Agents badi implementations are not getting triggered n Due to it no agents are showing up..
Can any one suggest any inputs on this.
Thanks
Devraj

Hello Nevaeen;
Thank you for the comments. The problem was a erratic logic in a Z level of approval.
Here is what I done:
My requirement was to validate the total value of each line item of the SC and trigger a second step of approval if it exceeded a predefined amount. As you mentioned, the standard BRF's only consider total value of the SC and not the value per line item. I copied the Badi implementation of RR_MANAGER_OF_MANAGER as well since we needed the approver to be the manager of the previous approver level and in the method GET_AREA_TO ITEM_MAP I worked up the logic we needed. For the first level of approver additionally of the mentioned method i had to re-write the method get_responsible_approvers of a Z class ZCL_WF_AREA_MANAGER (Copy of /SAPSRM/CL_WF_AREA_MANAGER) to get the approver information of the ECC system and in the method GET_AREA_TO ITEM_MAP i split the area of responsibility according to the account assignment ( so it was 1 badi implementation for each level of approval).
Kind regards
Cristian R.

Why we are not using "Message Control" for Master data ?

Hi friends,
We are using Message control as output determination for Transactional data, what is the main reason for not using the msg control for Master data.Please explain with details...
I am very thankful to them...
Thanks and Regards.
Naveen Kumar. Chamala

Hi Naveen,
 Listing down those I know -
 1. Master data is expected to be changed/created less frequestly.
 2. Transactional data is expected to be chnaged/created more frequestly.
 3. Transactions to create/change/display master data do no have message control integration, since you are not supposed to print/fax/mail master data to your partners.
 4. Distribution of master data in generally supposed to happen within Enterprise boundry and typically you will have one central server maintaining master data which will be distributed to multiple downstream operation system (Some thing where MDM fits). So ideally when distributing master data using ALE you will be sending it to multiple systems.
 5. Distributing transactional data PO/SO etc is same as sending fax/print which fits with the requirement of message control.
Hope this helps,
Regards,
Sanjeev

Taxes in pricing procedure are not picked up in the simulation for invoice

Hello all
we want to post taxes in pricing procedure in purchase order. but in MIRO Enter Incoming Invoice the system is not picking the taxes as line items in simulation. please let me know any setting missed in this regard.
Thanks in advance
Ramaraju

Hi,
Did you selected the Tax code in MIRO, unless you select how the system will show in the simulation.
Check whether you have assigned the Tax procedure to your Country, did you created the Tax code for your country which you defined. If all the settings are ok then only you will get the Taxes in Simulation of MIRO.
One more thing r u getting any error while doing MIRO related to Taxes. Check & Confirm.
rgds
Chidanand

Changes to Excel link sources are not saved after closing the workbook

We've had several instances over the last few weeks where users are updating the source files for various links within a spreadsheet, saving their changes and closing the file. Then, next time another user goes into the file, the links have reverted back
to their previous values, as if the first user never went in and changed them.
Anyone ever hear of such a thing? The user changing the links is running Excel 2013. The user opening the file for review is using Excel 2010. Could there be some issue there?
Shaun

Hi,
According to your description, let us more test to narrow down this issue.
Firstly, since the three users using different pc to open these file, I recommend the third user logon the other two PC with Excel 2013 to test.
If third user could see the well file with Excel 2013, this issue is more relate to Excel 2010 or the third PC itself.
Secondly, we could use the forth pc with Excel 2010 to test. If third user could see the well file in the forth pc with Excel 2010.
I'd better check the third PC itself. There are some third party add-ins or program will caused it. Try following methods:
Install the Windows and Office 2010 update patches.
Start with Excel safe mode.
If it still not work well with Excel 2010, there might be some compatibility issue between Excel 2010 and Excel 2013. Please try to run
the Compatibility Checker for 2010
Hope it's helpful.
Regards,
George Zhao
Forum Support
Come back and mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help.
If you have any feedback on our support, please click "[email protected]"

Pricing determination not possible after updateing customer master data

Hi Gurus,
We are trying to set up CRM 7.0 standard sales scenario to make it to work. We picked a BP, a sold-to party which was loaded from ECC. Changed the role to sold-to party, and added the sales area data that we have in CRM. Added currency "CAD" to the "billing' tab as well. However, when we create a standard sales order (TA), we picked this BP as sold-to, and also picked the right product, we also made sure the pricing procedure determination config is done. However, system keeps giving the error "item category cannot be determined", and the "currency" and "pricing procedure" fields in the header section remain blank.
It seems to us that system needs some sort of refresh to "see" the new configuration data. Don't know why. I remember in other projects we did, we had to wait overnight to see some pricing/org. data updated.
Can someone advise how to fix it without having to wait till the next day?
Many thanks!
Jerry

About buffer problem - yes, organizational data must be refresh if they are changed. You can clear buffers with /$sync.
About your error "item category cannot be determined", i would say that you are missing the customazing. check settings under spro>crm>transactions>basic settings>define item category determination (and also 3 options before that one).

Labels are not clearly visible on Horizontal Axis

I want to display a full timestamp on the horizontal axis of a LineSeries. But the labels are not clearly visible. The below is the screenshot.
I have already tried using LabelRenderer and set a larger font size and also tried increasing the width of the label itself. But, it didnt work. It seems there is some container for the lable which has fixed width. Does anyone know how to increase this width and make the text clearly visible.
Thanks

Hi Mohd Fayaz,
Have you tried setting the larger fontSize on LineChart.
<mx:LineChart fontSize="18" />
Thanks,
Bhasker

Why some photos are not clear on Facebook?

I have posted some snap clicked from my DSLR on, Facebook. But when I view there! they are not clear.

I have the same problem: I just added an new project to Aperture, but it isn't shown in the list of projects on the AppleTV. Even not in the "Last Week" one ... All other (or even most of them - I cannot count them - it is to much of them ... nicer sorting would be useful) are properly shown in the list...
So it is not a networking problem or so ... Any ideas ?

Problem with the master data restriction

Hi All,
I have a master data 0EMPLOYEE. The requirement is such that we need to restrict the future dated records i.e BEGINNING DATE <= SYSTEM -DATE. This we need to do at the extractor level which was done successfully. Now even after refreshing the master data 0EMPLOYEE in BW, I see the future dated records. May be these are the earlier records which were pulled.
I don't want to see these records in the cube. Obviously I need to put the same logic in cube. But I need to know where should I write this code. I want to know the BEGINING DATE field is assigned to what field in the cube?
Every where the assignment is of type "Master Data Attribute of".
Thanks,
Srinivas

Hi,
after doing at the extractot level,you need to replicate and then activate the DS.
Then run the InfoPackage with repair full req and then run delta DTP. It should solve ur data issue.
For Cube logic,
You need to declare the data declaration and select stmt in start routine and then write the code in indiv level routine.
check which field have u mapped for the masterdata and i think you can use cal day for beginning date but i'm not sure on this.
Wait for other's suggestion.
Cheers,
shana
assign pts if it is useful

Problem with the master data loads

Hi Guys,
I am trying to load 0MATERIAL_ATTR in QA,but it is throwing error(Record 2 :0MATERIAL : Data record 2 ('000000000000000012 '): Version '000000000000000012 ' is not va ) and also similar error is coming when i load for 0VERSION(Record 1 :0VERSION : Data record 1 ('000E '): Version '000 ' is not valid ).
but for the same master data object in development with the same R/3 data the loads are successful,only in QA it is giving the problem.

Hi Abdul,
Check if the data you are getting for the two fields in your data loading are correct. I think it has some illegal characters(I guess it has a trailing space). If possible try and correct it in the source system itself.
If you are doing full load for the master data, everytime the system is going to pull these values in and throw error. One other way of avoiding it will be to maintain routines to eliminate these.
The quickfix will be to correct it at the PSA level and load it again.
Regards.

After system restore ,we are not able to activate the windows,while login to systems getting an error 0x800700B7

after system restore ,we are not able to activate the windows, while login to systems getting an error 0x800700B7
Cont-8096688758

hi Jain,
you may need to check the transfer structures,
right click infosource and 'change', click 'comm.structure'/expand,
click 'transfer', move the 0BASE_UOM from left to right side,
or if you wont use the comm structure anymore, you can right click infosource and 'delete comm structure'
hope this helps.

Error: You are not a receiver of the work item in Leave Request Approval

Hi all,
I have copied the standard leave request workflow and done the customization as per my requirement.
Agent assignment for all the tasks are General Tasks.
We are facing below error when we are trying to approve the leave request from MSS UWL.
"You are not a receiver of the work item.".
This started happening after implementing the note 1501377 which is for clearing the approved leave request
workitems from UWL .
i have gone through the threads related to this issue and tried given solution but no success .
Please let me know if anything else is missing since its happening after implementing the note.
Thanks,
Santosh

Able to resolve the issue :-).
i was using Fork since my workflow is a two level process.
so the workflow was travelling to both branches one was in ready state another was in waiting state(48hours deadline)
having different agents.
i debugged the 1501377 note code when leave is approved it is looking at last workitem of the request which is waiting state workitem in my case and I was trying to approve the leave from user who is in ready state. then it throws the error.
So i have changed the design of workflow. i have done below things for two level process.
i will have requested end for approval task with outcome in that branch i kept second level approver. My questions
1) i am planning to do write below code to post the entries into infotypes after approval by managers. is it ok or any suggestions?
   CALL METHOD cl_pt_arq_processor=>post
      EXPORTING
        im_request =
      RECEIVING
        ret_value = retrun
2) how to complete the WF if the 1st manager misses the deadline and WF goes to second manager?
Please let me know.
Thanks,
Santosh

After update to 11.3.1 users are not logged in to the ZAA

Hi,
we did a update from 11.2.3 to 11.3.1 a few weeks ago. All works fine but there is one problem. A lot of users are not logged in to the ZAA. If i try to start a remote session with the username i get the message the user is not logged in to any device.
If i connect me to the device and look at the ZAA the user is not logged in and i can not log in because i get the error message that the username or password is wrong.
The solution is to go to the registry -> HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Novell\ZCM\ZenLgn\Hist ory\Cache\domain.local and i have to delete the user.
After that the login works fine
Sometimes i have to delete the user in this registry key too -> HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Novell\ZCM\ZenLgn\Hist ory\CachedUserZenNames
Is that a known bug? What can i do to solve that problem?

I would recommend an SR.
You should not have to do that.
There were some similar bugs in the past, but were fixed in 11.2.x and
should not exist in 11.3.x at all.
On 10/15/2014 7:26 AM, SteffenMuch wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> we did a update from 11.2.3 to 11.3.1 a few weeks ago. All works fine
> but there is one problem. A lot of users are not logged in to the ZAA.
> If i try to start a remote session with the username i get the message
> the user is not logged in to any device.
> If i connect me to the device and look at the ZAA the user is not logged
> in and i can not log in because i get the error message that the
> username or password is wrong.
>
> The solution is to go to the registry ->
> HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Novell\ZCM\ZenLgn\Hist ory\Cache\domain.local
> and i have to delete the user.
> After that the login works fine
> Sometimes i have to delete the user in this registry key too ->
> HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Novell\ZCM\ZenLgn\Hist ory\CachedUserZenNames
>
> Is that a known bug? What can i do to solve that problem?
>
>
Going to Brainshare 2014?
http://www.brainshare.com
Use Registration Code "nvlcwilson" for $300 off!
Craig Wilson - MCNE, MCSE, CCNA
Novell Technical Support Engineer
Novell does not officially monitor these forums.
Suggestions/Opinions/Statements made by me are solely my own.
These thoughts may not be shared by either Novell or any rational human.

Pricing errors are not cleared after fixing the master data

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for