Pricing issues in IS-Retail

Hai guys,
ECC 6.0 (IS-Retail)
In the same client we have created two different org structures for demo purpose. The articles created in the first one (say 9000) is working fine in respect to Pricing. The prices we maintain in the various orgn levels in the Article Master is flowing into the SO/PO docs fine. But articles of another another org. in the same client (say 4000) behave differently whereas the prices are not flowing into documents. We have to create individual records for VKP2, AUFS and other condition types to get the documents working.
The IMG settings have been checked again and again and found very similiar to finely working 9000.
Can somebody suggest me where we could have gone wrong?
Regards,
Maheshwaran. I

wrong question

Similar Messages

Pricing issue in sales order

Hi All,
We are facing pricing issue for few sales orders.
The pricing is being carried for line items even though there is valid condition record exist at pricing date of line items .
For example we are creating order on 26.10.2010 and Requested delivery date is 01.01.2011.
The pricing date at line tem is 01.01.2011 and condition record is valid only till 31.12.2010.
Still pricing is carried for line item and it is not for all the sales orders .
So could please advice how to overcome this kind of errors?
Thanks in advance

Hi All,
We are again facing pricing issue in sales order,the pricing date of line item is not in synchronization with the condition record validity date.
Due to that incorrect pricing is being carried out .
But when we do repricing the error is getting fixed.
So could you please let us what could be the root cause for this error ?
This is not happening for all the orders,for only few orders it happens.
If we create new order for same sold to ,sales doc type the error is not occuring.
Thanks,
Praveen

Code help in writing a Program which resolves the pricing issues

Hello experts
i was asked to write a report program with the following requirements,(This is to address the pricing issues KSE(company code A ) is facing with KST(another company code B) for S-Bank program(an important program we use it in SD)
cananyone help with the code.? atlease a skeleton to start the program is highly appreciated.
Thanks
SP
Selection Parameters
Material
Sold to party
Sales Org
Plant
Sales order
Actual goods movement dates
Invoice number
Sales order
Report
-Should detail only the Sbank scopes (all FERTs beginning with S*)
-Detail by line items
     -Material number
     -Serial number of device shipped
-Serial number from SBANK_SERIAL_NUMBER characteristic in KSE_SN_ENDOSCOPES class contained in name plate data
     -Delivery number
     -Invoice number
     -Invoice price
     -Notification number
     -KST Repair level (coding field in notification)
     -KSE Repair level (activity code text from KSE-SM07 code group)
Thanks
SP

http://java.sun.com/developer/onlineTraining/JavaMail/

Variant Configuration - Pricing issue

Hi,
Can anybody please help me out with the pricing issue which I am facing?
How can I increase the price by a certain percentage based on the value of another pricing condition VA00 and show it as a different pricing condition?
For example: VA00 for my product price shows 1000. Now on 1000, I want to calculate 30% and show it with a different pricing condition description such as "Surcharge". I cannot used a fixed price for lets say "Surcharge" because 1000 as product price is not fixed/static and will depend upon variant configuration and the "Surcharge" will also vary with it.
How can I please implement such a solution?
With best regards,
Sunil

Use the VA01 condition type for this. This is the standard condition type provided by SAP to address this issue. In your pricing procedure against VA01 give the From To as VA00.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
GSL.

Retail pricing issue

Hi
How to change Sales prices and purchase price in mass range of sites, range of articles

Hi Sathish
DO that in VKP5 transaction..and save it ..
Anis

Idoc issue in AFS-Retail.

one of our customers require the following criteria for VAT & Surcharge Calculation:
AS PER SAP
Customer's requirement
TAXABLE AMOUNT
1695.83
TAXABLE AMOUNT
1696.37
VAT-5.50%
93.79
VAT-5.50%
93.30
S/C-10% ON VAT-5.5.%
9.38
S/C-10% ON VAT-5.5.%
9.33
BILL AMOUNT
1799.00
BILL AMOUNT
1799.00
Sales process:
Sales done in third part software then via an XML file billing gets uploaded in SAP by 'Z' transaction.
Which means Release to Accounting is not done after VF01.
They do not do VF01 they directly post their billing in accounting by 'Z' Transaction.
More Details
AFS & Retail= 2 Servers
Interface = Idoc
Third Party software at retail stores.
Issue: When we wrote a new sub-routine in pricing procedure, everything started working good but Idoc processing Failed. When we remove that routine Idoc works fine.
Error thrown by SAP:
We checked the SAP Note 506040 also but could not find any solution. Plz help..
Regards,
Abdul Wahab

Idoc issue solved.
.Thanks for your valuable inputs but the issue was due to the inconsistency in data.
an implicit enhancement was there which was changing few values in some tables but not in all the related tables.
so the above mentioned ERROR came.
But now the data is consistent and no IDOC error is there but while release to accounting( from a Custom program ) still the same old values are sent to accounting.
We are on ECC 6.0 so the note number is not valid for us..
Regards
Abdul Wahab

Pricing issue with Product hierarchy - Urgent

Hello,
I have an issue on pricing determination with product hierarchy.
I created product hierarchy as following,
level1 - A0001
level2 - A0001B0001
level3 - A0001B0001C0001
Then, assigned A0001B0001C0001 to material D in material master.
I created condition record with A0001B0001C0001(level 3), the system found the condition sucessfully when I created a sales order with material D.
However, I created condition record with A0001(level1) but the system didn't get the price when I created the sales order with material D. Since A0001B0001C0001 belongs to A0001, the system is supposed to get the price from the condition record with A0001...
Could you please let me know how to fix it?

Hi,
Thanks a lot for your kind explanation.
Here is the access sequence I defined. I wonder if there is anyway I can define PRODH1, PRODH2, PRODH3 in access sequnce the same way with customer hierarchy so that the system can check higher level data. If it's not allowed, I think I should define routine in requirement as you advised. Thanks!
*Accesses
AcNo       Description
1           Customer Hierarchy/Product Hiearchy
2           Customer Hierarchy/Product Hiearchy
3           Customer Hierarchy/Product Hiearchy
4           Customer Hierarchy/Product Hiearchy
Fields
AcNo   Condition    Doc. field      field lable
     1      HIENR      HIEBO01     CustomerHierarchy 01
             PRODH     PRODH       Product hierarchy
     2.     HIENR      HIEBO02     CustomerHierarchy 02
             PRODH     PRODH       Product hierarchy
     3      HIENR      HIEBO03     CustomerHierarchy 03
             PRODH     PRODH       Product hierarchy
     4       HIENR      HIEBO04     CustomerHierarchy 04
             PRODH     PRODH       Product hierarchy
I wonder if I can assign product hierachy fields, PRODH1, PRODH2, PRODH3 to access sequence like customer hierarchy so that the system can check higher level data to get the price...

Good Movement issue in SAP retail ITS

Hi All,
Business is posting goods movement using SAP retail store ITS. The document gets posted in SAP successfully but storage location is not coming correct for a movement type. We have checked the configuration and it is fine. We are not able to replicate the issue in test systems.
Kindly help us on how we can able to find a cause of this issue.
Thanks for you help.
Regards,
John

Hi John,
Retail Store Application is desinged in such a way that for the movement type,the default storage location for the destination plant is automatically taken.
But you can modify the code as per your requirments by implementing the given BAdI.
CALL METHOD exit_gr_field->CHECK_INPUT_GR_item
Modify the field for stroage location W_UMLGO .
I hope this helps.
Regards,
Lorraine

PRICING ISSUE BADI ME_DEFINE_CALCTYPE- URGENT

Hi Guys,
My requirement was to trigger new pricing on change of Delivery Date. I have to retrigger pricing only if there is any change in fields EKKO-INCO1, EKKO-INCO2, EKPO-MATNR and EKPO-ADRNR.
For the same I have implemented three badi's and one pricing routine.
BADI's are -
ME_DEFINE_CALCTYPE - Method DEFINE_CALCTYPE : Setting the Flag CH_X_LF_CALCTYPE If there is difference between the old value and new value of Fields mentioned above.
ME_CHECK_ALL_ITEMS - Method RECALCULATE_ITEMS Setting the Flag CH_X_RECALCULATE. If there is change in the Incoterms field at PO Header.
In these BADI's I am checking if there is any change in the above mentioned fields. It retrigger the Pricing.
I have implemented one more BADI (ME_PROCESS_PO_CUST-Method PROCESS_SCHEDULE) which will trigger the pricing process, If we change the delivery date. This will pick the current delivery date and EXPORT it to memory ID which will be later IMPORTED to pass on this date to pricing header based on which the Pricing will be done on the changed delivery date. ( I hope I am correct here )
I have a pricing routine for one of the condition type in pricing. I am exporting the changed delivery date to the routine and replacing the value of KOMK-PRSDT with this new delivery date.
The issue is, When I do changes for the first time the pricing is working correctly. And I am able to see the PO field values for which the condition record is matched in the pricing analysis .But when I am saving the PO and again changing the values of Delivery date and any one of the fields mentioned. Pricing Analysis shows the same old values of PO fields for which the condition records were matched on last pricing cycle.
Please let me know where I am wrong or where I can correct to display the current values of PO fields for which the condition records matched in the Pricing Analysis.
Regards,
Mayank
PS : Points will be rewarded for all the helpful posts.
Message was edited by:
 Har Mayank Sahai
Message was edited by:
 Har Mayank Sahai
Message was edited by:
 Har Mayank Sahai

Try this...
After importing the memory fields use FREE to free the memory....
That will solve your priblem...
Reward if helpful...

Pricing Issue Pricing Analysis - BADI ME_DEFINE_CALCTYPE

Hi Guys,
My requirement was to trigger new pricing on change of Delivery Date. I have to retrigger pricing only if there is any change in fields EKKO-INCO1, EKKO-INCO2,EKET-EINDT, EKPO-MATNR and EKPO-ADRNR.
For the same I have implemented three badi's and one pricing routine.
BADI's are -
ME_DEFINE_CALCTYPE - Method DEFINE_CALCTYPE : Setting the Flag CH_X_LF_CALCTYPE If there is difference between the old value and new value of Fields mentioned above.
ME_CHECK_ALL_ITEMS - Method RECALCULATE_ITEMS Setting the Flag CH_X_RECALCULATE. If there is change in the Incoterms field at PO Header.
In these BADI's I am checking if there is any change in the above mentioned fields. It retrigger the Pricing.
I have implemented one more BADI (ME_PROCESS_PO_CUST-Method PROCESS_SCHEDULE) which will trigger the pricing process, If we change the delivery date. This will pick the current delivery date and EXPORT it to memory ID which will be later IMPORTED to pass on this date to pricing header based on which the Pricing will be done on the changed delivery date. ( I hope I am correct here )
I have a pricing routine for one of the condition type in pricing. I am exporting the changed delivery date to the routine and changing the value of KOMK-PRSDT with this new delivery date value.
The issue is, When I do changes for the first time the pricing is working correctly. And I am able to see the PO field values for which the condition record is matched in the pricing analysis .But when I am saving the PO and again changing the values of Delivery date and any one of the fields mentioned. Pricing Analysis shows the same old values of PO fields for which the condition records were matched on last pricing cycle.
Please let me know where I am wrong or where I can correct to display the current values of PO fields for which the condition records matched in the Pricing Analysis.
Regards,
Mayank
PS : Points will be rewarded for all the helpful posts.

hi this is the code:
method IF_EX_ME_PROCESS_PO_CUST~PROCESS_ITEM.
DATA:   RE_DATA TYPE MEPOITEM,
          IM_DATA TYPE MEPOITEM.
     CALL METHOD IM_ITEM->get_data
     RECEIVING
        RE_DATA = RE_DATA.
MOVE 'B' TO RE_DATA-calctype.
CALL METHOD IM_ITEM->set_data
         EXPORTING
            IM_DATA = RE_DATA.
endmethod.
Upon creation of PO error message prompt
'Data from Business Add-In ME_PROCESS_PO_CUST not adopted'

ERLA/NORM, Header and Item Level Pricing Issue

Dear All,
I have an issue wherein, even though I have used ERLA for BoM Item and NORM for Subitems, in sales order Conditions, both header level and item level pricings are active.
Correct me if I am wrong, item level pricing should get deactivated.
Kindly let me know if there is any issue in the settings.
The default item categories appearing in the sales document is TAQ for higher level item and TAE for subitems
Thanks and Regards
Adithya
Edited by: Adi1976 on Feb 6, 2012 12:08 PM

Item Category group for Subitems should be ERLA, not NORM.
Sales Order
- Item Cat Group
- Higher I Cat
- I Cat
OR
ERLA
TAQ
OR
ERLA
TAQ
TAE
Try & share feedback.
Regards
JP

Performance Issues in IS-Retail system

Hi Idoc Gurus,
We are working in IS-Retail environment.
As a part of process we are posting sales from POS system in R/3 system.
Which than create a billing document in SD.While doing this process,there are performance issues.
Issue is that this sales posting takes considerable time which hampers system performance.
Our Idoc sizes are considerably big.We are planning to break this Idoc to 1000 segments.
Kindly suggest what is a solution apart from breaking Idocs.
Warm Regards,
Anil

Hello,
As you are creating billing document, then the billing document object RV_BELEG table should be buffered. This is the number range object for SD documents. You can activate buffering in SNRO transaction, this will reduce the time for creating the billing documents. Also Please have a look into the SAP Note 213546 is a collective note for POS inbound.
Hope this helps
Regards
Dileep

Extended Classic Scenario Pricing issue, can I over come by using SRM-MDM?.

Hi SRM GURU'S,
I am using ECC 6.0, SRM 5.5, SUS, LAC, cFolders and SRM-MDM with Extended Classic Scenario.
My Question is : In case of Extended classic scenario, there is issue with Pricing and conditions. Is there any possibility to overcome this issue by using SRM-MDM. Or do I have to go for IPC. My client has not brought IPC. I have to cover Pricing with the above components.
Anyone suggest me, how to proceed. Thanks in Advance. Awaiting for quick response.
Thanks & Regards,
John.

Hi Masa,
We can maintain Price and conditions as a record in CCM for Particular Material or Vendor. When you add that record to shopping cart it will update. I mean, If the provision is available in MDM, I don't want to use the Two components for same functionality.
If I use IPC, Is there separate license for that. What else need to be updated to use IPC (Patches etc).
If you have IPC configuration material, could you please share with me? How to bridge the SRM Conditions and ECC Conditions?
Please clearly give me details. I really appreciate you.
Regards,
John.

Intercompany Pricing issue

I have an issue with intercompany pricing. I need to redetermine the pricing (reprice the billing document) on a user exit; at least I believe so. What we are doing is as follows:
We need to change the sales org, distribution channel, and sales group, on the billing document, in order to distribute commissions properly. We then have a pricing condition setup but we get the following message (message number 108) when we view the pricing conditions of the saved billing document:
"Condition record exists, but has not been set"
What does this mean and/or how do we solve it? I assume it just means that I have to manually reprice it after I change the fields.
Regards,
Davis

Thanks for your reply
Yes I followed the same process first intercompany invoice and then standard invoice.
but got pricing error in intercompany invoice and also the pricing procedure is picked up accurately only the values are not appearing.
The condition records are also maintained properly for billing date.
Thanks,
Deepak

Listing Issues in IS-Retail

Hi All,
We are facing some problem with listing of articles in IS-Retail system implementation.
The issue is ...
We have some articles which are in Development Status but we are able to do the listing for this Articles which we don't want to list.
i would appreciate if you can give some ideas how can avoid listing of the Articles which are in development status either through the config or development.
Thanks,
Venkat

Hi ,
Creating articles doesnot list in stores. The new article need to list in to assortment.Stores/sites are linked to assortment.
once the listing process completes,listing conditions will create.
if you dont want to list the article,,dont assign the article to any assortment.if already listed,,discontinue the article from assortment.
Regars,
Krish

Pricing issues in IS-Retail

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for