Print authentication problem with a shared USB printer
I'm trying to assist my brother with the setup of his new iMac i3 (running 10.6.4). He is converting from a G5 iMac (which was, I believe, on Tiger) to the i3 and has a Canon MP610 printer. The Canon MP610 printer has been connected via USB to the G5 with printer sharing on, and his wife has been able to print to the printer over Bonjour from her MacBook Pro (OS 10.5.8) when it was shared via the G5.
As soon as we moved the printer to the i3, she became unable to print from the MacBook Pro, because it began putting documents on hold in the queue and requiring authentication to print.
Nothing we've tried will ether allow us to get past the authentication or get rid of the prompt. We've deleted and re-added the printer multiple times, assured that the new i3 is the only one set up for sharing its connected printer - tried different user passwords to authenticate - we're stuck. My brother is the sole user/administrator account on the i3, his wife is the sole administrator/user on the MacBook Pro. The MP610 has been totally deleted from the old G5 so we don't think it is interfering.
They're in California, I'm doing remote support from Texas. The computers and printer are all in the same room in their home.
I've read posts this morning in the community about this issue but they all reference Windows networks.. there is no Windows or mixed Windows-Mac model in our scenario.
Please help! thanks in advance.
The layout of the print window is not the same as OS 9.x and prior. There will not be a choice for double sided printing as there was pre OS X unless the printer comes with an automatic duplexer.
You will have to figure out how to print odds and evens in separate jobs and do it manually.
Matt
Similar Messages
-
Upgraded three systems to Mountain Lion yesterday (Early 2011 MBP, Mid 2010 Mini and Mid 2011 Mini).
I rely on Screen Sharing to maintain the two Minis using the MBP. Now, while the Mid 2010 Mini can be accessed just fine, the same is not true for the Mid 2011 Mini. After a long delay, a window will pop up but is black. If I toggle between scaled and full screen a couple of times, the screen will be displayed but will accept no input. Odd.I was able to resolve the problem with screen sharing from my MBP to my problematic Mini.
My home network uses a Belkin N600 dual band router with both the MBP and Mini using the faster N band. After switching the Mini to the slower band, screen sharing began working again. My other Mini that worked all along was hardwired to the router so was not an issue.
Oddly, with Lion, screen sharing worked having the MPB and Mini on the same N band. -
I have some problem with home sharing
I have some problem with home sharing. I have iPad, iPhone, MacMini, MacBook and Apple Tv. Five items. I can't add other items to home sharing, like iPhones and pc of my sons, and my wife's pc. More than home (Family) sharing it becomes Single sharing. Is there any solution?
Post in the iPhoto forums.
-
Oracle 11g problem with creating shared memory segments
Hi, i'm having some problems with the oracle listener, when i'm trying to start it or reload it I get the follow error massages:
TNS-01114: LSNRCTL could not perform local OS authentication with the listener
TNS-01115: OS error 28 creating shared memory segment of 129 bytes with key 2969090421
My system is a: SunOS db1-oracle 5.10 Generic_144489-06 i86pc i386 i86pc (Total 64GB RAM)
Current SGA is set to:
Total System Global Area 5344731136 bytes
Fixed Size 2233536 bytes
Variable Size 2919238464 bytes
Database Buffers 2399141888 bytes
Redo Buffers 24117248 bytes
prctl -n project.max-shm-memory -i process $$
process: 21735: -bash
NAME PRIVILEGE VALUE FLAG ACTION RECIPIENT
project.max-shm-memory
privileged 64.0GB - deny
I've seen that a solution might be "Make sure that system resources like shared memory and heap memory are available for LSNRCTL tool to execute properly."
I'm not exactly sure how to check that there is enough resources?
I've also seen a solution stating:
"Try adjusting the system-imposed limits such as the maximum number of allowed shared memory segments, or their maximum and minimum sizes. In other cases, resources need to be freed up first for the operation to succeed."
I've tried to modify the "max-sem-ids" parameter and set it to recommended 256 without any success and i've kind of run out of options what the error can be?
/RegardsI see, I do have the max-shm-ids quite high already so it shouldn't be a problem?
user.oracle:100::oracle::process.max-file-descriptor=(priv,4096,deny);
process.max-stack-size=(priv,33554432,deny);
project.max-shm-memory=(priv,68719476736,deny) -
Netcfg problem with wep shared key
hello guys,
I would like to connect to a wireless device with netcfg. The device has a WEP encryption with shared key authentication. I'm able to connect using the gnome nm-applet, but with netcfg i keep getting the "Wireless association failed" error.
My config file for netcfg:
CONNECTION="wireless"
DESCRIPTION="A simple WEP encrypted wireless connection"
INTERFACE="wlan0"
SECURITY="wep"
ESSID="[essid]"
KEY="s:[password]"
IP="dhcp"
May the problem lie in the shared key authentication? I tried
IWCONFIG="enc restricted"
but it still doesn't work. I have an intel 3945 wireless card.
Any help is appreciated,
thanks.what puzzles me is that
1) i'm able to connect to the same device if I set the open authentication,
2) I'm able to connect if I set the WPA protection, and
3) I'm even able to connect (with WEP and shared key authentication) using gnome nm-applet.
The only problem I have is with netcfg and iwconfig, so i'm asking if iwconfig has a specific problem with shared authentication and if there is a way to handle it. -
Problem with T60 and USB Sticks
All -
I can't understand it but I have a huge problem with USB devices and my T60.
EVERY USB device works 100% fine - despite of USB memory/HDD/other memory devices.
Neither USB HDD or USB Sticks nor a SD drive via USB - no media is accecpted.
I always get back: "Media not formatted".
If I do format everthing works - but only with this notebook.
So I am not able to share data with other computer - or not able to get my pics from my cam...
Please can you help?
Thank you very much in advance,
iBigfoot
Message Edited by ibigfoot2008 on 09-05-2008 10:04 AM
Message Edited by ibigfoot2008 on 09-05-2008 10:05 AM
Message Edited by ibigfoot2008 on 09-05-2008 10:05 AMI hate to say it, but I agree with carbon_unit, this sounds like a Windows problem.
As a long shot you could try uninstalling all USB hubs in Device Manager, re-install the Chipset Drivers and restart the sytem to allow the USB hubs automatically installed again. I doubt this will help, but it's all I could think of.
Andy ______________________________________
Please remember to come back and mark the post that you feel solved your question as the solution, it earns the member + points
Did you find a post helpfull? You can thank the member by clicking on the star to the left awarding them Kudos Please add your type, model number and OS to your signature, it helps to help you. Forum Search Option T430 2347-G7U W8 x64, Yoga 10 HD+, Tablet 1838-2BG, T61p 6460-67G W7 x64, T43p 2668-G2G XP, T23 2647-9LG XP, plus a few more. FYI Unsolicited Personal Messages will be ignored.
Deutsche Community Comunidad en Español English Community Русскоязычное Сообщество
PepperonI blog -
Problems with a shared calendar using Outlook 2007 and Exchange 2010
Hello all,
We are having a problem with sharing a calendar using Outlook 2007 and Exchange 2010.
I will start with some background. I have just started my position with this company. I have been working with networks for awhile at the small business level. I have not had much production experience with exchange. There is only myself and my supervisor
who has inherited a midsized network which was built by five previous techs that are no longer with the company. Of course, the previous techs did not leave much documentation, so the original hows and whys for our system setup has been lost.
One of the managers has a calendar she shares with some of our users. I believe this calendar has been in use since sometime in 2006. A mailbox was created to hold this calendar to keep it separate from the managers calendar. I am not sure what version
of exchange they were using at that time, but I assume there was one or two migrations of it getting to its current state on our exchange 2010 server. At some point it was observed that the other workers she was sharing with were not able to access it correctly.
I am not fully sure what the original problem was (possibly some people not being able to see or connect to the calendar), but it was decided to give everyone who needed access to this calendar full access permissions through exchange. Correct me if I
am wrong, but I believe that gave everyone connected the ability to do anything with the calendar. Of course the manager was not happy about that. This is where I started working on the problem.
I removed everyone, except the manager who wants to control the calendar, from having "Full Access Permissions". This did have the effect of making some people just able to see the calendar and not make changes. Though there were others that were
able to connect to the calendar who I thought would not be able to. The manager that originally created the calendar did try to manage access to it through the Outlook interface, though it currently does not seem to be fully in effect.
So, to get to the point of what we are trying to do, is there a way to get the original manager back into control of the calendar though Outlook? It would be preferred to be able to keep the history of what they tracked of this calendar, so starting a new
one would be something we would rather avoid. After that, getting all of the users that need to connect to the calendar reconnected with the correct access permissions and making sure they are all synchronized.
I realize this is a big mess, and your help would be greatly appreciated.Hi Nigel,
How is the impact, just one user or all users, Outlook or OWA?
If just one user, it seems like an issue on the Outlook Client side.
Please trying to re-create new profile to fresh the caches.
Please runing Outlook under safe mode to avoid some AVs, add-ins and firewall.
Found a similar thread for your reference:
Calendar Sharing not available error message
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/exchange/en-US/d9b33281-d7bb-4608-8025-16fb26643d0d/calendar-sharing-not-available-error-message?forum=exchangesvrclientslegacy
Hope it is helpful
Thanks
Mavis
Mavis Huang
TechNet Community Support -
ISE 1.2 web authentication problem with wired clients
Hello,
i am having problems with centralized web authentication using a Catalyst 3650X with IOS 15.0.2 SE01 and ISE 1.2.
Redirecting the client works fine, but as soon the client opens a web browser and ISE websites open to authenticate the client, the switch port resets, the authentication process restarts and the session ID changes. After the client enters the credentials a session expired messages appears on the client and i get an 86017 Session Missing message in ISE.
here the output form the debug aaa coa log.
Any ideas
thanks in advanced
Alex
! CLIENT CONNECT TO SWITCHPORT
ISE-TEST-SWITCH#show authentication sessions interface gi0/3
Interface: GigabitEthernet0/3
MAC Address: 001f.297b.bd82
IP Address: 10.2.12.45
User-Name: 00-1F-29-7B-BD-82
Status: Authz Success
Domain: DATA
Security Policy: Should Secure
Security Status: Unsecure
Oper host mode: multi-auth
Oper control dir: both
Authorized By: Authentication Server
Vlan Policy: N/A
ACS ACL: xACSACLx-IP-PERMIT_ALL_TRAFFIC-537cb1d6
URL Redirect ACL: ACL-WEBAUTH-REDIRECT
URL Redirect: https://nos-ch-wbn-ise1.nosergroup.lan:8443/guestportal/gateway?sessionId=AC1484640000026B28C02CDC&action=cwa
Session timeout: N/A
Idle timeout: N/A
Common Session ID: AC1484640000026B28C02CDC
Acct Session ID: 0x0000029C
Handle: 0x8C00026C
Runnable methods list:
Method State
dot1x Failed over
mab Authc Success
! CLIENT OPENS INTERNETEXPLORER -> REDIRECTS TO ISE
! SWITCHPORT GOES IN ADMINISTRATIVE DOWN STARTS AUTHENTICATION AGAIN
ISE-TEST-SWITCH#
191526: .Jun 24 10:42:24.340 UTC: COA: 10.0.128.38 request queued
191527: .Jun 24 10:42:24.340 UTC: RADIUS: authenticator 7F A9 85 AB F6 4A D0 F3 - B4 E6 F2 56 74 C6 2D 33
191528: .Jun 24 10:42:24.340 UTC: RADIUS: NAS-IP-Address [4] 6 172.20.132.100
191529: .Jun 24 10:42:24.340 UTC: RADIUS: Calling-Station-Id [31] 19 "00:1F:29:7B:BD:82"
191530: .Jun 24 10:42:24.340 UTC: RADIUS: Acct-Terminate-Cause[49] 6 admin-reset [6]
191531: .Jun 24 10:42:24.340 UTC: RADIUS: Event-Timestamp [55] 6 1403606529
191532: .Jun 24 10:42:24.340 UTC: RADIUS: Message-Authenticato[80] 18
191533: .Jun 24 10:42:24.340 UTC: RADIUS: E0 3C B2 8C 89 47 67 A8 69 F5 3D 08 61 FF 53 6E [ <Ggi=aSn]
191534: .Jun 24 10:42:24.340 UTC: RADIUS: Vendor, Cisco [26] 43
191535: .Jun 24 10:42:24.340 UTC: RADIUS: Cisco AVpair [1] 37 "subscriber:command=bounce-host-port"
191536: .Jun 24 10:42:24.340 UTC: COA: Message Authenticator decode passed
191537: .Jun 24 10:42:24.340 UTC: ++++++ CoA Attribute List ++++++
191538: .Jun 24 10:42:24.340 UTC: 06D96C58 0 00000001 nas-ip-address(600) 4 172.20.132.100
191539: .Jun 24 10:42:24.349 UTC: 06D9AC18 0 00000081 formatted-clid(37) 17 00:1F:29:7B:BD:82
191540: .Jun 24 10:42:24.349 UTC: 06D9AC4C 0 00000001 disc-cause(434) 4 admin-reset
191541: .Jun 24 10:42:24.349 UTC: 06D9AC80 0 00000001 Event-Timestamp(445) 4 1403606529(53A95601)
191542: .Jun 24 10:42:24.349 UTC: 06D9ACB4 0 00000081 ssg-command-code(490) 1 33
191543: .Jun 24 10:42:24.349 UTC:
191544: .Jun 24 2014 10:42:24.365 UTC: %EPM-6-IPEVENT: IP 10.2.12.45| MAC 001f.297b.bd82| AuditSessionID AC1484640000026B28C02CDC| AUTHTYPE DOT1X| EVENT IP-RELEASE
191545: .Jun 24 2014 10:42:24.382 UTC: %EPM-6-IPEVENT: IP 10.2.12.45| MAC 001f.297b.bd82| AuditSessionID AC1484640000026B28C02CDC| AUTHTYPE DOT1X| EVENT IP-WAIT
191546: .Jun 24 2014 10:42:24.382 UTC: %EPM-6-POLICY_REQ: IP 0.0.0.0| MAC 001f.297b.bd82| AuditSessionID AC1484640000026B28C02CDC| AUTHTYPE DOT1X| EVENT REMOVE
191547: .Jun 24 2014 10:42:24.390 UTC: %EPM-6-AUTH_ACL: POLICY Auth-Default-ACL-OPEN| EVENT DETACH-SUCCESS
191548: .Jun 24 2014 10:42:26.353 UTC: %LINK-5-CHANGED: Interface GigabitEthernet0/3, changed state to administratively down
191549: .Jun 24 2014 10:42:27.359 UTC: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface GigabitEthernet0/3, changed state to down
ISE-TEST-SWITCH#
191550: .Jun 24 2014 10:42:36.366 UTC: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface GigabitEthernet0/3, changed state to down
191551: .Jun 24 10:42:40.592 UTC: AAA/BIND(000002A7): Bind i/f
191552: .Jun 24 2014 10:42:41.129 UTC: %AUTHMGR-5-START: Starting 'dot1x' for client (001f.297b.bd82) on Interface Gi0/3 AuditSessionID AC1484640000026C28C2FA05
191553: .Jun 24 2014 10:42:42.580 UTC: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface GigabitEthernet0/3, changed state to up
191554: .Jun 24 2014 10:42:43.586 UTC: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface GigabitEthernet0/3, changed state to up
! SESSION ID CHANGES, USER ENTERS CREDENTIALS
! ERROR MESSAGE AT CLIENT "YOUR SESSION HAS EXPIRED"
! ERROR MESSAGE IN ISE "86017 SESSION MISSING"
ISE-TEST-SWITCH#show authentication sessions interface gi0/3
Interface: GigabitEthernet0/3
MAC Address: 001f.297b.bd82
IP Address: 10.2.12.45
Status: Running
Domain: UNKNOWN
Security Policy: Should Secure
Security Status: Unsecure
Oper host mode: multi-auth
Oper control dir: both
Session timeout: N/A
Idle timeout: N/A
Common Session ID: AC1484640000026C28C2FA05
Acct Session ID: 0x0000029D
Handle: 0x2C00026D
Runnable methods list:
Method State
dot1x Running
mab Not runGuest authentication failed: 86017: Session cache entry missing
try adjusting the UTC timezone during the guest creation in the sponsor portal.
86017
Guest
Session Missing
Session ID missing. Please contact your System Administrator.
Info -
Problems with my computer (USB 3.0 and LAN)
Hi there,
A few months ago i have built my own computer. I selected the parts and asked if it will work together with no problems.
After I built it and installed Windows 8.1 I detected that almost everything worked. Only the USB 3.0 did not work properly but I had no big worries because it was no big issue for me.
Today I decided to use a LAN connection (cable) instead of using a WIFI adapter. I found that the computer didn't detect the cable. First I thought that there was no signal trough the cable so I checked it. I put the cable in my Playstation 3 and did a Internet test. Everything worked. So I found it strange that the cable didn't worked in the computer (same cable as playstation). I searched the internet if I had installed the correct drivers. After looking in Device manager I found that there was no Internet adapter connected (I disconnected my WIFI adapter). Up to now I didn't resolved the problem but I tried a lot of things.
For the USB 3.0, I found that there is an unkown device (device manager) and when I let it search for the proper driver it says that it don't have enough information.
The name for the device is: USB xHCI-compatible hostcontroller (translated from Dutch). In the BIOS it detects which component I connect to the USB 3.0 Slot but when I am in windows (8.1), It says nothing (not even a sound that it's connected). So I think it is something with the drivers or chipset??
Parts of my computer:
Intel I5 4670K (Haswell) (Socket 1150)
MSI GTX 770
2x Ballistix 4GB RAM memory
Samsung EVO 120GB SSD
Seagate 1TB HDD
MSI B85M-G43
Case is an Fractal Design R4 windowed black
My questions
- How do I install the Networkcard properly
- How do I install the USB 3.0 Properly
I would appreciate it if you could solve the problems for me!
Already thanks!
JurCan you share the screen shot of the device manager?
According to B85M-G43, it is equipped with 4 x USB 3.0 ports (2 ports on the back panel, 2 ports available through the Intel USB connectors)
No need to install USB 3.0 driver in WIN8.1 just in-box is okay.
Did you tried the LAN driver from the website?
http://www.msi.com/support/mb/B85MG43.html#down-driver&Win8.1 64 -
Problem with File Sharing-Permissions throughout Folders
I'm having an odd problem when setting up a Mac Pro with File Sharing. I have a second Hard Drive in it which is a Server Drive to be shared as a networked Hard Drive for both my MBP and my Fiancee's MBP. Here is the problem I have.
I set up File Sharing and set up both her ID and my ID. Since this is done she is able to get to drive from my MBP and she is able to get to the drive from her MBP. I am able to read or write to those folders. She is able to view them but is unable to write to them.
I went to the Server Drive icon on the Mac Pro's Desktop. When I right click and do "Get Info" and select Sharing I can tell her ID is not listed on any of the Folders. She is listed as Read and Write for the entire Hard Drive (which is an internal drive). I am also listed as Read and WRite and then it lists Everyone and says No Access. The same is listed in System Preferences in File Sharing. I have heard this Everyone 'No Access' can cause problems but I prefer not to give access to everyone. The only other option is Read Only and Read and Write. Also, when I have Everyone selected the - sign is greyed out so I'm unable to remove Everyone.
To continue, what is strange is I thought with it saying on the Server Drive itself for my Fiancee, read & write, that it would say this on every Folder inside. Yet when I select any Folder inside on the Server Drive and select Get Info it says for me "Read & Write" and for Staff "Read Only" and for Everyone "Read only" I'm not even sure where Staff comes fro and of course Everyone is Read Only and my Fiancee not even listed. It just seems that these file sharing permissions are not replicated througout all the Folders when I select it for the Hard Drive itself. What could be causing this and how can I get the same to go throughout the Folders? I know manually I could change them all but this would take a long time and likely still be a problem when any additional Folders are added.1. I have turned logged into it from my MBP while at Home and if I'm logged in as Guest I only see the Server Drive which is good. My concern is that if I log in with my login I then sell all Folders including the Main 'Macintosh HD' At least as a guest I can only see the Server Drive but is it any way I can stop it from showing all the other folders on the computer since I have no reason to do that?
When you login to a mac as an administrator it is normal to see all the contents of the volumes connected to that mac.
2. Also, I would like to disable all access for Guest. Yet I have it list Everyone or Guest in the file sharing and I have no way of deleting this. I don't want a Guest to be able to connect to this computer or share any files at all on it. Is there any way to disable this?
Goto system preferernces-->accounts
click on the lock to and enter your password to unlock the preference pane.
Then select the guest account. Then uncheck the 2 check boxes. The account should now have 'disabled' underneath it.
3. Security: How secure is this? I am using it on a Home Wi-Fi network with an Airport Base Station 1GB. I have the Leopard filewall set to "Set Access for Specific Services" since it won't work with "Allow only essential services" I hope my home network is more security but with Back to my Mac how hard would it be for someone to be able to find this computer on the network? I don't do any filesharing on my MBP but do have it set up for File Sharing but only with my login ID.
If you have your base station set to distribute ip addresses then it is acting as a NAT router and will firewall you.
I have not setup back to my mac yet so can't comment on its security. Although I would suggest a strong password.
have a read of Mac OS X 10.5: About Back to My Mac security
My method of remote access is to use SSH and run screen sharing over an SSH tunnel. -
Problems with File Sharing.... prev query unanswered
Hello everyone,
I posted this query last month and have yet to solve the problem. I was hoping for some fresh ideas.
I am running a network on an OS X Server between three labs (around 50 computers connected). One lab has 3 IBMs running with Windows XP that are connected directly to a switch (via cable) and 1 IMac that runs from an airport device (Base).
The second lab has 3 computers running from the switch, and 3 Macs running from an additional airport baystation (located in that lab).
The problem I am having deals with file sharing. We have several folders which all users have access to ("public" folders) as well as "user" folders which allow access to the individual users, faculty members, and the admin account.
All permissions under "server preferences" seem to be defined appropriately.
Eg) selected "only those registered users" with specified user access indicated.
Initially after setup, all folder access within the two primary labs appears correct on all computers. However, within a few days, all Macs that run from the Baystation in the second lab no longer show correct folder access.
No problems occur with the IMac in the first lab.
Typically only one student folder will appear, and it will not be the correct one. No public folders show up (or rarely do). I had thought it may be a problem with users logging out, so I changed settings to induce an automatic logout after 30min of inactivity. This worked at first, but the problem again started after a few days.
I have tried many things and this problem still seems to occur within a few days of having fixed it. I am wondering if it may be an issue with the Baystation, though I am not sure how to address this. Any ideas would be much appreciated!!
Thanks.Hi There,
We have just upgraded all design computers to imac and upgraded our software to CS5 and we are still having the same problem.
I called Adobe at the beginning of the week and they told me to speak to our IT department as it could be an issue with the preferances on out network.
Last time I spoke with IT they told me it was an Adobe issue. I am still very concerned about it but I have a tiny bit of relief that someone else is having the same trouble (although very annoying).
Any ideas on how to fix it? Are you running a windows server?
Please let me know if you find out any relevant info on this and I will do the same.
Thanks -
Problems with Sinn7 Audio USB Interface on Mountain Lion
Hi Guys.
I have problems with my USB Audio Interface Sinn7 Status 24/96 on Mountain Lion system.
When i istalled drivers, system doesn't detect the card. After the system reboot, when i pluck the card in to usb, system makes a kernel panic.
My hardware: MacBook Pro 15'' Late 2011 / OS X Mountain Lion / Audio Interface: Sinn7 Status 24/96.Hey DSevenPL,
Have you sorted this issue yet? I'm having the same problem on my mid 2012 Macbook Pro.
I had been running the sound card earlier on the same machine that you have (late 2011) w/out a problem but then got the new machine and it wouldn't read the sound card. Same issues as you.
Months of searching has turned up with nothing (and Sinn is unresponsive) so any insight would be greatly appreciated!
K x -
I have not been able to get Family Sharing to work well with my child. I have set up Family Sharing where I am the organizer, my wife is a parent/guardian, and my kids are also in as family members. My youngest is under 13, so I set up an @icloud appleID for her for use on her iPod. No issues in setting it up but I am having two ongoing problems - my guess is that they are related;
(1) When I go to purchases on my iPhone, the following is at the top of the screen: "This iTunes account is set up to use Family Sharing with a different iCloud account than [email protected]" Where [email protected] is my daughter's appleID. I am signed into everything on my iPhone under my appleID, and she is signed into everything under her appleID on her iPod.
(2) She went to download a free app from the App Store. It prompted her to "Ask to Buy" and she selected send. I never received the notification to approve her "purchase" The only way to get the app on her iPod was for me to "purchase" it on my iPhone; she could then download it from purchases on her iPod.
From my searching the communities and other forums (1) seems to be a common problem, but I have not yet seen a global solution posted. (2) also seems to be prevalent.
Note that when my son went to purchase an App for the Macbook Air, I did received the notification.
Any assistance would be great.Hey Charliebunny,
Thanks for the question. The following resources may help you grasp a better understanding of Family Sharing:
Family Sharing
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT201060
Sharing purchased content with Family Sharing
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT201085
Thanks,
Matt M. -
Problem with zoomG2.1u USB audio interface
Hello,
I've just started using my MacBook Pro as a recording unit lately and I've had some problems with my zoomG2.1u . It doesn't seem to be recognised by the Mac or by Ableton Live. In system preferences I got absolutely no USB input whatsoever, and neither in Ableton Live. The only input I have everywhere is Ext in wich is the standard microphone.
Am I doing something wrong, do I need a specific driver?
Thank you in advance .I took a look into the preferences of garageband on my MacBook - there are two different choosable options in Audio/MIDI. First Audio out: set to systempreferences second: Audio in: set to systempreferences.
Is this the right setting for my extern - microphone?
In the systempreferences panel the settings are line out and line in.
I also see the boxes flash when i speak into my plugged in micro.
So i think its right set.
Or isn´t it?
Does the audio input level have a relation on this sounds? -
Form-based authentication problem with weblogic
Hi Everyone,
The following problem related to form-based authentication
was posted one week ago and no reponse. Can someone give it
a shot? One more thing is added here. When I try it on J2EE
server and do the same thing, I didn't encounter this error
message, and I am redirected to the homeage.
Thanks.
-John
I am using weblogic5.1 and RDBMSRealm as the security realm. I am having the following problem with the form-based authentication login mechanism. Does anyone have an idea what the problem is and how to solve it?
When I login my application and logout as normal procedure, it is OK. But if I login and use the browser's BACK button to back the login page and try to login as a new user, I got the following error message,
"Form based authentication failed. Could not find session."
When I check the LOG file, it gives me the following message,
"Form based authentication failed. One of the following reasons could cause it: HTTP sessions are disabled. An old session ID was stored in the browser."
Normally, if you login and want to relogin without logout first, it supposes to direct you to the existing user session. But I don't understand why it gave me this error. I also checked my property file, it appears that the HTTP sessions are enabled as follows,
weblogic.httpd.session.enable=trueHi...
Hehe... I actually did implement the way you implement it. My login.jsp actually checks if the user is authenticated. If yes, then it will forward it to the home page. On the other hand, I used ServletAuthentication to solve the problem mentioned by Cameron where Form Authentication Failed usually occurs for the first login attempt. I'm also getting this error occasionally. Using ServletAuthentication totally eliminates the occurence of this problem.
I'm not using j_security_check anymore. ServletAuthentication does all the works. It also uses RDBMSRealm to authenticate the user. I think the biggest disadvantage I can see when using ServletAuthentication is that the requested resource will not be returned after authentication cause the page returned after authenticating the user is actually hard coded (for my case, it's the home.jsp)
cheers...
Jerson
"John Wang" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
Hi Jerson,
I tried your code this weekend, it didn't work in my case. But
I solved my specific problem other way. The idea behind my problem is that the user tries to relogin when he already logs in. Therefore, I just redirect the user into another page when he is getting the login page by htting the BACK button, rather than reauthenticate the user as the way you did.
But, I think your idea is very helpful if it could work. Problems such multiple concurrence logins can be solved by pre-processing.
In your new code, you solved the problem with a new approach. I am just wondering, do you still implement it with your login.jsp file? In other word, your action in login.jsp is still "Authenticate"? Where do you put the URL "j_security_check"?
Thanks.
-John
"Jerson Chua" <[email protected]> wrote:
I've solved the problem by using ServletAuthentication. So far I'm not getting the error message. One of the side effects is that it doesn't return the requested URI after authentication, it will always return the home page.
Jerson
package com.cyberj.catalyst.web;
import weblogic.servlet.security.*;
import javax.servlet.*;
import javax.servlet.http.*;
import java.io.*;
public class Authenticate extends HttpServlet {
private ServletAuthentication sa = new ServletAuthentication("j_username", "j_password");
public void doPost(HttpServletRequest request, HttpServletResponse response)
throws ServletException, java.io.IOException {
int authenticated = sa.weak(request, response);
if (authenticated == ServletAuthentication.NEEDS_CREDENTIALS ||
authenticated == ServletAuthentication.FAILED_AUTHENTICATION) {
response.sendRedirect("fail_login.jsp");
} else {
response.sendRedirect("Home.jsp");
public void doGet(HttpServletRequest request, HttpServletResponse response)
throws ServletException, java.io.IOException {
doPost(request, response);
"Jerson Chua" <[email protected]> wrote:
The problem is still there even if I use page redirection. Grrr... My boss wants me to solve this problem so what are the alternatives I can do? Are there any other ways of authenticating the user? In my web tier... I'm using isUserInRole, getRemoteUser and the web tier actually connects to EJBs. If I implement my custom authentication, I wouldn't be able to use this functionalities.
Has anyone solved this problem? I've tried the example itself and the same problem occurs.
Jerson
"Cameron Purdy" <[email protected]> wrote:
Jerson,
First try it redirected (raw) to see if that indeed is the problem ... then
if it works you can "fix" it the way you want.
Peace,
Cameron Purdy
Tangosol, Inc.
http://www.tangosol.com
+1.617.623.5782
WebLogic Consulting Available
"Jerson Chua" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
Hi...
Thanks for your suggestion... I've actually thought of that solution. Butusing page redirection will expose the user's password. I'm thinking of
another indirection where I will redirect it to another servlet but the
password is encrypted.
What do you think?
thanks....
Jerson
"Cameron Purdy" <[email protected]> wrote:
Maybe redirect to the current URL after killing the session to let the
request clean itself up. I don't think that a lot of the request (such
as
remote user) will be affected by killing the session until the nextrequest
comes in.
Peace,
Cameron Purdy
Tangosol, Inc.
http://www.tangosol.com
+1.617.623.5782
WebLogic Consulting Available
"Jerson Chua" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
Hello guys...
I've a solution but it doesn't work yet so I need your help. Because
one
of the reason for getting form base authentication failed is if an
authenticated user tries to login again. For example, the one mentionedby
John using the back button to go to the login page and when the user logsin
again, this error occurs.
So here's my solution
Instead of submitting the page to j_security_check, submit it to a
servlet
which will check if the user is logged in or not. If yes, invalidates its
session and forward it to j_security_check. But there's a problem in this
solution, eventhough the session.invalidate() (which actually logs theuser
out) is executed before forwarded to j_security_check, the user doesn't
immediately logged out. How did I know this, because after calling
session.invalidate, i tried calling request.RemoteUser() and it doesn't
return null. So I'm still getting the error. What I want to ask you guyis
how do I force logout before the j_security_check is called.
here's the code I did which the login.jsp actually submits to
import javax.servlet.*;
import javax.servlet.http.*;
import java.io.*;
public class Authenticate extends HttpServlet {
public void doPost(HttpServletRequest request, HttpServletResponseresponse)
throws ServletException, java.io.IOException {
if (request.getRemoteUser() != null) {
HttpSession session = request.getSession(false);
System.out.println(session.isNew());
session.invalidate();
Cookie[] cookies = request.getCookies();
for (int i = 0; i < cookies.length; i++) {
cookies.setMaxAge(0);
getServletContext().getRequestDispatcher("/j_security_check").forward(reques
t, response);
public void doGet(HttpServletRequest request, HttpServletResponseresponse)
throws ServletException, java.io.IOException {
doPost(request, response);
let's help each other to solve this problem. thanks.
Jerson
"Jerson Chua" <[email protected]> wrote:
I thought that this problem will be solved on sp6 but to my
disappointment, the problem is still there. I'm also using RDBMSRealm,same
as John.
Jerson
"Cameron Purdy" <[email protected]> wrote:
John,
1. You are using a single WL instance (i.e. not clustered) on that
NT
box
and doing so without a proxy (e.g. specifying http://localhost:7001),
correct?
2. BEA will pay more attention to the problem if you upgrade to SP6.If
you don't have a reason NOT to (e.g. a particular regression), then
you
should upgrade. That will save you one go-around with support: "Hi,I
am
on SP5 and I have a problem.", "Upgrade to SP6 to see if that fixes
it.
Call back if that doesn't work."
3. Make sure that you are not doing anything special before or after
J_SECURITY_CHECK ... make sure that you have everything configuredand
done
by the book.
4. Email BEA a bug report at [email protected] ... see what they say.
Peace,
Cameron Purdy
Tangosol, Inc.
http://www.tangosol.com
+1.617.623.5782
WebLogic Consulting Available
"John Wang" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
Cameron,
It seems to me that the problem I encountered is different a little
from
what you have, evrn though the error message is the same eventually.
Everytime I go through, I always get that error.
I am using weblogic5.1 and sp5 on NT4.0. Do you have any solutions
to
work
around this problem? If it was a BUG as you
pointed out, is there a way we can report it to the Weblogic
technical support and let them take a look?
Thnaks.
-John
"Cameron Purdy" <[email protected]> wrote:
John,
I will verify that I have seen this error now (after having read
about it
here for a few months) and it had the following characteristics:
1) It was intermittent, and appeared to be self-curing
2) It was not predictable, only seemed to occur at the first
login
attempt,
and may have been timing related
3) This was on Sun Solaris on a cluster of 2 Sparc 2xx's; the
proxy
was
Apache (Stronghold)
4) After researching the newsgroups, it appears that this "bug"
may
have gone away temporarily (?) in SP5 (although Jerson Chua
<[email protected]> mentioned that he still got it in SP5)
I was able to reproduce it most often by deleting the tmpwar and
tmp_deployments directories while the cluster was not running,
then
restarting the cluster. The first login attempt would fail(roughly
90%
of
the time?) and that server instance would then be ignored by the
proxy
for a
while (60 seconds?) -- meaning that the proxy would send all
traffic,
regardless of the number of "clients", to the other server in thecluster.
As far as I can tell, it is a bug in WebLogic, and probably has
been
there
for quite a while.
Peace,
Cameron Purdy
Tangosol, Inc.
http://www.tangosol.com
+1.617.623.5782
WebLogic Consulting Available
"John Wang" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
Hi Everyone,
The following problem related to form-based authentication
was posted one week ago and no reponse. Can someone give it
a shot? One more thing is added here. When I try it on J2EE
server and do the same thing, I didn't encounter this error
message, and I am redirected to the homeage.
Thanks.
-John
I am using weblogic5.1 and RDBMSRealm as the security realm. I
am
having
the following problem with the form-based authentication login
mechanism.
Does anyone have an idea what the problem is and how to solve it?
When I login my application and logout as normal procedure, it
is
OK.
But
if I login and use the browser's BACK button to back the login
page
and
try
to login as a new user, I got the following error message,
"Form based authentication failed. Could not find session."
When I check the LOG file, it gives me the following message,
"Form based authentication failed. One of the following reasons
could
cause it: HTTP sessions are disabled. An old session ID was stored
in
the
browser."
Normally, if you login and want to relogin without logout first,
it
supposes to direct you to the existing user session. But I don'tunderstand
why it gave me this error. I also checked my property file, it
appears
that
the HTTP sessions are enabled as follows,
weblogic.httpd.session.enable=true
Maybe you are looking for
-
I've searched through the web and this seems to be a recurrent problem that affects various versions of Acrobat. I've reinstalled Adobe Web Premium after a clean re-installation of Mac OS X 10.6.8. Acrobat 8 used to work fine, but now it closes after
-
I am wanting to give my Iphone 4 to a friend.
I am wanting to give my Iphone 4 to a friend and was wondering what I need to do to whip the phone clean from all my data? Do I just remove my SIM card?
-
I am trying to install itunes 11.1 but system says error occured run installer again...when I do I get the same thing again. Help
-
Session management in session bean calling session bean
Hi, I've got another question on transaction. I have following stateless session beans : session1 with trans-attribute Required. session2 with trans-attribute Required. session1 calls session2 and ses
-
While running Frame in Continuos stress mode following error occurred in console. Exception occurred during event dispatching: java.lang.StackOverflowError at java.awt.AWTEventMulticaster.windowDeactivated(Unknown Source) at java.awt.AWTEve