Print() method takes into account Acrobat's settings

Hello,
While I print a document using the Javascript method then the AutoRotate setting which is stored in the registry key of the computer is taken into account.
I mean that it's not possible to force auto-rotate while the bprintAutoRotate registry key is set to false (to set it you just have to open Acrobat and print a document without selecting auto-rotate - to remove it just make the opposite).
Is it normal? By the other hand while the auto-rotate is set to true then I just have to add the flags : suppressCenter and suppressRotate.
Thanks in advance,
Joe

Dear user,
You are getting such output because you have checked ON the setting 'Print to file' in one of your previous prints. For resolving this issue, kindly uncheck option 'Print to file' present in bottom left corner of print dialog and then click on 'Print' (See attached image for reference).
Hope this will solve your problem.
Thanks
sonal

Similar Messages

Does CC alert generation take into account 1/ act or 2/ act+perm ?

Dear Forum,
Can somebody shed some light on how alert generation works ? Are only the entries in the action tab of a function relevant ?
1. Suppose you have alertlog.txt
$ cat Alertlog.log
SYS-001 JDOE SM30 2008-07-28 09:15:07 ENDUSER
SYS-001 JDOE SU01 2008-07-28 09:45:24 ENDUSER
2. critical action rules
a) SM30 S_TABU_DIS 02 FC31 = open and close FI posting period
b) SU01 S_USER_GRP ACTVT 06 = Delete users
---> will the "Search Critical Action Alerts" functionality report JDOE or not ? That is, will SAP GRC take the permissions into account yes or no ? If not, than we have false positives.
Thanks - Sam

Simon,
Thanks for the reply
Can we conclude as follows :
"SAP GRC Risk and Remediation alert monitoring and alert notification do not take into account any function permissions settings before, during or after alert analysis. By this logic, users will be reported as soon as alertlog.txt line items correspond with items from the action tab as part of functions, regardless the fact those users' user buffer does not have the necessary permissions as specified within that same function."
I have noticed your email suffix sap.com --> Can I consider your answer as an official answer from SAP to my question ?

HS.EXP does not take into account the Value member and the source

Hello,
The formula is put in the "Entity Curr Adjs" part of the Sub Calculate.
The expression is the following and apply for one entity (Holding method) I filtered previously and the ICP Entity has proportionnal method with 50% rate:
HS.Exp "A#5420.I#[ICP None].C1#REC.C2#[None].C3#[None].C4#Recla_IAS_Aut_RetS_5=
A#5340.V#[Contribution].E#Logista_E_TBCO.I#UTE_O.C1#CLO.C2#TotC2.C3#TotC3.C4#TotC4"
The data I would like to retrieve is the one in Contribution Value as I put on the source part of the expression.
And yet, the data I get is the one of the Entity Currency and Proportion Value, which is different because the ICP has proportionnal method (50%) and the Contribution value is the result of Proportion - Elimination values.
To sum up: I obtain a data of 50 instead of 25.
I checked that the data I see in my form corresponds to the source parameters but it seems that it does not take into account the Value parameter.
Could it be that it is not possible to use a Contribution Value source for an Entity Currency Adjs destination?
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Julien

Hi,
I see another problem in what you're trying to do. First, let me state what you're trying to establish: you are trying to get a value from one entity (say A) to another entity (say B), be it at [Proportion], [Elimination], [Contribution], ...
My question is: how can you know that during the consolidation process, by the time your code runs on B, A has already been processed and [Proportion], [Elimination] are not empty (or contain values from a previous consolidation run)?
The answer is "You don't". Theoretically, you have no control as per the order in which entities are calculated/consolidated during the process. Even more complex is the thing that if you have a multi-core machine, more than one entities may run in parallel, but still you cannot force A to run before B. I have done some tests and I've seen that in a one processor setting the order that entities enter in the process of consolidation matches the order you have placed them in the consolidation tree in metadata. Still this thing is not documented as far as I know and therefore you cannot rely on this.
Finally, I have also seen that in a simple case (B pulls from A), if you run consolidation twice, then you definitely get correct values. By the time you make a change in A, you have to run consolidation twice again to make sure that you get the correct data. I believe that you see that what I'm describing is good for experimenting but not for releasing to a client.
I tend to think of such a design, as a practice to avoid.
--Kostas

Does the SNP optimizer takes into account transportation calendars (time streams)?

Hello,
We're trying to limit the days when a transportation lane can be used by including a transportation calendar(time stream) to the means of transport. The receipt days on certain locations, depend on the source-target location relationship so we don't want to do this through shipping/Receipt calendars at the location Level (/SAPAPO/LOC3).
Example:
Source A - Target X     Receipt days ( Monday-Tuesday)
Source A - Target Y     Receipt days (Friday-Sunday)
Source B - Target X     Receipt days ( Monday-Wednesday)
Source B - Target Y     Receipt days (Thursday-Friday-Saturday)
We've tried this in an heuristic scenario, and it works. But when we run the optimizer, it doesn't seems to take into account the transportation calendars; it just creates distribution orders every day depending on the demand at the target location.
Does anyone knows if the optimizer run should consider transportation calendars, or this functionality is only for heuristics and/or CTM?
Is there another recommended way to model it?
Cesar

Hello Ada,
As you said, the calendar of the transportation resource overrules the transportation calendar (time stream)
I tested after removing the transportation resourced and it now uses the transportation calendar.
However, if a transportation lane has a lead time greater than 24 hours, we need that the system only ships on a specific day from the location source and receives the goods on the next day at the target location.
For this example,
Source A - Target B; Lead time (48 hours)
Shipping is allowed on Monday – Receipts should be on Thursday
if we set Monday through Thursday as working days or periods in any of both types of calendars (resource or time stream) at the means of transport, the system will plan shipments every day from Monday to Thursday, instead of only shipping on Mondays.
Do you know if its possible to have the behavior mentioned above (shipments on Mondays, receipts on Thursdays)?
Best regards

What to take into account to create a custom schema?

Hello, we are going to start the process of migrating from Oracle E-business suites R11.5.10.2 to R12; we have been doing our custom applications into the APPS schema. For this upgrade, we would like to start fresh and move all our custom applications to a custom schema to have control of all the customizations. I need your feedback on what are the things we need to take into account to accomplish that.
Please let me know anything that comes to your mind on what to consider, and if you have a good guidance on how to do it should be great.
Thank you.

user8969211 wrote:
Hello, we are going to start the process of migrating from Oracle E-business suites R11.5.10.2 to R12; we have been doing our custom applications into the APPS schema. For this upgrade, we would like to start fresh and move all our custom applications to a custom schema to have control of all the customizations. I need your feedback on what are the things we need to take into account to accomplish that.
Please let me know anything that comes to your mind on what to consider, and if you have a good guidance on how to do it should be great.Please see these docs/links.
Integrating Custom Applications with Oracle Applications [ID 176852.1]
Step By Step Guide to Creating a Custom Application in Applications 11i [ID 216589.1]
Integrating Custom Objects and Schemas
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E18727_01/doc.121/e12897/T302934T458264.htm#4164796
Can't Open Custom Forms After R12 Upgrade [ID 552010.1]
How To Upgrade 11i Custom Forms To R12 [ID 563258.1]
Accessing Custom Forms After Upgrading From To R12. [ID 451934.1]
Do Not Compile EBS R12 Reports Using rwconverter.sh or Reports Builder from IDS 10gR2 [ID 786794.1]
Using the OracleAS 10.1.2 Forms and Reports Builders with Oracle Applications Release 12 [ID 444248.1]
Thanks,
Hussein

[svn:osmf:] 11242: Updating the Flex project file to take into account the NetStreamContentProtectableTrait 's name change.

Revision: 11242
Author:   [email protected]
Date:     2009-10-28 13:26:52 -0700 (Wed, 28 Oct 2009)
Log Message:
Updating the Flex project file to take into account the NetStreamContentProtectableTrait's name change.
Modified Paths:
    osmf/trunk/framework/MediaFramework/.actionScriptProperties
    osmf/trunk/framework/MediaFramework/.flexLibProperties

Hi,
This topic seems to be related to VBA coding, better to post your question to the forum for Excel Developer
http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/office/en-US/home?forum=exceldev
The reason why we recommend posting appropriately is you will get the most qualified pool of respondents, and other partners who read the forums regularly can either share their knowledge or learn from your interaction with us. Thank you for your understanding.
Tony Chen
TechNet Community Support

[svn:fx-beta1] 7038: Updating Gumbo webtier packaging to take into account the Flash Player 10 requirement , MXML 2009 namespace changes and associated manifests, and new locales.

Revision: 7038
Author:   [email protected]
Date:     2009-05-18 09:31:29 -0700 (Mon, 18 May 2009)
Log Message:
Updating Gumbo webtier packaging to take into account the Flash Player 10 requirement, MXML 2009 namespace changes and associated manifests, and new locales.
QE: Yes, I tried checkintests with the webtier.war distribution and could successfully compile the associated apps. Please test the webtier.war distribution with the larger suite of webtier tests.
Doc: No
Checkintests: Pass
ant package: Successful
Reviewer: Paul
Modified Paths:
    flex/sdk/branches/beta1/modules/webtier/j2ee/coldfusion/build.xml
    flex/sdk/branches/beta1/webapps/webtier/WEB-INF/flex/flex-config.xml
    flex/sdk/branches/beta1/webapps/webtier/build.xml

Sort column doesn't take into account new rows

Hi,
I'm using jdev 11.1.2.3.0
When I add new rows to table and then try to sort any column before commit.
The sort does not take the new rows into account when performing the sort.
How could I solve this problem without commit?
Thanks

You have to set the query executioner mode to in memory so that the temporary rows are also taken into account when sorting.
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E16764_01/apirefs.1111/e10653/oracle/jbo/ViewObject.html

SQL-tab / refresh button: does not take into account renamed constraint.

I discovered a small bug:
1) find or create a table with system generated constraint names (SYS_C007289)
2) open that table in SQL Developer (I'm using 3.0.04.34). On the constraints tab, there will be the SYS% constraints. On the SQL-tab, the constraints will be shown without a name (simply "not null" for example).
3) Return to the Constraints tab and use Actions / Constraints / Rename single to rename a constraint.
4) return to the SQL tab and press the Refresh button. Unexpectedly, the new constraint name is still not in the SQL!
5) close the entire window/tab for the table
6) re-open that table.
7) go to the SQL-tab: now the name of the constraint is in the code.
As shown above, the workaround is easy, so this is a very minor bug-let.

Looks like you add an ActionListener to your button <next> every time yuou call buildGui() and, believe it or not, adding a listener more than once triggers additional events. Thus, it's okay on your first loop but on the second it now has 2 listeners and thus will skip 3 and go to four. After this it now has three listeners and will skip 4 and 5 and go to 6 etc, etc.
// in your buldGui() method
System.out.println("prints next");
frameContainer.add(next);
next.addActionListener(this);
System.out.println("it has already printed next");
exit.addActionListener(this);
frameContainer.add(exit);

I want to put an app on the store..can anyone advise of any hidden costs I should take into account?

I want to put an app on the store and was wondering if anyone can advise of any costs (hidden as well) that you think I should be aware of....thanks

Hello Folks!
I hope you all are well. I am new to this so please kindly help me if you can. I am goin to take the ACMT exam very soon and planning to undertake 2 x exams i.e. 10.7 troubleshoot 9L0-063 exam as well as 9L0-010. Is there any training material other than the Apple official material (I bought it already)? Have you guys done the ACMT? What is the format of it? Is there any material do you have that you think you can help me with?
I would really appreciate any help in this regard.
Thank you all

How do you take into account a differential signal using daqmx?

I created a channel using 2 separate voltage sources. However, both of these voltage sources are differentials across other channels on the DAQ board. Is there a way to set my physical channels as something like "differential w/ channel xxx"?
Solved!
Go to Solution.

Yes, you should be all set. Here's a good read on wiring considerations: http://www.ni.com/white-paper/3344/en/
Using LabVIEW: 7.1.1, 8.5.1 & 2013

Sales orders ans reservations not taken into account on MPS / MRP

Hello,
I am implementing the MPS / MRP and I have the following problem:
I have modified the necessary material master fields to take into account some materials on the MPS / MRP execution. These fields are MRP type, Lot Size, Strategy group and Availability Check.
Then, executing the MPS / MRP I have realised that only the sales orders and reservations created after the material master modifications are taken into account when I execute the MPS / MRP.
I suppose this is because the sales orders and reservations created before the material master modifications did not create the requirements because the availability check was not set for the material and so on... but I need to take into account these "old" reservations and sales orders .
Is there any way to "update" these orders and reservations?? Or I need to delete them and create new ones??
There are several sales orders and reservations created before the material master modifications. I think there have to be an standard way to update them.
Thank you very much in advanced,
Jordi.

Dear,
Are you getting these reservation in MD04?
Check the Planning file entry for these material in MD21 if not then create it through MD20 and take MRP run with planning mode -3 Deleted and recreated. And Processing key NETCH.
Also check the The firmed receipt is within the rescheduling horizon. The rescheduling horizon is set in Customizing for the MRP group (Transaction OPPR, Table T438M). A default value can be predefined in the Customizing of plant data (Transaction OPPQ, Table T399D). define the longer duration for it.
The firmed receipt (the MRP element) participates in the rescheduling check. You can set which MRP elements participate in the rescheduling check in the Customizing of the plant data (Transaction OPPQ).
Else you can carry out modification A using the MD_CHANGE_MRP_DATA BAdI and the CONSIDER_RESB method without making a modification.
Regards,
R.Brahmankar

CK11N Follow-up material not taken into account when costing

We are running the standard cost with quantity structure and we have detected that all the follow-up information is not taken into account to determine the bill of materials that will be used to calculate the standard cost.
SAP helpdesk has answered me the following:
"The situation in product cost planning is we do not check availability of any material stocks, and therefore we cannot provide the same functionality as MRP. You will have to create a new BOM that includes
the follow-up material or apply the modification to take into account the follow-up part."
Please, if anyone knows any user-exit we could use to develop something to fix it, we would appreciate it very much. It is a normal process and we can not say it does not work.
Regards, and waiting for any solution.
Yolanda.

Dear,
Are you getting these reservation in MD04?
Check the Planning file entry for these material in MD21 if not then create it through MD20 and take MRP run with planning mode -3 Deleted and recreated. And Processing key NETCH.
Also check the The firmed receipt is within the rescheduling horizon. The rescheduling horizon is set in Customizing for the MRP group (Transaction OPPR, Table T438M). A default value can be predefined in the Customizing of plant data (Transaction OPPQ, Table T399D). define the longer duration for it.
The firmed receipt (the MRP element) participates in the rescheduling check. You can set which MRP elements participate in the rescheduling check in the Customizing of the plant data (Transaction OPPQ).
Else you can carry out modification A using the MD_CHANGE_MRP_DATA BAdI and the CONSIDER_RESB method without making a modification.
Regards,
R.Brahmankar

Report painter: Financial statement debit credit indicator taken into account?

Hi,
When I create a report with report painter (FGI0) It does not take into account the debit / credit indicator of the FS statement.
Is this standard SAP or do I miss a setting?
kr,
Klundert

Hi Wolfgang,
Please refer to OSS note 663945. This will give you the transfer rule mapping for 0GLACCEXT.
Hope this helps.
Thanks,
Vivek

Instance Time taking into account Daylight Standard Time

When scheduling a report, the instance time does not seem to take into account Daylight Standard Time. This is probably because the United States is different than the rest of the world. Any chance this will be fixed in upcoming releases? Either that or I can just wait a few more weeks for the world to catch up.
Instance Time: 3/27/2009 08:30:21
Actual Time: 3/27/2009 09:30:21

Hi Mike,
You are correct, the times you mention do not take the early daylight savings time change into account.
You should see the times become correct again when we hit the original time change date which I think would have been Sunday April 5 this year.
Cheers,
Steve

Print() method takes into account Acrobat's settings

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for