Print quality compared to Photoshop

Hi,
I'm taking a photography course. The instructor wants us to print our photos. I've been using iPhoto to organize my photos, so naturally I printed them with iPhoto, too. Unfortunately, the prints are quite dark, and shadows are blocked, i.e., lacking in detail which is visible on my calibrated monitors. The instructor has recommended using another product, perhaps Photoshop or Photoshop Elements. I downloaded an evualation copy of PSE, and the prints are indeed better. They show a bit more detail in the shadows. The strange thing is, though, PSE makes the best prints when I configure it to let the printer handle color matching, and when I set ColorSync (in the usual OS X print dialog) to Automatic, having made a profile built specifically for my printer the default profile. I had been led to believe that it was the ability of Photoshop to do the color matching that made the difference; iPhoto, of course, always leaves color matching to the printer, or, more correctly, to the printer driver.
So my question is, has anybody compared the print quality of Aperture with that of Photoshop. I understand that, in Aperture, the color matching can also be configured, similar to Photoshop.
Some background information: I am printing on an HP OfficeJet 6500, for which I have had a profile made. This is probably overkill, in the sense that HP never intended the printer to produce photo quality printers and all sorts of contortions were required to print the profiling targets without the driving doing any color matching. I understand that printers which use several black or grey inks will handle shadow details better. Nevertheless, I think the print quality is presently sufficient for the purpose of the course.
Regards,
Richard

Similar Messages

Epson Artisan 810 and Snow Leopard and Photoshop....Print quality??

I'm a little lost to be honest. I'm not sure where my problem is...Photoshop, Epson, or Snow Leopard
I'm using Photoshop CS4 to edit my photos. I've constrained my cropping to designated print sizes, thus pixelation changes as well.
For example to create an 8x10 from a jpeg file uploaded to my computer from my camera (a sony cybershot dsc-w170 if you need to know, which by default upload files as jpegs), here is the following image info:
3000 pixels x 2400 pixels
25.4 cm x 20.32 cm
with a resolution of 300 pixels/inch
I have the resolution set to BEST and when I print I've tried both document and proof quality (with printer color managment)
I'm using photo paper, gloss, but not Epson brand paper (don't know how much that might be contributing to the problem, if at all).
When I go to print my image the quality off the Epson is HORRIBLE.
Is there something I'm missing or doing wrong?? How do I get better print quality?
There is no option/method of changing the print type (document or photo) on the printer itself, which is obviously made to work best with a PC. So that leaves me with Photoshops options as far as I know.
Although I don't know if there's a way to change default print quality settings within Snow Leopard, or if I even have to.
Whatever the case may be...ultimately I need to know the following:
paper brand/quality matters?
what program should I be trying to print photos from (photoshop, iphoto, whatever)
how to manipulate the photo quality within whichever program I should be using
and anything else important that I may not have thought of
Thanks so much. I've seen great reviews of photo print quality for this printer, so I have hope that this problem can be remedied....?

Your printer is supported by the latest update supplied by Apple.
Cheap paper usually results in cheap looking results.
I'm using HP paper with a HP printer with a Canon Eos Rebel camera that outputs
something like 2592 x 1944.
CS4 handels these .jpgs quite fine.
I would first buy some premium Epson paper and see what happens.

Is the PRINT quality of Aperture's RAW different than Photoshop's?

I've seen various comments suggesting that Aperture doesn't handle raw files as well as photoshop. Is this just a screen issue or it is also a print quality issue?

Depends on how Aperture is handling this. The
preferred internal rendering intent is used in ICC
applications that don’t specify a conversion. And you
can easily change this tag.
How, where? I'd LOVE to know.
IF Aperture actually
tells it’s conversion engine “Use Relative
Colorimetric”, that’s what you get.
I'm pretty sure it does, but I'd still like to know if you think there's a way to change this, and run some test prints. I can match aperture's prints exactly by setting the rendering intent in PShop to rel. colorimetric. Sadly, for most of the good art papers, the shadow quality is much better using a perceptual intent, so that means printing through photoshop right now.
At least in Photoshop (and I’d assume Aperture), soft
proofs are always Relative Colorimetric with black
point compensation. So the soft proof should be OK.
Not true, at least in CS2. You set the rendering intent for soft proofing under Proof setup.

Poor print quality through photoshop CS 6 using HP 7520

Hi Im having poor print quality (muddy) dense, I might not have the proper color management or printer profile loaded on the HP 7520. using Windows 7 (64) bit.
Thanks
Bill

Well, I guess it is all about the paper.
I started using Premium Ink Jet paper which cleaned up the printing a great deal. Standard quality settings now produce just faint imperfections but higher quality settings eliminate them entirely.
One of those "you get what you pay for" issues I guess.

Print quality on Epson Stylus Photo R800

Hi...
I'm using Lightroom 3.6 and an Epson Stylus Photo R800. This printer is capable of printing very high quality pictures, as I know by using it for almost 5 years.
I have bought Lightroom about 6 month ago. I have tried anything I can think off to get those fabulus pictures out of my Epson printer. I alterd color managment settings, changed print resolutions, downloaded new printerdriver, ... Nothing works. Print quality when printing from Lightroom is very poor. Bad colors (dark), stripes over the whole image, it looks like nothing realy.
One of the things that I noticed is that the maximum resolution for printing in LR is 720 ppi. My Epson is capable of 1550 ppi.
I see a lot of discussion going about print quality with lightroom... I think however this is a more basic problem. My print qualiti is realy very very bad...
Does anyone have similar problems or (even better) a hint to a solution?
Note,
When I export a picture to .jpg format (I shoot in RAW only), and print this directly from Windows, I do get the perfect picture a was used to... I cannot believe that Lightroom is unable to do the same.
Thanks!
Erik.

Sorry for calling you 'Frank' Frans...
Vriendelijke groet,
Erik Henken.
Op 3 jan. 2012 om 20:23 heeft "c.frans w" <[email protected]> het volgende geschreven:
Re: Print quality on Epson Stylus Photo R800
created by c.frans w in Photoshop Lightroom - View the full discussion
I would shine some light on your remark:
One of the things that I noticed is that the maximum resolution for printing in LR is 720 ppi. My Epson is capable of 1550 ppi.
I see a lot of discussion going about print quality with lightroom...
My name is :
Frans
Replies to this message go to everyone subscribed to this thread, not directly to the person who posted the message. To post a reply, either reply to this email or visit the message page: http://forums.adobe.com/message/4116097#4116097
To unsubscribe from this thread, please visit the message page at http://forums.adobe.com/message/4116097#4116097. In the Actions box on the right, click the Stop Email Notifications link.
Start a new discussion in Photoshop Lightroom by email or at Adobe Forums
For more information about maintaining your forum email notifications please go to http://forums.adobe.com/message/2936746#2936746.

Photo book print quality: large vs. medium (both softcover)

hello all,
I just wanted to share my experience about the difference in print quality between the medium softcover and large (in my case, softcover) books from iPhoto, something I wondered about before I took the plunge and ordered them.
I recently received copies of both, ordered a week apart, both using the 300 dpi hack, but unfortunately of diff't photos in each, so the comparison won't be too scientific.
First impressions: the photos in the large softcover seemed to me better than the medium. You can detect some very fine dots with the naked eye, in the places where a color shades into white. Overall, not objectionable at all, especially at a reasonable viewing distance. Akin to a decent/average inkjet photo. Meanwhile, the medium format struck me as having a worse print resolution, like a photo in a newspaper or cheaply printed magazine. The halftone pattern seemed more noticeable.
However, on closer inspection, side by side, I can see the halftone dots in each, and I wonder if they're actually printed at the same resolution. I think it was partly the bigger size of the average photo in the large book that convinced me it had a better resolution, and the smaller photos in a medium book can make the whole thing look bad. Also, I can definitely detect banding from the halftone pattern in the medium book that I don't notice in the large; but could this be due to the subject matter in the medium (blurred washes of muted color) more than a print resolution difference? Perhaps.
My conclusion: while it could be that the print resolution on the large is slightly better, I suspect my perception of the quality difference is based more on photo size and subject matter (sharp focus w/patterns, texture, moderate detail rather than empty color looks best). Still, despite my suspicion that the print resolution is the same, I can't shake the sense the large looks a little better.
Which is too bad in a way, as I think the medium has a lot going for it: it's cheaper than the large, and I actually much prefer to have a series of single, full-bleed images at 6x8 than two or three or more cluttered together on a bigger page for the same price. Plus I find the peek-a-boo cutout on the cover of the large book a bit cheesy.
So if you're going to go medium, I would definitely stay away from those six-photos-a-page layouts, especially if you have people in your small photos: their features will be degraded enough they start to look a little funny/unrecognizable. Bigger is better.
And if anyone has the same photo at the same size in two differently sized books to compare, that would settle things.
Also, I had a number of grayscale scans that I converted to rgb before adding to iPhoto, and the b&w photos printed in the book look great. While I would describe them as 'cool', I don't detect a noticeable color cast, and the blacks are decent.
Overall, as an amateur whose expectations were aimed a bit low, I'm pleased with both for the price, and will look to large for special occasions, medium for everyday photosets.

You're confusing two similar though technically different things.
You have the dpi (dot's per inch in the raster file) resolution of the images (assuming the image will not be reduced or enlarged) of 300 dpi - that is a static resolution and it one of two resolution settings that affect the quality of a printed image.
I was told the books are printed cmyk with screening so the other resolution that you have no control over is the "LPI" or "Lines per Inch" of the printing process. The CMYK separations are each printed at a different angle to achieve the full color effect.
The soft cover books appear to be printed at a lesser lpi than the hard cover books which would give the images a courser look to them.
I have not compared the books under a loop so this is going on what I was told.

Lack of print options when using photoshop elements 10 i.e. paper type

When printing from Photoshop Elements 10 on my MacBook Pro (File Print) there is no where to select paper type or print quality or there doesn't appear to be unlike when selecting print from iphoto. What have I missed? as there must be a way!

From the Print dialogue box click on the Show Details box at the bottom.

Very Frustrating! Printing from Preview or Photoshop - not happening again!

It's Christmas time, and I'm printing my home made cards... so I've done all the artwork, printed a test from Photoshop, and that was fine... make some changes, and now it won't print! Exported it all as a PDF, try printing from Preview, and the same thing happens.
Same thing happened a couple of weeks ago, but I can't remember how I fixed it! The job comes up in the printer spool, and then vanishes. Looking at the printer history log, it thinks it's printed it, but nothing. I can do a test page from the printer dialog, I can print from the web, but not from Photoshop or Preview
Help!
This is driving me nuts I tell you!
Cheers

First, do you have the original PSD to go back to (and if you don't, you now know to never kill off your source). Second, the JPG now has no fonts embedded, textures etc are irrelevant. So what is the resolution? Check out the rez of your printer and make sure the document's rez is no higher. Generally, anything more than 600dpi for home use is wasted, though some of the really high quality inkjets can go much higher. If your jpeg is very high rez (or if its dimensions are really big) resize it to be exactly the print size and try again.

HP1280C print quality problem

So I finally got my friend to upgrade his aging powermac G3 (with OSX and pagemaker 6.5 etc) to a new Mac Mini, He bought inDesign CS2 and Photoshop CS2 etc. for it (got a good deal) so I thought all was well.
Then he goes to try and print one of his pagemaker files with it, and thats when the problems start, the greys aren't grey, they are blocks of random red/green/blue pixels, black lines aren't crisp but have jaggy edges, printed letters aren't crisp and black but have pixels all around them, sort of like it's trying to print anti-aliased but the printer interprets it as black & white and dithers everything.
I don't know how to fix it, short of buying a different printer? He makes publications for a living, things have to look good, and they did with the crusty old computer.
so, any suggestions on improving the print quality? we played with the settings in the print dialog, like forcing color or B&W, didn't seem to do anything.

Which driver are you/he using?
Do you have Rosetta installed, so that legacy drivers can work?

Improving photo print quality

I had to delete CS3 and re-install it and now photos printed on my Epson picture mate do not look good. I had this problem before, but don't remember the exact solution. I could not find specific instructions for getting the best photo print quality by searching in the forums. I would think this would be a big topic. We all want to print the best quality pictures and once the instructions are well documented, I would think they would be easy to find. Could someone help me out? I am using Leopard.
Thanks,
Tom

If it's just a color setting, you shouldn't have to download anything.
I'm not sure if it's the same method in CS4 as in CS2, which I'm using, but you could just open Photoshop, select Edit from the top of the screen, and click on Color Settings…
In there, you can choose one of the presets from the "Settings" drop-down menu: Monitor Color, North America General Purpose 2, North America Prepress 2, etc. Or you can manually select from various CMYK, RGB, Gray, and Spot working spaces below that. Just use whichever works best for you.
Regarding not finding what you're looking for easily, I have a feeling it has something to do with lack of specifics. Your original post didn't really mention in what way your photos looked bad. If it's a color thing, are your photos too dark? Too light? Too blue/yellow? Or is it, instead, a resolution issue (too pixellated and/or blurry)? "My photos look bad" doesn't really provide enough info.

How to change print quality on cp1515n

We recently purchased a HP CP1515n colour printer to replace a HP 2600n printer. The print quality is excellent but the problem is the printer (CP1515n) is using alot of toner compared to the 2600n. For example the black toner which is rated at 2200 prints will run out before it does 700 prints according to the web console for the printer. Is there anyway to reduce the amount of toner used by dropping the print quality ?
On most printers in the quality settings in the driver (printer properties) you can chose an economy quality setting such as economy, draft or low which uses alot less toner. On this printer there is only one setting ImageREt 3600 which uses alot of toner due to the way it prints. I have upgraded the firmware on the printer, downloaded the latest driver and checked all the manuals etc but can't find how to do this.
Could you please help.
Thanks.

The only solution I found was to turn off the out of toner warning on the printer. It then continues to print normally for a long time after the message starts to appear. The new toners in the UK are £50 each (including postage) which makes £200 for a full set but a new printer is about £150 normally. Seems strange how the price of a print + toners is alot less than the price of the toners. I also found some CP1515n's for sale at £100 each so bought one to use its toners, which works out at £25 per toner. HP's pricing policy on toners is a bit strange.

Printing quality with Remote desktop technologies

Hello,
I manage several servers using Remote Desktop Technologies : 2003 R2 Terminal services, 2008 R2 RDS, 32/64 bits...
I upgraded recently to Adobe Reader X and I observe a strange behaviour : when I connect to theses servers with my RDP client, fonts are not the same as displayed, letters are glued without any spaces between them BUT if I connect to the console (HP ILO or vmware console), print quality is fine !!!!
I'm still making comparative tests but I'm stuck.
Any ideas ? I didn't find any thread related to this problem in the forums.
Kind regards,
Sebastien

Hi!
I have the same problem as you!
Other applications works fine with printredirects, but not Adobe Reader X. I have tried to modify the GPO to disable Remote Desktop Easy Print as i seen on Microsoft forums to try on printing errors, but no luck.
I have checked that the printerdriver seems to be the correct one for the local printer, but it does not matter.
Have you found out anything please let me know.
Best regards

3.2 Print Quality

I have my printer set to 'draft' by default in the printer settings in XP. When I go to print in version 3.2 I change this to 'best' in the preferences, but the printed page comes out in draft quality? The only way I can get 3.2 to print in 'best' is to change it in the XP printer settings. Shouldn't version 3.2 change the settings in preferences?

Hi Joyce,
When you say all your pictures are blurry, do you mean they come out blurry after you print them using Adobe Photoshop Album Starter Edition 3.2. If they are, then I suspect it to be related to the issue mentioned in this tread. To get better quality prints, I would change your default printer settings to the picture quality you prefer before you open up the Adobe software to print. It's too bad that any has to go through these extra steps, but it's the only way to get the prefered resolution because changing these setting within the Adobe software doesn't seem to work (until they fix this flaw or bug) in the software.
Regarding the message about missing photos, this might be related to the software losing track of which folder your pictures are in. This sometimes happens when you cut and paste pictures out of the original location and into another folder. If you imported the photos into Adobe Starter Edition from one location, then move them later, they have to be reconnected in the software. Within the software, go to File, Reconnect All Missing Files, if a Browse window pops up, search for the new location where your pictures are stored on your hard drive, and select that folder, then select that picture, click Open or OK. Once you connect one photo, the software is smart enough to connect all the other unlinked photos in that location.
Hope this helps.

Poor Print Quality with Switch to Mac

I have just replaced a Windows PC with a MacBook Pro (running OSX Yosemite, Retina screen, Lightroom 5.6 & Photoshop Elements 11 installed). Printer is an Epson Stylus PX720WD. All latest firmware, drivers etc installed.
Problem is that the print quality using LR & PSE on the Mac is dreadful. The image looks way underexposed and there are blank white edges to dark objects against a light background.
Printing the same image on my wife's Windows PC (running PSE11) and using the same Epson gives perfect print quality.
The difference is evidently Mac vs Windows. (same image, same program, same printer)
On Mac (in the LR or PSE print menu), there are few options for paper type, print quality (DPI) etc. (In LR I only see the option to toggle '240 ppp' on or off)
Whereas in Windows I get multiple options for paper type and print resolution (up to 720 dpi).
Ultimately, my processing workflow is LR on Mac, and I want to get them playing nice with the printing (rather than being obliged to export my finished images to another Window PC for printing).
Any help or suggestions on how to resolve are very much appreciated

All adjustments to arrive at the final image (to be printed) are on the Mac with LR.
With LR I have tried both 'Managed by Printer' and 'Adobe RGB' (in the 'Colour Management' section. If I select 'Others' (Instead of the default Managed by Printer) I get a long list of options : Adobe RGB, Display, and a long list of various Nikon & Epson alternatives. So far I have only tried the Adobe RGB and it was actually worse).
In PSE I leave it as Managed by Printer. But get the very different menu options in Mac vs Win (strange!).
The monitor on the Win PC is low quality but the image looks ok (tone, colour). And the printed image looks perfect - exactly as it was finished on the Mac.

How can i order a new printer head for my photoshop 7250e

How can i order a new printer head for my photoshop 7250e Is there a number i can ring to speak to someone or email address i can use or a web page where i can order one
or a list of agents i can use to get it from
Finding simple information seems impossible, no where does it mention spares or replacements
I have tried a lot of fault finding am convinced this is the problem

Hello NigelH1,
The Print Head for the Photosmart 7250 is not available outside HP.
Please call HP Tech Support for further assistance.
If you are in US , the toll free # is 1-800-474-6836 .
If you are not in US , then log on to www.hp.com , at bottom-left corner there is a world map icon, click on it and then select the region you belong to, which would then provide support options for you for that region.
Regards,
Jabzi
Give Kudos to say "thanks" by clicking on the "thumps Up icon" .
Click "Accept as Solution" if it solved your problem, so others can find it.
Although I am an HP employee, I am speaking for myself and not for HP.

Print quality compared to Photoshop

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for