Printdatagrid with more columns

I have a huge data in my dataGrid like 18 Columns and
thousands of rows.
I want to print all the data, even I tried using
"PrintDataGrid" . I prints all rows but it fails to print all the
columns.
Pls kindly tell me the solutions... .
:sad;

I have the same problem: The Flex PrintDataGrid is good at
telling me that only X rows will fit on the page, but I don't see
how to do the same thing with columns. Ideally, I'd like to be able
to define header rows and columns, which would be automatically
printed on each page, in addition to the data. For example, a table
with a name column, followed by 24 month columns would print
multiple pages with the name column followed by the remaining month
columns.
This seems like a very common scenario, and I'm surprised
there doesn't seem to be an obvious solution.

Similar Messages

  • ALV Report Output Print issue with more Columns

    Hi Experts ,
                             I'm facing an issue while printing an ALV report which has around 22 columns .If i reduce the column display in the code . I'm able to print but not with 22 columns.. I have used Line-size = 1023 and line-count = 60 , but still the problem persists .
    I also searched in SDN with similar issue but managed to get only the above solution which is not working .
    Any other ways of doing it , kindly suggest .
    Many Thanks,
    Kumaran

    175 characters is the maximum number of characters that can be generated in a line of a spool (next characters are stored on the next line of the spool). When the spool is printed, these line feeds are respected.
    What is possible (I don't know) is that ALV chooses its own format type instead of the format type you have chosen when you run your program in background. To check that, just look at spool attributes (SP01).

  • Report with more columns than will fit on a page

    <p>I&#39;m just beginning to use Crystal Reports (30-day Developer eval). I&#39;m trying to create a report with more fields than will fit across one page. The "extra" fields seem to wrap on the first page. I&#39;d really like to print the report across two pages, like Excel does with its "Fit to 2 pages wide" option.</p><p>Is this possible in Crytal? What do folks do when their report is "wider" than the width of the page? </p><p>&#160;</p>

    This is a relatively easy fix. Basically you need to make a huge default page for your printer, and use that layout when printing.
    1. On Windows, go to Start -> Printers & Faxes
    2. Click on File -> Server Properties
    3. Check 'Create a new form'
    4. Change the form name field to something you can remember... I called mine GIGANTIC CRYSTAL LAYOUT
    5. At the bottom change the units to the size you would like. I use 100" wide x 14" tall.Â
    6. Click Save Form when you are done.
    7. Then click 'Close'
    In crystal start your report (or create a new one) and change your printer settings to use this new form. If it doesn't show up under your default printer, try changing the printer crystal is looking at, and selecting your new form.
    Â Hope that helps.

  • JList with more Columns?

    Hi!
    Can a jlist have more than one "column"? Or is the only possibillity to make something similar like in the windows explorer a table?
    thanks
    qedi

    Hi!
    Yes you are right, a table is sounder.
    I have the problem, that i like to fill the table dynamic and therefor I created two vectors, one with my data an one for the columnnames. According to the documentation i used following statement to create the table:
    Vector data = new Vector();
    data.addElement(..);
    Vector columns = new Vector();
    columns.addElement(...);
    JTable myTable = new JTable(data, columns);
    But I get an Exception. I don't know which one.
    Made I something wrong??
    qedi

  • More Rows or More Columns ?

    I have a table (a form) where 50 attributes have to be filled for each id. There may be some extra attributes be added or removed in this form.
    Which is better
    1) Going with more columns (50+) less rows.
    2) Going with less columns and more rows.
    I am more inclined towards more rows because of the main disadvantage of adding and removing the columns.
    Any descriptive answer will be of good help (any reference will also do good)

    CP wrote:
    Can you please elaborate on this. I have tried 2NF before but not 3NF.It actually sounds as though you are trying to design your database using some form of Entity Attribute Value (EAV) model, where you store a row for each attribute of an entity.
    e.g.
    +-----------+--------------+-----------------------+
    | Entity_ID | Attribute_ID | Attribute Value       |
    +-----------+--------------+-----------------------+
    |         1 |            1 | Mr.                   |
    |         1 |            2 | John                  |
    |         1 |            3 | Smith                 |
    |         2 |            1 | Mr.                   |
    |         2 |            2 | Joe                   |
    |         2 |            3 | Bloggs                |
    |         3 |            1 | Mrs                   |
    |         3 |            2 | Tiggy                 |
    |         3 |            3 | Winkle                |
    +-----------+--------------+-----------------------+This apparently makes for a very flexible data model because, if you need to add more attributes for an entity, we can just assign another Attribute_ID for this new attribute (e.g. 4 for a persons date of birth) and then store rows with data for those attributes.
    The problem with this however is that it is not using a relational database in the best way, and leads to major overheads in programming and consildating the data back to the single entity. EAV models have very few valid uses, and have been tried by many in the past to create "generic" or "flexible" database designs, typcially ending in disaster.
    Here's a good story to illustrate a company that had a developer create them an EAV model database...
    http://www.simple-talk.com/opinion/opinion-pieces/bad-carma/
    The proper design for a database would put all the attributes for an entity as individual columns on a single row. The required attributes should be known about at design time so, in most cases, there shouldn't be much need later on to add new attributes, and if there is, it's usually easy enough to add a new column to the table to cater for it, or in some cases create another relational table store the additional attribute(s) (especially if there is several attributes to be added). This is the nature of 3rd normal form (3NF)...
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third_normal_form

  • Excel 2007 to Sql server table. Column with more than 255 characters.

    Hi there,
    I am facing a problem while converting data from Excel 2007 to SQL server 2005 table. I am using BIDS 2005.I have an excel file where one particular column has more than 255 characters. I use OLEDB connection for excel file as there is no driver for Excel
    2007 in BIDS2005. I am using Microsoft Office 12.0 Access Database Engine OLE DB Provider for Excel file.
    Next, I changed advanced properties for the column to DT_NTEXT. But when I am getting errors on execution. They are:
    [OLE DB Source [1949]] Error: SSIS Error Code DTS_E_OLEDBERROR.  An OLE DB error has occurred. Error code: 0x80040E21.
    [OLE DB Source [1949]] Error: Failed to retrieve long data for column "action".
    [OLE DB Source [1949]] Error: There was an error with output column "action" (2046) on output "OLE DB Source Output" (1959). The column status returned was: "DBSTATUS_UNAVAILABLE".
    [OLE DB Source [1949]] Error: SSIS Error Code DTS_E_INDUCEDTRANSFORMFAILUREONERROR.  The "output column "action" (2046)" failed because error code 0xC0209071 occurred, and the error row disposition on "output column "action"
    (2046)" specifies failure on error. An error occurred on the specified object of the specified component.  There may be error messages posted before this with more information about the failure.
    Please advise on how can I deal with columns having more than 255 characters in Excel file.
    Thanks!

    Here is what your connection string should look like for excel source
    Provider
    =Microsoft.Jet.OLEDB.4.0;Data
    Source=c:\temp\test.xls;Extended
    Properties="EXCEL 8.0;HDR=YES";
    http://sqlworkday.blogspot.com/

  • Is there a way to open CSV files with more than 255 columns?

    I have a CSV file with more than 255 columns of data.  It's a fairly standard export of social media data that shows volume of posts by day for the past year, from which I can analyze the data and publish customized charts. Very easy in Excel but I'm hitting the Numbers limit of 255 columns per table. Is there a way to work around the limitation? Perhaps splitting the CSV in two? The data shows up in the CSV file when I open via TextEdit, so it's there. Just can't access it in Numbers. And it's not very usable/useful for me in TextEdit.
    Regards,
    Tim

    You might be better off with Excel. Even if you could find a way to easily split the CSV file into two tables, it would be two tables when you want only one.  You said you want to make charts from this data.  While a series on a chart can be constructed from data in two different tables, to do so takes a few extra steps for each series on the chart.
    For a test to see if you want to proceed, make two small tables with data spanning the tables and make a chart from that data.  Make the chart the normal way using the data in the first table then repeat the following steps for each series
    Select the series in the chart
    Go to Format sidebar
    Click in the "Value" box
    Add a comma then select the data for this series from the second chart
    Press Return
    If there is an easier way to do this, maybe someone else will chime in with that info.

  • How to create a table with more tan 20 columns

    I created a A4 landscape document to make a calendar for the next year.
    To add the date information I need to insert a table with 32 columns (name of month + 31 days). It should be possible to create a table with a over all width of 29.7 cm (consisting of 1 column of 4.9 cm and 31 columns with 0.8 cm)?
    Remark: Yet reduced all indention's (? German: Einzug) and other spacers and the size of used font of the table.

    Hello Till,
    unfortunatly Pages connot create a table with more than 20 columns. This is no question of size or place.
    But you can create two tables, set the most right border of the fist table to "no line" and align the second table (with the other 12 columns) at the right side of the first table. Now you have "one" table with 32 columns.
    I have done this with my driving book (Fahrtenbuch, um es korrekt zu schreiben and it works fine.
    Frank.

  • Table with more than 35 columns

    Hello All.
    How can one work with a table with more than 35 columns
    on JDev 9.0.3.3?
    My other question is related to this.
    Setting Entities's Beans properties from a Session Bean
    bought up the error, but when setting from inside the EJB,
    the bug stays clear.
    Is this right?
    Thank you

    Thank you all for reply.
    Here's my problem:
    I have an AS400/DB2 Database, a huge and an old one.
    There is many COBOL Programs used to communicate with this DB.
    My project is to transfer the database with the same structure and the same contents to a Linux/ORACLE System.
    I will not remake the COBOL Programs. I will use the existing one on the Linux System.
    So the tables of the new DB should be the same as the old one.
    That’s why I can not make a relational DB. I have to make an exact migration.
    Unfortunately I have some tables with more than 5000 COLUMNS.
    Now my question is:
    can I modify the parameters of the ORACE DB to make it accept Tables and Views with more than 1000 columns, If not, is it possible to make a PL/SQL Function that simulate a table, this function will insert/update/select data from many other small tables (<1000 columns). I want to say a method that make the ORACLE DB acting like if it has a table with a huge number of columns;
    I know it's crazy but any idea please.

  • Spatial index creation for table with more than one geometry columns?

    I have table with more than one geometry columns.
    I'v added in user_sdo_geom_metadata table record for every column in the table.
    When I try to create spatial indexes over geometry columns in the table - i get error message:
    ERROR at line 1:
    ORA-29855: error occurred in the execution of ODCIINDEXCREATE routine
    ORA-13203: failed to read USER_SDO_GEOM_METADATA table
    ORA-13203: failed to read USER_SDO_GEOM_METADATA table
    ORA-06512: at "MDSYS.SDO_INDEX_METHOD", line 8
    ORA-06512: at line 1
    What is the the solution?

    I'v got errors in my user_sdo_geom_metadata.
    The problem does not exists!

  • Creation of Z reports for client adding two more column that is Purcahse order and delivery dates with Internal order wise

    HI Experts,
    Can any one help me to add two more column for standard report that is purchase order and delivery dates for Internal order wise.
    But here problem is when i checked with ABAP team they said there is no standard functional module to add two column.
    Please note below :
    Selection criteria is: 1) controlling area
                                  2) Fiscal Year
                                  3) From date and To date
                                  4) Plan Version
                                  5) Order Group.
    My client suggested : S_ALR_87012993 this tcode to run, but we suggested with S_ALR_87013019 as in this tcode we can get all the details
    That is required output fields, as it is showing all details but on yearly basis, he wants this to be period wise and also Abap team is not able to find standard functional module in the second tcode as well.
    Out Put fields to Pop up
    1) Orders.
    2) Budget
    3) Actual
    4) commitment
    5) Alloted
    6) Available
    These are two additional column
    7)Purchase order
    8) Delivery date.
    Require your help to know which all tables are included to extract above out put fields please help me.
    Thanks in Advance.
    Regards,
    Sudesh

    Hi Preeti,
    Thanks for reply, can you please let me know is there any other way to show the output fields.
    As my client is very specific to run the report on period wise, i also tried to execute the standard tcode S_ALR_87013019 and were we are getting all the required outputs to pop up but this is on year wise, but we can also check by period basis by clicking on order number and actual period basis where we can see period basis.
    Also one more question,what is the commitment table which is popping up in this, please advise.
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    Sudesh

  • Report with more than 30 columns

    XML Pub Gurus,
    I have a requirement where I need to create a table layout with proper spacing for more than 30 columns and I asked this question in Open World XML Pub team and they responded to my question as "The page size in word has to be increased to allow to add those many columns". I was satisfied with the answer without knowing that Word will not allow more than 22" long in landscape. So, I am puzzled with the answer in Open World.
    So, could somebody please give me guide lines to create this type of report for more than 30 Columns. This is very common requirement for us to report some of the stuff from the db.
    Thanks in advance
    Ram G

    What do you want your final destination format to be? I'm thinking you'll probably want to go out to HTML or Excel. I would think that would be the only place where you could read and use a report with more than 30 columns.
    Here's an idea if you want to go to excel and if you are using the 10.1.3.2 Enterprise (standalone) version.
    1. Create your query with as many columns as you want.
    2. Don't create a layout at all
    3. Launch Excel Analyzer.
    4. From within Excel, build your report based off the downloaded data (for example add a pivot table).
    5. Upload your excel Analyzer template back to the server
    This template can now be scheduled and delivered like normal templates or updated with current data directly from within Excel.

  • Attachment with more than 255 columns

    Hi together,
    i want to send a mail in background with an attachment with more than 255 columns through the function module SO_DOCUMENT_SEND_API1 . The required content-structure of this function module have 255 columns......
    I try it also with the function module SO_DOCUMENT_REPOSITORY_MANAGER with the method 'SEND'
    but i can't suppress the popup of this function module.
    Have anybody an solution for me ?
    br
    Markus
    Edited by: Markus Garyant on Aug 21, 2008 3:39 PM

    Attachement table has a strucutre SOLISTI1 which can contain only 255 characters BUT you can use the CL_ABAP_CHAR_UTILITIES=>CR_LF for the new line  and CL_ABAP_CHAR_UTILITIES=>HORIZONTAL_TAB for the column separater.
    You need to concatenate this Separters in the attachment table.
    Check out this example:
    http://www.sapdevelopment.co.uk/reporting/email/attach_xls.htm
    Regards,
    Naimesh Patel

  • Row chaining in table with more than 255 columns

    Hi,
    I have a table with 1000 columns.
    I saw the following citation: "Any table with more then 255 columns will have chained
    rows (we break really wide tables up)."
    If I insert a row populated with only the first 3 columns (the others are null), is a row chaining occurred?
    I tried to insert a row described above and no row chaining occurred.
    As I understand, a row chaining occurs in a table with 1000 columns only when the populated data increases
    the block size OR when more than 255 columns are populated. Am I right?
    Thanks
    dyahav

    user10952094 wrote:
    Hi,
    I have a table with 1000 columns.
    I saw the following citation: "Any table with more then 255 columns will have chained
    rows (we break really wide tables up)."
    If I insert a row populated with only the first 3 columns (the others are null), is a row chaining occurred?
    I tried to insert a row described above and no row chaining occurred.
    As I understand, a row chaining occurs in a table with 1000 columns only when the populated data increases
    the block size OR when more than 255 columns are populated. Am I right?
    Thanks
    dyahavYesterday, I stated this on the forum "Tables with more than 255 columns will always have chained rows." My statement needs clarification. It was based on the following:
    http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B28359_01/server.111/b28318/schema.htm#i4383
    "Oracle Database can only store 255 columns in a row piece. Thus, if you insert a row into a table that has 1000 columns, then the database creates 4 row pieces, typically chained over multiple blocks."
    And this paraphrase from "Practical Oracle 8i":
    V$SYSSTAT will show increasing values for CONTINUED ROW FETCH as table rows are read for tables containing more than 255 columns.
    Related information may also be found here:
    http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B10501_01/server.920/a96524/c11schem.htm
    "When a table has more than 255 columns, rows that have data after the 255th column are likely to be chained within the same block. This is called intra-block chaining. A chained row's pieces are chained together using the rowids of the pieces. With intra-block chaining, users receive all the data in the same block. If the row fits in the block, users do not see an effect in I/O performance, because no extra I/O operation is required to retrieve the rest of the row."
    http://download.oracle.com/docs/html/B14340_01/data.htm
    "For a table with several columns, the key question to consider is the (average) row length, not the number of columns. Having more than 255 columns in a table built with a smaller block size typically results in intrablock chaining.
    Oracle stores multiple row pieces in the same block, but the overhead to maintain the column information is minimal as long as all row pieces fit in a single data block. If the rows don't fit in a single data block, you may consider using a larger database block size (or use multiple block sizes in the same database). "
    Why not a test case?
    Create a test table named T4 with 1000 columns.
    With the table created, insert 1,000 rows into the table, populating the first 257 columns each with a random 3 byte string which should result in an average row length of about 771 bytes.
    SPOOL C:\TESTME.TXT
    SELECT
      SN.NAME,
      MS.VALUE
    FROM
      V$MYSTAT MS,
      V$STATNAME SN
    WHERE
      SN.NAME = 'table fetch continued row'
      AND SN.STATISTIC#=MS.STATISTIC#;
    INSERT INTO T4 (
    COL1,
    COL2,
    COL3,
    COL255,
    COL256,
    COL257)
    SELECT
    DBMS_RANDOM.STRING('A',3),
    DBMS_RANDOM.STRING('A',3),
    DBMS_RANDOM.STRING('A',3),
    DBMS_RANDOM.STRING('A',3)
    FROM
      DUAL
    CONNECT BY
      LEVEL<=1000;
    SELECT
      SN.NAME,
      MS.VALUE
    FROM
      V$MYSTAT MS,
      V$STATNAME SN
    WHERE
      SN.NAME = 'table fetch continued row'
      AND SN.STATISTIC#=MS.STATISTIC#;
    SET AUTOTRACE TRACEONLY STATISTICS
    SELECT
    FROM
      T4;
    SET AUTOTRACE OFF
    SELECT
      SN.NAME,
      SN.STATISTIC#,
      MS.VALUE
    FROM
      V$MYSTAT MS,
      V$STATNAME SN
    WHERE
      SN.NAME = 'table fetch continued row'
      AND SN.STATISTIC#=MS.STATISTIC#;
    SPOOL OFFWhat are the results of the above?
    Before the insert:
    NAME                      VALUE                                                
    table fetch continue        166
    After the insert:
    NAME                      VALUE                                                
    table fetch continue        166                                                
    After the select:
    NAME                 STATISTIC#      VALUE                                     
    table fetch continue        252        332  Another test, this time with an average row length of about 12 bytes:
    DELETE FROM T4;
    COMMIT;
    SPOOL C:\TESTME2.TXT
    SELECT
      SN.NAME,
      MS.VALUE
    FROM
      V$MYSTAT MS,
      V$STATNAME SN
    WHERE
      SN.NAME = 'table fetch continued row'
      AND SN.STATISTIC#=MS.STATISTIC#;
    INSERT INTO T4 (
      COL1,
      COL256,
      COL257,
      COL999)
    SELECT
    DBMS_RANDOM.STRING('A',3),
    DBMS_RANDOM.STRING('A',3),
    DBMS_RANDOM.STRING('A',3),
    DBMS_RANDOM.STRING('A',3)
    FROM
      DUAL
    CONNECT BY
      LEVEL<=100000;
    SELECT
      SN.NAME,
      MS.VALUE
    FROM
      V$MYSTAT MS,
      V$STATNAME SN
    WHERE
      SN.NAME = 'table fetch continued row'
      AND SN.STATISTIC#=MS.STATISTIC#;
    SET AUTOTRACE TRACEONLY STATISTICS
    SELECT
    FROM
      T4;
    SET AUTOTRACE OFF
    SELECT
      SN.NAME,
      SN.STATISTIC#,
      MS.VALUE
    FROM
      V$MYSTAT MS,
      V$STATNAME SN
    WHERE
      SN.NAME = 'table fetch continued row'
      AND SN.STATISTIC#=MS.STATISTIC#;
    SPOOL OFFWith 100,000 rows each containing about 12 bytes, what should the 'table fetch continued row' statistic show?
    Before the insert:
    NAME                      VALUE                                                
    table fetch continue        332 
    After the insert:
    NAME                      VALUE                                                
    table fetch continue        332
    After the select:
    NAME                 STATISTIC#      VALUE                                     
    table fetch continue        252      33695The final test only inserts data into the first 4 columns:
    DELETE FROM T4;
    COMMIT;
    SPOOL C:\TESTME3.TXT
    SELECT
      SN.NAME,
      MS.VALUE
    FROM
      V$MYSTAT MS,
      V$STATNAME SN
    WHERE
      SN.NAME = 'table fetch continued row'
      AND SN.STATISTIC#=MS.STATISTIC#;
    INSERT INTO T4 (
      COL1,
      COL2,
      COL3,
      COL4)
    SELECT
    DBMS_RANDOM.STRING('A',3),
    DBMS_RANDOM.STRING('A',3),
    DBMS_RANDOM.STRING('A',3),
    DBMS_RANDOM.STRING('A',3)
    FROM
      DUAL
    CONNECT BY
      LEVEL<=100000;
    SELECT
      SN.NAME,
      MS.VALUE
    FROM
      V$MYSTAT MS,
      V$STATNAME SN
    WHERE
      SN.NAME = 'table fetch continued row'
      AND SN.STATISTIC#=MS.STATISTIC#;
    SET AUTOTRACE TRACEONLY STATISTICS
    SELECT
    FROM
      T4;
    SET AUTOTRACE OFF
    SELECT
      SN.NAME,
      SN.STATISTIC#,
      MS.VALUE
    FROM
      V$MYSTAT MS,
      V$STATNAME SN
    WHERE
      SN.NAME = 'table fetch continued row'
      AND SN.STATISTIC#=MS.STATISTIC#;
    SPOOL OFFWhat should the 'table fetch continued row' show?
    Before the insert:
    NAME                      VALUE                                                
    table fetch continue      33695
    After the insert:
    NAME                      VALUE                                                
    table fetch continue      33695
    After the select:
    NAME                 STATISTIC#      VALUE                                     
    table fetch continue        252      33695 My statement "Tables with more than 255 columns will always have chained rows." needs to be clarified:
    "Tables with more than 255 columns will always have chained rows +(row pieces)+ if a column beyond column 255 is used, but the 'table fetch continued row' statistic +may+ only increase in value if the remaining row pieces are found in a different block."
    Charles Hooper
    IT Manager/Oracle DBA
    K&M Machine-Fabricating, Inc.
    Edited by: Charles Hooper on Aug 5, 2009 9:52 AM
    Paraphrase misspelled the view name "V$SYSSTAT", corrected a couple minor typos, and changed "will" to "may" in the closing paragraph as this appears to be the behavior based on the test case.

  • Spool request with more than 255 columns

    Hi,
    Please let me know what formatting type has to be used to have spool output with more than 255 lines.
    X_24_80_JP        L      ANY           00024   00080   ABAP list HR Japan: At least 24 rows by 80 columns
    X_44_120          L      ANY           00044   00120   ABAP/4 list: At least 44 rows by 120 columns
    X_51_140_JP       L      ANY           00051   00140   ABAP list HR Japan: At least 51 rows by 140 columns
    X_58_170          L      ANY           00058   00170   ABAP/4 list: At least 58 rows by 170 columns
    X_60_80_JP        L      ANY           00060   00080   ABAP list HR Japan: At least 60 rows by 80 columns
    X_65_1024/4       L      ANY           00065   01024   ABAP List: At Least 65 Lines 4*256=1024 Columns Four-Sided (Only for SAPlpd)
    X_65_132          L      ANY           00065   00132   ABAP list: At least 65 rows by 132 columns
    X_65_132-2        L      ANY           00065   00132   ABAP List: 2-column 65 characters 132 columns (only for SAPLPD from 4.15)
    X_65_200          L      ANY           00065   00200   ABAP list: at least 65 lines with 200 columns (not for all device types)
    X_65_255          L      ANY           00065   00255   ABAP/4 list: At least 65 rows with a maximum number of columns
    X_65_256/2        L      ANY           00065   00256   ABAP list: At least 65 lines 2*128=256 double columns (SAPLPD only)
    X_65_512/2        L      ANY           00065   00512   ABAP List:  At least 65 Lines 2*256=512 Columns 2-sided (Only for SAPlpd)
    X_65_80           L      ANY           00065   00080   ABAP/4 list: At least 65 rows by 80 columns
    X_65_80-2         L      ANY           00065   00080   ABAP List: 2-column 65 characters 80 columns (only for SAPLPD from 4.15)
    X_65_80-4         L      ANY           00065   00080   ABAP List: 4-column 65 characters 80 columns (only for SAPLPD from 4.15)
    X_90_120          L      ANY           00090   00120   ABAP list: At least 90 rows by 120 columns
    X_PAPER           L      ANY           00010   00010   ABAP/4 list: Default list formatting
    X_PAPER_NT        L      ANY           00001   00001   ABAP/4 list: Obsolete (do not use)
    X_POSTSCRIPT      L      ANY           00001   00001   Pre-prepared PostScript
    X_SPOOLERR        L      ANY           00001   00001   ABAP list: Spooler problem report
    X_TELEX           L      TELEX         00001   00001   Telex: 69 characters wide, only as many lines as supported by TTU
    ZABC_SAP        L      ANY           00065   00550   LCM Report Page Type
    I have created a custom Format Type with 65*550 (ZABC_SAP) , but still the output gets truncated in the spool.
    In sp01 . For the spool request ... If it displayed in Graphical layoout ... Output is getting truncated but when we see in Raw format .. i can see the entire output. But it is not at all formatted.
    Thanks,
    Tanuj
    Message was edited by:
            Tanuj Kumar Bolisetty

    Hello Tanuj,
    You need to use a page format greater than 255 columns for sure. However still if it does not solve the issue then you may consider using the note 186603.
    PS: I guess you are on a higher release than 4.6 C . For this release this note íIt has a text attachment for a report tat allows to display such spool requests.
    Regards.
    Ruchit.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Can't migrate from Weblogic 8.1 to 10.1. Problems with Web services.

    Hi, I'm beginner in the BEA Weblogic technologies. My current task is a migration of working application (from Weblogic 8.1 to Weblogic 10.1). I've created the new ear-file for WLS 10.1 successfully. But during deploying of new ear-file on server I r

  • What´s happended to my iPhoto?

    By a mistake I moved some files around, ad all the photos in iPhoto disappeared. I managed to find them again by trying something I found on these pages. They came back in a "Recovered photos" folder. Unfortunately I cant edit them, open them in edit

  • 80g Classic: Cover Flow Not In Alphabetical Order

    Actually, most of it is in alphabetical order. But I have an album by "Mandalay" that shows up last (yup, after the "Z" artists) when in cover flow. Also an album by "Ohgr" shows up twice, both with the complete set of songs (1st instance is correct

  • Performance Issues during Upgrade of EBS from 11.5.10.2 to 12.1.1

    Hi, We're upgrading our EBS , from Rel 11.5.10.2 to 12.1.1. We're stuck , while running script ar120bnk.sql (ran more than 20 Hours) : Regarding the tables involved in this Process : select owner , table_name,num_rows,last_analyzed,sample_size from d

  • Cannot Install After Effects CS5 Trial

    I'm not sure what to do, I downloaded the installer fine, but when it comes to installing pops up with something about only working on 64 bit systems, I'm a bit stupid when it comes to things like this, what do I do? Side Note: I've got Windows 7