Printing on Virtual Printserver with bad Performance

Hi all,
I have a virtual Print server running with Server 2012 on a Hyper-V host. I'm facing performance issues when clients try to print on a shared printer. I have another physical print server confirgured exactly the same and using the same drivers for other
printers (but same models). From the same client I can print on the phyisical server and I'm not having any problem while printing on the virtual one causes me a delay. They are in the same Gigabit network.
Services on Physical Server: Print Server, DFS Replication & Nameserver, TrendMicro AV, Windows FW
Services on virtual server: Print Server, Azure AD Sync / DirSync client, Trendmicro AV, Windows FW
The problem: When printing from notepad (but even from other applications) there is a window appearing "now printing" while the print job is being sent to the printer. When printing via the virtual server this window stays 8.5s
and freezes the application. I have measured the time in different scenarios. The test has been done from the same client:
Printing Client-> Virtual Server
All services active: 8.5s
Inactive AV: 8.5s
Inactive FW: 4s
Printing directly on Virtual Server
All services on: 1s
Printing Client -> Phyisical Server
All services on: 1s
File and print services are allowed to pass the FW. I've tried various measurements:
Inactivate IPv6 (registry key)
Inactivate chimney offload
inactivate RSS
inactivate Auto Tuning
Any ideas?
Thanks a lot!
Regards,
Jan

In windows 2012 there is a really good feature for remote sites Branch office printing. You can eanble that so machines prints directly to pritner instead of going through server.
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/jj134156.aspx

Similar Messages

  • Bad performance when deleting report column in webi(with "Design – Structure only")

    Hi all,
    One of our customer has recently upgraded from BO XI to BO4.1. In the new BO 4.1, they encountered a bad performance issue when they were deleting a column in Webi(using "Design – Structure only" mode).
    With “Design – Structure only" mode,  it took webi about 10 seconds to complete after the customer right-clicked a report column and clicked the "delete".  The customer said that they only need to wait for less than 1 second when they did the same in BO XI old version.
    The new BO version used is 4.1SP02, installed in Windows Server 2008 R2. (Server with 32 core CPU, 32G memory)
    This bad performance happened in both Webi web and Rich Client. (in Webi Rich Client, the performance is a little bit better. The 'delete column' action takes about 8 seconds to complete).
    Do anyone know how to tune this performance in webi?  Thank you.
    Besides, it seems that each time we are making change in the webi report structure in IE or Rich Client, webi need to interact with Server site to upload the changes. Is there any option to change this behavior?  Say, do not upload change to Server for when 'deleting report column', only trigger the upload after a set of actions(e.g. trigger when click the "Save" button).
    Thank you.
    Regards,
    Eton.

    Hi all,
    Could anyone help me on this?  Thanks!
    What customer concerns now is that when they did the same 'column editing' action in BO XI R2 for the same report, they did not need to wait.  And they need to wait for at least 7-8 second in the BO 4.1SP02 environment for this action to complete.(data already purged, in structure-only mode)
    One more information about the webi report being editing is: there are many sheets in the report(about 6~10 sheets in one report). Customer don't want to separate these sheet into different reports  as it will increase the effort of their end users to locate similar report sheets.
    Regards,
    Eton.

  • Is it possible to set the performance in Camera Raw, like in PS? I have problems with the performance of the adjustment brush. It is a very bad workflow.

    I have problems with the performance of the adjustment brush. It is a very bad workflow.

    Had you specified you're on Windows, I wouldn't even have replied. I don't do windows.
    Yes, it has been a waste of time for both you and me.
    You don't even know how to ask a question properly and you want me to read the FAQs?  Hah! 
    No one will take your word for "ACR latest version", and "PS CC latest VersionVersion [sic]", as many users believe they are fully updated when they are not. Exact version numbers are needed.
    8 GB is considered the realistic minimum to run Photoshop CC, but it's far from optimal—on any platform.  There are other factors that can be at play and which you don't specify, such as the space available on each of your hard drives, whether you have a physically separate, dedicated hard drive for Photoshop's scratch drive, what video card you have and how much VRAM does it have, what your graphics settings are in Photoshop's Preferences > Performance, etc.
    That's why I had indicated a link for you to read:
    Please read this FAQ for advice on how to ask your questions correctly for quicker and better answers: 
    http://forums.adobe.com/thread/419981?tstart=0
    If you read that link in its entirety and provide the pertinent information, maybe some of the Windows experts will be able to help you out.
    Now I'm out of here.

  • Virtual infocube with services - division of suppliers in categories

    Hello,
    I’ve a problem and the idea to solve it with a virtual infocube with services. But unfortunately I don’t know if it’s really possible to solve it like this.
    The scenario is:
    I’ve suppliers, turnovers, goods (which have been delivered) and different quality deficiencies.  In dependence of the turnover with each supplier, they will be ranked. For the position in the ranking they get points. From this start points one have to subtract points for the different quality deficiencies. In dependence of this end-sum, the suppliers will be divided into categories. And this division should be shown in the query.
    But the suppliers can vary in each run of the query in dependence of the selection in the query. And the turnover of each supplier which depends on the selected goods can vary, too. So the division into the different categories depends on the selection and is dynamic. One doesn’t know this before. And so it isn’t possible to save the category of each supplier in an infoprovider.
    Now I want to know, if it’s possible to solve this with a virtual infocube with services.
    I hope there’s somebody who can help me. Thank you.
    Susanne

    Hello Susanne,
    first of all, yes, it can be solved with VirtualProviders. But I wouldn't expect it to have a good performance. It depends on the number of data records we are talking about.
    When you create a VirtualProvider you should make sure that the RFC Packing switch is flagged on. You can then get the selections in the tables-parameter selection with the structure bapi6200sl. Now you need to read the raw data for your selection. Either use the function module RSDRI_INFOPROV_READ or write the data into an ODS to simplify the selection.
    Based on the raw data you need to do you calculation and write the data back to the table data.
    For details of the implementation of the VirtualProvider and the function module you can check the SDN. These topics are also covered in my book ABAP Development in SAP BW - User Exits and BAdIs that was lately translated into English. You can find both the German and English version under <a href="http://www.sap-hefte.de/katalog/hefte/titel/gp/titelID-1256">www.sap-hefte.de</a> or <a href="http://www.sappress.com/product.cfm?account=&product=H1948">www.sappress.com</a>
    Best regards

  • Bad performance video in on vivo card?

    This opinion posted as a reply in other thread. But because I think It is proper to be an issue for discussion
    I am posting in a new thread. Let alone the difficulty in configuration, the vivo of this card seems to have a poor performance.
    I too have a GeForce 4 Ti4200-VTD8X-8894 AGP 8X 128MB.
    Vidio in working in a machine, but not in other machine.
    I also have a ati tv wonder pci, The configurations of the capture driver on both machine appeares to be the same but behave differently, which I don't know why at all.
    What I've found so far :
    1. For tv(videoin) decoding: dscaler1.7(alpha) works on both machine(but on bad one freezes often)
    2. On the bad machine using any capture driver causes pending (ie. in windows movie maker or virtual dub), drivers(1.27 or 1.22) have the same behavior.
    3. While comparing the performance of tv decoding, I found a big issue. Tvwonder was very vivid on screen and the cpu usage was only 8% while vivo was very rough(skipping, ...) and the cpu load was over 60%.
    So the conclusion?
    The tv in of this card is only for the poor. If you can bear the poor performanc, you can spend lots of time to enable it and get bad performance. I'd rather buy a h/w decoding tv card for $30 or more. With amd xp 2.1G, and Tvwonder and window media encoder, I was able to broadcast to 1.5g bandwidth of video quality while watching the movie on Window media player on the same machine. The cpu usage was around 80%. But with this card, I cannot dream of it at all.
    It is said that this card has bt848 decoder(So can be played using dscaler1.7). Then how come this card be so slow on decoding? Bad configuration? Possibly. If anyone who could watch tv(through vcr) fast enough with low cpu usage, please let me know the secret.

    I started again from scratch (3:th time), installed win98 on a clean HD and installed the vga driver from the cd in the box. Then I installed Winproducer from the cd, but the capture program I have to browse on the cd to install. The capture seems to work now, but I can not save my recording from my camcorder, some error message is poping up and the same message is when I tried to play the saved file (there is a saved file anyway).
    I have problem whith my network card also byt only in win98, complaining about ndis.vxd (can´t load ndis.vxd).
    So I have to install W2000 to get internet.
    When I installed the Winproducer on W2000 the computer rebooted all the time, is Winproducer not compatible whith W2000 ??
    I have not downloded anything yet (se abow).
    And where can I find this 28.32 or 29.42 ?
    WDM, I have installed this time.
    Thanks NE

  • CMP 6.1 Entity bad performance.

    I'am using entity 1.1 EJB on WL 6.1 and facing very bad performances:
    around 150ms for an insert (i have 20 columns).
    When accessing an order interface to read 2 fields in a session bean method: around
    90 ms.
    I'am very disapointed and confused. What should I look up for
    to increase the performance ? Any important tuning or parameters ? Should I use EJB
    2.0 to have significant perf ?
    Thanks for any advice because we are thinking to switch all the application on stored
    procedures. A solution without Entity and fewer stateless session beans.
    My config:
    WL: 6.1 on Sun sparc
    SGBD: Sybase
    Entity: WebLogic 6.0.0 EJB 1.1 RDBMS (weblogic-rdbms11-persistence-600.dtd)
    Thanks

    Historically its hard to get good performance & scalability out of sybase
    without using stored procs. Using dynamic sql on sybase just doesnt do as
    well as procs. Oracle on the other hand can get very close to stored proc
    speed out of well written dynamic sql.
    As far as weblogic goes, my experience is the focus of their testing for db
    related stuff is Oracle, then DB2, then MSSQLServer. Sybase is usually last
    on the list.
    As far as the 6.1 cmp, haven't used it much, but because of these other
    things I would be cautious about using it with Sybase.
    Joel
    "Antoine Bas" <[email protected],> wrote in message
    news:3cc7cdcf$[email protected]..
    >
    I'am using entity 1.1 EJB on WL 6.1 and facing very bad performances:
    around 150ms for an insert (i have 20 columns).
    When accessing an order interface to read 2 fields in a session beanmethod: around
    90 ms.
    I'am very disapointed and confused. What should I look up for
    to increase the performance ? Any important tuning or parameters ? ShouldI use EJB
    2.0 to have significant perf ?
    Thanks for any advice because we are thinking to switch all theapplication on stored
    procedures. A solution without Entity and fewer stateless session beans.
    My config:
    WL: 6.1 on Sun sparc
    SGBD: Sybase
    Entity: WebLogic 6.0.0 EJB 1.1 RDBMS(weblogic-rdbms11-persistence-600.dtd)
    >
    Thanks

  • Bad performance when open a bi publisher report in excel

    We use bi publisher(xml publisher) to create a customized report. For a small report, user like it very much. But for a bigger report, users complain about the performance when they open the file.
    I know it is not a native excel file, that may cause the bad performance. So I ask my user to save it to a new file as a native excel format. The new file still worse than a normal excel file when we open it.
    I did a test. We try to save a bi publish report to excel format, the size shrink to 4Mb. But if we "copy all" and "Paste Special" value only to a new excel file, the size is only 1Mb.
    Do I have any way to improve that, users are complaining everyday. Thanks!
    I did a test today.
    I create a test report
    Test 1: Original file from BIP in EBS is 10Mb. We save it in my local disk, when we open the file, it takes 43 sec.
    Test 2: We save the file in native excel format, the file size is 2.28Mb, it takes 7 sec. to open.
    Test 3: We copy all cell and "PasteSpecial" to a new excel file with value only. The file size is 1.66Mb, it takes only 1 sec to open.
    Edited by: Rex Lin on 2010/3/31 下午 11:26

    EBS or Standalone BIP?
    If EBS see this thread for suggestions on performance tuning and hints and tips:
    EBS BIP Performance Tuning - Definitive Guide?
    Note also that I did end up rewriting my report as PL/SQL producing a csv file and have done with several large reports in BIP on EBS.
    Cheers,
    Dave

  • How to acquire serial data on a digital input line with good performance?

    Hello,
    we have a performance problem with our realtime controller. Our objective is, to read a 24-bit long digital waveform from a digital input line. To do this, we supply a clock signal (236 KHz)  to the PFI1 Line of our DAQ Board. On each rising edge of the clock, a new bit is set on the digital input DI0.
    Our hardware which transmits the data, is triggered through a digital output from our realtime controller. On each edge on this output, the hardware starts a serial transmission of 24-Bits.
    Everything works fine except the bad performance of our realtime controller. We want to acquire the 24-Bits in a 1ms timed loop. To measure performance we wrote a test program. In that, we only triggered the hardware and transfered the data to the realtime controller. The task which is doing this job, has a approx. CPU-Load of 30%, which is, in my humble opinion, very high. The task is not waiting for data or anything else! We have earlier implemented a control which is also using a 1ms timed loop. This control is sampling 2 analog input signals, 2 counters. Futhermore it's sending telegrams with CAN and doing many calculations. The strange thing is, this much huger program has a CPU-Load of 25%. Does anybody know where the problem is?
    For the better understandig I attached our test-program to this text.
    We're using:
    PXI-8175 realtime controler
    PXI-6221 Multifunction DAQ
    Thanks!
    Regards, 
       Crest!
    Attachments:
    dig_test.zip ‏51 KB

    Hello,
    First of all 30% CPU-Load is normal because the DAQmx-driver needs a lot of resources.
    In your programm you should place a wait (for example with 1ms) into the while-loop which causes
    lower CPU-Load.
    If this is not enough you should build your vi like in the following example.
    Regards,
    Christian
    Attachments:
    Read Dig Port.vi ‏51 KB

  • HP 8600 all in one Printer Scanner to Computer with Windows 8

    i can not get the printer to reconize the Computor i want to scan to  i Have HP Printer 8600 all in one printer and HP computor with Windows 8 (wireless)

    Hello Stringfield, and welcome to the HP Forums, I hope you enjoy your experience!
    I see you are experiencing scan issues.  I would like to help.
    I would suggest performing a power reset on the printer.  Disconnect the power cord from the printer and the power outlet, then wait 60 seconds. After 60 seconds, plug the printer back in. Ensure you plug the printer directly to a wall outlet. Make sure to bypass any sort of surge protector or power bar.
    I would then recommend downloading and running the HP Print and Scan Doctor.
    Please let me know the results.  Thanks for posting on the HP Forums!
    Please click “Accept as Solution " if you feel my post solved your issue, it will help others find the solution.
    Click the “Kudos, Thumbs Up" on the right to say “Thanks" for helping!
    Jamieson
    I work on behalf of HP
    "Remember, I'm pulling for you, we're all in this together!" - Red Green.

  • Since loading Lion, I've experienced much more instability than Snow Leopard. In particular, Mail crashes with regularity, full-screen apps seem to run slower and show the beach ball more often for longer, etc.  I'm disappointed with the performance. Any

    Since loading Lion, I've experienced much more instability than Snow Leopard. In particular, Mail crashes with regularity, full-screen apps seem to run slower and show the beach ball more often for longer, etc. I love the features, but I'm disappointed with the performance. Any help coming from Apple?  I've been sending them so many reports after crashes, that their file must be full!

    Summoning max. courage, I did what you advised. Here is the result. What does this tell you? My Lion 7.2 (mid 2011 iMac) has several annoying glitches (which I have so far tolerated through gritted teeth) but none that have actually stopped me working.
    BTW, I see several items involving CleanMyMac which I did not know I had. It is generally villified as a trouble-maker. Spotlight can't find an app. or a utility of that name. How can I get rid of what's there please? Just delete?
    Last login: Thu Nov  3 20:55:11 on console
    Steve-Kirkbys-iMac:~ stevekirkby$ kextstat -kl | awk ' !/apple/ { print $6 $7 } '
    com.AmbrosiaSW.AudioSupport(4.0)
    Steve-Kirkbys-iMac:~ stevekirkby$ sudo launchctl list | sed 1d | awk ' !/0x|apple|com\.vix|edu\.|org\./ { print $3 } '
    Password:
    com.openssh.sshd
    com.stclairsoft.DefaultFolderXAgent
    com.microsoft.office.licensing.helper
    com.bombich.ccc.scheduledtask.067493DB-2728-4DF3-87D8-092EF69086E8
    com.bombich.ccc
    com.adobe.SwitchBoard
    Steve-Kirkbys-iMac:~ stevekirkby$ launchctl list | sed 1d | awk ' !/0x|apple|edu\.|org\./ { print $3 } '
    com.sony.PMBPortable.AutoRun
    uk.co.markallan.clamxav.freshclam
    com.veoh.webplayer.startup
    com.macpaw.CleanMyMac.volumeWatcher
    com.macpaw.CleanMyMac.trashSizeWatcher
    com.adobe.ARM.202f4087f2bbde52e3ac2df389f53a4f123223c9cc56a8fd83a6f7ae
    com.adobe.AAM.Scheduler-1.0
    Steve-Kirkbys-iMac:~ stevekirkby$ ls -1A {,/}Library/{Ad,Compon,Ex,Fram,In,La,Mail/Bu,P*P,Priv,Qu,Scripti,Sta}* 2> /dev/null
    /Library/Components:
    /Library/Extensions:
    /Library/Frameworks:
    AEProfiling.framework
    AERegistration.framework
    ApplicationEnhancer.framework
    AudioMixEngine.framework
    FxPlug.framework
    NyxAudioAnalysis.framework
    PluginManager.framework
    ProFX.framework
    ProMetadataSupport.framework
    TSLicense.framework
    iLifeFaceRecognition.framework
    iLifeKit.framework
    iLifePageLayout.framework
    iLifeSQLAccess.framework
    iLifeSlideshow.framework
    /Library/Input Methods:
    /Library/Internet Plug-Ins:
    AdobePDFViewer.plugin
    EPPEX Plugin.plugin
    Flash Player.plugin
    Flip4Mac WMV Plugin.plugin
    JavaAppletPlugin.plugin
    Quartz Composer.webplugin
    QuickTime Plugin.plugin
    SharePointBrowserPlugin.plugin
    SharePointWebKitPlugin.webplugin
    Silverlight.plugin
    flashplayer.xpt
    iPhotoPhotocast.plugin
    nsIQTScriptablePlugin.xpt
    /Library/LaunchAgents:
    com.adobe.AAM.Updater-1.0.plist
    com.sony.PMBPortable.AutoRun.plist
    /Library/LaunchDaemons:
    com.adobe.SwitchBoard.plist
    com.apple.remotepairtool.plist
    com.bombich.ccc.plist
    com.bombich.ccc.scheduledtask.067493DB-2728-4DF3-87D8-092EF69086E8.plist
    com.microsoft.office.licensing.helper.plist
    com.stclairsoft.DefaultFolderXAgent.plist
    /Library/PreferencePanes:
    .DS_Store
    Application Enhancer.prefPane
    Default Folder X.prefPane
    DejaVu.prefPane
    Flash Player.prefPane
    Flip4Mac WMV.prefPane
    /Library/PrivilegedHelperTools:
    com.bombich.ccc
    com.microsoft.office.licensing.helper
    com.stclairsoft.DefaultFolderXAgent
    /Library/QuickLook:
    iWork.qlgenerator
    /Library/QuickTime:
    AppleIntermediateCodec.component
    AppleMPEG2Codec.component
    DesktopVideoOut.component
    DivX 6 Decoder.component
    FCP Uncompressed 422.component
    Flip4Mac WMV Advanced.component
    Flip4Mac WMV Export.component
    Flip4Mac WMV Import.component
    LiveType.component
    /Library/ScriptingAdditions:
    .DS_Store
    Adobe Unit Types.osax
    Default Folder X Addition.osax
    /Library/StartupItems:
    Library/Address Book Plug-Ins:
    Library/Frameworks:
    EWSMac.framework
    Library/Input Methods:
    .localized
    Library/Internet Plug-Ins:
    Library/LaunchAgents:
    com.adobe.AAM.Updater-1.0.plist
    com.adobe.ARM.202f4087f2bbde52e3ac2df389f53a4f123223c9cc56a8fd83a6f7ae.plist
    com.macpaw.CleanMyMac.trashSizeWatcher.plist
    com.macpaw.CleanMyMac.volumeWatcher.plist
    com.veoh.webplayer.startup.plist
    uk.co.markallan.clamxav.freshclam.plist
    Library/PreferencePanes:
    .DS_Store
    Perian.prefPane
    WindowShade X.prefPane
    Library/QuickTime:
    AC3MovieImport.component
    Perian.component
    Library/ScriptingAdditions:
    Steve-Kirkbys-iMac:~ stevekirkby$

  • Bad performance updating purchase order (ME22N)

    Hello!
    Recently, we face bad performance updating purchase orders using transaction ME22N. The problem occurs since we implemented change documents for a custom table T. T is used to store additional data to purchase order positions using BAdIs ME_PROCESS_PO_CUST and ME_GUI_PO_CUST.
    I've created a change document C_T for T using transaction SCDO. The update module of the change document is triggered in the method POST of BAdI ME_PROCESS_PO_CUST.
    Checking transaction SM13, I recognized that the update requests of ME22n have status INIT for several minutes before they are processed. I also tried to exclude the call of the update module for change document C_T (in Method POST) - the performance problem still occurs!
    The problem only occurs with transaction ME22N, thus I assume that the reason is the new change document C_T.
    Thanks for your help!
    Greetings,
    Wolfgang

    I agree with vikram, we don't have enough information, even not a small hint on usage of this field, so which answer do you expect (The quality of an answer depends ...) This analysis must be executed on your system...
    From a technical point of view, the BAPI_PO_CHANGE has EXTENSIONIN table parameter, fill it using structure BAPI_TE_MEPOITEM[X] alreading containing CI_EKPODB (*) and CI_EKPODBX (**)
    Regards,
    Raymond
    (*) I guess you have used this include
    (**) I guess you forgot this one (same field names but data element always BAPIUPDATE)

  • Reporting on master data customer and bad performances : any workaround ?

    Hello,
    I've been asked to investiguate on bad performances encountered when performing reporting
    on the specific master data zcustomer.
    Basically this master data has a quite similar design that 0customer, there are 96000 entries in the master data table.
    A simple query has been developed : the reporting is done on the master data zcustomer and its attributes : no key figure, no calculation, no restriction ...
    Nevertheless, the query can not be executed .. the query runs around 10 minute in rsrt, then the private memory is exhausted and then a short dump is generated.
    I tried to buid a very simple query on 0customer, this time, without the attributes ... and it took more than 30 sec before I get the results.
    I checked the queries statistics :
    3.x Analyzer Server 10 sec
    OLAP: Read Texts : 20 sec
    How is it that it is so long to performthe reporitng on those master data, while in the same time If i try to display the content in SAP by choosing "maintain master data", I have an immediate answer.
    I there any workaround ?
    Any help would be really appreciated.
    thank you.
    Raoul

    Hi.
    How much data have you got in the cube?
    If you make no restrictions, you are asking the system to return data for all 96.000 customers. That is one thing that might take some time.
    Also, using the attributes of this customer object, fx making selection or displaying several of them, means that the system has to run through the 96.000 records in masterdata to know what goes where in the report.
    When you display the masterdata, you are by default displaying just the 250 or so first hits, and you are not joining against any cube or sorting the result set, so that is fast.
    You should make some kind of restriction on other things than zcustomer (time, org.unit, version, etc, to limit the dataset from the cube, but also a restriction on one of the zcustomer attribs, with an index for that maybe, and performance should improve.
    br
    Jacob

  • Bad Performance in a query into table BKPF

    Hi forum i have a really problem in the second query under the table
    BKPF.. some body cans help me, please
    *THIS IS THE QUERY UNDER MSEG
      SELECT tmsegmblnr tmkpfbudat tmsegbelnr tmsegbukrs tmseg~matnr
             tmsegebelp tmsegdmbtr tmsegwaers tmsegwerks tmseg~lgort
             tmsegmenge tmsegkostl
      FROM mseg AS tmseg JOIN mkpf AS tmkpf ON tmsegmblnr = tmkpfmblnr
      INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE it_docs
      WHERE
        tmseg~bukrs IN se_bukrs AND
        tmkpf~budat IN se_budat AND
        tmseg~mjahr = d_gjahr AND
        ( tmsegbwart IN se_bwart AND tmsegbwart IN (201,261) ).
      IF sy-dbcnt > 0.
    I CREATE AWKEY FOR CONSULTING BKPF
        LOOP AT it_docs.
          CONCATENATE it_docs-mblnr d_gjahr INTO it_docs-d_awkey.
          MODIFY it_docs.
        ENDLOOP.
    THIS IS THE QUERY WITH BAD BAD PERFOMANCE
    I NEED KNOW "BELNR" FOR GO TO THE BSEG TABLE
        SELECT belnr awkey
        FROM bkpf
        INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE it_tmp
        FOR ALL ENTRIES IN it_docs
        WHERE
          bukrs = it_docs-bukrs AND
          awkey = it_docs-d_awkey AND
          gjahr = d_gjahr AND
          bstat = space .
    THNKS

    Hi Josue,
    The bad performance is because you're not specifying the primary keys of the table BKPF in your WHERE condition; BKPF usually is a big table.
    What you really need is to create a new index on database for table BKPF via the ABAP Dictionary on fields BUKRS, AWKEY, GJAHR & BSTAT. You'll find the performace of the program will significantly increase after the new index is activated. But I would talk to the Basis first to confirm they have no issues if you create a new index for BKPF on the database system.
    Hope this helps.
    Cheers,
    Sougata.

  • Bad performance in web intelligence reports

    Hi,
    We use Business Objects with Web Intelligence documents and Crystal Reports.
    We are supporting bad performance when we use the reports specilly when we need to change the drill options
    Can someone telling me if exists some best practices to improve performance? What features should i look to?
                      Best Regards
                            João Fernandes

    Hi,
    Thank you for your interest. I know that this a issue with many variables because that i need information about anything that could cause bad performance.
    For bad performance i mean the time that we take running and refreshing reports data.
    We have reports with many lines but the performance is bad even when a few users are in the system
                                 Best Regards
                                         João Fernandes

  • Help: Bad performance in marketing documents!

    Hello,
    When creating an AR delivery note which has about 10 lines, we have really noticed that the creation of lines becomes slower and slower. This especially happens when making tab in the system field "Quantity". In fact, before going to the next field quickly, it stays in Quantity field for about 5 seconds!
    The number of formatted searches in AR delivery note is only 5. And only one is automatic. The number of user fields is about 5.
    We have heard about the bad performance when the number of lines increases in the documents when having formatted searches, but it is odd to happen this with about 10 lines in the document.
    We are using PL16 and this issue seems to have been solved already at PL10.
    Could you throw some light on this?
    Thanks in advance,

    It is solved now.
    It had to be with the automatic formated search in 2 head fields.
    If the automatic search is removed, the performance is OK.
    Hope it helps you,

Maybe you are looking for