Problem creating backend PO in ECC

Hi,
I have already posted this question in the SRM Forum.
We are using SRM 5.0. I am trying to create a backend PO. SRM defines the standard PO with a doc type as 'EC' and the same in ECC is defined as 'ZSTD'. This is getting created perfectly. Absolutely no problem
I am trying to create other POs from SRM to ECC:
"Blanket PO - Doctype ZBPO"
"Exemption PO - Doctype ZEPO" etc
I am able to select different types of POs from the drop down from the SRM screen. But when I am debugging, I always get the doc type as 'EC' regardless of what ever type of PO I select from SRM screen.
Why am I getting same DOCTYPE for different POs from SRM?
I am implementing the BADI "BBP_CREATE_BE_PO_NEW"
Thanks,
Rajasekhar

Hi Santosh,
I was out of office. I did try to do what ever u said. I am getting the number range related to the doc type which I wanted to create.
With respect to changing the DOC_TYPE of BADI BBP_DOC_CHANGE_BADI, method BBP_SC_CHANGE, I always have DOC_TYPE as 'EC' regardless of type of PO I am selecting on the SRM Screen.
Do you have any clue, if we need to make any config changes?
Thanks
Rajasekhar

Similar Messages

Problem Creating Backend PO

Hi,
We are using SRM 5.0. I am trying to create a backend PO. SRM defines the standard PO with a doc type as 'EC' and the same in ECC is defined as 'ZSTD'. This is getting created perfectly. Absolutely no problem
I am trying to create other POs from SRM to ECC:
"Blanket PO - Doctype ZBPO"
"Exemption PO - Doctype ZEPO" etc
I am able to select different types of POs from the drop down from the SRM screen. But when I am debugging, I always get the doc type as 'EC' regardless of what ever type of PO I select from SRM screen.
Why am I getting same DOCTYPE for different POs from SRM?
Thanks,
Rajasekhar

Hi,
Please check the attribute BSA(Document Type in Backend) in the Org Structure ....I think they are defined as 'EC' in your case resulting backend document type to EC .....for all the SRM SCs
Please check it...
Regards
Sudheer Mullamuri

Problem during hierarchy load from ECC 6.0 to BW

Hello,
I encountered a problem during hierarchy loads from ECC to BW:
I get the following in BW:
Error when updating Idocs in Source System
Diagnosis
Errors have been reported in Source System during IDoc update:
Once I go into ERP and look at the IDocs I get the following message:
Idoc Error 26:
EDI: Syntax error in IDoc (segment cannot be identified)
Message no. E0078
Diagnosis
The segment E1RSSH does not occur at the current level of the basic type (extension ).
This error can have several reasons:
The segment E1RSSH is assigned to a group whose header segment does not occur.
The segment E1RSSH does not exist in the syntax description of the basic type (extension ).
The sequence of segments in the group in which the segment appears is incorrect.
Previous errors ('mandatory' segment or group missing) may be due to this error.
Procedure
Please check the IDoc or the syntax description of the basic type (extension ).
Can anyone help?

The most basic setting in a BW system is its connectivity with the R/3 system (which is a basis team activity, but BI consultant can always help).
Issue: While creating source system, I am getting an error "Segment E1RSSH does not exist".
Diagnosis
Segment E1RSSH is in the syntax description, but it does not exist.
The issue was that some of the entries in the table EDISEGMENT were missing.
As this a standard table, it is recommended to restore the table from Backup or from another BI system. (Please ask your basis team to do it.)
Now, the significance of the segments: We all know that we require 3 message types in total to communicate with R/3 system. RSRQST, RSSEND and RSINFO.
Now each of the message types has some segments which help in communication.
You can see this segment types in the t-code we30. Just enter the basic idoc type and click on display.
This error is not a common error, but can be useful if at any stage of implementation or support, the table gets disturbed and you have issues with source system connectivity.
Thanks
SM

Need to create ABAP proxy in ECC 6.0

Hi All,
I need to create Abap proxy in ECC 6.0 .Tha actual senerio is iam getting data from XI in XML format and i need to validate and update the date in the ZEE table fields respectively.i need to Modularize the class and keep the validation part separate. we should do validation framework for custom Master Data objects which can be turned On and Off. This can be used as a common framework for all master data validations.can any one guide me how to create abap proxy from staring till end ...Thanks in advance ...
Regards,
SRIram

Hi,
I got these below steps from SDNforumonly ..i do not have the link however i have the steps:
1.check Delivered Languages service.sap.com/languages.
2.check note 42305
3.In transaction SMLT , Choose Classify Language (Language symbol or F5 )
4.Supplement this language with English or German (Recommended)
5.The language must be defined in the instance profiles so that you can log on in these languages. The relevant parameter is
zcsa/installed_languages.
6.Go to the language for which you want to install extra packages and choose or choose Language --> Import Package
7.in the next screen , enter the path for language packages.
8.start immediately or schedule it .Optionally you can use the target server to exceute this ( to avoid performance issues
,if you are importing in production timings, and you cna exculde this server from logon group )
9.if any problems in importing then analyze the log and restart the import .
10.After importing the languages, you must also import the language data in the Support Packages.Choose Language --->
Special Actions ---> Import Support Packages
11.Go to the language that you want to supplement and choose or Language ---> Supplement Language(this is client specific ,
so execute for each client in your system)
And also to the above if your system is running on non unicode you need to install the code pages (example AIX locale command) .
Thanks.

Can we creat the inforecord in ECC as the follow on document of the RFX

Hi ,experts :
As we know , we can create the contract as the follow on document of the RFX in SRM .But ,in my case ,the client do not want to use the contract .The use the inforecord in ECC .
So ,I want to know how to create the inforecord as the follow on document of RFx ?
Any suggestions ,welcome .
Bestregards !
Alex !

Hi,Masa:
Thanks for your reply .
I checked the function modle .In this FM , the system has one Remote Fuction Call ---'BBPV_CONTRACT_CREATE'(this function is on the backend system ).So ,I should change this FM use the new one ,right ?
I am sorry ,do you know the funtion name that can create the inforecord in Ecc?
many thanks !
Bestregards !
Alex !

Shopping cart with Asset can not create backend PO in SOSC

Dear Expert,
We are using With SRM 7.0 & ECC 6.0 EHP4 , the shopping cart with account assignment cost center can create backend PO in SOSC, but the shopping cart with account assignment Asset can not create backend PO in SOSC.
The xml message is correct in SRM, but not correct in ECC.
Your help is very appreciated....
Best Regards,
bill

Dear Poster,
As no response has been provided to the thread in some time I must assume the issue is resolved, if the question is still valid please create a new thread rephrasing the query and providing as much data as possible to promote response from the community.
Best Regards,
SDN SRM Moderation Team

Creating backend contract

Hi all,
I'm using SRM 4.0 with R/3 backend 4.7. To create the follow-on documents i've activated Extended Classic Scenario (SRM Server - Cross-Application Basic Settings - Activate Extended Classic Scenario). In Org. plan in the tab Function for the pur. organization and pur. group I checked the corresponding indicators but left the Backend Purchasing Group and Purchasing Organization empty. This was done because if I fill the backend pur. group and pur. organization I can't create shopping cart.
After creating the shopping cart I'm creating the Purchase Contract and trying to transfer it to backend. In backend in transaction BD87 there is the following error: Enter PurOrg. Does anybody know what's the problem?
Best regards,
Vlad

Hi Vlad
Keep the current P.org & P.grp in PPOMA_BBP as they are.
In PPOMA_BBP, you can create an additional node for backend P.org (in function assign to backend P.org) and then create backend P.grp under this node.
Would suggest you to use backend p.org and P.grp in contract.
Best regards
Ramki

Problem Creating Hyperlink to another workbook

I am having a problem creating a hyperlink to a worksheet in another workbook.
Here is what I have done:
Created the master and detail reports in 2 different workbooks.
Executed the master worksheet to display the data
Right clicked the field in the first row where I want to create the hyperlink, and chose Manage Links
Clicked the New Link button
Chose Worksheet for Where do you want to link to?
Clicked Browse by the Destination Worksheet
Clicked the detail report from the list of workbooks but the select button is grayed out
Does anyone have any idea why it won't let me select the detail report to link to?
I have OracleBI Discoverer Plus 10g
Any suggestions would be deeply appreciated.

Yes, I did add a parameter to the detail report so that I could get detail just for that one item. The part that is giving me trouble is specifying the Destination workbook/worksheet. I see the detail report when I browse but the Select button is grayed out so I haven't made it to the part where you identify what values to pass to the detail report yet.

I'm exhausted of trying to find a solution to a problem created by Apple. I have moved to iCloud, following your instructions and now I can not use my mobileme e-mail address. How can I contact directly with Apple, not just an automatic reply phone number

I'm exhausted of trying to find a solution to a problem created by Apple. I have moved to icloud following all your instructions and now I can not use my mobile me e-mail address. I can not activate icloud because when I put my e-mail address it answers that somebody is already using my address. I have my old e-mails, but I can not receive any e-mail or send them.
I have contacted Apple Technical Support in Spain and I was sent an e-mail saying that I have to call a phone number and when I call it is always an answering machine who answers that says that I have to pay 50€ for a consultation or wait for 10 minutes. When I have made the consultation it was never mentioned that I have to pay 50€ for a phone consultation. If I don't want to wait I have to pay for the Apple Tecnical Support which cost 250 €, this was not mentioned in the technical support page.
Can somebody let me know how can I contact Apple in another way in order to talk with a human being or chat directly? I was very happy just using my mobileme e-mails, I didn't need any clouds and I was force by Apple to registered if I want to continue using my mobileme e-mail address.

Sandra,
See this Apple support document for information on reporting an issue with your iTunes purchase.
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1933
B-rock

I would like to create a playlist of some of my voicememos to hear on my iphone5. I have no problem creating the list and can listen on playlist on computer but not when i sync to my phone. How can I listen to voicememos in a playlist on my iPhone?

I would like to create a playlist of some of my voicememos to hear on my iphone5. I have no problem creating the list and can listen on playlist on computer but not when i sync to my phone. How can I listen to voicememos in a playlist on my iPhone?

Hi czigrand,
Thanks for visiting Apple Support Communities.
Currently, you can gift dollar amounts or individual items (EG. songs) on the iTunes Store. See this article for more information:
In the iTunes Store, you can gift a dollar amount or specific music, movies, TV shows, or apps from your iPhone, iPod touch, iPad, Mac, or PC. Follow these steps to send a gift from the iTunes Store.
iTunes: Sending iTunes Gifts
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT2736
Best Regards,
Jeremy

How to create a package in ECC 6.0.

Hi,
Can you tell me how to create a package in ECC 6.0 system?
Thanks in advance,
Regards,
Arnab.

Hi,
Thank you for your replies.
Can you tell me the difference and uses of the two types of package I can create from SE21.
i.e. : Package and package interface. any sap link would also be helpful. I need to know where i can use what and what would be helpful for my case.
Regards,
Arnab.

Problem creating Allocation Table with Reference to a PO

Dear Folks,
I am having problems creating an allocation table with reference to a PO in T-code WA01.
I read the SAP help that some prerequisites need to exist:
==> You can only reference order items flagged as being relevant to a stock split (the Allocation table relevant indicator in the additional item data).
Can anyone advice me where to find this stock split indicator?
Also, can anyone advice me how to reuse an allocation table? For example, I had previously created an allocation table with many articles and various allocation rules. I already generated follow on documents for this table.
Say after 2 weeks, I have the similar requirements that I can make use of the same table, only with minor adjustments to the quantity. How do I create a new allocation table using the existing allocation table data?
Thanks and Regards
Junwen

Any idea please?
thanks

Problem creating Network ACL for a ROLE in Oracle 11gR2

According to Oracle Documentation when you create a new Network ACL you can add privileges to a user or role. I need to create a new ACL for the UTL_SMTP package for a specific role, but when I granted it the users who have that role are still getting the "ORA-24247: network access denied by access control list (ACL)" error when they try to send an email. If I grant the ACL privilege to the same users directly it works fine. Is there any step I'm missing? This is the test I have made on my Solaris 10 - Oracle 11gR2 (11.2.0.3) Standard Edition server:
SQL*Plus: Release 11.2.0.1.0 Production on Wed Aug 21 09:31:52 2013
Copyright (c) 1982, 2010, Oracle. All rights reserved.
SQL> CONNECT system/******@testdb
Connected.
SQL> SET LINES 1000
SQL> SELECT * FROM v$version;
BANNER
Oracle Database 11g Release 11.2.0.3.0 - 64bit Production
PL/SQL Release 11.2.0.3.0 - Production
CORE    11.2.0.3.0      Production
TNS for Solaris: Version 11.2.0.3.0 - Production
NLSRTL Version 11.2.0.3.0 - Production
SQL> COLUMN host FORMAT A20
SQL> COLUMN lower_port FORMAT 99999
SQL> COLUMN upper_port FORMAT 99999
SQL> COLUMN acl FORMAT A40
SQL> COLUMN acl FORMAT A40
SQL> COLUMN principal FORMAT A15
SQL> COLUMN privilege FORMAT A10
SQL> COLUMN is_grant FORMAT A8
SQL> COLUMN status FORMAT A10
SQL> SELECT host, lower_port, upper_port, acl FROM dba_network_acls;
no rows selected
SQL> SELECT acl,principal,privilege,is_grant FROM dba_network_acl_privileges;
no rows selected
SQL> CREATE USER testacl IDENTIFIED BY testacl;
User created.
SQL> GRANT CONNECT TO testacl;
Grant succeeded.
SQL>
SQL> BEGIN
2     dbms_network_acl_admin.create_acl('test_smtp.xml','TEST SMTP ACL','TESTACL',true,'connect');
3     dbms_network_acl_admin.assign_acl('test_smtp.xml','localhost',25);
4     commit;
5 END;
6 /
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL> SELECT host, lower_port, upper_port, acl FROM dba_network_acls;
HOST                 LOWER_PORT UPPER_PORT ACL
localhost                    25         25 /sys/acls/test_smtp.xml
SQL> SELECT acl,principal,privilege,is_grant FROM dba_network_acl_privileges;
ACL                                      PRINCIPAL       PRIVILEGE IS_GRANT
/sys/acls/test_smtp.xml                  TESTACL         connect    true
After creating this ACL I test it like this:
SQL> CONNECT testacl/testacl@testdb
Connected.
SQL> SELECT host, lower_port, upper_port, privilege, status FROM user_network_acl_privileges;
HOST                 LOWER_PORT UPPER_PORT PRIVILEGE STATUS
localhost                    25         25 connect    GRANTED
SQL> DECLARE
2     c utl_smtp.connection;
3 BEGIN
4     c := utl_smtp.open_connection('localhost', 25); -- SMTP on port 25
5     utl_smtp.helo(c, 'localhost');
6     utl_smtp.mail(c, 'Oracle11.2');
7     utl_smtp.rcpt(c, '[email protected]');
8     utl_smtp.data(c,'From: Oracle'||utl_tcp.crlf||'To: [email protected]'||utl_tcp.crlf||'Subject: UTL_SMTP TEST'||utl_tcp.crlf||'');
9     utl_smtp.quit(c);
10 END;
11 /
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL>
This works fine and I receive the email correctly. Now if I try to do the same thing for a role:
SQL> CONNECT system/******@testdb
Connected.
SQL> BEGIN
2     dbms_network_acl_admin.drop_acl('test_smtp.xml');
3     commit;
4 END;
5 /
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL> SELECT host, lower_port, upper_port, acl FROM dba_network_acls;
no rows selected
SQL> CREATE ROLE testacl_role;
Role created.
SQL> GRANT testacl_role TO testacl;
Grant succeeded.
SQL> ALTER USER testacl DEFAULT ROLE ALL;
User altered.
SQL>
SQL> BEGIN
2     dbms_network_acl_admin.create_acl('test_smtp.xml','TEST SMTP ACL','TESTACL_ROLE',true,'connect');
3     dbms_network_acl_admin.assign_acl('test_smtp.xml','localhost',25);
4     commit;
5 END;
6 /
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL> SELECT host, lower_port, upper_port, acl FROM dba_network_acls;
HOST                 LOWER_PORT UPPER_PORT ACL
localhost                    25         25 /sys/acls/test_smtp.xml
SQL> SELECT acl,principal,privilege,is_grant FROM dba_network_acl_privileges;
ACL                                      PRINCIPAL       PRIVILEGE IS_GRANT
/sys/acls/test_smtp.xml                  TESTACL_ROLE    connect    true
SQL>
And now I test it again with the same user:
SQL> CONNECT testacl/testacl@testdb
Connected.
SQL>
SQL> SELECT host, lower_port, upper_port, privilege, status FROM user_network_acl_privileges;
no rows selected
SQL> DECLARE
2     c utl_smtp.connection;
3 BEGIN
4     c := utl_smtp.open_connection('localhost', 25); -- SMTP on port 25
5     utl_smtp.helo(c, 'localhost');
6     utl_smtp.mail(c, 'Oracle11.2');
7     utl_smtp.rcpt(c, '[email protected]');
8     utl_smtp.data(c,'From: Oracle'||utl_tcp.crlf||'To: [email protected]'||utl_tcp.crlf||'Subject: UTL_SMTP TEST'||utl_tcp.crlf||'');
9     utl_smtp.quit(c);
10 END;
11 /
DECLARE
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-24247: network access denied by access control list (ACL)
ORA-06512: at "SYS.UTL_TCP", line 17
ORA-06512: at "SYS.UTL_TCP", line 267
ORA-06512: at "SYS.UTL_SMTP", line 161
ORA-06512: at "SYS.UTL_SMTP", line 197
ORA-06512: at line 4
SQL>
I'm aware that role privileges doesn't apply inside procedures, functions or packages by default, but this is an anonymous block so it should use the active roles for the user. I also tried adding a "dbms_session.set_role('TESTACL_ROLE');" at the beggining of the anonymous PL/SQL block but I got the same access error.
Thanks in advance for any help you can give to me on this question, it would be very hard to grant the ACL to all the individual users as they are more than 1000, and we create more regularly.

Thanks for your quick reply... I don't have a problem creating the basic ACL with the privileges granted for a user. The problem appears when I try to create an ACL with privileges for a ROLE. You can see here http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E11882_01/appdev.112/e25788/d_networkacl_adm.htm#BABIGEGG than the official Oracle documentation states that you can assign the ACL principal to be a user or role:
Parameter
Description
acl
Name of the ACL. Relative path will be relative to "/sys/acls".
description
Description attribute in the ACL
principal
Principal (database user or role) to whom the privilege is granted or denied. Case sensitive.
My issue is that when I try to create the ACL for a role it doesn't work.
Have you ever created an ACL for a role? if so please send me an example or let me know which step I might be missing. Cheers.

Problem creating hierarchy based on 2 physical dimension tables

I'm having a problem creating 1 logical dimension with a drill-down hierarchy, based on two separate physical dimension tables. The errors I receive when navigating the drill-down hierarchy is:
"Cannot find logical table source coverage for logical columns" &
"Missing join between logical tables".
I'm using OBIEE 10.1.3.4
Here are the details of what I have setup sofar:
Physical layer:
Dimension table DIM_ORG with columns:
-dimension_key
-org_total_code
-org_total_description
-org_detail_code
-org_detail_description
Dimension table DIM_DEPT with columns:
-dimension_key
-dept_total_code
-dept_total_description
-dept_detail_code
-dept_detail_description
Fact table FACT_SALES with columns:
-fk_org
-fk_dept
-sum_sales
Physical Joins:
FACT_SALES.fk_org = DIM_ORG_dimension_key
FACT_SALES.fl_dept = DIM_DEPT.dimension_key
Business Model & Mapping layer:
I created a logical dimension ORG_DEPT. It contains two logical table sources (DIM_ORG & DIM_DEPT) and the following logical columns:
- All Departments (mapped to dept_total_code)
- Organisation (mapped to org_detail_description)
- Organisation Number (mapped to org_detail_code)
- Department (mapped to dept_detail_description)
- Department Code (mapped to dept_detail_code)
The business logical key is based on the combination of Organisation Number & Department Code
The hierarchy I need is: All Departments -> Organisation -> Department so I created the following hierarchy for ORG_DEPT:
- Total Level containing: All Departments
- Organisation Level containing: Organisation Number (defined as the Logical level key) & Organisation (defined als the Drill level key)
- Detail Department Level containing: Department Code (defined as Logical level key) and Department (defined as Drill level key).
In the LTS of the dimension ORG_DEPT I've set the Content levels for the sources:
DIM_ORG : Organisation Level
DIM_DEPT: Detail Department Level
In the LTS no -inner- joins have been added against related physical tables.
I created a logical fact table SALES (based on the physical fact table) and joined it against the logical dimension table ORG_DEPT.
In the LTS the Content level for ORG_DEPT is set against the Detail Department Level. No - inner- joins have been aded against related physical tables.
When I create a report in Answers to test the hierachy and select only 'All Departments' I get the correct dimension value returned. When I try to drill to the next level I get the following ODBC error:
"Cannot find logical table source coverage for logical columns: [All Departments]. Please check more detailed level keys are mapped correctly".
When I create a report in Answers and select both 'All Departments' and 'Sales' I get the correct result. When I try to drill to the next level I get a different ODBC error:
"Missing join between logical tables DIM_DEPT and DIM_DEPT: There must be at least one physical join link between the underlying physical tables".
Any suggestions are welcome!
Thanks!

Hello Robert,
Your suggestions were known to me but I still wanted to combine the two physical dimension tables in one logical dimension. So I've played around a bit more and found the solution: In my original setup I had two seperate logical table sources (one for each physical dimension table). The solution was to combine the two logical table sources in one logical table source. I achieved that by logical joining the DIM_DEPT table to the FACT_SALES table and subsequently to the DIM_ORG within the 1 LTS and using inner joins.
Then I created the logical table key (a combination of org_detail_code & dept_detail_code). After that I could create the hierarchy with no problem.
Edited by: The_Dutchman on Nov 4, 2011 9:43 PM

Problem Creating VirtualProviders Based on the DTP

Problem Creating VirtualProviders Based on the Data Transfer Process .
(1) I have created an Data Source(extract structure and extractor) on SYS1. Tested the extractor. It returns data as desired.
(2) Then I replicated this Data Source to SYS2.
(3) In SYS1 I created InfoCube(VirtualProvider based on data transfer process for direct access) .
Till this point I have no issues .
(4) But after that I am not able to "Create Data Transfer Process" for this Virtual Infoprovider . When I try to create DTP the DTP type available for selection is "Scheduled" where as per the documentation I need to create DTP of DTP type "DTP for Direct Access".This DTP type I donot see.
Is it a problem with the BW configuration or some user error.Any suggestions which may help would be realy appreciated.
Thanks & Regards,
priyadarshi

Corrected some typo in my earlier update...
Problem Creating VirtualProviders Based on the Data Transfer Process .
(1) I have created an Data Source(extract structure and extractor) on SYS1. Tested the extractor. It returns data as desired.
(2) Then I replicated this Data Source to SYS2.
(3) In SYS2 I created InfoCube(VirtualProvider based on data transfer process for direct access) .
Till this point I have no issues .
(4) But after that I am not able to "Create Data Transfer Process" for this Virtual Infoprovider . When I try to create DTP the DTP type available for selection is "Standard(Scheduled)" where as per the documentation I need to create DTP of DTP type "DTP for Direct Access".This DTP type I donot see.
Is it a problem with the BW configuration or some user error.Any suggestions which may help would be realy appreciated.
Thanks & Regards,
priyadarshi

Problem creating backend PO in ECC

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for