Problem in accessing room document

Hi,
i m facing very strange problem. I am a member of the team room. in that room, under the public are, there is one document but I am unable to view that document even that is under public area.
plz help...
regards
ram

Check this.
1. Deletion flag is set or not.?
2. Execute MCDOKDEL and check for the document
3. Archiving path Storage Path location.?
Thanks
S.N.

Similar Messages

How can I get the 23 July update to load onto my iPad. I haven't been able to access my documents or work for weeks and need to use it. Has anyone else had similar problems?

How can I get the 23 July update to load onto my iPad. I haven't been able to access my documents or work for weeks and need to use it. Has anyone else had similar problems?

Hello Arthur,
Thank you for the reply.
You were correct that deleting the app and reinstalling it was the only thing to make it work but unfortunately I lost all the documents I made, even though they were backed up to iCloud before i deleted the app. At the same time as deleting pages I had to delete keynote and numbers too, so I've lost all the documents in them too.
The mb of data which was assigned to each programme in iCloud has reduced, so. I guess they are gone for good. Is there any other way to reaccess them?
Not your fault but I am a bit fed up the the iPad. I have lost work that I've done and have no other copy apart from what was in iCloud, as I don't have a printer and couldn't email them too myself as I couldn't get into the programme and i've also got episodes of tv series I purchased that I can't download and albums that are half downloaded with songs missing, so I feel a bit swindled out of time and money and am going back to DVD , pen and paper and CDs .
Instead of using iCloud I guess the only way to make sure I don't loose any more documents it to email them to myself each time I save them on the iPad. Is there anything else you could suggest please?
I don't have any other apple products apart from iPods, so I can't access the iCloud on anything else can I?
Thanks
Amanda

TS1702 I tried to download the upgrade, now it won't install and I can not access my documents. It said Vi did not have enough space for the upgrade so I made room but still no luck.

I tried to download the upgrade, now it won't install and I can not access my documents. It said Vi did not have enough space for the upgrade so I made room but still no luck. If I delete the ap and reinstall I will lose my stuff. Any ideas? It won't open so I can email it to myself.

What upgrade are you trying to install? Your profile shows iOS 5.1.1, which is the current max iOS.
 Cheers, Tom

Problems while accessing images outside the web document-root folder

Our application runs on Oracle application server on Linux. Facing problems while accessing images outside the web document-root folder. This works with changes in global-web-application.xml by including the <virtual-directory> tag. The same change does not work when done on Linux machine. It is unable to find the image. Please help in resolving this issue.
</locale-encoding-mapping>
</locale-encoding-mapping-list>
</web-app>
<virtual-directory virtual-path="/img" real-path="/home/eposuat/" />
</orion-web-app>
Code in the jsp:
<img width=700 height=700 src="/img/3.tif"></img>
<img width=700 height=700 src="/img/WB.gif"></img>

This is one of the least satisfactory aspects of site management in Dreamweaver, and several developers, including myself, have been pressuring the Dreamweaver team for some years to improve this. Who knows? They might eventually take notice.
The only way to do this at the moment is to create two site definitions, one nested inside the other. Set up the site definition normally based on htdocs as your site root. Then create a new site definition based on site. Dreamweaver will nag you that it can cause problems, but it won't actually stop you from doing it. The only potential problem is with site synchronization.
The problem with using site as the only basis for your site definition is that Dreamweaver automatically puts things like the Connections, Scripts, and other folders in the site root. So, everything ends up at the wrong level of the site hierarchy. Quite frankly, the whole thing is a bit of a pain. Dynamic site development was added to Dreamweaver only in version 6 (Dreamweaver MX), and no one had really thought through the need to store files outside the site root.

How do I resolve this problem: This server could not verify that you are authorized to access the document requested. Either you supplied the wrong credentials (e.g., bad password), or your browser doesn't understand how to supply the credentials required

When attempting to log in to the web site the following message is received. This web site works
on other systems using Firefox.
This server could not verify that you are authorized to access the document requested. Either you supplied the wrong credentials (e.g., bad password), or your browser doesn't understand how to supply the credentials required.
Additionally, a 401 Authorization Required error was encountered while trying to use an ErrorDocument to handle the request.
== URL of affected sites ==
http://www.mdyc.org/members_only

You may have saved a bad password so Firefox is entering that rather than giving you the option to try again. Go to Tools > Options > Security > Saved Passwords and delete the saved passwords for that site and then try logging in again.

A network error occurred while accessing this document on the internet

Dear all,
I am now facing a very unusual problem that, when I try to open a pdf file from internet, it says: "A network error occurred while accessing this document on the Internet. Would you like to close the document or reload it?". Here's my situation:
Browser: IE8 (or Chrome 35.0.1916.153)
Adobe Reader: 11.0.0
OS: Win7
1.Directly open from IE. Says: "A network error occurred while accessing this document on the Internet. Would you like to close the document or reload it?"
2.Try to download(Save AS). In IE, says: "The connection was reset The connection to the server was reset while the page was loading"; In Chrome, nothing happened, but still can't download.
3.Try to disable the "PDF Reader Addon" in IE8. First the browser needs to download the PDF file, but failed, see point 2.
1.I can open the same PDF file from another network, that is, out of my company.
2.I can open another PDF file in the network of my company, but the pdf is created by another scanner
3.All PDFs from both scanner can be opened locally.
So, here's the possible problem, the network settings, and(or) the PDF. Does anyone ever meet this situation, please help?
Thank very much.
Li

Rave,
IE: 8 & 9
Adobe Acrobat Pro/Acrobat Reader 10.x & 11.x
Chrome: work fine
So the answer is to manually enable and disable websites based on whether the pdfs open within the browser. That doesn't seem like a great long-term solution to have have our users to manually enable / disable browser integration. We have web applications that work better with browser integration turned on. Is this something that Adobe will fix or is it an IIS/IE issue.
It appears the Adobe removed the #1 config option that you lised in the new 11.x versions of both products. The manage Add-ons does not disable the browser integration on the new Adobe versions.

HT201380 Yesterday this was automatically installed. Today I can't access a document in Pages. A prompt says I need a Pages update. But the next screen tests for updates and informs me everything is up to date. What's up?

Yesterday this was automatically installed. Today I can't access a document in Pages. A prompt says I need a Pages update. But the next screen tests for updates and informs me everything is up to date. What's up?

It's highly unlikely that the Pages update problem has anything to do with the ARD client update, since the client is not involved in any way with Software Update. I'd suggest asking for assistance with the update problem in the forum appropriate for your version of Mac OS X.
Regards.

Oracle Text - Problem with filtering binary documents (.doc, .pdf, etc...)

Hi, I have a problem with filtering binary documents (.doc, .pdf, etc...). I use SQL*PLUS for remote access to Oracle 10.2 on Linux and I create table:
CREATE TABLE test (id NUMBER PRIMARY KEY, text VARCHAR2(100));
I insert to this table:
INSERT into test values(1, 'PATH/text1.doc‘);
INSERT into test values(2,'PATH/text2.doc‘);
and then:
CREATE INDEX test_index ON test(text) indextype is ctxsys.context
parameters (’datastore ctxsys.file_datastore
filter ctxsys.auto_filter’);
Message "Index created" is displayed, but objects: DR$test_index$I, DR$test_index$K, DR$test_index$N, DR$test_index$R and DR$test_index$P are empty => index wasn´t created probably.
I don´t know, where is bug, either bug is somewhere in this code or on the server (wrong installation oracle or constraint privileges). Do you know in what is bug?

The following is an excerpt from the 10g online documentation. Note the items that I have put in bold.
"FILE_DATASTORE
The FILE_DATASTORE type is used for text stored in files accessed through the local file system.
Note:
FILE_DATASTORE may not work with certain types of remote mounted file systems.
FILE_DATASTORE has the following attribute(s):
Table 2-4 FILE_DATASTORE Attributes
Attribute Attribute Value
path path1:path2:pathn
path
Specify the full directory path name of the files stored externally in a file system. When you specify the full directory path as such, you need only include file names in your text column.
You can specify multiple paths for path, with each path separated by a colon (:) on UNIX and semicolon(;) on Windows. File names are stored in the text column in the text table.
If you do not specify a path for external files with this attribute, Oracle Text requires that the path be included in the file names stored in the text column.
PATH Attribute Limitations
The PATH attribute has the following limitations:
If you specify a PATH attribute, you can only use a simple filename in the indexed column. You cannot combine the PATH attribute with a path as part of the filename. If the files exist in multiple folders or directories, you must leave the PATH attribute unset, and include the full file name, with PATH, in the indexed column.
On Windows systems, the files must be located on a local drive. They cannot be on a remote drive, whether the remote drive is mapped to a local drive letter."
With accessible paths and files, you get something like:
SCOTT@orcl_11g> CREATE TABLE test (id NUMBER PRIMARY KEY, text VARCHAR2(100));
Table created.
SCOTT@orcl_11g>
SCOTT@orcl_11g>
SCOTT@orcl_11g> INSERT into test values(1,'c:\oracle11g\banana.pdf');
1 row created.
SCOTT@orcl_11g> INSERT into test values(2,'c:\oracle11g\cranberry.pdf');
1 row created.
SCOTT@orcl_11g>
SCOTT@orcl_11g> CREATE INDEX test_index ON test(text) indextype is ctxsys.context
2 parameters ('datastore ctxsys.file_datastore
3 filter ctxsys.auto_filter');
Index created.
SCOTT@orcl_11g>
SCOTT@orcl_11g> select count(*) from dr$test_index$i
2 /
COUNT(*)
608
SCOTT@orcl_11g> In the following, I used a non-existent path and non-existent file name, which produces the same results as when you use a remote path that does not exist locally.
SCOTT@orcl_11g> CREATE TABLE test (id NUMBER PRIMARY KEY, text VARCHAR2(100));
Table created.
SCOTT@orcl_11g>
SCOTT@orcl_11g>
SCOTT@orcl_11g> INSERT into test values(3,'c:\nosuchpath\nosuchfile.pdf');
1 row created.
SCOTT@orcl_11g>
SCOTT@orcl_11g> CREATE INDEX test_index ON test(text) indextype is ctxsys.context
2 parameters ('datastore ctxsys.file_datastore
3 filter ctxsys.auto_filter');
Index created.
SCOTT@orcl_11g>
SCOTT@orcl_11g> select count(*) from dr$test_index$i
2 /
COUNT(*)
0
SCOTT@orcl_11g>

"Adobe Acrobat is blocked" - Where to I accept the end user agreement which will enable me to access Pdf documents on the web?

I keep getting this message when trying to open documents from the web:
"Adobe Acrobat is blocked" -
Where to I accept the end user agreement which will enable me to access Pdf documents on the web?
The Adobe website recommends this: (did not solve the problem)
Safari 7 and 6.1 block PDFs | Acrobat, Reader
Thanks for any help solving this annoying problem!
OSX 10.9.3
Safari 7.0.4
Acrobat Pro 11.0.0

Hello Isakten:
Thanks so much for your reply!
I already have Adobe Reader 11.0.7 and Adobe Acrobat Pro 9 installed.
Following your instructions, I then selected Reader as the desired Adobe product to open all PDFs. and save that choice. Still no difference, the same black screen and statement about the EULA shows up…
http://www.nhgastro.net/patients.html
BTW, this is the website that I was accessing……note the link to download and print the pdf which triggers the EULA page.
and also downloaded the latest version of Reader via their link….but to no success…..
This all started by itself months ago, I did no newer installs or settings changes, none……
Any other thoughts?
Thanks so much,
Steve

Removed user from group, user no longer has access to documents even though user is owner of documents

I'm running a server 2012 std domain and I'm in the process of rebuilding our fileserver after we had some pretty serious permission issues. Bad permissions (Everyone had full access to user documents share) were migrated when we move to the new server and
then by some strange Monday morning freak out all users lost access to their documents. I restored from backups, redirected everyone's folders back to local computer and started to reconfigure the share permissions. I moved our administration group back to
the server after securing proper permissions for folder redirection (permissions copied from https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/jj649078.aspx?f=255&MSPPError=-2147217396 table 1, only difference is instead of creating a new security group
for redirection users, I used the everyone group) to test and everything went perfectly. The GPO created the users folders under the root and redirection was good to go. Along with that, other users cannot access other users documents anymore which was the
intended outcome.
Last night I was looking at security groups and see that our administration group (back office group: accounting, HR, etc..) was a member of the domain admins. I removed them from the domain admins group and added them to the administrators group (they do
need regular admin access) then went on like normal. This morning, all users in that group can no longer access their documents on the server. I immediately think that permissions were broken again and started to get angry, but then realize that all the files
are still accessible on the server (no lost permissions like before) and the user is still shown as the owner with full permissions, but the files are inaccessible to those users. I re-added them to the domain admins group, logged out, logged back in and documents
are back and accessible by the user. Remove them from the domain admins group, log out, log back in and the documents are inaccessible again. Re-add to the domain admins group and back to normal.
Which leads me to now. If the users are part of the domain admins group, they have access to their files. If they are removed from the domain admins group, they lose access. When they lose access, they are still the owners of the files/folders with full
permissions, yet they can't access their documents. Also, just to add, the domain admins group has no specified permissions on the files or folders. See screenshots below..
Here is the root share.
And the user's desktop folder. The folder is owned by the user with full permissions. This is the folder the redirection GPO created.
Any ideas why removing the group from domain admins would drop access to their files? They are still the owners of the files and should have full access but they don't. Is there something I'm not seeing here?

Effective Access shows the user has full control of the Desktop folder
This is a problem with the Effective Access tab when using CREATOR OWNER. As you have noticed, the user doesn't really have the access that the tab says it does. This is because of how CREATOR OWNER works.
CREATOR OWNER is only evaluated when a file/folder is created.
IF a user can create a file/folder, then the permissions assigned to CREATOR OWNER are copied to a new permissions entry for that user.
To see this:
Logon as an administrator and create a file in the Desktop folder in your screenshot.
Examine the permissions of the new file.
You'll see that there is a new entry for the account you logged on with.
CREATOR OWNER is gone. CREATOR OWNER would still be there if you created a folder (because of "subfolders and files").
In the Desktop folder (in your screenshot), only SYSTEM and Administrator can create/access files.
To fix this, you need to grant the users the ability to list the directory contents and create new files/folders. This corresponds with the suggestion of Table 1 in the document you found.
I see what you're saying about Administrators domain group. I'll just add them as local admins via GPO and that should solve that issue.
No, scary! This will grant those users administrative permission on your server. They will be able to see any file anywhere on that server.
If your goal is to provide a place that is private for each user, then the simplest approach is to grant each user permission to their own folder. Like this for Test User:
Notes for above:
I set the user's permission to Modify because there is no good reason why the user should change these permissions
The owner of this folder is unimportant. I leave it set to Administrators
You can, and I do, remove CREATOR OWNER. It adds no value in this situation and just causes confusion.
As for the second screen shot, the *-Admins folder is the root to which Everyone has special permissions on and can create folders. The folder for M* was created by the GPO, which makes M* the owner to which they have Full control of subfolders and files.
The GPO also created the Desktop folder, giving owner full permissions of subfolders and files. Inside the Desktop folder, permissions remain Full control for owner for subfolders and files. Even if it was the case that they only had permissions on subfolders
and files, wouldn't each subfolder under that one be considered a subfolder and file of the top folder?
If this works as you say, then Yes, it should work. But, I don't see the entries for use M*. Remember, there should be entries for the M* user that is a duplicate of CREATOR OWNER.
I suspect that Group Policy is creating the directories (elevated) and then changing the owner to M* afterward. This does not duplicate the CREATOR OWNER entries as needed. If this is the case, I consider it a flaw because your permissions do
not allow user M* to create files/folders, and group policy shouldn't bypass security.
I'm not saying your wrong, I'm just curious why the technet article would advise Creator/Owner giving full control of subfolders and files only if that were not correct. I can add the permissions for the users easily, I just don't see why I need to give
explicit permissions to access something when the GPO created those folders for me, which Microsoft recommends you allow. If the GPO can create folders and the folders are owned by the user, then the user can obviously add/create/modify/view those files and
folders.
When I restored the data, no permission were reset. Permissions were restored to the wonky version where the Everyone group has full access to everything. Ownership of the files/folders remained the same.
A couple things:
The article instructed the use of Folder Redirection Users group that had permissions to create files. Your examples didn't have that. Because of this, your user could create new files.
The article assumes that the directories you are creating will be empty. Existing files will be unreadable to everyone except Admins.
If you follow the directions in the article, then anyone in the Folder Redirection Users group can write files to anyone else's directory.
One benefit of the document's approach is that all the users could be redirected to the same folder using the article, and it would work. A benefit, I guess.
But, I like my user's separate and unable to see each other's files -- at all. This is why I recommend replacing CREATOR OWNER with the specific user.
I believe this document is a "how to get it done" document, not necessarily a best practices document. I see it as a starting point, and that's why I didn't follow it exactly.
Lastly, CREATOR OWNER permissions are useful but confusing. I avoid them unless I have the rare circumstance where they are perfect.
When I restored the data, no permission were reset. Permissions were restored to the wonky version where the Everyone group has full access to everything. Ownership of the files/folders remained the same.
To summarize:
In the user's directory, you need to provide permission to list and create new files/folders, and you need grant the user permission to the existing files.
-Tony

Accessing excel documents fom KM

Hi all
I have a problem accessing excel documents in Hebrew from the KM.
If the document's name length is more then 23 characters (in Hebrew),I get a "This page cannot be displayed" error.
It happens only if I work with Excel 2002 (XP) version.
Excel 2003 works fine,but I cannot upgrade my ~1500 workstations now.
Last year we had almost the same problem - like this:
<a href="https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/thread?forumID=42&threadID=45589&messageID=459760#459760">https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/thread?forumID=42&threadID=45589&messageID=459760#459760</a>
The problem was solved by Microsoft fix :
KB Article Number(s): 918692
Any suggestions?
Thanks
Alexander

Hi Alexander,
you could use the GUID instead of the displayname, it is unique, fixed in length and does not depend on language settings.
I guess you will have to write a custom property handler for that, but maybe this can be done through configuration only ...
That could be a workaround for your problem ...
regards
Jan

A network error occure while accessing this document

Hi,
I am getting the error "A network error occured while accessing this document on interntet. Would you like to close the document or reload it?".
I have tried re-installations etc.. but none helped.
Please let me know if anyone has encountered this problem and overcome it.
Using Adobe Reader 9.3.2 and opening from ESS/MSS application.
Thanks,
Raghavendra

I figured out what the problem is. There is a setting in the user's IE browser and Adobe program that is causing the PDF form to open in a browser window in IE instead of in Adobe Reader. The form we're using is too big to load in a browser and must be loaded in Adobe Reader instead. To fix the problem, the user needs to make the following changes to his/her settings:
1. In Adobe, go to the Edit menu and select Preferences. Under 'Internet', make sure the box for 'Display PDF in browser' is unchecked. Click OK to save your changes.
2. In IE, go to the Tools menu and click on 'Manage Add-ons'. Then, click on Adobe Reader and click the Disable button. I think this should disable the built-in Reader in IE, so PDFs will have to open in Reader instead of in the browser.
Once our users changed these settings they were able to access our form online.
Hope this helps!

Problems while uploading text documents into Unicode Database

I just upgraded our database from 9iR1 to 9iR2 (9.2.0.1.0). The server
character set is AL32UTF8. Now I'm facing a problem when
uploading text documents into the database via a web frontend.
I use the upload table defined for the PL/SQL Database Access Descriptor:
create table TB_UPLOAD (
NAME VARCHAR2(256) not null,
MIME_TYPE VARCHAR2(128),
DOC_SIZE NUMBER,
DAD_CHARSET VARCHAR2(128),
LAST_UPDATED DATE,
CONTENT_TYPE VARCHAR2(128),
BLOB_CONTENT BLOB);
After uploading a text document containing the two words "hallo welt",
the following statement returns not "hallo welt", but "68616C6C6F2077656C74":
declare
b_loc blob;
v_amount integer := 100;
v_buffer varchar2(100);
v_offset integer := 1;
begin
select blob_content into b_loc from tb_upload where name like 'mydoc.txt';
dbms_lob.read(b_loc, v_amount, v_offset, v_buffer);
htp.prn(v_buffer);
end;
What is this? I studied the documentation, but didn't found a solution.
When trying to use Oracle's built-in procedure wpg_docload.download_file,
the content is shown the way it should be. Unfortunately, I can't use
wpg_docload.download_file in order to copy the BLOB content to another table.
Any hints would be appreciated!
Thanks so much in advance!
Roman
E-Mail: [email protected]

Hi Roman,
the upload uses a BLOB (Binary Lob). Your Document is
stored as is in the binary representation. If you
use dbms_lob.read on a blob and your buffer is a varchar2 the binary representation is not translated!!!
use a raw for the buffer and utl_raw.cast_to_varchar2
to do the conversion to varchar.
try this
Procedure SHOW_DOC(p_name doc_test.name%TYPE)
IS
v_len number;
v_mime_type tb_upload.mime_type%TYPE;
v_offset integer := 1;
v_Buf_size integer := 32767;
v_buf raw(32767);
v_blob blob;
v_Doc_name varchar2(1000);
BEGIN
v_doc_name := url_Decode(p_name);
select mime_type,doc_size,blob_content
into v_mime_Type,v_len,v_blob
from tb_upload
where name = v_doc_name;
OWA_UTIL.MIME_HEADER(v_Mime_Type);
begin
LOOP
DBMS_LOB.READ(v_blob,v_buf_size,v_offset,v_buf);
HTP.PRN(UTL_RAW.CAST_TO_VARCHAR2(v_buf));
v_offset := v_offset + v_buf_size;
END LOOP;
exception
when no_data_found then
null;
end;
END;
HTH
detlev

Problems while uploading text documents into Database

I just upgraded our database from 9iR1 to 9iR2 (9.2.0.1.0). The server
character set is AL32UTF8. Now I'm facing a problem when
uploading text documents into the database via a web frontend.
I use the upload table defined for the PL/SQL Database Access Descriptor:
create table TB_UPLOAD (
NAME VARCHAR2(256) not null,
MIME_TYPE VARCHAR2(128),
DOC_SIZE NUMBER,
DAD_CHARSET VARCHAR2(128),
LAST_UPDATED DATE,
CONTENT_TYPE VARCHAR2(128),
BLOB_CONTENT BLOB);
After uploading a text document containing the two words "hallo welt",
the following statement returns not "hallo welt", but "68616C6C6F2077656C74":
declare
b_loc blob;
v_amount integer := 100;
v_buffer varchar2(100);
v_offset integer := 1;
begin
select blob_content into b_loc from tb_upload where name like 'mydoc.txt';
dbms_lob.read(b_loc, v_amount, v_offset, v_buffer);
htp.prn(v_buffer);
end;
What is this? I studied the documentation, but didn't found a solution.
When trying to use Oracle's built-in procedure wpg_docload.download_file,
the content is shown the way it should be. Unfortunately, I can't use
wpg_docload.download_file in order to copy the BLOB content to another table.
Any hints would be appreciated!
Thanks so much in advance!
Roman
E-Mail: [email protected]

Hi Roman,
the upload uses a BLOB (Binary Lob). Your Document is
stored as is in the binary representation. If you
use dbms_lob.read on a blob and your buffer is a varchar2 the binary representation is not translated!!!
use a raw for the buffer and utl_raw.cast_to_varchar2
to do the conversion to varchar.
try this
Procedure SHOW_DOC(p_name doc_test.name%TYPE)
IS
v_len number;
v_mime_type tb_upload.mime_type%TYPE;
v_offset integer := 1;
v_Buf_size integer := 32767;
v_buf raw(32767);
v_blob blob;
v_Doc_name varchar2(1000);
BEGIN
v_doc_name := url_Decode(p_name);
select mime_type,doc_size,blob_content
into v_mime_Type,v_len,v_blob
from tb_upload
where name = v_doc_name;
OWA_UTIL.MIME_HEADER(v_Mime_Type);
begin
LOOP
DBMS_LOB.READ(v_blob,v_buf_size,v_offset,v_buf);
HTP.PRN(UTL_RAW.CAST_TO_VARCHAR2(v_buf));
v_offset := v_offset + v_buf_size;
END LOOP;
exception
when no_data_found then
null;
end;
END;
HTH
detlev

Forbidden; You don't have permission to access this document on this server.

I am trying to request Daily iTunes U log reports and I am getting the following error: Forbidden You don't have permission to access this document on this server.
Does any one know what it means? Is Identity necessary?
The URL I am using look like:
http://deimos.apple.com/WebObjects/Core.woa/API/GetDailyReportLogs/example.edu?StartDate=2011-05-01&EndDate=2011-06-01&credentials=Administrator@urn:mace:itunesu.com:sites:example.edu&identity=&signature=38bda70d9aa6975ae8756754034feb6e3c794aca4b21665f6dc85d2ed4 2d4f6b

Check to make sure that the user in question doesn't have something in their Hosts file on their desktop. Otherwise I don't see why SharePoint or the load balancer should be sending them to an Apache Unix web server when trying to resolve Office
Web Apps. Something is misdirecting the http request for that user to the wrong server. If its just one user then I would suspect that something is wrong with TCP/IP locally.
Paul Stork SharePoint Server MVP
Principal Architect: Blue Chip Consulting Group
Blog: http://dontpapanic.com/blog
Twitter: Follow @pstork
Please remember to mark your question as "answered" if this solves your problem.

Problem in accessing room document

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for