Problem in accounting type m

hi Co Guru...
when i do GR with t code mb31 movement type..101..
showing the message..
mesage type; F5714..
ACCOUNTING TYPE M AND G/L ACCOUNT WITH OPEN ITEM MANAGEMENT NOT PERMITTED....
PROCEDURE...
CHANGE THE MASTER DATA FOR G/L ACCOUNT 3900 IN COMPANY CODE V3& ACCORDINGLY..
kindly plz suggest me...
Thanx
regards

Hello Aqueel,
Account type M and G/L account with open item management not permitted
Message no. F5 714
Diagnosis
Account type 'M' and G/L account number '#########' (company code '####') have occurred in a certain
line item. The G/L account is run with open items.
System Response
This combination is not permitted in the financial accounting application.
I check in tcode FS00
'Control Data' tab.
Account Management in Company Code
Open Item Management (please review the F1 help on this field)
F1 Help.
Indicator: Open Item Management
Determines that open items are managed for this account.
Use
Items posted to accounts managed on an open
item basis are marked as open or cleared.
The balance of these accounts is always
equal to the balance of the open items.
Examples
Accounts that ARE managed on an open item basis include:
Clearing accounts:
Bank clearing account
Payroll clearing account
Cash discount clearing account
GR/IR clearing account
Accounts that are NOT managed on an open item basis:
Bank accounts
Tax accounts
Raw material accounts
Reconciliation accounts
These are managed implicitly using the subledger open item function.
Profit and loss accounts
Materials Management (MM) accounts posted with a posting key that has account type M
My understanding from this is that the 'Open Item Management' is not to be used for Materials Management.
Cheers,
Daniela

Similar Messages

Problem with "Fill" account type

I want to use "Fill" account type so users could enter some value and it would be evenly distributed into months, but when i enter a value into quarter it is distributed properly as Qtr1 = 10, Jan = 10, Feb = 10, March = 10, BUT after saving a form i get 30 in Qtr1, this happens becuase there is a "+" aggregation in months in Quarters in Period dimension? And is it possible to be fixed?

Try adding a decimal in the final calculation ie.
val*=10.0;
Either that or implicity declare that value as a float also. I think your calcualtion is being converted to a double because you're multiplying by an int, but I'm not sure.
Let us know how you get on.

Trying to change account type in MAIL to allow POP3 to connect to my Yahoo?

Can anyone help me with this mail feature...
I am trying to add my yahoo mail account to the MAIL option/ feature on my MAC, and it is not letting me without signing up to Yahoo Plus account.
However, I have found this site:
http://help.yahoo.com/l/us/yahoo/smallbusiness/bizmail/pop/pop-03.html
and
http://www.emailaddressmanager.com/tips/mail-settings.html
Which states you can enter it through POP3 account type.
I have tried this By going to MAIl> PREFERENCES> ADD ACCOUNT.
then when I add in account type from the drop down menu it only has POP available and NOT POP3 option like it states in that web site to use.
And when I try to add the account I get this message:
Logging in to mail server “plus.pop.mail.yahoo.com” failed. This server may require an additional fee for Yahoo! POP access. For more information, visit Yahoo! Mail Plus. If you continue, you might not be able to receive messages.
So I have tried to continue and just add the outgoing and ingoing info that the site stated and I still can't get it to work. I think the main problem is getting the POP changed to POP3?
How do I do this. So I can use my yahoo account on the MAIL feature.
Is there a new updated MAIL feature? I have the MAIl Version 4.1 (1076)?
Does this only let you use Yahoo Plus mail? I don't want to upgrade since it charges you a fee to have this e-mail account.
Any information?
Kelli

So at the previously mentioned web-site: It stated
Yahoo! Mail Settings
Yahoo Mail offers standard POP3 access for receiving emails incoming through your Yahoo mailbox, by using your favorite email client software. To setup your email client for working with your Yahoo account, you need to select the POP3 protocol and use the following mail server settings:
Yahoo Incoming Mail Server (POP3) - pop.mail.yahoo.com (port 110)
Yahoo Outgoing Mail Server (SMTP) - smtp.mail.yahoo.com (port 25)
POP Yahoo! Mail Plus email server settings
Yahoo Plus Incoming Mail Server (POP3) - plus.pop.mail.yahoo.com (SSL enabled, port 995)
Yahoo Plus Outgoing Mail Server (SMTP) - plus.smtp.mail.yahoo.com (SSL enabled, port 465, use authentication)
The top one--- I thought is for regular Yahoo mail and the other is for Yahoo Plus mail?
SO this is not correct there are not 2 different servers? The only way to get it is by signing up through Yahoo Plus? Wow I thought there was a different way.
thanks~

I am getting following error! XML Parsing Error: undefined entity Location: chrome://weave/content/options.xul Line Number 6, Column 3: setting id="weave-account" type="string" title="&account.label;" / --^

I am getting followong error
XML Parsing Error: undefined entity
Location: chrome://weave/content/options.xul
Line Number 6, Column 3: <setting id="weave-account" type="string" title="&account.label;" />
--^

I had this problem - it appeared to be due to having Firefox 4 with the Firefox Sync installed as an add-on. Firefox 4 has sync included so there is no need to have it as an add-on. I went to the add-on manager and removed Firefox Sync and now appears to be working correctly.

Is Verizon unwilling or unable to fix problem with Account Owner(s)

A forum or Google search reveals several customers unhappy with how Verizon treats the account owners... count me as one. I'm sure there are many more customers who were equally unhappy but just accept Verizon's incompetence and complete the unnecessary gymnastics of un-registering accounts and then re-registering with a new username.
PROBLEM:
There are numerous scenarios that can cause a My Verizon account to have the Account Owner be listed with an incorrect telephone number. In my case, I had an account with AT&T and 3 additional numbers associated. As each account expired, I transferred the numbers to Verizon. The first account transferred was my 14yr old son. I registered a My Verizon account for management (my name & my userid) and eventually added the additional numbers, however, the Account Owner's phone number is listed as my son's cell.
Over the past 2 years (since I migrated to Verizon), I've had small problems with account notifications and other information being text to my son's cell. I've called numerous times and customer service says it's corrected, but eventually the problems return. Recently, I upgraded my phone and started using some new services like Backup Assistant and the fact that the Account Owner is associated with an incorrect number has caused even more trouble.
I simply want to keep my existing username for My Verizon and correct the cell phone number associated as the Account Owner. This should be extremely simple.
VERIZON'S SOLUTION:
"We can't do it". "Our systems don't allow us to make this change".
The Customer Service Department (or Lack of Customer Service Department) tells me that since they can't or are unwilling to do the necessary changes, their only solution is to force their customer to do their work. They will un-register the account and I can register again. There is no concern for the preferences of an existing customer (almost 3 years); there is no concern for the inconvenience caused to an existing customer who spends hundreds of dollars each month and thousands of dollars each year (I currently have 2 separate accounts with Verizon, 4 phones on my problem account and 4 phones on another for a total of 8 phones with data plans... do the math); there is no concern that I will now have to use a completely different username one that is no longer uniform with my other accounts; there is no concern that I will have to change any and all services that reference My Verizon. Quite simply... Verizon Wireless shows their Account Owners that they have no concern for us.
PROPER SOLUTION:
I have almost 25 years of Information Technology experience and over 3 years working with Call Centers (similar to Verizon's Customer Service), which explains in part why I find this so frustrating... the fix for this is SIMPLE!!! The real problem is that Verizon simply doesn't care enough to fix it because we are existing customers and not new customers.
Without going into specifics (nor could I since I don't have access to their systems), data for the My Verizon portal is contained within modifiable databases. These relational databases will be tied to other systems and other databases, but a modification of this type would just require that the portal be allowed to make the update to the appropriate field(s) within the appropriate database(s). If direct access is not attainable because of their design, it is still not too difficult to write an additional process to accommodate this change. These types of things are done everyday.
More importantly, even if Verizon was unable or unwilling to make these programming changes... I have no doubt that if Customer Service has an escalation process to their I.T. Department that a programmer with access to the application(s) and/or database(s) could easily make the change directly and almost immediately.
CONCLUSION:
Until now, my experience with Verizon has been mostly positive even to the point of recommending the carrier to friends and family. I've found their coverage area to meet my needs and the data speeds to be more than satisfactory. However, Verizon needs to remember that cellular service has essentially become a commodity and that customer retention is often based on other things than simply providing dial tone. With a monthly cell phone expense that rivals a car payment, I would think that Verizon would be more than willing to accommodate such a simple request to maintain a satisfied customer.
If you too are one of the many customers having issue with modifying the Account Owner, just resolve yourself that it appears Verizon is unwilling to make the simple correction to the My Verizon portal to satisfy our request.

I'm not 100% sure that I follow your reasoning, so please correct me if I misstate your opinions. I've numbered them so it will be easier to identify any mistakes I make.
1. Not allowing a user, customer service representative, or any Verizon representative to change the cell phone number associated with the Account Owner to another cell phone number on the same account is a security risk.
I'm not suggesting that I be allowed to change the name, social security number, or any other pertinent details related to establishing the original account. All the information pertaining to who is responsible for the bill remains the same with the single exception that the current associated cell phone number be changed to another number already listed on the account. In what possible manner is this a security risk? Frankly if the ability was enabled and someone either by mistake or incompetence made such a change the impact would simply be what I'm currently experiencing (inconvenience). Since in this hypothetical situation the ability to change this value is enabled, the "inconvenience" would easily be re-mediated by returning the value to its original state.
Furthermore, if there is some "security risk" that I'm over looking then an organization that is concerned about providing quality customer service would create procedures to accommodate customer requests and meet security requirements. Let's use a bank (with an obvious security vulnerability) and debit cards as an example. If I lose my debit card, I cannot go to my computer and print out a temporary debit card (very user friendly, but not secure). Some banks will allow you to go online and cancel the lost debit card while requesting a new one to be mailed to the address you have on file (user friendly and mostly secure). To solve this same problem at other banks might require you to go into the office and sign a form cancelling the lost debit card and confirming the address to mail you a new one (less user friendly, but highly secure). The Verizon equivalent, is me requesting that I add an existing bank account to my online banking and being told "We can't do it". However, because the bank cares so much about keeping me as a customer... they will delete my account, allow me to create another, possibly losing my historical data, have me change my username that I've been using for years, spend time adding all my online bill payments... all for the pleasure of staying their customer and getting to use their services as they should have been designed.
2. Making a software change that would allow users or CSR's to associate a different cell phone number on the account to the current Account Owner would be difficult and require downtime.
You give some time expounding this thought and I'm unaware of your web, application, and/or database experience... but I will try to address your concerns later. However, let's assume that you are correct and these changes will be difficult ("taking weeks to months"). The purpose of my post was whether Verizon was unwilling or unable to accommodate this customer request. You seem to be agreeing that Verizon is unwilling to make these changes, or at the very least, feel that Verizon has decided that the time and expense involved is of more importance than correcting an issue impacting their customers. I personally find the later equally disheartening as this has been an issue for many customers (you yourself mention experiencing the problem) and has been well documented through previous forum and Internet posts. Even by your estimations, if they had taken previous customer complaints seriously... this would have been fixed by now. Once again it seems the obvious answer is that Verizon may not consider customer service as an important factor as I do.
As far as your technology issues, I agree that more than a web page change would be required. I do take issue with comparing the change of a distributed application (operating system) that must be designed to support enumerable hardware components to the work required to makes changes to a web portal with a back-end in-house database. You could write an entire book detailing the differences between these two scenarios as they have very little in common, but I'll try to keep it focused to your points.
Coding
Coding an Operating System that must run on literally a multitude of hardware configurations and support an unending diversity of applications is an incredible endeavor and really never a finished product. Changes to an OS are constantly being made and the developers must consider hardware and software that they are not intimately familiar and occasionally even deal with 3rd parties to facilitate changes.
The change I'm advocating has a web component which would be replicated throughout their web server topology, however, these are items that Verizon's developers deal with routinely (if not daily). There are a very limited number of 3rd party concerns (a few different browsers, IE, Chrome, Mozilla & a disparate platforms such as PC, tablet, phone). A little research in the benefits of web portals (and cloud computing) verses distributed applications will clearly outline the drastic differences. A simple illustrative question (though maybe not a completely fair analogy) is how many people do you know who can code an operating system and how many people get on GoDaddy and create their own web pages. I'm not trying to insinuate that anyone who knows a little HTML can make the web portal changes, however, this isn't a difficult project for an experienced developer.
The bigger issues and ones that I alluded to in my original post are the changes that would be required to Verizon's back-end databases. The changes that would need to be made mostly likely involve multiple databases and assuming they are using a typical relational database design might require changes to key fields, adding new databases/tables, and exhaustive integrity checks. This isn't something that an average user could sit down and accomplish in an hour, however, these are simply the routine day-to-day duties of any professional database developer.
Again I reiterate... this change simply involves allowing someone (either a user, CSR, or other Verizon agent) to readily change an index record or records that correlates Account Owner to cell phone number. In terms of database management this should be simple.
Debugging & Deployment
The debugging/testing of changes made to an Operating System are amazingly complex for all the aforementioned reasons. The deployment of such changes is even more complex in that you've got to develop the mechanism to push these changes out to the entirety of the user community. I'll address deployment (or as you said dispersal) of this change because it's the easiest... quite simply there isn't one. The benefit of having a centralized web portal like My Verizon is that users come to you, not the other way around, and any change made will immediately be accessible by the user community. There is a deployment aspect in that My Verizon doesn't exist on a single web server, but again this is just the typical topology for a portal of this size and not relevant to our discussion. Debugging/Testing is an important aspect of any change and certainly Verizon has this methodology in place, however, I'll reiterate that this change should not be complex and shouldn't require extensive testing. We've also already discussed the fact that any debugging/testing only has to take place on a limited number of platforms.
Downtime
If adding the ability to change the relationship of the Account Owner to an associated cell phone number requires any downtime... the person responsible for Verizon's Development, Beta, and Production environments should be fired. There is simply no way this is even a possible concern. I've dealt with many companies with far less resources than Verizon and I assure you that changes of this nature would never require down time. I'm sure they have staff in place whose sole responsibility is to work on their continuity plan. This is a non issue.
Other Carriers
You can't possibly know how all carriers operate, though you may have some past experience with other companies. I would contend (and maybe I'm too optimistic) that a company with a focus on customer satisfaction when made aware of complaints and/or limitations in their service would seek to rectify the issue. It's quite possible that whatever other company you are referencing has fixed this issue if indeed it was similar... especially since I've hopefully bolstered my opinion that the resolution is not overly complicated.
Would you mind telling me if you deleted your 2 original comments to my post before I had an opportunity to answer? The reason I ask is that last night another user (jimfitzgerald) had posted a comment and I replied. He later posted a 2nd comment and while writing my response... all the posts were removed (his 2 posts, my reply, and your 2 posts). I'm curious if this was just a user withdrawal (though I really wish my response had remained in the thread), if there was some sort of technical issue with these forums last night, or if my response was deleted for cause by Verizon or other admin. Thanks!

Account type "iCloud" not available on my iCal

I'm trying to sync up my iCal with my iPhone, etc. However, while I can put an event in iCal, it will not show up on my iPhone/iPad, etc. When I go to iCal>Preferences>Accounts>+>Account Type and hit the dropdown menu, the only options I see are "Automatic / CalDAV / Exchange 2007 / MobleMe / Google / Yahoo!" There is no option for "iCloud".
When I try to create a calendar under "MobleMe" using my apple ID, I get the following error message:
The server responded with an error.
Access to account “[email protected]” is not permitted.
The server responded:
“HTTP/1.1 403 Forbidden”
to operation CalDAVAccountRefreshQueueableOperation.
I know I'm using the correct apple ID and password. I'm running iCal 4.0.4. Any idea what's up?

No, I am using a G5 not I g3. I forgot to change it
What computers do you show under System
Preferences...>.Mac>Advanced...The following
computers are being synchronized using this .Mac
account?
***** This may be the problem!!
It only shows this one computer on the above question. On my wife it only shows hers. Is it supposed to show both? If so how do I add them?
Merle,
I do not know why it worked with the Address Book and
not the Calendar. That confuses me too
If so, you may want to ensure that you have Reset
.mac sync from all computers. Make sure that you have
backed up your database (iCal>File>Backup
Database...) As stated in the Reset article, "If you
sync between computers with different versions of Mac
OS X, try to reset the sync data from the computer
with Mac OS X 10.4, if possible." I am using the same systems: 10.4.6
What computers do you show under System
Preferences...>.Mac>Advanced...The following
computers are being synchronized using this .Mac
account? Are they all registered with a recent
synchronized date?
the date on my computer shows a sync today as does my wifes.
;~)
src="http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a381/Ferdsky/Sm
allWings.png"

Account type D is not defined for document type RE - Credit Memo

I tried to key in credit memo of fixed asset at MIRO but prompt out this errors "Account type D is not defined for document type RE". I checked OMBA - account type for vendor is selected. Any advise to resolve this problem?

Hi Sanil,
It is just a debit Vendor and Cerdit Fixed Asset. Is anything wrong here?

Document type should always post to specific account type

Hello experts,
I have 1 question, Depeneding on the Document type definition I can post to different account types (S, K, D , M ,A). Assume I created a doc type ZA and checked all the account types then it allows me post to all the account types.
Here I want the document type ZA to validate one of the line in the document should always be type K (vendor). In short in the combinaton of account types posted to under this document type should always have one specified account type.
All contributions welcome.
Thanks,
KKR

Hi Eli,
I am not sure how to do that in this case, I have worked on validations before and I always worked with 'Constants'. If I write
If Doc type is ZA
then account type should be 'K'
But the problem is it wont allow me to post as the other line will always be different, that means a combination K and other than K.
And we are not sure how many lines going to be there in a GL document.
Do I nee to look at user exits in validations? If yes, please let me know how can I do that.
Thanks,
KKR
Edited by: KK Rao on Sep 24, 2010 11:07 AM

Add more "Account Types" in chart of account

Hi,
would it possible to add more account types to the "Account Type" drop down, and anyone who has an idea on how to do it?
It would of course be possible to catch the FORM_LOAD event for the form and add additional ValidValues, and in a similar way catch the FORM_CLOSE event and manually save the value to the DB, but this would probably cause problems in other modules using the value..?!
TIA
Martin Korsbro

I don't think it will be possible without breaking the data integrity of SBO.
The product has processing built in based on the 3 standard values (BoAccountTypes Enumeration), if you were to provide an alternate value it would probably cause exceptions in standard SBO screens and lead to some difficult issues for support.
It would be better to add a User Defined Field to the Chart of Accounts and specify the list of values you want there.
John.

P & l Account Type Creation

Hi Friends,
I am a beginner in FICO.I am having a problem while creating a GL account.The problem is that whenever I am creating a GL account of particular king, I am getting a message that there is no P & L account type for this particular GL account.Please advice me a solution for this problem.
Regards
Ashish.

Hi
The first thing that you need to understand is that there are 2 areas where all accounts will report to.
They are the profit and loss accounts and the balance sheet accounts.
So create the account in FS00 and in the type description tab, you need to select the BS or PL radio button. So basically all your assets and liabilities will go to balance sheet and the expenses and the incomes will go to the PL acccounts.
So you need to check the PL radio button.
I hope this will help. Pls get back in case the problem persisits.

Cross Company MIRO Transaction - BSEG-TXGRP Not Valued for Account Type "S"

I am working with the ABAP group to create tax reports for audits and sales tax charged by vendor. I am basically wanting a line item report of all purchases along with any tax applied to each line. Therefore, I am, for the most part, using tables BKPF, BSEG, and BSET. For our US transactions, we have one company paying the invoice on behalf of all other US companies. Essentially, every transaction is a cross-company transaction. The problem is I am having a hard time tying BSEG to BSET by line item. For FB60 transactions, I can tie BSEG-TXGRP to BSET-TXGRP; however, for MIRO transactions, BSEG-TXGRP is not valued for Account Type "S" (GL Accounts). Any ideas? I could not find a note to capture this issue. There was a note, but it was with regard to Account Types "D" and "K" I believe, vendor and customer accounts.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Deanna

So,
Did you ever resolve this. I have the EXACT problem right now. Inter-co. MIRO documents only getting TAXGRP popuplated for Original Co. Document (not cross-co. document).
Thanks,
- Tim

MIRO-Account type/account for invoice reference does not match item-F5350

Hi gurus
please help
When I tried to cancel an MIRO invoice, it is giving me the error
Account type/account for invoice reference does not match item". "F5350 "
Please advise.
thanks
MSJ

Hello,
This seems to be a configuration issue or you might be entering the wrong details.
This is a standard transaction. IF you feel there is nothing wrong, then search for OSS notes on http://service.sap.com to see if there is a solution to this problem.
cheers,
sushil joshi

Error - Account type D is not defined for document type WL

I am getting error while doing PGI (Post Goods Issue).
Error - Account type D is not defined for document type WL

As we had the same problem for a document in our system, I was also browsing for the answer. I saw this thread and now we have found the solution, so could not resist sharing, although it is an old posting.
In these cases it can be that a user wants to create a purchase order of the type UB. But if you have stock transport between two companies, you should not use this order type. You have to use order type NB.
If the user creates the PO with NB then probably they will not get the message.

FI_Document Archiving - Account type life not reached (T071)

Hi,
This is related to archiving FI_Documnt. Few of the documents are not able to archive and the reason is Account type life not reached (T071). I have entered same number of retention dayes for account type and document type, that is too for all account type (*) and document type. My understanding is system first checks the header level retention i.e. document type and then moves on to check account level. If retention days are same for doc and account type, when document type retension reached why should I get mess as account type life not reached.
Could someone help me to understand what could be the reason.
Regards,
Shailesh

Hi Gurus
I'm in a project archive, I have a problem with FI_DOCUMNT, and set the days of Life Document / Account which exceeds the limit of days to archive, when I run the archive process sends me an error that life has not been reached, any ideas?
The year archiving is 2006.
Document Life 366
Life Account 366
release 4.7
Regards

No P4040L statement account type is defined in chart of accounts 4040

Hello,
I have maintained account group P & L in SPRO>Financial Accounting>General Ledger accounting>Preparation>Defined Account Group.
When trying to create G/L account FS00 it throws error message
No P4040L statement account type is defined in chart of accounts 4040
Saying "No P&L statement account type is defined in chart of accounts 4040"
Procedure Define a P&L statement account type in chart of accounts 4040
When I have given account group with chart of accounts 4040 why still I am getting this error? Once I deleted entry & added P & L in Chart of accounts 4040.
Experts, Please advise solution.
Thanks

hi,
Step.1 : Create Chart of Accounts - in your case you had created
Step 2: Goto T.Code OB53, it will ask for the Chart of Accounts enter the chart of accounts you had created.
Step 3: Once you entered the transaction, there will be two columns PL Statmt acct type and Account enter x in the first column and leave the account column blank.
Step 4: Try to create the GL account you can able to create.
If you are trying to do the configuration first time, you will face this problem, it is a basic issues when we start learning FICO.
thanks and regards
Praveen.J

Problem in accounting type m

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for