Problem in Actual assessment cycle.

Hi Team,
We are using assessment cycle to distribute the cost from utility cost center to production cost center, after cycle execution we found the cost in debit side of the production cost center with assessment cost element. And also we are using the substitution is that the cost which is coming on the assessment cost element will flow to FICO reconciliation GL. We created 5 sets of assessment cost element groups( depreciation secondary cost element group, Admin OH, Store spares, Salary wages & power & Fuel) which  correspond to five 9 series reconciliation accounts.
The 5 reconciliation GLu2019s are as follows:
1. Depreciation                90102003
2. Administrative overheads     90102004
3. Store spares.                90102005
4. Salary & wages                   90102006
5. Power water & fuel.            90102007.
After assessment cycles when FI team runs the transaction F.01 for the above GLu2019s the cost is appearing. Which is the consolidated cost which is distributed from utility cost centers is there any way to get the primary cost element wise breakup of the above five heads. This is the requirement raised by the FI team kindly advice.
Regards,
Ravi.

Hi Ravi,
have you come up with any solution?
I have found, we can use substitution rules in New GL- CO reconciliation to fix assessment issue. In fact, we have to maintain multiple substitution rules or table to get correct P&L by primary cost element. This is pretty much possible.
My issue is, we are using COPA. COPA dont have distribution option.
Let me know if anyone has better option than substitution. because I don't want to loose my primary cost element information.

Similar Messages

  • Actual assessment cycles does not work

    Hello.
    I have a problem with actual assessment cycles.
    I use KSU5 to run one cycle and when I run it in test mode it says that there is a sender and a receiver and that there are no errors, but when I run it without test mode it says that there are no senders nor receivers and no errors appear
    Which could be the problem?
    Thanks a lot!!

    Hi,
    Try these following things :-
    a. Change the Receiving tracing factor in the header of the cycle from variable to fixed perct.
    b. Check whether GL is assigned in Tcode OK17.
    Rgds,
    SAP Friend

  • Function create actual assessment cycle EC-PCA

    Dear experts!
    Now, I'm getting some issue about create actual assessment cycle EC-PCA. Really, I want to know the function that create actual assessment cycle EC-PCA (t.code 3KE1).
    Help me, Please.
    Best regards, Huy.

    Hi,
    You are mixing things. 9KE0 is used to post PCA documents - nothing to do with assessment cycles. You could use BAPI_PCA_BELEG_SAVEREPLICA function for this. There is no function/BAPI to create assessment cycle (3KE1).
    Regards,
    Eli

  • Executing Actual Assessment Cycle (COPA) TCode KEUB

    I am Executing Actual Assessment Cycle (COPA) TCode KEUB for the month of march in the month of May, In which month will that be reflected (March or May)... Is there any way to reflect that in the month of march (the month for which KEUB is run?

    Hi,
    as far as I know, if you are executing KEUB for march in may its posted in march's period. Try a test run (maybe for only one segment).
    Best regards, Christian

  • Actual Assessment Cycle - Multiple Segments for one Cost Center

    Dear experts,
    I've got one very important (for me) question:
    I want to distribute a cost centers (primary) cost in two ways - at the same time:
       First: as a fixed value to three other cost centers and
       Second: the remaining cost shall be distributed to all cost centers of a cost center group
                    with an statistical key figure.
    Is it possible to distibute the remaining cost after a first distribution??
    If yes, how is the procedure to do so?
    Thank you very much in advance.
    Ralf

    Hi Ralf,
    It's certainly possible; just create two steps, one after another, and you will achieve your goal.
    Regards,
    Eli

  • Number range error in Assessment cycle in CO-PA

    Dear All,
    During performing "Actual Assessment cycle in CO-PA" , system gives the error message
    "An error occurred when the SAP System attempted to determine the document number. No interval was found for number range object RK_BELEG, sub-object 1000".
    When I checked in KEN1 (Document ranges for actual posting) & also checked in
    KANK, it is defined
    Can some one can explain me how to re-solve the same.
    Rgds
    SMK Ganesh

    Hi,
      Please, check transaction KANK, under menu path of SPRO:
    Controlling -> General Controlling -> Organization ->
    Maintain number ranges for controlling documents
    Choose Overview and find the corresponding CO area.
    You will see that there are several business transactions not assigned
    to any number range. One of them should be KSPA Assessment to CO-PA.
    Please, assign this business transaction (and the ones required for other processes) to a number range.
    Then, run again KEU5.
    If the above does not help then check if problem is that you use too many receiver fields in copa cycle.
    The number range object is derived from the co-area and if you are using more than 15 single value receiver fields the system wont consider the settings "behind" the co-area.
    regards
    Waman

  • Runtime Analysis in PA Assessment Cycle

    Dear All,
    I have run an PA Assessment Cycle in with "Flow Trace On" and "Run Time Analysis On".I have a 3 part question
    A) I seek your help in understanding the following and correct my understanding(stated in small brackets) if i am wrong
         1) Before Selection (Start Time of the Cycle)
         2) After Selection (Database Selection)
         3) After Iteration (???)
         4) After Oldkey (???)
         5) After Post (???)
         6) No Of Sender Values in Database (No of Senders in my Cycle and for which Master data exists in Database)         
         7) No Of Receiver Values in Database ( No of Unique Combination of Receivers in the Database CE4XXXX table)
         8) No Of Allocating Senders (Out of the Senders stated in Point 6, No of Senders that are actually sending Values)
         9) No Of Allocating Senders (Out of the Senders stated in Point 7, No of Receivers that are actually receiving Values)
        10) No Of Line Items(???)
    B) When i run the same Cycle in Test Run and Update run there is a huge difference in time and the Values for the items 6~10 points also differ( i am the only one working on the test system and there is no other data posted posted apart from this) so what is the reason for difference.
    C) If i am running on a HANA COPA Accelerator, will the change in the receivers (stated below) have an impact on the read time (logically yes, but need some expert opinion also)
         1) No of Characteristics (Ex: Unitil now Profit Center alone, from now on PCTR, Product, Div, Dis Chl)
         2) No of Characteristics Values (Ex: Unitill Now PRTCR Values are A,B and C From now on it will be A~Z)
    Request your valuable inputs. And my apologies for a very long question.
    Thanks & Regards
    Surya

    Hi Gaurav,
    Thanks for your comment. But that is not compliant to my question. I didn't do any configuration in KEPA and assign any characteristics groups for assessment cycle. However I really don't know why only one characteristics(Product:ARTNR) is suppressed and so I cannot input any value into that characteristics for actual assessment cycle.
    I will appreciate your kindly help.
    Best regards,
    Ivan

  • How to analyse the Receiver Tracing Factor in COPA Assessment cycle -KEU5

    Hi
    While executing the COPA Assessment cycle,we will get receiver tracing factor.My client wants to know how we got that.How can i analyse that Receiver tracing factor?Kindly advice me...
    How can I recalculate the tracing factor for assesstment?
    For example, Actual Assessment Cycle RS_A01 under Segment ITCMFG2AD uses Variable Portions Rule for Receiver tracing Factor with Value Field of 62 Sales.
    The intent of this assessment was to be allocated based upon sales dollar values however when I review the test calculation, it appears the tracing factor is in billions of dollars when our monthly sales are in the million of dollars range.
    Supriya

    Hi,
    If Receier Tracing Factor Rule is Variable Portion, then please also check the Receiver Weighting factor (the last tab in the assessment cycle, it normally is 100 for the receivers.
    Secondly also check if there is different currency setting in CO Area & the Operating Concern which translates into different figures.
    Hope this works.
    Regards
    Saket

  • Any BAPI or FM for Assessment cycle create 3KE1 tcode

    Hi,
    Any BAPI or Function module to create actual assessment cycle 3KE1 tcode.
    i am doing BDC for that currently. Anybody done this please send the coding for this.
    thanks
    Muthappan

    Hi Muthappan,
    Could you please send me some sample code you used to create Assessment Cycle / Distribution Cycle using the function module.
    Many Thanks in advance
    Soumen

  • COPA Assessment Cycle - Segment Wise

    Hello Friends,
    Good Day!
    I have created COPA Actual Assessment Cycle by T-Code KEU1. I have created around 5 Segments in that cycle. I want to execute the Assessment Cycle, but Segment Wise. I am trying to execute KEU5 and execute the Cycle. The assessment was properly as desired but for all Segment at once.
    But if I want to execute this Cycle Segment Wise, is there any possible way to do that?
    Many Thanks,
    Pritesh Lodha

    Dear Lodha,
    Please try in the following manner which may suits your requirement:
    Lock indicator available in Assessment cycles segment wise.
    If you have many segments and want to run for few segments, you can use the lock indicator in assessment cycle T Code: KSU2
    After locking the required segments you can run the assessment cycle using KEU5 by specifying the cycle name.
    Cycle will consider the active segments only.
    Regards,
    Pavan Kumar Arvapally

  • Actual Assessment and distribution cycles

    Hi Guys:
                       I have gone through planning assessment cycles , their execution and activity rate calculation. Now i want to do actual cycles. I am confused about the starting point of actual cycles. I understand that service cost centers are the one which need to be apportioned to the receiving cost center. Service cost centers like Electricity have posting in them through FI and their accumulated cost needs to be apportioned to production cost center through actual run.For actual cycles to be executed what should be the starting point. Like in planning i started from KP06,did KSU7 and KSUB, then moved to KP26,did KSS4 and finally KSPI. This planned activity rate is supposed to be used in computing actual activity cost when actual quantities are confirmed from PP. Please guide me through the process.
    Br
    Moderator: Please, search before posting

    Hi:
           Thanks for reply. I did KSU1 and KSU5 , now at the time of test run KSS2, it showed me some warning messages as shown under
    No target costs in target cost version 0 - missing plan for ATY 1000/1301002/FOH
    No target costs in target cost version 0 - missing plan for ATY 1000/1301002/LABOR
    No target costs in target cost version 0 - missing plan for ATY 1000/1301002/VOH
    Cost center CTR 1000/1301002, cost element ZSNPL: Tracing factor for splitting is zero
    Cost center CTR 1000/1301002, cost element ZAINS: Tracing factor for splitting is zero
    Cost center CTR 1000/1301002, cost element ZMISC: Tracing factor for splitting is zero
    No target costs in target cost version 0 - missing plan for ATY 1000/1303004/FOH
    No target costs in target cost version 0 - missing plan for ATY 1000/1303004/LABOR
    No target costs in target cost version 0 - missing plan for ATY 1000/1303004/VOH
    Cost center CTR 1000/1303004, cost element ZSNPL: Tracing factor for splitting is zero
    Br

  • Assessment Cycle problem (KSU5)

    Hi experts!!!
    I am trying to do an assessment cycle, but somehow not all the cost are being taken.
    Only the real amounts are being taken. I need also to treat the real stadistic values.
    Anyone can give me some advise?
    Thanks in advance for your reply.

    Hi Alejandro Garcia,
    At the time of Allocation of costs (Distribution/Assessment etc), only real postings will be considered in the Sender object. Statistical postings are only for information purpose.
    Pls try to understand the reason with the following example...
    At the time of posting of an expense in FI, we will be able to select one Real object and two statistical Object. So, If you have selected Internal Order (which is real object) and one Cost Center, then, real posting will happen to Internal Order and Statistical posting to Cost Center.
    But, if you want this statistical posting also to be considered at the time of assessment of cost from that cost center, then it would be duplication of the same cost which will finally reach Product.
    I hope it is clear, please revert back for further explanation...
    Srikanth Munnaluri

  • COPA Assessment Cycle using KEU5 for multiple controlling areas

    Hello All,
    There is an organization with operations in several countries. There is a separate controlling area for each country. There is one controlling area, for instance, for Germany and another for Netherlands.
    A problem is encountered while executing transaction KEU5 for multiple controlling areas in parallel. For instance, when one user from Germany executes KEU5 for an assessment cycle for Germany controlling area and at the same time another user from Netherlands tries to execute KEU5 for a cycle for NL controlling area, the user from Netherlands encounters an error message u201C'Cycle XXXX 01.02.2008 cannot be started because run group 0000 is locked'.
    Apparently SAP allows assessment cycles for exactly one controlling area to be executed together. This poses a problem since the organization plans to implement SAP in several other countries (There will be one separate controlling area for each country as per the organization structure adopted by the company).
    Any ideas, views or suggestions on the aforesaid issue would be highly appreciated.
    Regards,
    Soumya

    Hi Soumya,
    Did you find any text in SAP Documentation saying that "SAP does not allow cycles belonging to different controlling areas to be executed at the same time"...?
    Pls find the following text from SAP Help...
    Parallel Processing of Cycles of an Allocation Type
    Use
    Parallel processing of cycles results in considerable time savings. To process cycles of one allocation type in parallel, they must be assigned to different cycle run groups.
    You define the cycle run groups in the cycle header data. You also assign cycles to the cycle run groups in the header data.
    To process the cycles of a cycle run group in parallel, start the cycles one after the other, if required, in different sessions.
    You are carrying out a cross-company code cost accounting and want to perform the actual assessment in the individual company codes in parallel. Create a cycle run group for each company code and assign the appropriate cycles to these groups. You can then carry out the actual assessment in the individual company codes in parallel.
    When you execute a cycle, you can start a consistency check. The system checks whether you are allowed to execute the selected cycles in parallel.
    Though I didn't come across such requirement, I feel, my earlier suggestion will work out...
    Srikanth Munnaluri

  • Assessment Cycle in Profit Center

    Hi,
    Need urgent help.
    I'm running an Assessment Cycle for Profit Center but every time system does not select any sender or receiver.
    Error message:
    Cycle 8ATEST1, start date 20070401, does not include any senders.
    Message no. GA749
    Diagnosis
    No senders were found for cycle 8ATEST1, starting date 20070401.
    System Response
    It is no longer possible to create receivers and assign senders for the segment.
    Procedure
    Check the definition of the cycle in the maintenance transaction for EC-PCA: Actual Assessment. No valid sender cost centers could be found to match your selection.
    If you use the sender rules "Posted amounts" or "Posted quantities", check whether records exist in the database for the criteria you entered (cost element, version...)
    During indirect activity allocation with the sender rule "posted quantities", you should also note that only the difference between the planned/posted activity allocation and the scheduled activity quantity is allocated. If you entered activity types as sender, you should at this point also check the activity type category. For those quantities posted with an activity type of category 1 (manual entry, manual allocation) no indirect activity allocation is possible.
    1. If this is an allocation in the FI/FI-SL area, the problem could also be due to the inheritance logic for FI-SL totals tables, whose "Inheritance of sender based on the receiver" indicator is activated in the "Partner object update" view (T811U-INHERSRC). These are tables that were installed before Release 4.6A.
    Use transaction GCA8 to check this, and see the section on:
    Inheritance Logic for Allocations
    then correct the affected cycle, if required.
    Pls help urgently.
    Regards,
    Vikas Malhotra

    Hello ,
    Did you double checked if any postings occurred to the respective profit centers in the cycle for that particular period you are executing??
    Thanks,
    Sai.

  • CCA - Actual assessment (KSU5) / allocation not reflected in GLFUNCT table

    Hi there,
    One of my client uses functional area for reporting.  Functional area is derived using cost ctr category while posting.  When reports are generated, actual assessment / allocation does not reflect in the functional area report.
    The amounts shown are same as the original posting.  Is there any report which can show functional area values after the assessment  (KSU5) / allocation (KSV5)?
    I created a report using report painter using the library 0F (GLFUNCT), but the value is before KSU5 / KSV5.  Any way to get the amount after KSU5 / KSV5?
    Thanks
    RG

    Hi,
    Functional areas are being  deployed for the purpose of Cost of sales accounting in FI area only. The distribution and assessment cycles which are being undertaken in Controlling will not be available in Finance tables. If you need functional area wise report in Controlling, you can run the standard report on the basis of group of cost centers which are assigned to a particular Functional area.
    Trust this helps much!
    Cheers!

Maybe you are looking for

  • Smartview 11.1.2.1 In Excel accessing Issue

    Hi , In my Essbase server smartview worked perfectly upto 3 months. Afterwards i am unable to see "Hyperion Smartview" ribbon under Excel office menu tabs. Reinstalled Ms office 2007 and Smarview eventhough i did not get SV Ribbon and features in exc

  • Error when downloading itunes purchases

    When I go to download from the iTunes store the downloading bar keeps restarting over and over again and then I get this message. Anyone what is going on? I tried several times to redownload and no sucess.

  • HT2486 How do I see what groups a contact is in?

    In my address book...how do I see all the groups a contact is in?

  • Reading Files using Forte ?

    I was writting a little Java program to read a text file. I created a text file in Forte and wrote some code to open it and read it and I received a file not found exception. Could someone post some sample code to open and read a file using readline(

  • Preditable sequence of Saving when 3 or more tables are involved.

    hi Kodo gurus. I have a problem when the relationships span more than 3 tables. Scenario is like this, there is Table A, B and C. B has foreign key relationship with A. C has foreign key relationship with B. 3 out of 5 times, I get intregrity constri