Problem in avilability check in APO while delivery

Hello APO guru,
we have created new material and we also have GATP setup .
i have created two orders with different order type.
One is normal order and one is free of charge order.
In order avilability check done correctly.
But when we try to deliver normal order its allowing to create delivery but when we try to create delivery for free of charge order its not allowing us to go in to delivery.
Its saying 0 qty available.
But QTY is there.
when we try to debug we have found when its going in avilability of APO its comming with 0 qty.
during debuging we have found that when in apo its going into SAPATP_PAC_CHECK its not comming with QTY but in case of normal order its comming with confirmed qty.
in both the case material is same customer is same.Just order type is different,item category diff.
Could you please let me know where should i check in GATP for this.

Hi Nisha,
As you have mentioned that you are using different sales order type & item category, please chck whether for the sales document type where you are facing the prbolem, under item category (in spro, SAP Customizing Implementation Guide , Sales and Distribution , Sales , Sales Documents , Sales Document Item , Assign Item Categories) item usage APO1 & APO2 has been assigned or not.
Many a times due to item usage not maintained correctly can give such problem.
Regards,
Chetana

Similar Messages

I am having problems with my outlook 2011. While i am able to check and SEND email on all my other devices ( Ipad, iphone, Macbook), I am unable to do so with my iMac. This problem started suddenly and the error message i get is error 5.7.8. Please Help

I am having problems with my outlook 2011. While i am able to check and SEND email on all my other devices ( Ipad, iphone, Macbook), I am unablesend any email with my iMac ( i can recieve email) . This problem started suddenly and the error message i get is error 5.7.8. I have read the threads on line and went into settings, even created a new profile, nothing helps...Please advice..is this something to do with my keychain Access?

As Outlook is not an Apple product, you will find more helpers familiar with Outlook here:
Office for Mac forums

ATP check for delivery in ECC & Sales order ATP check in APO

Hi All,
Can we do an ATP check for delivery in ECC , but for the same set of Materials- Plant combination , the ATP check when a SO is created should happen in APO .
We do not want to remove the Business event 'B' which is meant for delivery in APO . For some materials we need APO ATP check to happen for delivery & for some it should be in ECC & for SO the ATP check should happen in APO .
Even if we do not have check instructions pertaining to Business event 'B' & a particular check mode (for the materials where the ATP check for delivery should happen in ECC & SO check to happen in APO) , when we are doing an ATP check for delivery , it is still pointing to APO ATP check rather than ECC check .
Any pointers for this is highly appreciated.
Regards
Surendra

Hi Surendra,
For SO, business event is A and for delivery it's B. When integrated with ECC, the check rule in ECC points as biz event in APO.
You can control ATP check by customized settings for check rule in ECC.
Also, by setting requirement class and requirement type in ECC, you control check mode in APO. So, even if you dont define for check mode in APO, the system might refer from ECC for the ATP check settings. Look into your ECC customization for how requirement class is derived and settings for requirement type. (based on MRP type, strategy grp and Item cat).
I'm not sure how you can control ATP to happen for some sales orders/deleveries in ECC and for some in APO, since check mode is mentioned in material master.
However, there are ATP BADIs (business add-ins) available in both ECC and APO, whch can serve your purpose.
Regards,
Bipin

Problem with ATP check in release of process order

Hi gurus,
I have next problem in automatic release of process order:
No checking group is maintained for product 000000000791104015, plant VFMX in matl master.
Situation:
I've some materials without MRP views in material master data but apparently this doesn't affect to release order. In this case, this material hasn't this views and it's impossible to release the order. I'm supposing the problem is not related with the fill up of this views or the field in material master data, because for other materials with the same situation the release is running.
Anybody has any idea?
Thanks a lot,
Regards

Dear ,
You are facing this error because :
- you have activated avaialbility check, but checkingb group is not maintained in material master of the component
- if maintained in material master, in configuraion checking group and checking rule combination is not maintained
- if above both are maintained then in the checking control for the order type is maintained, but in the control you maintained the setting that - release not possible if no availability, hence change it to user control option.
*So Goto MM02- material master -MRP3 view -Maintain the Availability check field as 01/02 as applicable for components in the production *
For more clarification , you can investigate the below : For production order avilablity check and release u have should following settings.
1. Define checking Group - SPRO
2. Define checking Rule- SPRO.
3. Define scope of check - OPJJ - Scope of the avilabilty check is defined for the Combination of Checking group and Checking rule. Check contol is defined for each comination of checking group and checking rule.
4.Define Chek control -OPJK : Checking rule is linked to Ordertype/Plant combination.
while releasing the production order system will do avilability check as per the settings In OPJK for ordertype/plant combination.
Hope this is clear to you
Regards
JH
Edited by: Jiaul Haque on Jun 20, 2010 9:20 AM

Issues with Analysis Authorization checks in APO

Hi Friends,
I am facing an issue with Analysis authorization checks in APO.
We have setup user access based on Management Entity (Analysis authorization - AGMMGTENT and 0TCAACTVT) and core APO authorizations (based on the work profile - e.g: Demand Planner).
Scenario: Consider User A has access to India and Australia Management Entities with 0TCAACTVT - *
This user also has display access to all management Entities (AGMMGTENT - * and 0TCAACTVT - 03). This scenario works very well in Quality where the RSECADMIN trace shows check on both Characteristics. However in Production the RSECADMIN trace shows up only against AGMMGTENT (*) and by default takes 0TCAACTVT as (*).
In Quality the Characteristics that get checked are as below : and it works as expected. Display access for Management Entities that are supposed to be displayed only and change access to only the Management Entities that it should.
However the Trace for Production shows the following : As a result it is allowing the user to change access to all management Entities. Which is not desirable..
Resultant trace results are as below: This should not happen..
I have compared all Analysis Authorizations and it is same across both Instances. The Demand planner access is consistent too..
Will it be possible for you to advise on what could I be missing.

Hi All,
If it helps, in Quality: the Authorization checks are listed as: Subselection (Technical SUBNR) 1
while in Production it checks Subselection (Technical SUBNR) 1 in one place, however where it fails - the check happens as Subselection (Technical SUBNR) 0.
Is there a way we can change this to SUBNR 1. Is there any table entry that I can look at to check if the Authorization check is functioning incorrectly..
Please advise.. Thanks..
Regards,
Prakash

FIFO batch determination while delivery in SD

Hi Experts
I did tried to search FIFO batch determination while delivery in SD, but could not find any solution. Please suggest.
1. Strategy type -SD01
2. Batch search Procedure - SD0001
3. Allocated SD Search procedure to the sales area + Sales doc. Type
4. Activated automatic batch determination in SD.
5. Class - CLASS_FIFO is created with Char- LOBM_LWEDT
6. Sort rule - SORT_FIFO and assigned Char - LOBM_LWEDT
7. Create material and assiged Class - CLASS_FIFO and Batch management is activated
8. Maintained condition record VCH1 in keycombination - Material.
After all above configuration, I am able to do the automatic batch determiation. The suggest where I am wrong.
The same configuration I have done for FEFO and its working.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Kaushal Sharma.

I have resolved the problem
Happy to note you have resolved on your own but at the same time, your above comments are not going to help anybody who face similar issue. Please make it as a practice to update the forum properly as to how you resolved
G. Lakshmipathi

Problem with availability check due to credit block

Dear Experts,
I am facing a problem with availability check for a sales order which is blocked against credit check
Like, i have a open sales order with mulitiple line items around 10 line items, out of which all the 10 line items have unrestricted stock and got confirmed when availability check has been performed , but we could able to proceed through delivery and billing only for 9 line items. Hence there is 1 line item in the sales order which didn't get delivered. But when we tried to do the availability check the system is confirming the quantity with credit block. But after the sales order has been released thru VKM3 from credit block again the schedule lines are showing confirmed quantiy as "0" .
Credit message observed : " Credit check (maximum percentage for open exceeded)".
An earlier response would be of greater help extension to me , and i shall be greatly obliged to you all.
Thanks & Regards
Krishna.k

Hi,
once confirm actual stock is there for that line item if yes then may b stock blocked by Credit block.Release the stock reserved by credit blocked sales order through back order processing.
Tcode: V_RA
Select sale order want to change the confirmed qty. SAVE.
and again come to VA02 and run availablity chek.
Regards,
anand

Problem in Set Check for Duplicate Invoices

Hi,
I have did all the required setting s for check duplicate invoice , but when i do miro , its not giving any error or warning msge.. i did all the config as per blw link..
FYI- in migo, i have entered the 3434 as a invoice ref # in delveriy note column and while doing miro , i have entered 3434 in ref column and give the 3434 as a dlvery note # in item tab .. but its not giving any error?
Pls guide, where the mistake has gone wrongly??
Problem in Set Check for Duplicate Invoices
Edited by: UJ on May 15, 2009 1:45 PM

Hello,
Hope you have done all the required configurations for the checking of double invoice and ticked the vendor for the double invoice checking in vendor master record.
You have to understand the way the system does the double invoice check.
As per the configuration, if the system identifies an invoice for a vendor whose double invoice check is activated, at the time of MIRO, system will update a separate table.
So system will check for the double invoice entry among the invoices entered after making the tick in the vendor master.
i meant to say that, if you are introducing this double invoice check in between the transactions, the check will be valid only for the invoices entered after the activation of double invoice check.
Regards

Error while delivery creation

hi,
i am getting an error while delivery creation for qty 2.The error is "Only 0 EA of material xxxx available".
The schedule line cat in this case is cp and avalibility check is carried out and confirmed qty is given on some date ahead.
User then runs the MRP and PR is created .
Then the user creates a PO but not with ref to the PR created from above,instead the user creates a SO assigned PO and then creates GR which is SO assigned.
Now when the user is trying to create delivery the erroe is "Only 0 EA of material xxxx available".
Pl tell me why am i getting this error inspite of having the qty against the SO?
Is it because a PR is generated from the MRP run for tht order and we have no GR agaist tht PR?Where do u i check this setting

Hi,
In SAP there is no stock available for that material. That is the reason it is showing that message..
Please check MMBE t.code stock overview for that material. I think sales order scheduleline date is showing some other date.becuase today there is no stock so u will be not able to create any delvery. So please create delivery only on confirmed schdulines date....
Other wise do stock posting and then do availability check then try to create delivery...
Regards
sankar
Edited by: sankar sankar on Jul 1, 2008 1:10 PM

There's an error while delivery note creation for STO order

There's an error while delivery note creation for STO order even stock available in unrestricted stock
Edited by: sharma aman on Nov 8, 2011 9:00 AM

Dear Sharma Aman,
Check whether the following link helps you.
Mesaage : while creation of delivery : An item with no delivery quantity .)
Please search in google with the error message and definitely you will get some older posts in SDN which is solved.
In that case , you need not wait for the solution as it is already available.
If the solution provided do not suit you, then post it in SDN so that it will be a learning for others.
Try to search in the forum or in google before posting further queries
Thanks & Regards,
Hegal K Charles

I have an ipad3(wifi cellular). Now i want to upgrade my iOS5.1 to ios 7. But download speed in our country is too slow(100kbps). It can be disconnected anytime. Is there any problem if net connection get disconnected while upgrading ios? Please ans me.

I have an ipad3(wifi +cellular). Now i want to upgrade my iOS5.1 to ios 7. But download speed in our country is too slow(100kbps). It can be disconnected anytime. Is there any problem if net connection get disconnected while upgrading ios? Please ans me.

haha, so now i'm thinking. I'm learning the terminal as fast as i can but there are several lines of codes and commands in there that throws up red flags to me that i don't fully understand. It just looks fishy too me. It would be highly appreciated if someone could just check this out just to tell me that i don't need to worry about it. Or point me in the right direction. I just feel un easy about this. ha.

How does Avilability check and TOR takes place in SD

How does Avilability check and TOR takes place in SD? if you have any Tax configuration notes please send it to my mail ID?
[email protected]
Gopal

ATP
Types of Availability Check in Sales and Distribution
Processing
There are three types of availability check:
_ Check on the basis of the ATP quantities
_ Check against product allocation
_ Check against planning
The following SD-specific control features need to be maintained in Customizing:
_ Checking group
The checking group controls whether the system is to create individual or collective
requirements in sales and shipping processing. In addition, a material block for the
availability check with transfer of requirements can be set here. The checking group can
also be used to deactivate the availability check. This option was created especially for
the assembly order so that when the bill of material is exploded in the assembly order,
the individual components, if necessary, can be classified as non-critical parts as far as
procurement is concerned.
The checking group specifies in combination with the checking rule the scope of the
availability check. It is proposed in the material master record on the basis of the material
type and the plant, and copied into the sales and distribution documents.
_ Checking Rule
You use the checking rule to control the scope of the availability check for each
transaction in sales and distribution. You also specify whether the check should be
carried out including or excluding replenishment lead time. The individual checking rules
define by transaction, which stock and inward and outward movement of goods should
be taken into account for the availability check.
_ Schedule line category
You can control with the schedule line category whether an availability check and
transfer of requirements should be carried out in the sales documents. The possible
settings for this at schedule line level are dependent on the settings in the requirements
class which is determined from the requirements type of the material.
_ Delivery item category
The delivery item category can be used to control whether an availability check takes
place in deliveries.
Requirements type
The various requirements are identified by their requirements type. The requirements
type refers to the requirements class and its control features.
_ Requirements Class
The requirements class contains all control features for planning such as relevance for
planning, requirements planning strategy and requirements consumption strategy. In
addition, it is specified at a global level whether an availability check is to take place for
the material in the sales and distribution documents on the basis of the ATP quantity
(ATP = available to promise) and whether requirements are to be passed on. A finer
degree of control can be obtained for sales documents using the schedule line category.
Replenishment lead time is only included in the check performed on the basis of the
ATP quantity.
Prerequisites
An availability check can only be carried out if the following prerequisites have been fulfilled:
_ The control elements described above for the availability check must be maintained in
Customizing for Sales and the relevant assignments made to the sales transactions
_ The availability check must be switched on at requirements class level and - for the
availability check in the sales documents - at schedule line category level
A requirements type must exist by which the requirements class can be found
_ A plant must be defined. It can either be proposed from the customer or material master
record or can be entered manually in the document.
_ A checking group must be defined in the material master record on the Sales/plant data
screen in the Availability check field
Configuring entries of the Availability Check
IMGSDBasic fncsAvailability check and TORAvailability checkAvailability check with ATP logic or against planningDefine checking groups
You can use SAP std checking groups of 01 for summarized reqts or 02 for daily reqts or u can create ur own.
The columns total sales and total deliveries are selection options whereby u can configure a checking rule to sum up reqts to post to MRP either individually or by day or week.
Column 5, Block qty; set this block if u want several users to be able to process the material simultaneously in different transactions without blocking each other. The No Check indicator is used when u want a material to not be relevant for an ATP check.
Defining a material block for other users. The Block checkbox is an indicator that enables u to block the particular material from being checked for availability if it is already being checked at the same time by another user.
Defining the default value for checking groups. However should no entry exist for the checking group in the material master record, one can set a default value per material type and plant.
Controlling the availability check. In this section, u tell the system what stock on hand and what inward and outward movements of stock it must take into account when performing the availability check. These settings are based on the checking group that is assigned to the material master record and the checking rule that is predefined and assigned to the sd transaction. The carry out control for the availability check must be maintained for both the sales order and delivery.
TOR
IMG  SD  Basic fncs  Availability check and TOR  TOR
A line item in the sales order creates a schedule line. The schedule lines in the sales order transfer the requirements through to MRP. You can select the docs on which you want the TOR to happen. For ex, not for quotations.
The TOR aims to ensure the ordered materials are available for the requested delivery date. The TOR can be set for individual or for collective requirements (materials mastersales/plant view).
The TOR is dependent on the following data:
The reqts type, reqts class, checking group and schedule line category.
The reqts type and class are determined in the strategy group (material masterMRP3)
For TOR to be carried out, a few criteria need to be met:
Plant assigned to line item level, schedule line category should be switched on at TOR, TOR must be switched on at the reqts class level, checking group must be defined and allocated to the material master record (sales/plant view in the availability check field)
The reqts class is the controlling factor for the availability check and the TOR for all sd types.
Configuring the TOR:
1) Use std 041 reqts class or copy and rename it. Use the indicators to select if this reqts class must carry out an availability check and/or a TOR.
2) Define the reqts types. A reqts type is allocated to a single reqts class and not vice versa. It is based on the item category and the MRP type of the material.
3) Assign the rqts type to the relevant item category in the sales order and the MRP type found on the material master record.
You can select an alternative search strategy where u assign the reqts type to item category and MRP type. Can select source as 0, 1 or 2. (1 = Item type and MRP type strategy).
4) The TOR and Availability check can be selected/de-selected at the schedule line category level.
5) Block qty confirmation in delivery blocks. This is used to block the reservation of the TOR from MRP.
6) Maintain requirements for TOR. Requirements can be used to determine that the TOR to MRP is not carried out unless a number of conditions are met.
Availability Overview = CO09  order qty, sd doc no, item no, requirements class.
Stock requirements list = MD04  sd no or dly no, line item, schedule line placing the demand
Stock overview = MMBE  total stock per company, then plant followed by storage location, and finally a breakdown per batch
this is the customising as weel as the knowledge part.
PLease award pints if helpful
thanks

Availabilty check rule during STO Delivery

Hi guys,
I have one requirement. As per our business process, all materials have to be posted in QI stock, so setting in Purchasing view has already been done. Now when we are creating STO DO by TA - VL10B, it gives error while creating DO when U stock is zero.
We have checked settings in availability check rule , TA - OMJJ for our availability check and checking rule 'B' for Delivery Here the check box "include Q stock" is deactivated. We don't want to activate it as it will affect SD processes.
We dont want to use transfer posting for QI stock to U.
Can you guys please give me some other alternative to archive this??

To assign Delivery type to checking rule :
Goto SPRO->Materials AMnagement-> Purchasing->Purchase Order->Se Up stock transport Order-> Asssign Delivery type and checking Rule.
Here you can assign your required Checking rule to the delivery type .
To change the behaviour of the message : Note the message Number from the transaction and search for it in
Purchasing->Environment Data-> Define Attributes of sstem messages .
Here you can change from E(Error) to W(Warning) mesage.
Raviraj

Sir i am using datasocket read ,i am communicating with java but my problem is that bcz im using while loop to see if value has changed my labview consumes all the processors time ,sir i want a event like thing so that while loop is not in continuous loop

sir i have given lot of effort but i am not able to solve my problem either with notifiers or with occurence fn,probably i do not know how to use these synchronisation tools.

sir i am using datasocket read ,i am communicating with java but my problem is that bcz im using while loop to see if value has changed my labview consumes all the processors time ,sir i want a event like thing so that while loop is not in continuous loopHi Sam,
I want to pass along a couple of tips that will get you more and better response on this list.
1) There is an un-written rule that says more "stars" is better than just one star. Giving a one star rating will probably eliminate that responder from individuals that are willing to anser your question.
2) If someone gives you an answer that meets your needs, reply to that answer and say that it worked.
3) If someone suggests that you look at an example, DO IT! LV comes with a wonderful set of examples that demonstate almost all of the core functionality of LV. Familiarity with all of the LV examples will get you through about 80% of the Certified LabVIEW Developer exam.
4) If you have a question first search the examples for something tha
t may help you. If you can not find an example that is exactly what you want, find one that is close and post a question along the lines of "I want to do something similar to example X, how can I modify it to do Y".
5) Some of the greatest LabVIEW minds offer there services and advice for free on this exchange. If you treat them good, they can get you through almost every challenge that can be encountered in LV.
6) If English is not your native language, post your question in the language you favor. There is probably someone around that can help. "We're big, we're bad, we're international!"
Trying to help,
Welcome to the forum!
Ben
Ben Rayner
I am currently active on.. MainStream Preppers
Rayner's Ridge is under construction

Check for Duplication of Delivery Note in MIGO

Hi Gurus,
We are working on ECC 6.0. My client's requirement is that Delivery Note field in MIGO -> General tab should be mandetory, that we have done.
Now they want system to check that the same Delivery Note No. should not be accepted by system for same vendor and system should give a message as we get message in Excise Invoice Tab ( if we enter same excise invoice no twice for same vendor) .
Is there vany user exit / badi or any other way to do this ?
Your kind guidance is highly apprciated.
Thanks in advance.
Vikas

MBCF0002
this can be the user exit but u can check with the abap
and ask him to code for u to check delivery number per vendor
But if u put this condition in miog and check MKPF and MSEG table then ur system performance will go down in long run as this table are big sap tables
so u can think of creating a ztable so that in user exit u can code so that vendor delivery number and year will be stored after saving the migo
and in other user exit which will triger first than this will check in this ztable
this will increase the performance
Reward if useful

Problem in avilability check in APO while delivery

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for