Problem in excise case

dear cons pl. solve this. i am facing problem in J2I8 - capital goods transfer of credit. there is not showing 1% Secondary Higher Education Cess.There is no field available here. please look in to the matter urgently.

have you maintained the condition record and given this percentage?

Similar Messages

Problems with use cases in JDeveloper 11.1.1.1.0

Use cases made with JDeveloper 11.1.1.0.2 can not be used and edited in JDeveloper 11.1.1.1.0.
Same problems with Use Case Diagrams.
And it seems to be impossible to create new use cases in JDeveloper 11.1.1.1.0.
What are the differences between 11.1.1.0.2 and 11.1.1.1.0 if you look at use cases??

In JDeveloper 11.1.1.0.2 each use case has one file with the folllowing name: *.xhtml_usc.
In JDeveloper 11.1.1.1.0 each use case has two files with a names like *.xhtml_usc and *.uml_usc (after standard migration with JDeveloper). I can still edit the *.xhtml_usc files, but I have no idea what to do with the *.uml_usc files. I can only open a Property-editor, but the properties I see have no relation with the text I used in my original use cases . New use cases only have a *.uml_usc file and a Property-editor. In javadoc the new use case does not appear.
My question is: why do I have two different use case files in JDeveloper 11.1.1.0 and how can I use the Property editor??

PROBLEM IN EXCISE

DEAR CONS
   i AM SENDING THE CASE DETAILS. PL. SOLVE IT.first time i used PLA transaction in SAP.Amount paid in PLA through TR-6 Challan against S & H Education Cess for Rs.544720/-.accounting document no is 4300014354 after post the TR -6 through J1IH.when i am going to utilise the BED & Ed cess amount through J2IUN, there is not showing PLA line.please look in to the matter urgently& give idea whether there is a configuration problem or any other problem.

Hi,
    Here We are not using TAXINN here we r using TAXINJ.
    At the time of doing GR itself i have posted the excise invoice.
    That time Modvat clearing acc has credited.
    At the time of doing MIRO it has to debit.
    But after MIRO the modvat clearing acc is not generating only in the case of PO without material master record.
    But for PO with MMR it is ok.
    Thatswhy i am not getting where to do the settings.
Regards
Sunil

EXCISABLE CASE

DEAR CONS
I am facing problem i.e-In case of Purchase orders with excisable tax code,the system is allowing to do invoice verification even if RG 23 Part 2 has not been updated.The system is automatically reversing the GR/IR Clearing account even if J1IEX has not been done.Earlier this check was there,but now it is not working
How can I solve this issue.
nirupama

There is an exit available for restricting this. Pls. check in sap support portal.
Regards
Rajesh

Hello all i am facing problem in manufacturing case

hii experts
well i am implementing SAP in manufacturing company .i am stuck in one case when one item which is originally produce by
one of the manufacture company and that company sale that item to dealer with cenvat value (because item is excisable ),and my company purchase that item from dealer .and the cost of item include Cenvat in there basic price and dealer charge that item with VAT only .so my company claim Cenvat with original value which was set by first manufacture company .so what shoud i do now ? how would i make PO which include right cenvat and vat also ?
please help me
thanx in advance

Hi Sahil.....
I think you are going in a different direction from what experts are trying to suggest you.
Have you tried below?
1. if (AssessableValue > 0)
{ BED_BaseAmt = AssessableValue*Qty }
else
{ BED_BaseAmt = Total }
BED_TaxAmt=BED_BaseAmt*BED_Rate
For eCess
2. Cess_BaseAmt=BED_TaxAmt
Cess_TaxAmt=Cess_BaseAmt*Cess_Rate
For HCess
3. HSCess_BaseAmt=BED_TaxAmt
HSCess_TaxAmt=HSCess_BaseAmt*HSCess_Rate
for VAT on CenVAT
4. VAT_BaseAmt=Total
VAT_TaxAmt=VAT_BaseAmt*VAT_Rate
In Your transaction there must be two Unit Prices.
one from dealer on which VAT is applicable and other (Assassable value) from direct manufacturer on which Excise Duty is applicable if I'm not wrong.
In that case you have to put Unit from Dealer in Unit Proce Column and price on which Excise is being calculated should be put in Assassable Value INR column (Activate from form setting if disabled).
Now when you create and apply above combination of tax.
Hope it will solve your problem....
Regards,
Rahul

Problem with Excise Duty tax calcualtion in Invoice

Hi experts,
Need your rexpert advise on the below issue.
We have MM invoice where by the tax is not calucalted correctly.
The Material is subject to excise duty, on the GR the excise invoice is getting generated with Cenvat clering account with correct amount towards excise duty
i.e. GR is done for amount - 52951.33 and corresponding Tax code is KE(10% excise duty, 3% Ecess and 2% CST) which comes correctly as 6214.73 approximately which is correct in case of GR
But however when the Invoice is posted for corresponding GR, the amount of tax calculated is only 1307.50, which should have been 6214.73 as the amount on the GR.
We really are not able to find out why their is diffrences in the calculation of excise duty.
Request your expert advise on this regard.
Thanks.
Shahid.

System will fetch the duties from J_1IGRXREF table into MIRO transaction. So firstly check whether duties are correctly updated for the respective Excise invoice in the said table.
Secondly ensure you have selected the correct tax code in MIRO same as PO tax code. There may be a chance that user had changed the tax code after posting the GRN in the Purchase order.
Finally check whether the condition records are valid for the selected tax code in FV13 transaction code and are not set to deleted.

Problem in Excise invoice

Hi Friends,
I am facing problem while saving the excise invoice...
please help me.....
Error:
No account was specified for account type "S" in item "0000000001" of the FI/CO document.
with regards

Hi Friends,
while saving excise invoice i am facing problem.
Below is the Error message...
No account is specified in item 0000000001
Message no. F5670
Diagnosis
No account was specified for account type "S" in item "0000000001" of the FI/CO document.
System Response
The Financial Accounting program cannot process the document.
Procedure
A system error has probably occurred in the application you called up. Check the data transferred to item "0000000001" of the FI/CO document.
with regards

PROBLEM IN EXCISE ( CIN)MM

Dear cons
I have been facing a problem since long.In capital goods transfer of credit (t-code- J2I8) we can utilize 50% of BED in this year & rest 50% in other year. Then how can we utilize 50% of AED in this year & rest in other year. What is the procedure for this? We are facing problem in the AED case
regards,
nrk

hey,
As per law u can avail 100% credit of AED on capital goods in the first year only.
dont need to bifurgate the same.Its not the problem its a standard functinality
regards,
sujit

SQL query problem - select max (case... aggregate function)

Hi,
I have a problem with below sql query, it gives me problem/error message 'ORA-00937: not a single-group group function', why?
select sag.afdeling, sag.sagsnr, to_char(sag.start_dato, 'yyyy-mm-dd'), sag.stat, BOGF_TRANS.TRANSTYPE,
max (case when BOGF_TRANS.TRANSTYPE = 'K' then sum(bogf_trans.belobdkk) end) + -- as "TRANSTYPE K",
max (case when BOGF_TRANS.TRANSTYPE = 'D' then sum(bogf_trans.belobdkk) end) as "TRANSTYPE K & D",
max (case when BOGF_TRANS.TRANSTYPE = 'S' then sum(bogf_trans.belobdkk) end) as "SUM TRANSTYPE S"
from sag
join bogf_trans on sag.selskab = bogf_trans.selskab and sag.sagsnr = bogf_trans.sagsnr and sag.afdeling = bogf_trans.afdeling
where SAG.SELSKAB=37 and SAG.AFDELING = 'SUS' AND SAG.SAGSNR = 10876
group by sag.afdeling, sag.sagsnr, sag.start_dato, sag.stat, BOGF_TRANS.TRANSTYPE
If I exclude (columns) as below it give me correct summations (max (case... sum(...)) but then I miss some important info that I need
select
max (case when BOGF_TRANS.TRANSTYPE = 'K' then sum(bogf_trans.belobdkk) end) + -- as "TRANSTYPE K",
max (case when BOGF_TRANS.TRANSTYPE = 'D' then sum(bogf_trans.belobdkk) end) as "TRANSTYPE K & D",
max (case when BOGF_TRANS.TRANSTYPE = 'S' then sum(bogf_trans.belobdkk) end) as "SUM TRANSTYPE S"
from sag
join bogf_trans on sag.selskab = bogf_trans.selskab and sag.sagsnr = bogf_trans.sagsnr and sag.afdeling = bogf_trans.afdeling
where SAG.SELSKAB=37 and SAG.AFDELING = 'SUS' AND SAG.SAGSNR = 10876
group by sag.afdeling, sag.sagsnr, sag.start_dato, sag.stat, BOGF_TRANS.TRANSTYPE
Any ideas?

Moved to more sutable forum, sorry.

Problem in APDU-case 1:No command,no response

Hello evrybody.I have done a method in my java card applet which does not return any command data neither response data.
I wrote in my APDU script the following(as defined the case 1 in the Zhiqun Chen's book-page 102,says that "P3(the 5th field in the APDU buffer) has to be 0"):
//CLA INS P1 P2 P3
0xB1 0x50 0x00 0x00 0x00;
Howevr, the executed APDU script returns me the following:
com.sun.javacard.apdutool.ReaderWriterError: Encountered ";" at line 105, column
25.
Was expecting one of: <INTEGER_LITERAL> ...
<CHARACTER_LITERAL> ...
<STRING_LITERAL> ...
I have tried to add another 0x00 byte at the end of the above script line, as follwoing:
//CLA INS P1 P2 Lc Le
0xB1 0x50 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00;
//WIth the idea that Lc=0(no command data) and Le=0(no response data)
I noticed that the method is working properly(does the work that has to do;I tested and I am definetely sure) but on the other hand the executed APDU script returns as SW1 SW2 the following:
CLA: b1, INS: 50, P1: 00, P2: 00, Lc: 00, Le: 00, SW1: 6f, SW2: 00 (!!!!)
Actually,I was waiting for SW1 SW2 == 90 00.
I do not know why this is returned.
Do you know what it is going wrong?
I will appreciate any help and guidance.
Thank you for you time.

I will give the code of my function.I think the problem is in the code of this method(function).I will give you in order to have a look at it:
private void delete_all_records(APDU apdu)
     ver_pin();
     byte[] buffer=apdu.getBuffer();
     byte get_P1=buffer[ISO7816.OFFSET_P1];
     byte P3=buffer[ISO7816.OFFSET_LC];
     //Check the appropriate syntax
     if (get_P1!=(byte)0) // || (P3!=(byte)0) )
     ISOException.throwIt (SW_SYNTAX_DEL_ERROR);
// else
     //Delete all the record.This for loop
     //deletes all the records' ids.
     for (short i=0;i<kostas.length;i++)
     kostas[(short)i].record_id=(byte)0;
I did not use any of the functions such as sendBytes() or apdu.setIncomingAndReceive because I did not want to take data either to return response data.Do you have any idea what's going on?
I will really apprecitae any help.Thank you for your time.

Problem with a case structure

I have the following problem:
I want that the structure from the TRUE case of the bigger case structure to start only when I switch from the button and activate the TRUE position. I observed with the probe tool that the structure is still executed in backgroun even if the bigger case is on FALSE. I want to make it start from the first position (the default case) of the inner case structure whenever I will switch from the button. I hope I made myself cleared. Thanks
Solved!
Go to Solution.
Attachments:
Untitled 3.vi ‏77 KB

Hi maryus,
your observation (or better assumption) is wrong.
As long as you set your button to FALSE the inner case structure in the TRUE case is not executed!
But: when you switch to TRUE case you wired the loop iterator to the inner case selector. So the inner case structure is not starting with it's first case but with the case corresponding to loop iteration count!
You can see all this by using execution highlighting!
Btw. when you have several cases in a case structure you can combine them to one case. It's all explained in the context help of the case structure! So you can combine cases (1, 3,4,6) and (2,5,7) into just one case each…
Edit: Damn, Christian was faster (with same conclusions)…
Best regards,
GerdW
CLAD, using 2009SP1 + LV2011SP1 + LV2014SP1 on WinXP+Win7+cRIO
Kudos are welcome

Higher Education cess problem in excise invoice.

Hi,
While creating excise invoice using the transaction j1iin with respect to the export commercial invoice, what is happening is that the higher education cess is appearing in the create mode of the excise invoice, but once while we are going to save the document and after opening in the change mode, the document does not contain the higher education cess. And also the transaction is not hitting the G/L account
What might be the reason. Please give suggestions.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Anup.

Dear Anupam,
As Rithvika has suggested......the coding if done in user exit will solve your problem and here you need to put Suppress Calculation=X. There is no other way to solve your current problem.
Would suggest that whenever you face any problem, you should check the existing threads on the same first and then only go for the new thread.
Rgds,
Antima

Problems with Upper Case Letters on Keyboard

Suddenly my keyboard will not print a capital i. in fact, if i use the caps key, it won't even put the letter i in either upper or lower case. When i put the caps lock on, can get a capitol 'I', but once the cap lock is off it is back to the lower case i again.
is there anything i can do to correct this, without taking my computer keyboard in for service? i broke my neck about 3 weeks ago and i am house bound for the next 5 weeks.
Sheila K.

Hey Sam,
im having the very same problem even though iv only had my ibook g4 for just under 5 months. i believe that puts me still under the 1 year warrenty for the computer itself. will they still replace the keyboard if this is the case. if they decide not to do so. i was wondering if anyone here new the part number for the keyboard that is easly installed on the g4 ibooks. if anyone here knows anything on the matter please feel free to email me on this.
as most people can see, i also have a power mac g5 desktop, otherwise called a cheese grader. if you know what i mean. theres very little i dont like apples computers. thats probally why everything in my house is mac related. having 3 ipods, 1 g4 ibook, a power mac g5, isight cam, and lots more. the point here is in the event people are trying to decide what kind of coomputer there wanting to buy. several things need to be considered before you should go out and buy one. obviously price has alot to do with your choice, but in that decision you must also consider whether or not the computer has teachnical type issues. is the company well known for having lots of problems. will you be able to get the technical support you need in the event there is some major problem with the computer that you may be inquiring on. having the apple care protection plan on all of apple's top computers is the single one thing that people dont think about when buying a new brand name computer. i cant tell people enough that buying this apple care plan is vital to the survival of you and your new computer. an extra $200-$400 is well worth the expense down the line.

Problem with Excise Registers

Dear all,
We have some problems in CIN related issues
1. J2IER-1 Balances are not matching with values that are in excise Registers.
2. J2I6 : On Debit Side Cess and H.S.Edu Cess not apearing in the RG23A-II
Kindly suggest where should i check it.So that i will able to get all details correctly.
Best Regards,
Kapil

Hi,
Check it in Report J2I9 to compare the Excise Duty Values.
Here you will get 2 options;
- Annexure: - For details of each invoice
- Abstract: - Excise value summary

Init-problem in swich-case

I have to init the "a1" and "k" inside the if-advise, but I want use it outside the if-advise, too and there he can't resolve symbol....
case 1:
if(a1 == null){
//there is my problem!!!!!!!!
a1 = new String[100];
int k=0;
a1[k] = testResponse.substring(0,10);
System.out.println(a1[k]);
k++;
break;

perhaps it would be easier if there is a way to append String to an array like StringBuffer.append(String) or in "php" array[] .= string (there it gets the last index of the array, iterates it and then automatically appends the string..)
maybe if have to think about a completely different way to solve my problem...
String[] a0,a1;
switch(x){
case 0:
if(a0 == null){
a0 = new String[100];
int k1=0;
a0[k1] = testResponse.substring(0,10);
k1++;
break;
case 1:
if(a1 == null){
a1 = new String[100];
int k2=0;
a1[k2] = testResponse[i].substring(0,10);
k2++;
break;

Problem in excise case

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for