Problem in FEBA / FB05 with document type

Hi:
I have a requirement. My users need the possibiliyu to choose the document type when they use FEBA TX. When FEBA is used, it calls FB05 TX, but you cannot choose the document class. We have defined a posting rule that uses in only a document type in this case, but when we use FEBA we cannot change document type. We need the possibility to choose several document types. I tried with OB28 Validation of Accounting Documents, but doesn`t work.
Please, do
you have any idea, user exit or solution for this problem? Release 4.6.C
Thanks in advance.
Best regards

the structure arc_buffer has following fields
RCSZK
RNAME
CHECKSUM
FLAGS
SEGMENT
so in the routine
PERFORM read_file USING handle_tab_wa-offset record_len
CHANGING arc_buffer(record_len)  "here just use it like arc_buffer-<field_name>(record_len)
error_handling
p_message.
or before calling the perform statement
data:lv_string type string.
call method cl_abap_container_utilities=>fill_container_c
exporting
im_value = arc_buffer
importing
ex_container = lv_string
exceptions
illegal_parameter_type = 1
others = 2.
PERFORM read_file USING handle_tab_wa-offset record_len
CHANGING lv_string(record_len)  "here just use it like arc_buffer-<field_name>(record_len)
error_handling
p_message.

Similar Messages

  • SD invoice posted with document type RV ,

    Hi all,
    I try to do incoming payment for SD invoice posted with document type - RV. when i used to do incoming payment by transc code: f-28. An ABAP dun error occurs, stating termination " message type-X".
    Is it possible to do incoming payment for SD invoice from FI. Urgent help needed.
    Regards
    Raj

    Hi,
    Once an Invoice is created in SD, An Accounting document is generated with document type RV. RV Doc. Type shows that the customer is liable to pay the amount.
    While you post the document through f-28, the document type shuld be changed to customer payment.
    It may be one of the reason. So select the docment type customr payment  but not RV and try
    Regards

  • Getting error while processing EDIFACT-D96A-ORDERS.. Agreement not found for trading partners: FromTP HTP, ToTP null with document type ORDERS-D96A-OUTBOUND

    Hi Anuj & All,
        I'm trying to create an outbound scenario with EDIFACT-D96A-ORDERS. A simple SOA composite application polling data from DB and through B2B adapter 'send' option provides data to B2B system.
    Set up two partner profiles like this,
    Host:
    Name: HTP
    EDI Group ID: HTP
    EDI Interchange ID: Interchange Sen
    EDI Interchange ID Qualifier: 01
    Remote:
    Name: RTP
    EDI Group ID: RTP
    EDI Interchange ID: Interchange Rec
    EDI Interchange ID Qualifier: 01
    Other settings are as usual. Delivery channel of generic file created on RTH.
    Now, few documents settings on B2B console are like this,
    D96A-> Interchange tab
    Create UNA: Never
    ORDERS-> Transaction
    Functional Group Identifier Code: ORDERS
    Controlling Agency: UN
    - other properties are unchanged.
    On SOA side, the bpel invoke activity which calls B2B adapter has following properties:
    <invoke name="InvokeOrders"
      inputVariable="InvokeOrders_send_InputVariable"
      partnerLink="D96A.ORDERS" portType="ns2:send_ptt"
      operation="send" bpelx:invokeAsDetail="no">
    <bpelx:inputProperty name="b2b.toTradingPartnerIdType"
        expression="'NAME'"/>
    <bpelx:inputProperty name="b2b.toTradingPartnerId"
        expression="'RTP'"/>
    <bpelx:inputProperty name="b2b.messageType" expression="1"/>
    <bpelx:inputProperty name="b2b.messageId" variable="messageID"/>
    <bpelx:inputProperty name="b2b.fromTradingPartnerIdType"
        expression="'NAME'"/>
    <bpelx:inputProperty name="b2b.fromTradingPartnerId"
        expression="'HTP'"/>
    <bpelx:inputProperty name="b2b.documentTypeName"
        expression="'ORDERS'"/>
    <bpelx:inputProperty name="b2b.documentProtocolVersion"
        expression="'D96A'"/>
    <bpelx:inputProperty name="b2b.documentProtocolName"
        expression="'EDIFACT'"/>
    <bpelx:inputProperty name="b2b.documentDefinitionName"
        expression="'ORDERS_def'"/>
    <bpelx:inputProperty name="b2b.conversationId"
        variable="ConversationID"/>
    </invoke>
    The error I'm getting on B2B Console->Reports->Business Message, while running this is,
    Error Code B2B-50547
    Error Description Machine Info: (htp01310-vm01.htp.com) Description: Agreement not found for trading partners: FromTP HTP, ToTP null with document type ORDERS-D96A-OUTBOUND.
    Error Level ERROR_LEVEL_COLLABORATION
    Error Severity ERROR
    Error Text Agreement not found for trading partners: FromTP HTP, ToTP null with document type ORDERS-D96A-OUTBOUND.
    Note: On Manage Deployment Tab I've checked the agreement is in active state.
    -- Business Message (Result):--
    State: MSG_ERROR
    Document Type: ORDERS
    Agreement: <blank>
    Sender: HTP
    Receiver: <blank>
    -- Application Message (Result):--
    Sender Id Type: NAME
    Sender Value: TCS
    Receiver Id Type: NAME
    Receiver Value: ORCL
    Document Type: ORDERS
    Document Definition: ORDERS_def
    Document Protocol Name: EDIFACT
    Document Protocol Version: D96A
    Direction: OUTBOUND
    State: MSG_COMPLETE
    - Can anybody please shoot some pointer on how to resolve this? Please let me know if you need further configuration details which I've not mentioned here.
    Regards,
    - @bhijit

    Hi Mariusz,
        Thanks for your reply. Yes I think so, probably you're right. But finest trace level doesn't give much clues on "wrong mapped" data. Anyway, here is the detail log. Please don't forget to point out if you find something interesting.
    #### <Error> <oracle.soa.b2b.engine> <htp01310-vm01.htp.com> <soa_server1> <Workmanager: , Version: 0, Scheduled=false, Started=false, Wait time: 0 ms
    > <<anonymous>> <BEA1-0D3F5ABAC0B2E50C6CCB> <449b4b64fa2729cc:59737e36:146f08831ee:-8000-0000000000127da6> <1404379704092> <BEA-000000> <Error -:  B2B-50547:  Agreement not found for trading partners: FromTP HTP, ToTP null with document type ORDERS-D96A-OUTBOUND.
      at oracle.tip.b2b.tpa.RepoDataAccessor.queryAgreementMO(RepoDataAccessor.java:887)
      at oracle.tip.b2b.tpa.RepoDataAccessor.getAgreementDetails(RepoDataAccessor.java:415)
      at oracle.tip.b2b.tpa.TPAProcessor.processTPA(TPAProcessor.java:465)
      at oracle.tip.b2b.tpa.TPAProcessor.processOutgoingTPA(TPAProcessor.java:224)
      at oracle.tip.b2b.engine.Engine.processOutgoingMessageImpl(Engine.java:1555)
      at oracle.tip.b2b.engine.Engine.processOutgoingMessage(Engine.java:819)
      at oracle.tip.b2b.engine.Engine.outgoingContinueProcess(Engine.java:4100)
      at oracle.tip.b2b.engine.Engine.handleMessageEvent(Engine.java:3921)
      at oracle.tip.b2b.engine.Engine.processEvents(Engine.java:3309)
      at oracle.tip.b2b.engine.ThreadWorkExecutor.processEvent(ThreadWorkExecutor.java:637)
      at oracle.tip.b2b.engine.ThreadWorkExecutor.run(ThreadWorkExecutor.java:214)
      at oracle.integration.platform.blocks.executor.WorkManagerExecutor$1.run(WorkManagerExecutor.java:120)
      at weblogic.work.j2ee.J2EEWorkManager$WorkWithListener.run(J2EEWorkManager.java:184)
      at weblogic.work.DaemonWorkThread.run(DaemonWorkThread.java:30)
    Error -:  B2B-50547:  Agreement not found for trading partners: FromTP HTP, ToTP null with document type ORDERS-D96A-OUTBOUND.
      at oracle.tip.b2b.tpa.RepoDataAccessor.queryAgreementMO(RepoDataAccessor.java:887)
      at oracle.tip.b2b.tpa.RepoDataAccessor.getAgreementDetails(RepoDataAccessor.java:415)
      at oracle.tip.b2b.tpa.TPAProcessor.processTPA(TPAProcessor.java:465)
      at oracle.tip.b2b.tpa.TPAProcessor.processOutgoingTPA(TPAProcessor.java:224)
      at oracle.tip.b2b.engine.Engine.processOutgoingMessageImpl(Engine.java:1555)
      at oracle.tip.b2b.engine.Engine.processOutgoingMessage(Engine.java:819)
      at oracle.tip.b2b.engine.Engine.outgoingContinueProcess(Engine.java:4100)
      at oracle.tip.b2b.engine.Engine.handleMessageEvent(Engine.java:3921)
      at oracle.tip.b2b.engine.Engine.processEvents(Engine.java:3309)
      at oracle.tip.b2b.engine.ThreadWorkExecutor.processEvent(ThreadWorkExecutor.java:637)
      at oracle.tip.b2b.engine.ThreadWorkExecutor.run(ThreadWorkExecutor.java:214)
      at oracle.integration.platform.blocks.executor.WorkManagerExecutor$1.run(WorkManagerExecutor.java:120)
      at weblogic.work.j2ee.J2EEWorkManager$WorkWithListener.run(J2EEWorkManager.java:184)
      at weblogic.work.DaemonWorkThread.run(DaemonWorkThread.java:30)
    >
    #### <Error> <oracle.soa.b2b.engine> <htp01310-vm01.htp.com> <soa_server1> <Workmanager: , Version: 0, Scheduled=false, Started=false, Wait time: 0 ms
    > <<anonymous>> <BEA1-0D3F5ABAC0B2E50C6CCB> <449b4b64fa2729cc:59737e36:146f08831ee:-8000-0000000000127da6> <1404379704569> <BEA-000000> <Error -:  B2B-50547:  Agreement not found for trading partners: FromTP HTP, ToTP null with document type ORDERS-D96A-OUTBOUND.
      at oracle.tip.b2b.tpa.RepoDataAccessor.queryAgreementMO(RepoDataAccessor.java:887)
      at oracle.tip.b2b.tpa.RepoDataAccessor.getAgreementDetails(RepoDataAccessor.java:415)
      at oracle.tip.b2b.tpa.TPAProcessor.processTPA(TPAProcessor.java:465)
      at oracle.tip.b2b.tpa.TPAProcessor.processOutgoingTPA(TPAProcessor.java:224)
      at oracle.tip.b2b.engine.Engine.processOutgoingMessageImpl(Engine.java:1555)
      at oracle.tip.b2b.engine.Engine.processOutgoingMessage(Engine.java:819)
      at oracle.tip.b2b.engine.Engine.outgoingContinueProcess(Engine.java:4100)
      at oracle.tip.b2b.engine.Engine.handleMessageEvent(Engine.java:3921)
      at oracle.tip.b2b.engine.Engine.processEvents(Engine.java:3309)
      at oracle.tip.b2b.engine.ThreadWorkExecutor.processEvent(ThreadWorkExecutor.java:637)
      at oracle.tip.b2b.engine.ThreadWorkExecutor.run(ThreadWorkExecutor.java:214)
      at oracle.integration.platform.blocks.executor.WorkManagerExecutor$1.run(WorkManagerExecutor.java:120)
      at weblogic.work.j2ee.J2EEWorkManager$WorkWithListener.run(J2EEWorkManager.java:184)
      at weblogic.work.DaemonWorkThread.run(DaemonWorkThread.java:30)
    Error -:  B2B-50547:  Agreement not found for trading partners: FromTP HTP, ToTP null with document type ORDERS-D96A-OUTBOUND.
      at oracle.tip.b2b.tpa.RepoDataAccessor.queryAgreementMO(RepoDataAccessor.java:887)
      at oracle.tip.b2b.tpa.RepoDataAccessor.getAgreementDetails(RepoDataAccessor.java:415)
      at oracle.tip.b2b.tpa.TPAProcessor.processTPA(TPAProcessor.java:465)
      at oracle.tip.b2b.tpa.TPAProcessor.processOutgoingTPA(TPAProcessor.java:224)
      at oracle.tip.b2b.engine.Engine.processOutgoingMessageImpl(Engine.java:1555)
      at oracle.tip.b2b.engine.Engine.processOutgoingMessage(Engine.java:819)
      at oracle.tip.b2b.engine.Engine.outgoingContinueProcess(Engine.java:4100)
      at oracle.tip.b2b.engine.Engine.handleMessageEvent(Engine.java:3921)
      at oracle.tip.b2b.engine.Engine.processEvents(Engine.java:3309)
      at oracle.tip.b2b.engine.ThreadWorkExecutor.processEvent(ThreadWorkExecutor.java:637)
      at oracle.tip.b2b.engine.ThreadWorkExecutor.run(ThreadWorkExecutor.java:214)
      at oracle.integration.platform.blocks.executor.WorkManagerExecutor$1.run(WorkManagerExecutor.java:120)
      at weblogic.work.j2ee.J2EEWorkManager$WorkWithListener.run(J2EEWorkManager.java:184)
      at weblogic.work.DaemonWorkThread.run(DaemonWorkThread.java:30)
    >
    Rgds,
    - Abhijit
    P.S. - Can you please check what is the value of "Functional Group Identifier Code" for D96A ORDERS.

  • Problem with document type on WF for parking document

    Hello
    Iu2019m actually working on  the SAP workflow dealing  with the FIPP object and  the event u201Ccreatedu201D (FI park document transaction (FV60)).
    The problem is that the WF is launched for all document types wich is not the need of the customer. Iu2019m looking for a solution to launch the WF for some specific document types.
    Iu2019ve already tried to use  the workflow variant, approval groups, paths and procedure with no success. (SPRO -> financial accouting-> accounts receivable and accounts payable -> business transaction -> incoming credit invoice memo -> make and check setting for document parking)
    Thank you for help.
    SL

    Here is the solution I have  eventually found :
    1-      Application of the OSS note 559276 which enables the customizing of the workflow variant (the transaction OBWD becomes here effective)
    2-     Assignment of the documents types, workflow variants and release approval groups with the transaction OBWD.
    Therefore, the document types that are not defined in the transaction OBWD will not require validation (no workflow will be launched).
    SL

  • Problem with document type in ME51N

    Hi all,
    ME51N transaction will pickup NB document type by default. We can change the default document type by using personal settings in ME51N. But, can we restrict document type using ABAP development irrespective of default settings. Suppose NB is default doc type. If we open ME51N, some other doc type should come other than NB. Is it possible by ABAP development. Its very urgent. Please help me in  this.
    Thanks in Advance,
    Siva Sankar.

    Siva Sankar
    You may use Field Exit to do this enhancement. You can create fieldexit from report RSMODPRF.
    In order to use field exit check/activate Profile Parameter abap/fieldexit using t code RZ11.
    Thanks & regards
    Amol Lohade

  • Authorisation combined with document type, activity and status

    I want to create a role for a user who is only allowed to create and change document type ZDI  in status IW .
    Which object authorization can provided this check ?
    The object authorization C_DRAW_TCD  control only the activity (create/modify) and the document type (ZDI).
    The object authorization C_DRAW_STA control only  the document type (ZDI) and the status of the document (IW).
    But I need the combination of the both authorization. Does a possibility exist in standard to do it without create a client new authorisation?
    Thanks in advance for your help.
    Amande

    Thanks for your response.
    But it doesn't works as I want.
    The object authorisation C_DRAW_TCS  is checked before the save but not after save with the changed values.
    for example :
    the user has the following authorizations in the modification role:
      C_DRAW_TCS  activity 02 document type ZDI  document status IW 
      C_DRAW_TCD document type ZDI  activity 02
      C_DRAW_STA document type ZDI status IW
    The user has also the autorisation C_DRAW_STA document type ZDI status FI  in the display role
    With this configuration the user can modify the document ZDI in status IW and change the status into FI . I don't want that the user can change the status into FI. Does exist a possibility to avoid this?
    Of course, after storing this change of the status , the user can't access to the document ZDI with status FI.
    SAP doesn't check the authorization C_DRAW_TCS  activity 02 document type ZDI  document status FI  after status change.
    Thanks in advance
    Amande

  • Flexupload Method for Manual Elimination - Flexupload with Document Type

    Hi All
    My Customer has Multiple Lines of Manual Elimination Entry every Month. I was wondering is there any way to Process Flexupload Method - DOCUMENT TYPES in SEM-BCS? as I 'd tried in *Data Collections*, It wont pull up Posting Level-20 Document Type
    Data Collections Only from Posting Level 00 to 10
    Appreciated Your Thoughts and Help
    Regards
    Ramana

    Hi,
    did I understand that right: You want to upload eliminations?
    In SEM-BCS you can only upload either master data or reporting data.
    For reporting data you upload data on items with subassignments (e.g. movement type).
    If your customer a bundle of some eliminations that are always the same, then why don't you a manual posting and customize it with a document type without automatic inversion? These postings will appear in every following year after posting. This is available for all posting levels (01-30).
    You could, of course, use a "strange way" and customize a flex upload with "reported financial data" and create a upload file with the special data for those entries.
    BR
    Benjamin Maier

  • Retriggering Release strategy for PR with Document Type, Company Code and Price Range as Characaterstics

    Hi Friends,
    I have a issue to fix. The issue is releated to PR.
    There are some PR's in the system which has wrong release strategy picked up or wrong approvers picked up due to some congif change. now that the config changes are rectified correctly, we need to find a solution to correct the PR's which got affected due this.
    I have to retrigger the release strategy for all the affected PR's.
    The characterstics which we have consider for release strategy is Document Type, Company Code and Price Range.
    Can anyone suggest how can we retrigger the PR in bulk or individual to all the affected PR's, so that it picks up correct release strategy as per new config changes.
    Regards,
    Manjunath K

    Hi,
    Refer the discussion to triggers release again on release code addition/change in release strategy.
    release code is changed on PR release strategy - old PR can´t be approved
    Regards,
    Biju K

  • Problem related to Configuration of Document Types ?

    Hi All,
    I am going in spro->MM->Purchasing->PO->Define Document Types. In this after clicking job work PO, I am clicking on Link Purchase Requisition,there comes somedata on right. I wanna know the meaning and purpose of each field like (Doc. Type,Description, Item Category Etc Etc.).

    Hi Abhinav
    Dty
    Documnet type
    Diffeent documnet types can be mentioned. On the basis of this document type you can differentiate the purchasing document eg Po, RFQ, SA etc
    Description
    Item category in purchasing document
        Key defining how the procurement of a material or service item is
        controlled.This determines feild d selection
    NAA
    Indicator: No account assignment:Thich check box will specifcy if no account assignment is allowed for PO
    RS
    Indicator: Contract release order/SA delivery schedule
    Indicates whether release orders/releases or delivery schedules are
    possible in purchasing documents such as contracts or scheduling
    agreements.
    DI
    Dialog indicator
      Indicator specifying that the system is to issue a message to the user
      in the event of this combination of document types and item categories.
    Regards
    Vikrant

  • Problem in structure start with charecter type

    i am doing a upgrade of an abap program which is written in 4.6 to  ecc 6.0 i am facing a unicode error problem
    in the old program there is  a sap standrad structure called arc_buffer  so in this program they have used the structure  as
    below code
        PERFORM read_file USING handle_tab_wa-offset record_len
                          CHANGING arc_buffer(record_len)
                                   error_handling
                                   p_message.
    so when it is used as arc_buffer(record_len)   system is giving unicode error like
    '' the structure arc_bufffer(record_len) does not start with a charecter type field' 
    as the structure is sap standard  i think i cannot change the stadard structure so what should be done to get out of this error.

    the structure arc_buffer has following fields
    RCSZK
    RNAME
    CHECKSUM
    FLAGS
    SEGMENT
    so in the routine
    PERFORM read_file USING handle_tab_wa-offset record_len
    CHANGING arc_buffer(record_len)  "here just use it like arc_buffer-<field_name>(record_len)
    error_handling
    p_message.
    or before calling the perform statement
    data:lv_string type string.
    call method cl_abap_container_utilities=>fill_container_c
    exporting
    im_value = arc_buffer
    importing
    ex_container = lv_string
    exceptions
    illegal_parameter_type = 1
    others = 2.
    PERFORM read_file USING handle_tab_wa-offset record_len
    CHANGING lv_string(record_len)  "here just use it like arc_buffer-<field_name>(record_len)
    error_handling
    p_message.

  • Problem referencing to methods with generic type parameters

    Assuming I have an interface like to following:
    public interface Test <T> {
    void test ( T arg0 );
    void test ( T arg0, Object arg1 );
    I would like to reference to both "test"-methods using "{@link #test(T)}" and "{@link #test(T,Object)}".But this generates an error telling me "test(T)" and "test(T,Object)" cannot be found.
    Changing T to Object in the documentation works and has as interesing effect. The generated link text is "test(Object)" but the generated link is "test(T)".
    Am I somehow wrong? Or is this a known issue? And is there a workaround other than using "Object" instead of "T"?

    Hi,
    I bumped into the same problem when documenting a generic.
    After quite a while of search your posting led me to the solution.
    My code goes something like this:
    public class SomeIterator<E> implements Iterator<E> {
      public SomeIterator(E[] structToIterate) {
    }When I tried to use @see or @link with the constructor Javadoc never found it.
    After I changed the documentation code to
    @see #SomeIterator(Object[])it worked.
    Since both taglets offer the use of a label, one can easily use these to produce comments that look correct:
    @see #SomeIterator(Object[]) SomeIterator(E[])CU
    Froestel

  • PB00 conditon type in PO with document type NB-under what condition?

    Hi,
    Can anyone tell me under what circumstances PB00 condition type appears in a standard purchase order (doc. type NB) ?
    My understanding is condition records in Inforecord & contracts are always PB00,i.e. time dependant.
    & condition records in RFQs & Scheduling agreements can be made PB00 or, PBXX (time independant) through SPRO settings.
    I thought that condition type in a PO has to always be PBXX ,i.e time independant but when I create this particular PO, condition type PB00 gets populated!
    Please advise.
    Thanks,
    Kaveri

    you have worng understanding about the PB00 and PBxx conditon
    PB00 will come to PO if you have created info record or if you are creating PO reference to contract, RFQ or SA.
    but when you create the PO and there is no info record is created than system will defualt the PBxx conditon becuse the system search first all the access sequence and does not find Pb00 in than it will populate PBXX conditon
    you can review in the PO how the system is determine the condition
    to do that click on the conditon tab and hit analysis
    here the right side you will see conditon record found for PB00 andleft side youwill see from where the system find the conditon by opening the arrow.
    If po has PBXx than you want see any access seq on left

  • Problem invoking weservice of SOAP Document style with literal encoding in

    I have a webservice with Document type and with literal encoding which is deployed in weblogic. This webservice has got two methods both with no argument. If I try to invoke using weblogic interface for testing the webservice, only one method is able to invoke.The other method gives invokation error.The Soap request which is going is to this webservice is with empty body.
    the request looks like this
    <!--REQUEST.................-->
    <env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/"
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xmlns:soapenc="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/encoding/"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema">
    <env:Body>
    </env:Body>
    </env:Envelope>
    If I am changing one method signatuer in such a way that it has one argument then both methods are able to invoke.
    While I am using SAAJ api If I am trying to give the method name in the SOAP request it gives error.
    Can anybody help on this.
    tech gent

    I have realised I was using saaj 1.1 (from jwsdp 1.3) and so have updated to use 1.2 now. But the problem is still there. Should saaj 1.2 support literal encoding? I got the impression from it saying it includes "support for ws-i".

  • Document type KR is not picking to Clear GL account with T-code F-03

    Hi all,
    My client wants to clear GL account Cash-in-Transit which is open item managed. He has posted two items. One is with KR document type like Intercompnay adjustment account debit (40) and Cash-in-Transit account credit (50). Second item is with SA document type like Cash-in-Transit accont debit (40) and Intercompany adjustment account credit (50). He did not give vendor number and appropriate posting key (31) while postings. With document type KR, he posted with posting keys 40 and 50. Now while clearing the GL account through T-code F-03, system is picking only SA document type. The system is not picking document type KR. He wants to clear the items with each other. I have checked the document type settings. Check boxes Intercompany postings and trading partner are active in both above document types.
    How can the GL account be cleared ? Are any configuration settings missing ? Kindly advice as soon as possible.
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    K.S.K

    Hi,
    First of all..why would system need a Exchange gain/Loss Account..If your local currency is INR and you posted a debit and a credit document both in INR..then there is no question of a foreign exchange gain/loss account..
    BUT, if you have posted the document in any currency other than INR, ie: your local currency...then the system would need a exchnage gain/loss account when you try to clear the debits and credits.. i am giving an example below to explain better..
    You posted a debit of 100 USD @ 40 = Rs. 4000.00
    You posted a Credit of 100 USD @ 42 = Rs. 4200.00
    Now, if you clear this debit and credit then there is no difference in 100 USD, as the debit and credit is netting off.. but if you see INR there is a difference of Rs. 200.00 which system posts to Exchange gain/loss account..which we maintain in OB09.
    Hope it is clear to you now..
    Regards,
    SAPFICO.

  • Regarding inoice tab is missing in item details of document type NB

    Hi,
    We are doing intercompany stock transfer at item details in PO with document type NB Invoice tab is missing
    Kindly guide us
    Regards
    Tushar

    for intra company we are using document type UB & for intercompany we r using document type NB
    have u ever face such problems while doing intercompany stock transfer

Maybe you are looking for

  • Issues with internet connection.  Logic board?

    I have a 17" MacBook Pro (Late 2008) 2.5 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo, serial ...GV3R9.  More often than not my internet gets disconnected.  The Wi-Fi icon indicates it is ON, but there is no connection at all.  Then if I manually turn OFF the Wi-Fi, it won'

  • ISE - 802.1X - Loop not detected by spanning-tree

    Hello, I have recently implemented the 802.1X on switchs 3750-X running 15.0(2)SE IOS version. The spanning-tree bpdufilter and bpduguard are globally enabled on the switchs. A user has created a loop on the network by connecting its Cisco IP-Phone t

  • Deleting Updates in Update Retriever

    There isn't much in the documentation about how to keep your repository clean and how the deletion process works.  Let's say I see an update is superceded for a T400 and delete it.  What if that update is still needed by another model because the new

  • SSIS Foreach Loop Container not processing all files

    Morning Currently there are 3 csv file in the directory. The for-each loop container only process the first file. Everything was working fine then all of a sudden only the first file get's processed.  Ty W

  • Can we add JFrame to JPanel?

    hi I m trying to add JFrame which has JPanel with BufferedImage to another JPanel. Is it possible? if yes kindly tell me how to achieve this. thanx