Problem in Hyperion FDM Load Balance Configuration...

hi all,
I installed hyperion essbase, planning, Hfm and Fdqm 11.1.1.3 version.
but i am getting error at configuration of fdm load balance configuration....
error: when i click on Test Connection in authentication Providers(Shared services(CSS))..am getting error as Cannot create ActiveX Component
Please give me reply if u know about this Issue.
regards,
Mady

This error indicates that the COMJNIBRIDGE dcom object is not able to launch successfully or has not been registered properly on the FDM application server:
a) Start > Run > DCOMCNFG
b) Expand Component Services > Computers > My Computer > DCOM CONFIG
c) Locate the COMJNIBRIDGE object, right-click and choose "properties"
d) Click on the identity tab and choose "This user" and browse for the FDM Service account and enter/confirm the password
e) Re-test

Similar Messages

FDM Load balancer Configuration issue

We are doing the installation for Hyperion Planning, ODI and DRM on DEV environment
The EPM version we are using - 11.1.2.2
Server 1 (Windows 2008 x64)
Foundation Services
Calculation Manager
Planning Web Application
Analytical Provider Services
Essbase Administration Services web application
Oracle HTTP Server
Server 2 (Windows 2008 x64)
R & A Framework Services
R & A Framework Web Application
Financial Reporting Web Application
Web analysis Web Application
Server 3 (Windows 2008 x64)
FDM
EPMA
ODI
DRM
Essbase Integration Services
Essbase Studio
IIS 7.x
Server 4 (Windows 2008 x64)
Essbase Server
Server 5(Windows 2008 x64)
SQL Server 2008
All our services are running fine for Planning. We are in process of configuring FDM.
FDM Application Server Configuration is completed.
While doing FDM Load Balancer Configuration, we also able to connect to Shared Service directory successfully. But when we click ok to complete the configuration it gives following error -
Unable to Create Load Balancer Object!
Please verify that the user name, password, and domain are correct
Error=Cannot create ActiveX component
When checked in Event Log we found -
Unable to create Load Balance Manager object! Configuration directory could not be located. Error=-2147023878 - Retrieving the COM class factory for component with CLSID *{E652643D-6CC1-48AC-915D-01842B04F292}*
Source=TaskManagerService - at TaskManagerService.TaskItem.fGetConfigFolder()
We tried the below steps but issue still persists -
•     Start the ‘dcomcnfg’ tool in Windows
•     Expand Component Services\Computers\My Computer\Dcom-Config and locate the following object: {E652643D-6CC1-48AC-915D-01842B04F292}
•     Right-click and choose "Properties" and click on the "Security" tab
•     Click the "Edit" button and remove all users except the default: "Everyone" and "System" and click OK, then set the radio button to "Use Default"
•     Click the "Edit" button under Access Permissions and remove all users/groups except the default items and click OK, and set the radio button to "Use Default"
•     Now click the "Identity" tab and remove the ID in the "This User" field and set the radio button to "The Launching User" and click "Apply" and "OK"
•     Now try to launch the FDM Load Balance Config and all the extra tools for FDqM
We are using hypadmin as domain account but it is part of Administrators group on FDM Server (Server 3). The administrators group is also part of -
Act as part of the operating system
Bypass traverse checking
Log on as a batch job
Log on as a service
Please let us know in case if you encountered similar error on this version and possible solution for the issue.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,

I woudl clear out all users/groups on the security tab of the FDM Load Balance Server DCOm object for "Launch and Activation" and "Access" permisisons and then set the identity to the "Launching User" radio button and apply. Then re-set the config.
If that still fails, try rebooting the server and then set it.
Make sure the domain and password are also correct that is being entered.

FDM Load Balance - How does it work

Hi experts,
We are considering using FDM Load Balance in our solution. However, there are not much description on the features that the load balance provided by FDM. Is it round robin? Is it load sensitive? Does it do failover on a session level?
Where can I find more information on FDM load balance?
Thanks!

Correct, for the FDM application servers you would install the following components (FDM Application Server, FDM Load Balance Server, FDM Task Manager)
In the application servers tab of the load balance configuration you would specify both servers, the server you are on first and the other app server second
In regards to the folder, you would create a application folder share named something like "FDMDATA" and use this for the application path when creating your FDM applications.

Hardware Load Balancing Configuration and Session Clustering

          I would like to know where I can find any information on Hardware Load Balancing
          Configuration in order to leverage WLS HTTPSession clustering.
          Don Ferguson mentioned white papers on this subject however I can't seem to locate
          them.
          I am particularly interested in Cisco's 11000 Content Service Switch.
          Thanks.
          Mike Jones


Scroll to the bottom of this link. It discusses how to configure Alteon and Big-IP.
          The principles should apply to Cisco as well, but we don't have documentation on
          configuring it, as far as I know.
          http://e-docs.bea.com/wls/docs61/cluster/index.html
          -Don
          Michael Jones wrote:
          > I would like to know where I can find any information on Hardware Load Balancing
          > Configuration in order to leverage WLS HTTPSession clustering.
          > Don Ferguson mentioned white papers on this subject however I can't seem to locate
          > them.
          > I am particularly interested in Cisco's 11000 Content Service Switch.
          >
          > Thanks.
          >
          > Mike Jones

Office Web Apps Load Balancing Configuration Issue for SharePoint 2013

I have load balanced servers dedicated for Office Web Apps with name “md1xxxwfe1” and “md1xxxwfe2”
, both this servers are load balanced by CISCO Load balancer. And I have mapped Load Balancer Virutal IP with host name officeapps.jda.corp.local in the DNS records.
Things are working fine if I add new farm by using New-OfficeWebAppsFarm
with server name as internalurl in PowerShell console
as like “ -internalurl http://
md1xxxwfe1 but when I use –internalurl officeapps.jda.corp.local it is not working at all. I’m not getting what to do at this point.
I have gone through following blogs but no luck.
http://blogs.technet.com/b/meamcs/archive/2013/03/27/office-web-apps-2013-multi-servers-nlb-installation-and-deployment-for-sharepoint-2013-step-by-step-guide.aspx
http://blogs.technet.com/b/office_resource_kit/archive/2012/09/11/introducing-office-web-apps-server.aspx
http://davidlimsharepoint.blogspot.in/2013/02/installing-and-configuring-office-web.html
http://sps2013.blogspot.in/2013/09/office-web-apps-with-sharepoint-2013.html
The output of the wfe1 server is attached with this. When I open http:// /hosting/discovery in wfe1 I’m getting following result (attached
screenshot) but it should show hostname rather than server name.
Please help me
Thanks, Ram Ch

Hi Ram ,
For troubleshooting your issue, please take steps as below:
Just about any load balancing solution will work, including a server that runs the Web Server (IIS) role running Application Request Routing (ARR):Install
Application Request Routing
Install the certificate on the load balancer as described under Securing Office Web Apps Server communications by using
HTTPS.
Make sure you have configured the cluster correctly for full internet name:
Reference:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/jj219435.aspx#loadbalancer
Thanks,
Eric
Forum Support
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support,
contact [email protected]
Eric Tao
TechNet Community Support

ACE Load Balancing Configuration For NATed User Traffic

Hello,
I am currently working on a requirement where the shared application services will be hosted in DC and these services will be accessed by multiple (thousands) users from different corporates/customers. The user traffic will be hidden behind customer's proxy servers or firewalls so the load balancer (ACE modules) services hosted in DC will not be able to see requests coming in from induvidual users IP addresses.
In this scenario what are options of load balancing are available in Lyer3/4 and Layer7 ?
Thanks in advance for your help.
Sanjay

Hi Sanjay,
In a set up where all users are coming from behind a proxy, all users will be loadbalanced to same server thus overloading it. This is when you are doing standard L3/L4 LB.
In the situation of proxies, for HTTP applications you shall use L7 LB and use information(cookie) in HTTP client request or server response. The ace will use this information to stick the user to same server for persistence. If a client comes with no cookie it will be loadbalanced according to the predictor method configured. Below is the link for L7 configuration example and other TS steps you can take while configuring L7 policies on ACE. For more informatin i would suggest reading ACE user guide too.
http://docwiki.cisco.com/wiki/Cisco_Application_Control_Engine_(ACE)_Troubleshooting_Guide_-_Troubleshooting_Layer_7_Load_Balancing
If you have any questions please feel free to ask.
Regards,
Kanwal

FDM Load Balance Installation for (Essbase) Plannig Application

we are unable to configure the <FM 11.1.1.2>; FM Load Balancer using MAD & getting following error message during Logon Test:
Error Msg Recieved - "Unable to bind to directory using the configured username and password" 80090308: LdapErr: DSID-0C090334, comment: AcceptSecurityContext error, data 525, vece
We have specified the qualified name in FM & got confirmation from Network guys e.g.
CN=USR,OU=Groups,OU=USA,OU=USA-Branch,OU=Users,OU=Production
Has anyone seen this type of issue before or can share their MAD configuration details?
Thank you,

Sorry, i mentioned MAD instead of MSAD..
Thx.

Load balance configuration for clustering

we are going to setup multiple servers (clustering) for the BIEE. What configuration needs to be done to make them clustering? And, what is the load balancing alogrithmn behind? Pls help. thks.

Which articles & documentation have you read already? I don't want to duplicate what they've covered.
http://catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html#beprecise

Exchange 2010 ACE30 Load Balancer Configuration

Afternoon Everybody,
Does anybody have any good documentation, or example configurations on how to load balance client traffic inbound to distrbuted Exchange 2010 Client Access Servers they could share please?
We have a basic configuration in place that is troblesome that is using sticky based persistence for all services, with basic health probes looking at ports 25, 80, 443 and RPC specific ports on 135, 6000, 60001. We are seeing major packet drops/loss as well as resets of the connections between the health probes and the servers that in turn take the servers out of the farm causing major downtime.
I would very much appreciate any pointers or guidance.
Thanks in advance.
Darrel

Hi Darrel,
Is there any specific requirement from the application side?
Can you go through the below links and see if they help you?
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/solutions/Enterprise/Data_Center/App_Networking/hypervexchange.html
https://supportforums.cisco.com/thread/2123412
Regards,
Kanwal

Modifying the goto URL - load balancer configuration

Hi,
I am trying to find the location of the display.template which I can modify to change the "goto" parameter URL.
Objective:
When I hit my loadbalancer URL "http://172.11.124.23/portal"
It basically can forward the request to ports 8080,8081 or 8082.
but I see the following in the browser after the redirection
http://myportal.domain.corp:8080/amserver/UI/Login?goto=http://172.11.124.23/portal/dt
instead of
http://myportal.domain.corp:8080/amserver/UI/Login?goto=http://myportal.domain.com/portal/dt
so basically I get the acess manager login page but after authentication it goes back to the loadbalancer since the goto URL is'nt right.and load balancer again sends the request back to access manager.So it kinda loops back and forth betn load balancer and access manager.
I read on the forum which says display.template should be modified to correct the goto URL.
I am working in linux env.I tried changing the display.template at the following location but I dont see what I want.
/var/opt/sun/portal/portals/portal1/desktop/default/LoginProvider
Can you point me in the right direction.!
Thanks,
Deepak.

c'mmon guys...help me..its urgent !!!!

Load Balance Configuration for OCS 10g

Hi guys,
A few question on the load balancer requirement and setup for a OCS 10g cluster.
1. Can Pound be used as the load balancer for the OCS cluster. (pound is an application for load balancer and reverse proxy).
2. Basically the load balancer will have two network interface, the first nic is connected to the
user network, and the second interface is connected at the backend network where the ocs cluster is located. My question is at which network interface the virtual server name (ldap, sso and http ) for the ocs cluster should be created ? at the user network interface or the ocs network interface ?. Do the virtual name need an ip addresses ?
Thanks for any info.
Regards
lanang

Which articles & documentation have you read already? I don't want to duplicate what they've covered.
http://catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html#beprecise

Logon Load Balancing / Configuring Logon Groups problem

In existing system setting:
One Logon group (PUBLIC) and point to one instances. This setting is work and SAP LOGON default clinet no is 320.
I try to install one more instances on other server and add to same Logon group (PUBLIC).
Install compent as below:
SAP ERP 2005 Support Release 2 -> SAP systems -> MS SQL, Server -> High available system -> Base on ABAP System -> Dialog System
The instance has been installed and start and stop this instance is successful.
Add instance into logon group (PUBLIC)
Logon system via logon group, the logon redirect to new instanace server. But the default client no has been changed from 320 to 001. Change client from 001 to 320 and logon. But no response from new instance server.
Any suggestion to solve this problem.
Thanks!

I found the profile in profile directory as below:
default.1.pfl
COQ_D02_BSSPI11 (New Instance)
START_D02_BSSPI11 (New Instance)
COQ_DVEBMGS02_bssco11 (existing Instance)
START_DVEBMGS02_bssco11 (existing Instance)
I strat the new instance and add to Public group and logon successful.
The problem is in transaction RZ10.
I cannot select COQ_D02_BSSPI11 and START_D02_BSSPI11 profile from Profile field.
how to fix it.
Thanks!

ACE 4710 HTTPS load balance configuration

Have two ACE 4710 in HA setup. We would like to setup HTTPS loadbalance(actually just a primary and standby configuration in the serverfarm). Initially this would be for Exchange OWA connections but may expand to more HTTPS connections later.
I know there are several ways to do SSL with the ACE( client, server, end-to-end). I am just wanting to know the easiest way to deploy this? Is a certificate always needed on the ACE for each connection? In HA mode would a certificate be needed for both or does it replicate in some way to the other ACE?
Any configuration examples would be helpful.
Thanks.

IF you terminate SSL on the ACE you need certificates and key on ace in the context in which you are doing the termination. The certs and keys need to be installed on the active and standby (manually unless using anm to manage).
when speaking of SSL
SSL termination refers to ace terminating SSL and sending to server as clear text
end to end - ACE terminates SSL (to look into payload to make a loadbalance decision or sticky decision) and then re-encrypts to the server, so to the client ACE is an ssl server and to the server the ace is an ssl client.
You can find some config examples at
http://docwiki.cisco.com/wiki/Category:Data_Center_Application_Services_Configuration_Examples

ACE Load Balancing Problem

Hi,
I have ACE 4701 with c4710ace-mz.A3_2_2.bin image. In the current setup ACE is located in the center of network where all the WAN, Intenret and LAN is connected and ACE has default towards Internet and All other segment has default route towards ACE appliance. ACe is only redirecting the port 80 traffic to my Proxy server and bypass my lan subnet on port 80.
Internet
i
i
i
i
i
ACE--------------------------------WAN
i
i
i
i
LAN
I want to use ACE for the load balancing of two servers. Today I did the load balancing configuration but as soon as I applied the policy map on the interface vlan 200 and 300, my complete network reachability went down. When I remove the policy my network came back to normal.
192.168.200.66 FAX Server-1
192.1168.200.67 FAX Server-2
192.168.200.65   Virtual IP address
Attached is the configuration that I did on ACE for the load balancing and below is the current configuration of the ACE appliance.
access-list acl-in remark ACCESS LIST FOR ACE-INSIDE
access-list acl-in line 1 extended permit ip any any
access-list acl-out remark ACCESS LIST FOR ACE-OUTSIDE
access-list acl-out line 1 extended permit ip any any
access-list acl-proxy remark ACCESS LIST FOR PROXY SEGMENT
access-list acl-proxy line 1 extended permit ip any any
access-list acl-wan remark ACCESS LIST FOR WAN SEGMENT
access-list acl-wan line 1 extended permit ip any any
probe tcp PROBE_5050
port 5050
interval 15
passdetect interval 60
open 1
probe tcp PROBE_5101
port 5101
interval 15
passdetect interval 60
open 1
probe tcp PROBE_TCP
port 80
interval 15
passdetect interval 60
open 1
parameter-map type http PARAMAP_CASE
case-insensitive
no persistence-rebalance
rserver host RS_BCPR01
ip address 192.168.0.103
inservice
rserver host RS_BCPR02
ip address 192.168.0.104
inservice
rserver host RT_fax1
description Right Fax Server-1
ip address 192.168.200.66
rserver host RT_fax2
description Right Fax Server-2
ip address 192.168.200.67
serverfarm host SF_BCPR
transparent
probe PROBE_5050
probe PROBE_5101
probe PROBE_TCP
rserver RS_BCPR01
inservice
rserver RS_BCPR02
inservice
serverfarm host SF_RT_fax
rserver RT_fax1
rserver RT_fax2
sticky ip-netmask 255.255.255.255 address source STICKY-SOURCE
replicate sticky
serverfarm SF_BCPR
sticky ip-netmask 255.255.255.255 address source FAX-STICKY
replicate sticky
serverfarm SF_RT_fax
class-map type management match-any CM_ALL
2 match protocol snmp any
3 match protocol http any
4 match protocol https any
5 match protocol icmp any
6 match protocol telnet any
class-map match-any CM_BYPASS_FOR_LAN
3 match virtual-address 100.1.1.0 255.255.255.0 tcp eq www
8 match virtual-address 10.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 tcp eq www
9 match virtual-address 172.16.0.0 255.255.0.0 tcp eq www
10 match virtual-address 192.168.0.0 255.255.0.0 tcp eq www
class-map match-any CM_BYPASS_SUBNET
9 match virtual-address 100.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 tcp eq www
13 match virtual-address 10.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 tcp eq www
14 match virtual-address 172.16.0.0 255.255.0.0 tcp eq www
15 match virtual-address 192.168.0.0 255.255.0.0 tcp eq www
class-map match-any CM_IM
2 match virtual-address 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 tcp eq 5050
3 match virtual-address 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 tcp eq 1080
4 match virtual-address 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 tcp eq 5101
class-map match-all CM_SF_BCPR
255 match virtual-address 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 tcp eq www
class-map match-any RT_FAX
2 match virtual-address 192.168.200.65 0.0.0.0 any
policy-map type management first-match PM_ALL
class CM_ALL
permit
policy-map type loadbalance http first-match PM_L7_BYPASS_FOR_LAN_HTTP
class class-default
forward
policy-map type loadbalance http first-match PM_L7_BYPASS_HTTP
class class-default
forward
policy-map type loadbalance first-match PM_LB_RT_FAX
class class-default
sticky-serverfarm FAX-STICKY
policy-map type loadbalance http first-match PM_LB_SF_BCPROXY
class class-default
sticky-serverfarm STICKY-SOURCE
policy-map multi-match PM_BYPASS_FOR_LAN_HTTP
class CM_BYPASS_FOR_LAN
loadbalance vip inservice
loadbalance policy PM_L7_BYPASS_FOR_LAN_HTTP
policy-map multi-match PM_BYPASS_HTTP
class CM_BYPASS_SUBNET
loadbalance vip inservice
loadbalance policy PM_L7_BYPASS_HTTP
policy-map multi-match PM_MAIN_BCPROXY
class CM_SF_BCPR
loadbalance vip inservice
loadbalance policy PM_LB_SF_BCPROXY
loadbalance vip icmp-reply active
appl-parameter http advanced-options PARAMAP_CASE
class CM_IM
loadbalance vip inservice
loadbalance policy PM_LB_SF_BCPROXY
policy-map multi-match PM_RT_FAX
class RT_FAX
loadbalance vip inservice
loadbalance policy PM_LB_RT_FAX
service-policy input PM_ALL
interface vlan 100
description FW-INSIDE CONTEXT RACK1
ip address 192.168.0.5 255.255.255.224
alias 192.168.0.11 255.255.255.224
peer ip address 192.168.0.6 255.255.255.224
mac-address autogenerate
no icmp-guard
access-group input acl-out
no shutdown
interface vlan 200
description WAN-VLAN CONTEXT RACK1
ip address 192.168.0.33 255.255.255.224
alias 192.168.0.43 255.255.255.224
peer ip address 192.168.0.34 255.255.255.224
mac-address autogenerate
access-group input acl-wan
service-policy input PM_BYPASS_HTTP
service-policy input PM_MAIN_BCPROXY
no shutdown
interface vlan 300
description ACE-INSIDE CONTEXT RACK1
ip address 192.168.0.65 255.255.255.224
alias 192.168.0.73 255.255.255.224
peer ip address 192.168.0.66 255.255.255.224
mac-address autogenerate
access-group input acl-in
service-policy input PM_BYPASS_FOR_LAN_HTTP
service-policy input PM_BYPASS_HTTP
service-policy input PM_MAIN_BCPROXY
no shutdown
interface vlan 301
description BC-VLAN CONTEXT RACK1
ip address 192.168.0.97 255.255.255.224
alias 192.168.0.107 255.255.255.224
peer ip address 192.168.0.98 255.255.255.224
mac-address autogenerate
access-group input acl-proxy
no shutdown
ft track interface TRACKING_FOR_FT_VLAN
track-interface vlan 300
peer track-interface vlan 300
priority 255
peer priority 255
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.0.1
Please help me out what i am missing. Is there any limitation on policy map or my bypass subnet list is creating problem.

I did these changes this time nothing disconnected but I am not able to do the Remote desktop on the virtual IP address. Real IP has Remote desktop enabled even VIP is not ping able for me.
rserver host RT_fax1
description Right Fax Server-1
ip address 192.168.200.66
inservice
rserver host RT_fax2
description Right Fax Server-2
ip address 192.168.200.67
inservice
serverfarm host SF_RT_fax
rserver RT_fax1
    inservice
rserver RT_fax2
    inservice
policy-map type loadbalance rdp first-match PM_LB_RT_FAX
class class-default
    serverfarm SF_RT_fax
policy-map multi-match PM_RT_FAX
class RT_FAX
    loadbalance vip inservice
    loadbalance policy PM_LB_RT_FAX
    loadbalance vip icmp-reply active
interface vlan 200
description WAN-VLAN CONTEXT RACK1
ip address 192.168.0.33 255.255.255.224
alias 192.168.0.43 255.255.255.224
peer ip address 192.168.0.34 255.255.255.224
mac-address autogenerate
access-group input acl-wan
service-policy input PM_BYPASS_HTTP
service-policy input PM_MAIN_BCPROXY
service-policy input PM_RT_FAX
no shutdown
interface vlan 300
description ACE-INSIDE CONTEXT RACK1
ip address 192.168.0.65 255.255.255.224
alias 192.168.0.73 255.255.255.224
peer ip address 192.168.0.66 255.255.255.224
mac-address autogenerate
access-group input acl-in
service-policy input PM_BYPASS_FOR_LAN_HTTP
service-policy input PM_BYPASS_HTTP
service-policy input PM_MAIN_BCPROXY
service-policy input PM_RT_FAX
no shutdown
But nothing is working for me. Please help me out. This time i didnt configure the sticky. But in real I will go with sticky and complete IP protocol will be use a VIP. Please help me out.

OAM Webgate Ip validation problem caused by load balancer...

Hi all,
In my topology, i have 5 webgates on 5 OHS web servers running in reverse proxy mode . Those web servers are behind load balancer. Since load balancer is working in proxy mode, all requests seems to be coming from load balancer vip and this prevents ip validation at webgate side . Does anybody think that it is possible to solve this issue without changing load balancer configuration..
Regards,

Hi,
Randat, how can i reconfigure ip validation against x-forwarded-for? A custom authz plugin, or only a configuration change ? I'll keep on searching on this solution, but if you can share your solution , it'll be appriciated..
Ambarishmitra, i want to use ip validation but since all requests are coming from single ip i can't distinguish client ip's, that's my problem..
Thank you both,
Regards..

Problem in Hyperion FDM Load Balance Configuration...

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for