Problem in Inbound delivery creation
Hi all,
While creating Inbound delivery for a scheduling agreement in VL31N while saving the document i am getting the following error Item does not exist. and its getting terminated.
Regards,
Ram.
Hi,
Check whether Schedule line agreement has been released or not?
Similar Messages
-
Inbound delivery creation using VL31N
Hi All,
I could find that the message type DESADV, IDoc type DELVRY01 and process code DELS is used for creation of this.
Let me know if this is correct. When i checked in my system I could not find process code DELS. Do i need to do some additional settings to get this.
What is difference between IDOC type DELVRY01 and DELVRY03. Which one should be used.
Here the ASN received is triggering inbound delivery creation.
Please let me know on this.
Regards,
ShahuHi,
Where did you check that process code in WE64?
Check in the correct set(Inbound messages).
DELVRY03 is the latest one. You should use it only.
Regards,
Ravi -
Check amount of transition stock during inbound delivery creation
I want to move stock between plans, therefore I have the following steps:
1. Stock Transfer Order (STO), e.g. 500 pieces
2. Sending plant: MIGO (GI for STO) with MT 351 to post to transition stock, e.g. 100 pieces
3. Receiving plant: Inbound Delivery with reference to STO VL31N
4. process Inbound delivery in warehouse (SAP-WM)
The question is:
During step 3, when accessing VL31N the system proposes the full order quantity (e.g. 500 pc.)
I can change the amount to any amount I like, e.g 240 pieces.
How can I tell SAP, that Inbound delivery creation is only possible for the amount
which has been posted to stock in transition (100 pieces)
I want an error/warning message in case user wants to create Inbound delivery quantity higher than the amount that has been posted to transition stock.
Any ideas?MIGO in sending Plant?
How it is possible? MIGO means, Goods receipt. This should be in Receiving plant.
Sending plant should do the PGI
MIRO in receiving plant
Billing in sending plant
Payment from Receiving palnt and clearing in sending plant
Correct me if i am wrong
Thanks -
ASN from vendor and inbound delivery creation
hi
I have a scenario where vendor sends ASN via EDI to R/3.
This inbound ASN should create an inbound delivery.
Can you please help me knowing the idoc type, message type etc which will serve my purpose.
Also the FM / Badi for inbound delivery creation.
thanks in advance,
JoHi,
Use DESADV Message type and basic type DESADV01
Use function module IDOC_INPUT_DESADV
Edited by: Chandra Shekhar Singh on Jul 5, 2011 12:39 PM -
Inbound Delivery creation in ECC6.0 through IDoc (DELVRY03.DESADV)
Inbound Delivery creation in ECC6.0 through IDoc (DELVRY03.DESADV)
From SCM ICH system Supplier creates ASN on the WEBUI & sends it ECC 6.0 using XI.
This is Proxy (DespatchedDeliveryNotification) to IDOC (DELVRY03.DESAV) scenario
But at the receiver end i.e. ECC6.0 its giving me error at Tcode WE02 as action is not supported.
Can you suggest me how to tackle this issue.
Thanks in Advance.
Regards,
N>B.Shanmukhahi,
>>>giving me error at Tcode WE02 as action is not supported.
there are many segments in delvry03 with a first field - action (like, delete, create, 001,002, etc)
check all of them as probably you're using one which is not supported
and this is the real cause of the error
you can check it like this:
open this IDOC in We19
then open action field and F4 and see if the one you use in the idoc is in F4
change the wrong one and it will work :for 100%
Regards,
Michal Krawczyk -
Problems in inbound delivery - LIPS - NOWAB
There is a problem with inbound delivery field NOWAB ''NO GOODS MOVEMENT'' This field is filled and because this isnt possible to make the goods receipt. I have two questions about this. 1- Where is comming this marked field? (Purchase order, Material Master) 2- I can take unmark this field? Would he have some solution to carry through the Goods Receipt.?
Thanks,
Gustavo NogueiraOk
-
Auto Inbound delivery creation
Hi Sapgurus,
I am trying to create Inbound delivery from Outbound delivery after it has been PGI'ed. These both are related to Intracompany STO. We have WM implemented so both of these deliveries result in TO creation and can be closed only after TO confirmations. I used SAP notes which stated to use SPED output type in output determination procedure for outbound delivery and then assign output determination procedure to delivery type. But I was not successful in getting the desired results.
Can anyone please provide me with the steps of this configuration, I may be doing wrong something somewhere.
Appreciate the help.
Thanks in advance
Manav AnandHi,
I think you are talking about stock transfer between two plants. I assume your requirement is after PGI of the replenishment delivery system should create automatic inbound delivery in second warehouse,right?
You can create inbound delivery automatically for second warehouse.I had such scenario in my previous client.I believe through some user exit you can initiate inbound delivery creation immediately.
Please check with your technical person.
Regards,
PRashant -
Issue with Message Type Triggering during Inbound Delivery Creation
Hi Experts,
Hi Experts,
Currently we are facing issue with message type triggering during inbound delivery creation:
In NACE transaction for Inbound delivery we have 3 custom output types:
Pricing Procedure Used is standard one -> E10001
Z140 Inbound Delivery Create (This should get triggered when IB delivery is created)
Z141 Inbound Delivery Change (This should get triggered when IB Delivery is changed)
Z142 Inbound Delivery Delete(This should get triggered when IB Delivery is deleted).
At present if i check delivery in VL33 -> Extras -> Delivery Output
Both Z140 and Z141 are being triggered during IB delivery creation. While it should be only Z140.
Could you please suggest that are we missing any configuration in SPRO or we need to create any custom routine (requirement) to handle this?
ThanksHi,
There is no fine-tuned control for inbound delivery messages as for Purchase order. Hence I guess to meet your above requirement, you have to go for a custom solution similar to the PO fine tune control settings.
Thanks, -
User exit to change partner for inbound delivery creation
Hello,
I have a requirement to change the partner number for
the inbound delivery creation.
I only see the USEREXIT_MOVE_FIELD_TO_LIKP but I am not sure if this is
the right user exit for this requirement.
Is there the user exit for modifying partner in the inbound delivery?
Thanks in advance,HI
There is a program with which you can find the available exits as per your requirement. You have to execute the same and give your transaction code. Hope this helps...
*& Report ZFINDUSEREXIT
report zfinduserexit.
tables : tstc, tadir, modsapt, modact, trdir, tfdir, enlfdir.
tables : tstct.
data : jtab like tadir occurs 0 with header line.
data : field1(30).
data : v_devclass like tadir-devclass.
parameters : p_tcode like tstc-tcode obligatory.
select single * from tstc where tcode eq p_tcode.
if sy-subrc eq 0.
select single * from tadir where pgmid = 'R3TR'
and object = 'PROG'
and obj_name = tstc-pgmna.
move : tadir-devclass to v_devclass.
if sy-subrc ne 0.
select single * from trdir where name = tstc-pgmna.
if trdir-subc eq 'F'.
select single * from tfdir where pname = tstc-pgmna.
select single * from enlfdir where funcname =
tfdir-funcname.
select single * from tadir where pgmid = 'R3TR'
and object = 'FUGR'
and obj_name eq enlfdir-area.
move : tadir-devclass to v_devclass.
endif.
endif.
select * from tadir into table jtab
where pgmid = 'R3TR'
and object = 'SMOD'
and devclass = v_devclass.
select single * from tstct where sprsl eq sy-langu and
tcode eq p_tcode.
format color col_positive intensified off.
write:/(19) 'Transaction Code - ',
20(20) p_tcode,
45(50) tstct-ttext.
skip.
if not jtab[] is initial.
write:/(95) sy-uline.
format color col_heading intensified on.
write:/1 sy-vline,
2 'Exit Name',
21 sy-vline ,
22 'Description',
95 sy-vline.
write:/(95) sy-uline.
loop at jtab.
select single * from modsapt
where sprsl = sy-langu and
name = jtab-obj_name.
format color col_normal intensified off.
write:/1 sy-vline,
2 jtab-obj_name hotspot on,
21 sy-vline ,
22 modsapt-modtext,
95 sy-vline.
endloop.
write:/(95) sy-uline.
describe table jtab.
skip.
format color col_total intensified on.
write:/ 'No of Exits:' , sy-tfill.
else.
format color col_negative intensified on.
write:/(95) 'No User Exit exists'.
endif.
else.
format color col_negative intensified on.
write:/(95) 'Transaction Code Does Not Exist'.
endif.
at line-selection.
get cursor field field1.
check field1(4) eq 'JTAB'.
set parameter id 'MON' field sy-lisel+1(10).
<b>Do reward if useful...</b>
Regards
Dinesh -
Inbound Delivery Creation Problem with multiple batches
I would appreciate if you can guide me if there is any BAPI or FM to create the inbound delivery (VL31N) with the multiple purchase orders and with the multiple batches for the materials.
Regards
PrasadTRY THIS ONE.
BAPI_INB_DELIVERY_CONFIRM_DEC
*& Report ZZ_BAPI_OUTB_DELIVERY_CONF_DEC
REPORT ZZ_BAPI_OUTB_DELIVERY_CONF_DEC.
data HEADER_DATA like BAPIOBDLVHDRCON.
data HEADER_CONTROL like BAPIOBDLVHDRCTRLCON.
data DELIVERY like BAPIOBDLVHDRCON-DELIV_NUMB.
data HANDLING_UNIT_HEADER_CROSS type table of BAPIDLVHDUNHDR.
data gs_HANDLING_UNIT_HEADER_CROSS type BAPIDLVHDUNHDR.
data RETURN type table of BAPIRET2.
parameters:
* Delivery number
p_deliv like BAPIOBDLVHDRCON-DELIV_NUMB default '0080015271',
* External Handling Unit Identifikation
p_hunr like BAPIDLVHDUNHDR-HDL_UNIT_EXID default '60000000000000000000',
* Handling Unit Material Number
p_humat like BAPIDLVHDUNHDR-SHIP_MAT default '000000000000002387'.
* Work on clean data. Allways.
clear:
header_data,
header_control,
delivery,
gs_HANDLING_UNIT_HEADER_CROSS.
refresh:
HANDLING_UNIT_HEADER_CROSS.
* set data values
header_data-DELIV_NUMB = p_deliv.
header_control-DELIV_NUMB = p_deliv.
delivery = p_deliv.
gs_HANDLING_UNIT_HEADER_CROSS-DELIV_NUMB = p_deliv.
gs_HANDLING_UNIT_HEADER_CROSS-HDL_UNIT_EXID = p_hunr.
gs_HANDLING_UNIT_HEADER_CROSS-SHIP_MAT = p_humat.
append
gs_HANDLING_UNIT_HEADER_CROSS
to
HANDLING_UNIT_HEADER_CROSS.
* Call Function
CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_OUTB_DELIVERY_CONFIRM_DEC'
EXPORTING
HEADER_DATA = header_data
HEADER_CONTROL = header_control
DELIVERY = p_deliv
TABLES
RETURN = return
HANDLING_UNIT_HEADER_CROSS = HANDLING_UNIT_HEADER_CROSS
commit work.
write: 'Finished'.
Edited by: pradeepvonti kumar on Nov 19, 2009 5:46 PM
Edited by: pradeepvonti kumar on Nov 19, 2009 5:48 PM -
Confirmation control key check for inbound delivery creation
Hi,
Currently, in the Client's company, the process of receiving goods from purchase orders looks like that (SAP-wise):
- create a purchase order,
- receive goods using MIGO and automatically create an inbound delivery,
- pack the delivery and post goods receipt.
Recently, some patches have been installed, including one described by note 1602047 (which basically enforces checking confirmation control keys if goods receipt assignment and goods receipt relevance are activated for inbound deliveries). Note says that it only affects two-step stock transfer and creation of automatic inbound deliveries using SPED output but it seems it also affects other basic processes like PO receipt in MIGO.
Now, when using the old control key (that had MRP-Relevant and GR-Relevant fields checked), the system is unable to automatically create an inbound delivery after the goods receipt is posted with MIGO (with message VL148 - Not possible to create an inbound delivery). I learned that this is because the "GR Assignment" field must be checked in the confirmation control key so it's possible to automatically create aninbound delivery after receiving a purchase order in MIGO.
After changing the confirmation control key to have the missing field checked it's not possible anymore to receive goods from PO in MIGO as the PO requires shipping notification in order to be processed in MIGO thus requiring of manual creation of an inbound delivery.
Is there any way to skip this check so the process would remain the same (this model has been working fine for few years in the Client's system) and the inbound delievery would be created automatically after posting the receipt in MIGO?
Thanks in advance,
PiotrHi,
don't know if you found a solution, but we received the following message from SAP:
The advent of the new version requires some attention to the users. It
was necessary to avoid inconsistencies which in the past version the
system was susceptible.
Main Program SAPMM07M
Source code of MM07MLVS
sy-msgid VL sy-msgty E sy-msgno 148
I have checked the process and through debugged I could confirm the
following information SAP is providing to all similar incidents reportedfor us:
Error message VL 148 is issued if in the confirmation control key used
in the purchase order, the fields for MRP-relevance (T163G-KZDIS),
GR relevance (T163G-WEREL) and GR assignment indicator (T163G-WEZUO)
are not set.
The correction of note 1602047 was necessary to avoid inconsistencies
(table EKES) in the purchase order. Without having the GR assignment
(T163G-WEZUO) set, there is no unique reference created between the
purchase order history (table EKBE) and the inbound delivery
confirmation (table EKES) at goods receipt which leads to a problem if
several inbound deliveries exist for the same purchase order.
If you set T163G-WEZUO to 'X', this assures that, for an inbound
delivery, the confirmation record (EKES) belonging to this inbound
delivery (EKES-VBELN) is also accurately updated at goods receipt.
How to solve the issue?
Use a confirmation control key with the GR assignment indicator set
and then create the inbound delivery with VL31N. If you want to be able
to create the inbound delivery with reference to a certain line item in
the PO, use transaction VL34.
If you still want to use transaction MIGO, there is the following
workaround:
- Create a purchase order without any confirmation control key
- Create a goods receipt (GR) in transaction MIGO with reference to this PO and post the GR to a non-HU-managed storage location
- Create a transfer posting with MIGO using movement type 311 to
transfer the goods from the non-HU-managed storage location to the
HU-managed storage location.
As the transfer posting is an additional step for the user, the whole
process could be automated using a partner storage location
(T001l-PARLG) for the GR which then triggers (through a modification)
the BAPI 'BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE' to create the transfer posting without
user interaction.
I hope to have satisfied you on the reason why it is now happening and
also I believe you can explain to business that it is a new behavior
necessary done from SAP side to avoid worse situations, we are aware of
potential dissatisfaction it might cause. SAP Support is always
available to clarify any issue.
Sorry for not having a more positive answer.
I hope it helps!
Leentje -
Inbound delivery creation in STO via EDI/Idoc
Hello experts,
My requirement is like this:-
Stock transfer order is created for supplying plant 2000 & receiving plant 2010.
When the supplying plant 2000 posts an outbound delivery & PGI, at same time an Inbound delivery should be created in receiving plant 2010.
I know theoretically that this is achieved by making confirmation settings & output types. But don't know exactly how to configure it.
Can you please mention the process?
I have referred the scn threads:
Outbound Delivery to Inbound delivery by using IDOC
how to configure the message control for DESADV
SAP note 111903
Receiving Vendor Confirmations via EDI - Purchasing (MM-PUR) - SAP Library
But there is lack of clarity from my side.You do not need to use EDI messages to get an inbound delivery created when a PGI is done on the outbound delivery.
Search for the config on the SPED output type. This SPED output message can be triggered during the PGI which results in the creation of an inbound delivery in the receiving plant.
The receiving plant will have to maintain the confirmation control key 0004 at item level in the purchasing document.
Link to SAP help Automatic Creation of Inbound Delivery - Transfer and Inventory Management - SAP Library
Refer SAP note 1119073 point 3 and note 965176
Regards, -
Inbound delivery Creation(ASN) Process
Hi All,
Plz give end to end Process for creation Inbound delivery(ASN) No.
why should we take conformation control key in PO and not shipment notification tab there
thanks,
sunil sahooConfig:
go to SPRO-MM-purchasing-Confirmation-setup confirmation control
here select the 10 and check the check box Create inb delivery
then select the line and click on the confirmation seq and make GR relevant, MRP relevant and GR assign (all three box checked)
Process Flow: -
1. ME21N - In PO, Confirmation Tab, select the confirmation control key as "Shipping Notification" or "Inbound Delivery"
2. VL31N - Create Inbound Delivery w.r.t. PO
3. MIGO - Goods Receipt > Inbound Delivery
If you dont select the conformation control key in the PO than system wont allow you to create the Inbound delivery agianst thePO. -
Inbound delivery creation in WM - mapping to process type 1011 in EWM
Hi All,
I am new to EWM and have to configure handling units for picking and putaway in EWM.
I am creating an inbound delivery w.r.t Purchase order in WM and passing it to EWM. During the warehouse order creation I am packing the materials in a packing material. however, the warehouse process type is 1010 and I want it to relflect 1011.
So I wanted to know how to configure the system either on the WM or the EWM side so that when the inbound delivery is received on the EWM side it maps it to process 1011.
ArupHi,
To put across my question more clearly here is where I am right now. I pass the delivery to the EWM side. There I pack the materials. There is a HU association with the packing material.
When I go to the screen with the follow on functions- warehouse task. Then when I choose the handling unit tab and click on the exectute button associated with the Whouse Req then there should be a Line item displaying the handling unit that was created in the previous step.
However this is not happening and when I click on the execute button the line item does not show up.
So I was wondering if there is some configuration that needs to be done to get the HU displayed?
Arup -
IDoc or BAPI for inbound delivery creation with reference to PO.
Hi
I have requirement to create a inbound delivery, I will get a ASN from external system with PO, Vendor Material number & batch. I want to know is there any BAPI or IDoc that can be used to create inbound delivery in R/3. I used BBP_INB_DELIVERY_CREATE to create inbound delivery and I was successful but problem is that inbound delivery was not updated with Vendor Material number & Batch. Can some one suggest me any other BAPI or IDoc ?
Thanks in advance
Nagendra P Boggarapu
Edited by: Nagendra P Boggarapu on May 6, 2010 4:06 PMUse Delvry0* IDOC.
Reddy
Maybe you are looking for
-
i lost my iPhone. i got a new one, how can i back up all the contacts i had in the old one (iPhone 4S). When i go to Itunes it start as a new iphone.
-
Install Oracel 9.2.0.1 Client on Win XP Pro SP 2, Pentium 4 machine
Hello, Please help me solve problem in installing Oracel client. I install Oracel 9.2.0.1 client on PC has following configure: Win XP Profesional SP 2 Intel Pentium 4 RAM 256 KB Disk space >10 GB At step : choose Install Type: Administrator, Runtime
-
How to extract data from Oracle Table to an Oracle XMLtype field
All, I'm very new with ODI and I'm looking for a way to implement the following scenario: I have the Oracle table A, already mapped to Data Model A. This table has the following fields: field X (PK) field Y field Z field W I have a table B, already m
-
HT1947 I can't connect my iPhone to my iTunes using the Remote app
I've looked at all the instructional help threads, done everything multiple times and when I connect my iPhone to iTunes, it still doesn't work. The Remote app icon doesn't show up under devices in iTunes. I have tried to reconfigure my iTunes settin
-
Hi All, I have created a remote enabled function module. Based on the import parameter value , values are populated in the internal table of the export parameter ( which has no of recortds). The RFC works as expected. But when i do the syntax check,