Problem In infostructure S002

Hi,
For Infostructure S002, when I check in MC62, the field "Division" is disabled. What needs to be done to enable this field.
Please let me know
Thanks,
Sandeep

Have you tried rebooting the tablet? How often do you get those errors? Is it only after you use the camera? Does the camera work?
- Peter

Similar Messages

Billing Qty by Sales office and Sales group (LIS)

Hello!
I am running the report MC-E, I want to see there (or at another report of LIS) the ratio Billing Quantity, but shown by Sales office and/or by Sales group, could anybody help me?
Thank you in advance
Regards

Hello Enrique
You may add key figure 'Billing Quantity' to standard Infostructure S002 or add characteristics "Sales Office' or 'Sales Group' to Infostructure S001.
Or if you don't want to tamper with standard delivered, copy S001 or S002 and create custom Infostructure ( S500+) with the requisite characteristics and key figures.
Hope this helps.

Infostructure update routine : debug problem

Hi All,
We have created three update routines for three corresponding infostructures. But I am not able to debug this routine. I tried to put a hard breakpoint also, but it was of no use. The Infostructure logs the changes in the sales order.
How can I get the list of objects that are accessible in these routines?
How can I view the values of MCVBAP and MCVBAK(communication structures) that are used in the update routines?
How can I debug such routines?
From where does these structures, MCVBAK and MCVBAP, get value? Are these runtime values? How much time does it take normally take for the infostructure to be updated? or is it updated immediately when the sales Order is saved?
Thanks,
Jiten

Hello,
some hopefully helpful answers:
- the MCVBAK / MCVBAP are structures, that are built from the orderdata in the function MCV_STATISTICS_ORDER. There are two exits EXIT_SAPLMCS1_001 (header Data) and EXIT_SAPLMCS1_002 (position data) where you could fill additional user fields in these structures. Additional fields you could define in the structures MCVBAKUSR or MCVABPUSR.
- the time that it takes to get an infostructure updates depends on it's customizing of updating (transaction OM01). the possibilities are: no update, update in V1-posting, update in V2-posting, update in batch.
- Helpful are folling transactions: MC30 ( shows the update logs, you have to set the parameter MCL = 'X' in your userdate, see OSS - Note 77427) , MCVR (simulation of update).
Regards Wolfgang

Problem filling Arch infostructure for COPA2_S001 - field catalog?

I'm not sure I'm posting this ti the correct forum, but I'll give it a try.
Archivingobject COPA2_S001 is used to archive Copa data (account based CoPa). As the profitability analysis archiving objects depend on the operating concern (generated by the customer), and must also be generated, no appropriate information structures or field catalogs can be delivered as standard with the Archive Information System (SAP AS). You must create these yourself.
This was set up by somenone in the pst, but the Infostructue (the table cretaed for it) stays empty.
The Infostructure is activated, the archiving process shows no errors and even the status info from the AIS shows only green lights!
My guess that the field catalog which was set up is not correct.
Can anyone give my some info how to be sure what the cause, how to solve it and how to fill the AIS without starting a new archiving run.
Thanks in advance!
Ger

Sorry misread the message.
Kind regards,
Robert Loeffen
Message was edited by:
M. van Lieshout

Problem with posting free goods delivery

I need some help,
when I'm posting the goods issue in VL02N I'm receiving following error:
<i>Item   Material           Description                                   Delivery qty UoM Batch
000001 XAK 256 N50 CB P35 CN UR V35/ AUTOALARM DOG 50                             1 ST
       E KO 014
Order 2000574 cannot carry revenues</i>
First I don't know why the order no is 2000574 when the delivery was done to order 2065030645, but it's not a problem to me, the problem is why I'm getting the error 'the order cannot carry revenues' because the delivery is made to an free goods order and the order has values of 0 in pricing conditions.
Looking forward to reciving some help
regards,
Martin

Hi Marcin
Check the following:
Free Goods
Also referred as discount in kind. Business can consider to offer discount not in monetary terms but in the form of free goods, ie goods provided without any charge when a particular quantity of material is purchased by the Customer. SAP provides two methods:
a)     Inclusive
b)     Exclusive
IMGSDBasic functionsFree Goods
Condition technique for free goods
Select maintain Pricing procedure
Standard procedure
Copy as ur Pricing procedure
Copy all
Save
The Pricing procedure contains the Condition Type as NA00free goods
NA00 has the Access sequence as NA00
Select activate free goods determination
Assign the procedure to sales areas using document procedure and customer procedure
Select your sales area and assign
S002      SB     SX          A     1     ZA0001
Save
A= Document Procedure (determined based on doc)
1= Customer procedure (Determined from customer master)
We have to maintain free goods condition records
SAP menuLogisticsSDMaster dataConditionsFree GoodsVBN1 Create
Discount type: NA00
Continue
Enter sales org, distribution channel and Customer
By default the entry screen is for Inclusive, Select Exclusive button to maintain Condition Record for Exclusive
Inclusive: Continue, as it is to maintain the record
Material: Product ID
Min Qty: Minimum qty required to be ordered (10)
From: From how many units free goods are considered ie 10
Unit=Unit of measurement of ordered product
Are free Goods: quantity free
Add= The unit of measurement of free goods item
Calculation: 1 Prorata
save
What is the other requirement?
The pricing procedure should contain the Condition type R100 that is free goods condition type. This condition type in the Procedure has requirement as 55
(55 means only if the item is free goods then only value of R100 to be used in the calculation. Value= controlled by Alt condition base value 28 which states that discount should be 100%)
Check whether your pricing procedure is created from scratch then you have to maintain the Condition type R100, requirement as 55 and altcbv= 28
If you have copied from RVAA01 there is no need to maintain R100, as it is already available
Create the order
Ordered qty is split into two items
M1               30 Pcs
This will be split as
M1          27---Item cat TANregular pricing
M1          3Item cat as TANN eligible for 100% disc
How the item category is determined
Main item:
Z1OR + NORM+TAN
Sub item
Z1ORNORM Usage= Free + Higher level item cat as TAN= TANN as sub item Item category
Exclusive
VBN1
Select Exclusive
The screen fields are same as inclusive except here there is a provision to add the material number of free good material, which is different from the material ordered. If left blank system takes both as same material
Reward if useful to u

Error while Transporting Custom Infostructure

Hi All,
I had created a Custom Infostructure S503 and then move it to quality system.
Later on i had replace one key figure field and regenerate the info structure and also change update rule for new field.
Due to this changes all the earlier records from underlying table S503 gets deleted.
Also there are some records in quality System.
My problem is, when i am transporting the udated infor structure to quality system, its fail to do so
its shows me following error.
Post-import method MCS_METHOD_INFO_GENER started for MCIN L, date and time: 20090604083743
Date: 04.06.09, time: 08:37:43, generated by: DDIC, client 000
Table generator started
Table S503 has been saved
Message from the Data Dictionary:
Activation was interrupted
An error occured during generation of information structure S503.
There are no entries in the log
Errors occurred during post-handling MCS_METHOD_INFO_GENER for MCIN L
MCS_METHOD_INFO_GENER belongs to package MCS
The errors affect the following components:
LO-LIS-DC (Data Collection)
Post-import method MCS_METHOD_INFO_GENER completed for MCIN L, date and time: 20090604083743
Please advice how to resolve this error.
Thanks and Regards
Sunil

Solution : SAP Note 115538 - Changing of self-defined info structures MC22

AS_API_READ problem in archiving

Dear experts,
Recently i worked on one of archiving retrieval scenario where standard infoobject is SAP_FI_DOC_002.
I fetched data from BSEG,BKPF,WITH_ITEM using archiving FMs ARCHIVE_READ_OBJECT,ARCHIVE_GET_NEXT_RECORD.
Everything is going fine from retrieval point of view.Problem is performance.
Reason why its happening is as below:
CALL FUNCTION 'AS_API_READ'
    EXPORTING
      i_fieldcat                      = 'SAP_FI_DOC_002'
      i_selections                    = gt_selection[]
*   I_OBLIGATORY_FIELDS             =
*   I_MAXROWS                       =
   IMPORTING
      e_result                        = gt_result.
* EXCEPTIONS
*   PARAMETERS_INVALID              = 1
*   NO_INFOSTRUC_FOUND              = 2
*   FIELD_MISSING_IN_FIELDCAT       = 3
*   OTHERS                          = 4
IF sy-subrc <> 0.
* MESSAGE ID SY-MSGID TYPE SY-MSGTY NUMBER SY-MSGNO
*         WITH SY-MSGV1 SY-MSGV2 SY-MSGV3 SY-MSGV4.
ENDIF.
In this FM ,if i provide selection field say 'BUKRS' 'GJAHR' 'BUDAT' 'BSTAT' .
Since only BUKRS GJAHR BUDAT lies in fieldcatalog of infostructure and BSTAT is an optional field,
so i get all possible combination of BSAT though i may be requiring less records.
It also adds to performance issue as i am not able provide correct index criteria.
This is a simple example.In my overall report i am facing this issue at many places where whole
data is getting retrieved.
How can i solve this problem. ?
I do not want to convert SAP_FI_DOC_002 to Z_SAP_FI_DOC_002 and do activation or deactivation because
i feel using a custom infostructure with standard reports atlast may invite other issues.
How to deal with this in abap . ?

Hi,
File adapter has the functionality which support the empty file handling.
Handling of Empty Files
Specify how empty files (length 0 bytes) are to be handled.
○ Do Not Create Message
No XI messages are created from empty files.
The files are processed according to the selected Processing Mode.
For example, if the processing mode is Delete, empty files are deleted in the source directory.
○ Process Empty Files
XI messages are created with an empty main payload.
The files are processed according to the selected Processing Mode.
○ Skip Empty Files
No XI messages are created from empty files.
Empty files are skipped and remain in the source directory.
refer the belwo link:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/ae/d03341771b4c0de10000000a1550b0/frameset.htm
reward points if helpful*
thanks
SAPXI

What is the best design pattern for this problem?

No code to go with the question. I am trying to settle on the best design pattern for the problem before I code. I want to use an Object Oriented approach.
I have included a basic UML diagram of what I was thinking so far.
Stated simply, I have three devices; Module, Wired Modem, and Wireless Modem.
In the Device Under Test parent class, I have put the attributes that are variable from device to device, but common to all of them.
In the child classes, I have put the attributes that are not variable to each copy of that device. The attributes are common across device types. I was planning to use controls in the class definition that have the data set to a default value, since it doesn't change for each serial number of that device. For example, a Module will always have a Device Type ID of 1. These values are used to query the database.
An example query would be [DHR].[GetDeviceActiveVersions] '39288', 1, '4/26/2012 12:18:52 PM'
The '1' is the device type ID, the 39288 is the serial number, and the return would be "A000" or "S002", for example.
So, I would be pulling the Serial Number and Device Type ID from the Device Under Test parent and child, and passing them to the Database using a SQL string stored in the control of the Active Versions child class of Database.
The overall idea is that the same data is used to send multiple queries to the database and receiving back various data that I then evaluate for pass of fail, and for date order.
What I can't settle on is the approach. Should it be a Strategy pattern, A Chain of Command pattern, a Decorator pattern or something else.
Ideas?

elrathia wrote:
Hi Ben,
I haven't much idea of how override works and when you would use it and why. I'm the newest of the new here.
Good. At least you will not be smaking with a OPPer dOOPer hammer if I make some gramatical mistake.
You may want to look at this thread in the BreakPoint where i trie to help Cory get a handle on Dynamic Dispatching with an example of two classes that inherit from a common parent and invoke Over-ride VIs to do the same thing but with wildly varying results.
The example uses a Class of "Numeric" and a sibling class "Text" and the both implement an Add method.
It is dirt simple and Cory did a decent job of explaining it.
It just be the motivation you are looking for.
have fun!
Ben
Ben Rayner
I am currently active on.. MainStream Preppers
Rayner's Ridge is under construction

*URGENT* Problem in SOP

Dear gurus,
We face a very urgent problem in our Sales & Operations Planning, any help is greatly appreciated.
We created a planningtype based on an underlying infostructure. (trx MC8A)
The problem we now have is that some numbers that we see in the infostructure table (using trx SE16), do not appear in the planningtype with trx MC94/MC95.
How is this possible??
Thanks for your thoughts!
Rgds, AJ

Problem solved itself. As always: masterdata..!

Problems with running BAPI   BAPI_SALESORDER_CREATEFROMDAT2

Hi all,
I’ve got a problem running BAPIs in SD invironment.
I’m creating contract releases in SD via BAPI.
First I run BAPI BAPISORDER_GETDETAILEDLIST in my program to get detaildata of the contract.
Then I run the BAPI   BAPI_SALESORDER_CREATEFROMDAT2 filled with contract reference data and in addition with order data to create the contract release.This works properly so far. On both sides in the contract and in he contract release I find the correct document flow. Means: in document flow of the contract I find all the releases created . Also I find the contract in the documentflow of the releases.
But…something does not work: In the contract the released values are not updated. When I create a release manually, the release values are accumulated in the contract in field ‘value released’ under flag ‘item detail’. But this does not work, when the leases are created via BAPI. However I checked several parameters in the BAPIS but I cannot find something that leads to an update .
Can somebody help me and can tell me what is to be done to get this field updated? Thanks in advance.
same in German...
Ich habe ein Problem mit BAPIs im SD.
Ich erzeuge Abrufe zum Kontrakt im SD mittels BAPIs.
Zuerst lasse ich den BAPI BAPISORDER_GETDETAILEDLIST laufen, um mittels Kontraktnummer alle Daten zum Kontrakt zu bekommen. Dann lasse ich den BAPI   BAPI_SALESORDER_CREATEFROMDAT2 gefüllt mit SD-Abrufdaten und den Referenzdaten des Kontraktes laufen Dies funktioniert soweit sehr gut. Sowohl im Kontrakt als auch im Abruf sind jeweils die übergeordneten bzw. untergeordneten Vertiebsbelege zu sehen. Die Referenz wird also hergestellt. Jedoch wird im Kontrakt nicht die Abrufwerte aufsummiert. Normalerweise wird bei manueller Erstellung der Abrufe im Kontrakt die jeweilgen abgerufenen Werte gegen den Kontraktwert aufsummiert (Feld abgerufene Werte im Kontrakt unter Reiter ‚Positionsdetail‘. Ich habe alle möglichen Parameter im BAPI geprüft und getestet aber nichts gefunden, was mir die abgerufenen Werten aufsummiert.
Kann mir dazu einen Tip geben, was ich tun kann, damit auch die Werte richtig referenzieren ? Danke im Voraus.

the usage of exactly this BAPIs in the way I described is in according to SAP note 370988.
BAPI_SALES_DEL_SCHEDULE_CREATE ist for SD schedule agreements and not for SD contracts and does not offer Input parameters for e.g. adding price conditions what is needed for my task.
The field in contract I mentioned e.g. in Transaction VA42 VA43 is filled / gets its Information out of Infostructure/table S135. The BAPI seems not be able to fill this structure while creating the contract release.
I'm looking for example an input parameter I did not found already or any other option that leads to an update of infostructure S135 while creating/posting a release via BAPI.

Search Help Problem - Passing parameter between to search helps.

I created following 2 table for entering data in PO screen using ME21N using Custom Data Tab.
ZSTATE_TAB - State table (has elementary search help ZSTATE_SH - Value of SCODE is exported)
SCode(Key)     Description
S001           New York
S002          Virginia
S003          West Virginia
ZCITY_TAB - City Table (has elementary search help     ZCITY_SH - Value of SCODE is imported)
SCode(Key)     CCode (Key)     Description          Level
S001          C001          New York City          L001
S001          C002          Rochester          L002
S001          C003          Buffalo               L003
S002          C004          Richmond          L029
S002          C005          Fairfax               L030
I have created an custom input field LEVEL in t-code ME21N in Customer Data Tab.
I want to create search help for LEVEL using import parameter STATE & CITY .
On selection screen of search help two selection parameters STATE and CITY are displayed.
Step 1:User press F4 for getting list of state and selects any state using search help ZSTATE_SH (Value of SCODE is exported)
Step 2:User press F4 to get the list of City using search help ZCITY_SH, based on state selected in Step 1. (Value of SCODE is imported)
In Step 2, I want to see only the cities selected in Step 1. But instead all Cities are displayed in hit list.
I also created a table maintenance program SM30 for ZCITY_TAB, the search help ZCITY_SH is correctly displaying the data in hit list according to the State selected in ZSTATE_SH.
But it is not displaying the correct list for cites in ME21N.
Kindly help me in fixing this problem.
Thanks in advance.

here is the answer from [sap library - Value Transport for Input Helps - Parametrizing the Import Parameters of the Search Help|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/35/bdb6e2c48411d1950800a0c929b3c3/frameset.htm] :
If the search help is attached to the table field ( Attaching to Table Fields) or to the check table of the field ( Attaching to Tables), a value transport can take place for all the screen fields that are linked with a parameter of the search help.

Problem with Self defined info structure.

Hi All,
We have Create some Self define Info structure Like ;--
S061 Location and Planning               --->S501
S062 object class and manufacturer --->S502
S063 Danage analysis                        --->S503
S065 Object Statistics                         --->S504
But probleme is when we excute S501 self defined info structure heading comes as
Standard Analysis for Info Sstructure S501: Selection where as in Standard it is coming as Location Analysis: Selection
Any one can tell how can i solve this probleme.
Thanks
Vinit

steps to create own infostructure by copying standard infostructure.
steps.... 1) First Create your own info structure using menu path SPRO> Logistics general > LIS > Logistics data warehouse > Data basis > information structure > maintain self defined ino structure Here create a New stucture called S901 (Follow Custom defined structure naming conventions) for application 07, by copying S115 .
Once inside this Choose the Charateristic button below and CHOOSE SELECTION LIST.
This will popup a list of fields that can be added to the structure for analysis per field catalogue.
Navigate to the notification Object field catalog to select the Order number.
Select other field as appropriate from other field catalog and copy them.Then select or de-select the "Key figures" thats relevant for your needs Check ,generate and activate the same structure and save.
2) Create Update rules for updating this info structure by copying the rules of S115.
SPRO> Logistics general > LIS > Logistics data warehouse > Data basis >Updating > Specific definition using update Rules > Maintain update rules.
Enter the newly created Structure name and choose teh Update group 26 (use drop down) and enter the S115 and 26 as teh group and rules to copy from.
Delete the rules thats not relevant for your needs and then check, and Choose "generate: and then activate the "UPDATING" and save.
3) Activate the Update type for the new structure. SPRO> Logistics general > LIS > Logistics data warehouse > Data basis >Updating > Update Control > Activate Update.
Choose PM and double click on the new structure that you had just created and chosoe Period and Type of updating (2: Similar to other standard info structures). and save.
This should start updating New orders that you are creating from Now on.
However if you would like to pre-populate existing data in this structure for analysis, then you would have to run through the generation program in background for this specific structure.
SPRO> Logistics general > LIS > Logistics data warehouse > Data basis >tools > setup of statistical data >Application specific setup of statistical data > perform setup - PM.
Here make sure to do the PMIS statistical setup (This might be redundant, if you havent changed any value category that updates PMCO table) and Set Up: Plant Maintenance IS(Make sure to choose your specific structure).
You should be able to check the table entries to confirm that the program has updated the table (Name of the info structure).
The defaulted version could be different from the standard version (000).You could copy the data from one verion to another version using the first step in this block.
Once the genration is complete you should be ready to use this structure using MCIS transaction (PMIS > Standard analysis > User defined analysis).
This will list out all the user defined structures and you can pick and execute the one that you had just created.
Regards
Dhiren
Edited by: Dhiren Kumar Sahoo on Feb 2, 2010 3:55 PM

Accessing InfoStructure S900/S901

Hi All,
I Want to access the InfoStructure S900/S901 to develop a report. Can anyone help me on this regard??
regards,
buddhika
Moderator message: please start working on it and come back with specific problems if required, but always search for available information before posting.
Edited by: Thomas Zloch on May 11, 2011 9:57 AM

>
SDW wrote:
> I know that when you go into MM03 and view materail master changes they pull up really quickly. Is this program hitting something else rather than the CDHDR and CDPOS tables? How do they pull up so quickly even if there are many changes.
>
That's the beauty of having the option to debug a program. Wondering how SAP reads the data fast: go debug!

Emptying archive infostructure: report AS_AINDDEL_DATE

Dear all,
In order to delete the infostructures from object MM_MATBEL, I use the report AS_AINDDEL_DATE.
The program is run in background.
However the program run for 100 hours for one year and for 10 hours for one archiving run (one date).
Archiving started on 2002 and this is the first time we are trying to delete infostructures.
Did you already have performance problems while emptying infostructures ?
Best regards,

I am not sure why you want to empty the info structures, but if i want to empty the info structures then i would use tcode SARI-->Status-->status per info structure-->delete info structures. This would be much faster to empty the info structures.
AS_AINDDEL_DATE this report is slow because it has to get the specific date and get to delete the archived information from the structures. You can use this report only if you have a requirement to delete the info structures for a particular date.

SIS Infostructure show duplicate records after running oli7, oli8, oli9

Hi,
I ran oli7, oli8, oli9 on my relevant sales documents as some infostructure were not getting update. i selected the sales document for specific dates and then enter those document start and end number in these Tcodes.
lets say : old data in sis infostrctre was for dates 01-Jan-10 to 08-Jan-10
data missing for days: 08-Jan-10 to 16-Jan-10 (some of documents from 8th Jan was missing)
now when i ran it on documents for dates 8-Jan-10 to 116-Jan-10, the data in that info structure was duplicated for date 8-Jan-10 (meaning that all previous data which was already in that info structure was duplicated).
Can any1 pls guide me how to eradicate that error.
Thanks.

with olix we deleted the version of update which we created through oli7,oli8 & oli9. and then reexecuted the update tcode with correct date options...thus the problem was resolved.

Problem In infostructure S002

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for