Problem in Intercompany Transactions

Hi Gurus
I used 'IC Transaction Tasks' as stated in http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/middleware/financial-management/tutorials/mictrans-094190.html
I'm able to see the data reflected in the data grid but when I choose "Consolidate All With Data" at the first common parent, the Intercompany transaction is not eliminated(Not showing zeroes).
Please help me understand and fix this. Thanks in advance.

Hi,
As far as i understand,
you have 3 entities considered in this example: Europe, Italy and france(Italy and France are tagged as ICP entities)
Tell me one thing- is Europe the Immediate parent of both the entities: France and Italy
Suggest you to Look at tghe Value dimension for this.
In case : Europe is Immediate parent of both Entities,
their intercompany amounts values will come to Ent Currency of value dimension
Elimination will happen at Elimination at these entities itself
and 0 contribution will be done for both these entities
In case : Europe is Not the Immediate parent of both Entities,
their intercompany amounts values will come to Ent Currency of value dimension
Elimination will happen directly at their first common parent
and contribution values will be there at France and Europe instead of Elimination values
Just look out the scenario you are in.... and check the value dimension members to see the elimination of ICP transactions..
I hope this helps...
get back for some more if needed
J

Similar Messages

  • Intercompany Transaction Flow Set-up when O/U's are not different

    I am seeking to know if it is possible, using I/M Intercompany Transaction Flow, to use the same O/U for start and end O/U? I can get the record into the system with same O/U's, but am denied nodes and the ability to use Intercompany Relations.
    My company currently relies on using the MTL_INTERCOMPANY_PARAMETERS record to point to the I/C CCID wherein seg6 contains the Intercompany segment of the g/L account. Understand, this is a customized method.
    The problem we are experiencing is the ship from customer is under the same O/U as the sold from. However, this is a differnet company legally and needs to be processesed as Intercompany.
    I think the answer is self-evident in the Oracle forms as to what is allowed or not, but perhaps there is something I am overlooking to allow me to utilize the function.

    Hi EMSS,
    When you say intercompnay transactions, do you mean IR-ISO?
    We can create an IR and ISO both in same opearting unit. The whole setup is same as any other IR-ISO except for the setup in Intercompany transaction flow. Process wise, its exactly same upto ISO shipment and costing the material transactions.However, we will not be having any intercompany AR or AP invoices generated. The accounts are netted out. (we are using this in one of requiremetns and we are in R12.1.3. I am not sure from which version this is available)
    Coming to accounting transactions - we used SLA for hitting the right accounts as requried by business.
    Note: We cannot have any logical intercompany transactions within same OU.
    Regards,
    G V Ranjith

  • Error while loading intercompany transactions

    Hi, I use Hyperion Financial Management 9.2.0.3 with Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.1.0. When i try to load intercompany transaction from file, the running task end in 'aborted' status. Also, the packages Application_name_ict_load and Application_name_ict_pkg in the scheme are invalid. What anyone could advise to me? Does anyone encounter this problem?

    have you checked the Task Audit log? I got that error once and it was because another person was loading metadata as I was consolidating.

  • Error on intercompany transaction process

    Hi, Folks.
    When represented the financial report after setting up the intercompany transaction, I met an error message as the similar meaning to " Detailed information for the transactions are not supported in the cell."
    This message is not original text 'cause I translated the message in Korean.
    Anybody knows how to solve this problem?

    Hi,
    If you are referring to that system doesnt allow you to enter intercompany trxns, then I would assume you need to set up support interco txns rountine as below example.
    '* INTERCOMPANY TRANSACTION ROUTINE *
    Sub Transactions()
    HS.SupportsTran "S#Actual.A#AR_ICP"
    HS.SupportsTran "S#Actual.A#AP_ICP"
    End Sub

  • Mapping of Intercompany transaction between SRM & SAP R/3

    Hi SRM gurus,
    We have a scenario where the client wants intercompany transactions to be mapped between SRM & R/3.
    i) they say according  to interco transactions, using SRM PO, the following journal entry will be posted upon GRN:
                        Dr           Expense
                             Cr          A/P to Co Code 1 for SRM Vendor code
    Question : if co code 1 recognizes A/R in Intercompany code, can we match the balance i.e : is it possible to recognize "A/P to Co Code 1 for SRM Vendor code" as Intercompany balance
    ii) When Co. 1 pays for pdts / services on behalf of Co. 2, an intercompany, the journal entry will be as follows :
    Co. 1 : Payment voucher (FB60)
    a) on GRN :
                        Dr   Prepaid promotion
                              Cr    GR/IR Clearing
    b) on IR :
                        Dr    GR/IR Clearing
                              Cr    A/P to Vendor
    Co. 1 : Journal Entry (FB70)
    Charge to Co. 2
                        Dr. A/R from Co. 2
                              Cr.  Prepaid Promotion
    Co. 2 : Journal Entry (MIRO)
    On Invoice Recipt to Co. 1
                        Dr. Expense
                              Cr. A/P to Co. 1
    Is it possible to make a set of journal entries as below by make config changes in SAP R/3 :
    Co.2 :
    Upon GRN : Dr Expense
                           Cr GR/IR Clearing
    Upon IR :   Dr GR/IR Clearing
                           Cr A/P to Co.1
    Co.1:
    Upon IR :   Dr. from Co. 2
                           Cr. A/P to Vendor
    The client wants to track the above postings scenario through old vendor code which is used as SRM vendor code and which is same as maintained in R/3 vendor master "Previous acct. no." field in Accounting view. To me the above entry on IR in R/3 is not at all feasible.
    Like to have your expert suggestions on the above scenario how to map b/w SRM & SAP R/3.
    Rgds,
    Samik

    Hi. What exactly are you looking for with the vendor material number? Note 444976 and 412817 are about it not transferring, butthey are very old, you have not said what version of SRM you are using.
    For the goods receipt, I doubt there will be a note to let you set the posting date or document date in the backend based on approval date, but you can easily use BBP_DOC_CHANGE_BADI method BBP_CONF_CHANGE to set this date to whetever you want.
    Regards,
    Dave.

  • Problem in loading transactional data from to 0MKT_DSO1(ods) to 0MKTG_C01

    Hi,
    I am trying to load lead transaction data to the standard Crm lead management cube from ODS.There is a problem while loading transaction data from 0MKT_DSO1(ods) to the infocube 0MKTG_C01 as the field 0STATECSYS2(CRM STATUS)  is set to 10 in ods -meaning incorrect transaction. This feild is not there in the infocube.
    There is a routine in the cube that deletes data records with (0statecsys2) set to 10.
    THIS field is not coming in the transaction.
    so, where can i see the master data in crm source system? and why is that feild getting set to 10 ?
    thanks in advance!

    Thanks for the reply..
    I have checked the Fact table which shows
    1. packet Dimension
    2. Time dimension
    3. Unit dimension.
    I have kept the 0CALDAY as the time characteristics.
    Sample data i have loaded from ODS to Cube.
    Sample data in ODS.
    Sales order No_____0CALDAY_____AMOUNT
    800001___________12/02/2009____15
    I have loaded this data in Cube with Full Upload.
    Data in Cube.
    Sales order No_____0CALDAY_____AMOUNT
    800001___________12/02/2009____15
    Again i am loading the same data to cube
    Data in cube after loading.
    Sales order No_____0CALDAY_____AMOUNT
    800001___________12/02/2009____15
    800001___________12/02/2009____15
    The data is duplicated and it is not cumulating.
    Am i missing anything on this.
    Pls help..
    Thanks,
    Siva.

  • Intercompany transaction does not exists

    Hi,
    I am have posted entry in F-02 and also i have asigned a new company code to the transaction and also document got created.
    now i need to reverse the document for the reversal reason 1 in T.Code FBU8.
    I am getting error message " Intercompany Transaction does not exists".
    Please help me with this issue.

    dear
    check settings in OBYA. is clearing account configured for intercompany postings
    and check that in OBA7 for the document type you using allow intercompany postings.
    regards
    rohit
    Edited by: ROHITBALI on Nov 19, 2011 7:28 AM

  • Intercompany Transaction Error

    Hi
    I'm currently having an issue doing intercompany transaction
    In FB50 the following transaction have been made
    8xxxxxx DR 10000 ( Cocode 1000) with tax type A0
    6xxxxxx CR 10000 ( Cocode 2000) with tax type V0
    When i try to simulate it gave me an error saying Trading partner in account xxxxxx cocode 1000 not valid.
    I have setup the vendor/customer master data and have input the trading partner field
    I used OBYA to setup the intercompany clearing account
    I have used OB28 to setup the proper validation
    Is there any steps i missed or have not done? or anything i should check?
    Thanks in advance

    Hi...
    As per your issue
    Trading partner must be the same in the both case (for both the company codes)..than only you can able to process.
    I think in your case the company (trading partner) may be different  for both the company codes
    Please check and confirm
    Regards
    vamsi

  • Intercompany Transactions Configuration

    I have a question about configuration for intercompany transactions.
    OBYA does not work in Europe because each company code in our case is separate legal entity and in Europe to be able to make intercompany entry you need to have billing document and there are VAT implications as well.
    SO OBYA is not an answer.
    Does somebody know what needs to be configured in SD (AR side ) and MM (AP side) and FI ( )so when intercompany transactions are created, they can be automatically billed and created automatically entries (with VAT) on both sides in bot involved company codes for AP and AR?
    To make my question more clear I give example of scenario:
    Selling organization one country (egz Spain) company code 0341, customer in Portugal (ship to  and Bill to Portugal) delivery from warehouse in Germany company code 0491
    So I have 2 documents created
    1. Sales invoice from selling organization in Spain to Customer  in PT.
    2. Intercompany billing from Germany to Spain
    What I found out so far is that AR is not complicated but AP side requires kind of EDI configuration.
    I would very much appreciate answer on my question.

    Hi Edyta,
    I came across such scenario in my last project.
    You can meet your requreiment via IDOC functionality. Being from FI, I just testing wrt tax codes. While testing, billing was done in Germany, later accounting entry is automatically posted in Spain.
    Please check on IDOCs functionality.
    I would try to share more information in m ynext reply.
    Kind regards,
    Dinesh Lakhotiya
    IGATE - FICO Consultant

  • OBYA - Intercompany transactions

    Hi,
    I would like to better understand the scenarios where the clearing accounts in transaction "BUV" (Tcode OBYA) should be set as GL postings and vendor postings.
    I am very familiar with settings in OBYA as Dr (40) & Cr (50) of GL accounts. When an intercompany transaction is posted, the system uses the clearing account specified here for the missing leg in each of the CoCodes.
    The above set up would also work if the paying company code is different in AP. I understand that trading partner fields can also be populated with the above setting.
    I am not clear on scenarios where the interco clearing accounts are specified as vendor accounts. Any information that would help me to better understand this would be great.
    Thanks,
    SD.

    Great question!  I think you define intercompany customers/vendors in OBYA, as opposed to clearing GL accounts, when several entities under one umbrella have contracts between them in such a way that they need to generate intercompany receivables/payables when they transact with each other.  Meaning, the need to generate sub-ledger entries.  If there is no such need, you just assign a clearing GL account in OBYA.  At a consolidated level (when you add up the numbers of all entities at the corporate level for external reporting purposes), the balance in clearing account should automatically net to zero.

  • Tax on intercompany transactions

    Hi gurus,
    when we do the intercompany transactions  for a free of charge invoices, SAP still incorporate Tax on the invoice. AP didn't want to see the tax on these free of charge invoices. we are using Taxware as our third party Tax software, any help to resolve this issue will be really appreciated. Points will be awarded.
    Thank you
    Priti

    To keep it simple, you should create a new Tax Code for  Tax Code for Intercompany Transactions (if you have anything already where the tax will be 0, you can use that also).
    The T Code to use it is FTXP.
    The Tax percentage rates for the 2 condition types XP1I and XP2I need to be Zero ( considering this tax code will be used by AP process) - If it's by AR process, the condition types that need to be zero are XR1I and XR2I.
    Hope that helps..
    Thanks,
    Nandita

  • Intercompany transactions between Multiple set of books

    Hi,
    We are trying to figure out a way to do Intercompany transactions across different set of books. How can we achieve this? Any pointers in this direction would be helpful
    Regards
    Bala

    Hi experts,
    I need your guidance/suggestion for the issue i have in Intercompany accounting.
    we have setup many-to-many intercompany in GL. Even for
    transactions involving two companies, we want the intercompany line created during posting ,to
    take a specific balancing segment. Posting job replaces only the due from/due to account but the company segment that we define.
    oracle std functionality has a default clearing company concept. In this all
    intercompany trasnactions tht we create for a specific source /category wud go to just 1 default clearing company. But our
    requirement is ..for companies x,y,z ,it shud go to company 100 and for others it should go to 200 ..
    But oracle doesnt support more than one clearing company. Has anybody faced same situation ?
    Any pointers to workarounds /customisations wud help.
    Thank u so much for ur time.

  • Looking for an Add-on for Intercompany Transactions between 2 databases.

    Does anybody know of an Add-on for B1 that would provide a solution for Intercompany Transactions between 2 legal entities (2 databases)?

    alain
    did you try out the intercompany addon by citisys?
    and if you are only looking at reporting...you can also explore crystal reports, given the fact that sap offers one user license free with every installation...

  • Intercompany Transactions in CO

    Dear Experts,
    i have one clarification for the intercompany transactions in the controlling module.
    Actually we have created one controlling area and many company codes for multiple countries which belongs to the controlling area.we have  taxation rule in some countries so we want to deactivate the intercompany transactions in the company codes which have a taxation rules.please be noted that the authorization object is the controlling area in our CO module.
    could you tell me what will be the best approach ?
    Thanks

    You can do that with a controlling validation (call up point = 2, Internal CO Posting: Send/Rec Val), checking COBL_RECEIVER-BUKRS and COBL_SENDER-BUKRS.
    Paolo

  • Problems with intercompany I_NONE in IC eliminations

    Hi, gurus,
    I have a problem with intercompany I_NONE in IC eliminations. Because of I_NONE I have double values for the intercompany reconciliations.
    Could anybody describe how business rules have to be set up in order to fix this error?
    Best regards,
    Gerd

    Hi Gerd,
    What is your problem; Intercompany Reconciliation Report showing double I_NONE figures? Or are because of the elimination the I_NONE doubled?
    What Rules are you using US Eliminations or the Legal Elimination? And are you using Force_Intco in the Rules?
    You case is giving to little info to help. Can you build your case with more info please?
    Kind regards,
    Johan

Maybe you are looking for

  • Is it possible to turn off a spot colour

    Hello Probably a dumb question but I will ask anyway. Is it possible to turn off a spot colour in CS4. I can effectively do it by creating a spot white and merging the spot colour I want to delete to the spot white using the ink aliasing. However, th

  • Can anyone find where the problem is.... in this small plsql code(apps)

    hi... plz try to execute the following code... i'm getting 'no data found' error where infact there are thousands of rows DECLARE CURSOR C1 IS SELECT REPORT_HEADER_ID FROM AP_EXPENSE_REPORT_LINES_ALL; INV_NUM VARCHAR2(50); BEGIN FOR I IN C1 LOOP SELE

  • The Iphone could not be restored. An unknown error occurred (26)

    Hello There, My iPhone 4s as of Saturday as been giving me this error. I attempted to re-charge it in the USB Port on my XBox 360, as I always do, and then this is what has been showing on my screen for several days now. I have attempted to charge it

  • How to link iMac to MacBook Air?

    I have a mid 2011 iMac and a MacBook Air. How can I link the computers so that everything I do on one automatically shows up on the other?  I do a lot with Word  and PowerPoint especially and am currently having to transfer files with a flash drive o

  • Xcode issue after upgrade

    I had Xcode 4.0 installed on SL, then I updated to Lion and got Xcode 4.1. But now when I try to start it I get that Xcode 4.0 requires SL. According to App Store I have both installed. But I should probably have uninstalled 4.0 before going to Lion.