Problem in MTO returns scenario

Hi All!
I am working in ECC 6.0 environment.
We have a MTO scenario. During the Returns delivery I am getting the following error during doing PGR.
Error: Special stock E not supported (check your entry) Material XXXX Dely Qty XXX KG
MT: E
Area: M7
MSG: 146
Item : 10
Diagnosis:
The specified objeckt (spl Stock E) is not supported.
Procedure:
Make sure your entries are correct.
I have even checked the movement type assignment in T.code OMJJ.
The movement type 651 and 651 E is allowed for Tcode VL01N.
Do I have to do any other setting or check for any customisation?
Thanks in advance,
Karthik

Hi Atul,
Since ours is a MTO scenario the 'E' indicator is activated even for normal sales as it is sales order specific.
Secondly the returns sales document is RE, and the Delivery document is LR.
The problem is the document type is not accepting the movement type 651 E. And since I am creating the returns with respect to the order created, I am unable to change the movement type or the indicator in the documents.
Hope you understand the problem better now.
Thanks & Regards
Karthik

Similar Messages

MTO returns

Dear All,
When I was creating reutrn delivery for MTO with reference to sales order delivery is not happening, and the following error I am getting. could u plz suggest me how to comeout of this?
I have posted the stock by using mov type 501 special stock indicator E.
Error:
Special Stock E not supported (check your entry)
Message no. M7146
Diagnosis
The specified objekt (Special Stock E) is not supported.
Procedure
Make sure your entries are correct.
Thanx&Regards,
Ramu

Hi Atul,
Please go through the following link, I was also facing the same problem. I changed the movement type to 653 to solve the problem.
[problem in MTO returns scenario;
Regards,
Karthik

Credit Note in case of return scenario

Hi,
In case of return scenario, credit note is issued with reference to return order or return delivery?
I am unable to see the copy control setting in IDES for RE(Return Order) to G2(Credit Memo).
Could any one please let me know the setting for the same (Header and item).
Regards
Suman

Hi Suman,
As for the standard in the IDES,the Credit memo will be created with reference to the Creditmemeo request because of that RE to G2 copy control setting may not avail.
You copy the settings same as Creditmemo request(CR) to Credit memo (G2), You just change the name CR in to RE it will work.
-->Other wise you can use Credit for returns RE document type to create credit memo for return order RE for this copy control avail in the IDES t.code VTFA.
I hope it will help you
Regards,
Murali.
Edited by: Murali Mohan.T on Feb 27, 2008 11:07 AM

Delivery gets created in VL01N - Return scenario even after error message

Hi,
I am having following issue explained in details in steps -
We have a service return scenario and following steps have been followed in ECC.
Material code used in this case is batch managed material.
Step 1 u2013
We have created a sales order(VA01) with document type ZRE(Itu2019s a kind of return order). This return order actually coming from CRM.
Step 2 u2013
We are creating delivery using VL01N transaction for return order.
Step 3 u2013
We avoid giving batch number in VL01N and try to save the delivery document. System prompt error saying u201CEnter batchu201D. Subsequently we press return keys to cancel the error message and try to come out of the transaction.
Step 4 u2013
Instead inputting batch number, we try come out of the document creation step.
Step 5 u2013
We go to document flow button of sales order and we could see the delivery created although we came out of the delivery creation process after the error message, without saving the document.
Also note instead of coming out of the document creation, if we again try to save the document, system throws update termination with a reason saying u201CError info... ABAP/4 processor: SAPSQL_ARRAY_INSERT_DUPRECu201D, which is quite obvious as system has already created the delivery and we are trying to create / save the document once again in VL01N
We are in dilemma now.
What is the cause of this abnormal behaviour? I don't know.
Any one experienced this, feedback is appreciated,
Regards,
Dipak

Hi,
The SAPSQL_ARRAY_INSERT_DUPREC error is not bothering me much.
My worry is once "Enter batch" error message comes, I am not interested to create the delivery any more.
So I come out of the transaction by pressing return key.
Now when I press return key, system gives me the delivery number, this should not be the case as message given was an error message.
If I go to the SE16N, I could see the delivery number in database.
Also system prompts me to save the delivery which I am not interested to do, just I want to come out after error message.
What could be the reason, I don't know. Ever after error message system gives you the delivery.
Which is very strange.
Any input is apprecited,
Regards,
Dipak

Sales Return Scenario

Hi,
I have a query on the follwoing sales return scenario.
A manufacturer has two plants viz: a manufacturing plant and a sales depot which are located in two different states which will typically relate to two sales organisations . A sale has been done to a customer from the manufacturing plant. The customer wants to return some material due to damages/defect but can only send the material to the depot location since it is nearer to him. since the sale is from manufacturing plant how do we execute the returns process. Please note there are Excise and tax implications.
Appreciate some suggestion on this

Hi sir,
In this scenario I understand that under the same company with different Exicise and tax camponents, you have a plant and a depot in different states fine.
You can take returns at depot as required by the customer, maintain proper pricing for stock trancefer from depot to plant taking Excise and tax part in to account., and try it out.
Regards
DSR

FOR MTO & MTS scenario when the Production order shows the Sysy status DLV?

Hi ALL,
In the MTO & MTS scenario when the Production order system status become DLV ?
Regards
Satish

Hi Satish,
For both the planning strategies (MTO/MTS)..
The status of the production order becomes DLV ,
when you do GR for the order with 101 movement type.
(OR)
At the time of final confirmation if automatic goods receipt is activated.
Regards,
Anil

Problem with MTO scenario-urgent

hi everyone,
our client is using MTO process, where they will exchange halb materials for the fert level production order. i.e according to MTO sales order will trigger procurement seperately at all levels of bom( as sales order stock). what is happening at the client side is they are converting plnd orders to production orders generated in the stock requirement list for HALBS, as thier wish they want to use these randomly for fert production,
costs differences are arising.....
so kindly suggest a solution
thanks
madhu

Hi Madhu,
Your requirement is simple. If my understanding is right in your scenario you have a FERT (A) which is MTO and the assemblies/components (B) used for manufacturing it is a stock item or MTS.
For component A you have to define in material master MRP view 3 with planning strategy - 20 and in MRP4 maintain "1" for Individual and Collective requirement indicator.
For component B you have to define in material master MRP view 3 with a suitable planning strategy -(Not= 20) and in MRP4 maintain "2" for Individual and Collective requirement indicator.
This would resolve the problem. Reward your points,
thank you,
Regards,
Prasobh

Problem IDOC to File scenario: No service for system SAPIDC, clnt in ID

in IDOC to File scenario, when IDOCis triggered from R/3 to XI, it gives error in SM58 transaction
"No service for system SAPIDC, client 800 in Integration Directory"

In a scenario, i have a BPM which has a transformation step which contains a mutimapping ...means 2 messages mapped to 1 messgaes, here in the mapping i m using an UDF and written code to extract the file name from dynamic configuration.....
the problem is ...the same BPM contains another transformation step which contains a message mapping (which is not multi mapping), and here the code (UDF) works to fetch the file name...
the code is all correct....and it looks like
DynamicConfiguration conf = (DynamicConfiguration)
container.getTransformationParameters().get(StreamTransformationConstants.DYNAMIC_CONFIGURATION);
DynamicConfigurationKey key = DynamicConfigurationKey.create("http://sap.com/xi/XI/System/File","FileName");
String sourceFileName = conf.get(key);
if (sourceFileName == null ){
sourceFileName = "ErrorFile.xml";}
return sourceFileName;

Problem in simple filetofile scenario with BPM

Hi
I am a starter to XI. I am implementing simple file2file scenario with BPMs.
But I am getting error while looking into SXMB_MONI.
Under "Monitor for Processed XML messages"
Number of XML message Found 3 (which is my input 3 xmls which is fine) but
"Status is RED Flag".
"Error Category: BPE_ADAPTER"
"Error ID: UNKNOWN_MESSAGE".
Please help me out with this problem.
Regards
Sam

Hi Raj,
When i click PE getting following error:
"Unable to perform action for selected message".
When i double click the row, it takes me to xml message versions where i can RED FLAG for "Call Adapter". In the trace i foudn the below at the end:
<trace level =1 type=system error> error exception return from pipeline processing"</trace>
Hope this helps to guide me mroe
sam

Problems with my new scenario.

Hi everyone.
I've got an adapter installed on a PC. this adapter send files of an interface to XI.
The problem is that i don´t know how to configure the Integration directory in order to get this file, call a SAP r3 to check the existence of a person and return the answer in XML format to another PC with an ftp shared folder.
The problem is that i don't understando how can i say that there is an external adapter sending files.
Thanks

Hi Inigo,
You don't need to configure it. A sender file adapter will automatically send the files to the entry pipeline of the Integration server. You need to just configure the Integration scenario (in the Int Directory) from the receiver determination onwards.
Steps:
1. In the sender file adapter (on your PC) configure the sender system, interface name & namespace.
2. In the Integration scenario, set up a receiver determination using the details used in the file adapter.
Since this is a async - sync scenario, you can use a BPM in the middle which will receive the file from the adapter, make a synch call to R/3 for the person check and then make another asynch call to the FTP folder of the other PC.
Hope this helps you.
Cheers
Manish

Problem with Http RFC Scenario

hi all.........
Am doing an HTTP RFC scenario. The scenario is working fine with all messages in IS, IE and AE being successful. But the problem is the RFC response am getting is not what is expected. When i run the RFC directly with the same input value I get the correct response. Can anybody figure out what is the problem. In the channel (adapter monitoring) what comes is :
"RFC_HISTORY
- Error: 2007-01-16 09:47:52 IST: Message processed for interface ZBAPI_NETWORK_CONF_ADD: com.sap.aii.af.rfc.afcommunication.RfcAFWException: error while processing message to remote system:com.sap.aii.af.rfc.core.client.RfcClientException: failed to parse BAPI response due to: com.sap.aii.af.rfc.util.bapi.BapiException: Parameter with name RETURN not found.
- Error: 2007-01-15 19:57:21 IST: Message processed for interface ZBAPI_NETWORK_CONF_ADD: com.sap.aii.af.rfc.afcommunication.RfcAFWException: error while processing message to remote system:com.sap.aii.af.rfc.core.client.RfcClientException: failed to parse BAPI response due to: com.sap.aii.af.rfc.util.bapi.BapiException: Parameter with name RETURN not found.
- OK: 2007-01-15 19:28:31 IST: Message processed for interface ZBAPI_NETWORK_CONF_ADD "
thanks in advannce

Hi,
><i>I ve used RFC itself as message type for http by importing it into external definition. So since both structures are same i omitted both MM and IM</i>
Should work fine. Can you look into SXMB_MONI and check what the response is? Make sure that the request message is also as expected.
Regards
Bhavesh

Problem with RFC-XI_SOAP Scenario

Hello Guru's,
I am stuck with a scenario in RFC-XI-SOAP. Its a simple scenario where in I am trying to pass in two numbers to a web service and the web service will return the addition of two numbers back to the RFC.
The scenario configuration looks perfect. I have referred all the related blogs (blogs related to RFC-XI-SOAP scenarios) after I configured the scenario. The RFC destination which I created was tested successful.
When I executed the RFC at the destination, it threw a dump saying "call to messaging system failed: com.sap.aii.af.ra.ms.api.DeliveryException:". When I checked the sender RFC adapter in RWB, this is the message what I got
- Error: 2008-01-09 12:04:29 GMT+05:30: Message processed for interface ZRFC_SAMPLE_ADD: com.sap.aii.af.mp.module.ModuleException: call to messaging system failed: com.sap.aii.af.ra.ms.api.DeliveryException: XIAdapter:ADAPTER.SOAP_EXCEPTION:soap fault: Server was unable to read request. ---> There is an error in XML document (1, 166). ---> Input string was not in a correct format. caused by: com.sap.aii.af.ra.ms.api.DeliveryException: XIAdapter:ADAPTER.SOAP_EXCEPTION:soap fault: Server was unable to read request. ---> There is an error in XML document (1, 166). ---> Input string was not in a correct format.
For the message it quite clear that there is something wrong with the format. But when I tested WSDL in XML spy, it ran fine.
Could anybody help me with the cause of this problem?
Thanking you in advance,
Vijay

Hi Biplab,
Thanks for getting back !!!
The structure of the RFC is quite simple. It just has two import parameters and one export parameters.
Fyi.... I am pasting down the structure of the RFC and WSDL below.
Structure of RFC----
""Local interface:
*" IMPORTING
*"     VALUE(INPUT1) TYPE I
*"     VALUE(INPUT2) TYPE I
*" EXPORTING
*"     VALUE(OUTPUT) TYPE STRING
Structure of WSDL----
<xsd:element name="Addition">
                    <xsd:complexType>
                         <xsd:sequence>
                              <xsd:element name="a" type="xsd:int" />
                              <xsd:element name="b" type="xsd:int" />
                         </xsd:sequence>
                    </xsd:complexType>
               </xsd:element>
               <xsd:element name="AdditionResponse">
                    <xsd:complexType>
                         <xsd:sequence>
                              <xsd:element name="AdditionResult" type="ResultClass" minOccurs="0" />
                         </xsd:sequence>
                    </xsd:complexType>
               </xsd:element>
               <xsd:complexType name="ResultClass">
                    <xsd:sequence>
                         <xsd:element name="c" type="xsd:string" minOccurs="0" />
                    </xsd:sequence>
               </xsd:complexType>
Any suggestions plz !!!!
Thanks,
Vijay

A problem about incorrect return value

Hi,expert:
   we have a scenario ECC(Proxy)->PI->P6(soap), request and response message use the xslt mapping.
   The response message contains chinese characters,but when the message come to PI,the chinese charater is garble.
   The xml encoding is UTF-8.
   I have tested this interface by soapui,and it can return the correct character.
   How can i solve this problem?

Try to change the XML encoding by using XMLAnonymizerBean adapter module.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/45/d169186a29570ae10000000a114a6b/content.htm
Chinese Simplified (GB18030) GB18030
Chinese Simplified (GB2312) GB2312
Chinese Simplified (HZ) HZ
Chinese Traditional (Big5) Big5
Japanese (Shift-JIS) Shift_JIS
Japanese (EUC) EUC-JP
Korean EUC-KR
Unicode (UTF-8) UTF-8
refer this
http://htmlpurifier.org/docs/enduser-utf8.html

GATP in MTO/MTS scenario

We have an ongoing implementation for a paper industry using GATP. Ours is basically a make-to-order(MTO) scenario. But we have some stocks (from order cancellation, rejects, etc) which we move to unrestricted stock category (that is without account assignment). So our planning strategy group contains MTO(primary) and MTS (secondary) strategy. We use reqmnt classes 046 and 049 respectively.
Reqmnt types are KEK and KSVS respectively. When we create a sales order we default the reqmnt type to KSVS so we can do a GATP check for unrestricted stock. We use basic availability check, rules-based check, and CTP.
We need solutions for the following:
1. When we do the GATP check it always reduces the required quantity from the available unrestricted stock quantity. In some situations, we don't want to consider the stock even if it matches most of customer requirements (for plethora of reasons). Is there a way to do confirmation bypassing the stock and trigger CTP for the entire required quantity.
Example: Unrestricted stock qty available=100, required qty=200. Instead of producing 100, is there a way to tell the system to produce 200(since we don't want to take the available stock).
2. When we do only the basic availability check (without activating RBA), in the GATP screen when we click on the delivery proposal button, it takes us to the sales order screen and we are able to see the confirmed quantity in the schedule line. In this case when we click the check instruction button in the GATP overview screen, it shows check mode 049 and business event A as expected. But when we also activate RBA and do a GATP check from the sales order it shows the substitution list with buttons for delivery proposal. If we click on a button for delivery proposal where it shows a confirmed quantity, it doesn't show any confirmed quantity in the delivery proposal screen. Also, when we click on the check instructions for one of the substituted rows, it shows check mode 046 and business event A.
Why we are not able to do a confirmation in this case? Are we missing any setting in R/3.
We are using ECC 6.0 and SCM 5.0
Thanks,
Ramesh

Tilman,
Well, it can be executed...but the results are inconsistent. RBA GATP will in some limited circumstances give deceptively reasonable results for MTO, especially with CTP. However, it is not a comprehensive solution as pointed out by Sanjeev. The problem lies in the subitems created in ECC. Each subitem is account assigned to the sales order item or subitem in MTO (although it is not yet clear to me that YOUR 'MTO' orders are so configured). When performing an atp, and during Backorder Processing, when you perform the product check, the first thing the check does is to delete any subitem and all unfirmed supply elements in APO and then run RBA GATP. Now, the account assignment is no longer relevant for the subitem, but is changed to being relevant to the ITEM. Product check can no longer find any firmed supply elements (such as stock, or production orders, or Purchase orders), and will either deconfirm, go to lead time, or create another planned order, depending on your settings. This is unsatisfactory.
You also mention seeing Business Event 'A' in your scope of check. This is typically 'not-account-assigned'. AE is usually used for Sales order account assigned checking. This is hard coded in SD and sent to APO during the ATP check (well, it was before ECC6, I haven't worked much on this rev yet). If you are not getting Business Event 'AE' or 'A-something' when you do a 'scope of check', then you are only checking generic stock.
You didn't mention the strategies you are using, but KEK/046 sounds quite a bit like strat 25. Anyhow, whichever it is, the strategy configuration in ECC should have 'Acct assign cat' set to 'E", if you want MTO. If you are actually creating MTO requirements, I would be surprised that you didn't receive an error during your ATP check, without also having 'AE' configured in SCM under "maintain check control" and also under 'Maintain Check instructions".
Rgds,
DB49

Problem with "carriage Return" or "Line Feed" in a table

Hello,
I need help with the function Zeichen(), so called it in german, I'm not sure if it is char() in english.
In Pages Version 4.0.1 (746) I've created a table in Pages with this function to make an "carriage Return" in a cell.
Here an example: { ="Hello" & Zeichen(10) & "World" }, in the cell is now:
| Hello |
| World |
But in Pages Version 4.0.3 (766) this function ZEICHEN() not allow the number 10 and other till 32 (I allready read the manual and understand this problem).
Anybody an idea to make a "Carriage Return" or "Line feed" in a formular, in a cell, in a table, in Pages?
Thanks
Detlev Kormann

kdetlev wrote:
Your workaround will not be possible in my table, because there is no empty cell in the table, but I think it is also a good help too.
*In fact I forgot that you are using a table in Pages.*
Remaining on my first idea, In Numbers we may achieve the same goal using an auxiliary table with a single cell containing the needed line break.
If this table is named "LineBreak",
the formula will be:
="Hello"&LineBreak :: $A$1&"World"
*In Pages, here is my workaround:*
Enter the cell
type a§b
don't type the character § but ctrl + return.
The cell will contain
a
b
with the arrow, move before the a
type =B2&"
delete the original a
move to the right
delete the original b
type "&C7
Yvan KOENIG (VALLAURIS, France) mercredi 7 octobre 2009 17:20:04

Problem in MTO returns scenario

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for