Problem in PIR-MD62
Hi,
In MD63,The DV(Version number for Independent requirements) is GP(Production plan).I have enter it mistakenly.Now i need to change it to 00(Requirements plan).
Can i directly change it to 00?
Whether it will have any impact on others?
or Can i delete the line and create a new one with 00 version?
Please help me.
Thanks
Srini
Dear Srinivasan,
Goto MD62-->enter the material,plant,date range and select the radio button for all active and inactive
version.
check for the version which has a tick mark under the check box for active.
If tick mark is there under active check box for the versions,then it means they will be relevant to MRP
since they have the tick makr under active.
Regards
Mangalraj.S
Similar Messages
-
Problems with PIR reserving stock
Hi
We are having a problem with planned indpendent requirements reserving stock. When we place a sales order, we get no availability even though we have stock in the plant. But when we remove the planned independent requirements (VSF) for that particular combination of material and plant, we get availability for the sales order. We are using standard planning strategy 40 for the material.
Does anyone know what is causing the planned indpendent requirements reserving stock? What settings affects this scenario? Is there any way to not make the PIRs reserving stock?
thanks in advanceHi
========================================================================================
But how can this be the logic? Let us say I have 500 in stock and PIR of 200...then sales order is 300, overconsuming the forecast. Even next montht the PIR is 500 so the consumption period settings should not be a problem...
Why does it alter an error message if the sales orders are greater than PIR? I mean, after all we have the materials in stock as unrestricted?
==========================================================================================
Bit more explanation on the above :
let us take the below figures as example
stock : 500
PIRs : 200 ( Say In Nov/2010)
PIRs : 200 ( Say In Dec/2010)
PIRs : 100 ( say In Jan/2011)
If you receive a sales Order 300 ( Say in NOV/2010),
then this sales Order will consume PIRs present in NOV/2010, But still it needs 100 more PIRs)
But you have PIRs in Dec/2010,
in Order to consume those PIRs, which are in Dec/2010, your Forward consumption period should be sufficient.
Otherwise, you will face the same issue as you are facing as of now.
Let us ge,t some more experts comments on this.
Regards
BRSR -
PIR reduction for PGI of STO's using delivery note.
Hi all,
Thanks in advance for the solution of this problem.
We have problem for PIR reduction against STO's. Planned qty gets reduces against PGI of STO's and withdrawal qty increases. This causes problem in actual demand qty.
Steps we do for STO posting.
1. STO's creation using transaction ME21n
2. Delivery note creation using transaction VL10b
3. PGI using transaction Vl02n
Startegy group : 10
Requirement Type: LSF
Requirement Class: 100
Cosumption Mode: 2
Movement type for PGI: 641 - Sytem picks up automatically.
Thanks and Best Regards
Prakash ShettyHi,
Not sure I completely understand the problem. This strategy is supposed to reduce the PIR upon Goods Issue. It only takes into account the PIR and not the Actual demand. If you want the demand to reduce based on the actual demand, then use strategy 40 which will take into account the greater of forecast or actual demand. Is that what you're trying to do? Also, pay attention to the backward and forward consumption period as well as how you have your MD74 running to re-organize independent demand. -
DP forecast does not transfer to R/3
Hi, Guys
I am looking for the reason why DP forecast does not tranfer to R/3 PIR.
Recently I added on more DC plant on 6 DC plants, then I created the charateristics combination of material for new DC plant and included CIF model too.
All looked fine in APO but I got a problem for PIR in R/3, existing plant had new forecast from the batch job, but the material of new plant didn't any forecast. even MD62 and MD63 do not have any version
So, I had confirmed MRP3 view of material for new plant, it was same with other plant setting.
Could you help what I had missed in config or master setting?
Thanks for your help!Hi ,
you have to include the new plant in the distribution defenition. (/n/sapapo/cp1) . the publication type will be "planned independent requirement" and location will be the new plant. Iam not sure if you have done this. Please check.
Thanks
Saradha -
Mass strategy group change - 40 to 52
Hi experts,
I want to change strategy group from 40 to 52 for about 2000 materials.
It implies that PIR type and customer reqmt type change from VSF/KSV to VSE/KSVS.
Mass PIR change is not a problem because PIR are transfered from an APO system.
But then there is an issue with existing schedule lines with customer reqmt type KSV which don't
consume anymore the PIR.
Is there a standard tcode or program to mass update the schedule lines rqmt type ?
What is the good practice to perform this change ?
Thanks in advance,
RaphaelDear
If u Have the Idea of LSMW then try to do the changes wht ever u want by LSMW ...
It will be much easy for mass Changes .Otherwise , you need to first delete all the the PIR's of VSF requirement type using transaction MD62 , once PIR is delete you need to run MRP in "Delete Recreate Mode". Planned orders which are firmed will not be automatically deleted in MRP run , you cal delete these orders in MASS using transaction MD16.
Next would be to check all the sales order which derived VSF/KSV procurement requirement type, you need to delete this line item and need to create new ones with VSE/KSVS. requirement type.
To carry on material level changes for planning startegy , either u should goto MASS/MM17 but it will not affect the exixting deamand or Customer Requireimenet .You need to changes the Requirement Type at PIR-SChedule line as well as Customer requirement Type .
Regards
JH
Edited by: Jiaul Haque on Feb 21, 2011 9:21 AM
Edited by: Jiaul Haque on Feb 21, 2011 9:22 AM -
Purchasing Info Record- Different Regular Vendor for different Plant
Dear Guru,
I'm encounter a problem with PIR.
I have this PIR 9001 (Vendor A) and 9002 (Vendor B) for material A, which i have extended to 2 different Pur.Org 0001 under company code 0001 and Pur.Org 0002 uner Company code 0002.
For Pur.Org 0001, i set the Regular Vendor as Vendor A, but when i trying to set the regular vendor for Pur.Org 0002 to be as Vendor B, i receved the message as "Up to now, vendor A has been regular vendor for this material".
And After i changed this Regular vendor to vendor B, this changed have also affected the PIR for Pur. Org 0001.
Can i know if there is a way to change the PIR Regular vendor at Pur.Org or Plant level?
Thank you very much,
Regards,
Chee WeeHi,
Regular vendor is at client level.
That's why, you cann't maintain more then one vendor (Source of supply) for the same material.
If you want to maintin separate vendor for the each plant and same material combination, then don't activate / select regular vendor option in the info record. You have to maintain source list.
Sour list is nothing but a list of source of supplies for the specific plant and material combination with in the validity period of time. If there are more then one vendor for the specific plant and material combination for the same validity period of time, then you can activate fixed vendor option in the source list. Then at the time of creating PO, SAP will pick fixed vendor for the Plant and Material combination.
So first, system will check whether regular vendor is there for this material in the info record. If is there,system will pick regular vendor in the PO. If not, then system will check fixed vendor in the source list for the material and plant combination. If yes, then system will pick fixed vendor from the source list. If not system will propose all the vendors in the source list. If the source list it self not created, then user has to give vendor number manually.
Regards
KRK -
Hi,
We have a scenario where the finished material (GA_FINISH) is assembled as per the customer requirement
A level below that we can produce & maintain in stock (GA_ASSLY)
Process planned as follows
GA_FINISH (use strategy 51)
Create PIR for GA_FINISH
Execute MRP
Planned order created for GA_FINISH (non-convertible) & GA_ASSLY (convertible)
Converion of Planned order of GA_ASSLY to Production order and process the order to generate the inventory
Create a sales order for GA_FINISH
- Requirement is not transfered to Production (by setting sch line category as 'NO MRP')
Create a project for GA_FINISH & generate the reservation
Execute MRP for the WBS where the material is assigned GA_FINISH
Against the WBS MRP generates a account assigned planned order
Problem: the PIR created for GA_FINISH is not consumed & the WBS MRP has created an additional planned order
Requirement: the PIR should be reduced as is the case using strategy 50 MTO using Sales order
Has anyone worked in this kind of a scenario? The strategy & the process step that we have adopted is it correct?
Thanks,
Warm regards,
UmeshDear Umesh,
If you want to make and stock GA_ assembly, why dont you create requirements for GA_Assy instead of creating requirements for GA_Finish. You have also mentioned that GA_Finish is as per customer requirements so i would not prefer to create requirements for GA_Finish.
Try moving the Stock of GA_Assy to the required WBS before running MRP for the WBS.
Regards,
S.Satish Kumar -
Hi experts,
Run MRP (online) for the plant what is the t-code
ThanksHy Kumar,
MD40 Online MPS Run
MD01 Online MRP Run
MDBT As Background Job
Other Help ful T.code for MRP
MD61 Create PIR
MD62 Change PIR
MD63 Display PIR
MD67 Staggered Split (PIR)
MD73 Display Total Requirements
MS64 Copy Version
MD41 Single-Item, Multi-Level
MD42 Single-Item, Single-Level
MD43 Single-Item, Inteactive
MD50 Single-Item, Sales Order
MD02 Single-Item, Multi-Level
MD03 Single-Item, Single-Level
Regards,
Dhaval
Regards -
Problem with configuration supporting point in MD62
Hi,
well I have detected a problem with my planned independent requirements for some materials.
The materials that are concerned are semifinished product which have an active BOM.
Example :
material A composed with material B and C.
On the material A I have the strategy group 54. For these materials I have "VSE" PIR.
The problem is that for many materials, the VSE needs can not be seen by components.
Example, on material A, I have a VSE need on 15.02.2010, MRP generates a planned order on 15.02.2010 on material A. No problem but I have in MD04 an alert 52 for these PO.
I go to material B or C in MD04 and I don't see any needs ! The planned order needs have not been splitted to the components.
I have seen that if I go to MD62 for material A and if I click on "Configuration supporting point", everything is OK after next MRP Run but the problem seems to go back after few days.
The strange thing is that it works perfectly for some materials and it doesn't work for others materials although there is no differences between data of these materials !
Finally, I have to say that program RM60RR20 is turning every night and I have seen that there are some calls to function DELETE_SUPPOINT. Maybe this program is deleting the supporting point but it should recreate the supporting point after...
Is there anybody which know how this program is working or why sometimes my supporting point is deleted without being recreate ?
Thanks.Hi Frederico,
Have you tried typing the query in query manager and are you sure you've selected the correct column? You can check the column name if you switch system information on and verifying the values in the database for that column.
Hope it helps,
Adele -
Hi PP Gurus,
I have a problem related with PIRs.
PIRs can be created and change in MD61/MD62. What are the possible cause when your PIRs are disappear after 2-3 days?
I checked the PIRs history.
The material has a value of 250 for 11/07/08, after 2 days i noticed that the value was changed to zero (0 for 11/09/08) and the person responsible is DAYBAT. Is it possible that when a job runs it overwrites the value of this PIRs back to zero?
I checked the spool using SM37 (date of change: 11/09/08 08:38:33AM, DAYBAT) but there were no job/spool created for that date and time.
What are the possible cause of this problem?
I hope you can help me.
Thanks
Edited by: russell crystal on Nov 28, 2008 6:15 PMRussel,
It's not clear to me what you want to know.
1. You already know that the PIRs were deleted by a job run.
2. You know from the PIR history under which user name the job ran.
2,5. It would have been good to know which strategy group you are using - no information has been revealed to us..
3. You know that using trx STAD you can check by which trx the job deleted the PIRs - you didn't tell us about the result of this investigation anything.
4. I assume SAP didn't make the decision on its own to create a job, make it run and after delete it. I mean a real flesh&bone user should be behind the batch job. You can also ask her/him/them.
What can we help you?
Regards,
Csaba
Edited by: Csaba Szommer on Nov 30, 2008 3:44 PM
Edited by: Csaba Szommer on Nov 30, 2008 3:45 PM
Edited by: Csaba Szommer on Nov 30, 2008 3:50 PM
Edited by: Csaba Szommer on Nov 30, 2008 3:57 PM -
Need F.M for MD61/MD62 for deleting existing all materials of PIR
Hi ALL,
i am using Function module REQUIREMENTS_MAINTAIN
for adding component(materials) to PIR,
But my problem is i have to delete all existing old componets(materials). transaction is MD61.MD62
Pls mail me if there is any deletion flag set and also function module.
it's very urgent basis please.
pls reply to thisUse function module K_WERKS_OF_BUKRS_FIND to get list of plants for company code
or
get the list of plants from table t001w
and
write a select query in MARC table where werks = list of plants obtained. -
i have ipad4 but i have a big problem in blutooth so ican not pir this with other devices . please help me
Which other devices? Please note the list of supported Bluetooth protocols below.
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT3647 -
Hi All
I have created a requirement plan for PIR in md61.Now, the requirement is visible in md04.But then when i wanted to delete the requirement against one day of the plan,i am unable to do this.When i delete in md62,the requirement against the specific date disappears in md04.But after MRP run(in my site MRP runs as a background job daily) the requirement in md04 again reappears .Can anyone help me in understanding the issue.
thanks in advance.Hi Laxmana,
Change the Planning Mode to 3 - Delete and Recreate and try
thanks and regards
Murugesan -
Strategy 70 PIRs Consumption problem
Dear All
I am using strategy 70 at my HALB, the problem is system is not reducing its PIRs when i make GI against its FERT Order reservation.
Please advice..
regards
NavaidDear Navaid,
Thanks for feed back and nice to hear that your issue is resolved
I guess based on your below thread you have tried option 40 and 70 stratagies and it worked
[Planning Strategy;
Since issue is resolved close the threads
Good Luck !
Regards
Madhu -
Problem with gross requirement planning pir is not getting reduced
Dear Gurus
I am trying to use strategy 11 for a particular finished product.(having bom and routing)
In the material master I have set mrp type pd lot size ex .strategy group 11, mixed mrp 2,item category group norm, availabilty checking group 02 .
Then I made manually pir for that material in md61 with BSF requirement type .
Then ran the mrp for that material in md02.
Planned orders came .(In md04 screen that gross requirement line text also came as usual )Converted them to prodn order and then did the gr in mb31 with 101 mvt type. After doing the gr the pir should get reduced in md04 screen which is not happening . Where I am going wrong
Regards
Sandip SarkarDear Sandip Sarkar,
It usually happens run MRP and ckeck.
Strategy 11 in summary :-
1. Sales Order creation - no impact.
2. Goods Receipt - minus the quantity for the oldest planned independent in demand management.
For e.g. if PIR is 100 and delivery 90, PIR becomes 10 (withdrawal 90).
3. Delivery - no impact as delivery is issue from sales order.
This strategy is particularly useful if you need to produce, regardless of whether you have stock or not. For instance, steel or cement producers might want to use this strategy because they cannot shut down production; a blast furnace or a cement factory must continue to produce, even if this means having to produce to stock.
You need to maintain the following master data for the finished product:
Maintain strategy group 11 on the MRP screen.
Set the Mixed MRP indicator to 2 on the MRP screen.
Maintain the item category group (for example, NORM) on the Sales Organization screen.
Maintain the Availability check field so that you perform an availability check without the replenishment lead time (checking group 02 in the standard system).
Strategy 10
Stock is taken into account Yes
reduction of planned independent
requirements takes place during u2026 u2026 goods issue for delivery order (discrete production),
11
Stock is taken into account No
Reduction of planned independent
requirements takes place during u2026 ... goods receipt for a production
order (discrete production),
for a planned order (repetitive
manufacturing), or for a purchase
order (trading goods).
Edited by: Vachanala Rajasekhar on May 7, 2010 11:55 AM
Maybe you are looking for
-
Dynamic file name in receive FTP file adapter
Hi, All, I have a ABAP proxy -> FTP scenorio. The sender side MT is like this: <Sender_MT> <FileName>abc.txt</FileName> <Record> <TEXT>.......</TEXT> <TEXT>.......</TEXT> <TEXT> ......</TEXT> </Record> </Sender_MT> I would like
-
Rename function stopped working on batch actions
I seem to be having the same problem as this unanswered quesion:http://forums.adobe.com/message/1644053#1644053 I have a series of actions preparing files for the web. The ones that create jpeg's using the conventional "save as.." dialogue work fin
-
Can't install KB2553549 on Windows Server 2008 SP1
Hi all, Firsth, sorry for my english. It may be weak :P I have a problem when try to install update KB2553549: (All the TCP/IP ports that are in a TIME_WAIT status are not closed after 497 days from system startup in Windows Vista, in Windows 7, in W
-
In OO Alv toolbar, sum and subsum buttons are disable as default, WHY ?
i want to enable sum and subsum buttons in alv toolbar. However, as default those buttons are disable. How can i solve ?
-
Input dialog question OK/Cancel Button
Hi there, I�m busy with an application that displays an input dialog box on start up. It prompts the user for their name. This imput will then be used for a JLabel welcoming the user with their name. If no name is entered. The Jlabel will display �We