Problem in Regular vendor

i got the chk box of regular vendor in info records. bt when i create info record i need plant and pur. org so how a regular vendor becomes client level.

Hi,
In t-code OMKH transaction you have the regular vendor indicator checkbox is flagged for your plant.
create info record atplant level
and check following link also
[http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/EN/12/4eeb9f959c11d28a470000e8214595/content.htm]
Regards
Kailas Ugale

Similar Messages

Purchasing Info Record- Different Regular Vendor for different Plant

Dear Guru,
I'm encounter a problem with PIR.
I have this PIR 9001 (Vendor A) and 9002 (Vendor B) for material A, which i have extended to 2 different Pur.Org 0001 under company code 0001 and Pur.Org 0002 uner Company code 0002.
For Pur.Org 0001, i set the Regular Vendor as Vendor A, but when i trying to set the regular vendor for Pur.Org 0002 to be as Vendor B, i receved the message as "Up to now, vendor A has been regular vendor for this material".
And After i changed this Regular vendor to vendor B, this changed have also affected the PIR for Pur. Org 0001.
Can i know if there is a way to change the PIR Regular vendor at Pur.Org or Plant level?
Thank you very much,
Regards,
Chee Wee

Hi,
Regular vendor is at client level.
That's why, you cann't maintain more then one vendor (Source of supply) for the same material.
If you want to maintin separate vendor for the each plant and same material combination, then don't activate / select regular vendor option in the info record. You have to maintain source list.
Sour list is nothing but a list of source of supplies for the specific plant and material combination with in the validity period of time. If there are more then one vendor for the specific plant and material combination for the same validity period of time, then you can activate fixed vendor option in the source list. Then at the time of creating PO, SAP will pick fixed vendor for the Plant and Material combination.
So first, system will check whether regular vendor is there for this material in the info record. If is there,system will pick regular vendor in the PO. If not, then system will check fixed vendor in the source list for the material and plant combination. If yes, then system will pick fixed vendor from the source list. If not system will propose all the vendors in the source list. If the source list it self not created, then user has to give vendor number manually.
Regards
KRK

Update Info record Regular vendor Flag

Hi,
Is there any option to update info record regular vendor flag while creating Purchase Order through ME21N.
All the user Exits I can see has ENIA and EINC as import parameters.
Can anyone help on it please.
Thanks,
Karthik

Hi Arminda.
Yes, they were set as you mentioned but the problem persist.
Best regards.
JB.

Urgent!!! Problem in regular expression for matching braces

Hi,
For the example below, can I write a regular expression to store getting key, value pairs.
example: ((abc def) (ghi jkl) (a ((b c) (d e))) (mno pqr) (a ((abc def))))
in the above example
abc is key & def is value
ghi is key & jkl is value
a is key & ((b c) (d e)) is value
and so on.
can anybody pls help me in resolving this problem using regular expressions...
Thanks in advance

"((key1 value1) (key2 value2) (key3 ((key4 value4)
(key5 value5))) (key6 value6) (key7 ((key8 value8)
(key9 value9))))"
I want to write a regular expression in java to parse
the above string and store the result in hash table
as below
key1 value1
key2 value2
key3 ((key4 value4) (key5 value5))
key4 value4
key5 value5
key6 value6
key7 ((key8 value8) (key9 value9))
key8 value8
key9 value9
please let me know, if it is not possible with
regular expressions the effective way of solving itYes, it is possible with a recursive regular expression.
Unfortunately Java does not provide a recursive regular expression construct.
$_ = "((key1 value1) (key2 value2) (key3 ((key4 value4) (key5 value5))) (key6 value6) (key7 ((key8 value8) (key9 value9))))";
my $paren;
   $paren = qr/
           [^()]+ # Not parens
         |
           (??{ $paren }) # Another balanced group (not interpolated yet)
    /x;
my $r = qr/^(.*?)$(\w+?) (\w+?|(??{$paren}))$\s*(.*?)$/;
while ($_) {
     match()
# operates on $_
sub match {
     my @v;
     @v = m/$r/;
     if (defined $v[3]) {
          $_ = $v[2];
          while (/\(/) {
               match();
          print "\"",$v[1],"\" \"",$v[2],"\"";
          $_ = $v[0].$v[3];
     else { $_ = ""; }
C:\usr\schodtt\src\java\forum\n00b\regex>perl recurse.pl
"key1" "value1"
"key2" "value2"
"key4" "value4"
"key5" "value5"
"key3" "((key4 value4) (key5 value5))"
"key6" "value6"
"key8" "value8"
"key9" "value9"
"key7" "((key8 value8) (key9 value9))"
C:\usr\schodtt\src\java\forum\n00b\regex>

Outline Agreements - min order qty and regular vendor flag

As a part of E Source Integration with ECC we are planning to leverageusing Outline Agreement(Contract Type MK) to store
Price and other Business Terms for Material / Vendor combinations. Currently we are
using Purchase Information Record with minimum order quantity and
regular vendor flag functionalities, and these are maintained manually.
We intend to use Minimum Order qty and Regular Vendor Flag
indicator in Outline Agreement as well, however noticed that these fields are
not available in the screens. Does anyone know if these fields can be enabled in an outline agreement?

Guys
thanks for reply..
But I thnik my question was not fully clear as the aswers didn't make sense to me...
As a logistics consultant .I know that I can maintain Min Order qty for a material + vendor at PIR level..
My question ..if I buy 10 items in a PO from a sinle vendor..is there any option to restrict Min qrder qty for these combination of materials..
or in other words vendor says he dont care about number of items ,but the lot lot should be min..10 cartons only..
appropriate points will be rewarded.
thanks in advance.

Problems with regular Texting since iOS 7.0.3

Hello, I have an iPhone 5s recently upgraded to iOS 7.0.3 via OTA update. I never use iMessage, I have an unlimited text plan, so I always have used SMS with everyone. However, after this last update, I have problems with regular SMS. I can send SMS to everyone as usual, but can only get text messages from some-all of them using iPhone 5 with at least the lastest iOS6 version. I have noticed then only way to text them now is to turn on iMessage, otherwise I keep missing their replies. These are people, that until the last upgrade, I was texting with on a regular basis with no problems using plain SMS with iMessage option OFF. Contrary to most, I don't want to use iMessage but rather use regular carrier provided SMS.
For instance, both my son and daughter use an iPhone 5 with iOS 7 (but not the latest patch 7.0.3) installed, I can text with my son OK, but can't get any texts from my daughter, can only communicate with her using iMessage-BTW, we are all on the same network on a family plan. Can't understand this at all. Since I can SMS with some, but not others I don't think this is a problem with my carrier but rather a problem with my phone since the update to 7.0.3, and they say I am the only one they have problem with texting with and I am the only one on the new software version.
Anyone else has noticed this issue.

I wonder if this may have something to do with iMessage on my Macs. Recently updated to Maverirks and the iMessage app on my Macs was set up to my email and mobile phone (it wasn't before). I wonder if this is so, then whoever I send an SMS to that has iMessage on and replies back, will be picked up by iMessage since is turned on on my Mac, since replies go to the Mac but not my phone. If the sender has iMessage off, I get the SMS fine.

ME05 : Generate Source List only for regular vendor

Dear guru ,
I use ME05 for the mass generation of source list.
For one material i have two info-records for different vendors.
If i run ME05 the system send this message u201CSeveral sources MRP-relevant on one dateu201D
and create two records in the source list for the same material.
Can i automatically create the source list only for the regular vendor fill for one of the info-record ?
Thanks in advance.

not answered

System to consider only regular vendors in rating

Dear Gurus,
During vendor rating at present system is considering all vendors who were not supplied for entire quarter(say).ie, system now showing the vendors who supplied one time, un supplied vendors. but the requirement is system has to consider only regular vendors in vendor evaluation. how can we put the restriction.

Analyse your vendors with MC$4 transaction.
then exclude the vendors who were only used one time via the multiple selection in your selection screen of report RM06LBAT

Regular vendor in MM

are there any setting in MM where there are settings for defining a regular vendor if yes where it is?

Regular vendor you can set in info record (ME11 or ME12) on general data screen
Regular vendor
Specifies that the material is to be procured from this vendor at client
    level, i.e. for the entire corporate group.
Use
If you set this indicator, the regular vendor is suggested as the only
    source.
If you wish to work with the source determination facility for purchasing
    documents, it makes sense not to set the indicator so that the system
    suggests all available sources, not just the regular vendor.
If you try to enter a different vendor than the regular vendor in the
    source list or quota arrangement, the system will issue a warning
    message.

Problem with Regular Expression

Hi There!!
I have a problem with regular expression. I want to validate that one word and second word are same. For that I have written a regex
Pattern p=Pattern.compile("([a-z][a-zA-Z]*)\\s\1");
Matcher m=p.matcher("nikhil nikhil");
boolean t=m.matches();
if (t)
          System.out.println("There is a match");
     else
          System.out.println("There is no match");
The result I am getting is always "There is no match
Your timely help will be much appreciated.
Regards

Ram wrote:
ErasP wrote:
You are missing a backward slash in the regex
Pattern p = Pattern.compile("([a-z][a-zA-Z]*)\\s\\1");
But this will fail in this case.
Matcher m = p.matcher("Nikhil Nikhil");It is the reason for that *[a-z]*.The OP had [a-z][a-zA-Z]* in his code, so presumably he know what that means and wants that String not to match.

Problem with customer/vendor clearing

Hi all,
We are launching the payment proposal for this month and we have found one issue related to the clearing customer/vendor.
The vendor invoices are filled in the Part. Bank Type with 1 or 2u2026, but the customer invoices has this field as blank.
In the payment proposal, the system does not clear both documents. It only considers vendor invoice.
We solve the issue temporally by changing manually the partner bank type for the customer invoices. Then the system considers both documents (vendor/customer).
Does anyone has an idea how to solve this problem?
Thanks in advance,
Soumaya

Hi,
I already tried this option.
But the problem is not only for one single customer, but for several ones.
Which means that if I am going to use this solution I will have to
maintain the Bank details for all customers master data which is a long process.
Any other suggestions?
Thanks,
Soumaya

Problem in uploading Vendor Email through FK01/FK02

Hello,
I have to upload vendor master. Everything gets uploaded except the email of the vendor. I have tried several ways: Bapi's, Recording, LSMW etc but nothing seems to be working. Please let me know how to upload the email address of the vendor.
Regards
Ritesh

Dear,
Solved the problem. Below is a sample code.
REPORT z_vendor_email_upload LINE-SIZE 170.
PARAMETERS: obj_id LIKE bapi4001_1-objkey DEFAULT '0000101625'.
PARAMETERS: e_mail LIKE bapiadsmtp-e_mail.
DATA: iad1vl TYPE bapiad1vl OCCURS 0 WITH HEADER LINE.
DATA: iadsmtp TYPE bapiadsmtp OCCURS 0 WITH HEADER LINE.
DATA: ret TYPE bapiret2 OCCURS 0 WITH HEADER LINE.
DATA: adrnr LIKE bapi4001_1-addr_no.
START-OF-SELECTION.
IF e_mail CA '@'.
    REFRESH iad1vl. CLEAR iad1vl.
    iad1vl-name = 'XYZ'.
    iad1vl-name_2 = ABC'.
    iad1vl-sort1 = 'XZ'.
    iad1vl-country = 'SG'.
    iad1vl-langu = 'EN'.
    APPEND iad1vl. CLEAR iad1vl.
    REFRESH iadsmtp. CLEAR iadsmtp.
    iadsmtp-e_mail = e_mail.
    APPEND iadsmtp. CLEAR iadsmtp.
    REFRESH ret. CLEAR ret.
    CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_ADDRESSORG_SAVEREPLICA'
      EXPORTING
        obj_type                          = 'LFA1'
        obj_id                            = obj_id
      OBJ_ID_EXT                        = ' '
        context                           = '0001'
      IV_CHECK_ADDRESS                  = 'X'
      IV_TIME_DEPENDENT_COMM_DATA       = ' '
     IMPORTING
       return                            = ret
       address_number                    = adrnr
      TABLES
        bapiad1vl                         = iad1vl
      BAPIADTEL                         =
      BAPIADFAX                         =
      BAPIADTTX                         =
      BAPIADTLX                         =
        bapiadsmtp                        = iadsmtp.
      BAPIADRML                         =
      BAPIADX400                        =
      BAPIADRFC                         =
      BAPIADPRT                         =
      BAPIADSSF                         =
      BAPIADURI                         =
      BAPIADPAG                         =
      BAPIAD_REM                        =
      BAPICOMREM                        =
      BAPIADUSE                         =
    IF ret-type NE 'E'.
      CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_TRANSACTION_COMMIT'
        EXPORTING
          wait = 'X'.
      IF sy-subrc = 0.
        WRITE: /'Email Updated'.
      ENDIF.
    ELSE.
      WRITE: / ret-type, ret-message, ret-message_v1, ret-message_v2.
    ENDIF.
ELSE.
    WRITE: /'Check Email Address. It is not correct'.
ENDIF.

Problem with a vendor in Withholding tax.

Dear Friends,
I'm facing a problem with Vendor # 152230 from company code IN10. This vendor is withholding tax, and as you may know, when a vendor is withholding tax, the system gives a message informing that the vendor is withholding tax.
With this particular vendor (Vendor # 152230), the system is not informing anything. Could you please check why this happens with this vendor, and others it does not?
Please help me in solving this issue.
Thanks a lot in advance to all!!

Hi,
Follow the menu path:
IMG>>>Financial accounting>>accounts receivable & accounts payable>>>vendor accounts>>>>master data>>>preparation for creating master data>>>define screen layout per activity(vendors)....the new window will open.............you select Change Vendor (centrally) and go for details .double click on the Company code data for checking Field status whether the Withholding Tax field is Suppressed or not......if not the make Optional and save it.
Again do the same thing for :IMG>>>Financial accounting>>accounts receivable & accounts payable>>>vendor accounts>>>>master data>>>preparation for creating master data>>>define account group screen layout (vendors)....the new window will open.............double click on the Company code data for checking Field status whether the Withholding Tax field is Suppressed or not......if not the make Optional and save it.
Now you check the GL field status(t.code OBC4) check whether the Withholding Tax field is Suppressed or not......if not the make Optional and save it.
I think your problem will be solved.
With Regards,
sudipto

Sorting problem in standard vendor search help

Hi all,
I'm enhancing the vendor search help.
I found that there is a sorting problem in the original standard search help.
The 1st time to search vendor in the search help returns a correct list, then I just sort the vendor in ascending order. This time the column name of the hit list changes and mismatch the actual values.
Any one faced this problem before?
What's wrong are there ?
Thanks.

Thanks Peluka.
But even I don't enhance the vendor search help, I still found that the original standard version has this problem after sorting.
Is that the program bug?
Have anyone encountered this problem before?

Workflow Problem (Accept the vendor bid).

Hi Guys,
I am activating Bid Invitation and Bid submission Using SRM 5.0.
Now Everything works fine i.e.:
- Strat purchaser creates Bid Invitation.
- One step bid invitation workflow is working fine.
- Approver can able to approve the bid invitation and publish sucessfully.
- Bidders can view this Bid Invitan and Submit their bids against it.
- Strat purchaser can see the submitted bids and accept and reject the bids.
The problem is:
The accepted bid (by Purchaser) should be approved by the manager.
The status of bid (submitted by Vendor) is showing as "awaiting for approval" and in Approver preview it is showning the name of the Approver who has to approve that bid.
But the inbox of that Approver is empty. So approver can not approve that bid and go ahead.
I have activated the workflow WS79000002 One step approval of bid and start conditions of workflow WS790000002.
Can you please tell me which workflow , task or assignment I am missing??
Thanks & Regards,
Apparao. A
Message was edited by:
Apparao A

Dear Sindy,
the main question is where you have created the approver allocation, we miss many details:
1. Workflow step
- for each step you allocate the step in the worklow builder to the agent
2. or customizing on vendor side (application)
- details are needed to be looked for customizing
I think we need further details how you evaluate the agents.
Regards
Tibor

Problem in Regular vendor

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for