Problem in settlement of Refurbishment order

Hi Gurus,
I have problem in the settlement (KO88) of refurbishment order. I am getting error " Final delivery not entered for the order. It is not technically completed"
Message no. KD258
But i have already done final delivery in T-code IW8W & Technical Completion is already done.
So why i am getting this error.
Kindly help me in this matter.
Regards,
Vivek

Hi Vivek
As its a refurbishment order , after completing your all maintenance work , refurbished part to be send back to storage location , this is called as **FINAL DELIVERY ** in refurbish,
After that you can do a technical completion and go for settlement.
Shail

Similar Messages

Cost of sales not getting generated during final settlement of refurbishment order

Hi
We use refurbishment Order and we have settlement receiver as PSG. We use RA Key. We use raw material components CE 1, , We confirm debit labor,
we also receive Revenue cost element category 11 .
We have RA key assigned in the Order.
Now We ran and save values of RA and run KO88 and Dr. WIP Cr. Cons offset is credited. this is when the status is REL and when the status is TECO, then we calculate RA and run KO88 RA is reversed. Now COGS is not getting populated at all and there is no CO PA document also. Kindly let me know the configuration needed for this purpose. I need this very urgently.
This is a simple scenario and this no connection with SD as of now.
Aparaajith

Hi Szymon
We have 3 types of refurbishment order type
1. External Consulting services
Here the cost of labor, consulting charges are booked against this service order
Since the job is done more than 2 months then at the end of 1st month WIP is calculated
2nd month job is done -TECO, so the reverse WIP and cost of Sales comes into play.
Here they book revenue against the service order. Since MTO is not used here, based on status of the order TECO, they create billing request and billing where service order is the cost object
So Service Orders hold costs 2nd month end rev and cost.
My problem is the RA what I use does not create Cost of Sales automatically I know there is some configuration is wrong.
2nd issue: CO PA does not get created when I do TECO and consequently I am unable to move sales and cost of sales to copa.
2. third party repair
Here there is no link between sales order and refurbishment order.
So no revenue is booked for this refurbishment order
Next they issue material and move to WIP and 2nd month they move the cost to COS ,reverse WIP>
I use a RA key which does move COS creation of entry.
This is my problem
How to move to COS without revenue and I will create manually 2nd month by using a report to take TECO status and then create revenue entries through SD.
I need response very soon, if you can give me.
Aparaajith

Problem in settlement of rework order

Hi
I have raised a production order and settled all the products in the order. But in quality inspection i have cleared only some quantity and made some quantity rework. I have raised a rework order for the same and settled the rework order.But the quantity is not settled to the main production order.Where is the problem in the rework order
Regards,
PradeepM.

Hi Pradeep,
Are you expecting
1. the rework cost in the rework order to be settled to the parent order or
2. the confirmed quantity in the rework order to be added to the parent order.
Up to my knowIedge I dont think the 2nd point will happen.
Let us confirm with other Experts opinion.
BR,
UK

Settlement of Refurbishment Order?

Dear SAPIENTS,
I have created Refurbishment and processed the refurbishment order and now when i am going to settle the maintenance order its giving me the error Final delivery not entered for the order. It is not technically completed . But I have already TECO the order and refurbished material posted to the specified storage location. Also confirmation done. Delivered quantity is showing 2 in maintenance order.
Can anyone suggest what can be the reason for this error.
Regards,

Hi
please check in the order if you have assigned RAK by mistake or check in the profile
there should not be any RAK in the order profile sicne this a maintenance order not production order
it is related to settlement profile only
Regards
pratap

Settlement is done of Refurbishment order.

Hi Gurus,
I have created a Refurbishment order issued the spares,done the GR also done the technically completed but while doing the settlement ko88 the error comes as "Final delivery not entered for the order. It is not technically completed".Pls suggest what are the thing i need to check for this.

Hi,
Please refer to below threads for your reference.
Refurbishment order cost settle error
Message KD258 - Settle Process Order by KO88
Hope this would solve your problem.
Regards,

Can we settle refurbishment order periodically

Hi All
our client want to settle refurbishment order periodically to material.
In standard SAP will allow this after TECO.
They r taking more time to complete these orders and costs are setteled in Orders and not reflecting in monthly cost balance sheet.
can we settele initially to one separate cost center and tranfer cost (oder wise ) to material after teco.
It should reflect that the cost should be reduced in cost center and updated in material

Hi,
Please note that in refurbishment case cost is settled to material and this settlement need to be periodic.
You can do settlement after TECO. TECO is technical completion and settlement can be done after TECO also.
However as you said cost are settled to cost centre ,but how it is possible coz settlement receiver is material and not cost centre for refurbishment.They may not able to see correct costs in respective period but cost will always get settled to material(means added to inventory accounts after settlement).
It is advisable to settle incurred costs on refurbishment order as early as possible,so costs will reflect into inventory accounts and within correct period and this is standard practice also.
regds,
atul
Edited by: Atul Mali on Apr 15, 2009 1:52 PM

Can we settle refurbishment order(Plant Maintenance) periodically

Hi All
our client want to settle refurbishment order periodically to material.
In standard SAP will allow this after TECO.
They r taking more time to complete these orders and costs are setteled in Orders and not reflecting in monthly cost balance sheet.
can we settele initially to one separate cost center and tranfer cost (oder wise ) to material after teco.
It should reflect that the cost should be reduced in cost center and updated in material
Thanks in advance
gangs

Hi,
this seems like a WIP (work in progress) scenario, maybe you can try a results analysis version.
best regards,
Luis

Refurbishment Order Problem

Dear All,
I am facing a problem regarding refurbishment order; while creating an order i am unable to provide the data in delivery quantity as the field is not modifiable;
Also after issuing the component by mb1a and movement type 261; i issue the component from stock with a specific valuation type; but after technical completion i am not getting the updated stock in other valuation type.Do i have to post the refurbished material to desired valuation type manually; or it is automatically updated after i technically confirm the maintenance order.
Regards
Praveen kr. Dhankar

Hi bala
No. i havent done it so far; but after reading your post i did run the transaction.Thanks for the early reply
Will let you know the road blocks i am facing down from here.
Thanks
Praveen kr. Dhankar

Refurbishment order- Actual settlement

Dear Experts,
When i am trying to do actual settlement using the transaction code KO88 for the refurbishment order for which even after the techical completion and the IW8W (Goods receipt) done, system is throwing the following error:
Final delivery not entered for the order. It is not technically completed
Message no. KD258
Diagnosis
If you want to settle a production order to a material, you must first either enter the final delivery for it, or close (complete) it technically because settlement leads to an update of the moving average price for the material. The total delivery quantity is required for this. If the order is one which cannot be delivered because, for example, it produces 100% scrap, you can close it technically instead. Settlement is than to the price difference account.
By the settlement period, no final delivery had been entered for this order, nor had it been technically closed (completed). This means that you cannot settle it.
Procedure
Before settling, either set the order to "Technically completed" or enter the final delivery.
Please help me out...
Regards,
Suresh.
Edited by: Suresh Babu on Jan 5, 2009 4:28 PM
Edited by: Suresh Babu on Jan 5, 2009 4:31 PM

Hi,
When i am changing the settlement period from 12 2008 to 01 2009 , it is throwing the following error:
Please throw your ideas what could be reason?
Account determination for entry 1000 PRD ____ PRF 1300 not possible
Message no. M8147
Diagnosis
The system did not find an account for this transaction. This means that the account determination for key 1000 PRD ____ PRF 1300 is not maintained in MM Customizing (Valuation). The key is made up of:
Chart of account
Transaction key (= Posting transaction)
Valuation grouping code
Account grouping code
Valuation class
System response
The system cannot update a G/L account for this transaction. You cannot post the transaction.
Procedure
Contact your system administrator.
If you have the authorization, check the Account determination in Customizing for Valuation.
Proceed
Note
The relevant posting transaction can be found in Table T030A.

Problems with Trading partner when settling an internal order

Hi experts,
We are trying to settle an internal order to a G/L account. For this account there is a validation defined, which states error when the trading partner is not entered. Hovewer we cannot change or cancel the validation for business reasons. We cannot use a different G/L account for settlement neither.
Is there any chance to add the trading partner in the order settlement rule? Any other ideas?
Thank you,
Michal

Since you cannot disable the validation and cannot use any other GL account, use a substitution as Sridhar suggested. I am adding to this that trading partner is either assigned at header level or line item level. In this case since it is internal order settlement, I guess it has to be at the header level since it is not cross company. For cross company, the trading partner is automatically filled in so rule that out.
That leaves us with the option of substituting TP at the header level. You can use settlement document type as a condition to bring in a trading partner.
In the worst case if the validation is coming before the substitution kicks in, consider modifying the validation to put exclusions for settlement process, say, use business transaction for example.
Regards
Sharabh

Account requires an assignment to a CO object as settle a refurbishment ord

We have an outstanding refurbishment order which can't be settled. The system gave a message like "Account XXX requires an assignment to a CO object". In settlement rule, the refurbished material was set as a receiver. Others refurbishment order were normal and can be settled. We have checked the configuration of settlement profile and cost allocation structure. No problem was found. Where can I start to solve it? Any comments will be appriciated!

Hi
Same problem we have automated by work flow
Is there any ocst on order ?
what we have a found a way that this order is to be confimred & materiral issued to be posted only after work order gets teco
We have valutaion type material c3 as price =001 which is lowest
so in between if the order is settled there is now cost
& if the work is finished then it will automatically settled by work flow
Regards
Pratap bhikaji

Account Assignment Category MAT for refurbishment order

Hi friends,
At tcode OKO6 (customizing of Settlement cost elements), Allocation structures, Assignments, Settlement cost elements, Receiver cat. - Input help (F1)
I need to find the object type 'MAT' for account assignment category that will be used by the refurbishment orders settlement profile (order type 30).
The problem: the object type 'MAT' is not available at the input help list.
The object type 'MAT' is in the table TBO01 and it is assigned to TBO01-OBART but it does not appear in the OKO6 input help list.
Your suggestions will be welcome.
Regards,
Roberto

Yes, you are right. It is necessary to create or modify a settlement profile and to do the assignments like Allocation structure and the Default object type (in my case it has to be 'MAT' for material) in tcode OKO7. It was customized without problem.
But before to run tcode OKO7 we have to run tcode OKO6 and create the Allocation structure. It was done but we could not do the assignment to the object type MAT because the input help (F4) does not show this option. The help shows many options like ORD (order), CTR (cost center), FXA (asset), G/L (G/L account), etc., but the MAT option does not appear.
How to make the object type MAT available in the Receiver cat. in Settlement cost elements in tcode OKO6???
Regards,
Roberto

Valuation type after refurbished order

Hi All,
I have done a refurbishment order from valuation type C1 to valuation type C2. After settle the order the average moving price was updated, so till now is everything ok.
If I'll display the equipment, in serial number data tab, "Stock Batch" and "Master Batch" remains in the old valuation (in my case C1). In MMBE I have the correct quantities in C1 and C2 stock.
Does any one know what is the problem and how to solve it?
Regards,
Rogério Reis

HI
Have you posted the material by IW8W or not
What is screen you are getting at posting the tocde IW8W
IT will indiacte to you from whcih valuatio type to which type you want to post the material
check the valutaion type you entered in Refurbsihemnt order whether it is C1 to c2 coeerctly (ihope c1 is scrapped ,c2 Refurbised ,c3 -New )
check
Regards
chandrasehkhar

Error while creating Refurbishment Order

Dear Frnds,
I am trying to create a refurbishment order, while creating its throwing an error message "Valuation type SP_REP does not allow in-house production".
I have done the following steps.
1. Created order in IW31 with order type PM04.
2. Mentioned the Material number, plant and business area.
3. In Create Refurbishment order: Central Header screen mentioned the plant details in Refurbishment sub screen.
From Plant 1000 Storage Location 1050 Val. type: SP_REP
To plant 1000 Storage Location 1050 Val. type: SP_Ind
at that time its thronging the above error message.
What could be the problem for that? And also can any one explain me the detailed procedure for the refurbishment order?
Thanks in advance
Praveen.

If I try removing the Valuation type in the Order Header Screen, The order is taking a valuation type that is "IM_OWNPROD".
I have checked in SPRO order types and other settings but i did not find anything related to Valuation type and Order.
Where this setting is done in SPRO, I need to remove the default valuation type in the order.
Please help me.
Thanks in Advance,
B. Praveen

Settlement of PM order over Internal order

In order to control revenue budget from being over run we have developed Internal orders in controlling with the combination of Cost Centre & GL Code. The internal order are statistical in nature.
We are facing the following problem:
1. In PM order (IW31) settlement rule is defined as following:
                  1.1     CAT "Order"
                  1.2     Settlement Receiver "3440-2360010 3440"
                  1.3     Amount 1000
                  1.4     Settlement Type is Full
2. The problem occurs when there are different internal orders
3. After we run settlement rule (KO88) it runs successfully.
4. KSB1 report shows that the amount is split among all the settlement receivers
5. Whereas requirement is that amount against a particular internal order should be charged to its GL account and cost centre only.

Dear Sreenivas Kadiam,
I go to spro-----Plant Maintenance and Customer Service--Maintenance and Service Processing---Basic Settings----
General Order Settlement------Maintain Allocation Structures.
The following allocation structures are already defined:
A1     CO allocation structure
A2     No split
PM     PM allocation structure
PR     PARCO Allocation Structure
I could not find the (settlement cost elements setting should be 'BY COST ELEMENT' for receiver category ORD.)
Please advise
Regards
Aftab Ahmed Khan

Problem in settlement of Refurbishment order

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for