Problem: Multiple sessions per user (automatic) ?

Hi guys,
I have a very bad behavior with multiple sessions in SRM 4.0 sp8.
The problem is:
1. When the employee enter into the system one session is created
2. The same employee click the "Shop" link and a 2nd. session is created for the same user !
3. The same employee click the catalog link (CCM) and a 3rd. session is created !
Anybody knows how to solve this ?
Thank you !!!
Kind regards,
diego

Diego
When you logged in first time, it creates one session.
But after that if you navigate to different transactions it shows in the second session.But it does not open new session for each link(ie Shop, confirmation, etc). Instead old session closes and new session opens.
When it comes to CCM, obviously new session opens as you are connecting to new application by keeping open the existing one(Shop).
But how does it matter to your application?
Does it show any impact on the performance?
Regards
Jagadish

Similar Messages

Clustered WL 6.1 creates 2 server sessions per user

          It appears that WL 6.1 creates 2 HTTP sessions per user for a simple JSP object.
          It shows in "ADmin Console/mydomain> DefaultWebApp> Web Applications> DefaultWebApp>
          Servlet Runtimes":
          1 /count.jsp
          1 /*.jsp
          In a non-clustered environment this does not happen.
          Is that normal?


I found the problem myself. For some reason WL did not like any special characters in the system password. I am not sure which ones are valid and which are not but I am avoiding them all right now.

Single Database Session Per User in ADF/BC Application

Hi, I am using ADF with BC (JDeveloper 11.1.1.1). My application contains multiple application modules, each connected to the same JDBC data source. On the app server, I have configured the data source to use Identity Based Connection Pooling.
My current configuration is resulting in numerous database sessions for each user. I have a requirement to use only a single database session per user HTTP session. Is there any way to configure the application modules to achieve this?
Thanks,
Brad

Hi,
use a single root Am module and make sure the others are used as nested modules. This will create a single connection
Frank

How to realize only one identical remoteApp per session per user per computer?

If a terminalserver 2008 R1 is configured for only one session per user, everything works like it should if the user connects using the 'normal' remotedesktop session. A second connect with the same credentials kicks the first connect.
If a remoteApp is used instead of the 'normal' connect, it's possible to start multiple instances of this app within one user a least from one computer. mstsc do run multiple times and seem to link in the existent connection without kicking it. How to change
that?
Continuative:
The started RemoteApp checks the mutex of all started processes and stops herself if a process is found with the same mutex. This prevents multiple instances of this app within one user with the same sessionID. If a terminalserver is configured for only
one session per user, this RemoteApp shouldn't start multiple within one user. Using a "normal" remote desktop session the app doesn't start more than one time, I tested it. Used as RemotApp, the app starts multiple! Possibly I'm able to change this behaviour
with a code fix instead of configuring terminal services. Any tips regarding mutex and terminalservers?

Hi,
I tested the following code and it is working for me both in a RemoteApp and Full session:
Imports System.Threading
Module Main
Sub Main()
Dim createdNew As Boolean
Dim m As New Mutex(True, "TPMutex", createdNew)
If Not createdNew Then
Return
End If
Application.Run(Form1)
GC.KeepAlive(m)
End Sub
End Module
-TP

Limit the number of session per user in the Wired dot1x environment with ISE 1.2

Hello,
I need to check if there is any configuration/workaround to limit the number of sessions/access per user in the Wired dot1x configuration.
I need to check if this feature is available or not to solve the following scenario:
I have 2 SW ports configured to use dot1x authentication with ISE 1.2 server.
If user A connects to the 1st port and authenticated then he will placed on a VLAN based on the authorization profile.
The case, that I need to deny the same user to connect on a different machine with the same credentials.
The ISE itself does not have this feature currently, the only feature available is to limit the number of sessions for the guest user.
Is there any workaround on the Cisco switches to solve this? Cisco WLC has this feature and for the VPN we can limit the number of sessions also from the ASA itself.
Thanks.

limit number of session per user using wired dot1x is not available in 1.3

No of Concurrent Sessions Per User Mismatch with profile settings

Hi
DB Version Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.1.0 - 64bit Production
OS RHES 5U2
I created a profile MYPROFILE and set the value of Concurrent Sessions (Per User) to 30. DB was bounced after creating the profile. I made this profile default for a particular user "MYUSER". I verified that by querying DBA_USERS (select profile from dba_users where username like 'MYUSER') I checked v$session with that particular user after sometime and noticed that it was showing 34 sessions. Some ACTIVE and some INACTIVE.
My question is, if I have set the maximum limit of concurrent sessions per user to 30 in myprofile and made this the default profile for MYUSER, then how come i am still able to see more than 34 sessions of myuser regardless of the status? I am not sure if this is relevant or not but the IDLE TIME is set to 15 minutes.
Thank you for your help
Edited by: user560883 on Jul 4, 2010 12:45 AM

user560883 wrote:
Hi
DB Version Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.1.0 - 64bit Production
OS RHES 5U2
I created a profile MYPROFILE and set the value of Concurrent Sessions (Per User) to 30. DB was bounced after creating the profile. I made this profile default for a particular user "MYUSER". I verified that by querying DBA_USERS (select profile from dba_users where username like 'MYUSER';) I checked v$session with that particular user after sometime and noticed that it was showing 34 sessions. Some ACTIVE and some INACTIVE.
My question is, if I have set the maximum limit of concurrent sessions per user to 30 in myprofile and made this the default profile for MYUSER, then how come i am still able to see more than 34 sessions of myuser regardless of the status? I am not sure if this is relevant or not but the IDLE TIME is set to 15 minutes.
Thank you for your helpDid you set the parameter resource_limit=true ? You must do it before you test sessions_per_user. You can do so like the following,
alter system set resource_limit=true;After this again try and post the feedback.
HTH
Aman....

Maximum Number of Sessions per User

I am using OAM 11.1.1.5.0 running on Solaris 10. When we change the "Maximum Number of Sessions per User" to 1 (per customer requirement), a user is restricted to having one active OAM session at a time (as expected). However, if the user does not explicitly log out (e.g. they just close their browser), they are unable to log back in to OAM until their existing OAM session times-out/expires. Given the above max sessions of 1 requirement, is it possible to config OAM to auto-kill the user's session and create a new one if they attempt to login before their initial OAM session times-out/expires? This was possible in Sun's Access Manager. Is it possible in Oracle's OAM? Thank you in advance for your reply.

Hi,
Maximum session per user 0-9 and how can configure see the below link:-
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/en/97/76a341ac57ef0be10000000a1550b0/content.htm
Regards,
Anil

Serious problem with TSCAL per user Licensing (Event 4105 on Licenseserver)

Hello,
i've got a problem with Terminalservice-Licensing: We migrated our AD from W2003 to W2008. At the same time, we updated our Terminalservice-Licenseserver to W2008 (Memberserver, no DC). We are using per-user TSCAL licensing. The problem is, that for (nearly) every user that logs on to a W2008 Terminalserver, an event 4105 is generated in the eventlog of the Licenseserver, that means that the licence server cannot update the ad user properties when he delivers the cals.
We have discovered that the terminalserver-licenceserver group is under the security properties of the user listed but has no rights. For new created users the rights "terminalserver-licenceserver read/write" are correctly set and for those users no event 4105 is generated. The problem is, that License-reporting (usage) is only working for those newly created accounts and not for old ones. Why doesn't the terminalserver-licenceserver group have the rights to modify the Terminalserver-AD attributes for older accounts (these accounts were created when the domain-level was W2003)??? Is there a workaround or hotfix from Microsoft to correct the securitysettings ??
Many thanks
Ralf

Hello Ralf,
Thanks for your post in our forum.
Based on my understanding on your post, you have met the following issue:
You have migrated the Active Directory domain from Windows Server 2003 to Windows Server 2008; You have also upgraded the Terminal Server License Server from Windows Server 2003 to Windows Server 2008. After that, when the existing terminal users access the Terminal Server, an Event ID 4105 is logged to claim that the License Server fails to update the AD user’s properties.
According to the analysis on the second paragraph of your post, I think it is a known issue caused by insufficient permissions of the migrated users created in Windows Server 2003 domain environment. As you’ve found, the permissions required are for the Terminal Services Licensing Servers
group:
· Read Terminal Server license server
· Write Terminal Server license server
To fix this issue, please give these two permissions to the existing users.
After that, please confirm if the License Usage Report is working for the old users.
For more information about Event ID 4105, please refer to:
Event ID 4105 — Terminal Services Per User Client Access License Tracking and Reporting
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc775179(WS.10).aspx
Please feel free to let me know if I can provide any further assistance. Thank you for your cooperation.
Lionel Chen
TechNet Subscriber Support in forum
If you have any feedback on our support, please contact [email protected]

Can't limit the number of simultaneous sessions per user

Hi,
I am using Cisco ACS 4.0 as a radius server that authenticate users for Internet access.
Microsoft ISA 2004 is used as Radius client.
When users tries to connect to Internet, the ISA Server forwards requests to Radius server (Cisco ACS) for authentication.
I have constated that some users communicates their passwords to permit acces to Internet for non authorized users.
Even, I have selected Max Sessions property in Cisco ACS to 1 for every user, I can see clearly on ISA 2004 that the same user/password is used from multiple PCs simultaneously.
Internet acess on my company is based on a user / password authentication, and IP adresses are provided by DHCP server.
Can you help by advising me how to limit every user using the internet to only a single session at any time, by using ISA 2004 (proxy) and Cisco ACS 4.0 (Radius Server).
Thank you.
Mustapha.

Limiting every user using the internet to only a single session at a time is not possible with a radius server. You will need to use the proxy server (ISA server) for this task.

How to kill particular Oracle Session from the multiple Session of User

Hi,
I am working on Web Application using ASP.NET , C# with Oracle. I am excuting queries from multiple connection of same user. I want to kill particular user session. I have tried to Kill session by using ALTER SYSTEM KILL SESSION 'sid,serial#' it is working fine but how can i identify which session is generated by particular connection so that i can kill that particular session.
Suppose there us user 'abc' there are multple instance of this user and all are active but same USERNAME. So Please tell me how can i identify that session through which i am executing the query.
Thanks,
Nitin

Some ideas for how to pick the right session:
-Look at the time the session was connected (logon_time)
-Look at the time the session last started it's most recent statement (last_call_et)
-Look at the sql that the session is running (join with sql_address and sql_hash_value over to v$sqltext_with_newlines or one of the other views that show you the sql they are running)
That usually gets me most of the way, if it's possible to distinguish them. ("Yeah I just started this query and I want you to kill it." is different than "I started five different queries at about the same time and I'm not sure which one I need killed.")

Session per user = 1 is not working in database ?

Dear All,
A profile has been configured on database with parameter session_per_user=1 but it is not working on database.
user can make n number of session to database . what could be the reason profile is not working ?
Please sugeest the solution .....
Regards,
Rajesh
Edited by: Rajesh.Rathod on Mar 17, 2009 3:34 AM

You have to alter resource_limit to true
Look fo rmore details in metalink note 745752.1

Single session per user

To demo my product, I put usernames and passwords right on the login page. I don't want people getting confused by the result when the same user is trying to do two different transactions, so I'd like to restrict each username to one session at a time. If someone tries to login with a username already in use, I need to reject their login.
Is there a way to do this?
Thanks.
Bill

Bill,
Better keep that PayPal account up-to-date. Sounds to me like you don't want SQL executed within any HTML DB session to be able to delete/update the same rows in tables or insert new rows when the timeframe between session creation and logout (or the final page visit of the session, e.g., user closes browser) overlaps with the similarly bounded timeframe of another HTML DB session.
HTML DB can't help you with this, there is no concept of an "active" session or "session in use".
You'd have to do something like insert a row into an ACCOUNT_IN_USE table when one of your accounts is "logged into", then delete the row when the logout takes place. Insert the row using a new process on the login page (raise error on dup key) and delete the row when the user clicks a logout link that should take them a logout confirmation page, which when submitted, deletes the row and redirects to the logout URL that you currently see in the Logout navbar icon. Replace the target of that navbar icon with a link to your new logout page. And then manually run a reset procedure to delete all the rows after so many users have not "actively" logged out but just closed their browsers and went home.
Scott

Per Session / per User shaping and queuing not working on 7206/7204 on 15.2

Hello,
we are running the following scenario - to provide QoS (shaping/queueing) for our broadband (pppoe) users, we have configured several service-policies on our 7206/7204 BRAS-Routers. The service-policies are applied with RADIUS-Attributes when the pppoe-users dials in. The service-policies look like this
policy-map POL-BM-DEF-P_4m-DSCP-OUT
description << Parent Policy 4 mbps >>
class class-default
shape average 3900000
bandwidth 3900
   service-policy POL-BM-DEF-C_4m-DSCP-OUT
policy-map POL-BM-DEF-C_4m-DSCP-OUT
description << Child Policy 4 mbps >>
class CM-VO-DEF-DSCP
priority 900
police cir 900000
   conform-action transmit
   exceed-action drop
class CM-VS-DEF-DSCP
bandwidth 100
class CM-ID-DEF-DSCP
bandwidth 900
class CM-MS-DEF-DSCP
bandwidth 600
class CM-MC-DEF-DSCP
bandwidth 300
class CM-NC-DEF-DSCP
bandwidth 150
class CM-NM-DEF-DSCP
bandwidth 150
class class-default
bandwidth 800
We are applying the policies with the following Cisco-AV-Pair attribute
lcp:interface-config=service-policy output POL-BM-DEF-P_4m-DSCP-OUT
Until recently that did work pretty good when using software 12.2(33)SRC3. But it turned out that there is a bug in this software that causes that the policy is applied but not working correct sometimes. See bug CSCsv27825. Although that bug does not match the software we are using, the symptoms do. Basically the parent shaper is not working, so there is no backpressure, no need for qos to kick in ;-)
The recommendation was to upgrade to Version 15.2(4)M5. When downloading the image there was a recommendation on the website to use Version 15.2(4)M6 instead, because of some important bugfixes. So we installed that, system cmes back online, everything works - except the service-policies. they are not applied at all any more.
After doing some tests it turns out that
- Policies that shape are not applied. It does not matter if using the ip:sub-qos-policy-out=xxx or lcp:interface-config=service-policy output xxx attribute.
- Policies that police like the one here are applied
policy-map POL-POLICE-DEF-P_1M-DSCP-OUT
class class-default
police 1000000
We prefer the shaping way, because of the smoother handling of bursty traffic.
Any ideas/recommendations ? I've tbeen readign a litte bit on the internet - that problem is not new, but unfortunately no one has a solution :-(
Best regards
Carsten
Short update: as soon as some queuing configuration is present in the policy (parent and/or child) it is not applied. i tried to be extra clever and combine the "policer" parent policy with our child-policy which does priority queuing - not applied. Even the parent-policy alone with no child policy (just the shaper) is not gettign applied.
Any ideas what to debug to get a reason why it is not working ?

Please Ignore Spelling errors. "I asked" replaced "It asked".
Please Reply as soon as Possible !

No session per user

hello
our application uses UIX + BC4J (jdev 9.0.5.2)
we are using JAZN for authentication through Oracle OID
How can i prevent a specific OID user from loggin more than once to the application... I cannot use Oracle profiles as Oracle profile use database users. All our users have the same URL in JDBC and hence the same database user
please help

Hi,
U can do that with Profile.
Check the table dba_profiles, u'll find SESSION_PER_USER in the
field RESOURCE_NAME.
If u want different value for each user, make one profile by
user.
Bye,
Fred DENIS

Enabling single session per user

I am using the following to load the event
java oracle.apps.fnd.wf.WFXLoad -u appluser @ppluser 10.3.4.45.+preprod.ke.dipl.com:1562:TEST thin US \ $FND_TOP/patch/115/xml/US/icxevte.wfx
and getting the error
Connecting to [email protected]+preprod.ke.dipl.com:1562:TEST -- UTF8
Unable to connect to 10.3.4.45.+preprod.ke.dipl.com:1562:TEST
appluser is the application user name, @ppluser the password, 10.3.4.45 ip (single node) preprod.ke.dipl.com the fully qualified domain name TEST the SID

Please post the details of the application release, database version and OS.
java oracle.apps.fnd.wf.WFXLoad -u appluser @ppluser 10.3.4.45.+preprod.ke.dipl.com:1562:TEST thin US \ $FND_TOP/patch/115/xml/US/icxevte.wfx
and getting the error
Connecting to [email protected]+preprod.ke.dipl.com:1562:TEST -- UTF8
Unable to connect to 10.3.4.45.+preprod.ke.dipl.com:1562:TEST
appluser is the application user name, @ppluser the password, 10.3.4.45 ip (single node) preprod.ke.dipl.com the fully qualified domain name TEST the SIDPlease source the application env file before running this command. Also, make sure you pass the correct SID, Database port number, database IP Address (or hostname).
The correct syntax is:
$ java oracle.apps.fnd.wf.WFXLoad -u apps <apps password> <host>:<port>:<SID> "thin" US $FND_TOP/patch/115/xml/US/icxevte.wfx
Interview Notifications are not Working in Release 12.1 [ID 1065114.1]
Thanks,
Hussein

Problem: Multiple sessions per user (automatic) ?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for