Problem of Toplink cache

when we try to get a object form DB by Toplink, the number of sub-object is doubule or treble,
for example: object User and object Role are many-to-many Mapping relation,get User form DB,sometime returns 4 Roles,sometime 8 Roles or 12 Roles, but the correct result is 4 Roles.
I don't konw why.

Yes,have only 4 unique rows in the relation table,this problem doesn't happened debug in Eclipse,just appeared on OC4J,so i suspect this is cache problem,
the query code:
//get the ClientSession
ClientSession cs = getClientSession();
Expression exp = (new ExpressionBuilder()).get("oid").equal(oid);
User user= cs.readObject(User.class, exp);
the User class:
public class User extends BaseEntity {
     private String ID;
     private String localName;
     private String firstName;
     private String lastName;
     private String stat;
     private String email;
     private String phone;
     private String fax;
     private String sourceAppCode;
     private Date lastLoginRangeBegin;
     private Date lastLoginRangeEnd;
     private ArrayList roleList;
     public String getID() {
          return ID;
     public void setID(String id) {
          ID = id;
     public void setStat(String stat) {
          this.stat = stat;
     public String getStat() {
          return stat;
     public void setEmail(String email) {
          this.email = email;
     public String getEmail() {
          return email;
     public void setPhone(String phone) {
          this.phone = phone;
     public String getPhone() {
          return phone;
     public void setFax(String fax) {
          this.fax = fax;
     public String getFax() {
          return fax;
     public void setSourceAppCode(String sourceAppCode) {
          this.sourceAppCode = sourceAppCode;
     public String getSourceAppCode() {
          return sourceAppCode;
     public void setRoleList(ArrayList roleList) {
          this.roleList = roleList;
     public ArrayList getRoleList() {
          return roleList;
     public void setLastLoginRangeBegin(Date lastLoginRangeBegin) {
          this.lastLoginRangeBegin = lastLoginRangeBegin;
     public Date getLastLoginRangeBegin() {
          return lastLoginRangeBegin;
     public void setLastLoginRangeEnd(Date lastLoginRangeEnd) {
          this.lastLoginRangeEnd = lastLoginRangeEnd;
     public Date getLastLoginRangeEnd() {
          return lastLoginRangeEnd;
     public void setLocalName(String localName) {
          this.localName = localName;
     public String getLocalName() {
          return localName;
     public void setFirstName(String firstName) {
          this.firstName = firstName;
     public String getFirstName() {
          return firstName;
     public void setLastName(String lastName) {
          this.lastName = lastName;
     public String getLastName() {
          return lastName;
}

Similar Messages

  • Problem width topLink cache

    I have a problem width TopLink.
    I update a record width a native query:
    Query q = em.createNativeQuery(sql);
    q.executeUpdate();
    After this when I try to read the records width (in other moment of my program)
    ordenes = (List<com.snack.ordenAp.persistence.OrdenAprovisionamiento>) query.getResultList();
    The values on the record are the same before the update.
    how I can clear the cache ?

    Use em.clear() to detach all entities associated to the context, essentially clearing the context's cache (but not the shared 2nd level cache if it is being used). You can also call em.refresh() on individual entities, or use a query hint query.setHint(QueryHints.REFRESH, true) to refresh all the results returned. Be aware that any changes made to entities in the context so far will not be persisted. You might want to call flush if there are changes you wish to keep.
    Best Regards,
    Chris

  • Toplink cache coordination problem with opmn lookup

    Dear all,
    We encounter some problems when we use opmn url and jms to realize the toplink cache coordination.
    Scenario:
    1. Using oracle application server 10g, create three processes(jvm) on one oc4j instance
    2. Using oc4j in memory jms server for cache coordination
    3. Using opmn url to lookup jms topic connection factory and connection, opmn url: opmn:ormi://shasudv4:6004:OC4J_TTS/tts
    When we start oc4j instance, we find the log, all the toplink cache coordination properites has been set to toplink framework, and remote command manager has been initialized successfully. All in memory jms server has also been started successfully, there are three listeners on the topic.
    But, when we test the synchronization, the data can't be synchronized between all the processes, two of them is ok, the rest of them has some problem to coordinate with the other two. There are no exceptions, we have set the level of toplink log to 'all'.
    I have checked the thread dump, I find that "HTTPThreadGroup", "RMICallHandler" and "JMSRequestHandler" threads are involved in cache synchronization.
    So, we are obliged to change the opmn url to ormi url, so we can only set a bound for rmi ports of processes, because the ormi port is dynamicly assigned.
    &lt;port id="rmi" range="12405-12407" /&gt;
    This seems ok, and involved thread are: "RMICallHander" and "JMSRequestHandler". But we also concern that we have restricted the port bound of ormi port of every instance.
    Thanks of any advice.

    I raised a TAR with Oracle. The short answer is that you can't do cache coordination either with ADF business objects, or with Toplink Essentials (as opposed to Oracle Toplink, which doesn't yet support JPA).

  • Toplink Cache problem

    I am using JDev of following version "Studio Edition Version 10.1.3.1.0.3984
    Build JDEVADF_10.1.3.0_NT_061009.1404.3984".
    I had an application with JSF and Toplink and am facing issues with toplink cache mechanism while TESTING IN JDEV . Following is the scenario.
    1) When clicking on a link, say 'Get status' , i am querying data from database and displaying in JSF.
    2) Later, i am updating particular record.
    3) when i click on the link again (Get status), updated data is not gettng reflected.
    Here is the code to get data and i am calling this method whenever i am clicking on 'Get status' link.
    public Vector getMaintenanceStatusList(){
    Vector lockersStatus = null;
    try {
    Session sess = ToplinkDBUtils.getTopLinkSession();
    sess.validateCache();
    ReadAllQuery query = new ReadAllQuery();
    query.dontCheckCache();
    query.dontMaintainCache();
    query.setReferenceClass(LockerMaintenanceStatus.class);
    query.useDistinct();
    lockersStatus = sess.readAllObjects(LockerMaintenanceStatus.class);
    } catch (DatabaseException e) {
    e.printStackTrace();
    //******** Printing the updated value.
    for (Iterator i = lockersStatus.iterator();i.hasNext();){
    LockerMaintenanceStatus tmp = (LockerMaintenanceStatus)i.next();
    System.out.println("Status value :: "+tmp.getStatus());
    return lockersStatus;
    Here, i am getting old status value for second time though i have updated the database with new status. (scenario if i work in same browser with same toplink session)
    i am getting updated values only when i restart the JDEV oc4j.
    Please let me know how i can solve the problem.
    Thanks!
    Veeraswami K

    Veeraswami,
    In your code you are constructing a query but are not executing it. Instead you are simply calling session.readAllObjects. The result of this call will be the cached versions (based on default cache config).
    I would recommend doing:
    ReadAllQuery query = new ReadAllQuery(LockerMaintenanceStatus.class);
    query.refreshIdentityMapResult();
    lockersStatus = (Vector) sess.executeQuery(query);The other settings you had used would bypass the cache and not result in its results being refreshed.
    Doug

  • Problem with clearing cache by identity class

    Our application has requirement to have admin methods to clear/refresh objects of certain type from the toplink cache. We tried to use initializeIdentityMap(class) method, but it seems the objects stick around in the cache. But the initializeAllIdentityMaps() method worked. Unfortunately we need the granularity.
    We are currently using toplink 9.0.4 and configured the cache to use FullIdentityMap as the data in cache are quiet static.
    Any help is greatly appreciated.
    Thanks,
    zq

    Doug,
    Thank you very much for your reply. I understand that the initialize features are risky and we tried to use reader-writer lock for each entity type. We are using refresh policy to refresh cache for most of data. But for some types of data which are cached based on the user requests, we don't have queries to refresh all objects of that type in cache. I thought about using a query which will select from cache all the records of given type. But that would be fairly time-consuming if we need to loop through all the records and issue refreshing. What we really want is clear all the records in cache and build the cache again based on user requests.
    What's your recommendation?
    The initializeIdentityMap(class) is prefect for us if it works. Our application is very much like a data provider which get the data from either database or cache and send it over the wire using RMI. The entity we try to clear is very much on its own: no other records/application reference it. But the initialize method seems fail to remove them as we still see them through getAllFromIdentityMap() and subsequent request don't hit the database. What could be wrong?
    When will 10.1.3 ready for production? I looked briefly on the cache related enhancement. A lot of nice new features. But I don't see it help much on the problem we face now: ad hoc clear all the records of an identity type from cache(without references to them). I could be wrong as I only browse through the API doc. Can you shield some light on this?
    Really appreciate your insight.
    zq

  • How do I sync Toplink Cache with my Database?

    Hey guys,
    We are running macro's through an excel sheet that connects to the database and performs Updates and Inserts.
    Since this database update is NOT taking place through TopLink (in a Unit of Work) - we do not see the database changes through the web app on the front end unless we bounce our webserver. Presumably the Toplink cache is re-built on start up...so then we can see the changes.
    My question is, what can I do to make sure the TopLink cache is aware of the database changes we have made through the macro without having to bounce the server? Is there a re-fresh or sync command that can be run?
    This task is sort of a one time thing, so I don't want a solution that involves the cache going to sync itself on a schedule or anything like that. Maybe bouncing is the best solution?
    Thoughts?
    We are using Toplink 9.0.4
    Thanks.

    Hello,
    Because it is a one time thing, if you can make sure no other TopLink process are going on, you can probably get away with initializeAllIdentityMaps() or the intitializeIdentityMap(Class) methods on the session. These will clear the identity maps, having the obvious draw back of removing all object identity which will cause problems with running processes though. It might be better than bouncing the server - it depends on the application. Logging out of the session and logging back in has the same effect of clearing the cache, but with a bit more overhead. Benifit is that running processes will get errors if they continue to use the session, rather than strange behaviior if they continue to use objects after identity is lost.
    Another alternative is to run refresh queries on the data you know might be in the cache or that might have been affected. Drawbacks are that this brings them into the cache if they are not already there.
    TopLink 9.0.4 is a quire a few versions back, and in newer versions there is cache invalidation. An object marked as invalid is not removed, so object identity is maintained, but on the next query the data will be refreshed - ensuring subsequent queries will get results from the database without having to be told explicietly to refresh or being set to always refresh. Invalidation can be triggered on particular objects, classes or the entire cache or different policies can be set to set a time to live etc.
    Except for bouncing the server or logging out of the session, all of the above leave some possibility that a concurrent user will still have a reference to stale data and continue to use it after the process has run on the database. So I hope you use optimistic locking and that your batch process updates the version to avoid other process from overwriting with stale data.
    Best Regards,
    Chris

  • Database Change Notification and TopLink Cache Invalidation

    Has someone succeeed in implementing the How-to Database Change Notification and TopLink Cache Invalidation.
    I have corrected some document errata about the pl/sql content and I manage to have messages in the 'notify_queue'.
    I obtain the Topic in Java from this queue.
    But the TopicSuscriber instances do not receive any message. Is there something to have in mind to make it work ?
    Regards.

    Reviving this thread again...
    I am using DCN feature to build a middle-tier cache. I know oracle has problem sending physical rowid in case of 'Index Organized Table', however, in normal table also its not able to send proper rowid.
    e.g, I have 2 records in Table A with rowid AAARIUAAGAAAV/uABw and AAARIUAAGAAAV/pAAX.
    I have updated both the records. Strangely for the first record, oracle is sending INVALID rowid, although for the second record its sending the valid one.
    Following is the output:
    Row 1:  (Wrong rowid being sent, AAARIUAAGAAAV/uABw is replaced with AAARIUAAGAAAXDCAAr)
    Connection information  : local=localhost.localdomain/127.0.0.1:47633, remote=localhost.localdomain/127.0.0.1:2278
    Registration ID         : 2102
    Notification version    : 1
    Event type              : OBJCHANGE
    Database name           : <sid>
    Table Change Description (length=1)
        operation=[UPDATE], tableName=<table_name>, objectNumber=70164
        Row Change Description (length=1):
          ROW:  operation=UPDATE, ROWID=AAARIUAAGAAAXDCAAr
    Row 2:  (Right rowid being sent, AAARIUAAGAAAV/pAAX)
    Connection information  : local=localhost.localdomain/127.0.0.1:47633, remote=localhost.localdomain/127.0.0.1:2278
    Registration ID         : 2102
    Notification version    : 1
    Event type              : OBJCHANGE
    Database name           : <sid>
    Table Change Description (length=1)
        operation=[UPDATE], tableName=<table_name>, objectNumber=70164
        Row Change Description (length=1):
          ROW:  operation=UPDATE, ROWID=AAARIUAAGAAAV/pAAX
    Any idea ?

  • ValueHolder Indirection and TopLink Cache

    We have a parent object A (main table) and child object B (a lookup table), mapped thought ValueHolder Indirection.
    We use ReadAllQuery to build SQL and retrieve object A(s), and associated B(s).
    The query result is used to populate a web page table.
    The problem is that when the table is populated, the exact same lookup query against object B is repeated without checking cache. That data field is populated by object_A.object_b.description. For example, below same query would be repeated many times when loading up the web page table:
    Select description_id, description from Table_B where description_id = 1
    Why the query generated by this Indirection not checking cache? Anyway to force it to check TopLink cache first before querying against database?
    Thanks for any help!
    Jeffrey

    Thanks for the reply.
    We use JDeveloper 10.1.3.2. TopLink map in JDev is used to map all table objects and their relationships. So In TopLink map, object(table) A has a ValueHolder object(table) B through indirection. The primary key of B is: description_id, which is used in the table reference mapping.
    We use the default TopLink settings in JDev, so object B has below settings in TopLink map:
    Identity Map: FullIdentityMap
    Size: 50 (there are only about 20 records in this lookup table)
    Existence Checking: Check Cache
    We don't have any other caching mechanism other than TopLink's. EJB 3.0 is used as service bean, and External Transaction Controller (OC4J) is used.
    How to check if B is already in the TopLink cache? I heard ReadAllQuery always goes to database w/o checking TopLink cache, but in the case, the query generated by lazy loading indirection is after the ReadAllQuery execution (when the web page table is loading up).
    Jeffrey

  • Child Objects  and TopLink Cache

    All,
    I have a problem RE the TopLink cache:
    Object A has a Vector of Object Bs (1:M) and Object B has a Vector of Object Cs(1:M). I am using ValueHolderInterface and indirection pattern for each of these Vectors.
    When I update an Object C, it is not refreshed the next time I read Object A using the readObject(expression). I can see the changes in the database. Can someone tell me the best way to refresh the cache to get the updated Object Cs that belong to Object A.
    What I am doing is updating the C objects that belong to object A (thru Vector B) and then retrieving them again in the very next method call. Hope this makes sense!
    Thanks!
    J

    There is something wrong with your test case, I've seen this before -- if you update a C, then without fail the cached version of C is updated and if you have a handle to the cached A that has the B that has the C in question, then you will see the update. It sounds like perhaps you're not actually looking at the cached A, but instead looking at it from a UOW, etc.
    Send me an email, it's simply my firstname . lastname at Oracle.com. I'll send you a UOW primer that should help better understand these semantics...
    - Don

  • Cluster config. - toplink cache

    hi all!
    A simple question...
    I've built an application using ADF and toplink.
    Actually the application runs on a single IAS.
    now, for load reasons, i'll need to migrate to a cluster configuration.
    Is there any kind of problem with the toplink cache?
    Thanks.
    Luca

    hi all!
    A simple question...
    I've built an application using ADF and toplink.
    Actually the application runs on a single IAS.
    now, for load reasons, i'll need to migrate to a cluster configuration.
    Is there any kind of problem with the toplink cache?
    Thanks.
    Luca

  • Querying TopLink Cache

    My system demands caching the result sets obtained from a ReadAllQuery. I might make several queries on this static set of cached data. But the data to be cached is small. I use TopLink's use session.getProject().FullIdentityMap() to cache the output of ReadAllQuery that i execute at the start of the system.
    But am not able to query the cache from an external API later ( which could be several minutes later). How can i manipulate the TopLink cache APIs to get this done. Kindly Reply.

    Hi Manoj,
    If I understand you correctly, you persist some objects and then later query them. You don't get the results you expect when you use checkCacheOnly(). You need to use checkCacheThenDatabase() and when you do this you're seeing SQL I expect.
    If your cache type for the class is FullIdentityMap then TopLink will never release objects of that class once read and your checkCacheOnly() query should work.
    I'm guessing that you're using a different TopLink session. You mention you have a number of services. What environment are you running in and what is your architecture (e.g., servlet or EJB)? Statics don't solve sharing problems especially in an application server or web application environment in which multiple classloaders are employed.
    --Shaun                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       

  • TopLink Cache Out of Sync

    I have a situation where the application needs to handle inserts and updates, and deletes are handled by an oracle stored procedure on the database. My problem is after issuing any inserts/updates, then doing a delete of a record, it seems like that record is still in the toplink cache because trying to re-insert that deleted record fails until I restart the app server, then it works fine (until it's deleted again). Is there some way after calling the stored procedure to delete a record, to get the object in toplink updated correctly?
    I've tried a few different things including
    getUnitOfWork().unregisterObject(object);
    and
    getSession().getIdentityMapAccessor().invalidateObject(getObject(object));
    with no luck. Any suggestions?
    Nick

    You can set check existence to be check database instead of check cache.
    http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/ias/toplink/doc/1013/main/_html/uowadv001.htm#CACFHAAJ

  • Toplink Cache issues in Cluster

    Hi
    Our production environment is have a clustered environment and we have been noticing the following problem. When a user is trying to save a record she repeatedly encounters the "Toplink-5006" exception that I have included below.
    TopLink Error]: 2006.07.19 04:49:23.359--UnitOfWork(115148745)--null--Exception [TOPLINK-5006] (TopLink (WLS CMP) - 10g (9.0.4.2) (Build 040311)): oracle.toplink.exceptions.OptimisticLockException
    Exception Description: The object [[email protected]ce459] cannot be updated because it has changed or been deleted since it was last read.
    Class> com.rhii.mjplus.fo.people.beans.People_z2e2a7__TopLink_CMP_2_0 Primary Key> [1001280937, 0]
    [TopLink Error]: 2006.07.19 04:49:23.359--UnitOfWork(115148745)--null--Exception [TOPLINK-5006] (TopLink (WLS CMP) - 10g (9.0.4.2) (Build 040311)): oracle.toplink.exceptions.OptimisticLockException
    Exception Description: The object [[email protected]ce459] cannot be updated because it has changed or been deleted since it was last read.
    Class> com.rhii.mjplus.fo.people.beans.People_z2e2a7__TopLink_CMP_2_0 Primary Key> [1001280937, 0]
    <Jul 19, 2006 4:49:23 PM PDT> <Error> <EJB> <BEA-010026> <Exception occurred during commit of transaction Name=[EJB com.rhii.mjplus.fo.people.beans.PeopleManagerBean.setPeople(java.util.HashMap,java.lang.String,java.lang.String,java.lang.String,java.util.HashSet,com.rhii.mjplus.common.login.data.UserInfoDO)],Xid=BEA1-795A6481D2E1938A8EAD(115171166),Status=Rolled back. [Reason=Exception [TOPLINK-5006] (TopLink (WLS CMP) - 10g (9.0.4.2) (Build 040311)): oracle.toplink.exceptions.OptimisticLockException
    Exception Description: The object [[email protected]ce459] cannot be updated because it has changed or been deleted since it was last read.
    Class> com.rhii.mjplus.fo.people.beans.People_z2e2a7__TopLink_CMP_2_0 Primary Key> [1001280937, 0]],numRepliesOwedMe=0,numRepliesOwedOthers=0,seconds since begin=0,seconds left=60,XAServerResourceInfo[weblogic.jdbc.wrapper.JTSXAResourceImpl]=(ServerResourceInfo[weblogic.jdbc.wrapper.JTSXAResourceImpl]=(state=rolledback,assigned=MS15_mjp),xar=weblogic.jdbc.wrapper.JTSXAResourceImpl@6dcf50b),SCInfo[mjp+MS15_mjp]=(state=rolledback),properties=({weblogic.transaction.name=[EJB com.rhii.mjplus.fo.people.beans.PeopleManagerBean.setPeople(java.util.HashMap,java.lang.String,java.lang.String,java.lang.String,java.util.HashSet,com.rhii.mjplus.common.login.data.UserInfoDO)], weblogic.jdbc=t3://10.253.129.56:2323}),OwnerTransactionManager=ServerTM[ServerCoordinatorDescriptor=(CoordinatorURL=MS15_mjp+10.253.129.56:2323+mjp+t3+, XAResources={},NonXAResources={})],CoordinatorURL=MS15_mjp+10.253.129.56:2323+mjp+t3+): Local Exception Stack:
    Exception [TOPLINK-5006] (TopLink (WLS CMP) - 10g (9.0.4.2) (Build 040311)): oracle.toplink.exceptions.OptimisticLockException
    Exception Description: The object [[email protected]ce459] cannot be updated because it has changed or been deleted since it was last read.
    Class> com.rhii.mjplus.fo.people.beans.People_z2e2a7__TopLink_CMP_2_0 Primary Key> [1001280937, 0]
         at oracle.toplink.exceptions.OptimisticLockException.objectChangedSinceLastReadWhenUpdating(Ljava/lang/Object;Loracle/toplink/queryframework/ObjectLevelModifyQuery;)Loracle/toplink/exceptions/OptimisticLockException;(OptimisticLockException.java:109)
    What is puzzling is that the occurance of this nature has increased with user load and the toplink cache does not seem to have been refreshed after it encounters the first Optimistic Lock exception. We have run several test and this is not reproducabile in the DEV environment where we do not have a clustered set. After making a few updates to a record users starts experiencing the problem ... for some this persist for a really long time.
    We do not have Cache synchronization
    Cluster setup is as followes
    There are 4 boxes and each box has one admin and 4 managed servers.
    I have included the toplink-cmp-people.xml ( Thisis the particular entity bean we have a problem with) Our application server is Weblogic and we have Toplink version 9042
    <toplink-ejb-jar>
    <session>
    <name>People</name>
    <project-class>
    com.rhii.mjplus.fo.people.beans.PeopleToplink
    </project-class>
    <login>
    <datasource>MJPool</datasource>
    <non-jts-datasource>MJPool</non-jts-datasource>
    </login>
    <use-remote-relationships>true</use-remote-relationships>
    <customization-class>com.rhii.mjplus.common.TopLinkCustomization
    </customization-class>
    </session>
    </toplink-ejb-jar>
    I would appreciate any kind of feedback
    Thanks
    Lakshmi

    Can you refresh that record using a query before you save it ?
    Hi
    Our production environment is have a clustered
    environment and we have been noticing the following
    problem. When a user is trying to save a record she
    repeatedly encounters the "Toplink-5006" exception
    that I have included below.
    TopLink Error]: 2006.07.19
    04:49:23.359--UnitOfWork(115148745)--null--Exception
    [TOPLINK-5006] (TopLink (WLS CMP) - 10g (9.0.4.2)
    (Build 040311)):
    oracle.toplink.exceptions.OptimisticLockException
    Exception Description: The object
    [com.rhii.mjplus.fo.people.beans.People_z2e2a7__TopLin
    k_CMP_2_0@6dce459] cannot be updated because it has
    changed or been deleted since it was last read.
    Class>
    com.rhii.mjplus.fo.people.beans.People_z2e2a7__TopLink
    CMP2_0 Primary Key> [1001280937, 0]
    [TopLink Error]: 2006.07.19
    04:49:23.359--UnitOfWork(115148745)--null--Exception
    [TOPLINK-5006] (TopLink (WLS CMP) - 10g (9.0.4.2)
    (Build 040311)):
    oracle.toplink.exceptions.OptimisticLockException
    Exception Description: The object
    [com.rhii.mjplus.fo.people.beans.People_z2e2a7__TopLin
    k_CMP_2_0@6dce459] cannot be updated because it has
    changed or been deleted since it was last read.
    Class>
    com.rhii.mjplus.fo.people.beans.People_z2e2a7__TopLink
    CMP2_0 Primary Key> [1001280937, 0]
    <Jul 19, 2006 4:49:23 PM PDT> <Error> <EJB>
    <BEA-010026> <Exception occurred during commit of
    transaction Name=[EJB
    com.rhii.mjplus.fo.people.beans.PeopleManagerBean.setP
    eople(java.util.HashMap,java.lang.String,java.lang.Str
    ing,java.lang.String,java.util.HashSet,com.rhii.mjplus
    .common.login.data.UserInfoDO)],Xid=BEA1-795A6481D2E19
    38A8EAD(115171166),Status=Rolled back.
    [Reason=Exception [TOPLINK-5006] (TopLink (WLS CMP) -
    10g (9.0.4.2) (Build 040311)):
    oracle.toplink.exceptions.OptimisticLockException
    Exception Description: The object
    [com.rhii.mjplus.fo.people.beans.People_z2e2a7__TopLin
    k_CMP_2_0@6dce459] cannot be updated because it has
    changed or been deleted since it was last read.
    Class>
    com.rhii.mjplus.fo.people.beans.People_z2e2a7__TopLink
    CMP2_0 Primary Key> [1001280937,
    0]],numRepliesOwedMe=0,numRepliesOwedOthers=0,seconds
    since begin=0,seconds
    left=60,XAServerResourceInfo[weblogic.jdbc.wrapper.JTS
    XAResourceImpl]=(ServerResourceInfo[weblogic.jdbc.wrap
    per.JTSXAResourceImpl]=(state=rolledback,assigned=MS15
    _mjp),xar=weblogic.jdbc.wrapper.JTSXAResourceImpl@6dcf
    50b),SCInfo[mjp+MS15_mjp]=(state=rolledback),propertie
    s=({weblogic.transaction.name=[EJB
    com.rhii.mjplus.fo.people.beans.PeopleManagerBean.setP
    eople(java.util.HashMap,java.lang.String,java.lang.Str
    ing,java.lang.String,java.util.HashSet,com.rhii.mjplus
    .common.login.data.UserInfoDO)],
    weblogic.jdbc=t3://10.253.129.56:2323}),OwnerTransacti
    onManager=ServerTM[ServerCoordinatorDescriptor=(Coordi
    natorURL=MS15_mjp+10.253.129.56:2323+mjp+t3+,
    XAResources={},NonXAResources={})],CoordinatorURL=MS15
    _mjp+10.253.129.56:2323+mjp+t3+): Local Exception
    Stack:
    Exception [TOPLINK-5006] (TopLink (WLS CMP) - 10g
    (9.0.4.2) (Build 040311)):
    oracle.toplink.exceptions.OptimisticLockException
    Exception Description: The object
    [com.rhii.mjplus.fo.people.beans.People_z2e2a7__TopLin
    k_CMP_2_0@6dce459] cannot be updated because it has
    changed or been deleted since it was last read.
    Class>
    com.rhii.mjplus.fo.people.beans.People_z2e2a7__TopLink
    CMP2_0 Primary Key> [1001280937, 0]
    at
    t
    oracle.toplink.exceptions.OptimisticLockException.obje
    ctChangedSinceLastReadWhenUpdating(Ljava/lang/Object;L
    oracle/toplink/queryframework/ObjectLevelModifyQuery;)
    Loracle/toplink/exceptions/OptimisticLockException;(Op
    timisticLockException.java:109)
    What is puzzling is that the occurance of this nature
    has increased with user load and the toplink cache
    does not seem to have been refreshed after it
    encounters the first Optimistic Lock exception. We
    have run several test and this is not reproducabile
    in the DEV environment where we do not have a
    clustered set. After making a few updates to a record
    users starts experiencing the problem ... for some
    this persist for a really long time.
    We do not have Cache synchronization
    Cluster setup is as followes
    There are 4 boxes and each box has one admin and 4
    managed servers.
    I have included the toplink-cmp-people.xml ( Thisis
    the particular entity bean we have a problem with)
    Our application server is Weblogic and we have
    Toplink version 9042
    <toplink-ejb-jar>
    <session>
    <name>People</name>
    <project-class>
    com.rhii.mjplus.fo.people.beans.PeopleToplink
    </project-class>
    <login>
    <datasource>MJPool</datasource>
    <non-jts-datasource>MJPool</non-jts-datasource>
    </login>
    <use-remote-relationships>true</use-remote-relationsh
    ips>
    <customization-class>com.rhii.mjplus.common.TopLinkCu
    stomization
    </customization-class>
    </session>
    </toplink-ejb-jar>
    I would appreciate any kind of feedback
    Thanks
    LakshmiCan you refresh that record using a query before you save it ?

  • Toplink Cache sync using JMS

    Hi,
    I am using toplink cache synchronization using Orion JMS. While starting the application I get the following erorr message.
    Oracle apps server version is 10.1.2.0.0 toplink 9.0.4.5
    Local Exception Stack:
    Exception [TOPLINK-15016] (OracleAS TopLink - 10g (9.0.4.5) (Build 040930)): oracle.toplink.exceptions.SynchronizationException
    Exception Description: Could not gain access to SynchronizationService class
    Internal Exception: Exception [TOPLINK-15013] (OracleAS TopLink - 10g (9.0.4.5) (Build 040930)): oracle.toplink.exceptions.SynchronizationException
    Exception Description: Could not find JMS Service Topic named: jms/MyCacheSyncTopic
    Internal Exception: javax.naming.NameNotFoundException: jms/MyTopicFactory not found
    at oracle.toplink.exceptions.SynchronizationException.errorGettingSyncService(SynchronizationException.java:139)
    at oracle.toplink.remote.CacheSynchronizationManager.initialize(CacheSynchronizationManager.java:114)
    at oracle.toplink.publicinterface.DatabaseSession.login(DatabaseSession.java:534)
    at oracle.toplink.tools.sessionmanagement.SessionManager.getSession(SessionManager.java:250)
    at oracle.toplink.tools.sessionmanagement.SessionManager.getSession(SessionManager.java:181)
    at com.starkey.cqm.dao.PersistenceService.initializeService(PersistenceService.java:67)
    at com.starkey.cqm.bcs.CQMServiceManager.createService(CQMServiceManager.java:68)
    at com.starkey.cqm.web.util.CQMInitServlet.init(CQMInitServlet.java:40)
    I have made the modifications in sessions.xml as follows
              <cache-synchronization-manager>
                   <clustering-service>oracle.toplink.remote.jms.JMSClusteringService</clustering-service>
                   <jms-topic-connection-factory-name>jms/MyTopicFactory</jms-topic-connection-factory-name>
                   <jms-topic-name>jms/MyCacheSyncTopic</jms-topic-name>     
              </cache-synchronization-manager>
    Changes in JMS xml
    <topic name="MyCacheSyncTopic" location="jms/MyCacheSyncTopic"/>
    <topic-connection-factory
              host="cqtest1"
              port="3702"
              name="Cache Sync Topic Factory"
              location="jms/MyTopicFactory" />
    Has any one encountered this before ?
    Thanks
    Priya

    Hi Steve,
    Servers 1 and 2 may have dropped the connections to 3. One way that this can happen is if at some point an object delta is sent to a target server that does not have the object deployed, or on its classpath. Make sure that log-debug is turned on for the TopLink session. You should see warnings on servers 1 and 2 about the connections being dropped to 3.
    If none of this seems to help or if you can't find the answers from the debug traces then the logs of the three servers would help support in determining where the problem occurred.
    -Mike

  • Toplink cache growing until OutOfMemoryError

    Hello,
    We are using OC4J 9.0.3 with toplink 9.0.3 on IBM AIX J2RE 1.3.1. From time to time, the JVM crashes with an OutOfMemoryError. Analysing the JVM heap dump, we have found that there are a lot of objects of the same type in the toplink cache:
    # of objects: 48 047
    Total size in bytes: 165 874 992
    The identity map settings for the project caching this object type are:
    Type: SoftCacheWeakIdentityMap
    Size: 100
    My understanding is that most of the 48 047 objects should be referenced as a weak references and that some of them should have been garbage collected by the VM instead of throwing an OutOfMemoryError.
    Could it be a problem in the JVM garbage collector ?
    May I use a CacheIdentityMap to work around the problem ?
    Do you have any advice ?
    Thank you in advance for any hint,
    Pierre Laroche

    Being in production I am not sure how much you can debug the system, but to determine if it is an issue with the weak references you could clear out the cache through an initializeAllIdentityMaps call on the session when the system is using most of the memory? This will remove all objects from the TopLink identity map removing the WeakReferences. This call should not be completed on a system still servicing requests though. Is it possible that there is a leak in the application that is preventing the WeakReferences from being garbage collected?
    --Gordon                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       

Maybe you are looking for

  • Purchase order - output type vendor different from PO vendor

    Hello, we have created a new output type that sends our purchase order as emails. The email will be sent to the vendor email address that is entered together with the output type under messages of a purchase order. We need the emails to be sent an in

  • Get a report joining data from Get-MailBox and Get-MailBoxStatistics

    Hi I have 2 cmdlets, and every has different information of the same users, the point is that I have to get the information of every cmdlet  and in excel I have to join the information Is there a way to get both information joined in one shot? This i

  • How to use downloaded fonts in Pages?

    I downloaded a set of 6 new fonts on my Mac in a ZIP archive. I read that there are at least 4 Font folders in Mac OS X. Which folder(s) do these fonts have to be placed in so I can use them with Pages?

  • How to clear cache from a 11503

    I have a few web servers and a 11503 that is setup to load balance between the web servers. I have turned off my servers for testing and I still see the web content. It doesnt look like my browser, for I can refresh it and the web content still comes

  • Why are my views pages zooming to 300%? What can I do about it?

    I'm putting up new images that open upon clicking my thumbnails. They are zooming to about 300%, even after I change the sizes. they don't do this on any other browser. What can be done about this? It's making my large views look blurry and out of fo