Problem while creating PO from SO for a Variant configurable material

Hi
i am facing a problem when i am creating a Purchse order from a Sales order.
the material is a variant configurable material and we are creating a Sales order in Future date say in june.
For one of the materials in the SO the configuration is different today and the configuration is different in June.
Today the BOM contains different materials and in june there is a different bom for the material.
and according to my understanding the BOM gets exploded on the basis on the delivery date in SO.
here on the basis of the config which is valid in june materials are getting picked and that is correct.
when i try to creat a PO out of that SO i could see that the BOM gets exploded and correct materials are picked but i get the error message that inforecord for one of the componentes is not there.
but that component is not getting selected in the config..and it is not there in BOM in june.
It is there in the BOM today but not in JUNE.
I dont understand why the system is refering to that componeent and throwing this error
please help
Thanks & Regards
sarika

You may try creating two BOMs -- one speicfic to the date of order.
Sanjeev

Similar Messages

Hi all, i'm new and facing a problem while creating a new file for Xcode. I can't select the box "with XIB for user interface" if the subclass is "UIViewController".this problem happen after i upgrade Xcode to 4.6 version.Appreciate for any help rendered.

Hi all, i'm new to Mac book & Xcode. I'm learning and facing problems while creating a new file for Xcode. Before i upgrade the software, i have no issue to create simple steps in apps. After upgrade Xcode to 4.6 version, i'm facing lot's of issue eg.
1) "the identity "iphone developer" doesn't match any valid certificate/ private key pair",
2) can't select the box "with XIB for user interface" if the subclass is "UIViewController"..
Appreciate for any help rendered.

Mikko777 wrote:So what is the best?
I wouldn't judge. I've been to Arch for a week, you know? But as said, it's VERY close to it.
What I dislike after a week is makepkg not handling dependencies automatically (which would be overhead, so probably not appropriate).
Mikko777 wrote:Also theres KDEmod for modular kde, dunno if its for 64 bits tho.
Don't actually need that as said ... I see no real benefit of having that other than not beeing a KDE user or having Gentoos useflags.
Mikko777 wrote:PS:You produce a lot of text and welcome smile
Yeah. Wonder why I'm still employed? So do I ...

Problem while Creating IBase from WEB UI

Hi,
I am trying to create a New Ibase from WEB UI. But, alwayz the IBase category is defaulting to "Functional Location" and this field is not in Editable mode also.
So, I am not able to create the Ibase with any other categories.
Please do suggest to solve this issue.
Thanks,
Sandeep

HI,
Check the settings in SPRO path:Customer Relationship Management ->Master Data ->Installed Base ->Installed Base Category ->Define Installed Base Category and Installation Rules .
Here for the Ibase category which you want to maintain chech the Maint rule.It should be set to "Maintenance Allowed Using Installed base Management"
I think currently only for Ibase category FL this setting is maintained thats the reason its taking as default.
Regards,
PP

Problem while creating TP from Deals

Hi All,
when I create a Trade promotion from deal,all the data from deal is transferred to TP .But when I check Customer investments tab (Discount tab)I see the trade spend which I entered in deals are not transferred to Trade promotion correctly,the spend values are becoming zero by default in TP of Deal.
I will be thankful if anybody can tell what are the possible reasons for this error.
Thanks in advance
regards,
Ramani

Hi All,
when I create a Trade promotion from deal,all the data from deal is transferred to TP .But when I check Customer investments tab (Discount tab)I see the trade spend which I entered in deals are not transferred to Trade promotion correctly,the spend values are becoming zero by default in TP of Deal.
I will be thankful if anybody can tell what are the possible reasons for this error.
Thanks in advance
regards,
Ramani

Problem while creating the Partner Address in CRM

Hi,
   We are facing one problem while creating the new address for the Business Partner.
   When ever customer wants to change the address : we are following one process : where we are
   using 'BAPI_BUPA_ADDRESS_ADD' functin module. Becuse of this , new addrss number will be generated for the
corresponding account in BUT021_FS table.But this table contains old address number as a first record, so that when ever
we display the partner address in UI, it is displaying the old address only because first entry of the the table 'BUT021_FS'
contains the old address number.
Because of this , we are getting lots of complaints regarding this.
Can you please help on this ASAP.
Thanks & Regards
Pradeep.

Try BAPI_BUPA_ADDRESS_CHANGE for address change followed by BAPI_TRANSACTION_COMMIT . It works.

Problem while creating PO for Calibration order PR

Hi,
I am facing following problem while create PO for calibration order PR:
"Comparison of the field selection strings from the G/L account 8000010800 and the account assignment category F reveals that there is an incompatible combination of field selections for the field selection group 'Network'.
The G/L account field selection is stored in table T004F; that for the account assignment is stored in table T162K."
Can anybody help me urgently.
Regards,
Mew

Hi,
Check the field selection for account assignment category & Field status group of G/L 8000010800.
Compare both & set the field selection equally in both.
Regards,
Piyush

PS: WBS is not flowing for a Material, while creating delivery from Project

Hi,
While creating delivery from Project thro CNS0, WBS is not flowing for a Material in delivery, in turn WBS is not flowing in Billing document for same material, in turn not allowing to Post the Billing document to Accounting.
Error while releasing Billing to the Accounting: Accounting Entry is not generated. Error Message:Assign Condition type
YMRG in COPA.
Pls let me know, what can be the reason ?
Thanks.
Amit.

Hi Kuldeep,
Check this note,
Note 159387 - Message BP603: incorrect line item is displayed
Its valid only till 4.6. Might give you some idea but.
Regards,
Gokul

Problem while selecting BELNR from BSEG

Hi Experts,
I have a report performance problem while fetching BELNR from BSEG table.
I have to print latest BELNR from BSEG where BUZID = M but at the time of execution of report, It is taking too much time (More that hour and sometimes it gets hanged).
I have also gone through the comments provided by experts for previous problems asked in this forum e.g. BSEG is a cluster table that is why data retrieval takes long time etc.
Can any one has any other idea or suggestion or any other way to solve this problem
Regards,
Neeraj

Hi,
1) Try to create an index on BUZID field
2) Don't use SELECT/ENDSELECT statement. Instead of that extract all the concerned entries from BSEG into an internal table :
select belnr from bseg appending table itab where buzid = 'M'.
then do this :
sort itab by belnr.
describe itab lines n.
read table itab index n.
Please reward if helpful.
Regards,
Nicolas.

Error has come while creating USER from SU01

Dear Expert,
I have got typical error while creating user from T-Code SU01.
Problem is like that : I suppose to use SU01 and "User Maintanace: Initial Screen
has come. Now I put the new user name like ABAP2008 or FI2008 (what ever the name thats hardly matter) and click on CREAT button then next screen Maintain User has been appeared.In this screen Address TAB is on and asking for fillup all the required user information.So I have been made all information like :First name /Last name /Tele ph/Fax / email etc etc. After complete this tab when I clicked on next tab is called "LOGON DATA, it has been given a error "Specify a valid country indicator
Message no. T5027" . Even thogh I didn't able to go to next screen LOGON DATA.Because of these problem I doesn't able to creat a user.
SAP : IDES version ECC 6
DB:SQL2005
OS: Windows 2003 server
Please do the needfull
Thanks & Regards
Pavel

Hey Pavel,
Are you using ECC with ISU.. ? I am not sure but I feel your issue can be solved with information provided in SAPnote,
Note 1046566 - EC70: address-independent telephone number no country.
The system does not transfer any country from the master data template with the address-independent telephone number. The system issues the warning message T5027 "Specify a valid country indicator".
All the best !

Password Violation error while creating users from Admin interface

Guys,
The Sun Identity Manager system throws policy violation error while creating users from Sun Identity Manager Admin interface.
Current System:
1. I have configured TAM Pass-Thru authentication for End User Login Application.
2. I have an admin user 'testsjimadmin1' who has admin capabilities. testsjimadmin1 user has default SJIM password policy.
3. I have custom password policies configured for different orgainizatoions
Problem:
1. The Sun Identity Manager throws a password policy violation error when 'testsjimadmin1' tries to create an user with valid or invalid password from Sun Identity Manager Admin interface.
2. If TAM Pass-thru authentication is removed for 'End User Login Application' and Sun Identity Manager default authentication is configured for 'End User Login Application' then testsjimadmin1 was able to create user successfully without any errors.
Please let me know if any configurations are required to be made on Sun Identity Manager for TAM Pass-Thru authentication so that admin users can create users successfully from admin interface.
Appreciate your help!!!
Thanks
Vijay

Guys,
The Sun Identity Manager system throws policy violation error while creating users from Sun Identity Manager Admin interface.
Current System:
1. I have configured TAM Pass-Thru authentication for End User Login Application.
2. I have an admin user 'testsjimadmin1' who has admin capabilities. testsjimadmin1 user has default SJIM password policy.
3. I have custom password policies configured for different orgainizatoions
Problem:
1. The Sun Identity Manager throws a password policy violation error when 'testsjimadmin1' tries to create an user with valid or invalid password from Sun Identity Manager Admin interface.
2. If TAM Pass-thru authentication is removed for 'End User Login Application' and Sun Identity Manager default authentication is configured for 'End User Login Application' then testsjimadmin1 was able to create user successfully without any errors.
Please let me know if any configurations are required to be made on Sun Identity Manager for TAM Pass-Thru authentication so that admin users can create users successfully from admin interface.
Appreciate your help!!!
Thanks
Vijay

Error while creating inter-company invoice for stock transport

Hi ,
I am facing following errors while creating inter-company invoice for STO order.
We have scenario where standard PO is created in company code A & then replenishment delivery is created in company code B.While raising inter-company invoice to company code A, we are facing problem.
In replenishment delivery we have 10 line items. But when we try to do inter company invoice through VF01/VF04 we get following log
XXXXXXXXXX(delivery Number) 000000 Customer XXXXX: Customer master table KNVV is missing (VF-022)
XXXXXXXXXX (delivery Number)000010 The bill-to party could not be determined (VF-047)
XXXXXXXXXX (delivery Number)000010 The payer could not be determined (VF-048)
With this first line item from delivery is not flows to invoice & if we saves this invoice then it is get saved with account determination error as some of the data does not comes into invoice header like account assignment group for customer, Payment term, destination country,region, tax classification for customer etc. That means invoice gets created without first line item from delivery with account determination error & so,no accounting document gets generated.
I checked customer master for all SP,SH,BP,PY they are correctly maintained.This was working fine few months back, but not working now.
If anybody had come across such kind of scenario, your valuable inputs will be highly appreciated.
Thanks & kind regards,
Ganesh Palatshaha

Hello
Kindly check the sales area of customer involved, whether the customer maintain with sales area for STO.
If that is note the case the refer following link:
- Error VF 047 & 048 while creating Inter company billing
Regards
JP

Problem while Creating MVLOG with synonym in Oracle 9i:Is it an Oracle Bug?

Hi All,
I am facing a problem while Creating MVLOG with synonym in Oracle 9i but for 10G it is working fine. Is it an Oracle Bug? or i am missing something.
SQL> select * from v$version;
BANNER
Oracle Database 10g Express Edition Release 10.2.0.1.0 - Product
PL/SQL Release 10.2.0.1.0 - Production
CORE    10.2.0.1.0      Production
TNS for 32-bit Windows: Version 10.2.0.1.0 - Production
NLSRTL Version 10.2.0.1.0 - Production
SQL>
SQL> create table t ( name varchar2(20), id varchar2(1) primary key);
Table created.
SQL> create materialized view log on t;
Materialized view log created.
SQL> create public synonym syn_t for t;
Synonym created.
SQL> CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW MV_t
2 REFRESH ON DEMAND
3 WITH PRIMARY KEY
4 AS
5 SELECT name,id
6 FROM syn_t;
Materialized view created.
SQL> CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW LOG ON MV_t
2 WITH PRIMARY KEY
3   (name)
4    INCLUDING NEW VALUES;
Materialized view log created.
SQL> select * from v$version;
BANNER
Oracle9i Enterprise Edition Release 9.2.0.6.0 - Production
PL/SQL Release 9.2.0.6.0 - Production
CORE    9.2.0.6.0       Production
TNS for Solaris: Version 9.2.0.6.0 - Production
NLSRTL Version 9.2.0.6.0 - Production
SQL>
SQL> create table t ( name varchar2(20), id varchar2(1) primary key);
Table created.
SQL> create materialized view log on t;
Materialized view log created.
SQL> create public synonym syn_t for t;
Synonym created.
SQL> CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW MV_t
REFRESH ON DEMAND
WITH PRIMARY KEY
AS
2    3    4    5 SELECT name,id
FROM syn_t;   6
Materialized view created.
SQL> CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW LOG ON MV_t
WITH PRIMARY KEY
(name)
INCLUDING NEW VALUES; 2    3    4
CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW LOG ON MV_t
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-12014: table 'MV_T' does not contain a primary key constraintRegards
Message was edited by:
Avinash Tripathi
null

Hi Nicloei,
Thanks for the reply. Actually i don't want any work around (Creating MVLOG on table rather than synonym is fine with me) . I just wanted to know it is actually an oracle bug or something else.
Regards
Avinash

Problem while creating URL iview (in EP7.0)

Hi,
I encountered a problem while creating URL iview (in EP7.0) as when I selected the iview template for creating the URL iview, the content area got displayed as
"No templates to display. You are not assigned to any existing templates."
please assist me in this regard.
Thanks,
Suri

Hi Manoj,
Thank you for your reply.
I am still getting the same messages even after creating the iview template in EP7.0
Created through:
content Admin --> portal content --> <folder>new --> iview --> seleting "Portal component - create an iView from a portal component contained in a deployed portal archive (PAR file)" <next> --> seleting "com.sap.portal.appintegrator.sap" <next> --> webdynpro <next> --> finish.
Open object for editing...--> Object is a Template to Yes.
Result :
content Admin --> portal content --> <folder>new --> iview --> seleting "iview template- create an iView from an existing iView template" <next> which displays the same message.
"No templates to display. You are not assigned to any existing templates."
Rgrds,
Suri.

Problem while creating xml with cdata section

Hi,
I am facing problem while creating xml with cdata section in it. I am using Oracle 10.1.0.4.0 I am writing a stored procedure which accepts a set of input parameters and creates a xml document from them. The code snippet is as follows:
select xmlelement("DOCUMENTS",
xmlagg
(xmlelement
("DOCUMENT",
xmlforest
(m.document_name_txt as "DOCUMENT_NAME_TXT",
m.document_type_cd as "DOCUMENT_TYPE_CD",
'<![cdata[' || m.document_clob_data || ']]>' as "DOCUMENT_CLOB_DATA"
) from table(cast(msg_clob_data_arr as DOCUMENT_CLOB_TBL))m;
msg_clob_data_arr is an input parameter to procedure and DOCUMENT_CLOB_TBL is a pl/sql table of an object containing 3 attributes: first 2 being varchar2 and the 3rd one as CLOB. The xml document this query is generating is as follows:
<DOCUMENTS>
<DOCUMENT>
<DOCUMENT_NAME_TXT>TestName</DOCUMENT_NAME_TXT>
<DOCUMENT_TYPE_CD>BLOB</DOCUMENT_TYPE_CD>
<DOCUMENT_CLOB_DATA>
<![cdata[123456789012345678901234567890123456789012]]>
</DOCUMENT_CLOB_DATA>
</DOCUMENT>
</DOCUMENTS>
The problem is instead of <![cdata[....]]> xmlforest query is encoding everything to give < for cdata tag. How can I overcome this? Please help.

SQL> create or replace function XMLCDATA_10103 (elementName varchar2,
2                                             cdataValue varchar2)
3 return xmltype deterministic
4 as
5 begin
6     return xmltype('<' || elementName || '><![CDATA[' || cdataValue || ']]>
7 end;
8 /
Function created.
SQL> select xmlelement
2         (
3            "Row",
4            xmlcdata_10103('Junk','&<>!%$#&%*&$'),
5            xmlcdata_10103('Name',ENAME),
6            xmlelement("EMPID", EMPNO)
7         ).extract('/*')
8* from emp
SQL> /
<Row>
<Junk><![CDATA[&<>!%$#&%*&$]]></Junk>
<Name><![CDATA[SMITH]]></Name>
<EMPID>7369</EMPID>
</Row>
<Row>
<Junk><![CDATA[&<>!%$#&%*&$]]></Junk>
<Name><![CDATA[ALLEN]]></Name>
<EMPID>7499</EMPID>
</Row>
<Row>
<Junk><![CDATA[&<>!%$#&%*&$]]></Junk>
<Name><![CDATA[WARD]]></Name>
<EMPID>7521</EMPID>
</Row>
<Row>
<Junk><![CDATA[&<>!%$#&%*&$]]></Junk>
<Name><![CDATA[JONES]]></Name>
<EMPID>7566</EMPID>
</Row>
<Row>
<Junk><![CDATA[&<>!%$#&%*&$]]></Junk>
<Name><![CDATA[MARTIN]]></Name>
<EMPID>7654</EMPID>
</Row>
<Row>
<Junk><![CDATA[&<>!%$#&%*&$]]></Junk>
<Name><![CDATA[BLAKE]]></Name>
<EMPID>7698</EMPID>
</Row>
<Row>
<Junk><![CDATA[&<>!%$#&%*&$]]></Junk>
<Name><![CDATA[CLARK]]></Name>
<EMPID>7782</EMPID>
</Row>
<Row>
<Junk><![CDATA[&<>!%$#&%*&$]]></Junk>
<Name><![CDATA[SCOTT]]></Name>
<EMPID>7788</EMPID>
</Row>
<Row>
<Junk><![CDATA[&<>!%$#&%*&$]]></Junk>
<Name><![CDATA[KING]]></Name>
<EMPID>7839</EMPID>
</Row>
<Row>
<Junk><![CDATA[&<>!%$#&%*&$]]></Junk>
<Name><![CDATA[TURNER]]></Name>
<EMPID>7844</EMPID>
</Row>
<Row>
<Junk><![CDATA[&<>!%$#&%*&$]]></Junk>
<Name><![CDATA[ADAMS]]></Name>
<EMPID>7876</EMPID>
</Row>
<Row>
<Junk><![CDATA[&<>!%$#&%*&$]]></Junk>
<Name><![CDATA[JAMES]]></Name>
<EMPID>7900</EMPID>
</Row>
<Row>
<Junk><![CDATA[&<>!%$#&%*&$]]></Junk>
<Name><![CDATA[FORD]]></Name>
<EMPID>7902</EMPID>
</Row>
<Row>
<Junk><![CDATA[&<>!%$#&%*&$]]></Junk>
<Name><![CDATA[MILLER]]></Name>
<EMPID>7934</EMPID>
</Row>
14 rows selected.
SQL>

Problem while Creating Service order through Work Order

Hi Gurus,
I have a problem While creating Service order (me21n) through - Work order it contains service requisitions.
So that means they carry information such as G/L and work order number while entering the requistion no in PO Creation Screen (me21n) which automatically should be picked from the work order refference.
But problem here is the service items and all other are assigned to PO except the Account Assingnment tab which is GL Account and Work Order No and Cost center..
Can anyone explain me this?
Is this something that one can explain?
Regards,
Murugesh R
Rewards for value replies.

Closed..

Problem while creating PO from SO for a Variant configurable material

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for