Problem with 5800, call processing is too slow.

i have a problem with rejecting calls and recieving as well as dialling. it takes to much time to process. when a caller calls me they hear the dial tone for about 5 seconds then i get the call on my phone.. when i use third party software for automatic rejecting calls, the caller hears the dialtone for like 10 seconds or more then it gets rejected which is really annoying. please help me. is there a solution for this? this is not the network problem coz my sim n rejecting calls on other phones work fine. AND ALSO wen someone calls me i get the call alert like after 10 seconds, its very slow!!

Make sure you have upgraded to 1.1.1 which fixes volume problems.
Note that it will NEVER be as loud as standard cell phones but it should improve the volume so you have no problem hearing it in the car.

Similar Messages

After ios7 update my iphone is like android os dead slow processing , too fast battery drain,calling process is too low where is apple brand going my friends 11 members using iphone all are got this problem one thing fans like me y they spoil his name ??

after ios7 update my iphone 4 is like android os dead slow processing , too fast battery drain,calling process is too low where is apple brand going my friends 11 members using iphone all are got this problem one thing apple have unique and unique fans like me why they spoil their name like this update iam too disappointed iam not say for oppose apple iam say for feedback to grow apple in world because i love apple more please solve it
by real customers
iPhone 4, iOS 7, iam apple suporter

please help me after ios7 update my phone is tooo slowww i want my old iphone

Hello i have a problem with my macbook pro become to slow to write any thing, to do any thing and the fan is always on never stop what can i do?

hello i have a problem with my macbook pro become to slow to write any thing, to do any thing and the fan is always on never stop what can i do?
i already reinstall the software many times and still the same i dont know what is happening is there is somebody who can help me please im will waiting

There are any number of possibilies... you could have problems with runaway applications, causing your machine to overheat and setting the fans off, you could have bad fan sensors, etc.
Open Activity Monitor (Applications>Utilities) and see if you have any apps that may be hogging the CPU. Call back.
Clinton

Software Problem with 5800

Hi,
I am using 5800 with the software version V 30.0.011. My set gets hanged when during an incoming call or an incoming message. the ringtone stays stuck so is the vibration... I cant stop it by any ways .. The only way is removing my battery.Cant even switch it off.
Is this a usual problem with 5800??

No it is not. Is the phone new? Also your software may be updated. The latest version if v40.
Also please check if the problem still occurs if the memory card is not inserted.
If you find my post helpful please click the green star on the left under the avatar. Thanks.

While installing adobe creative cloud , getting the following error msg " There seems to be a problem with the download process. Error code:201"

while installing adobe creative cloud , getting the following error msg " There seems to be a problem with the download process. Error code:201"

Creative Cloud Help / Error downloading Creative Cloud applications
http://helpx.adobe.com/creative-cloud/kb/error-downloading-cc-apps.html

Problems with a call transaction

Hi, I'm having some problems with a call transaction and I cannot understand why. I put A in the mode, and I am seeing the dynpros and I am pressing enter it works perfectly but when I use mode N it tells me that there is not information for one of the dynpros and it doesn't work. Does anybody know the problem and how to solve it??
Thanks in advance

Hi,
First of all thank you very much for your time.
I am using FB05 and the problem is in dynpro SAPLKACB 0002, and it says that batch input data doesn't exist. Here is the code, maybe you can see what is happening
LOOP AT t_resumen WHERE belnr = t_batch-belnr AND
                            ( contador = 3 OR contador = 4 or CONTADOR = 5 ).
      READ TABLE t_clave WITH KEY belnr = t_resumen-belnr.
      d_clave = t_clave-bschl.
      i = i + 1.
      CASE i.
        WHEN 1.
          PERFORM bdc_dynpro USING 'SAPMF05A'    '0700'.
          PERFORM bdc_field   USING 'BDC_OKCODE' '/00'.
          PERFORM bdc_field   USING 'RF05A-NEWBS' t_resumen-bschl.
          PERFORM bdc_field   USING 'RF05A-NEWKO' t_resumen-hkont.
          PERFORM bdc_field   USING 'BDC_OKCODE' '/00'.
          PERFORM bdc_dynpro USING 'SAPMF05A'    '0300'.
          PERFORM bdc_field   USING 'BDC_OKCODE' '/00'.
          j_wrbtr = t_resumen-wrbtr.
          REPLACE '.' WITH ',' INTO j_wrbtr.
          PERFORM bdc_field   USING 'BSEG-WRBTR' j_wrbtr.
          PERFORM bdc_dynpro USING 'SAPLKACB'    '0002'.
          PERFORM bdc_field   USING 'BDC_OKCODE' '/00'.
        WHEN t.
          PERFORM bdc_dynpro USING 'SAPMF05A'    '0300'.
          PERFORM bdc_field   USING 'RF05A-NEWBS' t_resumen-bschl.
          PERFORM bdc_field   USING 'RF05A-NEWKO' t_resumen-hkont.
          PERFORM bdc_field   USING 'BDC_OKCODE' '/00'.
          j_hkont = t_resumen-hkont.
          j_clave = t_resumen-bschl.
          PERFORM bdc_dynpro USING 'SAPMF05A'    '0300'.
          PERFORM bdc_field   USING 'BDC_OKCODE' '=BU'.
          j_wrbtr = t_resumen-wrbtr.
          REPLACE '.' WITH ',' INTO j_wrbtr.
          PERFORM bdc_field   USING 'BSEG-WRBTR' j_wrbtr.
          PERFORM bdc_dynpro USING 'SAPLKACB'    '0002'.
          PERFORM bdc_field   USING 'BDC_OKCODE' '/00'.
        WHEN OTHERS.
          PERFORM bdc_dynpro USING 'SAPMF05A'    '0300'.
          PERFORM bdc_field   USING 'RF05A-NEWBS' t_resumen-bschl.
          PERFORM bdc_field   USING 'RF05A-NEWKO' t_resumen-hkont.
          PERFORM bdc_field   USING 'BDC_OKCODE' '/00'.
          j_hkont = t_resumen-hkont.
          j_clave = t_resumen-bschl.
          PERFORM bdc_dynpro USING 'SAPMF05A'    '0300'.
          PERFORM bdc_field   USING 'BDC_OKCODE' '/00'.
          j_wrbtr = t_resumen-wrbtr.
          REPLACE '.' WITH ',' INTO j_wrbtr.
          PERFORM bdc_field   USING 'BSEG-WRBTR' j_wrbtr.
          PERFORM bdc_dynpro USING 'SAPLKACB'    '0002'.
          PERFORM bdc_field   USING 'BDC_OKCODE' '/00'.
      ENDCASE.
        READ TABLE t_porcentajes WITH KEY gjahr = t_resumen-zzbad
                                       zzbtd = t_resumen-zzbtd.
        IF j_hkont = t_porcentajes-cfacpr.
          PERFORM bdc_field   USING 'COBL-PRCTR' t_porcentajes-prctrfac.
          PERFORM bdc_field   USING 'COBL-ZZBTD' t_resumen-zzbtd.
          PERFORM bdc_field   USING 'COBL-ZZBAD' t_resumen-zzbad.
        ELSEIF t_resumen-hkont = t_porcentajes-cadmin.
         PERFORM bdc_field   USING 'COBL-KOSTL' '20801'.
        ELSEIF t_resumen-hkont = t_porcentajes-creca.
         PERFORM bdc_field   USING 'COBL-KOSTL' '20401'.
        ELSE.
          IF d_clave = 01 OR d_clave = 04 OR d_clave = 40 OR d_clave = 09.
            IF j_hkont >= 424001 AND j_hkont <= 424005.
              PERFORM bdc_field   USING 'COBL-PRCTR' 'DUMMY'.
            ELSEIF j_hkont >= 424601 AND j_hkont <= 424605.
              IF j_clave = 40.
                PERFORM bdc_field   USING 'COBL-PRCTR' 'DUMMY'.
              ENDIF.
            ENDIF.
          ELSEIF d_clave = 11 OR d_clave = 12 OR d_clave = 14 OR d_clave = 50.
            IF j_hkont >= 424001 AND j_hkont <= 424005.
              PERFORM bdc_field   USING 'COBL-PRCTR' 'DUMMY'.
            ELSEIF j_hkont >= 424601 AND j_hkont <= 424605.
              IF j_clave = 50.
                PERFORM bdc_field   USING 'COBL-PRCTR' 'DUMMY'.
              ENDIF.
            ENDIF.
          ENDIF.
*Fin modificacion marzo 2007.----
          PERFORM bdc_field   USING 'COBL-ZZBTD' t_resumen-zzbtd.
          PERFORM bdc_field   USING 'COBL-ZZBAD' t_resumen-zzbad.
          PERFORM bdc_field   USING 'COBL-ZZBTT' t_resumen-zzbtt.
          PERFORM bdc_field   USING 'COBL-ZZBTU' t_resumen-zzbtu.
          PERFORM bdc_field   USING 'COBL-ZZBTS' t_resumen-zzbts.
          PERFORM bdc_field   USING 'COBL-ZZBAG' t_resumen-zzbag.
          PERFORM bdc_field   USING 'COBL-ZZBRE' t_resumen-zzbre.
          PERFORM bdc_field   USING 'COBL-ZZBC8' t_resumen-zzbc8.
          PERFORM bdc_field   USING 'COBL-ZZBC9' t_resumen-zzbc9.
        ENDIF.
    ENDLOOP.

I have a problem with my mac i have too many archives and programs and i want to delete all files and start at the begin my mac with out do format

i have a problem with my mac i have too many archives and programs and i want to delete all files and start at the begin my mac with out do format

I do not recommend reformatting your harddrive and reloading your software. This is a Windows thing. On an older mac it may be difficult to find all your software again.
Best to have greater than 2gig of free space. Many posters to these forums state that you need much more free space: 5 gig to 10 gig or 10 percent of you hd size.
(0)
Be careful when deleting files. A lot of people have trashed their system when deleting things. Place things in trash. Reboot & run your applications. Empty trash.
Go after large files that you have created & know what they are. Do not delete small files that are in a folder you do not know what the folder is for. Anything that is less than a megabyte is a small file these days.
(1)
Run
OmniDiskSweeper
"The simple, fast way to save disk space"
OmniDiskSweeper is now free!
http://www.omnigroup.com/applications/omnidisksweeper/download/
This will give you a list of files and folders sorted by size. Go after things you know that are big.
(2)
These pages have some hints on freeing up space:
http://thexlab.com/faqs/freeingspace.html
http://www.macmaps.com/diskfull.html
(3)
Buy an external firewire harddrive.
For a PPC computer, I recommend a firewire drive.
Has everything interface:
FireWire 800/400 + USB2, + eSATA 'Quad Interface'
save a little money interface:
FireWire 400 + USB 2.0
This web page lists both external harddrive types. You may need to scroll to the right to see both.
http://eshop.macsales.com/shop/firewire/1394/USB/EliteAL/eSATA_FW800_FW400_USB
(4)
Buy a flash card.

I want to upgrade from Tiger to Snow Leopard on my 2008 MacPro. How do I avoid problems with the upgrade process?

I want to upgrade from Tiger to Snow Leopard on my 2008 MacPro. How do I avoid problems with the upgrade process?

#1 Do a complete bootable backup of your drive before upgrading. That way should anything happen you can revert back to the start and try again.
Make sure you meet Snow Leopard 10.6 Technical Requirements - http://support.apple.com/kb/SP575
You might also want to make sure you don't have software issues with SL:
A Mac OS X 10.6 Snow Leopard Application Compatibility List - http://snowleopard.wikidot.com/

I have problems with outgoing call no audio, only works with speaker. I bought my iphone on december 2011.

I have problems with outgoing call no audio, only works with speaker. I bought my iphone on december 2011.

Had the same problem, no audio on incoming or outgoing calls and only could hear the conversation of the call if I put on speaker. It seemed to start after I did a recent IOS update this past month. I tried restart, reset and restore of my iPhone but nothing changed. It appears not to be a software issue but a hardware problem. I got my phone this past summer so it was still under warranty and got it replaced.

I was playing candy crush and I had too much problem with my bill your charge too much I want to know what is the problem with this game cost

HELLO
I was playing candy crush and I had too much problem with my bill your charge too much I want to know what is the problem with this game cost

Take it up with iTunes Support - we are not Apple here, we are just users like you:
http://www.apple.com/support/itunes/ww/
Cheers,
GB

Setting always changes by itself in my iPhone 5s, also every few calls I have to face a problem with a call without sound

Setting always changes by itself in my iPhone 5s, also every few calls I have to face a problem with a call without sound, battery becomes empty quickly

User troubleshooting steps as outlined in the manual are reset, restore, restore as new. Have you tried any of these?

IR Report found 1 million record with blob files performance is too slow!

we are using
oracle apex 4.2.x
Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.3.0 - Production
mod_plsql with Apache
Hardware: HP proliant ML350P
OS: WINDOWS 2008 R2
customized content management system developed in apex.when open the IR report have 1 ml rows found and each rows have blob(<5MB as pdf/tiff/bmp/jpg) it will be raising rows in future! but the searching performance is very slow!
how can increasing the performance?
how can showing progressing status to user while searching progress going on IR report itself?
Thanx,
Ram

It's impossible to make definitive recommendations on performance improvement based on the limited information provided (in particular the absence of APEX debug traces and SQL execution plans), and lacking knowledge of the application requirements and access to real data.
As noted above, this is mainly a matter of data model and application design rather than a problem with APEX.
Based on what has been made available on apex.oracle.com, taking action on the following points may improve performance.
I have concerns about the data model. The multiple DMS_TOPMGT_MASTER.NWM_DOC_LVL_0x_COD_NUM columns are indications of incomplete normalization, and the use of the DMS_TOPMGT_DETAILS table hints at an EAV model. Look at normalizing the model so that the WM_DOC_LVL_0x_COD_NUM relationship data can be retrieved using a single join rather than multiple scalar subqueries. Store 1:1 document attributes as column values in DMS_TOPMGT_MASTER rather than rows in DMS_TOPMGT_DETAILS.
There are no statistics on any of the application tables. Make sure statistics are gathered and kept up to date to enable the optimizer to determine correct execution plans.
There are no indexes on any of the FK columns or search columns. Create indexes on FK columns to improve join performance, and on searched columns to improve search performance.
More than 50% of the columns in the report query are hidden and not apparently used anywhere in the report. Why is this? A number of these columns are retrieved using scalar subqueries, which will adversely impact performance in a query processing 1 million+ rows. Remove any unnecessary columns from the report query.
A number of functions are applied to columns in the report query. These will incur processing time for the functions themselves and context switching overhead in the case of the non-kernel dbms_lob.get_length calls. Remove these function calls from the query and replace them with alternative processing that will not impact query performance, particularly the use of APEX column attributes that will only apply transformations to values that are actually displayed, rather than to all rows processed in the query.
Remove to_char calls from date columns and format them using date format masks in column attributes.
Remove decode/case switches. Replace this logic using Display as Text (based on LOV, escape special characters) display types based on appropriate LOVs.
Remove the dbms_lob.get_length calls. Instead add a file length column to the table, compute the file size when files are added/modified using your application or a trigger, and use this as the BLOB column in the query.
Searching using the Search Field text box in the APEX interactive report Search Bar generates query like:
select
from
(select
from
(...your report query...)
) r
where ((instr(upper("NWM_DOC_REF_NO"), upper(:APXWS_SEARCH_STRING_1)) > 0
or instr(upper("NWM_DOC_DESC"), upper(:APXWS_SEARCH_STRING_1)) > 0
or instr(upper("SECTION_NAME"), upper(:APXWS_SEARCH_STRING_1)) > 0
or instr(upper("CODE_TYPE"), upper(:APXWS_SEARCH_STRING_1)) > 0
or instr(upper("REF_NUMBER_INDEX"), upper(:APXWS_SEARCH_STRING_1)) > 0
or instr(upper("DATE_INDEX"), upper(:APXWS_SEARCH_STRING_1)) > 0
or instr(upper("SUBJECT_INDEX"), upper(:apxws_search_string_1)) > 0
or instr(upper("NWM_DOC_SERIEL"), upper(:APXWS_SEARCH_STRING_1)) > 0
or instr(upper("NWM_DOC_DESCRIPTION"), upper(:APXWS_SEARCH_STRING_1)) > 0
or instr(upper("NWM_DOC_STATUS"), upper(:APXWS_SEARCH_STRING_1)) > 0
or instr(upper("MIME_TYPE"), upper(:APXWS_SEARCH_STRING_1)) > 0
or instr(upper("NWM_DOC_FILE_BINARY"), upper(:APXWS_SEARCH_STRING_1)) > 0 ))
) r
where
rownum <= to_number(:APXWS_MAX_ROW_CNT)
This will clearly never make use of any available indexes on your table. If you only want users to be able to search using values from 3 columns then remove the Search Field from the Search Bar and only allow users to create explicit filters on those columns. It may then be possible for the optimizer to push the resulting simple predicates down into the inlined report query to make use of indexes on the searched column.
I have created a copy of your search page on page 33 of your app and created an After Regions page process that will create Debug entries containing the complete IR query and bind variables used so they can be extracted for easier performance analysis and tuning outside of APEX. You can copy this to your local app and modify the page and region ID parameters as required.

An visual illustration of my problem with V4's "process 2012"

Tonight's sunset taken with a Nikon D700 w/400mm f2.8 lens. Here is the same photo and its virtual copy with very little done to them yet except one is set to 2012 and the other set to 2010. both were left at Adobe Standard, then set to auto tone to get the fairest comparison possible:
2012. Notice the thick yellow transition of mostly one color. While the background looks a little clearer, you must butcher it to death in order to smooth out that ugly band.
And I am pretty sure the shadow color is very slightly "off". I realize that "off" is relative, but I would call this one "off" because it is the newer process. This 2012 color might actually look slightly better, but that's not the point --it should look identical to 2010 "as shot". But I can live with that --the big issue is what is causing the thick ugly band.
2010: Notice that the gradient from bright to dark is much smoother (and easier to work with). This is a much easier start point for developing. I'd say 10 steps max would turn this into a decent image. I have no idea if it could even be done in 2012.
This is the core of my problem with 2012 --the contrast does not work evenly across all brightnesses. They made some things look good at the great expense of others. You cannot adjust one brightness range of a photo without thoroughly trashing another.
2012 appears to work great on perfect auto-matrix-exposed photos of medium dynamic range. Another kind of photo I take are action event photos in uneven arena lighting which are all deliberately underexposed because there is no second chance to capture a winning moment (a blown-out photo will not get used by an exhibitor -- this camera body is quite forgiving of underexposure). These are similarly difficult to work with in 2012 for the same reasons.
How many types of different photos (e.g., action, portrait, landscape, various exposure extremes, etc) was this alpha version tested on? And who do they have evaluating these test results, software engineers or actual artists?
One answer might be to just keep using 2010 --that is not the point I am trying to make. That would mean this product is no longer improving for me, the user.
Any constructive feedback, suggestions, links, history lessons, etc. would be very appreciated.

Hi George,
You're welcome. And, nice view from your backyard!
Yeah, I think it's a common mistake to dive into the shadows or highlights slider before taking a good-enough whack at exposure. And, in my opinion, nothing wrong with doing that, as long as you remember that exposure is a very key adjustment in PV2012, and it should always be revisited before finalizing / fine tuning. It's always good to take a whack at contrast too before hitting highlights and shadows, but in my opinion, it is far less critical to overall tonability than exposure is. Once exposure is set correctly, you can fine tune contrast & highlights/shadows with relative impunity, but it does not work so well to try and set contrast/highlights/shadow and then fine tune exposure.
Also, it's possible that exposure needs to be set higher on average than most newerbies realize, and if it's too bright knock it down with -highlights and -blacks. The opposite may also be true for some people, I don't know. But for me, in Lr3, I was very careful not to set exposure too high for fear of blowing out the highlights (and not being a big fan of Lr3 highlight recovery), *and* I was careful not to set brightness too high to keep from washing out the midtones. Which left fill-light, which I used to brighten, but Lr3 fill would often degrade quality if pushed too hard. So, I often lived with not optimally brightened photos, brightened here or there with a touch of tone curve (and/or locals).
That same technique does not work so well in Lr4, since shadows slider may not have enough kick to it until exposure is boosted - one of the reasons people coming from Lr3 often complain about Lr4 shadows slider, before they've really learned how to set exposure.
In Lr4, highlight recovery is sorta like an improved right-side version of Lr3 fill. i.e. one can "over-brighten", and rely on highlights slider to check it (analogous to "under-brightening" in Lr3 and using fill to compensate). -whites is more akin to Lr3 highlight recovery, only different...
Another thing: I almost always start out editing with the exact same values for -highlights as +shadows. And only during fine tuning, maybe choose to diverge. It's surprising how often having those values equal and opposite can allow one to find the correct exposure, and only then, maybe, skew highlights/shadows, as a fine tuning thing.
Also, for concert photos, or any other situation when there is a big lump of really dark tones that are important, and a small lump of really light tones that are important (e.g. concert lights), and a dearth of midtones, -whites and +blacks sliders can play bigger roles than -highlights and +shadows for "recovery & fill", than in other more "normal" photos.
Lastly, my Lr4 tone curves, more often than not (and more often than in Lr3), have a debrightening shape to them, since sometimes it seems good to set exposure higher than I really want in order to achieve overall "tonability", then drop brightness strategically using the curve (and/or locals).
I'm sure other people do things differently with equal success.
PS - Where should I send the DNG? (you can contact me via PM or my website).
Final thoughts:
The "recipe" I've given here (-blacks, +whites, relatively high exposure & contrast, fairly strong -highlight = +shadows, a modicum of clarity) makes for a very punchy photo with highly detailed shadows, midtones, and highlights. I tend to like such a look on many photos - shooting landscapes and macros, etc... But it can be a bit too intense for portraits or if for whatever reason you prefer a more subtle "natural"/neutral look. One of the awesome things about PV2012 is that you can control the style of look you get. If you want the opposite, then do the opposite, e.g. easy on the -blacks or even use +blacks instead of +shadows, back off on the contrast and exposure so you need less -highlights, use whites = 0 or -whites. You can end up with a very old-school photo kinda look that way - more subtle and gentle, softer...
Rule 5: Enjoy!
Cheers,
Rob

Intermittent problem with TestStand calling CVI DLL calling MSCV DLL

Sorry about cross post, but I am not sure which group is best to address
this issue.
Setup:
Windows 2000 SP1
TestStand 2.01f
CVI 6.0
MSVC++ 6.0 SP5
Problem:
I have a CVI Test Library DLL that contains test functions called by
TestStand using the C/CVI adapter. The CVI Test Library DLL in turn makes
several calls to another DLL written in MSVC++. I am experiencing an
intermittent problem with one of the MSVC functions. The problem ~appears~
to be stack related, but I am not sure. Among other things, this MSVC
function accepts a const char * argument that is a TestStand lookup string.
The function uses this string to access the TestStand API.
What happens is this: Everything works fine. I then recompile the CVI DLL
after making some mod, then run. The MSVC++ DLL asserts that the const char
* arg passed by the CVI DLL is NULL. However, this is not the case if I
single step through the CVI code. It has happened both with passing
variables as the const char * argument and as hardcoded strings literals, so
its not that I am actually passing NULL. The other argument to this
function is the TestStand sequence context dispatch pointer (LPDISPATCH
pobjSequenceContextDisp) and it always ~appears~ to be passed correctly.
The problem is frustrating and hard to debug because I can not
deterministically reproduce it. The problem ~never~ appears when I debug my
MSVC++ DLL in Visual Studio. And it only occasionally appears otherwise.
The problem, when it appears, always appears on the first run after
recompiling the CVI DLL, though the problem does not happen after ~every~
recompilation. I'd say it happens 1 in 6 times after a recompile.
Recompiling the exact same code does not always make the problem disappear.
If I change the CVI code (code that has nothing to do with the argument
itself though) and recompile the problem almost always goes away. Selecting
'Mark all for compilation' and rebuilding does not make the problem go away.
Only tweaking the CVI code and recompiling does (usually).
Whats more, the problem appears:
* With the CVI DLL built as Debug or Release mode.
* With the CVI default calling convention set to __stdcall or __cdecl.
* With the C/CVI TestStand adapter set to run in-process or external
instance of CVI.
The problem appears to be some sort of stack or argument passing problem
between CVI and MSVC, though thats just a guess based on the symptoms. I
have quadruple checked the calling conventions of all declared functions.
The CVI DLL functions all use TX_TEST (which resolves to __cdecl). The MSVC
DLL functions all explicitly use __stdcall. Is there a problem with calling
__stdcall MSVC functions from a __cdecl CVI function?
I can find no other memory leaks or indications of memory corruption
elsewhere in either the CVI or MSVC DLLs. Its only this one function that
exhibits this strange 'null const char *' problem.
Can anyone offer any ideas about what may be causing this problem? Anything
else I should check/verify?
Regards,
Joe

Silvius,
> Although I'm not sure if any of the following are the real cause of
> your problem, I have the following suggestions:
Thanks for the reply. At this point any and all suggestions are welcome...
> 1. There could be a problem with calling
> __stdcall MSVC functions from a __cdecl CVI function. As a workaround
> wrap the _cdecl call inside a _stdcall call that is exposed or
> exported to TestStand or vice-versa. This can be a problem because if
> _cdecl is used, the calling function is responsible for cleaning up
> the stack and if _stdcall is used, the called function is responsible
> for cleaning up the stack.
I was under the impression that as long as everything was explicitly and
consistently declared, you could safely mix cdecl and stdcall f
unction
calls. Is it bad to do this? Is this a known issue with the CVI compiler?
I've never seen a problem with doing this under MSVC++.
I'll try wrapping them in cdecl calls for CVI - though we have a
depressingly large number of stdcall functions in the MSVC DLL ;-). They
need to remain stdcall in the DLL because we also call them from Visual
Basic.
> 2.Don't mix Debug version of one DLL with the Release version of the
> other DLL. I had some bad experiences doing this and both DLLs where
> developed in MSVC. Allways use either Debug either Release versions of
> DLLs.
I verified that the MSVC DLLs were either ALL Debug or Release. I too have
seen nasty problems when MSVC Debug and Release is mixed.
One thing I had not thought of until your reply: What about mixing CVI Debug
DLLs with MSVC Release DLLs? Have you ever seen issues with doing this?
Thanks!
Joe

Problems with dropped calls and no reception on Samsung Continuum

My mother and I both purchased a Samsung Continuum in late March 2011, and have experienced the same problems with the phone. The device drops at least 2-3 calls per day, often on the same conversation; we have not found that location or time of day makes a difference. The phone freezes up frequently, even if no apps are running in the background. We lose our 3G network reception frequently, and cannot access our texts, emails, or the internet. The screen saver kicks in even when we are actively dialing a number, or typing in a text message. The overall performance of the phone is also poor, and it is quite slow much of the time.
We have raised this issue several times with a representative at one of the Verizon stores, but he states that he can find no problem with the phone, and that these issues may not be covered under our insurance plan. None of my friends with non-Samsung phones are having the same problems with phone reception and performance. I am aggravated enough with these issues that I am considering reactivating my old Blackberry, which worked like a charm.
I am not upset that my phone has not been updated to Android 2.2. I just want the phone to perform as stated, and not fail at its primary function: making and receiving phone calls. I am not certain if these problems originate with the phone, Verizon, or Samsung, nor do I care. I just want to resolve these issues as soon as possible, or I will have to look at other alternatives.
Thank you.

If this doesn't work...now what??? I have a useless $400 plus piece of unreliable junk. My Motorola Razor was ions more reliable than this phone...very, very sad but true.
What carrier were you using with the Razor? AT&T? Same area?
Dave M.
MacOSG Founder/Ambassador  An Apple User Group  iTunes: MacOSG Podcast
Creator of 'Mac611 - Mobile Mac Support' (designed exclusively for an iPhone/iPod touch)

Problem with 5800, call processing is too slow.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for