Problem with Account determination

Hi all.
I have a problem with account determination when I change some data in Tcode VKOA.
For example:
I made changes in VKOA to determine G/L account 0000523201 and it worked it.
But in the account document the account that is displayed is different (0000501000) and I don´t know why.
I checked the Analysis Account Determination in VF03 and the system found the correct account in the access sequence, but I realized that there is a second line with the message G/L account in document 0000501000 . Where do I determine this account, or how Can I fix it ?
Thanks for any help.
Renato

Hi reanto
Check in VKOA all the G/L accounts for all the respective account keys. Also check wheather any provisional G/L account have been maintained or not. for any account key
Also check wheather twice if you have maintained for the same account key different G/L accounts
Regards
Srinath

Similar Messages

  • Problems with account determination analysis/revenue accounts

    Dear forum,
    I am creating a billing document from a service contract.
    When I create my billing document I receive an error message saying "Account determination error".
    I am checking my account determination analysis for revenue accounts in the billing document (Environment->Acct.Determination analysis->Revenue accounts).
    For standard condition type DIFF I receive a message 120 saying "G/L account 0000578109 determined from Account determination type KOFK" which is fine.
    But I dont get any message 215 (which should be returned under the row of message 120), and it should say "G/L account in document: 0000578109".
    Does anyone know why I dont receive the message 215 and why we receive an error message saying "Account determination error", even though we have succesful hit in the access sequence (access no 40 Sales org/Account key)?
    This is how to access sequence log looks like in revenue accounts:
    10     123     Access KOFK not carried out (initialized field)
    20     121     No G/L account found in Account determination type KOFK
    30     123     Access KOFK not carried out (initialized field)
    40     120     G/L account 0000578109 determined from Account determination type KOFK
    For access 20 (Sales org/Account assignment group/Account key) , we have specified an account assignment group on the Sold-to but not set up any account assignment for this combination. Is that what is wrong? The system expects an account for access 20 since it found the combination of Sales org/Account assignment group?
    Thanks!
    Edited by: Ola Törnblom on Dec 22, 2008 3:17 PM

    Hi,
    VKOA - check. Both KOFK and KOFI using same conditions with same G/L account.
    FS00 - check. Account exist in company code.
    This is the log in accounts revenue when everything is OK (EXAMPLE 1):
    Condition      Message     Description
    DIFF     120     G/L account 0000578109 determined from Account determination type KOFI
    DIFF     215     G/L account in document: 0000578109
    Access     Message     Description
    10     123     Access KOFI not carried out (initialized field)
    20     123     Access KOFI not carried out (initialized field)
    30     123     Access KOFI not carried out (initialized field)
    40     120     G/L account 0000578109 determined from Account determination type KOFI
    And this is the log now, when we have the error of acct determination (EXAMPLE 2):
    Condition Message     Description
    DIFF     120     G/L account 0000578109 determined from Account determination type KOFK
    Access     Message     Description
    10     123     Access KOFK not carried out (initialized field)
    20     121     No G/L account found in Account determination type KOFK
    30     123     Access KOFK not carried out (initialized field)
    40     120     G/L account 0000578109 determined from Account determination type KOFK
    For the customer we have assigned an account assignement group and it finds the account key via condition type DIFF and guess that is why we get a hit on access 20 in the example above (Message 121). But there is no G/L account entered for the combination of sales org./account assignment group/account key.
    Instead, we have chosen to have the G/L account determination based on sales org/account key only, as in access 40. And it finds the G/L account 0000578109 for access 40.
    But what I dont understand is why we dont get any message 215 as in EXAMPLE 1.
    And we get the error message "Account determination error" in EXAMPLE 2.
    Thanks,
    Ola
    Edited by: Ola Törnblom on Dec 22, 2008 4:58 PM

  • Problems with accounting integration cProjects

    Dear Sirs,
    I have some problems with accounting integration between my cProjects 3.10 and my ECC 5.0 system. I have followed the steps in the configuration guide as good I as can. However when I create a project, and go the accounting tab I get the following error:
    The project is unknown in Accounting
    Message no.
    DPR_FIN_GECCO006
    Diagnosis
    Etc..
    In the Cockpit for Controlling Integration I can see the following error at the time the project is created, and a new similar error is created when the status is set to released – replicated.
    No company code could be determined. Message No IAOM_CPROJECTS001. 
    In this message there is a reference to the fact that the company code can be set in the assigned model order for CPR1. I have created such a model order with a reference to company code 0100 for CPR1. However this does not seem to do the job.
    I seem to be stuck, as I have tried every possible and unpossible lead to get any further. Any input for someone with the knowhow is highly appreciated.
    Best regards,
    Jørgen Ruud

    Hello Jørgen,
    It sounds strange, normally after create a model order and assigned to the scenario CPR1, then the determination of company code should work.
    logic: CPR1 -> model order -> company code
    Would you please try the note 875275, if it can help.
    In case that it does not help, you can eithter use the Badi method  to set it hardly, or create a customer message to let SAP check it.
    name of Badi DPR_FIN_GECCO_ATTR
    code like following:
          ls_attribute-data_element     = space.
          ls_attribute-value            = '1000'. 
          ls_attribute-field_name_orext = 'BUKRS'.
          ls_attribute-fldname_receiver = space.
          ls_attribute-struc_name_copa  = space.
          ls_attribute-field_name_copa  = space.
          ls_attribute-ext_attr_name    = space.
          ls_attribute-ext_attr_value   = space.
          INSERT ls_attribute INTO TABLE ct_attributes.
    regards!
    Zhenbo

  • I have problem with account that i can't make update or buy from app store There is massage appear in my payment page that i must contact with i tunes support to complete this transaction Please help me to fixe this problem as soon possible Hany hassan 00

    I have problem with account that i can't make update or buy from app store
    There is massage appear in my payment page that i must contact with i tunes support to complete this transaction
    Please help me to fixe this problem as soon possible
    Hany hassan
    0096597617317
    0096596677186
    Thank you

    You need to Contact iTunes Support...
    Apple  Support  iTunes Store  Contact Us

  • Is Verizon unwilling or unable to fix problem with Account Owner(s)

    A forum or Google search reveals several customers unhappy with how Verizon treats the account owners... count me as one.  I'm sure there are many more customers who were equally unhappy but just accept Verizon's incompetence and complete the unnecessary gymnastics of un-registering accounts and then re-registering with a new username.
    PROBLEM:
    There are numerous scenarios that can cause a My Verizon account to have the Account Owner be listed with an incorrect telephone number.  In my case, I had an account with AT&T and 3 additional numbers associated.  As each account expired, I transferred the numbers to Verizon.  The first account transferred was my 14yr old son.  I registered a My Verizon account for management (my name & my userid) and eventually added the additional numbers, however, the Account Owner's phone number is listed as my son's cell.
    Over the past 2 years (since I migrated to Verizon), I've had small problems with account notifications and other information being text to my son's cell.  I've called numerous times and customer service says it's corrected, but eventually the problems return.  Recently, I upgraded my phone and started using some new services like Backup Assistant and the fact that the Account Owner is associated with an incorrect number has caused even more trouble.
    I simply want to keep my existing username for My Verizon and correct the cell phone number associated as the Account Owner.  This should be extremely simple.
    VERIZON'S SOLUTION:
    "We can't do it".  "Our systems don't allow us to make this change".
    The Customer Service Department (or Lack of Customer Service Department) tells me that since they can't or are unwilling to do the necessary changes, their only solution is to force their customer to do their work.  They will un-register the account and I can register again.  There is no concern for the preferences of an existing customer (almost 3 years); there is no concern for the inconvenience caused to an existing customer who spends hundreds of dollars each month and thousands of dollars each year (I currently have 2 separate accounts with Verizon, 4 phones on my problem account and 4 phones on another for a total of 8 phones with data plans... do the math); there is no concern that I will now have to use a completely different username one that is no longer uniform with my other accounts; there is no concern that I will have to change any and all services that reference My Verizon.  Quite simply... Verizon Wireless shows their Account Owners that they have no concern for us.
    PROPER SOLUTION:
    I have almost 25 years of Information Technology experience and over 3 years working with Call Centers (similar to Verizon's Customer Service), which explains in part why I find this so frustrating...  the fix for this is SIMPLE!!!  The real problem is that Verizon simply doesn't care enough to fix it because we are existing customers and not new customers.
    Without going into specifics (nor could I since I don't have access to their systems), data for the My Verizon portal is contained within modifiable databases.  These relational databases will be tied to other systems and other databases, but a modification of this type would just require that the portal be allowed to make the update to the appropriate field(s) within the appropriate database(s).  If direct access is not attainable because of their design, it is still not too difficult to write an additional process to accommodate this change.  These types of things are done everyday.
    More importantly, even if Verizon was unable or unwilling to make these programming changes...  I have no doubt that if Customer Service has an escalation process to their I.T. Department that a programmer with access to the application(s) and/or database(s) could easily make the change directly and almost immediately.
    CONCLUSION:
    Until now, my experience with Verizon has been mostly positive even to the point of recommending the carrier to friends and family.  I've found their coverage area to meet my needs and the data speeds to be more than satisfactory.  However, Verizon needs to remember that cellular service has essentially become a commodity and that customer retention is often based on other things than simply providing dial tone.  With a monthly cell phone expense that rivals a car payment, I would think that Verizon would be more than willing to accommodate such a simple request to maintain a satisfied customer.
    If you too are one of the many customers having issue with modifying the Account Owner, just resolve yourself that it appears Verizon is unwilling to make the simple correction to the My Verizon portal to satisfy our request.

    I'm not 100% sure that I follow your reasoning, so please correct me if I misstate your opinions.  I've numbered them so it will be easier to identify any mistakes I make.
    1.  Not allowing a user, customer service representative, or any Verizon representative to change the cell phone number associated with the Account Owner to another cell phone number on the same account is a security risk.
    I'm not suggesting that I be allowed to change the name, social security number, or any other pertinent details related to establishing the original account.  All the information pertaining to who is responsible for the bill remains the same with the single exception that the current associated cell phone number be changed to another number already listed on the account.  In what possible manner is this a security risk?  Frankly if the ability was enabled and someone either by mistake or incompetence made such a change the impact would simply be what I'm currently experiencing (inconvenience).  Since in this hypothetical situation the ability to change this value is enabled, the "inconvenience" would easily be re-mediated by returning the value to its original state.
    Furthermore, if there is some "security risk" that I'm over looking then an organization that is concerned about providing quality customer service would create procedures to accommodate customer requests and meet security requirements.  Let's use a bank (with an obvious security vulnerability) and debit cards as an example.  If I lose my debit card, I cannot go to my computer and print out a temporary debit card (very user friendly, but not secure).  Some banks will allow you to go online and cancel the lost debit card while requesting a new one to be mailed to the address you have on file (user friendly and mostly secure).  To solve this same problem at other banks might require you to go into the office and sign a form cancelling the lost debit card and confirming the address to mail you a new one (less user friendly, but highly secure).  The Verizon equivalent, is me requesting that I add an existing bank account to my online banking and being told "We can't do it".  However, because the bank cares so much about keeping me as a customer... they will delete my account, allow me to create another, possibly losing my historical data, have me change my username that I've been using for years, spend time adding all my online bill payments... all for the pleasure of staying their customer and getting to use their services as they should have been designed.
    2.  Making a software change that would allow users or CSR's to associate a different cell phone number on the account to the current Account Owner would be difficult and require downtime.
    You give some time expounding this thought and I'm unaware of your web, application, and/or database experience... but I will try to address your concerns later.  However, let's assume that you are correct and these changes will be difficult ("taking weeks to months").  The purpose of my post was whether Verizon was unwilling or unable to accommodate this customer request.  You seem to be agreeing that Verizon is unwilling to make these changes, or at the very least, feel that Verizon has decided that the time and expense involved is of more importance than correcting an issue impacting their customers.  I personally find the later equally disheartening as this has been an issue for many customers (you yourself mention experiencing the problem) and has been well documented through previous forum and Internet posts.  Even by your estimations, if they had taken previous customer complaints seriously... this would have been fixed by now.  Once again it seems the obvious answer is that Verizon may not consider customer service as an important factor as I do.
    As far as your technology issues, I agree that more than a web page change would be required.  I do take issue with comparing the change of a distributed application (operating system) that must be designed to support enumerable hardware components to the work required to makes changes to a web portal with a back-end in-house database.  You could write an entire book detailing the differences between these two scenarios as they have very little in common, but I'll try to keep it focused to your points.
    Coding
    Coding an Operating System that must run on literally a multitude of hardware configurations and support an unending diversity of applications is an incredible endeavor and really never a finished product.  Changes to an OS are constantly being made and the developers must consider hardware and software that they are not intimately familiar and occasionally even deal with 3rd parties to facilitate changes.
    The change I'm advocating has a web component which would be replicated throughout their web server topology, however, these are items that Verizon's developers deal with routinely (if not daily).  There are a very limited number of 3rd party concerns (a few different browsers, IE, Chrome, Mozilla & a disparate platforms such as PC, tablet, phone).  A little research in the benefits of web portals (and cloud computing) verses distributed applications will clearly outline the drastic differences.  A simple illustrative question (though maybe not a completely fair analogy) is how many people do you know who can code an operating system and how many people get on GoDaddy and create their own web pages.  I'm not trying to insinuate that anyone who knows a little HTML can make the web portal changes, however, this isn't a difficult project for an experienced developer.
    The bigger issues and ones that I alluded to in my original post are the changes that would be required to Verizon's back-end databases.  The changes that would need to be made mostly likely involve multiple databases and assuming they are using a typical relational database design might require changes to key fields, adding new databases/tables, and exhaustive integrity checks.  This isn't something that an average user could sit down and accomplish in an hour, however, these are simply the routine day-to-day duties of any professional database developer.
    Again I reiterate... this change simply involves allowing someone (either a user, CSR, or other Verizon agent) to readily change an index record or records that correlates Account Owner to cell phone number.  In terms of database management this should be simple.
    Debugging & Deployment
    The debugging/testing of changes made to an Operating System are amazingly complex for all the aforementioned reasons.  The deployment of such changes is even more complex in that you've got to develop the mechanism to push these changes out to the entirety of the user community.  I'll address deployment (or as you said dispersal) of this change because it's the easiest... quite simply there isn't one.  The benefit of having a centralized web portal like My Verizon is that users come to you, not the other way around, and any change made will immediately be accessible by the user community.  There is a deployment aspect in that My Verizon doesn't exist on a single web server, but again this is just the typical topology for a portal of this size and not relevant to our discussion.  Debugging/Testing is an important aspect of any change and certainly Verizon has this methodology in place, however, I'll reiterate that this change should not be complex and shouldn't require extensive testing.  We've also already discussed the fact that any debugging/testing only has to take place on a limited number of platforms.
    Downtime
    If adding the ability to change the relationship of the Account Owner to an associated cell phone number requires any downtime... the person responsible for Verizon's Development, Beta, and Production environments should be fired.  There is simply no way this is even a possible concern.  I've dealt with many companies with far less resources than Verizon and I assure you that changes of this nature would never require down time.  I'm sure they have staff in place whose sole responsibility is to work on their continuity plan.  This is a non issue.
    Other Carriers
    You can't possibly know how all carriers operate, though you may have some past experience with other companies.  I would contend (and maybe I'm too optimistic) that a company with a focus on customer satisfaction when made aware of complaints and/or limitations in their service would seek to rectify the issue.  It's quite possible that whatever other company you are referencing has fixed this issue if indeed it was similar... especially since I've hopefully bolstered my opinion that the resolution is not overly complicated.
    Would you mind telling me if you deleted your 2 original comments to my post before I had an opportunity to answer?  The reason I ask is that last night another user (jimfitzgerald) had posted a comment and I replied.  He later posted a 2nd comment and while writing my response... all the posts were removed (his 2 posts, my reply, and your 2 posts).  I'm curious if this was just a user withdrawal (though I really wish my response had remained in the thread), if there was some sort of technical issue with these forums last night, or if my response was deleted for cause by Verizon or other admin.   Thanks!

  • Login in problems with accounts

    I'm having major problems with my icloud and imessages accounts since updating from Mountain Lion to Mavericks. While I was using Mountain Lion, both accounts were linked up to my icloud.com email and NEVER experianced any problems. Then when I updated to Mavericks for some unknown reason it linked itself to my Gmail email account, which was always enlisted as a secondary email account. Now I cannot sign into my icloud (not the email account itself) because it continues to ask for me to enter a password of which it saids is incorrect. And then theres imessages - on both my iMac and iPhone, my contacts can't send me imessages nore use facetime. On there end for imessages it saids "iMessages Need to be Enable" (which under my settings it is), and for facetime it said "I'm unavailavle". After checking my online status with facetime it does indeed say I'm offline but when I try to change it to available by selecting it, it quickly closes; leaving me offline.
    I really don't want happened and have no clue what to do. The whole thing went screwy after changing to Mavericks - quite frankly I'd rather Mountain Lion back, apart from having my accounts back to my icloud accout then my gmail and having my facetime and imessages working again.

    System Preferences/iCloud - try signing out and then sign back in. I'd also try setting up your Messages account in Internet Accounts again.

  • Problem with " Account assignment category"- Services

    Hello expert,
    I have a problem with the order positions type " D" (Services). At the moment that I indicate that value in the field " Item category in purchasing document" , the field " Account assignment category" he becomes gray, preventing that can be modified later. What could do so that this field is modifiable in the future?
    Thank you!!

    hi
    1. Go to Tcode- OMH4,
    Maintain Acct assignment as "Possible" instead of not possible for Item Category "D"
    2.Go to Tcode - OMG0
    Here maintain Various Combinations of Item Category "D" and Account assignment Categories.
    Then, Acct Assignment Category field in PO item overview will be open for Item Category "D".
    Hope it helps,
    Regards,
    Rahul
    Edited by: RahulNsk on Jun 5, 2009 2:03 PM

  • Problems with Receiver Determination

    Hi everybody.
    I have started as XI developer 2 weeks ago.
    I'm trying to replicate de tbit40 exercises in our company system. when i try to make the 'Receiver Determination' somethings happen. It doesn't appear the part to write the system receiver.
    This is my scenario : file->XI->IDOC.
    I've defined in the SLD the hardware, including one PC, the XI server and the SAP 4.6c server.
    This is only a test in order to check the connectivity between the PC and SAP R3. I haven't configured yet the part of the IDOC in the R3 system. Is this necesary to view the 'subwindow' of system receiver?
    Thanks.

    Hi everybody,
    I'm having some problems with the sender agreement and the receiver determination, let me explain you the scenario: i'm trying to translate inbound plain text files to XML to a outbound interface for MDM.
    An XI consultant (expertise) has successfully created the inbound - outbound interface mappings for vendors catalog, it has worked good since he set it up, but now that i'm trying to create the materials mapping according to the manuals step by step, and when i try to create the receiver determination settings, i can't find my interface mappings, the pop-up window return 0 objects for interface mappings (that i have already created and linked with msg types).
    So what can i do? Do you have any idea?
    Regards.
    Gerardo.

  • Problem Receivable account determination, cash sales (EVV)

    Hello all,
    I need work with cash sales, billing type BV, then in the BV invoice type I have the EVV in the Account key for cash allocation.
    I create correctly the G/L account determination, introducing one account in the entry for the key EVV.
    And another for the receivables account, for example key ERL 700000
    When I save the invoice, the account determination procedure works correctly, it found the account 700000, but the FI doc is not generated....
    If i delete the EVV from the BV, the determination work correctly (accoutn 700000) but the cash account is not determined because I delete the EVV.
    ¿why is the reason?¿why it doesn't work when the BV have the EVV? I miss some customizing?¿depend of the definition of the FI accounts?
    Best regards,
    Javier

    Hi Javier,
    To begin with why you need to maintain both EVV and ERL in account determination?
    The purpose of the account key in Billing document control is :-
    Account key for cash allocation
    account key that causes the system to post to a G/L account rather than to a receivables account. You can enter G/L accounts for the key entered in account assignment. (Account determination can be found in Basic Functions).
    Use
    You can use this to allow cash transactions to be carried out directly for the customer rather than receivables being created.
    So this means that once you maintain the Account key for cash allocation,Direct entry will hit the relavant GL account rather than creating a receivable entry.
    In your case you are trying to do both the things at same time.
    In my view either you should maintain EVV or ERL.
    Hope you will try and let me kow if it works allright
    Reward points if useful
    Regards,
    Amrish Purohit

  • Back to my mac can't start - problem with account

    Having problems with Back to my Mac in Mavericks for one of my machines.  Get the message, "Back to my Mac can't start because of a problem with your account.  Sign out, sign back in, and try again.  If this problem persists, restart your computer.
    Tried cleaning out keychains and resetting icloud password, along with signing in/out of icloud, but no success.  Anyone else see this problem?

    Hi MarkDeBower,
    Thanks for using Apple Support Communities.  This article has some steps you can try if you are unable to use Back to My Mac:
    OS X: Using and troubleshooting Back to My Mac with your iCloud account
    http://support.apple.com/kb/ht4907
    Cheers,
    - Ari

  • Problem with text determination procedure

    here we r finding text determinations procedures for purchase order in spro - img conflagration as follows materialmanagement-purchasing-messages-text for messages-define text for po.by going here i had a view where both header and item text for different po is maintained.
    now i want this text to be printed in my purchase order every time with different item selected there should be different item text should be selected.
    1. the major problem when inserting into medruck form as  insert-text-standard text, here it selecting the text object as TEXT BUT FOR DIFFERENT MATERIALS IT SHOULD SELECT MATERIAL as text object then only i can retrieve the material text's.
    if any one can forward a document r help to solve this problem and solution suggestions.
    this is a very important requirement.pls forward it as early as possible,
    thanx with regards...
    hareesh tadepalli

    Raj,
    Thanks for your suggestion.  This would be a possiblity going forward, but we have existing tickets that would still be missing the interaction text.  This apparently worked before we upgraded to SP 14, so I don't think there is a problem with our configuration.
    I created some new test tickets, and found that the interaction text is still being copied and saved in the ticket log, even after text is added to the ticket.  The problem is that the interaction text is not visible from IC Web.  It is visible when looking at the ticket in the SAP GUI (transaction CRMD_ORDER).
    For example, here is the contents of the Log text as seen in SAP GUI (I use "TICKET" or "INTERACTION" in the text to indicate where the text originated):
    General Note
    06/03/2009          11:14:36            M305755
    TICKET - general note
    General Note
    06/03/2009          11:13:59            M305755
    INTERACTION - general note
    Technical Problem
    06/03/2009          11:13:59            M305755
    INTERACTION - technical problem
    Here is the contents of the Log text as seen in IC Web:
    General Note
    06/03/2009          11:14:36            M305755
    TICKET - general note
    Martin

  • Problem with account

    Hello, sry for my bad english, i just cant connect into my acc 2days, i use 100% good pw, and its saying bad pass.. when i use "problem with sing in" and it send me code on mail, i use all what it need and when i want change new pass, it dont change it and show me link for technical support, any1 know how fix it please? (rly sry for my english :x)

    How to Contact Skype Customer Service
    IF YOU FOUND OUR POST USEFUL THEN PLEASE GIVE "KUDOS". IF IT HELPED TO FIX YOUR ISSUE PLEASE MARK IT AS A "SOLUTION" TO HELP OTHERS. THANKS!
    ALTERNATIVE SKYPE DOWNLOAD LINKS | HOW TO RECORD SKYPE VIDEO CALLS | HOW TO HANDLE SUSPICIOS CALLS AND MESSAGES
    SEE MORE TIPS, TRICKS, TUTORIALS AND UPDATES in
    | skypefordummies.blogspot.com | 

  • Problem with ORG Determination in Transactions

    I am having an issue with ORG determination in Business Transactions
    The Organization area is not being populated as required.
    I want to pull in the org data from the User (Org data set in Sales Area section of the BP), all users have the same org data, when running the transaction this is not working, this used to work ok but no longer does??
    Settings in org data profile is set to '14000146 - Org. Unit Using Transaction Type', this brings back two errors:
    1 - No organizational units found
    2 - No organizational unit could be selected
    I have tried using the 10000194 - UserOrgUnit but this causes a pricing determination error relating to config
    any ideas anyone??
    regards
    Barry

    Hello Barry,
    To use rule 14000146, you need to add the used transaction type as an attribute of the org. unit that you want it to be determined.
    To do this, please execute t-cd ppoma_crm, open your org. unit, go to the [Attributes] tab, add the transaction type into the 'Transaction Type' attibute, then check on 'Obj. permitted in determination' save.
    Wiith rule 10000194 you got the org. unit determined. For the pricing error, I think it might be related to the pricing procedure determination. If yes, please check your IMG activity:
    SPRO
    - CRM
      - Basic Functions
       - Pricing
        - Pricing in the Business Transaction
         - Determine Pricing Procedures
    Here, the Sales organization, Dis. Channel, Division are the org. data determined in the transaction; the Doc. Pricing Procedure is the one defined in the transaction type (IMG activity: Define Transaction Types->Assignment of Business Transaction Categories-> BUS2000115 -> Customizing header -> field 'Doc. Pric.Proc.'); the Cust. Pricing Procedure is taken from the sold-to party's BP master sales area data (in the billing) tab.
    Hope the information could be helpful.
    Best regards,
    Maggie

  • Problem in accounting determination

    Hi ... All  ,
    Billing document is raised ... accounting document is generated ( for both excise and commercial ) .But while I am checking commercial accounting document , plant is not coming for that ... rest all are coming i.e value , profit centre etc.
    Actually this is a cst rate (JCST ) condition type .
    There in condition record it is maintained in country / region of delivery plant / tax cll 4 cust / plant / billing type .
    Condition record is maintained properly . There it is assigned with one tax code .
    That tax code is assigned with one G/L in OB40 .
    Every thing is coming while I am checking commercial a/c . determination except plant .
    So the problem occurs while finance guys are checking their report in plant specific area , they are unable to find the amount .
    PLS ADVC .....

    Hi.,
    Please try this
    In SPRO
    S&D - Sales - Lists - Define Selection Criteria
    You can include the field - WERKS as follows
    Prg Name  - SAPMV65A
    Trans Grp  - 7
    Disp Grp   - K
    Event       - SELK
    It             - 9
    Fieldname - WERKS
    Hope this works
    Thanks
    Pravin

  • HT201304 problem with account settings

    can you help with this email I received?
    There was a technical problem that prevented us from automatically renewing your subscription for Pandora One. To avoid interruption of your subscription, first sign in to the iTunes Store from your device. Next, tap Manage App Subscriptions in your account settings and select your desired subscription period. We will then attempt your subscription renewal again.

    Read this:
    http://support.apple.com/kb/HT4098

Maybe you are looking for