Problem with accounting in group currency ( tbb1 )
Dear all,
to use the group currency, we created a new valuation area.
In case of a new exchange rate we need to account transactions in the correct way; to do this we applied sap notes:
- 1526242 u2013 TBB1: Incorrect amount in valuation
- 1407845 u2013 TPM18: Incorrect amount in valuation currency
but the document created are with the old exchange rate.
Some of you can tell me if there is something else to do ?
Thanks.
Elena
Hi Elena,
...which setting have you choosen in customizing (TRM > General Settings > Accounting > Organization > Assign Accounting Codes and Valuation Areas)?
See F1-Help for field Translation:
"_" Different Valuation Currency: The amount in valuation currency is only translated if the valuation currency is different to the local currency. If the valuation currency and local currency are the same, the amount is transferred.
"1" Always Translate: The amount in valuation currency is always translated from the amount in position currency
"2" If the amount is not fixed: The valuation currency is usually translated from the amount in position currency, like the always translate setting. If you have fixed the amount in local currency or the exchange rate of the payment to local currency in transaction management, the amount in local currency is transferred.
Regards,
Lorenz
Similar Messages
-
Hard currency is not valuated in FAGL_FC_VAL along with local and group currency
Hi All,
I have the below system settings for FOREX revaluation. The revaluation is not happening for Hard currency along with local and group currency. The test data and other settings seams to be fine as the below mentioned workaround works perfectly for hard currency revaluation.
I would like to take your expert feedback on this issue to confirm whether this is how SAP works or its an issue with FAGL_FC_VAL program.
System Settings:
Currencies in company code
local currency group currency hard currency
10 30 40
USD USD UYU
FOREX settings:
Work around found:
Define two Valuation area, say
1. Valuation Area: A1 which will have currency type 10 and 30.
2. Valuation Area: A2 which will have only the currency type 40.
3. Run FAGL_FC_VAL twice for these area.
Issue with this work around:
1. The valuation area is assigned to one accounting principle (which is in turn assigned to a specific ledger).
2. Thus, if I have different accounting FOREX process to be followed in different ledgers (say IFRS ledger, Local Ledger, Tax ledger) then I need to create 2 valuation area (as per above workaround) for each ledgers and run FAGL_FC_VAL for each of these valuation areas.
Thanks & Regards
Nikhil KothariHi Experts,
Any views on the above issue?
Thanks & Regards
Nikhil Kothari -
I have problem with account that i can't make update or buy from app store
There is massage appear in my payment page that i must contact with i tunes support to complete this transaction
Please help me to fixe this problem as soon possible
Hany hassan
0096597617317
0096596677186
Thank youYou need to Contact iTunes Support...
Apple Support iTunes Store Contact Us -
Is Verizon unwilling or unable to fix problem with Account Owner(s)
A forum or Google search reveals several customers unhappy with how Verizon treats the account owners... count me as one. I'm sure there are many more customers who were equally unhappy but just accept Verizon's incompetence and complete the unnecessary gymnastics of un-registering accounts and then re-registering with a new username.
PROBLEM:
There are numerous scenarios that can cause a My Verizon account to have the Account Owner be listed with an incorrect telephone number. In my case, I had an account with AT&T and 3 additional numbers associated. As each account expired, I transferred the numbers to Verizon. The first account transferred was my 14yr old son. I registered a My Verizon account for management (my name & my userid) and eventually added the additional numbers, however, the Account Owner's phone number is listed as my son's cell.
Over the past 2 years (since I migrated to Verizon), I've had small problems with account notifications and other information being text to my son's cell. I've called numerous times and customer service says it's corrected, but eventually the problems return. Recently, I upgraded my phone and started using some new services like Backup Assistant and the fact that the Account Owner is associated with an incorrect number has caused even more trouble.
I simply want to keep my existing username for My Verizon and correct the cell phone number associated as the Account Owner. This should be extremely simple.
VERIZON'S SOLUTION:
"We can't do it". "Our systems don't allow us to make this change".
The Customer Service Department (or Lack of Customer Service Department) tells me that since they can't or are unwilling to do the necessary changes, their only solution is to force their customer to do their work. They will un-register the account and I can register again. There is no concern for the preferences of an existing customer (almost 3 years); there is no concern for the inconvenience caused to an existing customer who spends hundreds of dollars each month and thousands of dollars each year (I currently have 2 separate accounts with Verizon, 4 phones on my problem account and 4 phones on another for a total of 8 phones with data plans... do the math); there is no concern that I will now have to use a completely different username one that is no longer uniform with my other accounts; there is no concern that I will have to change any and all services that reference My Verizon. Quite simply... Verizon Wireless shows their Account Owners that they have no concern for us.
PROPER SOLUTION:
I have almost 25 years of Information Technology experience and over 3 years working with Call Centers (similar to Verizon's Customer Service), which explains in part why I find this so frustrating... the fix for this is SIMPLE!!! The real problem is that Verizon simply doesn't care enough to fix it because we are existing customers and not new customers.
Without going into specifics (nor could I since I don't have access to their systems), data for the My Verizon portal is contained within modifiable databases. These relational databases will be tied to other systems and other databases, but a modification of this type would just require that the portal be allowed to make the update to the appropriate field(s) within the appropriate database(s). If direct access is not attainable because of their design, it is still not too difficult to write an additional process to accommodate this change. These types of things are done everyday.
More importantly, even if Verizon was unable or unwilling to make these programming changes... I have no doubt that if Customer Service has an escalation process to their I.T. Department that a programmer with access to the application(s) and/or database(s) could easily make the change directly and almost immediately.
CONCLUSION:
Until now, my experience with Verizon has been mostly positive even to the point of recommending the carrier to friends and family. I've found their coverage area to meet my needs and the data speeds to be more than satisfactory. However, Verizon needs to remember that cellular service has essentially become a commodity and that customer retention is often based on other things than simply providing dial tone. With a monthly cell phone expense that rivals a car payment, I would think that Verizon would be more than willing to accommodate such a simple request to maintain a satisfied customer.
If you too are one of the many customers having issue with modifying the Account Owner, just resolve yourself that it appears Verizon is unwilling to make the simple correction to the My Verizon portal to satisfy our request.I'm not 100% sure that I follow your reasoning, so please correct me if I misstate your opinions. I've numbered them so it will be easier to identify any mistakes I make.
1. Not allowing a user, customer service representative, or any Verizon representative to change the cell phone number associated with the Account Owner to another cell phone number on the same account is a security risk.
I'm not suggesting that I be allowed to change the name, social security number, or any other pertinent details related to establishing the original account. All the information pertaining to who is responsible for the bill remains the same with the single exception that the current associated cell phone number be changed to another number already listed on the account. In what possible manner is this a security risk? Frankly if the ability was enabled and someone either by mistake or incompetence made such a change the impact would simply be what I'm currently experiencing (inconvenience). Since in this hypothetical situation the ability to change this value is enabled, the "inconvenience" would easily be re-mediated by returning the value to its original state.
Furthermore, if there is some "security risk" that I'm over looking then an organization that is concerned about providing quality customer service would create procedures to accommodate customer requests and meet security requirements. Let's use a bank (with an obvious security vulnerability) and debit cards as an example. If I lose my debit card, I cannot go to my computer and print out a temporary debit card (very user friendly, but not secure). Some banks will allow you to go online and cancel the lost debit card while requesting a new one to be mailed to the address you have on file (user friendly and mostly secure). To solve this same problem at other banks might require you to go into the office and sign a form cancelling the lost debit card and confirming the address to mail you a new one (less user friendly, but highly secure). The Verizon equivalent, is me requesting that I add an existing bank account to my online banking and being told "We can't do it". However, because the bank cares so much about keeping me as a customer... they will delete my account, allow me to create another, possibly losing my historical data, have me change my username that I've been using for years, spend time adding all my online bill payments... all for the pleasure of staying their customer and getting to use their services as they should have been designed.
2. Making a software change that would allow users or CSR's to associate a different cell phone number on the account to the current Account Owner would be difficult and require downtime.
You give some time expounding this thought and I'm unaware of your web, application, and/or database experience... but I will try to address your concerns later. However, let's assume that you are correct and these changes will be difficult ("taking weeks to months"). The purpose of my post was whether Verizon was unwilling or unable to accommodate this customer request. You seem to be agreeing that Verizon is unwilling to make these changes, or at the very least, feel that Verizon has decided that the time and expense involved is of more importance than correcting an issue impacting their customers. I personally find the later equally disheartening as this has been an issue for many customers (you yourself mention experiencing the problem) and has been well documented through previous forum and Internet posts. Even by your estimations, if they had taken previous customer complaints seriously... this would have been fixed by now. Once again it seems the obvious answer is that Verizon may not consider customer service as an important factor as I do.
As far as your technology issues, I agree that more than a web page change would be required. I do take issue with comparing the change of a distributed application (operating system) that must be designed to support enumerable hardware components to the work required to makes changes to a web portal with a back-end in-house database. You could write an entire book detailing the differences between these two scenarios as they have very little in common, but I'll try to keep it focused to your points.
Coding
Coding an Operating System that must run on literally a multitude of hardware configurations and support an unending diversity of applications is an incredible endeavor and really never a finished product. Changes to an OS are constantly being made and the developers must consider hardware and software that they are not intimately familiar and occasionally even deal with 3rd parties to facilitate changes.
The change I'm advocating has a web component which would be replicated throughout their web server topology, however, these are items that Verizon's developers deal with routinely (if not daily). There are a very limited number of 3rd party concerns (a few different browsers, IE, Chrome, Mozilla & a disparate platforms such as PC, tablet, phone). A little research in the benefits of web portals (and cloud computing) verses distributed applications will clearly outline the drastic differences. A simple illustrative question (though maybe not a completely fair analogy) is how many people do you know who can code an operating system and how many people get on GoDaddy and create their own web pages. I'm not trying to insinuate that anyone who knows a little HTML can make the web portal changes, however, this isn't a difficult project for an experienced developer.
The bigger issues and ones that I alluded to in my original post are the changes that would be required to Verizon's back-end databases. The changes that would need to be made mostly likely involve multiple databases and assuming they are using a typical relational database design might require changes to key fields, adding new databases/tables, and exhaustive integrity checks. This isn't something that an average user could sit down and accomplish in an hour, however, these are simply the routine day-to-day duties of any professional database developer.
Again I reiterate... this change simply involves allowing someone (either a user, CSR, or other Verizon agent) to readily change an index record or records that correlates Account Owner to cell phone number. In terms of database management this should be simple.
Debugging & Deployment
The debugging/testing of changes made to an Operating System are amazingly complex for all the aforementioned reasons. The deployment of such changes is even more complex in that you've got to develop the mechanism to push these changes out to the entirety of the user community. I'll address deployment (or as you said dispersal) of this change because it's the easiest... quite simply there isn't one. The benefit of having a centralized web portal like My Verizon is that users come to you, not the other way around, and any change made will immediately be accessible by the user community. There is a deployment aspect in that My Verizon doesn't exist on a single web server, but again this is just the typical topology for a portal of this size and not relevant to our discussion. Debugging/Testing is an important aspect of any change and certainly Verizon has this methodology in place, however, I'll reiterate that this change should not be complex and shouldn't require extensive testing. We've also already discussed the fact that any debugging/testing only has to take place on a limited number of platforms.
Downtime
If adding the ability to change the relationship of the Account Owner to an associated cell phone number requires any downtime... the person responsible for Verizon's Development, Beta, and Production environments should be fired. There is simply no way this is even a possible concern. I've dealt with many companies with far less resources than Verizon and I assure you that changes of this nature would never require down time. I'm sure they have staff in place whose sole responsibility is to work on their continuity plan. This is a non issue.
Other Carriers
You can't possibly know how all carriers operate, though you may have some past experience with other companies. I would contend (and maybe I'm too optimistic) that a company with a focus on customer satisfaction when made aware of complaints and/or limitations in their service would seek to rectify the issue. It's quite possible that whatever other company you are referencing has fixed this issue if indeed it was similar... especially since I've hopefully bolstered my opinion that the resolution is not overly complicated.
Would you mind telling me if you deleted your 2 original comments to my post before I had an opportunity to answer? The reason I ask is that last night another user (jimfitzgerald) had posted a comment and I replied. He later posted a 2nd comment and while writing my response... all the posts were removed (his 2 posts, my reply, and your 2 posts). I'm curious if this was just a user withdrawal (though I really wish my response had remained in the thread), if there was some sort of technical issue with these forums last night, or if my response was deleted for cause by Verizon or other admin. Thanks! -
Problem with Shopping cart's currency
Hello,
I've got a problem with shopping cart's currency. I create the shopping cart with 1 item currency "EUR", I see in my backend ECC 5.0 , my purchase requisition have got a currency in "CHF".
System SRM : SRM 5.5
System ECC : 5.0
The scenario for approval shopping cart is automatic, the workflow WS1000060 is active.
Can you help me please, thanks very much.
LionelHi Sambit,
Yes I found the solution.
You must implemente this BADI BBP_CREATE_BE_RQ_NEW with method FILL_RQ_INTERFACE.
You can see my code :
METHOD if_ex_bbp_create_be_rq_new~fill_rq_interface.
DATA : wa_requisition_items TYPE bbps_badi_rq_item,
wa_item TYPE bbp_pds_transfer_item,
w_tabix TYPE sy-tabix,
w_check.
LOOP AT cs_rq_document-it_requisition_items INTO wa_requisition_items.
w_tabix = sy-tabix.
READ TABLE is_sc_document-item INDEX w_tabix INTO wa_item.
IF wa_requisition_items-currency NE wa_item-currency.
wa_requisition_items-currency = wa_item-currency.
wa_requisition_items-c_amt_bapi = wa_item-gross_price.
ENDIF.
MODIFY cs_rq_document-it_requisition_items FROM wa_requisition_items INDEX w_tabix.
CLEAR : wa_requisition_items,
wa_item.
ENDLOOP.
ENDMETHOD.
I hope that will help you.
Kind regards.
Lionel
Edited by: Lionel Lacotte on Jun 24, 2008 2:22 PM -
Problem with showing a group of records in dynamic page (PLS-00428 error)
Hi
I have problems with viewing a group of records from db. I've created Page, which "Page Type" attribute is "PL/SQL". In "PL/SQL Code" field, I've written very simple SQL query: "SELECT * FROM PORTAL_DEMO.EMP ;"
I'd like to generate HTML table with it's result. Unfortunately, every time I get the same Exception:
Error 30584: DBMS_SQL has raised an unhandled exception. ORA-06550: line 1, column 7: PLS-00428: an INTO clause is expected in this SELECT statement
Is it necessary to write a COURSOR (and use HTP function) to realize this functionality? I succeed, trying this way - but it is very uncomfortable ( a lot of code ).
What I have done in wrong way?
Please help me.
Best regards
MarioHow do I handle this?
-
Problems with accounting integration cProjects
Dear Sirs,
I have some problems with accounting integration between my cProjects 3.10 and my ECC 5.0 system. I have followed the steps in the configuration guide as good I as can. However when I create a project, and go the accounting tab I get the following error:
The project is unknown in Accounting
Message no.
DPR_FIN_GECCO006
Diagnosis
Etc..
In the Cockpit for Controlling Integration I can see the following error at the time the project is created, and a new similar error is created when the status is set to released replicated.
No company code could be determined. Message No IAOM_CPROJECTS001.
In this message there is a reference to the fact that the company code can be set in the assigned model order for CPR1. I have created such a model order with a reference to company code 0100 for CPR1. However this does not seem to do the job.
I seem to be stuck, as I have tried every possible and unpossible lead to get any further. Any input for someone with the knowhow is highly appreciated.
Best regards,
Jørgen RuudHello Jørgen,
It sounds strange, normally after create a model order and assigned to the scenario CPR1, then the determination of company code should work.
logic: CPR1 -> model order -> company code
Would you please try the note 875275, if it can help.
In case that it does not help, you can eithter use the Badi method to set it hardly, or create a customer message to let SAP check it.
name of Badi DPR_FIN_GECCO_ATTR
code like following:
ls_attribute-data_element = space.
ls_attribute-value = '1000'.
ls_attribute-field_name_orext = 'BUKRS'.
ls_attribute-fldname_receiver = space.
ls_attribute-struc_name_copa = space.
ls_attribute-field_name_copa = space.
ls_attribute-ext_attr_name = space.
ls_attribute-ext_attr_value = space.
INSERT ls_attribute INTO TABLE ct_attributes.
regards!
Zhenbo -
Problem with Account determination
Hi all.
I have a problem with account determination when I change some data in Tcode VKOA.
For example:
I made changes in VKOA to determine G/L account 0000523201 and it worked it.
But in the account document the account that is displayed is different (0000501000) and I don´t know why.
I checked the Analysis Account Determination in VF03 and the system found the correct account in the access sequence, but I realized that there is a second line with the message G/L account in document 0000501000 . Where do I determine this account, or how Can I fix it ?
Thanks for any help.
RenatoHi reanto
Check in VKOA all the G/L accounts for all the respective account keys. Also check wheather any provisional G/L account have been maintained or not. for any account key
Also check wheather twice if you have maintained for the same account key different G/L accounts
Regards
Srinath -
HI
I have a strange problem concerning group call pickup in lync 2013.the pickup calls on snom 710 having only a second delay, but in lync client it having about 5-7 second
Anybody out there having similar problems with call pickup Groups?Hi,
Did you meet any other call delay when you using Lync?
As the issue happen for Lync desktop client, it can be performance issue. Please check if there is any error message from FE Server when the issue happen.
Also please check if you have updated Lync Server to the latest version, if not, update it and then test again.
Best Regards,
Eason Huang
Eason Huang
TechNet Community Support -
ACS 5.3 Authorization problem with using Identity Groups in Access Policy Rule
Hello guys, I am found a problem which I can't solve regarding authorization with using Identity Groups in Access Policy rule.
ACS version: 5.3.0.40.6 (internal build B.839)
I have very simple RADIUS Authorization rule which authorize user on behalf of right Identity Group.
Requested Identity Group exist
Testing user is created in Internal Users and has assigned requested Identity Group
Radius Access Policy:
Authentication against Identity Store Sequence, where authorization server is external RSA SecurID device and additional attributes retrieval is configured from Internal Users.
Authorization is very simple – One Rule with only one Condition which is: Identity Group - in - Requested_Testing_Rule. Then Default rule is set to Deny.
When I will try login with my testing user then authentication against RSA SecurID is OK, but authorization will be denied by Default rule – It looks like my Rule with Identity Group is totally omitted.
I am managing several other ACS servers (version 5.3 but with older patches) where similar rules are working without problem.
What I am tested:
Remove testing user and create his account again.
Rename Identity Group
Use another Identity Group
Remove Access Policy rule and create it again
Use Compound Condition: System:Identity Group
Use Compound Condition: System:UserID instead of Identity Group in Rule (it is working without problem)
Do you have any idea where problem can be?OK guys, it started working yesterday without any configuration change. Maybe it was some database inconsistence wich was solved by ACS itself.
-
Problem with decimal in Japan currency
Hi Gurus,
I have a problem with Japan currency that when When i take the printout of document with JPY 5,168,277 it is wrongly printing as 51,682.77 but in document display it is showing correclty as 5,168,277. But when i check this in BSEG table it was wrong updated as 51,682.77 (WRBTR field) i hope it is picking the amount from this field for printing .
For the above i made changes in OY01 but i find there was no use.
In OY01 the decimal place setting is 1,234,567.89 the middle one of the three.
When i post the same amount to japan co code in currency JPY and if i check in BSEG table
Amount in LC 51,682.77
Amount (WRBTR) 51,682.77
Orig.reduction 0.00
G/L amount 5,168,277
When i post the same amount in non japan co code in JPY Currency and check in BSEG(area where i am facing problem)
Amount in LC 47,550.22
Amount (WRBTR) 51,682.77
Orig.reduction 0.00
G/L amount 5,168,277
Please tell me how to correct this.May ne u can check this OSS note also 137626
Summary
Symptom
1. Which currencies have to be defined separately with regard to the number of decimal places?
2. What do I need to observe when maintaining decimal places for currencies?
3. Which Customizing presettings does SAP deliver in table TCURX (decimal places for currency codes)?
4. Does SAP deliver the Customizing presettings of decimal places for currency codes (Table TCURX) for upgrade installations?
5. Which information does SAP use for the specification of these Customizing presettings?
Solution
1. question: Which currencies have to be defined separately with
regard to the number of decimal places?
Answer:
The number of decimal places can vary for currencies. Currencies which do not have two decimal places must be defined in table TCURX (decimal places for currency codes).
You can maintain this table via the R/3 Implementation Guide (Global Settings -> Currencies, Transaction OY04).
If a currency is not defined in Table TCURX (decimal places for currency codes), this currency is regarded as currency with two decimal places.
2. question: What do I need to observe when maintaining decimal places
for currencies?
Answer:
During operation, you must neither delete currencies used nor change their definition of decimal places. Amounts in posted documents could become invalid or incorrect as a result.
3. question: Which Customizing presettings does SAP deliver in table
TCURX (decimal places for currency codes) ?
Answer
At present, SAP delivers the following Customizing presettings for table TCURX:
ISO Currency Decimal places
Code
ADP Andoran Peseta 0
AFA Afghani Afghani 0
BEF Belgian franc 0
BHD Bahraini dinar 3
BIF Burundi franc 0
BYB Belorussian rubel (old) 0
BYR Belorussian rubel (new) 0
CLP Chilean peso 0
COP Columbian peso 0
DEM3 (Internal) German Mark (3 Dec.) 3
DJF Djibouti franc 0
ECS Ecuadorian sucre 0
ESP Spanish peseta 0
GNF Guinea franc 0
GRD Greek drachma 0
HUF Hungarian forint 0
IDR Indonesian rupiah 0
IQD Iraqui dinar 3
ITL Italian lira 0
JOD Jordan dinar 3
JPY Japanese yen 0
KMF Comoros franc 0
KRW South Korean won 0
KWD Kuwaiti dinar 3
LAK Laos new kip 0
LUF Luxembourg franc 0
LYD Libyan dinar 3
MGF Madagascan franc 0
MZM Mozambique metical 0
OMR Omani rial 3
PTE Portugese escudo 0
PYG Paraguay guarani 0
ROL Roumanian Lei 0
RWF Rwanda franc 0
TJR Tadzhikistani rubel 0
TMM Turkmenistani manat 0
TND Tunesian dinar 3
TPE Timor escudo 0
TRL Turkish lira 0
TWD New Taiwan dollar 0
UGX Uganda shilling 0
USDN (Internal) US Dollar (5 dec.pl.) 5
VND Vietnamese dong 0
VUV Vanuata vatu 0
XAF CFA Franc BEAC 0
XOF CFA Franc BCEAO 0
XPF CFP Franc 0
4. question: Does SAP deliver the Customizing presettings of decimal
places for currency codes (Table TCURX) for upgrade
installations?
Antwort
Table TCURX (decimal places for currency codes) is a client-independent table of the delivery class "C" (Customizing table). Therefore the table contents for this table can only be delivered with new installations.
For upgrade installations, new or changed contents of Table TCURX are not delivered.
5. question: Which information does SAP use for the specification of
these Customizing presettings?
Answer
Currency codes and decimal places for currency codes are defined in ISO standard 4217. For the specification of decimal places for currency codes, SAP uses this ISO standard.
For some currencies, for example, for the "Turkish lira", the decimal places which are used in reality deviate from the ISO definition. In many of these cases, SAP decided to adhere to the definitions generally used.
Example:
ISO standard 4217 defines two decimal places for the Turkish lira (TRL), however in reality zero decimal places are being used for the Turkish lira. SAP delivers zero decimal places as Customizing presetting for "Turkish lira".
Header Data
Release Status: Released for Customer
Released on: 14.08.2007 13:12:09
Priority: Recommendations/additional info
Category: FAQ
Primary Component: XX-CSC-XX Country specific Customizing & Functionality (Standard R/3)
Secondary Components: FI Financial Accounting
Releases
Release Independant
Related Notes
434349 - Change of decimal places of currencies
126531 - Collective note preliminary availability Colombia
Print Selected Notes (PDF) -
Problem with depreciation area (Incorrect currency exchange rate is used)
Good day to all SDN forumers!
I'm having a problem with one depreciation area that we set up. The reason why we configured this depreciation area is for us to enable to monitor all asset postings in another (group) currency aside from the local currency. We set it up in such a way that the depreciation would not post and would thus only "convert" the asset postings to group currency using the table rates in table TCURR (via OB08).
The problem is despite having defined an exchange rate for the current period, the system still picks up the exchange rate for 01/01/2001 which is incorrect. This affected all reports which displays incorrect values whenever I view the postings using the 2nd depreciation area we set up. Is there a way we can correct this?
I'd really appreciate your comments and suggestions guys. Thanks a lot and more power!Update:
I created a new depreciation area by copying an existing area and updated some of the configuration. The problem is still there though, since the depreciation area still reflects the <b>incorrect</b> rate (similar to that of the previous depreciation area) whenever I access it using Asset Explorer. What's surprising is that even though I've already set the exchange rate (e.g. USD to EUR) to match that of the asset's capitalization / acquisition date, the posted values still do not reflect what I defined in table TCURR. Instead, it reflects the exchange rate used by the old depreciation area. Help anyone? We are already in a production client and transfer/retirement of all the assets is not an option the client would like to undertake.
Edited by: Patrick on Nov 6, 2008 4:45 AM -
Ke5z with amount in group currency
Dear all,
i need to have the amount in group currency in transaction KE5Z or another similar report.
Some of you can help me?
thanks for help,
regards,
Elenathanks for your help,
i tried to execute the transaction but i receved no items.
I need to have all items posted in a month related to an account.
I executed the report with the same parameters used with transaction ke5z.
Regards,
Elena Tremolada -
Terminal Server Licensing Problems with GPO Security Group License Server
Hello,
I have two fresh installs of W2K12R2.
One is RD Session Host and the other one is the License Server. Everything is fine until I active the GPO Security Group License Server. After that the License Server gives no licenses
to die clients (we have User und Device CALs). TS Licensing Diagnostic’s shows no errors, the number of available licenses is displayed correctly, even the state of GPO Security Group License Server is correctly shown as "active" and die
Membership in the Group "RDS-Endpointserver" is "Yes". Eventlog shows no Errors. Log in on the session host is even possible, maybe because the RDS-Service is in evaluation time.
If the GPO Security Group License Server is disabled again, the server starts to serve licenses as expected.
I don’t know what I can do anymore, never had problems with exact the same setup under W2K8, but with W2K12 is the second time I notice this issue.
Thanks for your ideas,
AndreasHi Andreas,
Thank you for posting in Windows Server Forum.
Sorry to inform but there is no official document for server 2012 related to this event, you can go through below article for reference.
You cannot use a security group to add computer accounts to the Terminal Server Computers group. You must add each computer account explicitly. To verify whether an RD Session Host server is allowed to request RDS CALs from the Remote Desktop license server,
you can use the IsSecureAccessAllowed method of Win32_TSLicenseServer class. For more details about this method, click here.
1. License Diagnosis tool returns error "License server <computer name> cannot issue RDS CALs to the Remote Desktop Session Host Server because the 'License server security group' Group
Policy setting is enabled."
2.Control the Issuance of RDS CALs
Note: You should only enable this policy setting when the license server is a member of a domain. You can only add computer accounts for RD Session Host servers to the RDS Endpoint Servers group when the license server is a member of a domain.
Hope it helps!
Thanks,
Dharmesh -
Login in problems with accounts
I'm having major problems with my icloud and imessages accounts since updating from Mountain Lion to Mavericks. While I was using Mountain Lion, both accounts were linked up to my icloud.com email and NEVER experianced any problems. Then when I updated to Mavericks for some unknown reason it linked itself to my Gmail email account, which was always enlisted as a secondary email account. Now I cannot sign into my icloud (not the email account itself) because it continues to ask for me to enter a password of which it saids is incorrect. And then theres imessages - on both my iMac and iPhone, my contacts can't send me imessages nore use facetime. On there end for imessages it saids "iMessages Need to be Enable" (which under my settings it is), and for facetime it said "I'm unavailavle". After checking my online status with facetime it does indeed say I'm offline but when I try to change it to available by selecting it, it quickly closes; leaving me offline.
I really don't want happened and have no clue what to do. The whole thing went screwy after changing to Mavericks - quite frankly I'd rather Mountain Lion back, apart from having my accounts back to my icloud accout then my gmail and having my facetime and imessages working again.System Preferences/iCloud - try signing out and then sign back in. I'd also try setting up your Messages account in Internet Accounts again.
Maybe you are looking for
-
Copying pictures from Aperture 3
My wife wants to upload some of our picutres to the Costco web site for printing. She's been copying the individual images from Aperture to a folder on our desktop. In doing so she's noticed that the individual file sizes are quite small and that the
-
My Macbook has a Kernel Panic when trying to boot from Mac OS Install DVD
It might also be relevant that my Accounts Preference Panel crashes System Preferences when I try to open it. Disk Utility sees no problems with my drive, and booting into single user mode and doing a disk check has no results. I am running a 2010 Ma
-
I tried holding the power off/home button simultaneously however, this resulted in nothing. I need my phone!!
-
Problem in Create Requisition Request E-recruitment
Hi, I have configured the standard workflow WS45600028 for the E-recruitment process in HR administration services and able to trigger the workflow successfully when I create requisition in the portal. But the workflow fails at the first step 'Import
-
Stocks iPhone Application isn't working on 2G after 2.2 Update
Hi, ever since i updated the Software on my 2G Phone to 2.2, the Stocks application started behaving erratic. The daily value of stock, for example, AAPL, apple, shows the numeric value as well as the graphical movement of the stock price. The graph