Problem with Alert rules

Hi All,
I created 6 alert rules in Alert configuration of RWB.
One of them is 'AE related alert'. For this, error occurance place is Adapter Engine and Adapter type is '*'. This is related to an alert caletory 'AE alerts'
Other 5 alerts are IE related alerts for which error occurance places are Adapter, Application, Server, Protocol & Server. All these are related to an alert category 'IE Alerts'.
For all the alert rules, Rule Active is Checked, Supress multiple alerts is not checked, connected to a message is YES, sender and receiver party/service/int/int namespace are all '*'.
Now, wheneveran error occurs, say for example mapping related error, i am getting 5 alerts from all the 5 IE related rules.
My expectation is, only one of the alerts should be sent. How can i achieve this?
Many Thanks
Chandra

Hi Prakasu
In my scenario, i do not want to use 'supress multiple alerts'.
By doing this, i will supress alert from 2nd message, till the alert from the 1st message is confirmed(both messages belonging to same interface).
I want to supress multiple alerts for the same message.
As i said earlier, i have multiple alert rules for problems in different areas (proxy, mapping, server, ).
When there is a problem in mapping, all the 5 alerts belonging to different error categories are being sent.
I only want one alert to be sent.
Many Thanks
Chandra

Similar Messages

Problem with alert Configuration screen ( RWB)

Hi,
I had configured Aertcatdef in development and alert rules in alert configuration in RWB,
I am moving from DEV to QUA , Alertcatdef is moved and i am defining rules in Alertconfiguration.
I am getting only half screen of Alert configuration. I refreshed the cache but no use.
Can any one tell the solution for the above problem.
Regards,
Shaik

Hi shaik,
The following manual changes are required in u r server.
1.) Select the SXMSALERT package in transaction SE80.
2.) Open the nodes BSP library -> BSP applications -> SXMS_AlertRules ->Views.
3.) Open the AddRule.htm view in the Workbench.
4.) In rows 5, 11 and 41, replace "50%" with "100%".
Regards,
Jayasimha Jangam

Problem with business rule

Hi all,
I have a problem with a business rule (BR) deployed as a standalone Descision service.
the BR consists on a simple decision table wich compare an input (bigInteger) with 50. It returns two facts (as output).
the two conditions are confugured (i.e. <50 and >=50).
the Decision service (stateless) is called in a simple BPEL process. in some cases the the assign activity in the bpel process rise this exception :
<bpelFault><faultType>0</faultType><selectionFailure xmlns="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2003/03/business-process/"><part name="summary"><summary>empty variable/expression result. The XPath variable or expression /ns5:callFunctionStatelessDecision/ns5:resultList/ns6:processResponse/ns6:CodeRetour is empty at line 440. An attempt to read or copy data referenced or computed by the XPath expression either had invalid data, according to the XML schema, or did not contain certain optional data. Ensure that the variable or expression result named in the error message is not empty. Enable XML schema validation of related variables to ensure the run-time data is valid. </summary></part></selectionFailure></bpelFault>
it seems like an output of the business rule used by the assign after the invoke activity is empty.
But in the input payload for the decision service all elements are not empty. I can't inderstand how the OBR return an empty variable?
Any help please?

In the taskflow you should be capable to trace step by step what happens in the execution. Does this give any clue, e.g. why sometimes the assert does not work?
cu
Andreas

Problem with Business Rules in OBPM 10.3.1 Enterprise for WebLogic

We're having a problem with our Business Rules. We've updated two of our business rules (that are used by business rule transitions) in Studio; however, when we publish the updated process, the business rules are not updated. We cannot find anywhere in the Process Admin where to administer the rules to make sure they're overwritten.
I've double checked, and the updated rule code is in the .project.xpdl, but for whatever reason, the rules are not being updated during the deployment. I'm sure that we've done this many times in the past, but for some reason, now it is not working.
We're tried variations of the different versioning when we publish, and we've also tried to unpublish all of the older versions of our process, but it does not change the business rules. We can try to unpublish and undeploy, but it seems like we would lose all old instances of that process that are still running if we did that.
Has anyone ever had this issue, or know if there is a way to effect the business rules via the process admin?

I see what you're saying, but here's why it works the way you're observing it.
Once deployed, the 10g business rules are edited by a business user (the owner of the rule). Changes in Studio that a developer makes to a business rule don't override the changes that the business user made.
To let the business owner edit the rule, add a Global Interactive activity and change its property setting to edit the business rule. Put this activity in the role for the business owner (the person you want to edit the rule).
Dan

Problem with alerts via mail

Hi everybody.
I' ve customized an alert to receive a mail when the mapping fails in a intefase.
At first time when the error ocurred i could see in the integration engine monitor that the interfase had an error and i recived a mail to inform me about that.
Later I could see more messages with the same error in the integration engine monitor but I didn´t receive any mail.
Now, althoug error messages for that interfase get to integration engine monitor with error I don´t get any mail.
What could be happenning??
Regards

Hi Christian,
First check the Alert configuration in RWB and check there the interface name and the error location is correct and also check the Alert Inbox whether you are getting any messages.Then check in ABAP stack SU01 the mail address (Recipients in ALRTCATDEF t-code).
- In case you are getting any messages in RWB's Alert inbox and not to your email address, then check the given email address in SU01.
- If you are not getting any messages in the RWB's Alert inbox then check your Alert rule configuration.
Regards,
Prasanna

Problem with scrambling rules

Good afternoon, I have a problem with the conversion rules, when I transfer the employee does not take into account any of the scrambling rules, those made by me and with the rules that I copied by CNV_TDMS_HCM_SCRAM transaction. I understand that this conversion is performed in the task to prepare data transfer. Someone can give me an idea that I may fail to do. Somebody has documentation of Scrambling rules? Thanks in advance.
Manuel Campos

Thank you, when I execute the program wherever Phase or activity ID that I select, for example PC001_RULES_MAINTAIN
It shows me this:
Rules for packege 90042
Rule Name                     Status         Active
CNV_MBT_BOP             red              check
INITIAL                           red             check
MOVE                            red             check
01_RVNUM_CK_DGT      red             check
99_HR_PEVAL2              red             check
99_PD_SEQ_NR             red             check
ADDR_SCRAM1             green          check
SAMP_SCR_DOM          red             check
SAMP_SCR_FIELD        green          check
In your package appear something like this?
I used transaction CNV_TDMS_HCM_SCRAM to prepare and maintain customizing for
scrambling at project or subproject level. And I made this:
To use the SAP template, choose Copy from other Project. You can now copy a scramble
definition. To copy the SAP template, input the following:
Pack ID: TDHSC
Project: *
Subproject: *
Process Type: R
Select the "Get from client 000" checkbox .
You can use a description prefix, for example SAP_, to easily identify elements. For
example, if you use this prefix and the name of a scramble group in the template is
HCM_DE_01, then after the copy the name is SAP_HCM_DE_01. This is useful for copying
in add-on mode into an existing project, because it helps you to determine what was new
from this copy.
Then I tried to use this scrambling rules copied, but They doesn´t work.
Thanks a lot for your help

Problem with Settelment Rule for iw32

Hi,
Good day guys
Iam getting the problem while creating the settelment rule creation. Ive got a problem with " wa_srules-SOURCE = '1' ".
If i wont fill this field, settelment rule is going to be created. but i need to fill this field as per requirement.
Ive got a error message "Enter an Existing source assingment for souce stracutre CS.
Plz any one guide me, how to overcome this prob
DATA: srules TYPE srules_ext OCCURS 0,
 wa_srules TYPE srules_ext,
 lv_mandt type SYMANDT.
DATA IT_OBJNR TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF IONRB WITH HEADER LINE.
DATA: ls_copadata type BAPI_COPA_DATA occurs 0.
DATA: ls_cobrb type standard table of cobrb with header line.
IT_OBJNR-OBJNR = CAUFVD_IMP-OBJNR.
APPEND IT_OBJNR.
break-point.
CALL FUNCTION 'K_SRULE_PRE_READ'
EXPORTING
 I_PFLEGE = ' '
TABLES
 T_SENDER_OBJNR = IT_OBJNR
* T_COBRA =
EXCEPTIONS
 WRONG_PARAMETERS = 1
 OTHERS = 2
CALL FUNCTION 'K_SETTLEMENT_RULE_EXISTENCE'
EXPORTING
 objnr = caufvd_imp-objnr
* FLG_LOCAL = ' '
* IMPORTING
* E_COBRA =
EXCEPTIONS
 RULE_NOT_FOUND = 1
 OTHERS = 2
CALL FUNCTION 'K_SRULE_CREATE'
EXPORTING
 i_objnr = caufvd_imp-objnr
* I_CHECK_ONLY_LOCAL = ' '
* IMPORTING
* E_COBRA =
EXCEPTIONS
rule_already_exists = 1
OTHERS = 2.
wa_srules-SOURCE = '1'.
wa_srules-settl_type = 'FUL'.
wa_srules-percentage = '100'.
*wa_srules-amount = ''.
wa_srules-COMP_CODE = caufvd_imp-bukrs.
*wa_srules-PROFIT_CTR = caufvd_imp-PRCTR.
*wa_srules-costcenter = caufvd_imp-kostl.
wa_srules-costcenter = '10-60'.
APPEND wa_srules TO srules.
wa_srules-SOURCE = '1'.
wa_srules-settl_type = 'PER'.
wa_srules-percentage = '100'.
*wa_srules-amount = ''.
wa_srules-COMP_CODE = caufvd_imp-bukrs.
*wa_srules-PROFIT_CTR = caufvd_imp-PRCTR.
*wa_srules-costcenter = caufvd_imp-kostl.
wa_srules-costcenter = '10-60'.
APPEND wa_srules TO srules.
CALL FUNCTION 'K_ORDER_SRULE_ADD'
EXPORTING
 object_no = caufvd_imp-objnr
* IMPORTING
* FLG_RULE_INSERTED =
tables
 srules = srules
IF sy-subrc = 0.
commit work.
Endif
Regards
Edited by: balaji kiran on Mar 26, 2010 10:18 AM

Hello Vitaliy,
Nice to "see" you here
I did try remodelling and it works fine here. A constant value rule really gets a constant value.
The user exit option also works fine here. Here's an example of a very simple user exit for a KF:
method IF_RSCNV_EXIT~EXIT.
FIELD-SYMBOLS: <l_s_old> TYPE ANY,
 <l_fillfield> TYPE ANY,
 <l_newfield> TYPE ANY,
 <fs_kfsource> type any.
* Assign the references to field symbols
ASSIGN c_r_newfield->* TO <l_newfield>.
ASSIGN i_r_old->* TO <l_s_old>.
* We will use the value of the 0AMOUNT KF. The value of the new KF is 0AMOUNT + 5.
ASSIGN COMPONENT 'AMOUNT' OF STRUCTURE <l_s_old> TO <fs_kfsource>.
<l_newfield> = <fs_kfsource> + 5.
endmethod.
For a KF, you can check the fields of the FACT Table (/BIx/Fzzzz) to know the field names for your source KFs.
Hope this helps.

Problem With Alert Category SCM EM 5.0

I have just updated my EM 4,0 to 5,0 and I have problems with the categories of alert, in the part of messages by mail. I do it correctly when configuring them like was doing it in the version 4 declaring in the containers the name of the paraameter of information and type, but when in the transaction SOST I see the very result the first character of the piece of information that is supposed to all data reflect appears they are declared correctly and in the HEY are everything like parameters of information.
Somebody is able to tell to himself that it can be happening
Thanks . . . Alberto

somebody can helpme

Problems with Alerts in DFM 3.2.0

Hello, I have this problem with DFM 3.2.0 in LMS 3.2 running on windows 2008
High Severity Alerts show this message:
An exception occurred.Please check the AAD.log file for further details.
In the attached file is that log

Please start a new thread for your issue and describe your exact problem in detail.

Problems with Alert Configuration on SP19

All,
I have configured alerts couple of time. This is first time I am doing it on SP19 systems.
I faced some problems and it seems to be not that consistent.
Can any one tell me if they had any problems with this.
reg,

Hi All,
Another update,
Incase the alert will be visible in other users inbox with a Confirmed Tick Mark only once. Next time he logs in the alert wont be visible in his inbox.
Sorry for the confusion..
Thought will update you again..
Just confirmed one more alert in my system with ABC user id. It was not visible in the XYZ users inbox even with a tick mark.
So whatever is the case if someone confirms a alert other users will be able to know that the alert has been confirmed by a tick mark or the alert will not visible in there inbox.
Cheers,
Sumit
Message was edited by:
Sumit Khetawat

SOS Problem with navigation rules

Hello,
I have been stuck for some time with a navigation problem: It seems my faces DD is read but the navigations rules are not. Unfortunately it does not give me any exception. The only thing that occurs is that the home page reloads itself instead of redirecting to the second page.
Here is my DD:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE faces-config PUBLIC "-//Sun Microsystems, Inc.//DTD JavaServer Faces Config 1.0//EN" "http://java.sun.com/dtd/web-facesconfig_1_0.dtd">
<faces-config>
 
 <application>
 <locale-config>
 <default-locale>en</default-locale>
 </locale-config>
 </application>
 
 <managed-bean>
 <managed-bean-name>GuideSearchManagedBean</managed-bean-name>
 <managed-bean-class>com.softwareag.test_guide.web.temp.PGSearchManagedBean</managed-bean-class>
 <managed-bean-scope>session</managed-bean-scope>
 </managed-bean>
 
 <navigation-rule>
 <from-view-id>/home.jsp</from-view-id>
 <navigation-case>
 <from-action>#{GuideSearchManagedBean.newSearchAction}</from-action>
 <from-outcome>displayResults</from-outcome>
 <to-view-id>/errorOccured.jsp</to-view-id>
 </navigation-case>
 </navigation-rule>
</faces-config>Here is my jsf:
<%@ taglib uri="http://java.sun.com/jsf/html" prefix="h" %>
<%@ taglib uri="http://java.sun.com/jsf/core" prefix="f" %>
<f:view>
<html>
<head>
<title>home</title>
</head>
<body>
<h:form id="guide_form">
category
<h:selectOneMenu id="category" value="#{GuideSearchManagedBean.category}" required="true">
<f:selectItem itemValue="2" itemLabel="resto"/>
<f:selectItem itemValue="1" itemLabel="bar"/>
<f:selectItem itemValue="3" itemLabel="disco"/>
</h:selectOneMenu>
 
postcode 
<h:selectManyListbox id="postcodes" value="#{GuideSearchManagedBean.postcodes}" required="true">
<f:selectItem itemValue="75001" itemLabel="75001"/>
<f:selectItem itemValue="75002" itemLabel="75002"/>
<f:selectItem itemValue="75003" itemLabel="75003"/>
<f:selectItem itemValue="75004" itemLabel="75004"/>
<f:selectItem itemValue="75005" itemLabel="75005"/>
<f:selectItem itemValue="75006" itemLabel="75006"/>
</h:selectManyListbox>
 
name
<h:inputText id="name" value="#{GuideSearchManagedBean.name}"/>
 
with comments
<h:selectBooleanCheckbox id="commentsExist" value="#{GuideSearchManagedBean.commentsExist}"/>
 
order by
<h:selectOneRadio id="sortOrderCriterion" value="#{GuideSearchManagedBean.sortOrderCriterion}" layout="pageDirection">
<f:selectItem itemValue="GRADES" itemLabel="note"/>
<f:selectItem itemValue="DB_ESTABLISHMENT_NAME" itemLabel="name"/>
<f:selectItem itemValue="DB_POSTCODE" itemLabel="postcode"/>
</h:selectOneRadio>
 
minimum note
<h:selectOneMenu id="minimumNote" value="#{GuideSearchManagedBean.minimumNote}">
<f:selectItem itemValue="1" itemLabel="1"/>
<f:selectItem itemValue="2" itemLabel="2"/>
<f:selectItem itemValue="3" itemLabel="3"/>
<f:selectItem itemValue="4" itemLabel="4"/>
<f:selectItem itemValue="5" itemLabel="5"/>
</h:selectOneMenu>
 
<h:commandButton id="submit" action="#{GuideSearchManagedBean.newSearchAction}" value="Submit" />
</h:form>
</body>
</html>
</f:view>Here is my Managed bean:
package com.softwareag.test_guide.web.temp;
import java.rmi.RemoteException;
import java.util.List;
import com.softwareag.test_guide.web.util.PGFactory;
* @author Julien Martin
public class PGSearchManagedBean {
 private String category;
 private List postcodes;
 private String name;
 private boolean commentsExist;
 private String sortOrderCriterion;
 private int minimumNote;
 public String newSearchAction(){
 System.out.println("----------within new search action--------------");//this line never gets printed
 return "displayResults";
 public String nextAction() throws RemoteException { //TODO: Remove that
 PGSearch search = PGFactory.getSearchInstance();
 String issue = search.next();
 return issue;
 public String previousAction() throws RemoteException { //TODO: Remove that
 PGSearch search = PGFactory.getSearchInstance();
 String issue = search.previous();
 return issue;
 public String getCategory() {
 return category;
 public boolean getCommentsExist() {
 return commentsExist;
 public int getMinimumNote() {
 return minimumNote;
 public String getName() {
 return name;
 public List getPostcodes() {
 return postcodes;
 public String getSortOrderCriterion() {
 return sortOrderCriterion;
 public void setCategory(String string) {
 category = string;
 public void setCommentsExist(boolean bool) {
 commentsExist = bool;
 public void setMinimumNote(int i) {
 minimumNote = i;
 public void setName(String string) {
 name = string;
 public void setPostcodes(List list) {
 postcodes = list;
 public void setSortOrderCriterion(String string) {
 sortOrderCriterion = string;
}Can anyone help? I am really stuck. :-)
Julien Martin.

Hi,
I added a messages component to your home.jsp page and saw that the page produced validation errors (often the cause for failed navigation).
The problem is that the beans property minimumNote expects an int but gets a String. When you change the the type in the bean to String it works.
You will probably want to add a converter to the uicomponent to get the correct type. I'd be happy to tell you how, but I'm just starting with jsf ;-).

Problem with a rule in workflow

Hello, i have a workflow that use a rule for assign inbox of the users,
when i test the rule it seem to be good, because in the result i can see the right user.
In my workflow i have 4 levels of authorizations.
The first level works well, but the second not.
1) Information for agent determination for step
0000000013.
A problem occurred when determining the recipient for step 0000000013. This problem does not lead to execution being canceled.
2) Error in resolution of rule 'AC99800002' for step '0000000013'
The function module for rule 'AC99800002' initialized an exception and returned a message ("MESSAGE ... [RAISING ...]").
3) No agent found
How can i resolve this issue?
Thanks

If you use responsibilities, you should check if you have all options covered. There shouldn't be an input variable for which no outcome is defined. So take a good look at the rule again.
And as suggested you can test it with the input variables you have in the container of the workflow.
Regards,
Martin

Problem with navigation-rules

Hello!!!
I'm using Jboss Jbpm with JSF and I want to navigate to other page when I fill a form and I send the data that I entered. I have declare the navigation-rules but it doesn't work and I don't know why.
In my faces-config.xml I've added the navigation-rules:
<managed-bean>
 <managed-bean-name>usuario</managed-bean-name>
 <managed-bean-class>com.miApp.UserBean</managed-bean-class>
 <managed-bean-scope>request</managed-bean-scope>
 </managed-bean>
 <navigation-rule>
 <from-view-id>/SolicitarAlta.xhtml</from-view-id>
 <navigation-case>
 <from-action>#{usuario.registrar}</from-action>
 <from-outcome>correcto</from-outcome>
 <to-view-id>/results/correcto.jsp</to-view-id>
 </navigation-case>
 </navigation-rule>
 The UserBean has the method registrar:
public String registrar() {
 if(dni==null || nombre==null || apellidos==null || ocupacion==null || mail==null || tlf==null ||
password==null)
 return "campos-obligatorios";
 if ((mail.trim().length() < 3) || (mail.indexOf("@") == -1))
 return "mail-incorrecto";
 else if(tlf.length()!=9) return "telefono-incorrecto";
 else if(dni.length()!=8) {return "dni-incorrecto";}
 return "correcto";
 And with this line:
<h:commandButton type="submit" value="Enviar" action="#{usuario.registrar}"/> the method registrar is executed and I know that this method returns the string "correcto" but ... This doesn't redirect me to the page correcto.jsp
I thought that maybe if SolicitarAlta was an xhtml file the correcto page should be also an .xhtml file. I changed it but it doesn't work.
Any ideas? Could it be that I have to add something more in the faces-config.xml & web.xml file???
Thx!

I found the solution to my problem but I don't really understand why it was not working. My problem was due to the use of command button with a render set to false. I just put them at true and all my navigation rules work!
If someone know why it was not working, I would be glad to know!

Problem with udev rule to disable touchpad when USB mouse connects

Hi, I've been running Arch on this laptop, but I can't get this udev rule to work properly.
What I want to happen is: when I plug in my usb mouse, the laptop touchpad is disabled, and the left and right buttons are reversed (I'm left handed)
After following several tutorials, both from the arch wiki and other sites, I've come up with this udev rule:
ACTION=="add", SUBSYSTEM=="input", RUN+="/usr/local/bin/USBMouse.sh"
ACTION=="remove", SUBSYSTEM=="input", RUN+="/usr/local/bin/USBMouse.sh"
And here's the script it links to (USBMouse.sh):
#!/bin/bash
export DISPLAY=:0.0
synclient TouchPadOff=$(/usr/bin/lsusb | grep "Microsoft Corp.\
Nano Transceiver v1.0 for Bluetooth" | wc -l)
if [[ $(/usr/bin/lsusb | grep "Microsoft Corp.\
Nano Transceiver v1.0 for Bluetooth" | wc -l) == 1 ]]
then
xmodmap -e 'pointer = 3 2 1'
fi
if [[ $(/usr/bin/lsusb | grep "Microsoft Corp.\
Nano Transceiver v1.0 for Bluetooth" | wc -l) == 0 ]]
then
xmodmap -e 'pointer = 1 2 3'
fi
Running the script from a terminal returns no errors and works as expected. The problem is when I plug/unplug the mouse from the usb port, nothing happens.
I appreciate any insight you might have about how to fix this, and thank you in advance

This has already been done. And another relevant thread.

Problem with academic rule in report

Hello,
I have an academic rule that uses the Module Booking Single callup point (0003) and the checking is provided by an user-exit
The problem is that the rule Works fine through the transaction PIQST00 -> Change Module booking, (dialog mode) but when the hriq_student_booking function is called from a report, the rule doesn't check.
We have another academic rules created as this one, and they work fine in both environments (dialog and through HRIQ_STUDENT_BOOKING into a report)
I debugged the report and the value returned for this rule by sy-subrc is zero, when the expected value for a negative check result is nine
Any comments about this will be of great help.
Regards,
Diego

Hi Diego,
Within HRIQ_STUDENT_BOOKING we have the parameters IV_DIALOG and IV_MODE control the way the function responds when error messages are returned on a module booking (including VSR rule messages). Please check how are this parameters used in your implementation of the RFC.
I attach a brief documentation of the usage.
IV_DIALOG = D.- Technical errors will stop process immediately (RETURN_CODE = 4, message in EXP_OBJECT_SUBRC). With this option business errors will be collected by message handler (filtered by user customization) and displayed by VSR tool. If there is at least one remaining error message, no database update will be possible (RETURN_CODE = 4), but if user accepted displayed messages then the database update is processed.
IV_DIALOG =B.- Technical errors will stop process immediately (RETURN_CODE = 4, message in EXP_OBJECT_SUBRC). With this option business errors will be collected into global table GT_OBJECT_SUBRC, filtered by message handler and exported; if there is at least one remaining error message
no database update is done (RETURN_CODE = 4) if there are no errors database update is processed (RETURN_CODE = 0).
IV_MODE = T.- Test mode, no database update is processed, RETURN_CODE = 0 -> update would be processed without any problems RETURN_CODE = 4 -> update would not have been processed with the given module list due to errors (all messages are collected into ET_RETURN).
IV_MODE = V.- Database update is processed if no business errors are detected (such as VSR rules).
IV_MODE = F.- Database update even if business errors are detected (Overriding rules).

Problem with Alert rules

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for