Problem with copy client
Hi!
I need to copy (scc9) productive system to QA and have mistake what the overflow lock table. I implement note 1039834, set parameter enque/table_size 16384, run 2 enq process in central instance. But the problem has not dared.
Please help me.
Hello,
You say "run 2 enq process " .
There has to be only "one" enqueue request for a system.
Please check and correct your wp via tx-code rz10.
Arzu Kosdemir
Similar Messages
-
A problem with copy/paste from extract panel in Dreamweaver 2014.1.1
I have a problem with copy/paste from extract panel in Dreamweaver 2014.1.1 :
Russian letters pasting in dreamweaver html in such way: ffd0 ff9e ffd0 ff9a ffd0 ff9e ffd0 ff9c ffd0 ff9f ffd0 ff90 ffd0 ff9d ffd0 ff98 ffd0 ff98
Can you help? What could it be?Hi,
I test the issue with my colleague and didn't find the same issue.
Here is the screenshot:
So please check if Lync Server 2013 and all the issued Lync 2013 client update to the latest version firstly, it not update to the latest version, update it and then test again.
Best Regards,
Eason Huang
Eason Huang
TechNet Community Support -
Problem with Variable Client Support
Hello,
I work with Labview 8.5 and Crio 9014.
I have a problem with Variable Client Support. When I try to compile my project I have the following error:
"The Network Variable Engine and Variable Client Support must be installed on the RT target for this application to function properly..."
I have read that we have to install the Variable Client Support in Measurement and Automation by right-clicking on the software and then choosing add/remove software but I can't install the appropriate shared variable components because I can't see neither Network Variable Engine and Variable Client Support. So what can I do?
Can somebody help me?
ThanksI have exactly the same problem. I wanted go through the "Getting Started with the LabVIEW RT module" and when I use wizard for generating new project I get same notification in my VI...
The Network Variable Engine and Variable Client Support must be installed on the RT target
for this application to function properly. If the Network Variable Engine is not supported on
the target (e.g. FP-2000 with <32MB of RAM), open the project and move the variable library
to My Computer in the project. Doing this will deploy the variables to localhost but
will still require that Variable Client Support be installed on the RT target.
Could someone help please ?
Attachments:
ni.png 95 KB -
A problem with copying text from english pdf to a word file
i have a problem with copying text from english pdf to a word file. the english text of pdf turns to be unknown signs when i copy them to word file .
i illustrated what i mean in the picture i attached . note that i have adobe acrobat reader 9 . so please help cause i need to copy text to translate it .Is this an e-book? Does it allow for copying? It is possible that the pdf file is a scan of a book?
-
Problem with Copied Business Object : SELFITEM
Hi,
sub: Problem with Copied Business Object : SELFITEM
I want to use changed selfitem BOR for carbon copy functionality. For it, i copied the BOR : SELFITEM. it is giving error
In SWI2_DIAG it is showing like this.
Work item cannot be read
Work item 000000639770: Object method SWW_BI_EXECUTE_S cannot be executed
The problem is with COPYING The Business Object. Because , generally we extend BOR ,not copy. But i did copy.
Please help me regarding this.
Balaji.T.hi Martin,
The problem may not be in method. because simply we copied the BO:SELFITEM into ZSELF . And i want to test this for a mail at first , whether copied BOR is working or not.The mail is not triggering . it is saying that it is Error.
WF_BATCH error...
I can see error in Tx: SWI2_DIAG ,
this is Error :
Work item 000000639770: Object method SWW_BI_EXECUTE_S cannot be executed
Once it is rectified i can modify the method in BO:ZSELF.
Thank you in Advance..
Balaji.T. -
Hello,
I experiance problems with QuickVPN client (version 1.4.1.2). I'm trying to connect to router SA520 with 1.1.65 firmware,
vpn tunell is established, but client says "The remote gateway is not responding. Do you want to wait?"
in case i click no, it drops vpn tunell
QuickVPN client log looks like this:
2010/08/18 12:13:27 [STATUS]OS Version: Windows 7
2010/08/18 12:13:27 [STATUS]Windows Firewall Domain Profile Settings: ON
2010/08/18 12:13:27 [STATUS]Windows Firewall Private Profile Settings: ON
2010/08/18 12:13:27 [STATUS]Windows Firewall Private Profile Settings: ON
2010/08/18 12:13:27 [STATUS]One network interface detected with IP address 192.168.1.100
2010/08/18 12:13:27 [STATUS]Connecting...
2010/08/18 12:13:27 [DEBUG]Input VPN Server Address = vpn.in-volv.lv
2010/08/18 12:13:28 [STATUS]Connecting to remote gateway with IP address: 78.28.223.10
2010/08/18 12:13:28 [WARNING]Server's certificate doesn't exist on your local computer.
2010/08/18 12:13:30 [STATUS]Remote gateway was reached by https ...
2010/08/18 12:13:30 [STATUS]Provisioning...
2010/08/18 12:13:39 [STATUS]Success to connect.
2010/08/18 12:13:39 [STATUS]Tunnel is configured. Ping test is about to start.
2010/08/18 12:13:39 [STATUS]Verifying Network...
2010/08/18 12:13:44 [WARNING]Failed to ping remote VPN Router!
2010/08/18 12:13:47 [WARNING]Failed to ping remote VPN Router!
2010/08/18 12:13:50 [WARNING]Failed to ping remote VPN Router!
2010/08/18 12:13:53 [WARNING]Failed to ping remote VPN Router!
2010/08/18 12:13:56 [WARNING]Failed to ping remote VPN Router!
2010/08/18 12:14:08 [WARNING]Ping was blocked, which can be caused by an unexpected disconnect.
2010/08/18 12:14:12 [STATUS]Disconnecting...
2010/08/18 12:14:15 [STATUS]Success to disconnect.
Server logs look like this:
2010-08-18 12:28:49: INFO: Adding IPSec configuration with identifier "arvils"
2010-08-18 12:29:02: INFO: Configuration found for 83.243.93.200[500].
2010-08-18 12:29:02: INFO: Received request for new phase 1 negotiation: 78.28.223.10[500]<=>83.243.93.200[500]
2010-08-18 12:29:02: INFO: Beginning Identity Protection mode.
2010-08-18 12:29:02: INFO: Received Vendor ID: MS NT5 ISAKMPOAKLEY
2010-08-18 12:29:02: INFO: Received Vendor ID: RFC 3947
2010-08-18 12:29:02: INFO: Received Vendor ID: draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-02
2010-08-18 12:29:02: INFO: Received unknown Vendor ID
2010-08-18 12:29:02: INFO: Received unknown Vendor ID
2010-08-18 12:29:02: INFO: Received unknown Vendor ID
2010-08-18 12:29:02: INFO: Received unknown Vendor ID
2010-08-18 12:29:02: INFO: For 83.243.93.200[500], Selected NAT-T version: RFC 3947
2010-08-18 12:29:02: INFO: NAT-D payload matches for 78.28.223.10[500]
2010-08-18 12:29:02: INFO: NAT-D payload does not match for 83.243.93.200[500]
2010-08-18 12:29:02: INFO: NAT detected: PEER
2010-08-18 12:29:02: INFO: Floating ports for NAT-T with peer 83.243.93.200[4500]
2010-08-18 12:29:02: INFO: ISAKMP-SA established for 78.28.223.10[4500]-83.243.93.200[4500] with spi:e2cd855a75fc0887:6dc3b2e025152444
2010-08-18 12:29:02: INFO: Sending Informational Exchange: notify payload[INITIAL-CONTACT]
2010-08-18 12:29:02: INFO: Responding to new phase 2 negotiation: 78.28.223.10[0]<=>83.243.93.200[0]
2010-08-18 12:29:02: INFO: Using IPsec SA configuration: 192.168.75.0/24<->192.168.1.100/32
2010-08-18 12:29:02: INFO: Adjusting peer's encmode 3(3)->Tunnel(1)
2010-08-18 12:29:02: INFO: IPsec-SA established[UDP encap 4500->4500]: ESP/Tunnel 83.243.93.200->78.28.223.10 with spi=47693803(0x2d7bfeb)
2010-08-18 12:29:02: INFO: IPsec-SA established[UDP encap 4500->4500]: ESP/Tunnel 78.28.223.10->83.243.93.200 with spi=1079189482(0x40531fea)
2010-08-18 12:35:57: INFO: an undead schedule has been deleted: 'pk_recvupdate'.
2010-08-18 12:35:57: INFO: Purged IPsec-SA with proto_id=ESP and spi=1079189482(0x40531fea).
2010-08-18 12:40:46: INFO: Configuration found for 83.243.93.200[500].
2010-08-18 12:40:46: INFO: Received request for new phase 1 negotiation: 78.28.223.10[500]<=>83.243.93.200[500]
2010-08-18 12:40:46: INFO: Beginning Identity Protection mode.
2010-08-18 12:40:46: INFO: Received Vendor ID: MS NT5 ISAKMPOAKLEY
2010-08-18 12:40:46: INFO: Received Vendor ID: RFC 3947
2010-08-18 12:40:46: INFO: Received Vendor ID: draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-02
2010-08-18 12:40:46: INFO: Received unknown Vendor ID
2010-08-18 12:40:46: INFO: Received unknown Vendor ID
2010-08-18 12:40:46: INFO: Received unknown Vendor ID
2010-08-18 12:40:46: INFO: For 83.243.93.200[500], Selected NAT-T version: RFC 3947
2010-08-18 12:40:46: INFO: NAT-D payload matches for 78.28.223.10[500]
2010-08-18 12:40:46: INFO: NAT-D payload does not match for 83.243.93.200[500]
2010-08-18 12:40:46: INFO: NAT detected: PEER
2010-08-18 12:40:46: INFO: Floating ports for NAT-T with peer 83.243.93.200[4500]
2010-08-18 12:40:46: INFO: ISAKMP-SA established for 78.28.223.10[4500]-83.243.93.200[4500] with spi:28447d39874689f9:a2b7da19d8d86413
2010-08-18 12:40:46: INFO: Responding to new phase 2 negotiation: 78.28.223.10[0]<=>83.243.93.200[0]
2010-08-18 12:40:46: INFO: Using IPsec SA configuration: 192.168.75.0/24<->192.168.1.100/32
2010-08-18 12:40:46: INFO: Adjusting peer's encmode 3(3)->Tunnel(1)
2010-08-18 12:40:47: INFO: IPsec-SA established[UDP encap 4500->4500]: ESP/Tunnel 83.243.93.200->78.28.223.10 with spi=259246202(0xf73c87a)
2010-08-18 12:40:47: INFO: IPsec-SA established[UDP encap 4500->4500]: ESP/Tunnel 78.28.223.10->83.243.93.200 with spi=3642234214(0xd9181566)
2010-08-18 12:43:27: INFO: IPsec-SA expired: ESP/Tunnel 83.243.93.200->78.28.223.10 with spi=33356156(0x1fcf97c)
2010-08-18 12:45:47: INFO: an undead schedule has been deleted: 'pk_recvupdate'.
2010-08-18 12:45:47: INFO: Purged IPsec-SA with proto_id=ESP and spi=3642234214(0xd9181566).
The most interesting thing is that sometimes this message appears, sometimes not (with the same configuration).
Please help!Hi,
I have some problem. I am using Windows 7 Entreprice x64. I use SA520 Firmware 1.1.65 and QuickVPN 1.4.1.2 port 60443.
"The remote gateway is not responding. Do you want to wait"
2010-08-18 17:25:51: INFO: Adding IPSec configuration with identifier "username"
2010-08-18 17:25:51: INFO: Adding IKE configuration with identifer "username"
2010-08-18 17:26:04: INFO: Configuration found for xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx[235].
2010-08-18 17:26:04: INFO: Received request for new phase 1 negotiation: 172.22.5.10[500]<=>xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx[235]
2010-08-18 17:26:04: INFO: Beginning Identity Protection mode.
2010-08-18 17:26:04: INFO: Received Vendor ID: MS NT5 ISAKMPOAKLEY
2010-08-18 17:26:04: INFO: Received Vendor ID: RFC 3947
2010-08-18 17:26:04: INFO: Received Vendor ID: draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-02
2010-08-18 17:26:04: INFO: Received unknown Vendor ID
2010-08-18 17:26:04: INFO: Received unknown Vendor ID
2010-08-18 17:26:04: INFO: Received unknown Vendor ID
2010-08-18 17:26:04: INFO: Received unknown Vendor ID
2010-08-18 17:26:04: INFO: For xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx[235], Selected NAT-T version: RFC 3947
2010-08-18 17:26:04: INFO: NAT-D payload does not match for 172.22.5.10[500]
2010-08-18 17:26:04: INFO: NAT-D payload does not match for xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx[235]
2010-08-18 17:26:04: INFO: NAT detected: ME PEER
2010-08-18 17:26:04: INFO: Floating ports for NAT-T with peer xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx[48540]
2010-08-18 17:26:04: INFO: ISAKMP-SA established for 172.22.5.10[4500]- xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx[48540] with spi:ed4f291c71c1b688:7e6a8a0968f878fb
2010-08-18 17:26:04: INFO: Sending Informational Exchange: notify payload[INITIAL-CONTACT]
2010-08-18 17:26:04: INFO: Responding to new phase 2 negotiation: 172.22.5.10[0]<=> xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx[0]
2010-08-18 17:26:04: INFO: Using IPsec SA configuration: 192.168.75.0/24<->192.168.170.224/32
2010-08-18 17:26:04: INFO: Adjusting peer's encmode 3(3)->Tunnel(1)
2010-08-18 17:26:05: INFO: IPsec-SA established[UDP encap 48540->4500]: ESP/Tunnel xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx->172.22.5.10 with spi=239099274(0xe405d8a)
2010-08-18 17:26:05: INFO: IPsec-SA established[UDP encap 4500->48540]: ESP/Tunnel 172.22.5.10-> xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx with spi=3886848189(0xe7ac98bd)
2010-08-18 17:26:07: INFO: Configuration found for xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx[235].
2010-08-18 17:26:07: INFO: Received request for new phase 1 negotiation: 172.22.5.10[500]<=> xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx[235]
2010-08-18 17:26:07: INFO: Beginning Identity Protection mode.
2010-08-18 17:26:07: INFO: Received Vendor ID: MS NT5 ISAKMPOAKLEY
2010-08-18 17:26:07: INFO: Received Vendor ID: RFC 3947
2010-08-18 17:26:07: INFO: Received Vendor ID: draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-02
2010-08-18 17:26:07: INFO: Received unknown Vendor ID
2010-08-18 17:26:07: INFO: Received unknown Vendor ID
2010-08-18 17:26:07: INFO: Received unknown Vendor ID
2010-08-18 17:26:07: INFO: For xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx[235], Selected NAT-T version: RFC 3947
2010-08-18 17:26:07: INFO: NAT-D payload does not match for 172.22.5.10[500]
2010-08-18 17:26:07: INFO: NAT-D payload does not match for xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx[235]
2010-08-18 17:26:07: INFO: NAT detected: ME PEER
2010-08-18 17:26:07: INFO: Floating ports for NAT-T with peer xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx[48540]
2010-08-18 17:26:07: INFO: ISAKMP-SA established for 172.22.5.10[4500]- xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx[48540] with spi:699f34b434d4318c:df4adca414787d36
2010-08-18 17:27:14: INFO: Purged ISAKMP-SA with proto_id=ISAKMP and spi=699f34b434d4318c:df4adca414787d36.
2010-08-18 17:27:14: INFO: Configuration found for xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx[235].
2010-08-18 17:27:14: INFO: Received request for new phase 1 negotiation: 172.22.5.10[500]<=> xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx[235]
2010-08-18 17:27:14: INFO: Beginning Identity Protection mode.
2010-08-18 17:27:14: INFO: Received Vendor ID: MS NT5 ISAKMPOAKLEY
2010-08-18 17:27:14: INFO: Received Vendor ID: RFC 3947
2010-08-18 17:27:14: INFO: Received Vendor ID: draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-02
2010-08-18 17:27:14: INFO: Received unknown Vendor ID
2010-08-18 17:27:14: INFO: Received unknown Vendor ID
2010-08-18 17:27:14: INFO: Received unknown Vendor ID
2010-08-18 17:27:14: INFO: For xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx[235], Selected NAT-T version: RFC 3947
2010-08-18 17:27:14: INFO: NAT-D payload does not match for 172.22.5.10[500]
2010-08-18 17:27:14: INFO: NAT-D payload does not match for xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx[235]
2010-08-18 17:27:14: INFO: NAT detected: ME PEER
2010-08-18 17:27:15: INFO: ISAKMP-SA deleted for 172.22.5.10[4500]- xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx[48540] with spi:699f34b434d4318c:df4adca414787d36
2010-08-18 17:27:15: INFO: Floating ports for NAT-T with peer xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx[48540]
2010-08-18 17:27:15: INFO: ISAKMP-SA established for 172.22.5.10[4500]- xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx[48540] with spi:3fe5eb0bddbf2b9a:f5c11d7f813ca74a
2010-08-18 17:27:15: INFO: Sending Informational Exchange: notify payload[INITIAL-CONTACT]
2010-08-18 17:28:20: INFO: Purged ISAKMP-SA with proto_id=ISAKMP and spi=3fe5eb0bddbf2b9a:f5c11d7f813ca74a.
2010-08-18 17:28:21: INFO: ISAKMP-SA deleted for 172.22.5.10[4500]- xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx[48540] with spi:3fe5eb0bddbf2b9a:f5c11d7f813ca74a
With windows XP Pro i dont have this problem.
Is there a detailed configuration guide?
10x -
I encountered a problem with some client machines that use Firefox version 24ESR and IE8.
Ajax requests of aspx pages from Firefox are getting the following error from the iis server (iis version 7.5):
Bad Request - Request Too Long
HTTP Error 400. The size of the request headers is too long.
From analyzing the request that was sent to the server, I saw that the request consist of only the viewstate of the aspx page.
I tried to disable the viewstate for one page and the server got the request correctly.
I do not encounter any issues on these laptops with postback requests from Firefox or when running the same application with IE8.Sometimes that means that the page address sent is loo long.
Check the link address you are using.
I can't help you further and will send for more help. -
HT1473 Do iMacs (2009) have a problem with copy protected CDs?
Do iMac (2009) have a problem with copy protected CDs? My iMac keeps ejecting new (2014) George Harrison (Apple years) CDs I bought.
Sorry, I should have been clearer. My iMac is not recognising the 2014 pressing of George Harrison's apple year CDs, I can't get them to play (let alone try & copy them). The CD is accepted in the drive, it reads the CD & then ejects it. I suspect that the CDs are copy protected, although I do have earlier (e.g. from 2004) copy controlled CDs that the iMac will play. Is there a known issue with iMacs not playing copy protected CDs?
My copy protection suspicion is based on a user posting on the George Harrison website, there is nothing on the CDs that state they are copy protected.
NB CDs play ok on CD players & also on a windows laptop. -
Does iOS8.1.1 resolve problems with copy&past?
since previous releases of iOS8 I'm facing problems with copy&paste of url's and data betwen application on iPad2 and 4s .
does 8.1.1 solve those problems.Paulus_2 wrote:
does 8.1.1 solve those problems.
There re are some who have reported it has, and then there are others who have reported it hasn't.
You might want to follow this methodology to update ...
Follow this procedure for a Troubleshooting Methodology ... basically reset to factory default condition -BUT- be sure to do the following methodically and also to follow the part with Apple Support!
First you want to make sure you have several backups of your data and done with a couple of "different" sources. Be sure to understand what data is backed up and what is NOT on iCloud Backup and iTunes Backup. Use a variety of methods for backup ... you might check into Dropbox, in addition to your Apple options.
Then turn off your desktop anti-virus software when using iTunes for this reset to factory default. After you do that reset, then leave your iPad in its factory default state and see how it operates then. If you encounter any problems in that factory default state, then take it to Apple Support, and let them know that you have just reset it to that state with iTunes and have not put any of your data back on and it is operating in this fashion (whatever the problem is) in that pristine state. Make sure you keep that trouble ticket number, because if it has to be escalated through Apple Support, you're going to find all communications tied in with that number. If the lower level help isn't able to help you, then escalate it to a higher level to examine the problem. Keep at it with that trouble ticket number until Apple Support arrives at a solution to that problem. Be methodical and keep at it.
On the other hand, if everything is okay with the factory default condition, then restore your backup. Some people have discovered that the problem resides in the apps or something in the restored backup. If that's the case, then it's going to be trying and difficult to find out which developer's app is causing you the problem. And ... it's true ... that a developer not following Apple's instructions and guidelines for his app can CAUSE YOU TROUBLE. This kind of thing does happen from developers, especially when a new system upgrade comes out, because some developers ignore what Apple tells them about changes coming, and what they do BREAKS SOMETHING.
This is a troubleshooting methodology that you are going through. See it through to the end.
Choosing an iOS Backup Method (Should I Use iTunes or iCloud to back up ...)
https://support.apple.com/kb/HT5262
Back up and Restore your iOS Device with iCloud or iTunes
http://support.apple.com/kb/ht1766
iTunes: About iOS Backups
http://support.apple.com/kb/ht4946
Create and Delete iPhone, iPad and iPod Touch Backups in iTunes
http://support.apple.com/kb/ht4946
iOS: Troubleshooting Encrypted Backups
http://support.apple.com/kb/TS5162
Use iTunes to Restore your iOS Device to Factory Settings
http://support.apple.com/kb/ht1414 -
Mail: Problem with copy&paste from Remote Session
Hi,
I have a problem to copy just text from remote session (MS RDP Client) directly into an email. It always shows a contact .
The workaround is to paste into any other app, it doesn't matter which one. It works with Outlook for Mac but not with Mail. Does someone have the same issue and maybe a solution?
Due to connection issues I cannot use Outlook outside the company... so not an alternative at the moment.
ThanksHi,
I test the issue with my colleague and didn't find the same issue.
Here is the screenshot:
So please check if Lync Server 2013 and all the issued Lync 2013 client update to the latest version firstly, it not update to the latest version, update it and then test again.
Best Regards,
Eason Huang
Eason Huang
TechNet Community Support -
Lync 2013 and problem with copy/paste from SQL Mgmt Studio.
Hi Everyone,
Recently one of ours programmers noticed a very interesting issue which is a real pain in the a## for him and his colleagues. It was all fine with Lync client 2010, problem started when moved some people to 2013 client.
When someone sends him a message with SQL Code, and he is pasting it into SQL mgmt std. he gets dashes "-" instead of spaces " ".
I thought this is a local PC issue, but:
1. On 2010 it worked, stopped all of a sudden when they changed lync client to 2013
2. They are pasting code on the SERVER not local SQL mgmt std. on their client machines
3. Even if I send him a code from Lync 2010 and he is pasting that from his 2013 client - he gets "-" dashes, so I guess it is not important from where I send the message, but from where he is copying it.
As for now, I have noticed that problem with guys from England and region of APAC - they have lync 2013 client already.
Really appreciate any help as I donot have any point where to start troubleshooting...
Cheers guys,Hi,
I test the issue with my colleague and didn't find the same issue.
Here is the screenshot:
So please check if Lync Server 2013 and all the issued Lync 2013 client update to the latest version firstly, it not update to the latest version, update it and then test again.
Best Regards,
Eason Huang
Eason Huang
TechNet Community Support -
DHCP problem with wireless clients
I've just set up this eqipment
Router/Firewall ASA 5505
Cisco WLC 2125 - Wlan controller
Switch Catalyst 2960
16 Ap's AIR-LAP1131AG-E-K9
Everything was working fine, but after a while there was a problem, spesially with cell phones with wlan and with some laptops. It seems a part of the users that has been connected, then loggout out and try to log in again. It seems that they then dont get dhcp. Can this be a problem with dhcp on the asa 5505? Or does anyone know of any settings that create problems of this type.
TrondOne layman's question:
For DHCP to work, you already permit 0.0.0.0 to ask 255.255.255.255 for its IP adress (i.e port 67 in one end, and 68 in the other).
When a client re-attaches ("logs in again") it will try to use its old adress (the one assigned by dhcp) and ask 255.255.255.255 to renew its adress.
Does your ACLs permit the IP range assigned via DHCP to access 255.255.255.255?
//Svein -
Problem with VPN Client passthrough on ASA 5505
I am having a problem with passing through a VPN client connection on an ASA 5505. The ASA is running version 8 and terminates an anyconnect VPN. The ASA is using PAT. When the inside user connects with the VPN client, it connects but no traffic passes through the tunnel. I see the error
305006 regular translation creation failed for protocol 50 src INSIDE:y.y.y.y dst OUTSIDE:x.x.x.x
UDP 500,4500 and ESP are allowed into the ASA. Ipsec inspection has also been setup on a global policy, but the user still cannot pass traffice to the remote VPN he is connected through.
At the Main Office we have an ASA 5510 that terminates a site to site VPN, allows remote connections with PAT and allows passthrough no problems. Any ideas?I am having a simuliar issue with my ASA 5505 that I have set up. I am trying to VPN into the Office. I have no problem accessing the Office network when I am on the internet without the ASA 5505. After I installed the 5505, and there is internet access, I try to connect to the Office network without success. The VPN connects with the following error.
3 Dec 31 2007 05:30:00 305006 xxx.xx.114.97
regular translation creation failed for protocol 50 src inside:192.168.1.9 dst outside:xxx.xx.114.97
HELP? -
Problem with Macintosh client on 10.5.6
I am having a problem with applying color lables and I was wondering if anybody else was. My server was upgraded to 10.5.6 and ever since then, when on a Macintosh client, applying a color label will not work as expected. I can label a file a color and it shows, but when I click off the file, it changes back to the previous color {or no label if it previously didn't have a label}. If I click on the file again, then the label seems to stick, but even this isn't consistent. It seems that the label does look correct when I look on the server itself. We use the labels quite a lot in my workgroup as a simple way to organize works in progress. Can anybody replicate this on their system? Also, this happens on both clients running 10.5.5 and 10.5.6 (and even 10.5.3 I think)
thanks,
sean rossYes, this appears to be a bug introduced with whatever modifications Apple made to AFP in 10.5.6. See this thread for more info, but no solution yet: http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=8776293
Message was edited by: JJakucyk -
New WSUS on Server 2012 - problem with win8 clients
Hi,
Two weeks ago we created a new Server 2012 and installed the WSUS role from scratch on it. Its version number is: 6.2.9200.16384. It replaced a Server 2008 WSUS server. After some time all the win7 clients updated and reported as
they did on the old and replaced server.
However all our win8 clients refuse to update against this server. They show correctly up in WSUS server console each with 107 needed updates day after day. We have rebooted them and done numerous wuauclt /resetauthorization /detectnow and wuauclt
/detectnow /reportnow, but to no avail.
I paste in some lines from a win8 client winupdate log at the end of this message if someone can figure out what I have to do to get these clients update as they did against the old wsus server. Thanks for help on this issue.
regards Tor
2014-02-03 08:33:38:008 920 153c Agent *************
2014-02-03 08:33:38:008 920 153c Agent ** START ** Agent: Finding updates [CallerId = Windows Update Command Line]
2014-02-03 08:33:38:008 920 153c Agent *********
2014-02-03 08:33:38:008 920 153c Agent * Online = Yes; Ignore download priority = No
2014-02-03 08:33:38:008 920 153c Agent * Criteria = "IsInstalled=0 and DeploymentAction='Installation' or IsPresent=1 and DeploymentAction='Uninstallation'
or IsInstalled=1 and DeploymentAction='Installation' and RebootRequired=1 or IsInstalled=0 and DeploymentAction='Uninstallation' and RebootRequired=1"
2014-02-03 08:33:38:008 920 153c Agent * ServiceID = {117CAB2D-82B1-4B5A-A08C-4D62DBEE7782} Third party service
2014-02-03 08:33:38:008 920 153c Agent * Search Scope = {Machine & All Users}
2014-02-03 08:33:38:008 920 153c Agent * Caller SID for Applicability: S-1-5-18
2014-02-03 08:33:38:008 920 153c Misc Validating signature for C:\Windows\SoftwareDistribution\WuRedir\9482F4B4-E343-43B6-B170-9A65BC822C77\wuredir.cab:
2014-02-03 08:33:38:008 920 1990 AU >>## RESUMED ## AU: Search for updates [CallId = {ABC7E77F-635F-4192-9B92-CBF9B1CB8AB0} ServiceId = {3DA21691-E39D-4DA6-8A4B-B43877BCB1B7}]
2014-02-03 08:33:38:008 920 1990 AU # 0 updates detected
2014-02-03 08:33:38:008 920 1990 AU #########
2014-02-03 08:33:38:008 920 1990 AU ## END ## AU: Search for updates [CallId = {ABC7E77F-635F-4192-9B92-CBF9B1CB8AB0} ServiceId = {3DA21691-E39D-4DA6-8A4B-B43877BCB1B7}]
2014-02-03 08:33:38:008 920 1990 AU #############
2014-02-03 08:33:38:023 920 153c Misc Microsoft signed: Yes
2014-02-03 08:33:38:023 920 153c Misc Infrastructure signed: Yes
2014-02-03 08:33:38:023 920 153c EP Got 9482F4B4-E343-43B6-B170-9A65BC822C77 redir SecondaryServiceAuth URL: "http://fe1.ws.microsoft.com/w8/2/redir/storeauth.cab"
2014-02-03 08:33:38:023 920 153c Misc Validating signature for C:\Windows\SoftwareDistribution\WuRedir\117CAB2D-82B1-4B5A-A08C-4D62DBEE7782\wuredir.cab:
2014-02-03 08:33:38:039 920 153c Misc Microsoft signed: Yes
2014-02-03 08:33:38:039 920 153c Misc Infrastructure signed: Yes
2014-02-03 08:33:38:039 920 153c EP Got 117CAB2D-82B1-4B5A-A08C-4D62DBEE7782 redir Client/Server URL: "https://fe2.ws.microsoft.com/v6/ClientWebService/client.asmx"
2014-02-03 08:33:38:055 920 153c PT +++++++++++ PT: Synchronizing server updates +++++++++++
2014-02-03 08:33:38:055 920 153c PT + ServiceId = {117CAB2D-82B1-4B5A-A08C-4D62DBEE7782}, Server URL = https://fe2.ws.microsoft.com/v6/ClientWebService/client.asmx
2014-02-03 08:33:38:055 920 153c Agent Reading cached app categories using lifetime 604800 seconds
2014-02-03 08:33:38:055 920 153c Agent Read 0 cached app categories
2014-02-03 08:33:39:211 920 153c Agent * Added update {E7FF661C-6A03-4387-A1EE-1D723B52EF60}.3 to search result
2014-02-03 08:33:39:211 920 153c Agent * Added update {E8B477DF-479E-4BCA-B8F8-2D987A509009}.2 to search result
2014-02-03 08:33:39:211 920 153c Agent * Added update {BB85CCA0-88DC-4DA7-8E81-B7F7E5E73B81}.100 to search result
2014-02-03 08:33:39:211 920 153c Agent * Added update {18DEF1D9-4513-467E-9D7E-E1772855BB9E}.100 to search result
2014-02-03 08:33:39:211 920 153c Agent * Added update {971D9BE4-5145-4DB5-962C-CEE2EE3A2842}.3 to search result
2014-02-03 08:33:39:211 920 153c Agent * Added update {CCB380C9-29F5-4305-96DD-86DE2D00438B}.2 to search result
2014-02-03 08:33:39:211 920 153c Agent * Added update {455BDD67-9ED0-4DE7-94F1-3480EA942414}.12 to search result
2014-02-03 08:33:39:211 920 153c Agent * Added update {ADFBFCE0-FFD4-4826-B9CF-50AE8182E3C5}.2 to search result
2014-02-03 08:33:39:211 920 153c Agent * Added update {BFA8C8B8-EEF7-4A82-A36C-8F760F792430}.3 to search result
2014-02-03 08:33:39:211 920 153c Agent * Added update {3F05DE38-92BC-44B6-B06B-5217E5CF12CA}.1 to search result
2014-02-03 08:33:39:211 920 153c Agent * Added update {A9A0E183-0667-46D6-84E4-17CEBCEE5A22}.1 to search result
2014-02-03 08:33:39:211 920 153c Agent * Added update {36BEF0D5-80ED-4942-8457-6F9C88546E06}.1 to search result
2014-02-03 08:33:39:211 920 153c Agent * Added update {A292CD86-AB4E-4388-8C7B-CFB392EDE6AC}.1 to search result
2014-02-03 08:33:39:211 920 153c Agent * Found 13 updates and 31 categories in search; evaluated appl. rules of 69 out of 94 deployed entities
2014-02-03 08:33:39:211 920 153c Agent *********
2014-02-03 08:33:39:211 920 153c Agent ** END ** Agent: Finding updates [CallerId = Windows Update Command Line]
2014-02-03 08:33:39:211 920 153c Agent *************
2014-02-03 08:33:39:211 920 1a64 Report REPORT EVENT: {0786C161-F6DC-4842-85D6-9506124654AD} 2014-02-03 08:33:38:008+0100 1
147 [AGENT_DETECTION_FINISHED] 101 {00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000} 0 0 Windows Update Command Line Success Software Synchronization
Windows Update Client successfully detected 0 updates.
2014-02-03 08:33:39:211 920 1a64 Report REPORT EVENT: {1E5D9728-220F-44A3-8BCC-ADE69687531D} 2014-02-03 08:33:38:008+0100 1
156 [AGENT_STATUS_30] 101 {00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000} 0 0 Windows Update Command Line Success Pre-Deployment Check
Reporting client status.
2014-02-03 08:33:39:211 920 1a64 Report REPORT EVENT: {57BAB7D0-685B-4D73-BDF7-82AFCE8675B0} 2014-02-03 08:33:39:211+0100 1
147 [AGENT_DETECTION_FINISHED] 101 {00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000} 0 0 Windows Update Command Line Success Software Synchronization
Windows Update Client successfully detected 13 updates.
2014-02-03 08:33:39:211 920 1a64 Report CWERReporter finishing event handling. (00000000)
2014-02-03 08:33:39:227 920 153c Agent *************
2014-02-03 08:33:39:227 920 153c Agent ** START ** Agent: Finding updates [CallerId = Windows Update Command Line]
2014-02-03 08:33:39:227 920 153c Agent *********
2014-02-03 08:33:39:227 920 153c Agent * Online = No; Ignore download priority = No
2014-02-03 08:33:39:227 920 153c Agent * Criteria = "IsInstalled=0 and DeploymentAction='Installation' or IsPresent=1 and DeploymentAction='Uninstallation'
or IsInstalled=1 and DeploymentAction='Installation' and RebootRequired=1 or IsInstalled=0 and DeploymentAction='Uninstallation' and RebootRequired=1"
2014-02-03 08:33:39:227 920 153c Agent * ServiceID = {117CAB2D-82B1-4B5A-A08C-4D62DBEE7782} Third party service
2014-02-03 08:33:39:227 920 153c Agent * Search Scope = {Current User}
2014-02-03 08:33:39:227 920 153c Agent * Caller SID for Applicability: S-1-5-21-4260610346-2664610402-3334891387-1155
2014-02-03 08:33:39:258 920 153c Agent * Added update {E8B477DF-479E-4BCA-B8F8-2D987A509009}.2 to search result
2014-02-03 08:33:39:258 920 153c Agent * Added update {BB85CCA0-88DC-4DA7-8E81-B7F7E5E73B81}.100 to search result
2014-02-03 08:33:39:258 920 153c Agent * Added update {18DEF1D9-4513-467E-9D7E-E1772855BB9E}.100 to search result
2014-02-03 08:33:39:258 920 153c Agent * Added update {971D9BE4-5145-4DB5-962C-CEE2EE3A2842}.3 to search result
2014-02-03 08:33:39:258 920 153c Agent * Added update {CCB380C9-29F5-4305-96DD-86DE2D00438B}.2 to search result
2014-02-03 08:33:39:258 920 153c Agent * Added update {455BDD67-9ED0-4DE7-94F1-3480EA942414}.12 to search result
2014-02-03 08:33:39:258 920 153c Agent * Added update {ADFBFCE0-FFD4-4826-B9CF-50AE8182E3C5}.2 to search result
2014-02-03 08:33:39:258 920 153c Agent * Added update {3F05DE38-92BC-44B6-B06B-5217E5CF12CA}.1 to search result
2014-02-03 08:33:39:258 920 153c Agent * Added update {A9A0E183-0667-46D6-84E4-17CEBCEE5A22}.1 to search result
2014-02-03 08:33:39:258 920 153c Agent * Added update {36BEF0D5-80ED-4942-8457-6F9C88546E06}.1 to search result
2014-02-03 08:33:39:258 920 153c Agent * Added update {A292CD86-AB4E-4388-8C7B-CFB392EDE6AC}.1 to search result
2014-02-03 08:33:39:258 920 153c Agent * Found 11 updates and 29 categories in search; evaluated appl. rules of 58 out of 94 deployed entities
2014-02-03 08:33:39:258 920 153c Agent *********
2014-02-03 08:33:39:258 920 153c Agent ** END ** Agent: Finding updates [CallerId = Windows Update Command Line]
2014-02-03 08:33:39:258 920 153c Agent *************
2014-02-03 08:33:39:258 920 153c Agent *************
2014-02-03 08:33:39:258 920 153c Agent ** START ** Agent: Finding updates [CallerId = Windows Update Command Line]
2014-02-03 08:33:39:258 920 153c Agent *********
2014-02-03 08:33:39:258 920 153c Agent * Online = No; Ignore download priority = No
2014-02-03 08:33:39:258 920 153c Agent * Criteria = "IsInstalled=0 and DeploymentAction='Installation' or IsPresent=1 and DeploymentAction='Uninstallation'
or IsInstalled=1 and DeploymentAction='Installation' and RebootRequired=1 or IsInstalled=0 and DeploymentAction='Uninstallation' and RebootRequired=1"
2014-02-03 08:33:39:258 920 153c Agent * ServiceID = {117CAB2D-82B1-4B5A-A08C-4D62DBEE7782} Third party service
2014-02-03 08:33:39:258 920 153c Agent * Search Scope = {Current User}
2014-02-03 08:33:39:258 920 153c Agent * Caller SID for Applicability: S-1-5-21-2212025170-3189117132-1219651784-500
2014-02-03 08:33:39:305 920 153c Agent * Added update {E8B477DF-479E-4BCA-B8F8-2D987A509009}.2 to search result
2014-02-03 08:33:39:305 920 153c Agent * Added update {BB85CCA0-88DC-4DA7-8E81-B7F7E5E73B81}.100 to search result
2014-02-03 08:33:39:305 920 153c Agent * Added update {18DEF1D9-4513-467E-9D7E-E1772855BB9E}.100 to search result
2014-02-03 08:33:39:305 920 153c Agent * Added update {971D9BE4-5145-4DB5-962C-CEE2EE3A2842}.3 to search result
2014-02-03 08:33:39:305 920 153c Agent * Added update {CCB380C9-29F5-4305-96DD-86DE2D00438B}.2 to search result
2014-02-03 08:33:39:305 920 153c Agent * Added update {455BDD67-9ED0-4DE7-94F1-3480EA942414}.12 to search result
2014-02-03 08:33:39:305 920 153c Agent * Added update {ADFBFCE0-FFD4-4826-B9CF-50AE8182E3C5}.2 to search result
2014-02-03 08:33:39:305 920 153c Agent * Added update {BFA8C8B8-EEF7-4A82-A36C-8F760F792430}.3 to search result
2014-02-03 08:33:39:305 920 153c Agent * Added update {3F05DE38-92BC-44B6-B06B-5217E5CF12CA}.1 to search result
2014-02-03 08:33:39:305 920 153c Agent * Added update {36BEF0D5-80ED-4942-8457-6F9C88546E06}.1 to search result
2014-02-03 08:33:39:305 920 153c Agent * Added update {A292CD86-AB4E-4388-8C7B-CFB392EDE6AC}.1 to search result
2014-02-03 08:33:39:305 920 153c Agent * Found 11 updates and 30 categories in search; evaluated appl. rules of 60 out of 94 deployed entities
2014-02-03 08:33:39:305 920 153c Agent *********
2014-02-03 08:33:39:305 920 153c Agent ** END ** Agent: Finding updates [CallerId = Windows Update Command Line]
2014-02-03 08:33:39:305 920 153c Agent *************
2014-02-03 08:33:39:305 920 153c Agent *************
2014-02-03 08:33:39:305 920 153c Agent ** START ** Agent: Finding updates [CallerId = Windows Update Command Line]
2014-02-03 08:33:39:305 920 153c Agent *********
2014-02-03 08:33:39:305 920 153c Agent * Online = No; Ignore download priority = No
2014-02-03 08:33:39:305 920 153c Agent * Criteria = "IsInstalled=0 and DeploymentAction='Installation' or IsPresent=1 and DeploymentAction='Uninstallation'
or IsInstalled=1 and DeploymentAction='Installation' and RebootRequired=1 or IsInstalled=0 and DeploymentAction='Uninstallation' and RebootRequired=1"
2014-02-03 08:33:39:305 920 153c Agent * ServiceID = {117CAB2D-82B1-4B5A-A08C-4D62DBEE7782} Third party service
2014-02-03 08:33:39:305 920 153c Agent * Search Scope = {Current User}
2014-02-03 08:33:39:305 920 153c Agent * Caller SID for Applicability: S-1-5-21-4260610346-2664610402-3334891387-1323
2014-02-03 08:33:39:352 920 153c Agent * Added update {E8B477DF-479E-4BCA-B8F8-2D987A509009}.2 to search result
2014-02-03 08:33:39:352 920 153c Agent * Added update {BB85CCA0-88DC-4DA7-8E81-B7F7E5E73B81}.100 to search result
2014-02-03 08:33:39:352 920 153c Agent * Added update {18DEF1D9-4513-467E-9D7E-E1772855BB9E}.100 to search result
2014-02-03 08:33:39:352 920 153c Agent * Added update {971D9BE4-5145-4DB5-962C-CEE2EE3A2842}.3 to search result
2014-02-03 08:33:39:352 920 153c Agent * Added update {CCB380C9-29F5-4305-96DD-86DE2D00438B}.2 to search result
2014-02-03 08:33:39:352 920 153c Agent * Added update {455BDD67-9ED0-4DE7-94F1-3480EA942414}.12 to search result
2014-02-03 08:33:39:352 920 153c Agent * Added update {ADFBFCE0-FFD4-4826-B9CF-50AE8182E3C5}.2 to search result
2014-02-03 08:33:39:352 920 153c Agent * Added update {BFA8C8B8-EEF7-4A82-A36C-8F760F792430}.3 to search result
2014-02-03 08:33:39:352 920 153c Agent * Added update {3F05DE38-92BC-44B6-B06B-5217E5CF12CA}.1 to search result
2014-02-03 08:33:39:352 920 153c Agent * Added update {36BEF0D5-80ED-4942-8457-6F9C88546E06}.1 to search result
2014-02-03 08:33:39:352 920 153c Agent * Added update {A292CD86-AB4E-4388-8C7B-CFB392EDE6AC}.1 to search result
2014-02-03 08:33:39:352 920 153c Agent * Found 11 updates and 30 categories in search; evaluated appl. rules of 60 out of 94 deployed entities
2014-02-03 08:33:39:352 920 153c Agent *********
2014-02-03 08:33:39:352 920 153c Agent ** END ** Agent: Finding updates [CallerId = Windows Update Command Line]
2014-02-03 08:33:39:352 920 153c Agent *************
2014-02-03 08:33:39:352 920 153c Agent *************
2014-02-03 08:33:39:352 920 153c Agent ** START ** Agent: Finding updates [CallerId = Windows Update Command Line]
2014-02-03 08:33:39:352 920 153c Agent *********
2014-02-03 08:33:39:352 920 153c Agent * Online = No; Ignore download priority = No
2014-02-03 08:33:39:352 920 153c Agent * Criteria = "IsInstalled=0 and DeploymentAction='Installation' or IsPresent=1 and DeploymentAction='Uninstallation'
or IsInstalled=1 and DeploymentAction='Installation' and RebootRequired=1 or IsInstalled=0 and DeploymentAction='Uninstallation' and RebootRequired=1"
2014-02-03 08:33:39:352 920 153c Agent * ServiceID = {117CAB2D-82B1-4B5A-A08C-4D62DBEE7782} Third party service
2014-02-03 08:33:39:352 920 153c Agent * Search Scope = {Current User}
2014-02-03 08:33:39:352 920 153c Agent * Caller SID for Applicability: S-1-5-21-4260610346-2664610402-3334891387-1282
2014-02-03 08:33:39:383 920 153c Agent * Added update {E8B477DF-479E-4BCA-B8F8-2D987A509009}.2 to search result
2014-02-03 08:33:39:383 920 153c Agent * Added update {BB85CCA0-88DC-4DA7-8E81-B7F7E5E73B81}.100 to search result
2014-02-03 08:33:39:383 920 153c Agent * Added update {18DEF1D9-4513-467E-9D7E-E1772855BB9E}.100 to search result
2014-02-03 08:33:39:383 920 153c Agent * Added update {971D9BE4-5145-4DB5-962C-CEE2EE3A2842}.3 to search result
2014-02-03 08:33:39:383 920 153c Agent * Added update {CCB380C9-29F5-4305-96DD-86DE2D00438B}.2 to search result
2014-02-03 08:33:39:383 920 153c Agent * Added update {455BDD67-9ED0-4DE7-94F1-3480EA942414}.12 to search result
2014-02-03 08:33:39:383 920 153c Agent * Added update {ADFBFCE0-FFD4-4826-B9CF-50AE8182E3C5}.2 to search result
2014-02-03 08:33:39:383 920 153c Agent * Added update {BFA8C8B8-EEF7-4A82-A36C-8F760F792430}.3 to search result
2014-02-03 08:33:39:383 920 153c Agent * Added update {3F05DE38-92BC-44B6-B06B-5217E5CF12CA}.1 to search result
2014-02-03 08:33:39:383 920 153c Agent * Added update {36BEF0D5-80ED-4942-8457-6F9C88546E06}.1 to search result
2014-02-03 08:33:39:383 920 153c Agent * Added update {A292CD86-AB4E-4388-8C7B-CFB392EDE6AC}.1 to search result
2014-02-03 08:33:39:383 920 153c Agent * Found 11 updates and 30 categories in search; evaluated appl. rules of 60 out of 94 deployed entities
2014-02-03 08:33:39:383 920 153c Agent *********
2014-02-03 08:33:39:383 920 153c Agent ** END ** Agent: Finding updates [CallerId = Windows Update Command Line]
2014-02-03 08:33:39:383 920 153c Agent *************
2014-02-03 08:33:39:383 920 1990 AU >>## RESUMED ## AU: Search for updates [CallId = {66AF0139-896D-4607-8660-B66D2B58EA26} ServiceId = {117CAB2D-82B1-4B5A-A08C-4D62DBEE7782}]
2014-02-03 08:33:39:383 920 1990 AU # 12 updates detected
2014-02-03 08:33:39:383 920 1990 AU #########
2014-02-03 08:33:39:383 920 1990 AU ## END ## AU: Search for updates [CallId = {66AF0139-896D-4607-8660-B66D2B58EA26} ServiceId = {117CAB2D-82B1-4B5A-A08C-4D62DBEE7782}]
2014-02-03 08:33:39:383 920 1990 AU #############
2014-02-03 08:33:39:383 920 1990 AU All AU searches complete.
2014-02-03 08:33:39:383 920 1990 AU AU setting next detection timeout to 2014-02-03 10:18:51
2014-02-03 08:33:44:211 920 1a64 Report CWERReporter finishing event handling. (00000000)
2014-02-03 08:41:39:472 920 1a64 EP Got WSUS Client/Server URL: "http://elias:8530/ClientWebService/client.asmx"
2014-02-03 08:41:39:472 920 1a64 PT WARNING: Cached cookie has expired or new PID is available
2014-02-03 08:41:39:472 920 1a64 EP Got WSUS SimpleTargeting URL: "http://elias:8530"
2014-02-03 08:41:39:472 920 1a64 PT Initializing simple targeting cookie, clientId = c5e26849-287b-4b96-ba5d-1489d6fad2f2, target group = , DNS name = dt-ikt-tor.framnes.lan
2014-02-03 08:41:39:472 920 1a64 PT Server URL = http://elias:8530/SimpleAuthWebService/SimpleAuth.asmx
2014-02-03 08:41:39:519 920 1a64 EP Got WSUS Reporting URL: "http://elias:8530/ReportingWebService/ReportingWebService.asmx"
2014-02-03 08:41:39:519 920 1a64 Report Uploading 2 events using cached cookie, reporting URL = http://elias:8530/ReportingWebService/ReportingWebService.asmx
2014-02-03 08:41:39:566 920 1a64 Report Reporter successfully uploaded 2 events.
2014-02-03 08:42:13:212 920 178c Report WARNING: CSerializationHelper:: InitSerialize failed : 0x80070002
2014-02-03 08:43:40:450 920 178c AU ########### AU: Uninitializing Automatic Updates ###########
2014-02-03 08:43:40:450 920 178c WuTask Uninit WU Task Manager
2014-02-03 08:43:40:513 920 178c Service *********
2014-02-03 08:43:40:513 920 178c Service ** END ** Service: Service exit [Exit code = 0x240001]
2014-02-03 08:43:40:513 920 178c Service *************Today I opened Control Panel / Windows Updates and first did a check for new updates (from the WSUS server). Nothing was found and it reported Windows is Updated. Then I clicked the link Check for updates from Microsoft via internet, and
it found around 24 updates.
This is confirmation of the point that I made in the previous post. The updates are *NEEDED* by this system, but the updates were not *AVAILABLE* from the assigned WSUS Server. You were able to get them from Windows Update, but that does not fix your continuing
issue with the WSUS Server.
but it still reported the original 108 Needed updates.
Exactly. As previously noted, the client is functioning perfectly. The problem is NOT with the client; the problem is with the WSUS Server. The updates that this client needed were not AVAILABLE to be downloaded from the WSUS server.
Why this is the case requires further investigation on your part, but is either because the updates are not properly approved, or the update FILES are not yet downloaded from Microsoft to the WSUS server.
It appears that the wsus server doesn't get any information back from the client despite that it displays new Last contact and Last Status report timestamps.
This conclusion is incorrect. The WSUS Server got every bit of information available from the client -- you've confirmed this by the number of updates reported as "Needed" by the Windows Update Agent to the WSUS Server.
I assumed that the log would display if the updates were downloaded or not.
It will log when the updates are actually downloaded. If there's no log entries for updates being downloaded, then they're not being downloaded. If the logfile says "Found 0 updates", then that means exactly what it says: It couldn't find any approved/available
updates to download.
In your case it "Found 11 updates", but now it will be impossible to diagnose that fault, because you went and got them from Windows Update.
All Win8 versions are checked in the WSUS server's Product list so the updates should at least have been downloaded to the server.
This is why understanding the infrastructure is so critical. Your conclusion is invalid based on the premise given, and you may be using improper terminology which only confuses the rest of us as well.
First, selecting updates for synchronization only gets the update metadata (i.e. the detection logic) downloaded to the WSUS database.
The Second Step in this process is to Approve those updates for one or more WSUS Target Groups that contain the appropriate client systems. Following the approval of an update, the WSUS Server downloads the INSTALLATION FILE for that update.
Once the WUAgent sees an approved update and the installation file is available, then the WUAgent will download the file and schedule the update for installation.
Most of the post I read about my problem is about upgrading a 2008 WSUS server to support Win8 / Server 12 clients. When I try to run this update on my Server 12 WSUS it refuses to run (probably because it is for Server 2008).
Yeah.. totally different issue in those posts than what you're describing here.
What should I do to try to track down the problem?
Well.... now that it's 11 days since the logfile was posted, and you've already updated that system, we'll first need to find another system exhibiting the same issue.
Then I'll need to ask a number of questions to properly understand the environment, as well as what you have or have not done.
Then, from there, we can attempt to figure out why your Windows 8 client apparently sees some updates as approved/available but is still not downloading them. We do not yet have sufficient information to even speculate on a possible cause -- there are several.
Lawrence Garvin, M.S., MCSA, MCITP:EA, MCDBA
SolarWinds Head Geek
Microsoft MVP - Software Packaging, Deployment & Servicing (2005-2014)
My MVP Profile: http://mvp.microsoft.com/en-us/mvp/Lawrence%20R%20Garvin-32101
http://www.solarwinds.com/gotmicrosoft
The views expressed on this post are mine and do not necessarily reflect the views of SolarWinds.
Maybe you are looking for
-
I saw I had almost 30,000 txt messages on a Gmail account that I had created a gmail account for on Thunderbird. I didn't realize that they were going here from Gmail. I highlighted all of them and attempted to delete them. The spinning circle finall
-
MDX MAX operator resulting in 999/99999 querying on Dimension
The following MDX query for my dimension is returning values either 999/99999 depending on number of members in the dimension. WITH MEMBER [Measures].[MaxKey] AS MAX([Fare Media].[Fare Media Id].ALLMEMBERS , [Fare Media].[Fare Media Id].current
-
how do I connect my MBP to a Sony Bravia TV
-
Dear Experts, I have an issue with transactional RFC. There are many queues there (SM58) what should i do know? Should i execute LUW for each row? Thanks in advance. Rhesa
-
Not familiar with EJB, hope my question makes sense. What are the avail. options of calling, from PL/SQL, Java program (EJB) that resides on NON-ORACLE app server (JBoss) ? thanks ! 10gR2