Problem with cross-company cash concentration

I set up a cash concentration to transfer cash from Company A to Company B using the following steps:
1) Transactions FF73 Cash Concentration
2) FF.9 Post
3) FF.D Generate Payment Request from Paymnet Advice
When I tried to display the Payment Request using  transasction F8BT, there is no payment request in Company A. However the payment request is showing up in Company B!
I am unable to pay as F111 does not pick up the payment request.
Any know with experience with this issue?

Hi Mamta,
Thanks for the Response. I think you misunderstood my scenario.
For Eg in FB60 with Co code 5065:
I am debiting the Expenses for Co Code 1000(Witholding tax not active) and crediting the Bank Account of Co Code 5065(Withholding tax setup is done for this co code). When I tried to post with these line items I have getting the error.
Posting        GL                   Co Code
Dr          106520(Exp)            1000
Cr          202020(Bank)           5065
For this I tried by activating the Withholding tax for Co code 1000 which is not active before and post it. The system allows me to post the invoice.
I want to know whether is this a right way to solve this issue and will it impact on any other areas by only activating the Withholding tax for a Co code?
Thanks,
Bapu

Similar Messages

  • Issue with Cross-Company code transactions and Extended Withholding tax

    Hi Gurus,
    I am having an issue with Cross-company code transaction while posting expense with 2 different company codes.
    In the 2 company codes, one company code is setup for Withholding tax and other was not set.
    While posting in FB50, I am getting the below message and system does not allow to post the invoice.
    Company codes have different settings for withholding tax treatment
    Message no. F5786
    Diagnosis
    You are entering a document containing at least one vendor or customer item and which has line items in several company codes. The extended withholding tax treatment has been set to active in one of these company codes, but not in one of the other company codes.
    System Response
    You cannot enter this kind of document.
    Procedure
    Enter the transaction in two documents.
    For this I tried to test the transaction by activating of extended Withholding tax for both the company codes. Then the invoice is posting correctly now.
    The point is if I activate extended withholding tax for the Company code which is not using the setup, will it face any issues in other areas? and also kindly advice whether is this a right way to set up to fix the current problem.
    Thanks for the Support and early response will be appreciated.
    JBC.

    Hi Mamta,
    Thanks for the Response. I think you misunderstood my scenario.
    For Eg in FB60 with Co code 5065:
    I am debiting the Expenses for Co Code 1000(Witholding tax not active) and crediting the Bank Account of Co Code 5065(Withholding tax setup is done for this co code). When I tried to post with these line items I have getting the error.
    Posting        GL                   Co Code
    Dr          106520(Exp)            1000
    Cr          202020(Bank)           5065
    For this I tried by activating the Withholding tax for Co code 1000 which is not active before and post it. The system allows me to post the invoice.
    I want to know whether is this a right way to solve this issue and will it impact on any other areas by only activating the Withholding tax for a Co code?
    Thanks,
    Bapu

  • Cross - company cash application for Accounts recievables

    Kindly let me know how to conduct an cross company cash application. Which transaction will best accomplish this .
    I have set - up the cross - company clearing account between the 2 companies.
    Thanks in advance.

    If I am not wrong, your company code A receives payment from customer and you want to clear the customer open item in company code B.  If you have done the cross-company code clearing between these two company codes using T Code OBYA, then all you have to do is make the following posting in company code A.
    Dr. Cash/Bank $100 (in company code A)
    Cr. Customer $100 (in company code B)
    System will automatically generate the following postings.
    Dr. Cash/Bank $100 (in CoCd A)
    Cr. Clearing with CoCd B $100 (in CoCd A)
    Dr. Clearing with CoCd A $ 100 (in CoCd B)
    Cr. Customer $100 (in CoCd B)
    Clearing accounts are what you specify in OBYA.
    Assign pts. if this answers your question!

  • Problem with Cross tabs

    I have a problem with cross tab.
    When I do grouping on date according to month and summarize the units I am getting the result as 58
    while I do grouping without the croos tab generally in the details section I get the result to be 64.
    I am not able to understand where is the problem.
    Even when I write a query i get the answer as 64.

    Hi,
    Summarizing with a Cross-tab and creating a summary of a group are one and the same; I mean, the summary results are always the same.
    Could you check the summary operation in the crosstab, could you confirm if it is not count or something else?
    Also, create a summary and place it on the Group Header/Footer. It should be same as the Crosstab results for the that particular group.
    -Abhilash

  • HT201210 How to correct Problems with cross connections

    How to correct Problems with cross connections

    Nope not a wrg #, its been a call frm my mom, my son and my brothers that show on my ph, numbers that have been programmed in for years. Thanks  

  • Discover group problem with cross tab report

    Hi, I'm working on a cross tab report in discoverer 4i and I'm having a problem with two of the colums. I'm doing a count on one field but because they are called something different they are being shown as two seperate columns rather than 1.
    I have one called 101 -AVG and another called 101-AVG. My condition pulls every result back that starts with 101 in the table. So because in the table the values are different it breaks the count into totals for 101 -AVG and 101-AVG.
    Is there some way I can group these results together into one field?
    thanks,
    Ian

    Pitson,
    better to ask this question in the BI Publisher Forum than here in the Oracle Reports Forum:
    BI Publisher
    Regards
    Rainer

  • Intermittent problem with cross dissolve and chroma key

    It seems that in 1 out of 10 videos I produce in Final Cut Pro there is a problem with the cross dissolve effect and chroma key. What happens is that during the cross dissolve, clip A fades out with a green tint and clip B fades in with a green tint.
    Today I am working with two videos that I captured using the same work flow on the same day. One project exhibits the tint while the second project does not. If I import the problematic footage into the good project the tint problem follows the footage. In the good footage, the cross dissolve produces a result that does not have a green tint. If I re-capture the "bad" footage the results are the same.
    Has anyone else experienced this and does anyone have an idea how to resolve this problem?
    Thank you.
    Dual G5   Mac OS X (10.4.6)  

    In my project, both clips are source clips with Chroma, Color Smoothing and Matte Choker applied. A dissolve from non-chroma clip to chroma clip works fine. Only problem is with two chroma clips. In my dissolve, the error appears as red fringing in the area between the two masks.< </div>
    You're using creative shorthand that doesn't help. "Chroma clip" means the clip to which you have applied all of these effects? What masks? Where are you getting the masks?
    To understand what's going on with all them itty bitty pixels in a stack of interactive effects, do me a favor: render out a short piece, say 10 seconds of each of your chromaclips as separate movies over transparency using the Animation codec. Reimport them and put them over a solid colored Dissolve between them using different types of dissolves. Post back and tell us (me) what's going on.
    I still consider this to be a bug -- nesting adds more steps to the workflow than if this bug did not exist. < </div>
    It's not a bug. Your pixels are running down a pathway. It's a question of building the correct pathway and having the correct pixel wranglers with the right kinds of cattle prods.
    bogiesan

  • Problem with Cross-tab report (RTF Template) null values, current-group()

    Hi, experts!
    I generate Cross-tab report using RTF Tamlpate and I have problem with grouping.
    My XML file have to be with one group only because I want to using dynamic regrouping inside the RTF template.
    Here is my data structure (XML file):(Look the images for details)
    http://img156.imageshack.us/img156/3997/xmlstructureay9.jpg
    =======================
    WITH GROUPS
    =======================
    Here is my RTF template:
    http://img151.imageshack.us/img151/2951/resultcrosstabbycustomehf8.jpg
    When I'm using grouping and I want to have for each group cross-tab report I have the following problem: (Look the images for details)
    http://img156.imageshack.us/img156/8786/resultcrosstabbycustomect9.jpg
    And this is my code I'm using inside the RTF template with groups:(Look the images for details)
    http://img156.imageshack.us/img156/4253/fieldbrowserxb7.jpg
    +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
    =======================
    WITHOUT GROUPS
    =======================
    Here is my RTF template:
    http://img151.imageshack.us/img151/9545/resultcrosstabwithoutgrzg7.jpg
    When I generate one cross-tab there is no problem: (Look the images for details)
    http://img156.imageshack.us/img156/7030/resultcrosstabwithoutgrsr1.jpg
    This is my code I'm using inside the RTF template WITHOUT groups:(Look the images for details)
    http://img151.imageshack.us/img151/7030/fieldbrowserwithoutgrours8.jpg
    Can someone give me a hand to deal with this?
    Thank you!

    Pitson,
    better to ask this question in the BI Publisher Forum than here in the Oracle Reports Forum:
    BI Publisher
    Regards
    Rainer

  • Problem with Cross-tab report (RTF Template)

    Hi, experts!
    I generate Cross-tab report using RTF Tamlpate and I have problem with grouping.
    My XML file have to be with one group only because I want to using dynamic regrouping inside the RTF template.
    Here is my data structure (XML file):(Look the images for details)
    http://img156.imageshack.us/img156/3997/xmlstructureay9.jpg
    =======================
    WITH GROUPS
    =======================
    Here is my RTF template:
    http://img151.imageshack.us/img151/2951/resultcrosstabbycustomehf8.jpg
    When I'm using grouping and I want to have for each group cross-tab report I have the following problem: (Look the images for details)
    http://img156.imageshack.us/img156/8786/resultcrosstabbycustomect9.jpg
    And this is my code I'm using inside the RTF template with groups:(Look the images for details)
    http://img156.imageshack.us/img156/4253/fieldbrowserxb7.jpg
    +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
    =======================
    WITHOUT GROUPS
    =======================
    Here is my RTF template:
    http://img151.imageshack.us/img151/9545/resultcrosstabwithoutgrzg7.jpg
    When I generate one cross-tab there is no problem: (Look the images for details)
    http://img156.imageshack.us/img156/7030/resultcrosstabwithoutgrsr1.jpg
    This is my code I'm using inside the RTF template WITHOUT groups:(Look the images for details)
    http://img151.imageshack.us/img151/7030/fieldbrowserwithoutgrours8.jpg
    Can someone give me a hand to deal with this?
    Thank you!

    Pitson,
    better to ask this question in the BI Publisher Forum than here in the Oracle Reports Forum:
    BI Publisher
    Regards
    Rainer

  • Problem with cross

    hey there,
    i have a problem with a cross for two sequences.
    in a earlier cross the is the cross between the scenes. at my problem here the cross is only in the second part of those scenes.
    there is no possibility to put it between both scenes.
    i´ve looked ...there is no space between the scenes.
    how can i solve this problem ?
    thaks for help.

    It may be that the outgoing clip has no remaining frames after the out point..
    If, for example you want to produce a 12 frame dissolve equally across two clips, both the outgoing and incoming clips must have 6 frames of material available before their out/in points.
    If that is the case, shorten the clips by 6 frames and then place the dissolve.

  • Problem with Cross Dissolve: The video cuts out during the transistion

    I'm encountering a problem with the Cross Dissolve transistion wherein during the period in which the transition should be happening the video instead drops out.  There's plenty of heads and tails available on both clips, but as soon as the timeline hits the start of the transition "from' clip cuts out, revealing the background or black if there's no background underneath and then the "go-to" clip cuts in at the end of the transition.
    Any help would be appreciated.

    I've been having this issue and it's driving me crazy.  It's random, that some cross dissolves work, and others don't.  Seems to affect AVCHD footage.  Adobe seems to be aware of the issue.
    The work around that I've seen posted by a forum user "Mitch W" is to apply a GPU accelerated effect to one of the clips in the pair.  The effect can be turned to "0" so as not to alter the video.  The act of doing this, makes premiere see the clip differently, and render the cross dissolve correctly.
    Fast Blur, set to "zero", seems to do the trick, and allows it to work with CUDA acceleration turned on.  I did notice that the work around was broken by changing the playback resolution in the viewer window.  In that situation, I had to apply the GPU effect to the other clip in the pair to make it work again.
    I don't know what will happen if I change my playback resolution again...

  • Accounts receivables - Cross company cash application - Need help

    Hello,
      They are applying cash to an invoice to a diff  company- code . For e.g if there is an invocie in comp A ( cust debit and Rev :  credit ) but the cash account is of company B.
    These are the documents which it creates
    Original Invoice :
    COMPANY  A,
    Customer   debit  :                  100 dollars
    Revenue account  credit :         100 dollars.
    After CASH application:
    cross - company document created : 100000
    company A, customer credit  :    100 dollars
                       inter company   :     100 dollars
    company B  cash account debit  :           100 dollars
                       inter - comp account credit :   100 dollars.
    The thing is when I pull up the customer from company A , it still shows in open items list , but the fact is it is cleared in a diff company.
    What do I need to do to remove it from the open item list, or what is the correct procedure .
    Please let me know how to resolve this as it is affecting a custom Aging report.
    Thanks in advance.

    i am testing this , can u pls tell me how do i clear an invoice from a diff company code cash account.
    thanks.

  • Whats the Problem with this Company?

    Most Company's want to keep there Customers happy it seems I am disappointed in everything except the reception is good. I bought a Smart phone and if you go over your limit it cost to use it.. Man my bill is higher than the Twin Towers used to be... And still I have to pay if I go over a specific amount for sharing photo's what is this? yu say its unlimited everything then they change that and say something else it sounds to me like Greed has gone to Verizon's account with all of us.. I am ashamed this is happening to all of us.. I know people who can do anything without being charged with other company's why is it this one doesn't care about our Wallets and be so happy that they have customers that actually pay there bill each month and give us a break... Shame.. Verizon.. I do love you but don't like your plans.. They are not ethical. To us.. or For us.. You need to change your plans and stop changing everything each month to something else when Your told you have unlimited everything then that is what it should be.. Now you have gone to far...

    http://m.digitaltrends.com/opinion/opinion-its-a-trap-beware-carriers-new-unlimited-talk-and-text-plans/   This site is one of many that explains how the cash cows of "talk & texting" has declined.  And it mentions family usage as you are doing.  Personally I don't talk much on the phone, I don't text much or for that matter use a load of data. So I am basically overpaying for everything. But I like knowing I have it available if I need it.  I love taking photos of the places my wife and I travel to. I upload to Facebook every step of the trip, so our friends and family have the pictures. I use a photo upload to Walgreens to print them out in hard copy for our photo albums, I also burn them to cd/dvd so I just don't use talking that much. Those texts can add up however. I use around 600 to my friends. But only from me and not my wife.  The emergency phone also very rarely sends texts or makes calls so no big deal there. But my wife uses her phone for calls, and that Netflix, You Tube and TW Cable TV so she loves data. But ours is unlimited not tiered or metered. She is happy that is all that matters.

  • I like the new version of Firefox 4, but have slowest problem with the company bluecoat proxy. I have change different setting in the about:config. Any Ideas how to to fix the slowest.

    I like the new version of Firefox 4, But have slowing problem with the bluecoat proxy. I have change different setting in the about:config with no luck. Any ideas why it's moving so slow would help?
    network.automatic-ntlm-auth.trusted-uris = proxysg
    network.negotiate-auth.delegation-uris=proxysg
    network.negotiate-auth.trusted-uris=proxysg
    network.negotiate-auth.allow-proxies = True
    network.ntlm.send-lm-response = True
    network.automatic-ntlm-auth.allow-proxies=True

    You can also look at Tab Mix Plus.
    Tab Mix Plus: https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/addon/1122

  • Problem with Cross-domain SSO, NTLM and ITS to R/3

    Hello,
    We are using EP 6.0.13.0 on a Windows environment.  We have an ITS running WebGUI/ESS/MSS in another domain and that is the same domain where the R/3 and BI systems reside.  We have configured NTLM authentication using IIS web server 6.0 and the IISProxy 1.6.2.  We have configured SSO with the backends using the same ID as in the MS-ADS.  Almost everything works fine.
    The problem is that when we use the NTLM logon VIA the IIS to the portal, and then navigate to a WebGUI service transaction we are prompted for login.  When we refresh the portal screen and try again - it works.
    We have configured the mdc.hosts and are using the sendSAPSSO2Cookie.asp to generate the cross-domain logon ticket.
    I have read that ITS may require the PAS be set up but I thought that was only used when you are going directly to the ITS (leveraging the NTLM authentication) - not when you are going through the portal.
    Does anyone have some experience using ALL of the SSO features (i.e. SSO, cross-domain support, ITS, windows integrated authentication)?
    We have though about the relax option for the domain but it does not apply as our domains are:
    SERVER1.domain1.com and SERVER2.domain2.com
    ... so relaxing would not help unless we relaxed to the ".COM" which is unreasonable.
    My regards,
    Judson Maizels

    Hi JUDSON
    well i'll give one easy solution
    make a alias under host file reside in winnt\system32\drivers\etc directory which has same domain name
    i.e
    SERVER1.domain1.com   server1.mydomain.com
    SERVER2.domain2.com   server2.mydomain.com
    it's works in my schenario we have a same system landscape
    as you
    regards,
    kaushal

Maybe you are looking for