Problem with Delta IP on 0TCT_DS23 in Production system

Hi all,
I'm encountering a quite tricky problem: I'm currently working on the 0TCT_DS23 Datasource, with the technical content cube.
I can run an init infopackage on our 3 environments, Dev, Quality and production. Same for full packages. But when I try to run a delta IP, it is failing on the production system, with a dump of the extractor.
Looking at ST22, it's saying that there is
a syntax error in program "/BI0/SAPLQI0TCT_DS23 ".
Causes
    Error in the ABAP Application Program
    The current ABAP program "SAPMSSY1" had to be terminated because it has
    come across a statement that unfortunately cannot be executed.
    The following syntax error occurred in program "/BI0/SAPLQI0TCT_DS23 " in
     include "/BI0/LQI0TCT_DS23$02 " in
    line 7:
    "A FUNCTION already exists with the name "/BI0/QI0TCT_DS23"."
    The include has been created and last changed by:
    Created by: "SAP* "
    Last changed by: "******"
When browsing the program, it's really the case, in the include   /BI0/LQI0TCT_DS23UXX, there are 3 includes,
*   THIS FILE IS GENERATED BY THE FUNCTION LIBRARY.             *
*   NEVER CHANGE IT MANUALLY, PLEASE!                           *
INCLUDE /BI0/LQI0TCT_DS23U01.
                    "/BI0/QI0TCT_DS23
INCLUDE /BI0/LQI0TCT_DS23U02.
                    "/BI0/QI0TCT_DS23
INCLUDE /BI0/LQI0TCT_DS23U03.
                    "/BI0/QI0TCT_DS230001
The U01 and U02 are containing the same function, so it's failing.
Do you ever have encountered the same problem, and if yes, how to solve it ? It already tried to reactivate the DS, but no way.
Thanks in advance
Frederic

Hi, Ralf
Thanks ! It worked ! I had to repair the function module. I assigned the points
Edited by: Frédéric GAUTHIER on Jan 29, 2010 11:12 AM

Similar Messages

Problem with delta load urgent!!

Hi,
I have a problem with delta load
We have an IP, which loads data from R/3 system daily, its a delta load to the ODS and it updates to the cube with the selection on Company Codes and 0FISCPER
we are in 3.5 system
For a couple of company codes A & B, the init was done for the period 07.2010 to 12.2099 and after tht the deltas are loaded from 07.2010 till 12.2099 and there's no pblm with tht
Now, there was some updation in R/3 system and the data was maintained for the company codes in A& B for the FISCPER 001.2010 to 006.2010, for which init wasnt maintained...
now how shall we need to load the init in this case? dnt ask me how the postings was done in R/3, but my pblm is purely related to the loading data in BW from R/3, as its very imp for the customer to see the data from 01.2010 to 12.2010 in reports, but the data was only available in reports from 07.2010 onwards
do i need to create another IP and maintain the init for 01.2010 to 06.2010? so tht this selection will automatically appear in the ODS delta loading infopackage
pls throw ur inputs ASAP
thank you

Hi Prince,
No need to maintain any Init for this data, It will be enough if you can load the data from jan 2010 to jun 2010 into your Info Cube.
Follow the below steps:
1)create full load IP for this data source.
2) give the selection as A and B company codes and 0FISCPER as 001.2010 to 006.2010
3) in menu bar, click on scheduler --> select full repair request
4) In the next screen check the check box and save
5) Now execute the IP, it will the data with out disturbing your daily delta.
follow the same procedure to load data till to your Info Cube.
Please revert if you have any questions
Regards,
Venkatesh

Use 'se38' to set variants with long time no-response in production system?

hi,Guys, When I use 'se38' to set variants with long time no-response in production system?
I think it's none of business with program performance. Maybe system response delay, But no other program like the same response happened?
best regards

Hi,
what's your problem? Didn't get the point.
You have a report, where the maintenance of the selection variant has a long runtime (in production?)
Maybe AT SELECTION screen some checks / helps are executed, which are quite fast in DEV, but access much bigger tables in PROD and need to much time. Such checks should be improved / moved after START-OF-SELECTION.
Regards,
Christian

Problem with DMGs and error: "No Mountable File Systems"

Problem with DMGs and error: "No Mountable File Systems"
The files are not corrupt. The problem is occurring with all DMGs that are apparently formatted in MS-DOS FAT16. No the file will not mount with Disk utility or any other disk mounter programs I have found.
This is now the second time this occurred and now effects my MBP and my iMac. First time i spent days with Apple support and the only solution was ultimately back up the data, reformat the HD, start over from scratch and reload everything. That lasted about a month before the problem resurfaced and is now an issue on both iMac and MBP.
I tried to identify all the programs I installed immediately before the error, as I am convinced it is the result of a software conflict.
Recent programs includes:
1) upgrading from Parallels 5.5 to 6.0 on both machines.
2) using an HP secure II usb drive and setting up a secure disk.
3) installing new itunes 10
4) new update to Flip For Mac.
The files affected are downloaded dmgs, including personal brain and google earth, both which are formatted in FAT16.
Any help or thoughts? Apple has now spent hours trying and they say i now have to reformat and wipe and start over. That is unacceptable and based on pasted experience the problem is likely to repeat itself. having to wipe and rebuild a HD ever month is not an solution. i need to fid the root problem.
In the meantime, anyone got a real solution on how to extract the data for a DMG using a different method?
Message was edited by: remaia

Where you able to find the solution, i am having the same problem, all was fine till i install some programs only same one i saw did we both did was flip4mac i uninstalled it but the problem is still there, i also restored and erased the hardrive but im not up to doing that all over again. If you found anything out let me know i would greatly appreciate it

Problem with Send and Receive Emal In SAP System

Hi gurus!
I have a following quote:
Dear !
I have a problem with send and receive email in SAP system following :
I want to test send and receive email in local network at my company. I
had two server
Server 1 : I setup Exchange Mail Server 2007 with domain controller is
fes.com
Server 2 : I setup SAP ERP ECC 6.0
On Server 1 : I created 2 account ( u1Afes.com and u2Afes.com ) and then I tested send and receive email between u1 and u2 in local network through Microsoft Outlook 2007 -> OK
and then
On Server 2: I had configured send and receive email on SAP system
through tcode SBWP, SCOT and SOST as Note 455140 - "Configuration of
e-mail, fax, paging or SMS using SMTP"
for example :
I logged in SAP system with user Basis01 (with email u1Afes.com ) -> then,using tcode SBWP -> new message -> send to u2Afes.com with Internet Mail type and then status message with green light -> sending ok
and then I have used Microsoft Outlook 2007, I logged with account u2 ->check email -> Ok. I saw message which send from u1
Finally, My problem is how can receive mail in SAP system without using Microsoft Outlook
For example:
Login system SAP with Basis01 account (with u1Afes.com ) -> tcode SBWP ->New Message -> send to u2Afes.com
and then
Login system SAP with Basis02 account (with u2Afes.com ) -> tcode ??? ->
To receive email from Basis01 (with u1Afes.com )
Please help me now
Thanks
I replace "@" with "A" because of banning email of this forum.
This quote is about sending email in local network. And we can't receive any email from the outside email address. Addition if I wanna send email to internal email in Internet (we've just tried with email address in local network) What should I config in SAP and Exchange ?
By the way, Is SAP Server IP added to Relay Agent for sending or receiving mail ?
Regards
An NLP
Edited by: An NLP on Apr 6, 2010 7:03 PM

Hi,
This problem is a classic problem of mail routing via Exchange. Exchange like most mail servers use the domain part of the email address as a means to route mails. So I will make an assumption that your main company mail addrss is "User @ fes.com".
So when you send a mail to the "User @ fes.com mail" address the mail is delivered to your Outlook mail address as this is the default route for company.
(Q) So how do you get your Exchange server to relay the mail into the sending SAP system?
(A) The easiest way would be to setup and unique mail domain for your SAP system. I always recommend "user @ client.sid.company.com" which in your case would be "u1 @ 100.PRD.fes.com". You can then instruct Exchange to send any emails addressed to 100.PRD.fes.com domain to your SAP system. Also using this format of address you can configure multiple mail connections into multiple SAP systems.
(A) Another answer would be to enter the "Full" email address (LOcal and Domain part of address) into the routing rule for Exchange e.g. "U1 @ fes.com" so that all emails addressed to this user will be delivered into SAP. However this method requires a lot of Admin as you will have to update Exchange with ALL email address that need to receive emails. Also if your corporate mail address is "U1 @ fes.com" then all mails will be forwarded to SAP.
I would definitely NOT recommend this method but the decision is up to you.
P.S. The IP address of the SAP system is entered into the mail header of the email. This is standard practice in SMTP relay. You can suppress this header in Exchange
Hope this helps
Michael

TS1559 i am have a problem with wi-fi after i update my system to IOS 7.1

i am have a problem with wi-fi after i update my system to IOS 7.1

And what would that problem entail?
Did you look at the link that you tagged?

Generic delta has problem with delts pointer time stamp

Hi All,
We have generic delta data source with Delte pointer as Time stamp. We have not used any safety limits. We are loading the data to DSO and using Additive delta. But the problem is when delta flag is set, there might be a case where some records still being inserted to table with lower time stamp. These records are not being fetched in next delta.
We are planning to keep a safety upper limit of 5 min so that those records can not be missed. But we have a doubt as it is a Additive delta duplicate records will be loaded. If we make the delta to 'new status to changed records', it is going to work?? Any other things we have to check when we make this changes??
Thanks
Haaris

Hi
If you had selected additive delta then you can load data to DSo with addition mode only. No overwrite possible.
If you want to select new or changed status then you can load to DSO with overwrite mode only.
Additive or changed delta depends on your requirement because if you want to add data to the DSO then you can go ahead with additive otherwise you have to use DSO with overwrite mode only.
You can either give safety upper limit or lower limit but if you give safety lower limit then you can only load data to DSO with overwrite mode because there could be some duplicate records.
Hope it clarifies.
Regards
Sadeesh

Problems with delta from 0HR_PT_1

Dear all,
we have some problems with the delta mechnism of 0HR_PT_1. We know that it generates Infotype 0439 when being initialized for each employee that is in the initial selection, but then we don't get any data for further changes to the workschedule.
Does anybody know the exact menaing of the fields
*Last Changed     01.04.2010*
*Transfer to                          31.03.2010*
*Latest transfer until     31.12.9999*
The overall entries in PA0439 looks like this.
Any help is highly appreciated.
Kind regards, Philipp
Client     600
Personnel number     8000617
Subtype     0001
Object ID
Lock indicator
End Date     31.12.9999
Start Date     01.01.1800
Infotype record no.
Changed on     03.03.2010
Changed by     SAPLHRMS_BIW
Last Changed     01.04.2010
Transfer to                          31.03.2010
Latest transfer until     31.12.9999
Carry out transfer     X
Current Date     03.03.2010
Time     16:52:21

Hi
We are experiencing the same pattern for 0HR_PT_2
We are able to extrat some delta data but for unknown reasons some timesheet seem to be totally reversed...So the delta data we extract is inconsistent with the dat we can see in ECC6
Have you find out the root cause of your problem ?
Thanks for your help
PY

Problems with Delta Extraction for 0CRM_OPPT_H (no data found)

Hi,
I've some problems with the Delta Extraction of the Infosource 0crm_oppt_h (CRM Opportunities Header). After initialization I get no delta data from the CRM system.
What I already did:
Activated 0crm_oppt_h Data Source (checked functionality with rsa3)
Started Info Package (Init) on BW side (worked fine)
Checked the status of the Data Source on the CRM system using BWA7 ("initial upload" is unmarked; "delta active" is marked and what makes me worry is that the column "Queue exists" in unmarked...)
If I change anything (like Phase, Expected Sales Vol.) in the opportunity, the Delta Extraction get no changes.
Could You help me out, please?
Best regards,
Markus Svec

hi Markus,
try to check oss note 788172
Release Status Released for Customer
Released on 23.03.2005
Priority Correction with high priority
Category Program error
Symptom
No data exists in delta extraction from the CRM server to the BW system for business transactions, if parallel processing is applied as per note 639072. But Data is extracted if parallel processing is switched off.ie. when BWA_NUMBER_OFF_PROCESSES is set to 1,there is data during delta. This applies to the following DataSources:
0BBP_TD_CONTR_1
0CRM_COMPLAINTS_I
0CRM_LEAD_ATTR
0CRM_LEAD_H
0CRM_LEAD_I
0CRM_OPPT_ATTR
0CRM_OPPT_H
0CRM_OPP T_I
0CRM_QUOTATION_I
0CRM_QUOTA_ORDER_I
0CRM_SALES_ACT_1
0CRM_SALES_CONTR_I
0CRM_SALES_ORDER_I
0CRM_SRV_CODES
0 CRM_SRV_CONFIRM_H
0CRM_SRV_CONFIRM_I
0CRM_SRV_CONTRACT_H
0CRM_SRV_PROCESS_H
0CRM_SRV_PROCESS_I
Other terms
DataSources, BWA, initial extraction, delta init, parallel processing, no data in delta.
Reason and Prerequisites
There is an update on the generated delta table which causes data corruption in running delta initializations as the changed delta sets will be deleted with every further update on documents. An open cursor statement is there without fetch data in SMOX3_GET_DATA.
Solution
The problem is solved with the attached corrections.After applying the corrections a new initialization of the affected datasources is necessary.

Delta Mechanism CRM to BW - Problem with delta update

Hi BW Gurus
Delta update from CRM - BW 3.X is not pulling all the newly added records and records which were saved with error, warning in CRM to BW
Can any one suggest me an approch to fix this issue
please let me know if you need more info
Thanks in Advance,
Shilpi

Hi Shilpi
Did you manage to find a solution for this problem? If so, could you please let me know how you solved it.
I am also having a problem with datasource 0CRM_SALES_ACT_1 - when I do a full load, it works, but when I try to do a Delta load, it does not bring across any data. In transaction RSA7 on the CRM source system, the entry looks like this:
Green: Delta is recorded 0CRM_SALES_ACT_1 BWQCLNT320 0
Regards
Rayan

Problem with Delta Links

I have :
- a standard Workset with pages that are delta-linked to standard pages (nothing extraordinary so far...)
- a delta-link copy of that Workset
Consequently, the pages in my Workset are linked to pages in the standard Workset (themselves delta-linked to the "stand-alone" pages). Here is the link chain :
Pages <- Pages (Workset) <- Pages (specific Workset)
I deleted certain pages in the specific Workset.
Question :
1) How can I put those pages back in the specific Workset as if they hadn't been deleted ?
(if I copy the standalone standard pages with Delta-Link, I will lose 1 level in the Delta-Link hierarchy, am I wrong ?!
Indeed, I have this actual link chain :
Pages <- Pages (specific Workset)
instead of
Pages <- Pages (Workset) <- Pages (specific Workset)
2) Is it possible to change the ID of pages inside my own Workset for I have annoying suffixes (like '_2') that I think disturb the Navigation (I am implementing xRPM 2.0) ?
Thanks for your answers.

Hi Rajeev,
1) As illustrated, the only way I found to replace the deleted Pages in my Workset was to copy them from the standard Pages.
 However, doing so, you can see in the Delta-Link tracer that this implies a direct Link from the Pages in my Workset to the standard pages.
==> this means that if the Pages in the standard Workset are modified, modifications will NOT be reported in my pages.
 Only modifications on the standard Pages will be reported...
For instance :
a or A : Pages (stand-alone)
b : Pages (standard Workset)
c or C : Pages (specific Workset)
By copying the Workset, we create this Delta-Link chain :
a1 <- b1 <- c1
an <- bn <- cn
But, by copying directly from standard Pages, we've got this :
A1 <- C1
An <- Cn
As a consequence, changes on the standard pages are OK in both cases.
ai' <- bi' <- ci'
Ai' <- Ci'
We have : ci = Ci
But changes on the pages inside the standard Workset is troublesome :
ai <- bi' <- ci'
Ai <- Ci
We get : ci' <> Ci
The whole point is : is it possible to copy the pages inside the standard Workset ?
Hope it is clearer now...

Any problems with Adobe CS5.5 and the Maverick system?

Has anyone had any problems with Adobe CS5.5 and the new Maverick OS? I don't want to install if there are issues. Thanks!

First thing I would suggest is to upgrade your server OS to a newer version if possible. Secondly try removing the apps out of the allowable apps list and instead change it so that you allow the apps that are within the specific application folder, ex: Applications/Adobe Photoshop CS5
I had similar problems with CS5 apps and by adding the apps by allowable folder instead it corrected my problem. Granted, if you have savvy users, there is the potential to open a can of worms here but it was the only way I could get it to work for "standard" non-admin user types.

Problem with Digital Signature strategy in Document Managment System

Hello ALL,
I am facing problem with Digital Signature strategy in DMS. If any help its greatly appreciated.
I have senario where Approvers in DMS will review the document and approve the document and put on their digitial signature. if i have multiple approvers maintained in the characterstics it has to check weather it has been approved by all approvers otherwise it has to reset the status to for approval.
My problem is i am able to reset the status back from approved to for approval using the badi document_status01 but when the next approver logs in to the document and change the status to approved he is not able to get the digital signature pop up which it comes only first user approves it.
can any one help me out on whats going wrong in it.
Thanks
Srikanth Aduri.

Hi,
maybe the reason for this is that the status of the digital signature is not changed. Then the system thinks that the digital signature is still completed and therefore the user is not getting the pop-up again. The database table for the digital signature for documents is TC77. I hope this information is usefull for you.
Best regards,
Christoph

Delta reocrds are not getting extracted . Problem with delta Quaue

Hello friends .
Could you please help me in this scenario ?
Its related to delta load from application 12 , - 2LIS_12_VCITM.
Some how data is not getting transferred from LBWQ to RSA7 . There are more than 200000 entries in LBWQ , but the job is not able to transfer any entries to RSA7.
For rest other application , data is going correctly .
The job status showing is correct , like XXXXX LUW are transferred there is no error in Job log , it technically correct .
I have found one notes , in SAP service market place , but still it doesnt match with my job status . My job status is NOTESID ..where as per the notes it should WKEDPI*** ( something like this ) .
I have taken below steps to solve this problem but still it doesnt work .
1.     Removed job from schedule ( the job for LBWQ to RSA7 ) and Executed the job manually .
2.     Executed Program RMSBW12.
3.     Deleted the Delta Q from RSA for application 12 and regenerated the same once again by running the infopackage , early delta initialization with out data transfer , . Once Delta Q is generated , run the job once again .
I hope , I tried with all correct way ..but still I could not able to transfer the data .
But with all above steps , still data is not transferred . Daily infopackage is running as per the schedule , and bringing only 0 record . If it still doesnt work then I have to do Re-initilization . and this is big cost for us . as we have to lock the sys for users and so on .
Could you please give me some tips , that how can I transferr the data from LBWQ to delta Q ( RSA7) . If it works then definitely , I will save my lot of time .
Please suggest me , how can I proceed . Please save me from this situation.
Many many thanks in advance.
Regards,

Hi Akshay,
Go to SMQ1 and check MCEX12 Queue. If your delta records are piling up in SMQ1 and not being transfered to RSA7, you need to check your back gound job control option once again.
The back ground collector job will collect the recrords from SMQ1 and push to RSA7.
Try to execute RMBWV312 program in SE38 and manully push all the recrods to RSA7. Once all the records are available in RSA7 you will find the MCEX12 queue will be cleared in SMQ1.
Cheers
Praveen

Problem with activation of Enhancement 'MBCF0002' in production

Hello Experts,
I have implemented the enhancement MBCF0002. For this I have created the project u2018ZKFI_TXTu2019.
I have completed with required changes in development which is working as per the functionality. I have activated the both object enhancement(SMOD) & project (CMOD) & moved into quality. In quality its moved activated version & works perfectly.
Now problem is here, when I am trying to move into production its getting deactivated both the object as a result functionality is not working.
Please guide me, how to resolve this problem also let me know if any other cause exist there.
Appreciate your helps!
Regards,
Santosh

Did you have tried to activate in production (condition if you have desired authorization)?

Problem with Delta IP on 0TCT_DS23 in Production system

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for