Problem with Enhancement Spot

Hi Experts,
I have implemented an enhancement spot in standard report program and export the data to some memory id. But the problem is when i am trying to execute the standard report the internal table which i want to export has entries. When i execute the custom program the tables does not has data. What is the problem and how can i solve that.
Rgds,
Bujji

Hi ,
Problem got resolved by myself, thank you guys...
Rgds,
Bujji

Similar Messages

Problem with enhancement RSR00001

Hi,
I hope you can help me. I've got a problem with the enhancement RSR00001. The include ist activated, but the coding isn't execute when I start my querie. No break-point help me. Nothing will run.
Any ideas?
Release BI 7.0.
Thanks
Martin

Hi,
I_STEP plays improtant role in filling up customer exit variable. Check it in your code. If not there, test it as follows.
First add IF I_STEP = 1 & your logic to fil your variable. And make you varibae as "Ready for Input". If you runn the report, you can see the values in selection screen.
Note: That the project which is having this enhancement RSR00001 should be in active version through CMOD. Sometimes usotmer exit won't work if project is in inactive versions.
Hope it helps tp solve your issue.
Regards,
Arun Thangaraj.

Problem with Enhanced Healing Brush

LR5.0, Windows7 (64 bit)
I am having a problem with the Advanced Healing Brush, where the colors in the destination area don't match the colors in the source area, even with opacity at 100. Is this a known bug, or is this something I am doing wrong?
Here's the original picture. I want to remove the date, and the spotlight underneath the date, on the bottom right.
Using the enhanced healing brush, I try to remove this and replace it with a similar area of grass
You can see the opacity is 100, and yet the color of the grass in the destination area is noticeably darker than the color of the grass in the source area.
So, what is wrong here? Bug, or user error?
By the way, I also performed a similar operation in Photoshop Elements, with much nicer results.

Hi DJ,
I find the healing brush a bit so-so. I've had the same result as yourself - it will blend in poorly leading to muddy tones.
Also the boundaries of the brushed area are too distinct. Overall, I see the clone setting as more useful.
I've had a cut at your picture, using multiple selections. I could do better,(the shadow lines are not well aligned) but I think this illustrates my point.
I find that one large selection (even though that's the example used in the LR video) rarely works well for me.
I think this tool can use some improvement.
Hope this helps,
hans

Having problems with Transparrent Spot Colour gradients Ai CS4

I would like to know how to make the spot colour transparrent on one end of the gradient tool. Have been fiddling with the gradient opacety when the one spot colour is white but I get a "grey" area between the 1st spot colour and 2nd spot colour (being black). I've tried draging the
into the 1st spot colour but this isn't working either.
HELP!!

Hi Karms...
Try this, use your shape without gradients only fill with the spot color, then open the transparency palette SHIFT+CONTROL+F10. Next select your spot color shape, in the transparency palette you see your shape, then double click alongside your shape, this create a opacity mask, like mask in Photoshop. Next you must set up your mask, usually i use a registration color to set a transparent region and withe to set opacity region, to make a blend you set a registration to withe gradient. You be aware the transparency zone is different to opacity zone.
Pd: Steve I'm, a step back from you! no more phone calls while posting

Having problem implementing enhancement spot 'OI0_OGSD_XM06'

Hi,
I have an enhancement spot using BADI 'OI0_OGSD_XM06'. It has property 'Can only be implemented SAP-internally' checked
under usability options. I want to know if this enhancement spot could be implemented. If yes, how?
Thanks in advance!

I am facing the same issue. However I learnt that we might need to use Adjusting Tool from Object Navigator/SE80 on the implementation before transporting.

Transporting issue with Enhancement spot

Hi All;
Now i have an issue when transport the enhancement spot, we have two clients, one is for developpment, and one is for testing, i found that there is an enhancement spot exists on the testing client but not exists on the developping client. And i found that the enhancement spot is deleted by myself. Is there anyone who can help me to transport the deletion from the developping client to testing client?

Hi Vincent,
In SAP BI, queries are compound of wide range of objects of "Query element" type (R3TR - ELEM).
Please, check if all associated Query elements are actually being transported. One way of making sure of this is preparing the transport through the "Transport connection" in RSA1 transaction. You can choose "Only necessary objets" in the Grouping type, drag and drop the query to the right pane and then make sure all necessary objects are checked.
Regards,
Maximiliano

Problem with Enhanced Receiver Determination

Hi Friends,
I am doing the enhanced receiver determination scenario, But it is giving the
error in SXMB_MONI like this
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
- 
- <SAP:Error xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30" xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" SOAP:mustUnderstand="">
<SAP:Category>XIServer</SAP:Category>
<SAP:Code area="RCVR_DETERMINATION">CX_RD_PLSRV</SAP:Code>
<SAP:P1>Problem while determining receivers using interface mapping: Fehler beim Parsen der Empfänger-Liste.Länge des XML-Dokuments 264</SAP:P1>
<SAP:P2 />
<SAP:P3 />
<SAP:P4 />
<SAP:AdditionalText />
<SAP:ApplicationFaultMessage namespace="" />
<SAP:Stack>Error when determining the receiver: Problem while determining receivers using interface mapping: Fehler beim Parsen der Empfänger-Liste.Länge des XML-Dokuments 264 Problem while determining receivers using interface mapping: Fehler beim Parsen der Empfänger-Liste.Länge des XML-Dokuments 264 Fehler beim Parsen der Empfänger-Liste.Länge des XML-Dokuments 264 System expected the element 'Receivers'</SAP:Stack>
<SAP:Retry>M</SAP:Retry>
</SAP:Error>
this is error is coming in the SXMB_MONI
THE DATA type(Receivers) we create in basis component is comes automatically?
are we have to create?
in my scenario i creted manually,
is it compulsory to specify the properties for the party and agency?
is it compulsory to create 2 Receiver structures in msg structure?
if yes what r those, actually i used from sap.help.com,
Can any body should give me the solution for this, regarding mapping and configuration , if anybody experienced this scenario. Pls . give me the guidelines to do.

Hi,
the mapping creating the receiver list is not producing the required element "Receivers" from Namespace "'http://sap.com/xi/XI/System". Look to the operation mapping given in the enhance Receiver Determination (IB Directory) and detect the corresponding mapping program (ESR). Copy the source payload from MONI, test the mapping program and correct it.
Regards,
Udo

Problem with Enhanced Receiver Deterrmination

Hi,
I am facing an issue with the Enhanced Receiver Deterrmination (ERD) at runtime for an EOIO scenario. When a message gets split for the defferent service it fails complaining about mapping. If I retrigger it gets delivered.
However if I provide a queue filter this failure does not occur even if logically that queue filter definition does not make any sense to the scenario. for eg: The filter is maintained for a different scenario say A, but scenario B which has ERD will work. I am well confused, shoot your questions pls. Please help in case you have faced similar issue. We are on 07s SP17.
regards
Unni

Hi Venkat,
You are correct, I use extended Receiver determination. As I have mentioned earlier, the scenario works well if I specify the queue filter, so all related objects exists.
Basically the split message with out a queue filter is poinitng back to the source message. But if I re-trigger from moni it goes well. With a queue filter, it works without a cause.
See the sample message for error
- <SAP:Receiver>
<SAP:Party agency="http://sap.com/xi/XI" scheme="XIParty" />
<SAP:Service>BS_ENVISION_SAP_EMERG</SAP:Service>
<SAP:Interface namespace="urn:sap-com:document:sap:rfc:functions">ZWM_INBOUND_NOTIFICATION_EMERG</SAP:Interface>
- <SAP:Mapping notRequired="M">
<SAP:ObjectId>oPLLbgxJOWimAK6rdZb/MA==</SAP:ObjectId>
<SAP:SWCV>oZGAQNmpEdym2dnSCqoHjQ==</SAP:SWCV>
<SAP:SP>-1</SAP:SP>
</SAP:Mapping>
</SAP:Receiver>
*<SAP:Interface namespace="http://enbridge.com/envision/envision2/jdbc">MI_TBL_WMS_SOURCE_STAGING_SDW_EGD</SAP:Interface> *
</SAP:Main>
*The actual should be *
- <SAP:Receiver>
<SAP:Party agency="http://sap.com/xi/XI" scheme="XIParty" />
<SAP:Service>BS_ENVISION_SAP_EMERG</SAP:Service>
<SAP:Interface namespace="urn:sap-com:document:sap:rfc:functions">ZWM_INBOUND_NOTIFICATION_EMERG</SAP:Interface>
- <SAP:Mapping notRequired="M">
<SAP:ObjectId>RNPgv18MOBmjhpr+oO1mNw==</SAP:ObjectId>
<SAP:SWCV>oZGAQNmpEdym2dnSCqoHjQ==</SAP:SWCV>
<SAP:SP>-1</SAP:SP>
</SAP:Mapping>
</SAP:Receiver>
*<SAP:Interface namespace="urn:sap-com:document:sap:rfc:functions">ZWM_INBOUND_NOTIFICATION_EMERG</SAP:Interface>*
</SAP:Main>

I am having a problem with enhancing a .class for JDO

Hi
i am having a rpoblem with JDO . please help me for this.
Buildfile: build.xml
compile:
xdoclet:
[ojbdoclet] May 26, 2005 11:08:55 AM xdoclet.XDocletMain start
[ojbdoclet] INFO: Running <ojbrepository/>
[ojbdoclet] May 26, 2005 11:08:56 AM xdoclet.XDocletMain start
[ojbdoclet] INFO: Running <torqueschema/>
build:
build_if_with_mainclass:
enhance-jdori:
[java] Enhancer: options:
[java] verbose = true
[java] quiet = false
[java] forceWrite = true
[java] noWrite = false
[java] sourcePath = null
[java] destinationDirectory = build/classes
[java] propertiesFileName = null
[java] doTiming = false
[java] classNames = {
[java] }
[java] jdoFileNames = {
[java] src/java/org/apache/ojb/tutorial5/Product.jdo
[java] }
[java] classFileNames = {
[java] build/org/apache/ojb/tutorial5/Product.class
[java] }
[java] zipFileNames = {
[java] }
[java] dumpClass = false
[java] noAugment = false
[java] noAnnotate = false
[java] JDO ENHANCER: using file: file:/D:/ojb-blank/ojb-blank/build/org/ap
che/ojb/tutorial5/Product.class
[java] Class Locator: using class files: {
[java] build/org/apache/ojb/tutorial5/Product.class
[java] }
[java] JDO ENHANCER: using file: file:/D:/ojb-blank/ojb-blank/src/java/org
apache/ojb/tutorial5/Product.jdo
[java] -------------------------------------------------------------------
[java] JDO ENHANCER: Enhancer: enhancing classfile ...
[java] JDO ENHANCER: scanning class org.apache.ojb.tutorial5.Product
[java] JDO ENHANCER: not found resource: META-INF/package.jdo
[java] JDO ENHANCER: not found resource: WEB-INF/package.jdo
[java] JDO ENHANCER: not found resource: package.jdo
[java] JDO ENHANCER: not found resource: org/package.jdo
[java] JDO ENHANCER: not found resource: org/apache/package.jdo
[java] JDO ENHANCER: not found resource: org/apache/ojb/package.jdo
[java] JDO ENHANCER: not found resource: org/apache/ojb/tutorial5/package.
do
[java] JDO ENHANCER: found resource: org/apache/ojb/tutorial5/Product.jdo
[java] com.sun.jdori.enhancer.util.InternalError: assertion failed: cannot
find class file for class: org/apache/ojb/tutorial5/Product
[java] at com.sun.jdori.enhancer.util.Assertion.affirm(Unknown Source)
[java] at com.sun.jdori.enhancer.meta.model.EnhancerMetaDataJDOModelIm
l.declareField(Unknown Source)
[java] at com.sun.jdori.enhancer.core.Analyzer.scanFields(Unknown Sour
e)
[java] at com.sun.jdori.enhancer.core.Analyzer.scan(Unknown Source)
[java] at com.sun.jdori.enhancer.core.Controller.scan(Unknown Source)
[java] at com.sun.jdori.enhancer.core.Controller.enhanceClass(Unknown
ource)
[java] at com.sun.jdori.enhancer.filter.Enhancer.enhanceClassFile1(Unk
own Source)
[java] at com.sun.jdori.enhancer.filter.Enhancer.enhanceClassFile(Unkn
wn Source)
[java] at com.sun.jdori.enhancer.Main.enhanceClassFile(Unknown Source)
[java] at com.sun.jdori.enhancer.Main.enhanceInputFiles(Unknown Source
[java] at com.sun.jdori.enhancer.Main.process(Unknown Source)
[java] at com.sun.jdori.enhancer.Main.main(Unknown Source)
[java] Fatal error while enhancing: JDO ENHANCER: An internal error occurr
d while enhancing input class; detailed message: assertion failed: cannot find
lass file for class: org/apache/ojb/tutorial5/Product
[java] com.sun.jdori.enhancer.EnhancerFatalError: JDO ENHANCER: An interna
error occurred while enhancing input class; detailed message: assertion failed
cannot find class file for class: org/apache/ojb/tutorial5/Product
[java] at com.sun.jdori.enhancer.filter.Enhancer.enhanceClassFile(Unkn
wn Source)
[java] at com.sun.jdori.enhancer.Main.enhanceClassFile(Unknown Source)
[java] at com.sun.jdori.enhancer.Main.enhanceInputFiles(Unknown Source
[java] at com.sun.jdori.enhancer.Main.process(Unknown Source)
[java] at com.sun.jdori.enhancer.Main.main(Unknown Source)
[java] aborted with errors.
BUILD FAILED
D:\ojb-blank\ojb-blank\build.xml:226: Java returned: 1
Please help me asap
bye
Rahul S
Senior Software Eng.
Lionbridge Tech Pvt Ltd.

Thanks for the suggestion. I have my iphone in an Otter Box and am not aware of getting any water in the phone. I tried cleaning out the docking opening with a toothbrush, no help. I will take your suggestion about going to Apple. Thanks again

Problem with Dead Spots in track volume after latest IOS GarageBand compatability update

I'm relatively new to Logic Pro and this forum so not sure on how to use either I guess.
Anyway, I recently updated my Logic Pro 9 with the latest GarageBand for IOS compatabilty update and immediately noticed that on one song a track has lost volume in parts and I can't see how. Other parts of the same track have normal volume. I can't see where the volume could have dropped. I haven't changed anything and the volume is set to 6 for the entire track.
Has anyone else experienced this and do you know of a remedy. The track I am referring to is a track with Logic Strings from the Orchestral String Instruments.

I believe this issue occurs only between songs that iTunes has converted to a lower bitrate for you during transfer to your iOS device and songs that it has not done this for. Take this Between the Buried and Me album, for instance. I have marked all of the transitions that should have been gapless but probably aren't in red. I know for sure that most of these marked transitions are indeed broken and that the most of the transitions not marked in red work flawlessly... I honestly can't remember whether or not some of these transitions were gapless or not, but the many transitions I do remember working or not working match up exactly with whether or not the songs on either side of the transition were also on other sides of the 256kbps threshold, the threshold at which I enabled iTunes to convert tracks to 256kbps AAC.
I'm going to try re-sync'ing my library with that "feature" disabled and see if it fixes my gapless playback problem. Will post the results once I test it out.

Problems with enhanced podcast

Hi,
I have a podcast on iTunes in the music section which has many listeners.
Currently the enhanced podcast is working fine in my iTunes locally. I created them via GarageBand, but if I upload them and refresh the xml file for iTunes and I download an episode from my iPhone, I must sync it to my iTunes before I get the picture within the link and description, very strange.
Also, if I just want to play my episode over the iTunes Store via my iPhone the picture is not displayed correctly. There are just some fuzzy lines and that's it. This is the next problem I have to solve
Cheers!

Hi,
I have a podcast on iTunes in the music section which has many listeners.
Currently the enhanced podcast is working fine in my iTunes locally. I created them via GarageBand, but if I upload them and refresh the xml file for iTunes and I download an episode from my iPhone, I must sync it to my iTunes before I get the picture within the link and description, very strange.
Also, if I just want to play my episode over the iTunes Store via my iPhone the picture is not displayed correctly. There are just some fuzzy lines and that's it. This is the next problem I have to solve
Cheers!

Problems with enhanced retropay setup

Hi everyone, I'm not sure why but my enhanced retropay setup is not working.
This is what I've done:
a.) Enabled INCIDENT_REGISTER for my legislation (SA)
b.) Made sure all triggers are working
c.) Created a non recurring element, Basic Salary Retro
d.) Created a recurring element Basic Salary
e.) Attached my retro event group to Basic Salary element. Set as default component. Added start of time end of time, Basic Salary Retro as element
f.) Run Payroll for January 2013
g.) Made change to basic salary
h.) Run Retropay enhanced pdf
At this point, there is no data in the report. Any ideas why? Please don't point me to the metalink I already tried there.
Many Thanks,
Igwe

Hi Igwe,
Its strange the steps mentioned by you is fine. Is your Basic element assiciate with salary Basis? If yes then please try the below steps and check.
1. Change Table Event Updates for PER_PAY_PROPOSALS table
a.Navigate: Menu option > Other Definitions > Table Event Updates
b.Query for PER_PAY_PROPOSALS in table name field
Add Insert, Update & delete Event type for PROPOSED_SALARY_N column and change type DATE_EARNED
Also, Check the Table Event Updates for for the tables PAY_ELEMENT_ENTRIES_F and PAY_ELEMENT_ENTRY_VALUES_F exist for the Date_Earned Change type.
2. Manually Regenerate the Dynamic triggers again
Unflag the enabled and generated flag for your dyanimc triggers and save
Re flag the enabled generated flag and save
3.Check if all dynamic triggers for PAY_ELEMENT_ENTRIES_F, PAY_ELEMENT_ENTRY_VALUES_F and PER_PAY_PROPOSALS table exist for legislation and business group
Rerun the report.
Hope it helps.
Thanks,
Sanjay

Problems with enhancing 0FI_GL_4 Error R8570

Dear Colleagues!
I have some troubles enhancing the 0FI_GL_4 Structure.
I did the things I have to do in RSA6 (include CI_BSIS for the field LSTAR), and I even got the extractor to work in RSA3 once! But now it does not work any more..
I suddenly get the error message:
"Extraction Structure includes invalid field INCLUDE with ABAP type" (R8570).
Does anyone out there know what this means??
Hope you can help, will certainly sign points!
Regards Silje

I think I found it:
I had an append in the DTFIGL_4, in addition to the INCLUDE. So I deleted the Append and now the LSTAR filed is there and picking up data.
But I cant seem to transport this to test! Whenever I activate the DTFIGL_4 or CI_BSIS it does not lay on a transport!
I checked Object Directory for both, and CI_BSIS was on package ZZBW (that I am used to) but DTFIGL_4 was on another package (BWFI) and SAP was set as user. How can I transport my now well functioning datasource from dev to test?
Silje

Problem with enhancing BP_HIER view BP_HIER/EOVPHierarchyTreeV

Hi experts,
Need some urgent help regarding enhancing of view BP_HIER/EOVPHierarchyTreeV in component BP_HIER.
I am facing a strange issue here.
I enhanced the view BP_HIER/EOVPHierarchyTreeV and redefined a method EH_ONNEW_NODE.
But when i check the TR object list , i do not see this method getting locked in my TR.
Still when i ported this TR to the test system , it reflected in the system.
But further when i tried porting the TR to the user test system, this change did not get reflected.
Can anyone help me as to why could this be happening in only one system?
Is it something related to any system setting at the BASIS side since it is happening only in user test system?
Any pointers are highly appreciated.
Thanks
Swapna V.

Hi Bhushan,
Will this work around work when the view class itself is standard and not getting enhanced due to this issue?
I had enhanced the view and the method and tried porting it in a new TR again. But that also did not work.
The IMPL,CTXT classes got locked in the TR , but the EH_ONNEW_NODE method was not locked in the TR somehow.
Ideally waht i have seen is like , when ever protected section of a view controller class is modified, it gets locked into your TR object list .But here , i dont see even that. Also , the method is missing in the object list.
Shown below is the object list in my TR :
Page/Controller of a BSP Application
     ZBP_HIER                      EOVPHIERARCHYTREEV.DO
     ZBP_HIER                      EOVPHIERARCHYTREEV.HTM
Class (ABAP Objects)
     ZL_BP_HIER_EOVPHIERARCHYT_IMPL
     ZL_BP_HIER_HIERARCHYTREEV_CTXT
Table Contents
     BSPWD_CMP_C_REPL
         ZENHANCEMENT_SET       BP_HIER                       BP_HIER
Thanks
Swapna.

QISR1 - New implementation with Enhancement Spot

Hello ,
I created new Z Scenario then created new badi implemenation for QISR1 and specified Z filter value.
When i try to activate the implmenetation i get message
Implementation ZIM_QISR_ZS63 migrated (see long text for instructions)
Popup screen is diplayed 'Select or Create Enhancement Implemenation'
Then I created new Enhancement Implemenation - ZIM_QISR1_ZS63
But the badi implemenation does not get activated. Please can you help
Thanks
Meghana

Can you please elaborate, what exactly is the requirement? Do you want that the message should be displayed as warning & processing should continue or something else?

Problem with Enhancement Spot

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for