Problem with EOIO Scenario

Hi Experts,
I am not able to send message with QOS EOIO from RWB but I am able to send message with QOS EO for same receiver i.e R3.
can any please guide me what could be the reason???
Thanks and Regards,
nidhi

Hi Nidhi,
For some adapters you dont have the options of using EOIO service.
Which adapter are you using.
Please refer the following for more information.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/en/ae/d03341771b4c0de10000000a1550b0/content.htm
Hope this will help.
Thanks
Ajay

Similar Messages

Problem with IDoc scenario - IDocs do not aarive to XI

Hi guys!
I have a problem with IDoc->XI->File scenario. Colleagues send IDocs from R/3 and they are not in the XI. In R/3 they look like if they were correctly sent, however, I can not see them in sxmb monitor. BUT, when they send them again explicitly from R/3 (t-code WE19), they arrive...
REALLY strange...
Any suggestions?
IDX2 metadata loaded.. I think, all needed settings are done.
Question - do I need to set up LS in XI ABAP part?
Thanx, Olian!
P.

Hi Olian ,
just check if u have followed all the following steps
SAP XI
1) RFC Destination (SM59)
a) Choose create.
b) Specify the name of the RFC destination
c) Select connection type as 3 and save
d) In the technical settings tab enter the details SAP SID/URL and system number#.
e) Enter the Gateway host as same details above SID/URL.
f) Gateway service is 3300+system number#.
g) In the Logon /Security tab, enter the client user & Password details of Destination system.
h) Test the connection and remote logon.
2) Create Port (IDX1)
a) Select create new button
b) Enter the port name as SAP+SID (The starting char should be SAP)
c) Enter the destination client.
d) Enter the RFC Destination created in SAP R/3 towards other system.
e) Save
3) Load Meta Data for IDOC (IDX2) a) Create new
b) IDOC Message Type
c) Enter port created in IDX1.
SAP R/3
1) RFC Destination (SM59)
a) Choose create.
b) Specify the name of the RFC destination
c) Select connection type as 3 and save
d) In the technical settings tab enter the details SAP SID/URL and system number#.
e) Enter the Gateway host as same details above SID/URL.
f) Gateway service is 3300+system number#.
g) In the Logon /Security tab, enter the client user & Password details of Destination system.
h) Test the connection and remote logon.
2) Create Port (We21)
a) First Select Transactional RFC and then click create button
b) Enter the destination port name as SAP+SID (The starting char should be SAP)
c) Enter the destination client.
d) Enter the RFC Destination created in SAP R/3 towards other system.
e) Save
3) Create Partner Profile (WE20)
a) Create New
b) Create the Partner no. name as same the logical system name of the destination system.
c) Select Partner type LS
d) Enter details for Type: US/USER, Agent, and Lang.
e) Click on the + button to select the message type.
f) Select Partner no. and LS which ever create above.
g) Select Message type
h) Select Process code related to the Message type.
I) save.
In SLD System Landscape Directory
TS for R/3 (Logical system):-Assign the client name created in R/3 as Logical system Name.
Ts for Third Party (Logical system):-
BS for SAP R/3 (Logical system):- Assign the client name created in R/3 as Logical system Name.
BS for Third Party (Logical system):-Enter the XI logical system name.
In Transaction SALE
Define and Assign the logical system name
Regards,
AshwinM

Problems with planning scenarios

Dear all
I've a huge problem with the scheduling of a project. I hope I can explain it properly.
I've created a project with some networks in it. The planning scenario is free scheduling and strict bottom up. I'm using the backward scheduling.
Some of the networks, which are connected with the "Main" Network now are not scheduled properly. For example I have an acitivity in the "Main" network which is connected with a FS relationship to an activity (this activity has set up a constraint earliest possible) of another network. When I'm carrying out the scheduling this activity is planned much later than the activity in the Main network. In some other similar networks the scheduling is carried out regurarly.
Now, when I'm changing the planning scenario to bottom up, canceling the start date in the network of concern and making a new scheduling of the whole project, the activity is placed in the right period. When I'm changing back the planning scenario and rescheduling the project once more, the activity is again postponed, even further in the future than before.
is somebody out there who is able to help me?
many thanks

Hello
is nobody out there who could help?
Best

Problem with EOIO in BPM Send Step

Hi All
We have 3 async send steps one after the other and it must be EOIO.
Even after giving the same Queue Name (EOIO) in all the 3 Send Steps it is working as EO.
Do we need to do any more configurations ??
Will this Queue Name appear in XML monitoring ??
We are on XI 3.0 SP15.
Thanks in Advance.
Regards
Chemmanz

Hi,
The messages persisted in the BPM can be sent to many receivers.
So, whenever we configure a BPM, in our scenario, the BPE assumes that the messages coming in to the BPM instance, could be sent to many receivers.
The QOS EOIO, does not support sending the same message to mutiple receivers.
However, with QOS EO, the message is duplicated and sent to multiple receivers.
Now, since, the BPE assumes that every message coming in, is sent to multiple receivers, it uses the QOS EO, no matter what QOS was set before.
Regards,
Smitha.

Problem with MTO scenario-urgent

hi everyone,
our client is using MTO process, where they will exchange halb materials for the fert level production order. i.e according to MTO sales order will trigger procurement seperately at all levels of bom( as sales order stock). what is happening at the client side is they are converting plnd orders to production orders generated in the stock requirement list for HALBS, as thier wish they want to use these randomly for fert production,
costs differences are arising.....
so kindly suggest a solution
thanks
madhu

Hi Madhu,
Your requirement is simple. If my understanding is right in your scenario you have a FERT (A) which is MTO and the assemblies/components (B) used for manufacturing it is a stock item or MTS.
For component A you have to define in material master MRP view 3 with planning strategy - 20 and in MRP4 maintain "1" for Individual and Collective requirement indicator.
For component B you have to define in material master MRP view 3 with a suitable planning strategy -(Not= 20) and in MRP4 maintain "2" for Individual and Collective requirement indicator.
This would resolve the problem. Reward your points,
thank you,
Regards,
Prasobh

Problem with Integration Scenario involving BPM

Hello All
I've created simple async Integration Scenario.
Sender is SOAP, then message is being processed by BPM Integration Process (some simple mapping inside - for now it is just proof of concept - later on it will split messages etc.) . Receiver is JDBC adapter.
Now, when I test Sender-> BPM (using Test Configuration tool ) - works fine, no errors.
BPM -> Receiver - as well.
But when I'm trying to test Sender -> Receiver it fails (so it does when I call Sender webservice from external tool).
Error is:
Receiver Agreement
<Trace level="1" type="B">CL_XMS_PLSRV_OUTBINDING-ENTER_PLSRV</Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">O U T B O U N D - B I N D I N G </Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T"> Cache Content is up to date </Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">determine OUTBOUND BINDING for: </Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">-SENDER </Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">-RECEIVER </Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">http://company.com/xi/sn.DataOut </Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">error with outbound binding. </Trace> <Trace level="1" type="T">
No standard agreement found for , SENDER, RECEIVER, http://company.com/xi/sn, DataOutt </Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="E">CL_XMS_PLSRV_OUTBINDING-ENTER_PLSRV</Trace>
In fact there is no Receiver Agreement for this pair of sender-receiver, but in scenario those are connected via BPM.
What am I missing in configuration to force PI to send messages correctly?
TIA
Regards
Maciej

Hi Maciej,
If you are trying to test it from the RWB -> Component Monitring-> Integration Engine-> Test Message option, then you should not be giving the receiver system and interface details.
Just specify the details of the sender system, interface name and namespace.
Give the user id and pwd details.
Give the Quality of service as "Exactly Once".
Paste the payload and click on SEND button. (DO NOT GIVE THE RECEIVER SYSTEM details).
It will work.
Thanks and Regards,
ravi Kanth Talagana

Problem with HTTP Scenario....

Hello ,
While working with the (http >BPM> RFC & FILE ) scenario ,
I am getting following error...
<b>
And while using the http Client I posted the test xml ...But I am unable to see it in the SXI_MONITOR...</b>
And using RWB --> Componet Monitoring --> Integration Engine --> Test Message I triggered the Test XML
then its going to sxi_monitor but giving error...
<b>
"The process does not support the given synchronous interface or does not support synchronous messages"
</b>
what should I do....
Please help me in this regard...

Satya ,
Is it a syncronous interface ? if it is syncronous interface if you want to see that in logs then you have to enable Logging for syncronous in SXMB_ADM .
Is it enabled ?
Are you able to post the HTTP request using HTTP client ?
And using RWB --> Componet Monitoring --> Integration Engine --> Test Message I triggered the Test XML
then its going to sxi_monitor but giving error...
The process does not support the given synchronous interface or does not support synchronous messages"
In the above mentioned error statement it is clearly stating that this stand alone test interface tool in RWB not support this scenario.
Please let me know if you need any further assistance .
Regards,
Kishore

Problem with Synchronous Scenario

Hello Experts,
Right now i am working on a synchronous scenario RFC <-> 3rd party.
RFC, with other data, passing one table to XI and 3rd party, but in response RFC will require the same table back.
Now here in XI we are not storing synchronous messages in success case. So can anyone tell me that if i want that table in reply also, what should i do?
I was thinking of option that while i communicate with 3rd party, we will create file also in which i will store that table data with the message Id, and while i will get reply back from 3rd party i will read this data from the file and then will pass it back to RFC.
But m not sure that in response how i will read that file? and will i be able to delete that file or not?
Please reply me as soon as possible as i have to give this option to my client.
Hope the question is clear.
Thanks and Regards,
Hetal

Hey,
you can do this in a couple of ways.
Fisrt, you can create a file as already mentioned and access the file from your server.
second, you can create an internal table and access it via hash map.
for both the solutions you need to create a udf.
regards,
Milan.

Problem with RNIF Scenario

Hi ,
In a B2B scenario we have RNIF as receiver ans R/3 as sender.
Is it possible to configure this scenario without BPM ? If yes ...
We have configured an IDOC to RNIF scenario with out using BPM. When the idoc is sent from the sender system to XI , XI is not able to determine the receiver system. WE have configured the party for this and it is not able to determine the receiver .
Please provide suggestions
Thanks in advance,
Hemanthika.

Hi,
>>Is it possible to configure this scenario without BPM ? If yes ...
Yes, Check this document : http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/index?rid=/library/uuid/204e2606-b925-2c10-a2aa-8a43c62523e0&overridelayout=true
>>We have configured an IDOC to RNIF scenario with out using BPM. When the idoc is sent from the sender system to XI , XI is not able to determine the receiver system.
What error are you getting? Are you using party in sender IDoc side too.. I recommend reading the above article.
Regards
Suraj

PO creation problem with classic scenario

Hi All,
We are in SRM 7.0 nad have mapped extended classic scenario. Now we want to map the Classic scenario only for a specific company code. So, my question is can we map the classic scenario on company code specific.
I tried maintianing the document type & number ranges in R/3. Maintained the number ranges & transaction type in SRM.
Also implemented BADI BBP_EXTLOCALPO_BADI.
But after creating the SC the status is "Approved" but no PO getting created in ECC. On observing RZ20 there is an system error for the number ranges.
Please let me know if I am missing some steps.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Abey.

HI,
Make sure the PO number range in ERP is same in SRM. Also have the external checkbox checked for PO number range in ERP.
Also have the same transaction type in SRM and ERP. Where the ERP transaction type should have external number range as the above mentioned profile.
Regards
Sam

Problem with SOAP Scenario

Hi,
I am trying a http to soap scenario.
In the receiver soap adapter, I have specified the following:
Target url: http://test.abc.com/
Action: handleLogin()
When I send the request, I get a "time out error" as the response in the http client tool.
However, in sxi_monitor, I get a webpage as the response(A web page is being displayed in the monitor).
What I was expecting is a response message that matches the wsdl.
I have tried using "" and a blank value for the Action field in the soap adapter, but no luck.
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Smitha.

Hi Shabarish,
Thanks for your response.
I provided the operation name in the soap adapter as specified in the blog, but I am getting a http_adapter exception. (500 internal server error)
Any clues?
Thanks,
Smitha.

Problem with Photoshop CS6

I recently uninstalled Adobe CS5 Premium Suite and I am currently using Adobe CS6 Premium Suite (both were on my iMac). Since uninstalling CS5, I now get a message when opening Photoshop CS6 that says "One or more files in the Adobe Application Support folder, necessary for running Photoshop, are missing. Please run the Photoshop installer and re-install Photoshop." I don't seem to have my original CS6 .dmg installation file. Can I download it from Adobe (just Photoshop)? I do have my original serial number saved.

The problem with that scenario is you have a suite serial number and you can't use it on a standalone Photoshop installer.
You can get the dmg for your particular suite here:
Download CS6 products
There may be a Custom or Repair option that the suite Installer might give you.
Gene

Another problem with SOAP sender

I have another problem with SOAP scenario in a different environment (PI 7.0) from my earlier post.
Scenario:
Soap Sender -> PI -> Soap Receiver
Following steps from GoogleSearch SOAP scenario in the SAP How-to Guide for SAP NetWeaver '04 entitled: "How To... Use the XI 3.0 SOAP Adapter" version 1.00 - March 2006.
I have loaded in the api.google.com/GoogleSearch.wsdl file as an External definition and created the SOAP receiver as described in the How-to guide. It takes a doGoogleSearch as input and sends back a doGoogleSearchResponse (Sync Call).
Note that the GoogleSearch.wsdl contains a complex type ResultElementArray that refers to ResultElement\[\], and a DirectoryCategoryArray that refers to DirectoryCategory\[\]. The ResultElement and DirectoryCategory types are defined in the GoogleSearch.wsdl file.
Problem One:
The generated WSDL for the SOAP sender contains the ResultElementArray and DirectoryCategoryArray types but it DOES NOT contain the required ResultElement and DirectoryCategory types. XML Spy complains that this WSDL is not valid because the type ResultElement\[\] is not defined.
Problem Two:
I generate a SOAP message in XML Spy, provide values for the doGoogleSearch fields, and send. In SXMB_MONI, the SOAP sender payload contains only the <key> value from the doGoogleSearch message body, i.e. <part name="key" type="xsd:string" />
The other doGoogleSearch fields seem to be missing, i.e.
<part name="q" type="xsd:string" />
<part name="start" type="xsd:int" />
<part name="maxResults" type="xsd:int" />
<part name="filter" type="xsd:boolean" />
<part name="restrict" type="xsd:string" />
<part name="safeSearch" type="xsd:boolean" />
<part name="lr" type="xsd:string" />
<part name="ie" type="xsd:string" />
<part name="oe" type="xsd:string" />
Does anyone know why:
(1) PI/XI seems to leave out the ResultElement and DirectoryCategory types from the SOAP sender service WSDL file?
(2) The doGoogleSearch message seen in SXMB_MONI contains only the first <key> field, and not the other fields?
Thanks for any help with this.

I have another problem with SOAP scenario in a different environment (PI 7.0) from my earlier post.
Scenario:
Soap Sender -> PI -> Soap Receiver
Following steps from GoogleSearch SOAP scenario in the SAP How-to Guide for SAP NetWeaver '04 entitled: "How To... Use the XI 3.0 SOAP Adapter" version 1.00 - March 2006.
I have loaded in the api.google.com/GoogleSearch.wsdl file as an External definition and created the SOAP receiver as described in the How-to guide. It takes a doGoogleSearch as input and sends back a doGoogleSearchResponse (Sync Call).
Note that the GoogleSearch.wsdl contains a complex type ResultElementArray that refers to ResultElement\[\], and a DirectoryCategoryArray that refers to DirectoryCategory\[\]. The ResultElement and DirectoryCategory types are defined in the GoogleSearch.wsdl file.
Problem One:
The generated WSDL for the SOAP sender contains the ResultElementArray and DirectoryCategoryArray types but it DOES NOT contain the required ResultElement and DirectoryCategory types. XML Spy complains that this WSDL is not valid because the type ResultElement\[\] is not defined.
Problem Two:
I generate a SOAP message in XML Spy, provide values for the doGoogleSearch fields, and send. In SXMB_MONI, the SOAP sender payload contains only the <key> value from the doGoogleSearch message body, i.e. <part name="key" type="xsd:string" />
The other doGoogleSearch fields seem to be missing, i.e.
<part name="q" type="xsd:string" />
<part name="start" type="xsd:int" />
<part name="maxResults" type="xsd:int" />
<part name="filter" type="xsd:boolean" />
<part name="restrict" type="xsd:string" />
<part name="safeSearch" type="xsd:boolean" />
<part name="lr" type="xsd:string" />
<part name="ie" type="xsd:string" />
<part name="oe" type="xsd:string" />
Does anyone know why:
(1) PI/XI seems to leave out the ResultElement and DirectoryCategory types from the SOAP sender service WSDL file?
(2) The doGoogleSearch message seen in SXMB_MONI contains only the first <key> field, and not the other fields?
Thanks for any help with this.

Problem with getRequestDispatcher()

Hi,
I am trying to use my servlet to redirect the client to the previous page. The servlet is one that is used by so many JSP Pages in the application. I used a java beans inside (please don't laugh) the servlet to capture the page so then pass it to the getRequestDispatcher() as shown below in the code snipet.
RequestDispatcher dispatcher =
getServletContext().getRequestDispatcher(ttipsBeans.getpgeNameAddr());
dispatcher.forward(request, response);
Problem is: It doesn't work. It brings the client back to the same page. How can I achieve this?
Thanks
Joseph

Thanks for your prompt response. That is exactly what I did with the other servlets that are called by EXACTLY ONE jsp page. Let me illustrate the problem with this scenario. Let's say I have userForm.jsp, travel.jsp, booking.jsp and vacation.jsp pages. Now all these jsp pages must use the userForm.jsp to collect user info. userForm.jsp on the other hand must call myServlet.class to send data to the database. Upon completion of its task it must redirect the client to EITHER travel.jsp, booking.jsp or vacation.jsp depending on which one invoked userForm.jsp. That is the reason why I used java beans to "remember" which page invoked userForm.jsp.

IPlanet NSAPI -- problem with KeepAlive connections

Hi
I have problems with following scenario:
When client establish KeepAlive connection with iPlanet server it sends one important custom header only on first request.
My goal is to implement filter that will add this header to all subsequent requests on this connections.
I can identify request by socket descriptor, but I don't know how to detect if this connection is still the same, or socket was closed and reused for other connection.
Thanks, Andrew

It seems like you have to make sure your web application uses sessions in order to trace an interaction with your web app clients.
You should probably write either an NSAPI filter that would add your special header to all requests to a certain application(that should supports sessions) or a servlet filter that would do the same.

Problem with EOIO Scenario

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for