Problem with ME54N / Commitment of PR in workflow

Hi,
We are having a problem getting some Purchase Requests that are Certified using ME54N to commit. It only happens to some of them, and when it does, we have to manually post the commitment in FM, as follows:
Transaction SE38
Program RFFMRP34N
On the next screen, enter the PR Number and check all blocks, but the u2018testu2019
Execute
When we do this, the PR commitment is posted.
Has anyone else had this problem with ME54N not calling the commitment routine consistently? What was the root cause and what did you do to solve it?
Thanks,
Kevin

Similar Messages

Problems with BPEL API calling a BPEL workflow

Hallo,
i have copied my text from the Application-Server forum to this forum becouse here it is a better place for my problem.
I have a problem with the BPEL API. I try to invoke a BPEL workflow with the BPEL API. Up to the Point where i call the BPEL workflow with the command "deliveryService.post(processName, action, nm);".
When this command is processed i following error:
java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: javax/ejb/EJBException
It looks like i am missing a jar file, but in my Development tool an at the compilation i get no errors or warnings. Only when command above is called.
The initialization of the deliveryService works fine.
The only point i can image an error is at the definition of the jndi for the remote connection to BPEL. There i have following entry's:
jndiProviderUrl = "http:ormi://server:port:instance/orabpel";
jndiFactory = "oracle.j2ee.rmi.RMIInitialContextFactory";
jndiUsername = "xxx";
jndiPassword = "yyy";
I get folowing errror message:
java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: javax/ejb/EJBException
at com.oracle.bpel.client.util.ExceptionUtils.handleServerException(ExceptionUtils.java:76)
at com.oracle.bpel.client.delivery.DeliveryService.getDeliveryBean(DeliveryService.java:254)
at com.oracle.bpel.client.delivery.DeliveryService.post(DeliveryService.java:174)
at com.oracle.bpel.client.delivery.DeliveryService.post(DeliveryService.java:149)
Please can someone tell me what i am doing wrong?
BS
PS: i used following tutorial to create my code for calling BPEL:
http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/ias/bpel/pdf/orabpel-Tutorial7-InvokingBPELProcesses.pdf

got some steps more ... but now i havent any clue. Out of this message i think my ProviderURL is wrong. but i try this both and got always the same error message.
jndiProviderUrl = "opnm:ormi://amy:6003/orabpel"
jndiProviderUrl = "opnm:ormi://amy:6003:oc4j_soa/orabpel"
java.lang.Exception: Erstellen von "ejb/collaxa/system/DeliveryBean"-Bean nicht erfolgreich. Es wurde folgende Exception gemeldet: "javax.naming.NamingException: Invalid provider URL
     at com.evermind.server.rmi.RMILocation.createRMILocation(RMILocation.java:80)
     at com.evermind.server.rmi.RMILocation.createRMILocation(RMILocation.java:57)
     at com.evermind.server.rmi.RMIClient.getLocations(RMIClient.java:661)
     at com.evermind.server.rmi.RMIClient.getDomain(RMIClient.java:640)
     at com.evermind.server.rmi.RMIClient.getContext(RMIClient.java:534)
     at com.evermind.server.rmi.RMIInitialContext.get(RMIInitialContext.java:44)
     at oracle.j2ee.rmi.RMIInitialContextFactory.getInitialContext(RMIInitialContextFactory.java:45)
     at javax.naming.spi.NamingManager.getInitialContext(NamingManager.java:667)
     at javax.naming.InitialContext.getDefaultInitCtx(InitialContext.java:288)
     at javax.naming.InitialContext.init(InitialContext.java:223)
     at javax.naming.InitialContext.<init>(InitialContext.java:197)
     at com.oracle.bpel.client.util.BeanRegistry.lookupDeliveryBean(BeanRegistry.java:277)
     at com.oracle.bpel.client.delivery.DeliveryService.getDeliveryBean(DeliveryService.java:250)
     at com.oracle.bpel.client.delivery.DeliveryService.post(DeliveryService.java:174)
     at com.oracle.bpel.client.delivery.DeliveryService.post(DeliveryService.java:149)
Please can someone help me?
What is wrong wis my ProviderURL?
BS

Problem with multiple commits

I've set up several queues, each with a notification registered for a PL/SQL procedure to handle enqueued messages. I would like to enque a message into queue 'a' and have procedureA() handle processing then have procedureA enqueue the result into queue 'b' and so on.
These procedures have DML in them and some may enqueue multiple result items into one or more aq queues.
My problem is that when I envoke this chain of processing via a insert trigger I need to commit multiple times before the processing is complete (using sqlplus). I have tried to code commits in the procedures where needed but it seems to have no effect.
I must not understand something basic about how transactions are managed in AQ. Does anyone have any ideas on where I can find more information?
Thanks,
Jeff

The enqueue and dequeue options provide the VISIBILITY parameter, setting this to IMMEDIATE renders the enqueue/dequeue operation non-transactional in the sense that enqueue/dequeue operations are immediately visible to other sessions, rather than when a commit is issued.
This is essentially the same behavior you might get if you wrapped the enqueue/dequeue operations in an autonomous transaction.
Be careful what you wish for though. Databases are by their very nature transactional systems. Make sure this is what you really want to do.
Chris

Problems with unzip widget New! My Workflow InBox Adobe AIR Widget

Hi,
I just tried to download the new widget, but I was not able to unzip.
Message:
! Y:\ablage\Download\My Workflow InBox Adobe AIR Widget - zip file.zip: The archive is either in unknown format or damaged
I was using WinRar 3.7 and WinRar 3.51
Any suggestions?
Thanks
Katja

Hey Noam,
Thanks for your reply!
In a bit of a stroke of luck, we have managed to fix the first issue - the video was simply placed too far down the page, and for some reason was creating extra space at the bottom. Moving it up the height of the widget fixes the issue!
We are still experiencing the second issue however with the pages apearing white and displaced. This is now happening in Chrome too. You can see this here and in the screenshot below:
I will email you the most up to date Muse file that is causing the problem above.
Many thanks for your time,
Dominic

Having problems with Bridge shutting down after saving photo in PS Cs5,,,,,,,,, Also when i attempt to update either PS or bridge get an error message in Adobe application manger "Error loading updater workflow"

Having problems with Bridge shutting down after saving photo in PS Cs5,,,,,,,,, Also when i attempt to update either PS or bridge get an error message in Adobe application manger "Error loading updater workflow"

Sorry for the late reply. My email firewall has become a little over zealous & sent a lot of my emails straight to my junk email folder, so I have only just now discovered your reply in my junk mail folder.
The only "don't open files exceeding xxx megabytes" instruction I can find in my Prefs, is in the Bridge Prefs for Thumbnails, & mine is set at 1000mb. The biggest files I handle are bigger than 200mb so I should be able to open a few, not just one.
However, this doesn't explain why I can open a psd format file of 180mb, close it, but then can't open a RAW format file of only 26mb immediately after.
I can open the RAW file only if I restart my computer - very annoying!
However, thanks for the advice about the video card & memory.
So, I'm still stuck as to what the issue is.

Problem with custom sharepoint designer approval workflow - check box: 'Start this workflow to approve publishing a major version of an item' is greyed out

I wanted to create a simple approval workflow. Hence I opted to start from scratch rather than copy the OOTB approval WF. Using SharePoint Designer (not Visual studio) I created a reusable workflow and have added the built in 'Start approval process' action.
It's saved and published globally.
Everything works fine except that when associating the WF with a list the 'Start this workflow to approve publishing a major version of an item' check box is disabled.
Major and minor versioning is enabled for the library.
What am I missing here? Or do I have to start from the OOTB approval WF to get this to work?
Regards
Henning

Again - new ideas pop up right after defining the issue as a problem. :-) Problem solved!
I solved this by creating a new workflow from the original publishing approval workflow (copy and replace), but instead of tweaking the already defined approval process (WF action) I deleted it, then deleted all initiation form and local variables,
and then added the 'Start approval process' action again. This re-installs all the necessary local variables without any initiation form involvement, which is just what I want.
From here I can tweak the workflow to make it more user friendly, much like
described by Bobby Chiang in his great blog.
Remember to add action Set Workflow Variable 'EnableContentApproval' to Yes right before the Start Approval Process action, else the document's status won't be set to 'Approved' or 'Rejected' as an output of the workflow.
Learning every day!
Henning

Need to send HTML email from Workflow : problem with sender

Hi all,
i need to send HTML email from my Workflow. I did it but i have a problem with the sender. The sender of email is always the agent responsible of workitem, and i don't want the receiver can answer to sender. So i need to put a false email address like nosender.at.mycustomer.com.
Possible to do that ?
Thanks for your help.
Cheers

Hi rick
How to change the wf-batch to some other name as you mention in previous reply. Can you give some details of that. If i use the function module SO_NEW_DOCUMENT_ATT_SEND_API1 how to change the wf-batch name and if i use send mail step in my workflow how to change wf-batch name.
Regards
vijay

Problems with "Author once" workflow, can't transcode HDV to BD and DVD

Adobe claims that with Encore CS3 you can
"author once, deliver to three formats" -- Blu-ray, DVD and Flash. I have been doing some research and testing, but have not been able to get it to work.
It seems as though Encore is not capable of taking HDV 1080i60 footage and transcoding it for both Blu-ray and DVD. The Blu-ray looks great, but the downconverted transcode for DVD is completely unusable.
Link to screen shot of HDV to DVD transcode. (Note: this is a frame at 100%, so the "comb teeth" really are that big.)
I have seen some pretty pathetic downconversions from HDV to DV resolution, but this is the most creatively useless one I've come across so far.
I have been able to use Dynamic Link to get an almost acceptable "author once" workflow from HDV footage. Unfortunately, I have not been able to find a way to get Encore or After Effects to render fields for the DVD transcode, so fast-moving graphic elements and text have jerky/strobing motion.
FYI, I got Dynamic Link working well for non-fast clips by doing the following:
Make sure that "Separate Fields" was set to "Upper" in "Interpret Footage" for the HDV clip.
Set the clip's frame blending mode to "Frame Mix" ("Pixel Motion" works, just take longer).
Enable Frame Blending for the comp.
(Enable Motion Blur for the comp if any layers are using Motion Blur).
If only there were a button to enable field rendering for the comp along with Frame Blending and Motion Blur, as both of those options directly affect how the Dynamic Link renders/transcodes in Encore.
I noticed that without Frame Blending enabled for both the clip and the comp, the motion in the transcode was very jerky, even though the clip had not been time stretched/remapped.
Does anyone know of some way to get the mythical "author once" workflow to work? Perhaps it's only for progressive workflows and not interlaced? Could this be a Mac-related problem (I have not been able to test on Windows)?
I know I can downconvert first, then import into Encore, and that does work fine, but that completely negates the wonderful concept of "author once".
Any help or advice is greatly appreciated.
-Joel Granholm
Details:
Encore CS3 3.0.1.008
After Effects CS3 8.0.1.8
Premiere Pro CS3 3.0.1
Final Cut Studio 2
Mac OS X 10.4.10
Mac Pro 8-core, 8 GB RAM / MacBook Pro 17" 2-core, 4 GB RAM
Shooting/editing in HDV 1080i60
Trying to create:
BD: NTSC, 1440x1080, 29.97i (upper field first), H.264.
DVD: NTSC, 16:9 Aspect Ratio, 29.97i (lower field first), MPEG2

Ruud,
Gspot showed there was a problem with the file. What it said was of the 130K frames, most were not needed. I went back to the editor and reconstructed the 130K file. Had problems trying to export to M2v. PPro 2.0 would freeze every time, sometimes in a few minutes, sometimes just short of completing, approx 2 hours(this was a 2 pass vbr setup). I experienced problems just trying to make an AVI file for importing into Encore 2.0. A lot of water has gone under the bridge since I first started this journey(over 300 hours). My first shot at elation occurred when I decided to try an m2v at vbr 1 pass instead of 2 pass. It worked. I say this because of late I have successfully made an Avi file, Imported the timeline and in fact satisfactorily made an m2v file (2 pass). The m2v was also brought into Encore 2.0. Though I have 4 HD's, it seems to me that as I am moving toward a successful product, I'm finding that I've located all my assets on one HD. Is this the way to go? I'd like to thank the alert for using Gspot. And I will, always. I believe that if I had used Gspot earlier I would not have been trying to fix the problem using a bad asset.
I've been able to make an iso file, though having trouble making a playable disc.

Problem with oracle workflow builder 2.6.3.5

Hello
I have installed oracle workflow server 2.6.3 on a oracle 10G 10.2.0.1 in Red Hat linux Enterprise 4L and I have Oracle workflow builder 2.6.3.5 on Microsoft Windows XP Service pack 2
I have the following error when i try to save or open and itemtype from the database
1005: Language is not populated, please refers to Workflow documentation for steps on populating a language.
How can i solve this i've alredy changed the NLS_LANG to match with the server
In the server the language is set to American and in the NLS_LANG i have set like this AMERICAN_AMERICA.US7ASCII
hope you can help me as soon as posible
Andres

Hi Matt thanks for the answer
i've already seen the wf_languages table and i have the following:
CODE NLS_CODESET I
AR AR8ISO8859P6 N
BG CL8ISO8859P5 N
CA WE8ISO8859P1 N
CS EE8ISO8859P2 N
D WE8ISO8859P1 N
DK WE8ISO8859P1 N
E WE8ISO8859P1 N
EG AR8ISO8859P6 N
EL EL8ISO8859P7 N
ESA WE8ISO8859P1 N
F WE8ISO8859P1 N
CODE NLS_CODESET I
FRC WE8ISO8859P1 N
GB WE8ISO8859P1 N
HR EE8ISO8859P2 N
HU EE8ISO8859P2 N
I WE8ISO8859P1 N
IS WE8ISO8859P1 N
IW IW8ISO8859P8 N
JA JA16EUC N
KO KO16KSC5601 N
LT NEE8ISO8859P4 N
N WE8ISO8859P1 N
CODE NLS_CODESET I
NL WE8ISO8859P1 N
PL EE8ISO8859P2 N
PT WE8ISO8859P1 N
PTB WE8ISO8859P1 N
RO EE8ISO8859P2 N
RU CL8ISO8859P5 N
S WE8ISO8859P1 N
SF WE8ISO8859P1 N
SK EE8ISO8859P2 N
SL EE8ISO8859P2 N
TH TH8TISASCII N
CODE NLS_CODESET I
TR WE8ISO8859P9 N
US US7ASCII Y
ZHS ZHS16CGB231280 N
ZHT ZHT16BIG5 N
37 rows selected.
as you can see i have installed the american_america.us7ascii
also the nls_lang key in HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\ORACLE\KEY_oracleas1
is set to AMERICAN_AMERICA.US7ASCII
I don't know wich is the problem with this
thank you again

Siebel Problem With a Workflow Process (Pleaseee help REAL PROBLEM)

Well the problem is this i have a designed a workflow who is called by a JOB. Its functionality is to close Service Requests at certain time in the night.
when i simulate a workflow against 2 different Servers it works fine without errors, but when i run a job that calls this WP in those servers i have diferent errors in diferent steps.
In one server i have this kind of error in the last step "Cerrar Requerimiento":
SBL-EXL-00151
SBL-SCR-00141
SBL-BPR-00162
This operation is not allowed when there are no records displayed.
Please execute a query that returns at least one record or add a new record
and in the other i have this error in the 3er step:
SBL-SCR-00141- Problem Running a eScript
in spanish:
Error de tiempo de ejecuci?n de Siebel eScript en el procedimiento 'GetFieldValue' de BusComp [Action]:
Error: SiebelError: Esta operaci?n no se permite cuando no hay registros mostrados. Ejecute una consulta que devuelva por lo menos un registro o agregue un nuevo registro.(SBL-DAT-00215)
(SBL-SCR-00141)
Error al invocar servicio 'BCH EAI Query Utility', m?todo 'UpdateRecord' en el paso 'Cerrar Actividades'.(SBL-BPR-00162)
(error in the Runtime of the Siebel eScript in the process GetFieldValue of Action,This operation is not allowed when there are no records displayed.
Please execute a query that returns at least one record or add a new record
error invoking the service "BCH EAI Query Utility in the Method UpdateRecord in the step "Cerrar Actividades".
If they have the same job and workflow, and BS's active(i use the BS in other workflows and no problem with it) why they give error in diferent steps but they work fine when i use the Business Simulator?, its there a solution?, this can be a problem about the server config or triggers??
thanks a lot!

Hi,
1.Is you're server and youre client using the same version of SRF ?
2.Is the version for workflow in server and the one youre testing in client are the same ?
3. Last but not least this BCH EAI Query Utility search spec is it correct ? Can it able to return at least one record base on you're search spec because I know some business service are required to return at least one record else it will throw error.
Thanks,
Joey Tan , Malaysia

Problem with Matching and Merging Step of MDM Workflow

Hi,
I have created a workflow which will first Match Step where the user will do both
Matching and Merging. Then, it will go for a process step Final Review.
Then, it will go for Branch step which is named as Decide on Check in.
There are two workflow which are launched after this step.
My workflow ran one time.
The number of records is: 19585. The Match step which is assigned to a different user is not performing.
It is a simple match based on First Name, Middle Name and Last Name.
Any suggestion?
Regards
Kaushik Banerjee

Hi Kaushik,
What do you mean with "not Performing"? One suggestion, just log in with the 'Different User' who has been assigned for the matching task, and under that user goto the matching tab, in matching tab you will find a sub tab for Workflow, I hope you can work from there, If this doesnt solve your problem, then please let us know.
Cheers,
Cherry.
Sorry problem with button;... so message came again... apologize.....
Edited by: Cherry on Mar 23, 2009 9:42 PM

Problems with Automatic Workflow Customizing

Hi!
I am having problems with Automatic Workflow Customizing (SWU3). I am trying to execute "Configure RFC Destination" manually. I receive the message "Synchronization of passwords failed".
We are using CUA and it is therefor not possible to create the user from SWU3 which means that WF-BATCH has been created in CUA with a pw which is then filled in by me when executing "Configure RFC Destination".
WF-BATCH has authorization SAP_NEW, SAP_ALL
My user also has SAP_NEW and SAP_ALL and usergroup SUPER.
Does anyone know what might be the problem?
Sincerley
Anders Öhrling

Hello Anders,
Check if the user is locked in SU01. Then check if your user has been created in CUA.
It is recommended to delete WF_BATCH. The system will auto create the user ID WF-BATCH and synchronize the password.
Do let me know if your problem is resolved.
Thank you.
Regards,
Manomeet
- Award points if helpful -

Problem with cproject workflow

hi all,
i have created one workflow which will be treaged when i will release any task from the browser. when i will release this task my project should be released. (this is only for testing ) my workflow is working fine but it is releasing after 3-4 hrs. can anybody tell me that why it is taking so much time? it might be problem with some basis/system settings.so plz basis ppl also look at it and try to help me.
its urgent so plz reply as soon as possible.
Thank you very much in advance.
Regards,
Hetal

wow!, thats sounds really strange.
I propose you set up an example and open an OSS call.
The cpro guys from SAP should have a lok at this and provide a fix.
But if you release a task, the workflow is started as soon as you save or do you reenter the project directly?
There exists a kind of event handler BADI_EVENT, where you can control field changes.
In your case to release the task and need the release of the upper project. I don't like this process, but why not.
One possibility is making a small modification. As soon as task is released, we release all subtasks too. So it can make sense to release the project too.
I guess 3 lines of coding are required, but where
Please try the BADI DPR_EVENT oder the DPR_ATTRIBUTES and in the SET DATA routine, try to set the project release information.
regards
Björn

Workflow problem with status Ready

HI,
I have a problem with the workflow not getting completed.
The workflow is for the employee attendace 20000081 .
After the manager of the employee accepts the leave application posted by employee , The workflow is in the following state: -
ID 000000340552 Work item type    Background step
Work Item text Find Employee .
Status <b>Ready</b>
Now the question is there any background job which needs to be scheduled for changing the all the workitem with status 'Ready' to be executed .
since once I execute this step manually then the workflow again goes in the ready status with the next step and the next step in this case is 'Create attendance/absence' This stpe of the workflow is in again status 'Ready'.
Please let me know if some know about this problem.
Thanks in advance .
Ankur

Hi ,
Thanks for the prompt reply.
I have tried the auto customizing and I am geeting the following log generated :
Auto-Customizing: General tasks
         E WZ:119 Instances for task TS60001307 already exist
Task TS60001307     not classified as general task
         E WZ:119 Instances for task TS70008037 already exist
Task TS70008037     not classified as general task
         E WZ:119 Instances for task TS70008125 already exist
Task TS70008125     not classified as general task
And while checking the customizing setting in SWU3 the folling entires exists but as I understand the seeting is proper, please have alook below:
An active plan version exists
     Workflow administrator maintained
     RFC destination: User locked
     Generic decision task classified completely
     Tasks for document generation fully classified
     T77* tables all available
     Monitoring job for missed deadlines is scheduled
     Monitoring job for work items with errors is scheduled
     Sending to objects and HR objects activated
     Entries missing in PD control tables
     Default Domain for Internet Mail Maintained
Workflow development environment
     Customizing incomplete
Prefix numbers for standard object types maintained
     An active plan version exists
     T77* tables all available
     Number range defined for customer tasks
     Entries missing in PD control tables
Please let me know if this is not proper .
Thanks and Regards,
Ankur

Workflow 2.6.3.5 - Problems with font in OA

I have some problems with fonts in Oracle Workflow: i created a process in wf builder and a package that start the process..in the package i put a text body for the notifications with 'b' and '/b' but when i read the notification in workflow manager i cant see the bold font!! Anyone can help me?? I suppose that this problem is linked with HTML code that has to be set in some preferences menu, but i cant find it..but it may be another reason!
Another problem that i have is that i cant disable the history window in the notification (even adding to the message the attribute #HISTORY)..
THX for your help
Jac ;)
Message was edited by:
JaCoRoBo

1. I am unable to understand the first problem. Please note that if you want to display HTML formatted content, you will have to use one of the following options.
PLSQL Documents - 32K size limit
PLSQLCLOB Documents - CLOB
Embedded Fwk Regions - Only in Oracle Applications
If you are specifying HTML content within Item Attributes that you want to be eventually displayed in the notification the HTML tags could be decoded and displayed as is without formatting.
2. There is no documented way to disable the Default Action History within the notification body. You may define the Document type message attribute #HISTORY, assign a PLSQL Document API to it and return null from the Document code. This should hide the action history.
Hope this helps.
Vijay

Problem with ME54N / Commitment of PR in workflow

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for