Problem with Multiple Versions of the Same Activex

Hi,
I Installed some "ABC" Activex 9.5 version and 10.1 version in the system.
I have ASP.net webpage which should use only 9.5 version of Activex.  But by default 10.1 version is active and invoking by webpage.
Is there any way to enforce from webpage to use only 9.5 version of Activex?
Please let me know if you need more details.
Thanks & Regards,

Hi,
Have you tried to uninstall this Activex in Manage add-on, then install the 9.5 version? Please have a try.
Roger Lu
TechNet Community Support

Similar Messages

  • Problem with multiple threads accessing the same Image

    I'm trying to draw into one Image from multiple threads. It works fine for a while, but then suddenly, the image stops updating. Threads are still running but the image won't update. I'm using doublebuffering and threads are simply drawing counters into Image with different speed.
    It seems like the Image gets deadlocked or something. Anyone have any idea what's behind this behavior or perhaps better solution to do such thing.
    Any help will be appreciated.

    Sorry Kglad, I didn't mean to be rude. With "No coding
    errors" I meant the animation itself runs with no errors. I'm sure
    you could run the 20 instances with no freezing (that's why I put
    the post :) ) But I'm affraid it is an animation for a client, so I
    cannot distribute the code.
    Perhaps I didnt explain the situation clearly enough (in part
    because of my poor english...).-
    - By 20 instances I mean 20 separated embedded objects in the
    html
    - The animation is relatively simple. A turned on candle, in
    each cycle I calculate the next position of the flame (that
    oscilates from left to right). The flame is composed by 4
    concentric gradients. There is NO loops, only an 'onEnterFrame'
    function refreshing the flame each time.
    - It's true that I got plenty variables at the _root level.
    If that could be the problem, how can I workaround it?
    - It is my first time trying to embed so many objects at the
    same time too. No idea if the problem could be the way I embed the
    object from the html :(
    - The only thing I can guess is that when a cycle of one of
    the object is running, the other 19 objects must wait their turn.
    That would explain why the more instances I run, the worst results
    I get. In that case, I wonder if there's a way to run them in a
    kind of asynchronous mode, just guessing...
    Any other comment would be appreciated. Anyway, thanks a lot
    everybody for your colaboration.

  • Problems with multiple connections in the same transaction

    Hi all !
              I'm have two questions regarding the way weblogic handles multiple
              connections.
              1) first, I don't understand why weblogic always create a new Managed
              Connection when I'm asking for 2 connection handles on the same connection
              factory and with the same connectionRequestInfo. Isn't it supposed to share
              connections ?
              For instance, the following snippet of code results in the creation of 2
              managed connections:
              ConnHandle conn1 = myCF.getConnection(myRequInfo);
              ConnHandle conn2 = myCF.getConnection(myRequInfo);
              The class corresponding to myRequInfo does implement the equals and hash
              method, so that weblogic's connection manager could use them to check that
              the queried connections are the same, and thus could share a single
              ManagedConnection between multiple connection handles. Apparantly it does
              not do that...
              2) OK, I just let weblogic create the 2 managed connections, but... My use
              of the connections is as part of a transaction. Here is what happens:
              ConnHandle conn1 = myCF.getConnection(myRequInfo);
              // a new managedConn1 is instanciated. the following happens (just a
              description)
              // xar1 = managedConn1.getXAResource()
              // xar1.start(NOFLAGS)
              // I use the conn1 handle
              conn1.close();
              //xar1.end(SUSPEND)
              ConnHandle conn2 = myCF.getConnection(myRequiInfo);
              // a new managed connection managedConn2 is instanciated.
              // xar2 = managedConn2.getXAResource();
              // xar2.start(RESUME)
              // I use conn2 handle
              conn2.close();
              // xar2.end(SUSPEND);
              // my bean returns from the remote invocation
              // the client of the bean asks to commit (using UerTransaction.commit on the
              client side)
              // xar2.end(SUCCESS)
              // xar2.commit(onePhase=true);
              // managedConn2.cleanup();
              And that's all. So, as one can see, managedConn1.cleanup was never called.
              When looking in the weblogic console, I can see that I have one connection
              with 0 handle and one with 1 handle, deemed as still being in a transaction.
              So, the conenction manager apparantly loses a managed connection during the
              transaction. And it's very very bad because after a couple of transactions,
              I'm running out of managed connections (I had set a limit of 10).
              Any one has seen such a weird behavior ? Is this a problem on my side, or
              weblogic's ? Thanks for your help.
              Sylvain
              

              I ran another test. This time I have a bean that makes use of a connector
              once per method invocation. The bean method invoked is "sayHello" and it
              gets a connection to the EIS, perform an operation on it and release it. The
              connector I developed uses XA transactions.
              My test client just calls 3 times myBean.sayHello().
              I can distinguish two cases:
              1) first, the client doesn't do transaction demarcation. In this case, since
              the sayHello method is marked as requiring transaction, the folowing happens
              in the bean:
              // **** first invocation of the bean
              connHandle = myCF.getConnection();
              // managedConn1 is instanciated
              // xar1 = managedConn1.getXAResource()
              // xar1.start(NOFLAGS);
              // managedConn1.getConnection gives a connection handle
              connHandle.doSomeWork();
              connHandle.close()
              // xar1.end(SUCCESS);
              // the bean returns from its invocation
              // xar1.commit(onePhase=true)
              // managedConn1.cleanup()
              // **** second invocation of the bean
              connHandle = myCF.getConnection();
              // managedConnectionFactory.matchManagedConnection is called. It returns the
              managed connection (managedConn1) that is in the passed set
              // xar1 = managedConn1.getXAResource()
              // xar1.start(NOFLAGS);
              // managedConn1.getConnection gives a connection handle
              connHandle.doSomeWork();
              connHandle.close
              // xar1.end(SUCCESS);
              // the bean returns from its invocation
              // xar1.commit(onePhase=true)
              // managedConn1.cleanup()
              // **** third invocation of the bean
              connHandle = myCF.getConnection();
              // managedConnectionFactory.matchManagedConnection is called. It returns the
              managed connection (managedConn1) that is in the passed set
              // xar1 = managedConn1.getXAResource()
              // xar1.start(NOFLAGS);
              // managedConn1.getConnection gives a connection handle
              connHandle.doSomeWork();
              connHandle.close
              // xar1.end(SUCCESS);
              // the bean returns from its invocation
              // xar1.commit(onePhase=true)
              // managedConn1.cleanup()
              2) second case : the client performs transaction demarcation. In that case,
              the connection manager instanciates 3 managed connections, calls start/end
              on each XAResource corresponding to each managed connection, calls commit
              once, but also calls cleanup only once, leaving 2 lost managed connections
              The client looks like this:
              UserTransaction utx = context.lookup("javax/transaction/UserTransaction");
              utx.begin();
              MyBean myBean = ctx.lookup(".......");
              myBean.sayHello();
              myBean.sayHello();
              myBean.sayHello();
              utx.commit();
              on the server the following happens:
              // **** first invocation of the bean
              connHandle = myCF.getConnection();
              // managedConn1 is instanciated
              // xar1 = managedConn1.getXAResource()
              // xar1.start(NOFLAGS);
              // managedConn1.getConnection gives a connection handle
              connHandle.doSomeWork();
              connHandle.close()
              // xar1.end(SUSPEND);
              // the bean returns from its invocation
              // **** second invocation of the bean
              connHandle = myCF.getConnection();
              // managedConn2 is instanciated
              // xar2 = managedConn2.getXAResource()
              // xar1.isSameRM(xar2) is called. returns true
              // xar2.start(RESUME);
              // managedConn2.getConnection gives a connection handle
              connHandle.doSomeWork();
              connHandle.close()
              // xar2.end(SUSPEND);
              // the bean returns from its invocation
              // **** third invocation of the bean
              connHandle = myCF.getConnection();
              // managedConn3 is instanciated
              // xar3 = managedConn3.getXAResource()
              // xar2.isSameRM(xar3) is called. returns true
              // xar3.start(RESUME);
              // managedConn3.getConnection gives a connection handle
              connHandle.doSomeWork();
              connHandle.close()
              // xar3.end(SUSPEND);
              // the bean returns from its invocation
              // the client invokes commit on the UserTransaction
              // xar3.end(SUCCESS);
              // xar3.commit(onephase = true);
              // managedConn3.cleanup();
              And so, managedConn1 and managedConn2 got lost in the way...
              What's more puzzling, it's that when monitoring my connector with the
              console, I can see that there are 3 connections. 2 declared as still having
              one handle used and being in transaction, and one not in transaction and
              with 0 active handle. BUT when monitoring the JTA part of the server, I can
              see that there has been 1 transaction that committed, and no connection is
              "in flight" as the console says. So, on one side the console says 2 managed
              connections are still part of a transaction while on the other it says that
              no transactions are currently in flight.
              Thanks for any kind of help on this very bizarre behavior.
              Sylvain
              

  • Problem with multiple .swf in the same page

    Hi everybody,
    I got a small animation written in actionscript 2.0. I need
    to load it several times in a webpage (about 20 instances), but
    seems to be too many work and the web browser freezes.
    Anyway, it's a relatively simple script (not complex
    arithmetics per cycle, although two or three color gradient
    refreshing), so I think the problem could be the fact of having so
    many instances running at the same time...
    Is there any way to fix this problem without reducing the
    quality of the animation?
    Thanks a lot!

    Sorry Kglad, I didn't mean to be rude. With "No coding
    errors" I meant the animation itself runs with no errors. I'm sure
    you could run the 20 instances with no freezing (that's why I put
    the post :) ) But I'm affraid it is an animation for a client, so I
    cannot distribute the code.
    Perhaps I didnt explain the situation clearly enough (in part
    because of my poor english...).-
    - By 20 instances I mean 20 separated embedded objects in the
    html
    - The animation is relatively simple. A turned on candle, in
    each cycle I calculate the next position of the flame (that
    oscilates from left to right). The flame is composed by 4
    concentric gradients. There is NO loops, only an 'onEnterFrame'
    function refreshing the flame each time.
    - It's true that I got plenty variables at the _root level.
    If that could be the problem, how can I workaround it?
    - It is my first time trying to embed so many objects at the
    same time too. No idea if the problem could be the way I embed the
    object from the html :(
    - The only thing I can guess is that when a cycle of one of
    the object is running, the other 19 objects must wait their turn.
    That would explain why the more instances I run, the worst results
    I get. In that case, I wonder if there's a way to run them in a
    kind of asynchronous mode, just guessing...
    Any other comment would be appreciated. Anyway, thanks a lot
    everybody for your colaboration.

  • Can iTunes handle multiple versions of the same app?

    Now that iTunes, iOS, and iDevices have been around long enough for users to have multiple devices on multiple iOS versions, is Apple doing anything to allow users to run multiple versions of the same app through iTunes?
    Case in point I have an older iPhone running iOS-5 with a few apps that are now running exclusively on iOS-7, my new iPhone is on iOS-7. Once I sync my new phone with the updated versions of the app, iTunes usually dumps the old version into the trash bin. But what if I need that older version to continue running it on my iOS-5 iPhone?
    Is there a workaround for this? I've considered using an old PC as my base computer for sycning the new iPhone, but I still fear that the new app updates will go to all devices running on my iTunes account through iCloud.
    If Apple doesn't address this problem at some point then as the years go by certain iDevices will eventually become completely useless even if they are a fully functional piece of electronics.
    (spare me the "that's their plan, corporate greed" replies).
    Thanks in advance!

    Yes, the apps SHOULD be developed to work with the new stuff, No, not all apps keep their old versions in the App Store, BUT, finally Apple has ALLOWED developers to have multiple versions of an App in the store.
    The problem isn't about retarding development, it's about Apple trying to force users to buy new things that they don't need because the old thing, though it works just fine & has the apps that you need, is unable to be used because the apps have been updated in iTunes. Why can't you allow me to keep Facebook 5.0.1 for my old iPhone 3G that is used as an iPod, Facebook 6.7.2 for my iPod Touch & Facebook 19.6.4 for my new iPhone 8? As of now I can download the old version on the old device, but when I sync it it always tries to 'Update' it & then says 'Can't be updated because this version is incompatible with this device' making the sync take 3x as long & meaning that if my device crashes for some reason or I choose to restore it becasue of problems I have to go find the old version, hoping that I saved it, delete the new version, drag in the old version, THEN sync & then move the old version back before updating from my other device (Having done this with the 3G & iTouch 4 for years I learned that when the sync transfers purchases from the phone it 'replaces' the file instead of moving the old 1 to the trash).
    Some of these apps I have purchased, & by forcing the update to remove the old version Apple is essentially taking something I have purchased & saying I am no longer allowed to use it.
    Just in the what 3 months since the new iOS came out I have noticed that now over half of the apps can't be run on my iPod Touch 4G.
    It's simple, iTunes should either:
    Keep a record of the devices that have synced (I know, it already does) & keep the newest version for the lated iOS in iTunes
    Let users have multiple versions of the same app in iTunes & allow us to disable update checks for certain apps
    Allow users to choose to download from iTunes the different versions of the apps available from the developer
    OR
    Allow users to edit the info on Apps, unlinking them from their original & updates & allowing users to keep an old version & still download a new 1

  • Multiple versions of the same Web Dynpro application on the same SAP Portal

    I have a single application (local development) and deploy directly to a SAP Portal(NW 7.0) from NWDS Version: 7.0.15
    No problems there, works like a charm.
    But I want to have multiple versions of the same application on one portal. Eg. ill build a version 1.0 for test and deploy this. Then continue to work on version 1.1 deploying this directly on the portal. The two versions should now co-existing under different names and/or packages.
    Please help.

    Hi Kim,
    May be you can try this and see if this works for you. I am not 100% sure if it will work for you, but worth a try I guess. Create a Test WebDynpro project and try the following steps on this project. If they work  out correctly and serve the purpose for you only then try them on your actual Web Dynpro project.
    1. Create a test Web Dynpro project  say "TestWDProject" with Component say "Comp1" and the default views and windows etc.
    Also create some working application our of this component and Windows using the Context.
    2. Right click the "Comp1" and select Copy.
    3. Right click 'Components" node in the project structure and select "Paste"
    4.This step will try to paste the copy of Comp1 as a new Component.
    5. You can change the Name and Package of the Component.
    6.Similarly you'll get the prompts for views,windows etc.
    7.Once you have copied everything, Just check if everything looks good.
    8.Now you can create a new Application using this new component and the Component Interface View and Deploy it.
    9.Test whether the Application created out of this copy works same as the original component.
    You can also try to create another Web Dynpro project and paste the Comp1 in the Components node of that new project and perform the same steps.
    Again, try with these Test Projects and see if this serves your purpose before applying the steps on actual projects.
    Regards,
    Ajay

  • Solaris 11 IPS:  How do you post multiple versions of the same package?

    How do you post multiple versions of the same software package on a single IPS instance(port)? Oracle was able to do it here with versions 151 and 175 of S11:
    http://pkg.oracle.com/solaris/release/
    Unfortunately, based on my searches, no where in the documentation (http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/server-storage/solaris11/technologies/ips-323421.html) does it explain to the development community how this is done. The best I can do is create pkg repo instances on different ports to host each different software version.
    We are trying to deploy an IPS repository for our drivers and utilities that our customers can link to and pull updates from. We have been able to post a software package to the repository using the command:
    pkgsend publish -s http://localhost:1234 -d ./ Appv1.p5m
    This posts the package on the IPS repository instance at port 1234 on the server. However, we would like to post multiple versions of the package on the server at the same URL. Why the same URL? So that our customers and end-users need only point to a single URL to pull down our software rather than having to add a new URL to the publisher list each time we have an update. We want at least 5 of the previous software versions to be available on the server. Posting each version of the application or driver on a different IPS instance on a different port will require customers to add multiple URLs to their publisher list and they also will not be able to initiate remote scans for updates.
    Has anybody been able to do this? Is any documentation forthcoming?
    Edited by: user13489824 on Jun 25, 2012 10:17 AM

    dhduvall: Thanks for your response. Yes, one would think that as long as the version numbers are different, you should be able to accumulate multiple versions of a package in a repository. It looks like Oracle has done it in their S11 repository unfortunately, as far as I know, they have not shared the steps on how to do this. I would like to publish two versions of the same package. I.E. two different manifests with two different fmri.pkg version strings and two different binaries.
    If I publish one package after another like this:
    pkgsend publish -s http://localhost:1234 Appv1.p5m
    pkgsend publish -s http://localhost:1234 Appv2.p5m
    Then only the second package shows up in the repository, as if it over-wrote the first one.
    Running pkgsend with two manifest, like this:
    pkgsend publish -s http://localhost:1234 Appv1.p5m Appv2.p5m
    Will cause pkgsend to combine the packages and manifests as if they were a single package... not what I am trying to do.
    Both approaches are complete without errors but neither achieves what I am trying to do.
    alan.pae: Thank you. Unfortunately, the link didn't really help. I've read Oracle's white papers and IPS developer guide so I'm familiar with the topics covered.
    Lex: Yes, I know. I specified the versions in the pkg.fmri value string.

  • Multiple versions of the same RAW image

    Hi All,
    It's posible to have multiple versions of the same RAW file. Let's say I work my RAW file and make some changes, can those changes become an independent file? I want to be able to go back to the original RAW file without loosing any other version already created.
    Best regards,
    Jose

    Hi Kim,
    May be you can try this and see if this works for you. I am not 100% sure if it will work for you, but worth a try I guess. Create a Test WebDynpro project and try the following steps on this project. If they work  out correctly and serve the purpose for you only then try them on your actual Web Dynpro project.
    1. Create a test Web Dynpro project  say "TestWDProject" with Component say "Comp1" and the default views and windows etc.
    Also create some working application our of this component and Windows using the Context.
    2. Right click the "Comp1" and select Copy.
    3. Right click 'Components" node in the project structure and select "Paste"
    4.This step will try to paste the copy of Comp1 as a new Component.
    5. You can change the Name and Package of the Component.
    6.Similarly you'll get the prompts for views,windows etc.
    7.Once you have copied everything, Just check if everything looks good.
    8.Now you can create a new Application using this new component and the Component Interface View and Deploy it.
    9.Test whether the Application created out of this copy works same as the original component.
    You can also try to create another Web Dynpro project and paste the Comp1 in the Components node of that new project and perform the same steps.
    Again, try with these Test Projects and see if this serves your purpose before applying the steps on actual projects.
    Regards,
    Ajay

  • Problem with multiple versions of documents being published with 001, 002, etc.

    I am using Contribute CS3. I am having a problem with multiple versions of documents being published on the sever with 001, 002, etc in the name. So that I end up with 2 or 3 versions of a document on the server. Does anyone know why / how Contribute  is doing this? Thanks for any help you can give.

    Your Web site administrator will need to update your key to allow you to delete files you are able to edit.

  • Search in Mail yields multiple versions of the same email

    I wasn't able to find any other postings on this, but this has been bugging me for a while now . . . just not big enough of a deal to do anything about. Whenever I do a search in Mail, the results give me multiple versions of the same email, in different stages of completeness. Is there some setting that I have inadvertently turned on that keeps back ups of my draft emails every few seconds? Anyone else have this annoying problem?

    I too am having this problem. Doesn't seem to happen all the time though. No rhyme nor reason ? I am using an IMAP account if this helps ?
    Message was edited by: Visioneer

  • How to delete multiple versions of the same song file?

    I recently moved my iTunes music file to an external hard drive, and for some reason, it took iTunes a few tries before it recognized the new location of my music (I had to change the location in the preferences a few times because it kept changing itself back...?) So I ended up with those infamous exclamation points next to all of my songs because iTunes couldn't find any of the files.
    I ended up just deleting my entire library and re-adding it to try and solve the problem, but somehow, in the process, iTunes made (sometimes multiple) copies of almost everything. The weirdest part of this is that most of the albums have 3 copies of everything, a few have four (?!), and some did not get copied at all.
    There has to be an easy way to consolidate and delete mutiple versions of the same file, but how? I have tried everything I can think of. The "consolidate library" function tells me it is going to copy everything again (how is that "consolidating"?)
    I have 15GB of music and do not want to go through and delete thousands of songs manually.
    HELP!

    This doesn't quite work as it displays all of the tracks that have been duplicated, including the originals, meaning I would delete all of the copies and no longer have those songs, or still have to go in manually for everything.
    I also tried displaying the date added for everything, hoping iTunes had made the copies on different days, but everything was added and copied on the same day, so I wasn't able to differentiate the files that way, either.
    HELP!

  • How do I have multiple versions of the same .chm?

    Our developers recently were required to make changes to an earlier version of our software (thank goodness for backups). So I'm having to revert to that earlier version, make changes, and create a revised .chm. HOWEVER, I already had completed the upcoming release's .chm and don't want to lose all of those changes. To make matters more complicated, I also have requests for changes to the Help for the future release.
    So, how does everyone have multiple versions of the .chm on their system at the same time and keep them separate, yet compile the right files with the right version? I had thought I could just create a new folder with the files that changed for the various versions, but updating them in Word 2007 is not a pretty proposition. I'll then have to import them in and replace the "old" ones. There has to be an easier way! I'm sure other people do this on a regular basis, but this is the first time I've had to go back a version, maintain the next version, and start work on a yet-to-be-released version all at the same time.

    It never ceases to amaze me how questions on the forum are like buses, none for an hour then three come along. Not your fault but this was asked just a couple of days ago.
    When your developers issue a new version you need to save a copy of the source, we just zip it up. Then you carry on editing for the next version and zip that up and go again.
    Then when a change is required to an older version, you dig it up, amend it and zip it again.
    Not sure how it works with source control. The above is easier and reliable, assuming you manage it tightly.
    See www.grainge.org for RoboHelp and Authoring tips

  • Lightroom CC issues with multiple export at the same time

    Back before Lightroom updated to the CC version, I was able to use export presets to send 4 different versions of the photos I'm working on at the same time (A Full Size for client at certain size, full size for myself, web-sized with watermark and a thumbnail). Since updating to the CC version, I'm only able to start the export process on two of these versions before the system simply becomes crippled and I cannot even navigate through Lightroom without it chugging along.
    For reference, I'm running a 2014 rMBP with 16GB of RAM, LR is the only app open at the time and it's showing that I have roughly 6GB of RAM free when attempting this export.
    TL;DR: LR5 worked wiht multiple exports at the same time, but LRCC now chugs after 2 exports are started

    Re: "Selecting video in Messages, now starts Face time for video. Face time is one to one only."
    Apple "Messages" supports two different types of video conferencing. It's become more than a little confusing. If you (or the person on the other end) ONLY have accounts set up for Apple's "iMessage" service (associated with your Apple ID and "iCloud") you may see the video symbol, but when you click on it you will be connected via FaceTime which is limited a 1-to-1 video conference.
    However, if you have set up an AIM account in Messages (you may already have an AIM account ID if you once used iChat for video, audio and screensharing) and the person at the other end also has an AIM account you will be connected via AIM and will be able to do screen sharing and multi-person video conferences just like the old iChat, i.e. you'll have iChat Theater features, up to 4-way conferencing, etc.
    It can get very confusing if, for example, you've signed up for AIM using a .me or .cloud email address. But once you have it set up and learn to recognise the way Messages switches between AIM and iMessage all the old iChat features work just fine in Messages.

  • Why is my mac syncing multiple version of the same song?

    I wonder if anyone could help with this:
    My sync takes so long sometimes and it often syncs 2 or 3 versions of the same song on loads of albums.
    I have to go through manually one by one and delete them off my phone, and sometimes i only stumble across duplicates by accident.
    Its very frustrating.
    Im on OSX 10.9.2 with an iPhone 5s running the latest version of iOS.
    Thanks.

    eek that sounds unpleasant. Are the songs different in any way?
    Are these albums using playlists to sync?
    If so…check that the the playlists on the Mac don't have the duplicate copies - in this case the same file will be reused (not using extra space on the device).
    Do they show as multiple files in iOS's Albums view? You may need to tap 'More…' and then 'Edit' to add the 'albums tab' to the bottom menu. Save and check for duplicates.
    I'd reboot everything, backup the device to iTunes, disable music syncing to empty the device and resync to see if that helps, if it fails consider resetting the iPhone. http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1414
    Try another sync. If that is OK restore the backup & see if it comes back.

  • Why am I getting multiple versions of the same page showing in the Back (and Forward) buttons?

    I had this problem with Firefox 4.x -- and I just upgraded to FF5, but the issue still exists.
    What happens is, when I've surfed to more than one page (or site) on a tab, then want to go back, I find that my Back button history often has multiple versions of the most recent page loaded, so that when I press the Back button once, it does nothing. Instead, I have to hold the button to display all of that tab's recent history, in order to return to the page that immediately preceded the current page.
    Could this be an issue with a plugin, that's loading the page multiple times, or something? It's certainly an annoyance.
    Thanks in advance for any assistance you may be able to provide!

    Yeah, it's keeping all the history -- better than deleting it, I suppose -- but I'd rather not have to hit that button numerous times.
    Here's an example -- I just tried this moments ago.
    * I just opened a new tab.
    * Typed imdb.com in the address bar.
    * Clicked on a NewsDesk story: Jon Hamm Locks In 'Mad Men' for 3 Years
    URL: http://www.imdb.com/news/ni11982605/
    * Then clicked on Jon Hamm's name.
    URL: http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0358316/
    (And come to think of it, IMDb seems to be where I notice this happening the most frequently.)
    So the back button just reloads the Jon Hamm profile page again, and ditto when I finally page back to the news story page (takes me two clicks of the back button to go to the page before it).
    Odd thing, when I repeated this process -- without opening a new tab -- now I have FOUR of the news story pages in the drop down from the Back/Forward buttons, but TWO of the Jon Hamm profile pages.
    Ah, here's an interesting thing -- every time I go to a new page (Hamm's bio, for instance), then go back, there is suddenly one more instance of the previous page.
    I've seen literally DOZENS of instances of one page loaded up in this Back/Forward drop-down history. Not the ideal situation, obviously. ;-)
    See screen capture below, if that helps.
    Thanks again!

Maybe you are looking for