Problem with multirecord block

Hi every one
I have multirecord block in form conten 2 textitem A & B
and i have checkbox .
i need when i check the checkbox set instance item A Enable and item B Disable
and vice versa
the problem is when i check the checkbox all instance of item enable or disable
but i want that instance what I foucs on .

You can't disable/enable an individual instance of a multi-record item.
What you CAN do is use SET_ITEM_INSTANCE_PROPERTY to set INSERT_ALLOWED, UPDATE_ALLOWED and VISUAL_ATTRIBUTE. To disable, set up a visual attribute that mimics a disabled field, and set INSERT_ALLOWED and UPDATE_ALLOWED to false. If you don't want them to be able to click or tab the cursor into the field create a pre-text-item trigger on the items that checks the value of the checkbox and raises form_trigger_failure if this field should be disabled.

Similar Messages

Problems with file block settings

We manage file block settings via group policy. I have run into problems with the file block settings not working as advertised.
I've run into a couple of issues:
First, in Excel 2010 I would like to open Web Page and XML files in protected view rather than blocking entirely. Our "Set Default File Block Behavior" in the GPO is set to "Blocked Files are not opened." According to the
documentation, the settings for individual file types should be able to override this behavior but this is not the case in my testing. If I set "Web pages and Excel 2003 XML spreadsheets" to "Allow editing and Open in Protected View"
the files are still blocked and the Trust Center list the file as Do not open, not the GPO setting of open in protected view. I have verified via GPresults that the GPO applied successfully, rebooted the PC, etc. The "Set Default File Block
Behavior" is NOT overridden by individual file type settings.
According to the "plan file block settings" technet article:
The “Set default file block behavior” setting specifies how blocked files open (for example: does not open, opens in protected view, or opens in protected view but can be edited). If you enable this setting, the default file block behavior you specify applies
to any file format that users block in the Trust Center UI. It also applies to a specific file format only if you both enable its file format setting (for more information about individual file format settings, see the tables in this article) and select the
Open/Save blocked, use open policy option. Otherwise, if you configure an individual file format setting, it overrides the
Set default file block behavior setting configuration for that file type.
Second, even if I do change the set default file block behavior to open in protected view, I still cannot open XML spreadsheets. The trust center says that the file format is set to open in protected view but when I attempt to open a file it behaves
as if the setting was still set to block entirely.
The only thing that works is setting it to "do not block" which is not where I'd like to go - I would for security reasons like these types of files to open in protected view but there doesn't seem to be any way to do this contrary to the Technet
documentation.

Hi,
I had opened a case at Microsoft in 2012 about the «Open/Save Block, use open policy» parameter about HTM/HMTL files... Here is the answer I got from the support.
Hope it will help
Thank you for contacting Microsoft regarding your recent Office 2010 Hotfix request (SR 112022071246968) in reference to File Block settings on web pages. We have conducted a thorough investigation into this matter
and while we recognize the impact the issue is having on your business, we cannot accept this Hotfix request because it is acting as designed.<u5:p></u5:p>
Office will block any files that are explicitly set in the File Block UI by an Administrator when there is no built in validator. The Office File Validation scans and validates certain kinds of files and will
only display those applicable files in Protected View. We could provide a safe experience in Protected View for HTM, but it wouldn't be a useful experience. Linked content of the web page is not available (images, stylesheets, javascript, etc), so the
user would effectively see plain text. This is not the experience we want in Protected View, and it would encourage users to leave Protected View, putting their machine at risk. So HTM/HTML files are blocked.<u5:p></u5:p>
<u5:p></u5:p>

Problem with DECODE block in WHERE clause

Hi,
I'm facing problem with DECODE statement. I just simulated my problem in the simple way as follows. If I execute this following query, I should get "hello", but I'm not getting anything (ZERO rows returned).
SELECT 'hello' FROM DUAL
WHERE 'sample1' in (DECODE(1, 1, '''sample1'', ''sample2'', ''sample3''',
2, '''sample4'', ''sample5'', ''sample6'''
I think some problem is there in my WHERE clause.
But When I'm exeucting the following query as a seperate query, then I'm getting the value of DECODE block properly, but didn;t understnad why its not returning the same way when I'm putting the same DECODE statement in WHERE clause.
SELECT DECODE(1, 1, '''sample1'', ''sample2'', ''sample3''',
2, '''sample4'', ''sample5'', ''sample6'''
FROM DUAL;
Please help me to get out of this problem. Thank you so much in advance.
Thanks,
Ramji.

The value returned by SELECT DECODE(1, 1, '''sample1'', ''sample2'', ''sample3''',2, '''sample4'', ''sample5'', ''sample6''') FROM DUAL;
'sample1', 'sample2', 'sample3' is a single string. Consider it x.
SELECT 'hello' FROM DUAL WHERE 'sample1' in ( DECODE(1, 1, '''sample1'', ''sample2'', ''sample3''',2, '''sample4'', ''sample5'', ''sample6'''));
is like SELECT 'hello' FROM DUAL WHERE 'sample1' in ('x');
or
SELECT 'hello' FROM DUAL WHERE 'sample1' in ('''sample1'', ''sample2'', ''sample3''') and not
SELECT 'hello' FROM DUAL WHERE 'sample1' in ('sample1', 'sample2', 'sample3');
For this same reason SELECT 'hello' FROM DUAL WHERE 'sample1' in (select '''sample1'', ''sample2'', ''sample3''' from dual);
also does'nt work.
Please use INSTR to find whether 'sample1' exists in the string 'sample1', 'sample2', 'sample3'.

Problem with ParForEach Block

Hi, Gurus.
i have a strange problem with blocks (parallel processing).
My Wf contain of:
1. Dialog step, where user choose actors.
2. parallel block for actors, the first step in the block - no-dialog step for getting instance of actor object.
When I test this WF, and choose more than 5 actors, the parallel processing not working,
all non-dialog task for each actor are in READY state, and not processing.
But when I delete dialog step and set actors manually, its working fine, and when I chosee less than 5 actors, it's working.
I check mapping, everything ok. Thank you for advise.
Regards,
Oleg.

Thank you for your reply.
I have no rule in this Workflow, the processor of first dialog step is wf_initiator.
This step base on standard method - WF_TASK.DISPATCH.
Initiator chooses actor's (in my case it's org. units) and the table seem's like:
O 01000000
O 02000000
O 03000000
Then, I try to make paralllel steps for each line of this table. In WF Log, I see that parallel blocks is created,
but the first step in this blocks (it's no-dialog step to generate instance of orgunit object), is in ready state (the line (object key) is transfer to this step, and the instance is not generated). As I said, when I delete the step with agent chose, and fill this table manually, its working fine...

Problem with ForEach block in BPM

Hi,
I have a scenario as follows:
Collecting Idocs and send them separately via file channel (Does not make so much sense but I want to get used using the forEach Block)
Loop (as long as "control" != false)
Fork
1. branch: Wait step 1 minute and container operation assign "control" = false (if no more idoc is received, loop stops after 1 minute)
2. branch: receive step with correlation, container operation with append to multiline message, container operation assign "control" = true
Mapping
multiline message to single line message (same interface)
ForEach Block
Send Step with single line message
My problem:
x idocs get collected by the BPM and my file channel posts x idocs to the directory but it is always the same idoc and not x different ones.
Any idea on that?
Regards.
Oliver.

Yes, that's the blog I used.
I have used the same interface for Send/Receive Steps, the Multi-Line Element and the Current Line Element. I restricted the Current Line Element to the block. Any other definition would not show up in the dropdown list, anyway.
These are my settings for the Block:
Step Name: Block1
Description: [Blank]
Mode: ForEach
MultiLine Element: Idoc_Multi
CurrentLine: Idoc_Local
End Condition, Exceptions and Local Correlations: [Blank]
Here are the settings for the Send Step:
Step Name: Send1
Description: [Blank]
Mode: Asynchronous
Create New transaction: [Not marked]
Message: Idoc
Ack: None
Receiver from: Send Context
All others: [Blank]
I don't see any error?
Regards.
Oliver.

Problem with variant block

Hi everibody
I am nephiew with labview and i am trying to use "to variant" block.
In the atteachment there is a picture of my VI.
Where am i wrong?!
Best regards
Giovanni
Attachments:
variant.png ‏39 KB

You are right but the problem is more complex.
This is only a short vi.
I am communicating with a PLC and to do that i have used a .NET library.
The problem is that the library gives me some data from the plc in a To string variable. See the atteachment.
Trhough the variable datatype i select the corrisponding case. In the case of boolean is not a metter. In the case of an int16 i don't know how i can do. I would like to make a different thing for all type of variables...
is it clear?!
in the atteachment there is the vi and two screenshot of it.
Attachments:
variant2.png ‏14 KB
variant.png ‏11 KB
Untitled 2.vi ‏33 KB

Problem with plsql block

Hello All,
I have a sql query which i am trying to put it in plsql block.It throws me an error saying i cannot have group function as my two select strings gives me more than one row. How to tackle this??
declare
uuid varchar;
stat_date date;
begin
select 'I'||Lower(docfamily_uuid) into uuid, max(status_date) into stat_date from document_status where status_code=303 or status_code=305 group by docfamily_uuid;
end;
Thanks

In addition to being mal-formed it is likely your problem stems from the fact that your query is returning more than one row. Now perhaps you are expecting only one row and your GROUP BY might be getting in the way. Try changing your GROUP BY to include the LOWER function that is in your SELECT statement. But realize that this in itself will not guarentee one row returning from the SELECT statement.
WITH document_status AS
SELECT 'xxx' docfamily_uuid, sysdate status_date, 303 status_code from dual
UNION ALL
SELECT 'XXX' docfamily_uuid, sysdate status_date, 303 status_code from dual
SELECT 'I'||Lower(docfamily_uuid), max(status_date)
FROM   document_status
WHERE status_code=303 or status_code=305
GROUP BY docfamily_uuid;
Ixxx     05-FEB-09
Ixxx     05-FEB-09
WITH document_status AS
SELECT 'xxx' docfamily_uuid, sysdate status_date, 303 status_code from dual
UNION ALL
SELECT 'XXX' docfamily_uuid, sysdate status_date, 303 status_code from dual
SELECT 'I'||Lower(docfamily_uuid), max(status_date)
FROM   document_status
WHERE status_code=303 or status_code=305
GROUP BY LOWER(docfamily_uuid);
Ixxx     05-FEB-09Greg

Repaint() - problems with queueing/blocking

hello,
im writing a game as an applet using awt, but i cant get the repaint() method to execute where i would want it to.
import java.applet.* ;
import java.awt.* ;
import java.awt.event.* ;     //depreciated
import java.util.* ;
public class matches_applet     extends Applet
                    implements ActionListener , MouseListener , ItemListener {
     // var declarations
     // init
     // reinit for starting new game
     // waiter for simulating "thinking"
     public void move( int srcX , int srcY , int destX , int destY ) {
          //check if vaild move...
               // mode : 1 = single player , 2 = mulitplayer
               // player: 1 = human , 2 = human/computer
               if (mode == 1 && player == 1 ) {
                    waiter() ;     //simulate computer player "thinking"
               //add move to list of done moves...
               System.out.println("repaint attempt");
               try {
                    Thread.currentThread().sleep(2000);
                    field.repaint();
                    Thread.currentThread().sleep(2000);
               } catch ( Exception e ) {}
               System.out.println("repaint succsessful");
               if (mode == 1 && player == -1 ) {
                    //send human move to ai...
                    //receive ai move
                    //write ai move to vars fromX , fromY , toX , toY
                    move( fromX , fromY , toX , toY ) ;
     // listeners
     // move invoked from mouseClicked( MouseEvent mouse ){}
     public class CentrePanel extends Canvas {
          @Override
          public void paint( Graphics g ) {
               System.out.println("repaint in");
               // paint stuff
               System.out.println("repaint out");
}now when i attempt to move a pawn, my console prints :
     repaint attempt
     repaint succsessful
     repaint attempt
     repaint succsessful
     repaint in
     repaint out
for the part inside the move.
insted it should print ( correct me if im wrong ) :
     repaint attempt
     repaint in
     repaint out
     repaint succsessful
     repaint attempt
     repaint in
     repaint out
     repaint succsessful
i know that the
if (mode == 1 && player == -1 ) {...}is blocking the queue, but i dont know how to get it not to.
thx for any answers in advance,
westernmagic
Edited by: westernmagic on Feb 1, 2009 5:36 AM

Pete_Kirkham wrote:
An alternative approach is to bypass the event queue and call paint directly with the components Graphics object whilst in the loop.
Pete[http://forums-beta.sun.com/thread.jspa?messageID=2065345]
thanks Pete.
@ admin/mod : feel free to close.
Edited by: westernmagic on Feb 1, 2009 1:26 PM

Problem with CVI blocking UART Callback

Hi,
I have been using LabWindows CVI 9.0 since a few years now and I have seen a problem that didn't blocked me until now.
My LabWindows Software freezes, the code is no longer executed, when I hold a click on the interface, on a string for example.
The problem is that I use a device that emits data continuously on a COM port. When I decide to drag the software window or simply hold a left click on the interace the software stop acquiring data from the COM callback and my software misses data.
Do you have a solution for this problem ?
Thank you

HI Penou,
In fact it is a good idea using multiple Threads to avoid this kind of behavior.
Maybe you are using ProcessSystemEvents to handle events, on the same main thread.
If it is the case, when ProcessSystemEvents handles an event that starts a tracking loop, such as the user pulling down a menu, ProcessSystemEvents does not return until the tracking loop completes. In the case of pulling down a menu, the tracking loop does not complete until the user dismisses the menu.
You have several inforrmations about ProcessSystemEvents here.
Regards,
Rémi D.
National Instruments France
#adMrkt{text-align: center;font-size:11px; font-weight: bold;} #adMrkt a {text-decoration: none;} #adMrkt a:hover{font-size: 9px;} #adMrkt a span{display: none;} #adMrkt a:hover span{display: block;}
>> Les rencontres techniques de NI - Mesures et acquisition de données : de la théorie à la mise en ...

Problem with coding blocks

Dear All,
I am doing a BDC for a particular transaction. The BDC program defaults some values. The problem is , at a particular screen the coding blocks screen was popping up..I did n't code this coding block screen..I want to supress that coding block screen. Client does n't wants the coding blocks screen.. Can some one help me to supress these coding blocks...
Thanks in advance,
King.

BDC behave differently in background, so where ever coding block page comes out just key-in enter, you cannot surpress this value.
Ex: BDC_OKCODE "=ENTE"
It will solve your problem.
Reward points if useful.
Regards,
SaiRam

Problem with slide block puzzle

Hello:
I am doing a project that solve slide-block puzzles. My program take two common line arguments. One is a file specifying the initial configuration while the other specify goal configuration. My idea is to use an arrayList<block > to represent a configuration with each element being a block, for each block, I stores all possible configurations after moving the block in a Hashset and Stack. I check if the goal has been reached after each move, if not, go moving next one. If the configuration has been seen before, which indicates a dead end, I pop the stack to backtrack the most recent the branch and take another path.
Unfortunately, the algorithm I came up does not work.
Can anyone propose a psudocode for me?
Also, my program should print out all moves directly towards the goal but I can not figure out how to only print out the moves directly towards the goal and avoid printing those leading to dead end.
You can see specification http://nifty.stanford.edu/2007/clancy-slidingblocks/proj3.html.
I will be really really appreciated.

Well, that was harder than I thought!
Anyway, the algorithm can be quite simple: a BFS finds a solution pretty fast. Here's some pseudo code:
public class Solver {
    private Set<Integer> alreadyFormedTrays; // A set of already formed trays
    private List<Block> goalList;            // The final goal(s)
    private boolean foundSolution = false; // A flag flipped to true once we find a solution
    private Tray startTray;                  // The initial tray
    public Solver(String[] tray, String[] goals) {
        alreadyFormedTrays = new HashSet<Integer>();
        goalList = new ArrayList<Block>();
        buildTray(tray);
        buildGoals(goals);
    private void buildGoals(String[] goalsData) {
        // Fill the 'goalList'.
    private void buildTray(String[] trayData) {
        // Create the first tray: 'startTray'.
    private boolean goalsReached(Tray aTray) {
        // Check wether we have reached our goal(s).
    public void solve() {
        alreadyFormedTrays.add(startTray.hashCode());
        System.out.println("START=\n"+startTray);
        solve(startTray);
    private void solve(Tray aTray) {
        IF we found a solution, stop looping END IF
        IF 'aTray' reached our goal(s)
            foundSolution <- true
            print the path 'aTray' has taken
            stop looping
        END IF
        'nextTrays' <- all next trays that can be formed from 'aTray'
        FOR every Tray 'T' in 'nextTrays' DO
            'hash' <- a hash of 'T'
            IF 'hash' is not yet present in 'alreadyFormedTrays'
                add 'hash' in 'alreadyFormedTrays'
                make a recursively call with 'T' as a parameter
            ENDIF
        ENDFOR
    public static void main(String[] args) {
        String[] trayFile = {
                "5 4",
                "2 1 0 0",
                "2 1 0 3",
                "2 1 2 0",
                "2 1 2 3",
                "2 2 1 1",
                "1 2 3 1",
                "1 1 4 0",
                "1 1 4 1",
                "1 1 4 2",
                "1 1 4 3"
        String[] goalFile = {
                "2 2 3 1"
        Solver s = new Solver(trayFile, goalFile);
        s.solve();
}As I said: the algorithm isn't that hard, the tricky part comes in finding all possible Trays from a given Tray X and making copies based on X.
Here are some UML diagrams of the classes I used:
|                                      |
| + Tray                               |
|______________________________________|
|                                      |
| ROWS: int                            |
| COLUMNS: int                         |
| - freeSpaces: byte[][]               |
| blocks: List<Block>                  |
| path: List<Atom[]>                   |
|______________________________________|
|                                      |
| + Tray(r: int, c: int): << constr >> |
| + Tray(tray: Tray): << constr >>     |
| + addBlock(b: Block): boolean        |
| + generateNextTrays(): List<Tray>    |
| + removeBlock(b: Block): void        |
|______________________________________|
|                                                                                          |
| + Block                                                                                  |
|__________________________________________________________________________________________|
|                                                                                          |
| HEIGHT: int                                                                              |
| WIDTH: int                                                                               |
| name: char                                                                               |
| atoms: List<Atom>                                                                        |
|__________________________________________________________________________________________|
|                                                                                          |
| + Block(n: char, height: int, width: int, startRow: int, startColumn: int): << constr >> |
| + Block(b: Block): << constr >>                                                          |
| - buildAtoms(startRow: int, startColumn: int): void                                      |
| + getUpperLeft(): Atom                                                                   |
| + move(m: Move): void                                                                    |
|__________________________________________________________________________________________|
|                                      |
| + Atom                               |
|______________________________________|
|                                      |
| row: int                             |
| column: int                          |
|______________________________________|
|                                      |
| + Atom(r: int, c: int): << constr >> |
| + Atom(a: Atom): << constr >>        |
| + move(m: Move): void                |
|______________________________________|I removed the equals(...), hashCode() and toString() methods for clarity, you should implement them, of course.
The Move class you see in there is an enum, and looks like this:
public enum Move {
    UP    (-1, 0),
    RIGHT ( 0, 1),
    DOWN ( 1, 0),
    LEFT ( 0, -1);
    final int deltaRow, deltaColumn;
    private Move(int dr, int dc) {
        deltaRow = dr;
        deltaColumn = dc;
}If you have any questions about the methods/variables in the class diagrams, feel free to post back.
Good luck.

Problem with payment block code in MIRO

Hi experts,
I've a problem during invoice verification, the system doesn't set the payment block code R -Invoice verification but another payment block code and in this way the transaction MRBR doesn't show the invoice blocked.
Is there in customizing an option for setting a specify payment code block for a company code?
I've verified the OMR6 and OMR9, but the problem not solved.
Thanks.
Best regards,
Gaetano

You can Block the invoice by
1. By defining the Block in payment terms
2. By setting tolerance limits in OMR6 trxn
3. and using Stochostic Block

Problem with creating blocks

Hi,I place in an outline a simple formula: a = 100 and calculate database, Essbase doesn't create new blocks. The member 'a' is in the sparse dimension. I've marked "Create Blocks on Equations" option of course. The same problem I had on the other machine. I had to reinstall Essbase to get properly calculations.Anyone knows what is the reason of.Essbase 6.51, w2k sp2.ThanksAdam

Just to be sure - is the formula a=100 on the "a" member? Also, are you running the default calc, or a custom script? If you are running the default calc, try creating a calc script as follows:SET UPDATECALC OFF;CALC ALL;This will ensure that Intelligent Calc is not preventing the blocks from being created.Regards,Jade-----------------------------------Jade ColeSenior Business Intelligence ConsultantClarity [email protected]

What is the problem with this block

i create atable with one column a write ablock to insert the numbers 1 to 10 except 6,8
but this block insert all values even 6,8 so why my condition does not work
this is the block:
declare
i number :=1;
begin
while (i<=10) and (i!=6 or i!=8) loop
insert into work (result) values(i);
i:= i+1;
end loop;
end;

test@ora>
test@ora>
test@ora> --
test@ora> set serveroutput on size 1000000
test@ora> declare
2    i number :=1;
3 begin
4    while (i<=10) and (i!=6 or i!=8) loop
5      dbms_output.put_line('i = '||i);
6      i:= i+1;
7    end loop;
8 end;
9 /
i = 1
i = 2
i = 3
i = 4
i = 5
i = 6
i = 7
i = 8
i = 9
i = 10
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
test@ora>
test@ora>
test@ora> --
test@ora> set serveroutput on size 1000000
test@ora> declare
2    i number :=1;
3 begin
4    while (i<=10) loop
5      if (i!=6 and i!=8) then
6        dbms_output.put_line('i = '||i);
7      end if;
8      i:= i+1;
9    end loop;
10 end;
11 /
i = 1
i = 2
i = 3
i = 4
i = 5
i = 7
i = 9
i = 10
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
test@ora>
test@ora>
test@ora>isotope

Problem with Synchronized block

Hi,
For me synchronized key word is not working (?) :-(
Here is the example :
I have three classes
package sample.test;
public class TestThreadMain {
     public static void main(String[] args) {
          Thread t1 = new ThreadOne();
          Thread t3 = new ThreadOne();
          t1.start();
          t3.start();
public class TestThread {
     int k = 0;
     public synchronized void method1(){
          System.out.println("Entered into method1 >>>>>>>>>");
          for (int i=0; i<1000; i++){
               for (int j=0; j<100000; j++){
                    k = j * 12345;
               System.out.println("method1 i value is "+i);
package sample.test;
public class ThreadOne extends Thread {
     TestThread t1 = new TestThread();
     public void run() {
               t1.method1();
If I run "TestThreadMain" class output is
Entered into method1 >>>>>>>>>
method1 i value is 0
method1 i value is 1
method1 i value is 2
method1 i value is 3
method1 i value is 4
method1 i value is 5
method1 i value is 6
method1 i value is 7
method1 i value is 8
method1 i value is 9
method1 i value is 10
method1 i value is 11
method1 i value is 12
method1 i value is 13
method1 i value is 14
method1 i value is 15
method1 i value is 16
method1 i value is 17
method1 i value is 18
method1 i value is 19
method1 i value is 20
method1 i value is 21
method1 i value is 22
method1 i value is 23
method1 i value is 24
method1 i value is 25
method1 i value is 26
method1 i value is 27
method1 i value is 28
method1 i value is 29
method1 i value is 30
method1 i value is 31
method1 i value is 32
method1 i value is 33
method1 i value is 34
method1 i value is 35
method1 i value is 36
method1 i value is 37
method1 i value is 38
method1 i value is 39
method1 i value is 40
method1 i value is 41
method1 i value is 42
method1 i value is 43
method1 i value is 44
method1 i value is 45
method1 i value is 46
method1 i value is 47
method1 i value is 48
method1 i value is 49
method1 i value is 50
method1 i value is 51
method1 i value is 52
method1 i value is 53
method1 i value is 54
method1 i value is 55
method1 i value is 56
method1 i value is 57
method1 i value is 58
method1 i value is 59
method1 i value is 60
method1 i value is 61
method1 i value is 62
method1 i value is 63
method1 i value is 64
method1 i value is 65
method1 i value is 66
method1 i value is 67
method1 i value is 68
method1 i value is 69
method1 i value is 70
method1 i value is 71
method1 i value is 72
method1 i value is 73
method1 i value is 74
method1 i value is 75
method1 i value is 76
method1 i value is 77
method1 i value is 78
method1 i value is 79
method1 i value is 80
method1 i value is 81
method1 i value is 82
method1 i value is 83
method1 i value is 84
method1 i value is 85
method1 i value is 86
method1 i value is 87
method1 i value is 88
method1 i value is 89
method1 i value is 90
method1 i value is 91
method1 i value is 92
method1 i value is 93
method1 i value is 94
method1 i value is 95
method1 i value is 96
method1 i value is 97
method1 i value is 98
method1 i value is 99
method1 i value is 100
method1 i value is 101
method1 i value is 102
method1 i value is 103
method1 i value is 104
method1 i value is 105
method1 i value is 106
method1 i value is 107
method1 i value is 108
method1 i value is 109
method1 i value is 110
method1 i value is 111
method1 i value is 112
method1 i value is 113
method1 i value is 114
method1 i value is 115
method1 i value is 116
method1 i value is 117
method1 i value is 118
method1 i value is 119
method1 i value is 120
method1 i value is 121
method1 i value is 122
method1 i value is 123
method1 i value is 124
method1 i value is 125
method1 i value is 126
method1 i value is 127
method1 i value is 128
method1 i value is 129
method1 i value is 130
method1 i value is 131
method1 i value is 132
method1 i value is 133
method1 i value is 134
method1 i value is 135
method1 i value is 136
method1 i value is 137
method1 i value is 138
method1 i value is 139
method1 i value is 140
method1 i value is 141
method1 i value is 142
method1 i value is 143
method1 i value is 144
method1 i value is 145
method1 i value is 146
method1 i value is 147
method1 i value is 148
method1 i value is 149
method1 i value is 150
method1 i value is 151
method1 i value is 152
method1 i value is 153
method1 i value is 154
method1 i value is 155
method1 i value is 156
method1 i value is 157
method1 i value is 158
method1 i value is 159
method1 i value is 160
method1 i value is 161
method1 i value is 162
method1 i value is 163
method1 i value is 164
method1 i value is 165
method1 i value is 166
method1 i value is 167
method1 i value is 168
method1 i value is 169
method1 i value is 170
method1 i value is 171
method1 i value is 172
method1 i value is 173
method1 i value is 174
method1 i value is 175
method1 i value is 176
method1 i value is 177
method1 i value is 178
method1 i value is 179
method1 i value is 180
method1 i value is 181
method1 i value is 182
method1 i value is 183
method1 i value is 184
method1 i value is 185
method1 i value is 186
method1 i value is 187
method1 i value is 188
method1 i value is 189
method1 i value is 190
method1 i value is 191
method1 i value is 192
method1 i value is 193
method1 i value is 194
method1 i value is 195
method1 i value is 196
method1 i value is 197
method1 i value is 198
method1 i value is 199
method1 i value is 200
method1 i value is 201
method1 i value is 202
Entered into method1 >>>>>>>>>
method1 i value is 0
method1 i value is 1
method1 i value is 2
method1 i value is 3
method1 i value is 4
method1 i value is 5
method1 i value is 6
method1 i value is 7
method1 i value is 8
method1 i value is 9
method1 i value is 10
method1 i value is 11
method1 i value is 12
method1 i value is 13
method1 i value is 14
method1 i value is 15
method1 i value is 16
method1 i value is 17
method1 i value is 18
method1 i value is 19
method1 i value is 20
method1 i value is 21
method1 i value is 22
method1 i value is 23
method1 i value is 24
method1 i value is 25
method1 i value is 26
method1 i value is 27
method1 i value is 28
method1 i value is 29
method1 i value is 30
method1 i value is 31
method1 i value is 32 .....
My question is as i delcared the method " method1()" as synchronized, after completion of printing the first 1000 only second thread has to enter in to this method.
Am I wrong any where ?
Thanks,
Sudhakar

1) When you post code, please use[code] and
[/code] tags as described in
[url=http://forum.java.sun.com/help.jspa?sec=formattin
g]Formatting tips on the message entrypage. It makes it much easier to read.
Sure. I will do it from next time.
2) Was it really necessary to post 200 lines or so of
output? Couldn't you have posted just a few to give
us the general idea?I think it will give better understanding. So ...
3) It's not clear to me what your question is. Are
you saying you expected something like
T1
T2
T1
T2
etc.
If so, then you're mistaken. The whole point of
multithreading is that you don't know or care which
thread executes which instructions when. There's no
"execute a statement then switch threads" rule. That
would occur ridiculous amounts of overhead.As per my understanding, If one thread enters into synchronized method, the other threads needs to wait until the completion of first one.
So, first it needs to print
method1 i value is 1
method1 i value is 2
method1 i value is 1000
then second thread should start printing.
Is my understanding wrong or ... ?

Problem with multirecord block

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for