Problem with Per diem calculation in Travel Management module

Dear ALL,
We have configured Travel Management module in SAP and we have an issue with per diem calculation, viz., whenever we add an additional destination in the trip (T.code TRIP).
Ex: Employee's travel plan from 10/8/2011 (06.00 hrs) to 13/8/2011 (06:00 hrs)... in 24 hrs format. When the employee goes directly to one destination and coming back, the per diem calc is coming right. i.e., per diem amount for 3 days.
But when we add additional destination between the trip period- viz., either 10th eve (18.00 hrs) or on 11th Aug- the per diem calc is being done by system for 4 days instead of 3 days only.
In otherwords, for every additional destination in the itinerary, one extra per diem is being calculated (when we simulate in T.Code: PR05)
Would appreciate guidance ASAP.
Regards,
Santosh

hello,
I am having similar kind of problem can you please share your solution
Regards
Sarthak Arora

Similar Messages

Import US Per Diems from Internet Travel Management

Dear all!
I hope someone can help me.
I have problems with the IMG Activity "Import US Per Diems/Flat Rates from Internet" (Transaction PREP)
Path is: Financial Accounting > Travel Management > Travel Expenses > Trip Reimbursement Amounts > Automatic Import of Travel Expense Per Diems
Does someone use this step and can give me a short flow how I can use it?
I guess that the help of this transaction is not actual. If I follow the description, i'm not able to upload the per diem rates.
Thanks!
Stefan

Hi,
Thank you for giving the quick reply.
1. I created the Create Assignement from menu file option at that time it was asked the path to save the text file.I stored that in desktop with "oconus.txt" and displayed the message 13 Bytes transferd.
2. I clciked the Import Assignment and it was asked the Trip Prov.Varint gave 81(US Accounting (M&IE))
asked the file to open i opened the last save the text file "oconus.txt" file .
3. Then i clicked the Create Entries 706O. it was displayed Test Run: No changes in database.
4. I clicked the Import Diems and chosed the "oconus.txt" file which was stored in desktop.
5. Then i clicked Create Entries Accom / Meals in that pop up i choosed the method Meals and IncidentExpences(M&IE) and Reimbursment amunt as Transfer tax free account.and clicked the enter it was displayed the Test Run: No changes in database
6. I checked in the table V_T706U table and gave the Trip Prov.Varint gave 81(US Accounting (M&IE))
and executed and no single values were displaying.
Can you please tell me how to solve this.It's imp for me.
Thank you in advacne.
Thanks.

Data Integrator Problem with the profiles of the "Security Manager" module.

Hi!!!,
I wanted to be able to obtain a profile that do not eliminate anything in the “Topology Manager” module. I duplicated de original “TOPOLOGY ADMIN” profile and for each object I removed the “delete” method.
That with the purpose of the user that has to asigned this profile can not delete anything of this module. The option delete is disabled, but when the user made clic in the trash can icon or he types ENTER, he can delete only the master repository.
I do not if this is because some update, I´m use 10.1.3.5 ODI version.
Can somebody helpme please???.
Thanks.
Edited by: 807694 on 5/01/2011 11:07 AM

Hi,
For BI 7 data source, you need transport active version from BW development to quality. So the procss is
1. Transport data source in source system
2. Replicate data source in BI system.
3. Transport active version of data source from BI system.
4. Transport other objects.
5. Load data till PSA.
6. Load DTP from PSA to data target.
Regards,
Pravin

Per Diem Calculations for Single Day and Multiple Days

Hi Gurus
I have just now confronted a weird calculation of Per Diems.
I have configured Per Diems for 1 Day say $50 per Day, irrespective of the no.of hours.
When I create a trip for a single day, the system is calculating $50 Per DIem for one day.
Whereas, when I create a trip for 3 days, the system is calculating only for Two days i.e, $50x2=$100 and not $150 as expected, meaning the lfirst and seond day gets calculated and the last day is not getting calculated
Please let me know where I am missing the little configuration in order to let the system calculate for multiple days correctly ?
This is an urgent requirement please.....Need help.
Thank you
RRoy

Hi,
As I told you earlier that there could be serval options which needs to be checked again.
For example:
a) V_T702N_D
b) Your per diem table
I think if you have checked 24 hours in V_T702N_D , then please verify the trip duration on PR05
If it was working earlier then below might help you...
For Example:
Start date/time 23-July-2011 Time 00:00
End date/time 25-July-2011 Time 00:00
Here above number of days are three (23,24,25) but calculation for meals shall be done for two days, because for three days per diem calculation it shall be 48:01 Hours above is 48 Hours..
Please try in PR05 and check the results.
Start date/time 23-July-2011 Time 00:00
End date/time 25-July-2011 Time 00:01
So please check again and let know in case of problem..
Regards,
Muhammad Umer

Hi Folks, I have a problem with OBIEE EM, There in Enterprise Manager i am unable to navigate into the options like when i clik on any Tab it is not working and even i am unable to create a report using analysis.

Hi Folks,
I have a problem with OBIEE EM, There in Enterprise Manager i am unable to navigate into the options like when i clik on any Tab it is not working and even i am unable to create a report using analysis.
Thanks in advance

i have also tried that but no use can u give me any other way.......

Im having a problem with my ps elements 8,download manager active x has encountered a problem

im having a problem with my ps elements 8,download manager active x has encountered a problem
adobe reader and acro manager has encountered a problem and needs to closed
-+++reg.exe has encounter a problem
-invidia graphics driver has stopped working properly.

Check out this link if any of the information in there can help you move forward:
http://kb2.adobe.com/cps/400/kb400530.html
Regards,
Ankush

Problem with config sync between two CSM-S modules

Hi everybody,
I have a problem with config sync between two CSM-S modules.
I am using CSM-S software version 2.1(8).
The acitve module is used in a 6509 with WS-SUP720-BASE supervisor running software version 12.2(18)SXF12a.
The standby module is used in a 6509-V with VS-S720-10G supervisor (no VSS setup) running software version 12.2(33)SXI3.
Failover seems to work fine:
switch-active#sh modu csm 2 ft
FT group 1, vlan 398
This box is active
Configuration is out-of-sync
priority 150, heartbeat 3, failover 40, preemption is on
switch-standby# sh modu csm 2 ft
FT group 1, vlan 398
This box is in standby state
Configuration is out-of-sync
priority 80, heartbeat 3, failover 40, preemption is on
The command (on active side) "hw-module contentSwitchingModule 2 standby config-sync" leads to following result:
switch-active:
2010-04-14T16:21:45+02:00 srz16-1b.net.dsh.at/srz16-1b.net.dsh.at 56042: Apr 14 16:21:44.223: %CSM_SLB-6-REDUNDANCY_INFO: Module 2 FT info: Active: Bulk sync started
2010-04-14T16:21:45+02:00 srz16-1b.net.dsh.at/srz16-1b.net.dsh.at 56043: Apr 14 16:21:44.251: %CSM_SLB-6-REDUNDANCY_INFO: Module 2 FT info: Active: Sending configurations to Standby CSM, this may take several minutes!
2010-04-14T16:21:46+02:00 srz16-1b.net.dsh.at/srz16-1b.net.dsh.at 56044: Apr 14 16:21:45.995: %CSM_SLB-6-REDUNDANCY_INFO: Module 2 FT info: Active: Sending configuration to Standby CSM
2010-04-14T16:21:51+02:00 srz16-1b.net.dsh.at/srz16-1b.net.dsh.at 56045: Apr 14 16:21:50.831: %CSM_SLB-6-REDUNDANCY_INFO: Module 2 FT info: Active: Sending configuration to Standby CSM
2010-04-14T16:21:57+02:00 srz16-1b.net.dsh.at/srz16-1b.net.dsh.at 56046: Apr 14 16:21:56.151: %CSM_SLB-6-REDUNDANCY_INFO: Module 2 FT info: Active: Sending configuration to Standby CSM
2010-04-14T16:22:59+02:00 srz16-1b.net.dsh.at/srz16-1b.net.dsh.at 56047: Apr 14 16:22:58.791: %CSM_SLB-3-REDUNDANCY: Module 2 FT error: Active: Manual bulk sync timed out
2010-04-14T16:22:59+02:00 srz16-1b.net.dsh.at/srz16-1b.net.dsh.at 56048: Apr 14 16:22:58.803: %CSM_SLB-3-REDUNDANCY: Module 2 FT error:
2010-04-14T16:22:59+02:00 srz16-1b.net.dsh.at/srz16-1b.net.dsh.at 56049: FT CONFIG SYNC: Failed config sync entity send
switch-standby:
2010-04-14T16:21:45+02:00 srz31-5a.net.dsh.at/srz31-5a.net.dsh.at 2475: Apr 14 16:21:44.232: %CSM_SLB-6-REDUNDANCY_INFO: Module 2 FT info: Standby: Bulk sync started
2010-04-14T16:21:45+02:00 srz31-5a.net.dsh.at/srz31-5a.net.dsh.at 2476:
2010-04-14T16:21:45+02:00 srz31-5a.net.dsh.at/srz31-5a.net.dsh.at 2477: Apr 14 16:21:44.240: %CSM_SLB-6-REDUNDANCY_INFO: Module 2 FT info: STANDBY:Configuration is being received, This may take several minutes!
2010-04-14T16:21:49+02:00 srz31-5a.net.dsh.at/srz31-5a.net.dsh.at 2478: Apr 14 16:21:48.824: %CSM_SLB-6-REDUNDANCY_INFO: Module 2 FT info: Standby: Receiving configuration from Active CSM
2010-04-14T16:21:54+02:00 srz31-5a.net.dsh.at/srz31-5a.net.dsh.at 2479: Apr 14 16:21:53.964: %CSM_SLB-6-REDUNDANCY_INFO: Module 2 FT info: Standby: Receiving configuration from Active CSM
2010-04-14T16:21:59+02:00 srz31-5a.net.dsh.at/srz31-5a.net.dsh.at 2480: Apr 14 16:21:58.852: %CSM_SLB-6-REDUNDANCY_INFO: Module 2 FT info: Standby: Started clearing configuration
2010-04-14T16:21:59+02:00 srz31-5a.net.dsh.at/srz31-5a.net.dsh.at 2481: Apr 14 16:21:59.400: %CSM_SLB-4-REDUNDANCY_WARN: Module 2 FT warning: Standby: Config Sync does not save running-config to startup-config
2010-04-14T16:22:00+02:00 srz31-5a.net.dsh.at/srz31-5a.net.dsh.at 2482: Apr 14 16:21:59.400: %CSM_SLB-6-REDUNDANCY_INFO: Module 2 FT info: Standby: Previous configuration are being deleted from supervisor
The last log message on standby device seems to be correct - there is no CSM configuration after the attempted config sync.
Our configuration includes about 3500 lines and it is really uncomfortable to keep in sync manually.
Maybe someone has the same problem?
kind regards,
Christoph

Hi Christoph,
I am running into the exact same issue. Upon further investigation I've discovered that this is a known bug, CSCtd09117. You can read more about it here: http://tools.cisco.com/Support/BugToolKit/search/getBugDetails.do?method=fetchBugDetails&bugId=CSCtd09117 . Apparently this is fixed in ver 12.2(32.8.11)SX323 .
I haven't had a chance to upgrade yet, so I can't verify the fix, but if it works for you please let me know.
Regards,
Brandon

Meals per diem calculations

hi friends,
We have a requirement in our project where in travel management we have to do calculations for the meals per diem .
For example in our case if an employee applies for travel from 01.07.2011 time 09:00:00 and end date is 02.07/2011 time is
09:30:00. According to standard it isconsidering 2 days but in our case it should be only 1 day because here we have a cushion period of 30 minutes after 24 hours. So if the time is 09:31:00 for the end date only then it should be considered as second day else should be considered as only 1 day. Can anyone help me with the solution. Is there any user exit ?
Thanks in advance
raju
Moderator message : Spec dumping / Outsourcing not allowed. Thread locked.
Edited by: Vinod Kumar on Jul 12, 2011 12:11 PM

Hi Experts !
I resolved the issue of Complex Per Diels (Meals & Accommodations) myself.
All the calculations for both the Per Diems are calculating very accurate.
This thread is being closed.
Regards
Samantha

HCM - PER DIEM CONFIG IN EXPENSE MANAGEMENT

Hiii
I have configured Expense Type as " Acco PEr Diem and Meals Per Diem and have updated the tables V_T706V and V_T706B2 with a limit of CAD 500 but when I am creating an Expense Entry for CAD 2000 or any other amount it is not showing me any Error that it is beyond the permissible limit. I have assigned this error message in the config. Please let me know I I have missed out on something. I have only done things from SPRO / config.

For Mileage you have to do the following configuration....
Travel Management -> Travel Expenses -> Trip Reimbursement amounts -> reimbursement Amounts travel costs -> Miles/KM cumulation
Define Miles/Km cumulation
Assign cumulation procedure for Vehicle types/classes
Define period parameters
Define periods
Define Flate rates for travel costs (table V_T706F)
Apart from that you have to maintain table V_T702N_A ....travel cost settlement with miles cumulation or without miles cumulation based on your requirement.
Mohan

Meals per diem error in Travel Expense Report

Hi All,
I am getting the below error while creating the Travel Expense report. Meals per diem is not getting calculated. Let me know if i missed any configuration here. Appreciate your help.

Hi,
As said by the error message you are missing entries in table T706V : Per diem for meals scaled by hours.
And here you are missing the entry for trop provision variant "ID" for the country "IN"
Please start SM30 on view V_T706V to enter meal allowance amounts per countries and per hours.
Regards,
Christophe

Problem with Math In Calculated Fields

I am calculating a group incident rate for data returned from
a query. The formula is Number of cases multiplied by 200000
divided by number of hours worked. Cases in my report is the
calculated field: calc.CaseSum (the sum of cases for the group)
Hours is calc.SumHours (the sum of hours for the group). The actual
values for these variables (for the first group are 48 and 29427171
respectively. When I create the following calculated field called
rate using the formula: (calc.CaseSum * 200000) / calc.SumHours,
Cold Fusion Generates a Runtime Error:
Invalid ColdFusion expression in report. If the expression is
a string, ensure that it is within quotes. Error: (calc.CaseSum *
200000) / calc.SumHours is not a valid ColdFusion expression.
If I use the constant value "29427171" as the divisor, the
report works albeit only for the first group. Any ideas; is this a
bug, or am I misusing the product?
Addition: I forgot to mention I am using CF8. Also this
formula worked fine as a Report Total before I introduced grouping
and modified the calculated fields to reset on the change of a
group.

Sorry, I've been on another project for awhile. This problem
will certainly be a "show stopper" for me if I cannot resolve it.
As I mentioned in my original post, I used a constant in the
formula in lieu of the variable and the calculation worked. This
would suggest that CF does not have a problem with a large number.
In spite of that reasoning, I tried Tony's suggested (thanks
by the way!) with the identical outcome, only difference is the new
formula is displayed in the error message.
Tony, you also suggested that I set the variables using
CFSET... How would I do this within the report writer environment.
I had tried a similar approach: to perform half the calculation
i.e. that within the parenthesis, and assign that value to a
separate "calculated field: and then perform the rest of the
calculation on that variable with the same outcome.
I think that I may be dealing with a CF bug here, I'd like to
find a workaround... I've noticed that CF8 has a new patch, perhaps
after I apply it, I may be able to get this thing to work. I'm on
another project right now so it will be a few days before I can
test this theory, I report the result.
Should this fail, and no one can come up with a workaround, I
will report this to Adobe.

Problems with the installation of Oracle Role Manager

Hello everyone;
I have a problem with the deployment of Jboss 4.05GA; just can not load the Role Manager Administrative Console (http://localhost:8080/ormconsole)
Probe load the Jboss and that if I load the console this APPSERVER (http://localhost:8080)
Also probe load the Role Manager Web UI and I had no problems (http://localhost:8080/webui)
Use the method of installation Install Software Only then can make the integration with the IOM.
Any suggestions for solving this problem.
Part of the Log:
14:17:02,953 ERROR [URLDeploymentScanner] Incomplete Deployment listing:
--- Incompletely deployed packages ---
org.jboss.deployment.DeploymentInfo@40e1e159 { url=file:/C:/jboss-4.0.5.GA/serve
r/default/deploy/server.ear }
deployer: org.jboss.deployment.EARDeployer@873723
status: Deployment FAILED reason: URL file:/C:/jboss-4.0.5.GA/server/default/t
mp/deploy/tmp18940server.ear-contents/ormconsole-exp.war/ deployment failed
state: FAILED
watch: file:/C:/jboss-4.0.5.GA/server/default/deploy/server.ear
altDD: null
lastDeployed: 1228418189671
lastModified: 1228418186515
mbeans:
--- MBeans waiting for other MBeans ---
ObjectName: jboss.web.deployment:war=ormconsole.war,id=-1206236729
State: FAILED
Reason: org.jboss.deployment.DeploymentException: URL file:/C:/jboss-4.0.5.GA/
server/default/tmp/deploy/tmp18940server.ear-contents/ormconsole-exp.war/ deploy
ment failed
--- MBEANS THAT ARE THE ROOT CAUSE OF THE PROBLEM ---
ObjectName: jboss.web.deployment:war=ormconsole.war,id=-1206236729
State: FAILED
Reason: org.jboss.deployment.DeploymentException: URL file:/C:/jboss-4.0.5.GA/
server/default/tmp/deploy/tmp18940server.ear-contents/ormconsole-exp.war/ deploy
ment failed
14:17:03,281 INFO [Http11BaseProtocol] Starting Coyote HTTP/1.1 on http-0.0.0.0
-8080
14:17:03,718 INFO [ChannelSocket] JK: ajp13 listening on /0.0.0.0:8009
14:17:03,781 INFO [JkMain] Jk running ID=0 time=0/94 config=null
14:17:04,015 INFO [Server] JBoss (MX MicroKernel) [4.0.5.GA (build: CVSTag=Bran
ch_4_0 date=200610162339)] Started in 1m:35s:859ms
Thank you

HI JLK,
i think i have solved the problem. Try to install the Oracle Role Manager with the installer and select the "Install Software and Configure" and install the "Standard Model" to the Database. Don't deploy the standard.car file.
I hope i could help you.
Thomas

Germany config: Trips with per diems created in express expense sheet

Hi
Im about to config Germany and we have alot of sales guys who creates many small trips so naturally they need to use the express expense sheet.
But is it possible to configure the schema so each line covers serveral days so it will calculate the correct per diem depending on the travel times?
Edited by: morten kristensen on Dec 5, 2011 10:34 AM

Hi,
Once the advance is approved by the approver, in table ptrv_perio, field antrg is becoming 4. Once the status becomes 4, by standard you will not be in a position to edit the trips further.
Now test the following, before approving the advance, try creating expense claim. The system will allow you to create.
If this is successful, you have to restrict the field antrg in ptrv_perio to still be @ 2 instead of changing it two 4.
Let me know, if you have any further issues.
Best Regards,
Raj

Hour rounding for the per diem calculation in Germany

Dear Experts,
In Germany the Law for the calculation of the per diem is as below:-
   00 Euros = less than 8 hours
   06 Euros = greater than or equal to 8 hours and < 14 hours
   12 Euros = greater than or equal to 14 hours and < 24 hours
   24 Euros = 24 hours
I have set up the hour scales in V_T706V as below:-
Hour              Amount
7     = 00.00 EUR
13     = 06.00 EUR
23     = 12.00 EUR
24     = 24.00 EUR
Now system is rounding the partial hour to the next hour, i.e. for 7.50 hours, it is calculating 8 hours and thus per diem as 6 Eur.
Howeverwe want that for less then 8 hour it should be 0 Eur.
Please let me know if I am missing any setting, or any other workaround. As this is a legal requirement, we must have to implement it.
Many thanks,
Gaurav
Edited by: gka2707 on Jun 10, 2010 2:28 PM
Edited by: gka2707 on Jun 10, 2010 2:29 PM
Edited by: gka2707 on Jun 10, 2010 2:31 PM

Hi Gaurav,
It depends upon how you write the coding for the calculation.
If you want 0 - 7 hrs 59 min = 0 Euros and if it is 8 hrs - 6 Euros.
Then, you need to say if it is less 7hrs 59 min. or equal to = 0 and if it is 8 or greater than = 6 euros.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
S.Srikanth.

Problem with Digital Signature strategy in Document Managment System

Hello ALL,
I am facing problem with Digital Signature strategy in DMS. If any help its greatly appreciated.
I have senario where Approvers in DMS will review the document and approve the document and put on their digitial signature. if i have multiple approvers maintained in the characterstics it has to check weather it has been approved by all approvers otherwise it has to reset the status to for approval.
My problem is i am able to reset the status back from approved to for approval using the badi document_status01 but when the next approver logs in to the document and change the status to approved he is not able to get the digital signature pop up which it comes only first user approves it.
can any one help me out on whats going wrong in it.
Thanks
Srikanth Aduri.

Hi,
maybe the reason for this is that the status of the digital signature is not changed. Then the system thinks that the digital signature is still completed and therefore the user is not getting the pop-up again. The database table for the digital signature for documents is TC77. I hope this information is usefull for you.
Best regards,
Christoph

Problem with Per diem calculation in Travel Management module

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for