Problem with Rebate agreement

We have a problem with Rebate agreement settlement.
Generally when the finall settlement of Rebate is completed ( with status D - D means final settlement ), the liability should be zero. However, after we made final settlement, still some amount is showing as liability when we looked at the sales volume of the rebate agreement.
Please help us to fix the issue.
Thanks in advance for the help.

Hello,
Please review the Note 392683.
Regards,
Raghavendra YN

Similar Messages

Problem with Rebate Agreement Sales Volume

Hi,
I executed the rebate recalculation via SDBONT06 for a total of 93 agreements on 04.08.2014 and therefore the sales volume was updated and there was no message in VBO3 as well.
But today when i am checking the agreements all of them are showing message "Sales Volume is not Current"
I have gone through all the threads on SCN for this.
there have not been any changes in payer, sales org, agreement or agreement conditions.
I dont see any customizing also changed.
Please help asap as to what can be the reason for this message all of a sudden.
Regards,
Aayush Jain
SAP SD Consultant

Hi Aayush
When you rebuild the rebate index table VBOX all agreement conditions will be set to retroactive again. I guess someone has run RV15B001 on your system in the meantime ?
The "Sales Volume is not current" message is issued when the rebate condition is flagged as retroactive (KONP-KSPAE) SDBONT06 resets that when it has completed a successful update
So just run SDBONT06 again, all of you 93 agreements are updated so the report will only reset the KONP-KSPAE field on the conditions in that case.
Hope it helps you further
Kind regards
Brian

Problem in rebate agreement type 0005

Hi
I created a rebate agreement of type 0005 and maintained amount Rs 5000 for a customer
while creating billing document the condition type BO06 was determined in the billing doc but without anu value
the analysis shows that condition record has been found
I have checked the pricing date and all other parameters but still not able to figure out the mistake
Kindly help me in this regard
Thanks and Regards
SunilIyer

Hi SunilIyer
If you are working with the standard rebate agreement 0005 and condition type BO06
You will be working with a sales independant agreement and a fixed amount condition.
For a fixed amount there is no posting of accruals because it is already known what the
liability is in the agreement.
If accruals are required most customer's would post a manual accrual from the agreement
for the fixed amount of the agreement condition.
In your billing document you will see the Bo06 condition is determined and the agreement is
known but the condition value will always be 0.00 for a fixed amount.
This is correct and expected
Hope this helps explain the system behaviour
Kind regards
Brian

Problems in Rebate agreement

The problem is that After final rebate settlement there is still open accrual.
And in another agreement the p&l effect in SAP is much more higher than the difference of accrued and paid amounts.
I revised already the agreement conditions and I didn't find out anything....
Where can be the Problem?
Thanks in advance and regards
William

Dear Tirumalasetti,
This may be due to there is holiday in that calendar on the date of the Rebate agreement period end date.
So please change the Rebate agreement period end date or change holiday to working day in that calendar on that date.
I this will help you,
Regards,
Murali.

Problem with rebates

Hi thr,
I have a requirement in rebates or rather just want to know if this functionality is supported by SAP.
We have created a rebate for a customer who has several ship-to parties. Also, the rebate condition are created seperatly for different ship-to-praties with a combination of sold-to/ship-to/product hierarchy. We want to do manual accruals and we put 10$ on each customer for four different ship-to (same customer but different ship-to). However, when we checked in BI report it is showing the entered amount 40 $ only under one ship-to.
Could someone please let me know if we can have the functionality where in the accrued amount hits ship-to in case there are more than one.
Please clarify.

Hi,
     What I understand from the requirement is that, one Sold-to party has many ship to party and you want to accrue the amount for each ship- to party. But it is not showing the accrual for each ship to party separately and it is showing for only the sold-to party which is also a ship-to party.
   Actually, the rebate is accrued for the payer only and not for ship-to parties. As far as I understand, in your case, all the ship-to parties are associated with one payer ( which is Sold-to party), so you are getting a accrual for single payer ( not for the ship to party).
   So, if you have single payer and rebate agreement for him, then you cannot accrue the amount for each ship-to parties.
   If each ship-to parties are also the payer, then you can create a rebate agreement for each one and in the sales order, in the line items, if you assign the ship-to party and payer and process it and it will be accrued for each payer ( which is also the ship to party).

Problem with sender agreement in rfc

My scenary is RFC -> XI -> FILE.
I created one message interface with atribute asyncronous and output message the rfc.
I created one interface mapping and message mapping
In integration directory I created one chanel of comunication,the receiver determination, the interface determination, the receiver agreement and the sender agreement. In the sender agreement in interface I put the same name of message interface and then I activated all.
When i execute the rfc i have one dump. This dump is "senderAgreement not found: lookup of binding via CPA-cache". But i declarated and activated the sender agreement.
Somebody knows the problem.
Thank's for all.

Hi Antonio,
A few things that you should know:
1) You need not create a message interface for RFC, as RFC iself is an interface.
2) You need to create one inbound message interface for file message.
3) You will need two message mapping, one for request message and one for response message in case yours is a synchronous scenario. But only one message mapping (request) in case of asynchronous scenario.
4)One interface mapping both for sync and async scenario.
In Integration Directory:
1) 2 communication channels: sender RFC and receiver File.
2) 1 Receiver determination, interface determination and sender aggrement.
Regards,
Ashish

Problem with Sender Agreement for EDI File to Idoc scenario

I'm configuring PI for EDI with Seeburger Adapter (Calling as a Module) and I'm having an issue with the Sender Agreement using File Adapter.
Process used is File to IDOC. EDI data will be picked up from VAN (Using existing FTP process rather than using Seeburger FTP) and stored in a folder which is being accessed by PI to send to R/3 to create orders.
All my inbound EDI will be stored in same folder which should be picked up by XI and distribute the same depending upon the respective scenario's in ID and respective mapping/config in IR.
The whole process IR & ID works fine and also creates Idoc in R/3, if I configure for one customer for EDI 850, but when I try to configure for second customer for same EDI 850 having same ANSIX12 version (V4010) as previous customer, I get stuck at the Sender Agreement part for this second customer because I use the same CC for File read for both the customers (Scenarios) and since there is a limitation with File Adapter "sender channel must not be assigned to more than one sender agreement ".
How can I create the Sender Agreement using the same CC for my other scenario?
I tried creating multiple CC for different scenario but when I place a test file for customer A, I see that its being picked up by both CC's.
Pl Advise.
Thanks!
PSR

You need to configure splitter as module in sender file adapter (classifier->bic->splitter) as well as define a message splitter(with partner number and Seeburger mapping) in Seeburger workbench.
Thank you for the reply Aamir,
Do you have any document which can guide me through the process?
Does Seeburger Workbench play any role here? because I'm not using See FTP adapter to connect to my VAN. We get the data from the VAN using FTP process but not using See FTP. I'm using BIC to generate an XSD and SDA file, rest everything is in XI using File to idoc and IDOC to file process.
Thx
PSR

Problem with sender agreement

Hi,
We are trying to send a file from the file system (using file channel) to XI. However we are getting the error as " No suitable sender agreement" found error in the communication channel monitoring in RWB. However the sender agreement is very much there and is activated also.
Any idea on this ?
Regards
Ganesh

Hi,
try creating your scenario with a integration directory wizard
it will make sure that everything is correct
Regards,
michal
<a href="/people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2005/06/28/xipi-faq-frequently-asked-questions"><b>XI / PI FAQ - Frequently Asked Questions</b></a>

Problem with replication agreement

Hi All,
I am trying to setup a replication agreement within the version 5.1 console. I am using a multi-master model. I have run into a snag in that section where I need to enter the Consumer and the Connection->Simple Authentication. For some reason after I enter in the proper information the next button is still 'greyed' out.
Is this an indication that something is not right?
Thank you for any help/information.

Please ignore this post. I was able to sort my way through this porblem only to find another involving permissions.

Problems with license agreement

I've download a trial version for adobe acrotal 9 pro extended. I've installed in my computer and when I try to run this program, the license agreement appears, I accept and the program shutdown

Thanks.
Finally, my Acrobat 9 pro works. I changed read/write permissions on "C:\Program Files\Common Files\Adobe\Adobe PCD".

Settling Rebate Agreements with Validity Start Date not Start of the Month

Hello Experts,
I am currently trying to settle a rebate agreement with validity dates November 20, 2011 to December 31, 2011. However, after the credit memo is created, I noticed that the Service rendered date is today's date, but I expected it to be the same as my Settlement Date = November 30, 2011 (a month-end). Please advise if this is normal. If not, please advise how to correct the automatic entry of dates.
Thanks,
M

Hi
Kindly let us know what is the rebate agreement type that has been used for which you are facing problem and for which rebate agreement type you are getting the month end date.Check wheather scale basis is B(Value scale) has been maintained or not for the rebate agreement for which you are getting problem.So check the differences between the two rebate agreement types.As The service rendered date of the invoice line item is used to determine the validity of a rebate condition record
Regards
Srinath

Rebate agreement problem

HI,
I have created rebate agreement for my own by coping the standard one 0003 customer rebate .and created my own condition type and assign it to pricing procedure .Now the problem is when i created billing document it shows the rebate condition type with proper value .But when i release the billing document to accounting then the condition type releavent for rebate vanish. But when i use the standard one it shows also after releasing it to accounting .Can you please tell what could be the problem .I have checked there is no diffrence with the standard but only Access Sequence . I also created accesss sequence with the acess category 1. Thanks in advance .
Regards,
Abhijit ...

Hi ,
I have checked the Accky "ERU" and Accr "ERB"...there is no problem regarding that ....
Thanks .
Abhijit

Problem during settlement of an enhanced rebate agreement

Hi,
I am trying to configure enhanced rebate agreement in my company. I think I've completed all prerequisites to start using this functionality: the enterprise extension EA-ISE is active, the info structure S136 and S469 were configured by using transaction OMO1, a VARKEY was assigned to an agreement type, table TMC2F has the required entries, etc.
As a matter of fact, when I create a billing the corresponding records in table S469 are inserted with the corresponding VARKEY (which only include de material number). However when I run the transaction RBT_ENH_VB7 to execute a final settlement of the agreement the material registered in VARKEY field of table S469 are not being transfered to the memo credit. Instead of these, the memo credit is created with the material of settlement.
¿What part of the configuration is missing? I have execute several times the transaction RBT_ENH_REBUILD but the result is the same.
Thanks in advance for any help you could provide me
Best regards
Andres

Hi,
I found the cause of my problem. The standard functionallity of extended rebate agreement was ignoring the record of table S469 because in transaction OMO1 the period split was defined as Day. The standard functionallity only consider "Month" as a period.
After modify this setting the memo credit created in a final settlement contain several lines associated to the records of table S469
Problem solved

Problems with Target service agreement

Problems with Target service agreement to repair my ipod nano. I have gone to the BBB. Who can I contact at Apple to let them know the poor service that Target gave with a Apple product?

Apple Customer Relations (800) 767-2775

Problem with MM Scheduling Agreement Inbound Delivery

Hello all Gurus,
I have a problem with inbound delivery. Whenever I am trying to create inbound delivery in VL31N with the total open quantity of MM scheduling agreement, I am getting a warning message as below
"Notified quantity less than goods receipt quantity".
If the quantity was less then 80, then I should get this message.
But the total open quantity in MM Scheduling agreement in ME38 is 80. So when I am creating the inbound delivery for 80, why system is giving me this warning message????
Kindly advise whether we have to maintain any settings anywhere or am I missing something here.
Thanks and Regards,
Umakanth.

Got the result.

Problem with Rebate agreement

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for