Problem with removing Search and Advanced Search functionalities in Portal

Hi,
      As per our client requirement, we have removed search and advanced search functionalities in Masthead and those are working fine. But when ever we restarted the portal server, these search options are reappearing in portal.
          I am not getting why it is happening and every time we restarted the server, we are removing these search functionalities from masthead.
          If anyone knows why it is happening, kindly share with us
Thanks & Regards
Pavan

Hi Santosh,
Problem is not solved. Where can i find the Standard tool area iview used in Default frame work page ?
At present, we disabeled the search and it's working fine. But when we restart the portal, search is again reappearing and we need to disable that once again.
Is there any sollution for this problem?? Kindly let me know..
Thanks & Regards
Pavan
Edited by: pavanakrishna reddy on Mar 24, 2010 9:44 AM

Similar Messages

Problem in using quick and advanced search based on transient items

Hi everybody
I want to have an unbound string item in my form and allow users to use advanced search and quick search on that item.
I read the following post About advanced search and added a transient
item on view object and overrode the advance search method in application module and realized that the value of that string was
added to arguments.
Then I decided to add this transient item on entity object instead of view object so that we were able to add the item in one place and
use it in several view objects. I added an item in the entity and unchecked the persistent flag but I can't set queryable flag since it was disable.
I added the item in the view object and by use of application definition I forced the item to be shown in the advance search.
I generate the application and the item was shown correctly in the advanced search but when I set the item in advanced search its value
was not sent to advance search method.
Is it a bug ? (value of the field in the advanced search section was not sent to advanced search method )
Is it a way to add a queryable transient item in the entity object and still benefit from overriding advanced search method ?
I am using Jdeveloper 10.1.3 and Jheadstart 10.1.3.
Any help would be appreciated.
Best Regards
Navid

Navid,
JHeadstart checks whether the attribute definition is queryable before adding it to the list of advanced search attributes. A transient VO attribute can still be set to queryable, for a transient EO attribute this is not possible. We will remove this check on queryability in the upcoming patch release, since you have a valid use case. For now, you can subclass JhsSearchBean and override method createArgumentListForAdvancedSearch and comment out the check for "def.isQueryable()".
Steven Davelaar,
JHeadstart Team.

Default Sort order for Search and Advanced Search

Does anybody know of any easy way to default search to show results by "last modified date" ?
Much thanks,
~Kevin.

You might try logging in as the guest user and editing the guest user preferences / search preferences as described by in the earlier posting. Also you can configure search by passing parameters in the URL - should be info about that in here somewhere...

Hide "search" in EP (the button and Advanced Search link)

Hi,
I need to hide field "search" (where button "Search" and "Advanced Search" link, after portal header).
How to do it or where can I manage this settings?
thanks.

Hi,
If you need to remove the search view from the Portal page then you can do the following.
Go to Content Administration -> Portal Content -> Content Provided by SAP -> End User Content -> Standard Portal Users
In this select the Default Framework page , open it.
Select the Tool Area and click on properties.
In the properties change the value to NO for Enable KM Search & Enable KM Search Advanced properties.
This is the simplest way you can remove the whole search area.
*There is one more way to remove the search *
If you want to remove the whole search, you can achieve this just by changing the com.sap.portal.toolAreaiView property "Enable KM Search". Just set the Property to NO.
If you want to remove only the search Button you have to edit the file "ToolAreaiView.jsp" from the PAR-File com.sap.portal.navigation.toolarea.par. Copy this file under your own namespace, unpack and remove the line:
<td nowrap> <%=searchButtonTextStr%> </td>
from the jsp-file. Redeploy this par file, create a new toolAreaiView based on the portal component in the PAR and integrate this iView in your frameworkpage.
Unfortunately, it's not possible to do this using the Theme Editor.
Regards,
Nikhil

I have a problem with my bluetooth and Wi-Fi, it seems not to connect and just keep searching

i have a problem with my bluetooth and Wi-Fi, it seems not to connect and just keep searching

Hello there, charles.
The following Knowledge Base article offers up some great information and links in regards to things that can interfere with both Bluetooth and Wi-Fi:
Wi-Fi and Bluetooth: Potential sources of wireless interference
http://support.apple.com/kb/ht1365
Additionally the following articles offer specific steps for each:
iOS: Troubleshooting Bluetooth connections
http://support.apple.com/kb/TS4562
and
iOS: Troubleshooting Wi-Fi networks and connections
http://support.apple.com/kb/ts1398
Thanks for reaching out to Apple Support Communities.
Cheers,
Pedro.

Problem with my iTunes store, cannot search, stays in one application that I already purchased. Please help!

Problem with my iTunes store, cannot search, stays in one application that I already purchased. Please help!

Go to Settings, Store, Apple ID, Sign out and then sign back in again and have another go.
Also, try a Reset [Hold the Home and Sleep/Wake buttons down together for 10 seconds or so (until the Apple logo appears) and then release. The screen will go blank and then power ON again in the normal way.] It is app and data safe!

I have upgraded Apple Aperture from version 2 to version 3 and I'm having a problem with the "Highlights and Shadows" adjustment. According to the user's manual, I should have access to an advanced disclosure triangle which would allow me to adjust mid co

I have upgraded Apple Aperture from version 2 to version 3 and I'm having a problem with the "Highlights and Shadows" adjustment. According to the user's manual, I should have access to an advanced disclosure triangle which would allow me to adjust mid contrast, colour, radius, high tonal width and low tonal width.
If anyone has any suggestions as to how to access this advanced section, I'd be most grateful.

Hi David-
The advanced adjustments in the Highlights & Shadows tool were combined into the "Mid Contrast" slider in Aperture 3.3 and later. If you have any images in your library that were processed in a version of Aperture before 3.3, there will be an Upgrade button in the Highlights & Shadows tool in the upper right, and the controls you asked about under the Advanced section. Clicking the Upgrade button will re-render the photo using the new version of Highlights & Shadows, and the Advanced section will be replaced with the new Mid Contrast slider. With the new version from 3.3 you probably don't need the Advanced slider, but if you want to use the older version you can download it from this page:
http://www.apertureexpert.com/tips/2012/6/12/reclaim-the-legacy-highlights-shado ws-adjustment-in-aperture.html

Complex request with range filter and boolean search

Hi
I need a build and maintain complex requests to Oracle Endeca Server. These requests could include different types of attributes: string, datetime, int.
For string attributes I have created a search interface and use boolean search. For datetime attributes I use a range filter. Separately it works as I expected, but it fails with combined search with range filter and boolean search in a single request. As I see from results range filter is completely ignored. What could be wrong with following request?
<?xml version="1.0" ?>
<S:Envelope xmlns:S="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/">
<S:Body>
<ns3:Request xmlns:ns2="http://www.endeca.com/MDEX/lql_parser/types" xmlns:ns3="http://www.endeca.com/MDEX/conversation/1/0">
<ns3:State/>
<ns3:Operator xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:type="ns3:RecordFilterOperator">
<ns3:RecordFilter Name="OnlyData">AND(NOT(mdex-property_Key),NOT(mdex-dimension_Key),NOT(mdex-config_Key),NOT(mdex-precedenceRule_Key),NOT(system-group_Key),NOT(system-group-membership_Key))</ns3:RecordFilter>
</ns3:Operator>
<ns3:Operator xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:type="ns3:SortOperator" Direction="Descending" Key="string_prop" OwnerId="Records"/>
<ns3:Operator xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:type="ns3:RangeFilterOperator">
<ns3:RangeFilter AttributeName="dateTime_prop">
<ns3:LowerBound Inclusive="true">2012-07-24T19:47:01Z</ns3:LowerBound>
</ns3:RangeFilter>
</ns3:Operator>
<ns3:Operator xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:type="ns3:SearchOperator">
<ns3:SearchFilter SnippetLength="20" EnableSnippeting="true" Mode="Boolean" Key="orderSearch">multiple_prop : one</ns3:SearchFilter>
</ns3:Operator>
<ns3:ContentElementConfig xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:type="ns3:RecordListConfig" HandlerFunction="RecordListHandler" HandlerNamespace="http://www.endeca.com/MDEX/conversation/1/0" Id="Records">
<ns3:RecordsPerPage>3</ns3:RecordsPerPage>
</ns3:ContentElementConfig>
</ns3:Request>
</S:Body>
</S:Envelope>
If my approach is incorrect could you provide me a a better way to handle such requests?
Regards,
Eugene.

Hi Eugene,
As you know, this issue has been discussed further, so I am posting here the summary of the findings, with the hope that this summary will benefit the Endeca Server user community at large.
* Boolean search only works with range filters for the AND operator. The documentation link above confirms this.
*Because of this restriction, you need to build another query that would achieve the same result. Both options are equally good and would achieve the results you need. Two suggestions that we've received were:
- Option 1. You could perform the key restriction of the search via a restrictive search interface rather than using the boolean match mode. This would involve creating a search interface for each field and then querying against the search interface for the field in question:
<Operator xmlns="http://www.endeca.com/MDEX/lql_parser/types" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:type="SearchOperator">
<SearchFilter SnippetLength="20" EnableSnippeting="true" Mode="All" Key="orderSearch_for_field_multiple_prop">one</SearchFilter>
</Operator>
For this option, you would have to create a search interface for each attribute, using the Config Web Service. Here is the topic about loading config documents into the Endeca Server:http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E29805_01/server.230/es_dev/toc.htm#Loading%20configuration%20documents
- Option 2
* You could implement the range filter through EQL row expression syntax instead and pass it in via the DataSourceFilterOperator, which acts as a prefilter on all other query logic, using the Conversation Web Service. Thus you might include:
<Operator xmlns="http://www.endeca.com/MDEX/lql_parser/types" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:type="DataSourceFilterOperator">
<DataSourceFilterString>dateTime_prop <= TO_DATETIME('2012-07-24T19:47:01Z')</DataSourceFilterString>
</Operator>
For this option, using the DataSourceFilter does not require you to model the rest of the query in EQL. It will perform slightly better than the filter in option 1 because of the order in which record set intersections are computed, but the difference is likely to be very small.
Finally, if this addresses your question, please mark this question as answered, so that others can benefit from it on the forum. Big thanks to Endeca Server development team (you know who you are!), for helping to find solutions for this request.
Julia
Edited by: JuliaM on Aug 30, 2012 2:05 PM
Edited by: JuliaM on Aug 30, 2012 2:06 PM

Problem with Group policies and Administrator count

I have one problem with Group policies and Admnistrator count.
Win XP, Client 4.91, Client Zen 4
I use DLU for users.
the Group policies are well applied and i keep them after logout for
security reasons.
But my problem is, after logout, the Administrator count becomes this
Group policies, and the only technique that I use, is to remove the
repertories c:\windows\system32\GroupPolicy*. Administrator must
loguing again for having good policies.
Can you help me?

Bill,
It appears that in the past few days you have not received a response to your
posting. That concerns us, and has triggered this automated reply.
Has your problem been resolved? If not, you might try one of the following options:
- Do a search of our knowledgebase at http://support.novell.com/search/kb_index.jsp
- Check all of the other support tools and options available at
http://support.novell.com.
- You could also try posting your message again. Make sure it is posted in the
correct newsgroup. (http://support.novell.com/forums)
Be sure to read the forum FAQ about what to expect in the way of responses:
http://support.novell.com/forums/faq_general.html
If this is a reply to a duplicate posting, please ignore and accept our apologies
and rest assured we will issue a stern reprimand to our posting bot.
Good luck!
Your Novell Product Support Forums Team
http://support.novell.com/forums/

Problems with captivate 8 and windows 8

I´m using captivate 8 and windows 8, and I am having problems with the visualization and publication of my projects. For visualization, there is a message of an error with syntax of the files ou directory, and nothing happens. For publication, I can´t see the project published in the browser. It opens only a text file, with the codes. Is there anyone thar can help me with that?

Acrobat 8 is not certified for Win7, particularly the x64 version. If you got the installation to go, the first step is to update AA8 to at least AA8.2. The x64 with XP required at least AA8.2 and I suspect that has not changed. I would suggest updating to the latest, either from the help menu (until no more updates are available) or by downloading the updates from the adobe.com>downloads page. For the latter, download ALL updates after your current version and install them in ORDER. They are not cummulative in most cases. You only need to reboot after the final update. The updates may get you going. If not, you may simply have to upgrade to AA9 or search for what others have been able to do in your situation.

Has anyone in Australia had problems with their appleTV and Virgin 4G wifi?

Has anyone in Australia had problems with their appleTV and Virgin 4G wifi?

Is there an actual technical support question there?
If curiousity was the only reason for posting, a simple search of the forums could have provided answers.

Problems with tethered capture and the 4.2 update

I'm having problems with tethered capture and my canon 1ds mark III since I updated to 4.2. Is anybody else having issues with tethered capture that was working fine before the update?

http://forums.adobe.com/community/search.jspa?peopleEnabled=true&userID=&spotlight=false&c ontainerType=14&container=3316&rankBy=date&q=4.2+tethering

Modifying Search and Quick Search

We will be having several departments getting in to our UCM. Right now it's been working well for one department but now other departments want to join UCM and need seperate accesses. Now I do understand there are several ways we can seperate departments such as security groups/profiles/rules... etc. But one thing I haven't been able to find anywhere is Modifying or Customizing Searches. Right now if a user from different department runs a "quick search" he/she is able to see documents from other departments but that's as far as it goes it won't let them check it out or check it in or do anything with the documents. Same thing happens when they use the Left Hand menu "SEARCH" menu.
I want to be able to limit users so when they hit "quick search" they only get search result that's ATLEAST pertaining to there own security group or their own department and same thing with when they run advance search. I want to limit them so they don't see any other documents in UCM acccept what they have "read or write" access to. Thanks in advance.

Hi you're right when you say "I do understand there are several ways we can seperate departments such as security groups/profiles/rules"
So this also apply for search, if your users can see other's people document it is because they have Read access to other people's accounts/sec groups, you have to make those departments totally disjoint.
You'll have to rethink your security model to separate the roles properly, if roles are not enough think about enabling accounts to give it more granularity.
My guess is that all your roles have access to Public security group and if people is checking content in Public then no matter which department you're from, you'll be able to read it, in any case some of your roles are accessing the same security group.

Toshiba sattelite pro ( SPM30 ) problem with black screen and white cursor

I have a toshiba SPM30 from a friend and I couldn't succed to resolve the problem with black screen and white cursor.I can enter in bios using F2 and I can use F12 but is not booting, I have some CD and DVD with Win Xp but it seeams that is not booting.I've traied to change the order in boot order: first CD/DVD and after HDD but still is not working...I saw that a HDD I can see details about it but at CD/DVD I can't see...I think that the CD/DVD is not working( but I can see the light and hear the sounds when I put a bootable CD or DVD)...Please, if someoane can help me......( byt the way I've traied to remove the bios battery and still is not working...)

Try f8 and try the repair your computer options
This explains advanced start up options:
http://windows.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/advanced-startup-options-including-safe-mode#1TC=windows-...
This explains start up repair:
http://windows.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/startup-repair-faq#1TC=windows-7
A system disc can be used for these repair options also, in your case if the DVD drive is not working you can use an external dvd drive if you have one.
S70-ABT2N22 Windows 7 Pro & 8.1Pro, C55-A5180 Windows 8.1****Click on White “Kudos” STAR to say thanks!****

I´ve a problem with Ancestry Toolbar and Firefox 4.0

I´ve a problem with Ancestry Toolbar and Firefox 4.0

Do a malware check with some malware scanning programs on the Windows computer.<br />
You need to scan with all programs because each program detects different malware.<br />
Make sure that you update each program to get the latest version of their databases before doing a scan.<br /><br />
*http://www.malwarebytes.org/mbam.php - Malwarebytes' Anti-Malware
*http://www.superantispyware.com/ - SuperAntispyware
*http://www.microsoft.com/windows/products/winfamily/defender/default.mspx - Windows Defender: Home Page
*http://www.safer-networking.org/en/index.html - Spybot Search & Destroy
*http://www.lavasoft.com/products/ad_aware_free.php - Ad-Aware Free
See also:
*"Spyware on Windows": http://kb.mozillazine.org/Popups_not_blocked

Problem with removing Search and Advanced Search functionalities in Portal

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for