Problem with segment segment E1EDK18

I have a problem in while processing inbound idoc.
I am able to post the idoc and create SO, I need to delete the segmentE1EDK18.If I dont delete, I am getting
below error
Terms of payment in IDoc E1EDK18 have been transferred: Check data
Please help me out in posting the idoc with out removeing the segment manually.

Cyril,
Thanks for responding, I wanted to do with out any ABAP,
and I have done the same.

Similar Messages

Problem with profitability segment derivation while posting sales order

Hello,
We have the issue of profitability segment being not derived when the sales order is changed using BAPI 'BAPI_SALESORDER_CHANGE'. Subsequent to calling this BAPI we execute a BDC - to derive the profitability segment - which runs well in the foreground but fails in the background. Immediate help in this regards would be of immense help.
I have searched the forum but could not locate anything useful. There is this thread (Re: BDC for profitability segment VA02 (sales order)) citing the same problem but without answers.
Kind Regards,
Indu Shekar

Probability Segment is maintained but Profitability Segment is still grayed out.
The only way i was able to move things to COPA was to do a project Settlement from
WBS element to Profitability Segment (PSA).
But does anyone know if we can move things to COPA during Sales Order (specifically for a project-based Sales Order)?
Thanks.

EDI file Mapping.. problem with UNT segment..!!

Hi all,
Anyone who worked on EDI files, pls help me..
Doing Idoc to EDI scenario..
I done for all the mapping for all the fields except for the UNT segment and field D_0074
Here i need to provide no of segments in the EDI file...
like
*UNBUNOA:393777:ZZ93139:ZZ080108:09080+++1'
UNH0000016334368DESADV:D:01B:UN:EAN007'
BGM3510094147783+9'
DTM+137:200801080934:203'
DTM+11:200801080934:203'
DTM+17:200801100000:203'
ALI++168165'
RFF+ON:R-08007E'
DTM+171:20080107:102'
NADSU377996::92'
NADST9418GR::92'
CPS1+5'
PAC9+09::9'
MEAPDAAA+KGM:6306.628'
MEACTNPP+NAR:9'
CPS21+3'
PAC109::9F:CHEP'
MEAPDAAA+KGM:256.828'
PCI+33E'
GINAW393100471000832922'
LIN1+19310047208023:SRV'
QTY+12:44'
DTM+36:20090505:102'
CNT+2:2'
UNT240000016334368'
If you observe the above file which is my resultant file.. I need to count all the segments above UNT and pass the value( here total segments are 24) to D_0074 field .
Is it any way we can count all the segments.. and pass the value??
Kindly suggest me ..
waiting for your replys..
Regards
Seema.

Problem here is ..
They have created only SCv Seebutger_EDI_Adpater
but they haven't created for Seebutger_GENERIC_EDI ..
all those mappings will be under Seebutger_GENERIC_EDI .. which they haven;t installed..
thats the problem..
If any one has that UDF .. kindly let me know..
-Seema.

Problems with missing segment in testing IR

Hi all,
I have an scenario Flat file --> IDOC.
I have created an enhancement for the IDOC. The IDOC name is ZFIDCC1_FAC.FIDCCP02.FIDCCP02.
The IDOC has the segments:   -EDI_DC40
                                                  -E1FIKPF
                                                       -E1FISEG
                                                             -ZE1FICO
I'm testing the interface in the IR and I get the correct result. Now, I´ve change the Message mapping (a sort change, for example change the description), save and activate, and now the result is not ok. In the test lab I can not see the ZE1FICO segment.
I ´ve imported again the IDOC and generated again the metadata in IDX2. Also, I´ve done a Cache refresh in IR and ID, and the result is not ok.
Please, I need your help!!!!!!. I don´t understand what happen.....
Thanks in advance.
Pilar.

I´ve check the IDOC and the segment ZE1FICO does exists, so I think this is not the problem.
After reimporting the IDOC I have reimported the IDOC structure in the target message area. I´ve checked the Design tab and I can see the segment ZE1FICO. Then, I´ve tested using the "Test" tab and the segment ZE1FICO has dissapered.
Thanks in advance.
Pilar.

Problem with Idoc segment maximum length

Hi friends,
We are now creating a new Idoc type. We have started to create the first segment but we encountered a major problem.
The problem is that we have a field of 4000 characters but the limit of all segment fields together is 1000 characters.
Is there any way to change this limitation or another way to define Idoc?
Thanks in advanced,
Udi Dekel.

Hi,
When you create a segment that exceeds the max length, SAP automatically creates a child segment for the exceeded length. For your problem though, you can create 4 segments of length 1000 each and split the data in these 4 segments and then concatenate the data later in the idoc processing function module. On the other hand if it is an outbound idoc, you can ask the receiving system to do the same.
Best regards,
Advait

Problem with profitablity segment

Hi,
we have not defined order as a segment level charecteristic, but it is still creating new segment number for every service order settlement, is there any place where i need to maintain settings to avoid creaation of new profitability segment for every settlement.(all charecteristics of a segment are same in every settlement except order number which is not maintained as a segment level charecteristic) but my system is still taking the order number into consideration and creating new proftability segment for every new order. is there any way to fix this issue.

You need to check the settlement profile and take-offif you have any PA transfer structure assigned in there.

Big problem with ROLLBACK SEGMENT

I tried insert into DB Oracle 8i more than 23000 rows from .sql files.
This files contents:
-- START
delete from grls;
insert ..........
insert ..........
insert ..........
-- END
ORA-01562: failed to extend rollback segment ...
My configuration:
CREATE TABLESPACE rbs datafile '$ORACLE_BASE/oradata1/$ORACLE_SID/rbs01.dbf' SIZE 10M;
CREATE TABLESPACE rbs_02 datafile '$ORACLE_BASE/oradata1/$ORACLE_SID/rbs01_02.dbf' SIZE 300M;
CREATE ROLLBACK SEGMENT rbs01 storage (initial 20k next 20k minextents 3 maxextents 121) TABLESPACE rbs;
CREATE ROLLBACK SEGMENT rbs16 storage (initial 20k next 20k minextents 3 maxextents 121) TABLESPACE rbs;
CREATE ROLLBACK SEGMENT rbs_load01 storage (initial 30m next 30m minextents 3 maxextents 10) TABLESPACE rbs_02;
Please help me.

1.)Did you place the rollback segments online
after creation?
Alter rollback segment RBS01 online;
Alter rollback segment RBS16 online;
Alter rollback segment RBS_LOAD01 online;
2.)Did you set your init[sid].ora parameter
ROLLBACK_SEGMENTS = (RBS01, RBS16, RBS_LOAD01) so that they will automatically come on line on istance startup?
3.) You have set up only 304Meg of space for them cumulatively. Is this enough for the 23thousand rows you want to insert?
If not you may want to enable the autoextend option on your datafiles. Of course you will want to change your maxextents. Leaving that value out will give you a default of 505 maxextents.
4.) And finally you could throw in a commit during the insert procedure. This will commit the transaction at that point and clear out the rollback segments for use again.
Tom

Problems with summing segments

Hi experts,
I have an idoc as source, and I would like to sum the value of a specific segment under a condition:
my idoc is as following:
IDOC
>E1EDP01 0..unbounded
>>E1EDP04 0..unbounded
>>>MSWK
>>>MSWB
for each segment of E1EDP04, if the value of MSWK is the same, then I have to map the sum of all MSWB for the same value of MSWK.
Do you know how to do that? do I have to do an UDF? if yes, how should I start since i'm new at xi and java?
for example, i can have:
IDOC
>E1EDP01
>>E1EDP04
>>>MSWK = code1
>>>MSWB = 5
>E1EDP01
>>E1EDP04
>>>MSWK = code1
>>>MSWB = 7.5
>E1EDP01
>>E1EDP04
>>>MSWK = code1
>>>MSWB = 5
>E1EDP01
>>E1EDP04
>>>MSWK = code2
>>>MSWB = 4
>E1EDP01
>>E1EDP04
>>>MSWK = code2
>>>MSWB = 4.5
then I have to map the sum of MSWB to 2 segments:
>tax
>>type = code1
>> value = 17.5
>tax
>>type = code2
>> value = 8.5
Thanks a lot,
best regards,
jamal

Here's my solution:
step 1: create a UDF called getUniqueValues (queue function)
public void getUniqueValues(String[] MSWK,ResultList result,Container container){
import java.lang.*;
HashSet uniqueSet = new HashSet();
for (int i = 0 ; i < MSWK.length; i++ ) {
 if (uniqueSet.add(MSWK))
 result.addValue(MSWK);
This function returns the unique codes. You'll need this to determine how many tax segments you need and to sum up the values.
step 2: create a UDF called addValues (queue function)
public void addValues(String[] uniqueCodes,String[] allCodes,String[] addVals,ResultList result,Container container){
double sum = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < uniqueCodes.length; i++) {
 for (int j = 0; j < allCodes.length; j++) {
 if (uniqueCodes.equals(allCodes[j])) {
 sum = sum + Double.parseDouble(addVals[j]);
 result.addValue(""+sum);
 sum = 0;
This function adds the values for each unique code as and returns them in a single context.
Step 3: the mapping of the tax segment: [http://www.xs4all.nl/~iddor/tax.jpg]
Set the context of MSWK to the parent segment of EDP01, in this case that is MT_SDN
Step 4: map field type like this: [http://www.xs4all.nl/~iddor/type.jpg]
Step 5: map the value field: [http://www.xs4all.nl/~iddor/value.jpg]
Set the contexts to the parent segment of EDP01, in this case that is MT_SDN. Add a context change between each value and you're done.

Pb with rollback segment

Hi guys.
Am using oracle 8i and am having problems with rollbackup segment. My rbs tablespace is 35GB and will like to shrink it! Its a production db, so my question is shoudl I fire the below query?
alter rollback segment SYSTEM shrink;
alter rollback segment RBS__BIG shrink;
alter rollback segment RBS01 shrink;
alter rollback segment RBS02 shrink;
alter rollback segment RBS03 shrink;
alter rollback segment RBS04 shrink;
alter rollback segment RBS05 shrink;
alter rollback segment RBS06 shrink;
Is there any downside? Please advice.
Thanks.

Hi Friend,
Production DBs are always having big transactions, These transactions obviously hold large memory in rollback segments. You will not face any issue after srinking it but if any transaction is failed and it has not been enrolled or flush out from your rollback segment. You will be not able to recover the data from rollback segment. I would suggest use share table space here instead of shrinking it. Atleast it will help to to recover current transaction in case of calamity.
Thanks,
Nitin joshi

Problems with Idoc Artmas03 to create a variant

Hi everyone, We had created a individual material through Idoc artmas03, we need to create a variant, we have problems with some segments E1BPE1VARKEY & E1BP1AUSPRT, our problem is how to create a variant & how to full this segments, is this correct from Idoc Armas03? or is it necesary another Idoc? Some have some examples, thank you very much
Best Regards from Mexico,
Atte Israel

Guys,
I am running mozilla firefoz 5.0 and the only option that is coming to me is to create folder in CA.
even though SAP recommands IE and allows portal from Mozilla, the later seems to have serious issues with Portal.
I remember working with several versions of mozilla, sometimes you right click, all option will come but you will be unable to choose options coz when u bring cursor to them they will skid here and there..
I hope no SAP note elobrates this as of now.
Ankur

Oracle 11g problem with creating shared memory segments

Hi, i'm having some problems with the oracle listener, when i'm trying to start it or reload it I get the follow error massages:
TNS-01114: LSNRCTL could not perform local OS authentication with the listener
TNS-01115: OS error 28 creating shared memory segment of 129 bytes with key 2969090421
My system is a: SunOS db1-oracle 5.10 Generic_144489-06 i86pc i386 i86pc (Total 64GB RAM)
Current SGA is set to:
Total System Global Area 5344731136 bytes
Fixed Size 2233536 bytes
Variable Size 2919238464 bytes
Database Buffers 2399141888 bytes
Redo Buffers 24117248 bytes
prctl -n project.max-shm-memory -i process $$
process: 21735: -bash
NAME PRIVILEGE VALUE FLAG ACTION RECIPIENT
project.max-shm-memory
privileged 64.0GB - deny
I've seen that a solution might be "Make sure that system resources like shared memory and heap memory are available for LSNRCTL tool to execute properly."
I'm not exactly sure how to check that there is enough resources?
I've also seen a solution stating:
"Try adjusting the system-imposed limits such as the maximum number of allowed shared memory segments, or their maximum and minimum sizes. In other cases, resources need to be freed up first for the operation to succeed."
I've tried to modify the "max-sem-ids" parameter and set it to recommended 256 without any success and i've kind of run out of options what the error can be?
/Regards

I see, I do have the max-shm-ids quite high already so it shouldn't be a problem?
user.oracle:100::oracle::process.max-file-descriptor=(priv,4096,deny);
process.max-stack-size=(priv,33554432,deny);
project.max-shm-memory=(priv,68719476736,deny)

Problems with Natural Account segment while creating new SOB

Hello everybody,
I am testing a new GL SOB implementation in our test Instance. Below are the steps I followed.
1)Created a new calender with 12 periods.
2)Enabled Curriencies.
3)Created a New AFF Structure with 4 segments.
5)Created Value sets for those 4 segments and.
6)Assigned Value sets to the Segments.
7)Created LOV for the Value sets for the segments.
8)Assigned Flexfield Qualifiers for the segments.
segment1-Balance, SEG2-Natural Account, SEG3-Cost Center Accout &SEG-4 NO qualifier.
9)Saved, Froze and Compiled the AFF Structure.
10)Navigated to SETUP, FINANCIALS, BOOKS & DEFINE to create a new SOB.
11)After entering all the details including Calender, COA, Currencies in the Closing Tab when entering the Account details for Retained Earnings, the AFF takes all the values for all the segments except for segment-2 which has been qualified as a Natural segment.
12) I repeated the process by creating a new COA and it wont take the segment values which has been qualified as Natural Account. It gives me an error saying that No Entries Found For List Of Values and I double checked the Value List and Values and they are there.
What am I doing wrong? I badly need some input here.
Thank you.

Hi
1. How many values you have defined in Natural Account Segment Values.
2. Could you please check while defining the Values there is check box called
enabled. Have to checked it. Normally it is checked by default.
Regards

Problem in IDOC segment E1MTXLM

Hi all,
Basic type : MATMAS05
One of the segments is E1MTXLM has the data as below
"Heater assy., with NTC <(>&<)> protector, 240V, 3000W"
where as in the MM03 transaction Basic data text is shown as below
"Heater assy., with NTC & protector, 240V, 3000W"
I think there is problem while the IDOC is getting created but i have no idea what could be the problem.
Can any help in this regard.

Hi Nejuma,
I don't think there is any problem with cofiguration settings.u r getting the idocs for some vendors .
if iam not wrong u r giving LS in the tcode(we20).The method which u r using is change pointers.As u r using standard idoc all the settings will be done.
Only settings u have to do is
1>generate partner profiles(WE20)
2>Distribute model view(BD64).
REGARDS,
Nagaraj

Tutorial about how to extend the bdoc activity_object with own segments

Hi!
We had lots of problems with the things described in this subject here.
Worse: We can't solve the problems and now we're going another way for our mobile-crm-solution...
Are there any how-to-guides or tutorials anywhere online about how to extend standard bdocs with own segments?
How-to-guides about mbdocs and sbdocs and how they are playing together?
Thanks a lot in advance.
Best regards,
Ingo

Hi lngo,
I would suggest you use EEWB to enhance the Activity object. There is the provision of enhancing the Mobile sbdocs directly from EEWB.
This way you don't have to spend lots of efforts in developments.
When you create extension in EEWB, for input fields select the appropriate values mention below:
EEW Bus. Obj: BUSINESS_ACTIVITY
Extension Type: ACTIVITY_H
On Next Screen enter screen title and press continue.
On Next screen select 'Business Activity' and continue.
Enter the fields required on next screen and continue.
Further on next screen define if fields should be releavant for header, item or both.
and on the next screen select 'Mobile' so that sbdocs are accordingly modified.
Best Regards,
Pratik Patel.
Reward with points if it is of any help to you!

BAPI_ACC_BILLING_POST with PA segment

Hi:
We are developing an ABAP and we would like to use BAPI_ACC_BILLING_POST, for FB01 tx, but I have some problem when I want to use it with PA segment.
Do you have an example of this bapi wich includes data for PA segment. We need to populate data for Product, Nielsen ID, Materialu2026 as PA objects.
Thanks in advance for your help.

Hi Richard,
How did you this problem? I am facing the similiar problem.
I want to Save FI Cash Journal Documents using the BAPI
BAPI_CASHJOURNALDOC_CREATE.
On the line item there is Profitability segment which comes as a pop up in transaction FBCJ.
I was not able to find the interface for this Profitability segment (CO-PA entry) in the above mentioned BAPI
Kindly reply me on [email protected] if you have any help to offer.
Thanks in Advance,
Manish

POSTING_INTERFACE_DOCUMENT with PA segments/CO-PA

Does anybody able post the document using function module POSTING_INTERFACE_DOCUMENT with PA Character ( CO-PA) segment(Product,Brand, equipment type). If so, can you please suggest me.
Iam using the structure "CE01000" which was in FB01 screen but iam getting the error screen field is un known.
Thanks.

Thanks Rob, profit center, cost center and IOs are taken care. only concerned with PA segments. Function module is not understanding the structures for PA segments.

Problem with segment segment E1EDK18

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for