Problem with Unit of measurement

Hi,
I am having problem with Unit of measurement with different languages.
Eg:
In SPRO, I am able to see the unit of measure T3 Description: (Trading unit). in SAP 200 client .the logon language is EN(english).
But if I logon into same client(200) with different language DE(german) version, I am not able to see the description in German, the description field is blank.
Kindly give me a solution for this problem as it is very urgent.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Shankar

Hi Aishwarya,
I can think of 2 possibilities:
1. You need to verify passing the Target UoM with the ISO Code as well as the update flag in the 'X' structures.
2. The material that you are trying to pass some UoM does not have the conversion maintained in the Material Master. (Base UoM --> Target UoM conversion in Material Master, contact Functional Consultant).
Also, if you can verify by performing the action manually and check if the Sales Order is getting created manually with the Target UoM .
Regards,
Pranav.

Similar Messages

Problem with unit in Query

Hallo Experts,
We encounter a problem with unit in our Query.
Szenario:
We use the Unit like PC, SET in Query.
In Table T006 those Units have value 0 in the field ANDEC, so they will be rounded up and rounded down in Query.
Our Problem is some Queries need the rounding up and down but others don't need this function.
Where and how should we change to solve the problem.
thanks & Best regards

hi,
if you want to control the rounding off while unit conversion you can do it from SPRO
In the BW system, goto SPRO -> SAP NetWeaver -> General Settings -> Check Units of Measurement -> Units of Measurement -> Choose the unit corresponding to 'KM' -> Click on 'Details' button in the toolbar.
Look the field 'Decimal Pl rounding'. Change this to 3 or whatever value you choose and see if it works.
in above link i have taken example of KM, you need need to select the required unit.
let us know if this is solves your problem. I am not sure if this can be done for individual queries but this is controlled by UOM wise as mentioned above.
Regards,
Rk.

PO outbound IDOC - Issue with Unit of measure

Hi,
I am facing issue with unit of measure.
1) In the PO outbound idoc in segment E1EDP01, the unit is always converted into ISO code and sent. Is there any way to avoid it.
2) Now while changing unit to ISO code, it checks if it is preset in T006 table. Now in some of the cases like Unit FT3, there are no entries in T006 table, hence IDOC is going into error. Let me know how can this be resolved. Do I need to update T006 table if yes then how can I do it.
Thanks.
Regards,
Shahu

Sorry.. Posting it in ABAP Development forum.

PO outbound interface - Issue with Unit of measure

Hi,
I am facing issue with unit of measure.
1) In the PO outbound idoc in segment E1EDP01, the unit is always converted into ISO code and sent. Is there any way to avoid it.
2) Now while changing unit to ISO code, it checks if it is preset in T006 table. Now in some of the cases like Unit FT3, there are no entries in T006 table, hence IDOC is going into error. Let me know how can this be resolved. Do I need to update T006 table if yes then how can I do it.
Thanks.
Regards,
Shahu
Edited by: shahuraj shirure on Mar 5, 2008 1:06 AM

Its always that while sending Units from SAP, it needs to be sent in ISO code and SAP always receives units of measure in the ISO unit format only.

Problem of unit of measurment in production system

Hi Friends,
I'm facing a peculiar problem of unit of measurement like error in all quantity and curreny fields in report output after transporting a query from quality system to production system but this query is generated from multiprovdier. what might be the problem.
Regards,
Srinivas.

Hi Dave,
Thanks for ur reply. but to trace in monitor it is not showing any error message.
My Mail ID is [email protected] Please the send the document
Regards,
bharat

Conversion Problem in Unit of measure 1PAC=100,000 EA

Hi Experts,
I am facing the problem in conversion of Unit of Measures.
If some material has the conversion unit when we order to Vendor.
The Unit of measure is EA, the Order unit is PAC.
The conversion is 1PAC=100,000 EA
But the System is allowing as 1PAC=10,000 EA only and it is not allowing to enter 100,000 EA and throughing the error
Entry too long (enter in the format __,___)
Message no. 00089
How can we increase the characters of the Unit of measure. Like this we have some 50 Materials, I need to increase the length of the conversion spaces. How to do it, Please guide me.
rgds
Swamy

Hi
you can check this out the denominator factor is Stored in structure - SMEINH - field UMREN.
Best option is to maintain decimal place for the UOM , which is more easier to mainatin.
Even if you go through the note the same is explained. Please read below for Too large numerators and denominators
When 120000 CM3 = 0,2 tons (TO), you can no longer save numerator and denominator of conversion ratio 600000 CM3 = 1 TO as numerator and denominator may have maximally five digits.
Here, you must either select a larger volume unit or a smaller unit of weight: With DM3 the conversion ratio would be 600 DM3 = 1 TO, with KG the conversion ratio would be 600 CM3 = 1 KG.
Generally, the alternative units of measure and the base unit of measure should result in quantities that are in the same dimension since the conversion factors may not be larger than 99999/1 and not smaller than 1/99999.
Thanks & Regards
KK
Edited by: Kishore Kumar Chiluka on Apr 22, 2008 8:25 AM

Error with Unit of Measure 'CAR' ISO Code

Hi gurus,
My client has EDI setup for POs for a vendor. Whenever they create a PO for a specific material with Ordering UoM as 'CAR' (carton), output is going into errors and no Idoc was generated. The error message refers to 'ME764' - "Not possible to determine ISO code for unit of measure CAR in item 00090". But, ISO code was perfectly defined for the UoM CAR (I checked in CUNI). When debugged, I found that the UoM CAR has an internal format as 'KAR' and SAP standard function module 'UNIT_OF_MEASURE_SAP_TO_ISO' is looking for ISO code of 'KAR' and throwing this error message for 'CAR'. Have you guys ever faced similar problem and any solution for this behaviour? We use SAP ECC 6.

hi
go to CUNI
select ISO codes give new entry for CAR
then save and come back in CUNI select the UOM then double click onur unit at right u will get field of ISO code give iso code here and save
regards
kunal

Round off problem in unit of measurement

Dear Experts
We are in SAP 4.7 , we are having more than 12 plants using same client.
One of our plant requirement we were changed the UOM 'Nos' with 3 decimels allowed.So where ever we not useing decimel places we have to use UOM as 'EA' (each).This is dont have any decimel places.
Now we are in implementation project for our one more new plant in same client. But for them we are going to introduced Batch specific unit of measurement. Base unit of measurement is KG and Batch specific UOM is EA.
All sale material have both unit of measurement , inward or production posting in KG and we will create batch number. We will enter the coversion value of how many quantity per kg for each batch.This will be in 'EA'
While i'm doing transfer posting or consumption or sales for the material in UOM 'EA' , it is coming with 3 decimel places.
If the same UOM 'EA' in normal condition (without batch specific UOM) it is working correctly.It is getting roundoff correctly.
Please help me out on this.I need the consumption should not be decimel places for UOM 'EA'.
Suresh

Hi Senthilkumar SD,
You have not read the thread before posting.
It quite clearly states that the UOM EA already has NO DECIMAL PLACES.
Quote "<b>we have to use UOM as 'EA' (each).This is dont have any decimel places."</b>
It is good to see lots of people trying to help and so I am pleased to see you trying, but it really doesn't help if you haven't read the question before posting the answer.
Steve B

Pricing Record Problem (alternative Unit of Measure)

I am facing a problem in Pricing i.e that the Price is mainly maintained in Base unit of measure(CRT) but the selling is both in Crates and Bottels and the bottels is alternate UOM and Crate is the main unit of measure 90 % sales in crates. but when i enter the qty in alternative uom i.e is bottel price is not calcuated propery
Example
1 crt 24 bt
Price of one crate =216
when i enter bottels as uom the price should be 9 but system is showing 9.07

Hi
Litres is the Base unit of measure and Bottles and Carats are Sales unit of Measure in Ur case and u have maintained wrong figures
Please maintained in this fashion
1) 1 bottle = x litres
2) 1 carat = y litres
in this way when u enter the 1 carat in Sales order system will go here and take the price of 1 litre and then multiply by ( This conversion factor in ur case y units)
so u will get price as 1*y rs .
In pricing please check what condition record u have maintained . Generally condition records are maintained in Base unit of measure i.e the condition record will say 1litre cost Rs 11 .
Hope this calrify .
Please reward -

Calc problem with fact table measure used as part of bridge table model

Hi all,
I'm experiencing problems with the calculation of a fact table measure ever since I've used it as part of a calculation in a bridge table relationship.
In a fact table, PROJECT_FACT, I had a column (PROJECT_COST) whose default aggregate was SUM. Whenever PROJECT_COST was used with any dimension, the proper aggregation was done at the proper levels. But, not any longer. One of the relationships PROJECT_FACT has is with a dimension, called PROJECT.
PROJECT_FACT contains details of employees and each day they worked on a PROJECT_ID. So for a particular day, employee, Joe, might have a PROJECT_COST of $80 for PROJECT_ID 123, on the next day, Joe might have $40 in PROJECT_COST for the same project.
Dimension table, PROJECT, contains details of the project.
A new feature was added to the software - multiple customers can now be charged for a PROJECT, where as before, only one customer was charged.
This percentage charge break-down is in a new table - PROJECT_BRIDGE. PROJECT_BRIDGE has the PROJECT_ID, CUSTOMER_ID, BILL_PCT. BILL_PCT will always add up to 1.
So, the bridge table might look like...
PROJECT_ID CUSTOMER_ID BILL_PCT
123          100     .20
123          200     .30
123          300     .50
456 400 1.00
678 400 1.00
Where for project 123, is a breakdown for multiple customers (.20, .30. .50).
Let's say in PROJECT_FACT, if you were to sum up all PROJECT_COST for PROJECT_ID = 123, you get $1000.
Here are the steps I followed:
- In the Physical layer, PROJECT_FACT has a 1:M with PROJECT_BRIDGE as does PROJECT to PROJECT_BRIDGE (a 1:M).
PROJECT_FACT ===> PROJECT_BRIDGE <=== PROJECT
- In the Logical layer, PROJECT has a 1:M with PROJECT_FACT.
PROJECT ===> PROJECT_FACT
- The fact logical table source is mapped to the bridge table, PROJECT_BRIDGE, so now it has multiple tables it maps to (PROJECT_FACT & PROJECT_BRIDGE). They are set for an INNER join.
- I created a calculation measure, MULT_CUST_COST, using physical columns, that calculates the sum of the PROJECT_COST X the percentage amount in the bridge table. It looks like: SUM(PROJECT_FACT.PROJECT_COST * PROJECT_BRIDGE.BILL_PCT)
- I brought MULT_CUST_COST into the Presentation layer.
We still want the old PROJECT_COST around until it get's phased out, so it's in the Presentation layer as well.
Let's say I had a request with only PROJECT_ID, MULT_CUST_COST (the new calculation), and PROJECT_COST (the original). I'd expect:
PROJECT_ID MULT_CUST_COST PROJECT_COST
123          $1000     $1000
I am getting this for MULT_CUST_COST, however, for PROJECT_COST, it's tripling the value (possibly because there are 3 percent amounts?)...
PROJECT_ID MULT_CUST_COST PROJECT_COST
123          $1000 (correct)      $3000 (incorrect, it's been tripled)
If I were to look at the SQL, it would have:
          SELECT SUM(PROJECT_COST),
SUM(PROJECT_FACT.PROJECT_COST * PROJECT_BRIDGE.BILL_PCT),
               PROJECT_ID
          FROM ...
          GROUP BY PROJECT_ID
PROJECT_COST used to work correctly before modeling a bridge table.
Any ideas on what I did wrong?
Thanks!

Hi
Phew, what a long question!
If I understand correctly I think the problem lies with your old cost measure, or rather combining that with you new one in the same request. If you think about it, your query as explained above will bring back 3 rows from the database which is why your old cost measure is being multiplied. I suspect that if you took it out of the query, your bridge table would be working properly for the new measure alone?
I would consider migrating your historic data into the bridge table model so that you have a single type of query. For the historic data each would have a single row in the bridge with a 1.0 BILL_PCT.
Best of luck,
Paul
http://total-bi.com

Problem with unit converter widget

I am having a weird problem with my unit converter widget on 10.4.9.
I re-installed my system, and now when I go to open the unit converter widget, I can no longer see the British pound currency, there are all these othere European currencies.
Is there anyway to get the British pound currency back, do I need to re-install the widget, and how do I do that.

Then I'd try removing & reinstalling it...
http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=301629
If it's one that came with OSX, you may have to get pacifist to extract it from your install Disk.

Problem with "unite" option in illustrator

Hello,
I have problem with new Illustrator. I get distorted shapes after using "unite" in pathfinder or when rescaling, often shapes get distorted when expanding strokes to shapes, what is going on? I use illustrator for quite some time and never had anything like this. Screenshots attached.
Also I need to updade software through CC app each time I turn computer on, update seems not to register somehow.
Please Help
Kamil

Kamil,
In cases like this, the first guess is Align to Pixel Grid
You may select everything and then untick Align to Pixel Grid in the Transform pallete, and also untick Align New Objects to Pixel Grid in the flyout options.
You may avoid document types with that as default (RGB for web and the like) or change the default for such documents.

Problems with write to measurement

My project group has some problems with the write to measurement VI.
Firstly, for each of the SOC/Voltage...each file only has one value, how to make all value inside one file?
Secondly,How to make all the different parameters, such as SOC1, SOC2, Voltage1, Voltage2, appear in one excel file for easier reference?
Attachments:
TwoBatteries.vi ‏246 KB

Look at your settings for the Write to Measurement File. You are telling it to save to one file, and then use next available filename. Try append to file.
Also, use Merge Signals to combine the 4 and write to a single Write to Measurement File. Right now you have 4 identical ones with the same file name. They are stepping all over each other.
When using the Write to Measurment File, try opening up the help file and reading it o understand what each setting does.

Problem in Unit of measure

Dear Guru,
There is a problem with one material
One material on jan converion ( material master) should change
1 to 7.369 to 1 to 6.39
at the end of feb order is created for that material, Now po will take the old conversion
at the time of R&D iam deleting the info record from Po, then it will take right conversion
Please suggest me why it is happened
Regards
Kashyap Kumar

1 to 7.369 to 1 to 6.39 is this convertion maintained info record.if yes ,after deleting inforecord system will pick convertion from material master.Check inforecord what convertion factor maintained.

Problem with Write To Measurement File Express VI not writing to file if file was deleted after the first call (7.1)

I'm using the Express Write to LabVIEW Measurement File in LV7.1.
I have it set to "Save to one file" and have tried both "Overwrite file" and "Using next available file name" for the "If a file already exists" conditions.
The path/filename is passed into the function.
It works fine the first time around. If the file is deleted before the function is called again, an error occurs since LV is unable to find the file.
I have had to stop and re-run my program in order to write to use the function again.
Since I am able to delete the file I assume it was closed but it seems like LV expects it to be there, even though the function was supposed to create/open/close the file... Is there any way to reset this without stopping/restarting the program?
Since my application creates several files (only one using the Express VI) I am checking for the filenames and requiring that they be deleted (or a new filename be used) before acquiring data. Everything has worked great, except for the Express VI.
Thank you,
David

Ok, I've edited the VI you posted to reproduce my error (this time with 8.0).
I added a "master stop" and "start log" button. To demonstrate my problem:
1. Run the VI
2. Click "START LOGGING" - c:\test.txt is created
3. Click "STOP" - c:\test.txt is closed
4. Delete the file c:\test.txt with Windows shell or explorer
5. Click "START LGGING" - a new c:\test.txt file should be created but instead an error is raised in the Write LabVIEW Measurement File function.
Any ideas?
Thanks,
Dave
Attachments:
Write LV Meas File 2.vi ‏96 KB

Problem with Unit of measurement

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for