Problem with Valuation Variant

Hi FICO experts,
Im getting the following error when creating the Production Order.
"No valuation variant found for valuation area BP01"
Pls help and i assure to reward for suitable solutions.
Regards
Tanya

Hi
When you create a Production Order , there is an automatic assignment of Costing variant, the systems tries to read the valuation variant through. Check transaction OPL1 for the costing variant shown in the Production order. Rectify or assign the valuation the valuation variant, your problem will be sorted out.
Anand.

Similar Messages

  • Problems with Image Variants

    I got two problems with Image Variants:
    1. catalogCache.GetImagePath("Images", id) doesn’t work for some id. The error message is “GetImageVariant error”.
    2. catalogCache.Preload("Images", “Original”)
        catalogCache.Preload("Images", “Thumbnails”)
        catalogCache.Preload("Images", null)
       catalogCache.Preload("Images", "")
    get failed, the status code is -2147483647
    Anyone know how to setup  image variants?
    Thanks.
    Forrest

    status code: -2147483647 is RC_BADPARAM.

  • Problem with transaction variant

    Hi Gurus,
    I want to create transaction variant for XD01 transaction and make district field mandatory.
    I have done it using transaction SHD0 and its showing effects when i test it from SHD0.
    But I cant see its effect in actual transaction XD01.
    Please guide.
    Thanks in advance,
    Supriya.

    Hi,
    The transaction variant created by SHD0 when activated will change the display of tcode SM37, irrespective of whether it is called directly or from a Z program. If you are calling SM37 from Z program, try
    SUBMIT SAPLBTCH VIA SELECTION-SCREEN WITH SELECTION-TABLE rspar_tab AND RETURN.

  • Problem with trnsaction variant

    Hi Gurus,
    I want to create transaction variant for XD01 transaction and make district field mandatory.
    I have done it using transaction SHD0 and its showing effects when i test it from SHD0.
    But I cant see its effect in actual transaction XD01.
    Please guide.
    Thanks in advance,
    Supriya.

    Hi,
    The transaction variant created by SHD0 when activated will change the display of tcode SM37, irrespective of whether it is called directly or from a Z program. If you are calling SM37 from Z program, try
    SUBMIT SAPLBTCH VIA SELECTION-SCREEN WITH SELECTION-TABLE rspar_tab AND RETURN.

  • Valuation price with user exit/BADI/Enhancement Spot (In valuation variant)

    Hi all,
    i am facing problem finding enhancement when creation of sales order of Valuation price with user exit/BADI/Enhancement Spot  (In valuation variant)
    For refferenece:
    When going to t.code VA03, select one item and go to extras in the menu bar and select costing then you find some amounts calculation i.e valuation price automatically.
    So when creation of sales order i am giving material and that material price automatically takes from material master and creating sales order.
    My customer requirement is to get the valuation price of the input material from Z-table during the sales order cost estimate.
    This Z-table contains the material code, plant , grade  of the material.
    Ex:
    Material         Plant   Grade Price
    A                1000    XYZ     25000
    A                1000    PQR     35000
    A                1000    BCD     45000
    Suppose it depends on sales document type and which grade price i have to take.
    So first of all i am unable to find enhancement where to change this code to get change the valuation price.
    Does anybody have any idea , is there any user exit/BADI/enhancement for this.
    So please help me in this issue.
    Thanks & Regards,
    lokeshgoud

    pls allow me to post the questions

  • Report Painter problem with empty selection variant

    Hello,
    I use the cost center selection variant for the column definition in Report Painter as characteristic value. This selection variant get only the cost centers which are valid from 1.1.2003 to 31.12.2004. The column of the report created by Report Painter which uses this selection variant display value without taking into account limitations follow from this selection variant. I expect value zero for year fiscal year 2007 in this column, because the cost centers are invalid in 2007 year but the report displays different value. The problem appeared after upgrade from 4.6C to ECC 6.0.
    Best Regards
    ZD

    My problem with Report Painter occurred when I was creating my own report based on 1VK library.
    In my example I used in the column definition characteristic Cost
    Center, which is determined by selection variant, and Basic Key Figure
    equal SWKG-Costs. For system date (18.07.2007) there are no valid
    master data for the characteristic Cost Center but when I execute
    report for fiscal year 2007 the column display no-zero value without
    taking into account value of Characteristic Cost Center. I expected
    zero value in this column because there are no postings for Cost
    Centers (no valid cost centers were selected) in financial year 2007.
    Could you help me with this problem ?

  • Problems with Idoc Artmas03 to create a variant

    Hi everyone, We had created a individual material through Idoc artmas03, we need to create a variant, we have problems with some segments E1BPE1VARKEY & E1BP1AUSPRT, our problem is how to create a variant & how to full this segments, is this correct from Idoc Armas03? or is it necesary another Idoc? Some have some examples, thank you very much
    Best Regards from Mexico,
    Atte Israel

    Guys,
    I am running mozilla firefoz 5.0 and the only option that is coming to me is to create folder in CA.
    even though SAP recommands IE and allows portal from Mozilla, the later seems to have serious issues with Portal.
    I remember working with several versions of mozilla, sometimes you right click, all option will come but you will be unable to choose options coz when u bring cursor to them they will skid here and there..
    I hope no SAP note elobrates this as of now.
    Ankur

  • Problem with variants ?

    hi,
    while  working on the project
    I m getting the same problem again and again with the variants i.e "Maintain the variants for the deletion program first".
    as the main requirement of the project is to archive the documents through the Transaction SARA .
    pls help.

    Hi,
    For archiving the things first you need to maintain the variant in which the details regarding material document has to be put.
    suppose you want to archive material codes then first you have to go to MM71 and provide material codes by creating variants and then you can go to SARA and do rest of the procedure.
    Regards,
    sunny

  • Problems with bill copying control and materials with variant configuration

    Hi experts,
    I have a problem with a bill copying control and the way that my customer is trying to create and print the Bill (VF01).
    Let me explain...They have in a Sales Order a material with variant configuration per position, each one can have many characteristics. This characteristics must be printing on the billing document, creating different bills 'coz the max. lines number is 18, so the bill must change page per material-characteristics.
    Example:
    Max. Number Lines = 3
    Position 10      
    Material A     
         -Characteristic A
         -Characteristic B
         -Characteristic C     (Bill 1) 
         -Characteristic D
         -Characteristic E
         -Characteristic F     (Bill 2)
    Position 20
    Material B     
         -Characteristic A     (Bill 3) counting characteristics upside
         -Characteristic B
         -Characteristic C
         -Characteristic D     (Bill 4)
    I created on Tx VOFM (Data Transfer-Billing documents) a routine trying to control this jump, but my problem is when I'm creating the Bill document (VF01) this work only by position, the debugging enter per position.. so I don't have any control to tell the program must count the characteristics and create another bill.
    So... Somebody can help me..or have any idea to solve this problem.....
    Thxs a lot!!!!
    Diego Helfer

    HI Diego
      For our coming assignment, we do have similar sort of situation. Currently we are in Requirements Gathering phase.
      Though we do not have Variant Configuration in place, we do have restriction for no..of items to be used for printing in Billing Documents.
      Current proposal is that we will restrict at Sales Order Creation. If the number of items are increasing, we will restrict saving the document and loading has to be done again. As itz better to restrict at initial phase.
      Our schema is One Sales Order -> One Delivery -> One Billig Document.
       Will post if we can manage to acheive some other way and do request you the same.
    Kind Regards
    Eswar

  • Inventory problem for material with valuation category X

    Hi!
    During annual inventory, I found material in a storage location that doesn't exist in SAP as material master.
    I have created the material, managed in batches and valuation category X.
    I have created a batch with MSC1N and now I am trying to create an inventory document to put this material on stock; but when I am trying to create the inventory document with MI01 or MI31, the system is telling me :
    "Batch  0000043183   does not contain a valuation type
    Message no. M7045
    Diagnosis
    The material is subject to split valuation, but the batch entered has not been assigned to a valuation type.
    System Response
    Any transaction/event that has the effect of changing the stock balance will be rejected for this batch.
    Procedure
    Contact your system administrator.
    If you are authorized to do so, do you wish to check the valuation category in the material master record?
    Do you want to display the batch?"
    Now, I don't know exactly what can I do to be able to create the inventory document.
    Any ideas.....
    Thanks

    Since you have created a material master with valuation category that means the system is taking that material either as split valuated or to-be split valuated...the reason of this error you will find out if you go to MSC2N with material-batch & plant you will find in the Basic data 1 tab that Valuation type field is mandatory...so either you have to split valuate the item further and then enter the same valuation type in MSC2N or otherwise if you not still done any transaction with the material master then remove the valuation category from the material master
    Regards,
    Indranil

  • Wrong priority, valuation variants

    Hi all,
    We are having two costing variants and valuation variants (maintained in transaction code OKP8), one for ordinary calculation and one for planning. The one for ordinary we have the following priority:
    1. L Price from purchasing info record
    2. 4 Planned Price 1
    3. 1 Standard price in previous period
    Sub-strategy: A Quotation Price via Condition Table
    For the planning valuation variant we have the following priority:
    1. L Price from purchasing info record
    2. 4 Planned Price 1
    3. 7 Valuation price according to price control in Mat. Master
    4. 1 Standard price in previous period
    Sub-strategy: A Quotation Price via Condition Table
    Our problem is that; for the planning valuation variant the system choose priority 3, 7 Valuation price according to price control in Mat. Master instead of the info record that we have maintained. Planning price is not maintained thatu2019s why the system don´t choose that price. For the ordinary valuation variant the system choose priority 1. L Price from purchasing info record.
    We wonder if:
    1.Is that not possible to choose price from purchasing info record in two valuation variants, that you can´t combine this two?
    2.If this not is possible, are we forced to maintain a planning price?
    Best regards Lisa

    Hi,
    In your case as u have two different costing variants, generally there wont be any issue in having two different valuation variants for these two.
    Genearlly system picks up the purchase info record even for plan based on the valuation variant u assigned.
    Picking up the purchase inforecord is based on MM settings for material sourcing. check with MM how they maintained. Also recheck u r routing in planning.
    Regards
    Sudhakar Reddy

  • Third party process with Valuated sales order stock

    Hi All,
    We have third party sales order process with valuated sales order stock. The problem is that in the theird party PR which is triggered directly from the sales order it determines a stock account which is assigned to the BSX key in OBYC.
    But since this is third party processing as per my understanding a consumption account assigned to key GBB-VAX (since account assignmnt category is X) should get determined, so that when the GR is done against the PO a consumption posting is done in the background.
    I am not able to understand if the system is determining the stock account due to the fact that it is valuated sales order stock and if so, what should happen after GR. Should we have a stock created for the material which is physically directly delivered to the customer?
    Regards,
    V S

    Hi,
    Check GBB-VKA which is defined in OME9 for your ''E'' Account Assignment Category that SAP will debit upon GR posting
    Also check "X" GBB-VAX and the G/L account assignment in OBYC
    The posting on GR should be debit KBS -Credit GR-IR
    Thanks
    Diwakar

  • Problems with spaces in file or directory names and Word.exe

    Hi
    I'm trying to open a file with Word from my java aplication, and I have a problem with some file/directory names.
    I have this
    String cmd = "c:\\Program Files\\Microsoft Office\\Office10\\WINWORD.EXE" + " " + path;
    try {
    Runtime.getRuntime().exec(cmd);
    } catch (Exception errorea){ }
    Here is what happens:
    if path is something like this: "c:\people\info.doc" , there's no problem, Word opens the document, but if path contains blank spaces somewhere, it doesn't work. For example:
    path = "c:\Documents and Settings\info.doc"
    path = "c:\Hi everybody\info.doc"
    path = "c:\tests\test results.doc"
    with the above examples it doesn't work :( Word tries to open "c:\Documents", "c:\Hi" or "c:\tests\test".
    Can anyone help? thanx a lot ! : )

    Hint: use the variant Runtime.exec(String[] args).
    Create a command array, with each token in a separate argument. The entire filename with spaces goes into one argument.

  • FAGL_FC_VAL -problem with KDB and KDF -KDB config is superceding KDF config

    Hello experts,
    The configuration of account determination for FAGL_FC_VAL is done using the transaction keys KDB and KDF. KDB is used to maintain account determination in case of non OI balance sheet accounts and KDF is used to maintain account determination in case of Open Item and Subledger accounts.
    From what I know and have seen in my earlier clients the processing logic by SAP is -
    1.         KDF first and secondly
    Table: T030HB  with valuation area
    Table: T030H   without valaution area
    In case no relevant KDF entry is found - by checking the entries of
    2.        KDB
    Table: T030S
    But over here at my current client, the above processing sequence is not being followed - on checking the postings generated by FAGL_FC_VAL for non OI balance sheet GL accounts, I find that the account for posting balance sheet adjustment is not being picked from the KDF config but rather the balance sheet adjustment posting is going to the same GL account (being driven by theKDB config). I have checked all the above 3 tables and things look pretty normal to me. I am maintaining same GL account in both the config because in some company code this GL is open item and in some this is a non OI account.
    It's a strange problem because system is not behaving correctly, if account determination for a non OI Balance Sheet GL account is maintained in both KDF and KDB then it's the KDF config that gets the first successful hit and drives the posting.
    Problem is compounded by the fact that this issue is happening only in production system and things are working as expected in quality system. I have checked the config in both systems and they are the same.
    Has any of you faced this problem before or if you can point me to the right direction then it would be greatly apprecited.
    Thanks!

    HI
    Some time...some  request number  not release properly ....due that reason all the configuration may not be transfer...Ask your Basis person ...again Rerelease the all the request numbers..after that all the configuration will be replace
    I hope it will helps
    Regards
    vamsi

  • Problem with IDoc for an outbound delivery

    Dear All,
    I am facing a problem with the IDoc defined for an outbound delivery.
    Scenario:
    Implementation of a small enhancement for an IDoc (DESADV, DELVRY01) created for an outbound delivery (in VL02N).
    What I did:
    I implemented the EXIT_SAPLV56K_002 exit in the V56K0001 enhancement, activated in SMOD, assigned V56K0001 component in CMOD and acivated it. Then I put a breakpoint on the ZXTRKU02 include. For me everything in SMOD and CMOD looks OK.
    I have also created a partner profile, port, outbound message config. (message DESADV, basic type DELVRY01, application V2, output message type LAVA, process code DELV. function module used for this process code is IDOC_OUTPUT_DELVRY).
    What I can do:
    I can issue an IDoc message, it looks ok and contains the standard data.
    Problem:
    It seems that the enhancement does not work. Finally I put there only one line of code to avoid a program bug and just to check . The system does not stop at the breakpoint (set on the ZXTRKU02 include in the EXIT_SAPLV56K_002 exit).
    Am I using the proper exit? I appreciate any suggestions.
    Thanks,
    Grzegorz Skorus

    Hello Grzegorz
    Not an expert on this, but noone is responding so I thought let me try and help you. You seem to be doing the right things as mentioned in OSS note 1498409.
    Firstly since this can be called form Shipment Idoc also, you may need to make a differentiation by the interface parameter 'MESSAGE_TYPE' or segment name. See the attached OSS note, though it belongs to older releases,  it may help you.
    Also help says 'The callup of this function module is programmed for each enhancement of the internal table for the IDoc (in other words, when you add an extra segment'. So may be you need to add an extra segment/field to make it work.
    Futher  the user exits are replaced by BADIs. May be you should use exit_badi_v56k.
    Hope this helps and others will pitch in.
    1498409 - Valuation Type unavailable when creating deliveries using IDOC
    631913 - Exit after formatting delivery IDoc type DELVRY

Maybe you are looking for