Problem with weblogicURL.policy

Are you sure you are using weblogic.security.acl.GroupImpl for the "Principal class"?
For whatever reason we had weblogic.security.acl.Group in the weblogicURL.policy file and had the same problem you described.

Hi,
Please check whether this helps you or not.
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E11857_01/em.111/e16790/security3.htm#BABEBCIE
~J

Similar Messages

Problem with Assigning Policy button in Outlook 2010 and Exchange 2010

First of all, I'm posting here because I'm not sure how to post in the previous version of Exchange forums.
Secondly, I'm re-posting this from the Outlook forums as I'm not getting any responses there despite of views.
Hi,
I'm having an issue in Outlook 2010 where I can't assign personal policies to folders. I have setup personal tags and added the mailbox to the right policy. I have also ran Start-MangedFolderAssistant in Exchange 2010 Shell against the mailboxes.
When I go into OWA, everything shows up perfectly, I can right-click and assign policies at will, but when I open Outlook 2010 then the Assign Policy button never appears. I force added it to the ribbon and I can see from there that the button stays grayed
out irregardless of where I click in the folder structure. I have even assigned the mailbox user Owner rights to all the folders to see if it will make a difference.
If anyone can help me solve this problem I will very grateful, I'm pulling my hair out here and I'm certain I could just be missing something very obvious somewhere,
It might be worth mentioning that the company has been using .prf files to configure Outlook thus far, I'm
looking to eliminate that. I'm not sure if that will have any effect on my current problem.
Thanks for your time.
Nico

Thanks for the reply Max, that's a pretty good link.
Like is I said though, I have the policies all set up in the Exchange configuration side of things, when I use OWA all the options for applying tags appear. It's just in Outlook 2010 Standard that the Assign Policy button stays grayed out.
Thanks.
EDIT:
This has been solved, looks like version problem with Outlook.
http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/outlook-help/license-requirements-for-personal-archive-and-retention-policies-HA102576659.aspx

[Solved][Hal and Partitions] Newbie problem with hal policy

Hello everybody,
As a new user of archlinux for less than a week I have experienced a great distribution after having been for 1 year on Linux.
After installation I was able to solve most of my problems with the wiki and the forums but there is one problem I cannot resolve.
I have installed Kde 4.2 on my computer and I can mount Usb drives, or CDs with hal (It is in the daemons section of my rc.conf) but strangely I cannot access my other partitions such as my Ubuntu partition (ext3), or the family's Windows partition (Nfts). I have installed nfts-3g for the nfts partition hal refuses to let me access it, I will give you what Dolphin says when I try to access the Nfts:
org.freedesktop.Hal.Device.PermissionDeniedByPolicy: hal-storage-mount-fixed-extra-options no <-- (actions,result)
And for the ext3
org.freedesktop.Hal.Device.PermissionDeniedByPolicy: hal-storage-mount-fixedauth_admin_keep_always <-- (actions,result)
I don't really understand what It means but normally I am allowed to mount partitions.
My /etc/PolycyKit/PolicyKit.conf: http://pastebin.com/m57e94025
And my /etc/dbus-1/system.d/hal.conf: http://pastebin.com/m62861179
I've already tried to configure these two with the wiki and the forums but nothing yet.
If you need more information ask me.
Thanks in advance.
Last edited by auratux (2009-02-23 21:24:29)

You might want to reread the Hal wiki re: Permission Denied with automounter. Your /etc/PolicyKit/PolicyKit.conf seems to be missing the lines mentioned in the wiki.
Edit: Or maybe it is similair to: http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=66008
Last edited by bgc1954 (2009-02-22 14:07:10)

Excel 2003 problem with group policy

When I manually install EMET Excel 2003 works. When Emet is installed via Group Policy Excel 2003 fails to open. Excel 2010 works whether EMET is installed locally or with Group Policy. Any ideas?

I would try exporting the policy on both installs using emet_conf --export and comparing the 2 policies
GBS Premier Field Engineer Cybersecurity Check out my blog http://blogs.technet.com/kfalde or better yet check out http://technet.com/wiki and start contributing :)

Problem with Acess policy based Provisioning using DBConnecor in OIM 11g R2

Hi,
I am doing Access policy based Provisioning using DB Connector 9.1.0.5.0 in OIM 11g r2.
it is throwing ITResource Instance with key 0 does not exist. but there no option to select it resource in Process form via Acesspolicy.
in Application instance form there is a form in that it-resource field is available with default value 0. i am trying to update this value it is not updating . at the time of triggering access policy i am getting following error.
[XELLERATE.SERVER] [tid: [ACTIVE].ExecuteThread: '8' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'] [userId: oiminternal] [ecid: 0000JdMSEGQApIGqywYfMG1GU6ud000002,0] [APP: oim#11.1.2.0.0] Class/Method: APIUtils/createApplicationInstance encounter some problems: ITResource Instance with key 0 does not exist.[[
oracle.iam.provisioning.exception.ITResourceNotFoundException: ITResource Instance with key 0 does not exist.
     at oracle.iam.provisioning.util.ApplicationInstanceUtil.validateITResource(ApplicationInstanceUtil.java:119)
     at oracle.iam.provisioning.impl.ApplicationInstanceServiceImpl.addApplicationInstance(ApplicationInstanceServiceImpl.java:70)
     at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
     at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
     at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
     at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
     at org.springframework.aop.support.AopUtils.invokeJoinpointUsingReflection(AopUtils.java:307)
     at org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.invokeJoinpoint(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:182)
     at org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:149)
     at oracle.iam.platform.utils.DMSMethodInterceptor.invoke(DMSMethodInterceptor.java:25)
     at org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:171)
     at org.springframework.aop.framework.JdkDynamicAopProxy.invoke(JdkDynamicAopProxy.java:204)
     at $Proxy455.addApplicationInstance(Unknown Source)
     at oracle.iam.provisioning.api.ApplicationInstanceServiceEJB.addApplicationInstancex(Unknown Source)
     at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
     at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
     at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
     at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
     at com.bea.core.repackaged.springframework.aop.support.AopUtils.invokeJoinpointUsingReflection(AopUtils.java:310)
     at com.bea.core.repackaged.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.invokeJoinpoint(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:182)
     at com.bea.core.repackaged.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:149)
     at com.bea.core.repackaged.springframework.aop.support.DelegatingIntroductionInterceptor.doProceed(DelegatingIntroductionInterceptor.java:131)
     at com.bea.core.repackaged.springframework.aop.support.DelegatingIntroductionInterceptor.invoke(DelegatingIntroductionInterceptor.java:119)
     at com.bea.core.repackaged.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:171)
     at com.oracle.pitchfork.spi.MethodInvocationVisitorImpl.visit(MethodInvocationVisitorImpl.java:34)
     at weblogic.ejb.container.injection.EnvironmentInterceptorCallbackImpl.callback(EnvironmentInterceptorCallbackImpl.java:54)
     at com.oracle.pitchfork.spi.EnvironmentInterceptor.invoke(EnvironmentInterceptor.java:42)
     at com.bea.core.repackaged.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:171)
     at com.bea.core.repackaged.springframework.aop.interceptor.ExposeInvocationInterceptor.invoke(ExposeInvocationInterceptor.java:89)
     at com.bea.core.repackaged.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:171)
     at com.bea.core.repackaged.springframework.aop.support.DelegatingIntroductionInterceptor.doProceed(DelegatingIntroductionInterceptor.java:131)
     at com.bea.core.repackaged.springframework.aop.support.DelegatingIntroductionInterceptor.invoke(DelegatingIntroductionInterceptor.java:119)
     at com.bea.core.repackaged.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:171)
     at com.bea.core.repackaged.springframework.aop.framework.JdkDynamicAopProxy.invoke(JdkDynamicAopProxy.java:204)
its urgent requirement.
Thanks,
Edited by: 853559 on Oct 12, 2012 2:25 PM

You can re-visit access policy It will have the Process form where you can provide the access policy and save it. Access policy is already created so you can modify access policy and open the process form select IT Resource and save it.
Another way to write pre-pop adapter for populating IT Resource on the process form. But I am sure you can provide it resource via access policy.
---nayan

Problem with Access Policy

Hi All!
OIM 11g:
1. I have installed DBUM 9.1.0.4
2. I have configured IT Resurce, and RO for granting user MS SQL User and database role (for example in HRData db)
3. I have created Role named: "HRData DB User" and Access Policy named: "HR Data DB User" wchich grants correct RO.
4. When role is granted by xelsysadm for specific oim user everything is OK.
Problem:
when user request for role: "HRData DB User" from Self-Service portal, and request is approved by xelsysadm, role is granted but RO is not granted. I have following error:
+<Nov 19, 2010 1:12:46 PM CET> <Error> <XELLERATE.SERVER> <BEA-000000> <Class/Method+
+: tcDataObj/eventPreInsert Error :Insert permission is denied>+
+<Nov 19, 2010 1:12:46 PM CET> <Error> <oracle.iam.accesspolicy.impl.handlers.provis+
ioning> <IAM-4030308> <An error occurred in oracle.iam.accesspolicy.impl.handlers.p
rovisioning.ProvisionAccountActionHandler while provisioning resource 161 to user 4
+3 and the cause of error is DOBJ.INSERT_PERMISSION_DENIED: H: You do not have permi+
ssion to insert this object..>
+<Nov 19, 2010 1:12:46 PM CET> <Warning> <oracle.iam.callbacks.common> <IAM-2030081>+
+<[CALLBACKMSG] Inside completion plugin for request 68.>+
+<Nov 19, 2010 1:12:46 PM CET> <Warning> <oracle.iam.callbacks.common> <IAM-2030082>+
+<[CALLBACKMSG] Inside completion plugin for request 68, target tye is Role and ope+
ration is SELFASSIGNROLES.>
+<Nov 19, 2010 1:12:46 PM CET> <Warning> <oracle.iam.callbacks.common> <IAM-2030082>+
+<[CALLBACKMSG] Inside completion plugin for request 68, target tye is RoleUser and+
operation is CREATE.>
Any suggestions?
best
mp

Hi Rajiv,
So, there is no way we can implement this?
My requirement is same as this,
OIM: Question about "Auto Save" option on Resource Object
I have a Resource Object that needs to be provisioned at least two ways:
1) thru an access policy by group membership
2) thru user self-request, who is not already in that group membership
The problem is if I don't check the "Auto Save" check box the automatic assignment thru access policy is not completing and If I do check the check box then user request is not letting the user to enter values into the resource form. Instead it is directly going to submit request. Looks like these are mutually exclusive.
Is there a way to make both work on the same Resource Object?
Thanks
SK

Problem with Access policy Provisioning on AD

Hi,
I have created an access policy, which will trigger the provisioning the user to AD when the user is added to group 'abc'.
Its without approval.
We have object form and process form. Process form is autosave.
But, the problem is, as soon as the user is added to the group 'abc'.
It triggers the provisioning flow. But the provisioning will be in ready state only.
When we go and save the resource form only the provisioning flow triggers.
If we make the object as auto save, it will work. But in our case we cannot make the object autosave as it has a resource form to be filled by user in other flow.
Is there any approach to solve the issue?
Regards,
SK

Hi Rajiv,
So, there is no way we can implement this?
My requirement is same as this,
OIM: Question about "Auto Save" option on Resource Object
I have a Resource Object that needs to be provisioned at least two ways:
1) thru an access policy by group membership
2) thru user self-request, who is not already in that group membership
The problem is if I don't check the "Auto Save" check box the automatic assignment thru access policy is not completing and If I do check the check box then user request is not letting the user to enter values into the resource form. Instead it is directly going to submit request. Looks like these are mutually exclusive.
Is there a way to make both work on the same Resource Object?
Thanks
SK

Problem with VPD policy function

Hi All,
I'm trying to secure database tables with VPD and getting "ORA-28112: failed to execute policy function" error when I query the table.
--My schema is "sales"
grant crete any context to sales;
-- created context using this statement
create OR REPLACE context sales_APP_CTX using PKG_SECURITY ACCESSED GLOBALLY;
-- Package spec
CREATE OR REPLACE PACKAGE PKG_SECURITY is
function vpd_sec_pol_func return varchar2 ;
procedure set_sales_app_context(p_user varchar2,p_security_level varchar2);
end;
-- package body
CREATE OR REPLACE PACKAGE BODY PKG_SECURITY is
function vpd_sec_pol_func return varchar2 is
-- v_user varchar2(100) := UPPER(portal.wwctx_api.get_user);
begin
if user not in ('SALES','ORACLE') then
return ' state in (select state from app_user_states where user_id = sys_context(''SALES_APP_CTX'', ''APP_USER''))';
else
return null;
end if;
end;
procedure set_sales_app_context(p_user varchar2,p_security_level varchar2) is
begin
dbms_session.set_context('SALES_APP_CTX','APP_USER',p_user);
-- dbms_session.set_context('SALES_APP_CTX','SECURITY_LEVEL',p_security_level);
end;
end;
-- Added the policy to the table
begin
dbms_rls.add_policy
( object_schema => 'SALES',
object_name => 'SALES_SUMMARY',
policy_name => 'SALES_SUMMARY_POLICY',
function_schema => 'SALES',
policy_function => 'PKG_SECURITY.VPD_SEC_POL_FUNC',
statement_types => 'SELECT,INSERT,UPDATE,DELETE' ,
update_check => TRUE );
end;
-- I was able to set context using sqlplus by executing the procedure
exec PKG_SECURITY.set_sales_app_context('TEST_USER','R');
What am I doing wrong?
Thanks

Hi,
ml_huang wrote:
Is it necessary to create 'Context' and 'Procedure' before the function and policy?It is not necessary to create a context.
A context can be very useful for doing row-level security, but it is not required.
Even if you are using SYS_CONTEXT, you can create the function first, if you want to.
Sorry, I don't understand what 'Procedure' you mean.
I have created a function (with no parameters) and a policy and kept getting the Ora-28112 error.Policy functions must accept 2 VARCHAR2 parameters. See the messages above.
Any suggestions for me? Thanks!Start your own thread for your own question.
I think more people will want to read (and therefore respond to) a new message with 0 replies than a 3-month old message with 4 replies.

Problems with Authorization Policy, the USER has expired and the ISE is allowing access.

Hi,
My end customer reported an issue with ISE 1.1.4-218.
The GUEST user is expired but still can authenticate in the WLAN.
That's an known issue/bug?
Thanks!
Regards,
Rafael Eloi

Check if the option in the configuration part of the Authentication process = CONTINUE.
For example, when you use CWA, the IF AUTHENTICATION FAILED Option = CONTINUE so the MAB Auth always fails but based on that Option your connection continues so you are actually redirected using the AUTHORIZATION Policy.

SCCM 2007 Problem with sign policy assignments

Hello everyone!
I am having a error on status of my central site under SMS_Policy_Provider, the error say:
SMS Policy Provider has failed to sign one or more policy assignments. It will retry this operation automatically.
This error repeat around every 6 seconds, i already tried to renew my certificate but still dont work...
Anyone know what log file can give me more informations about it or how solve it?
Ajudei? Marca como útil, aproveita e visita meu blog :)
HowToServer.com
Gosta de powershell? entra no grupo do facebook
Powershell Brasil
Quer aprender powershell? leia esse artigo
Aprendendo Powershell
Artigos na TechNet Wiki

Thank for you reply Newton,
i already read this topic, but it dont help me...
i will look at policypv.log...
but the way i dont find policyagent.log and policyprovider.log....
Sorry for my poor english
Here, i find these logs at policypv.log, at same time the error appears on status message viewer
Looking for CIN files
Found {4C542A07-7D9C-463B-AC91-83DE85F7E7D9}.STN
Added Scan Tool ID {4C542A07-7D9C-463B-AC91-83DE85F7E7D9}
Adding to delete list: C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Configuration Manager\inboxes\policypv.box\{4C542A07-7D9C-463B-AC91-83DE85F7E7D9}.STN
MEP-ProcessChangedObjects.
MEP-ProcessObjectsInRetry.
No changes found for TSReferencePolicy
Querying the scan tool table...
scan tool crc: 86D57524, 543BBE78
Looking for metering policy and policy assignments that should be created, updated or removed...
CPolicySource::HandleMeteringPolicy: could not retrieve metering rule RULECHG from SQL
Looking for metering policy and policy assignments that should be removed...
Did not find any metering policy or policy assignments that should be removed.
Looking for settings policy and policy assignments that should be created or updated...
CPolicySource::HandleSiteControlPolicy: CollectedFileSiteConfig
no change
CPolicySource::HandleSiteControlPolicy: IDMIFSiteConfig
no change
CPolicySource::HandleSiteControlPolicy: SoftwareInventorySiteConfig
no change
CPolicySource::HandleSiteControlPolicy: RemoteControlConfig
no change
CPolicySource::HandleSiteControlPolicy: SiteWideMachineConfig
no change
CPolicySource::HandleSiteControlPolicy: SiteWideUserConfig
no change
CPolicySource::HandleSiteControlPolicy: SoftwareMeteringSiteConfig
no change
CPolicySource::HandleSiteControlPolicy: OutOfBandManagementSiteConfig
no change
CPolicySource::HandleSiteControlPolicy: PowerManagementSiteConfig
no change
CPolicySource::HandleSiteControlPolicy: DeviceGenericSiteConfig
no change
CPolicySource::HandleSiteControlPolicy: DeviceHardwareInventorySiteConfig
no change
CPolicySource::HandleSiteControlPolicy: DeviceSoftwareInventorySiteConfig
no change
CPolicySource::HandleSiteControlPolicy: DeviceCollectedFileSiteConfig
no change
CPolicySource::HandleSiteControlPolicy: SourcePathClientConfig
no change
CPolicySource::HandleSiteControlPolicy: SoftwareUpdatesClientConfig
no change
CPolicySource::HandleSiteControlPolicy: ClientAgentConfig
no change
CPolicySource::HandleSiteControlPolicy: SoftwareDistClientConfigOld
no change
CPolicySource::HandleSiteControlPolicy: SoftwareDistClientConfig
no change
CPolicySource::HandleSiteControlPolicy: NetworkAccessAccount
no change
CPolicySource::HandleSiteControlPolicy:
no change
CPolicySource::HandleSiteControlPolicy: DCMClientConfig
no change
CPolicySource::HandleSiteControlPolicy: StateSystemClientConfig
no change
CPolicySource::HandleSiteControlPolicy: RootCACertificatesConfig
no change
CPolicySource::HandleSiteControlPolicy: MulticastConfig
no change
Did not find any settings policy and policy assignments that should be created.
Did not find any settings policy and policy assignments that should be updated.
not yet time to do quarantine purge
Found the certificate that matches the SHA1 hash.
STATMSG: ID=5115 SEV=E LEV=M SOURCE="SMS Server" COMP="SMS_POLICY_PROVIDER" SYS=MYSITESERVER SITE=MYSITECODE PID=3564 TID=3400 GMTDATE=qua out 10 13:15:14.051 2012 ISTR0="" ISTR1="" ISTR2="" ISTR3="" ISTR4="" ISTR5="" ISTR6="" ISTR7="" ISTR8="" ISTR9="" NUMATTRS=0
Ajudei? Marca como útil, aproveita e visita meu blog :)
HowToServer.com
Gosta de powershell? entra no grupo do facebook
Powershell Brasil
Quer aprender powershell? leia esse artigo
Aprendendo Powershell
Artigos na TechNet Wiki

Problem with route-policy and taging

Hey!
I'm trying to apply the following configuration but are receving the follow error:
!!% Policy [aggregate-routes] uses the 'tag' attribute. There is no 'tag' attribute at the bgp aggregation-dflt attach point.
route-policy aggregate-routes
set community test
set community test1
if tag eq 1000 then
set community (65000:1,65000:2,65000:3)
endif
end-policy
router static
address-family ipv4 unicast
10.1.1.0/24 Null0 tag 1000
router bgp 65000
address-family ipv4 unicast
aggregate-address 10.1.1.0/24 route-policy aggregate-routes

Hello.
Please find set/match attributes per attach point in the following document - http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/routers/asr9000/software/asr9k_r4-2/routing/configuration/guide/b_routing_cg42asr9k/b_routing_cg42asr9k_chapter_0110.html#con_1240966
Match tag is not supported for the attach point.

Problem with Policy "Display information about previous logons during user logon"

Hello,
I've a problem with the Policy "Setting Display information about previous logons during user logon".
It is applied correctly on computer, but I can't login anymore and message "Security policies on this computer are set to display information about the last interactive logon. Windows could not retrieve this information. Please contact your network administrator
for assistance" is appearing.
My home test domain has 2008 R2 functionality level since months, and I've raised my company infra level functionality to 2012 this morning. Both domain are making the same error.
This is non-sense, so any idea how to troubleshoot it ? Thanks in advance ! ;-)
PS : I was able to remove it in order to login again, no worries on this one...

Did you follow the guidance in http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd446680%28v=ws.10%29.aspx?
Especially the following paragraph - the setting has to be applied to DCs and Members...:
You configure last interactive logon through a GPO. You must configure the following setting for the GPO with domain controllers in its scope of management if you want to report last interactive logon information to the directory service:
Computer Configuration| Policies | Administrative Templates | Windows Components | Windows Logon Options | Display information about previous logons during user logon = Enabled
If you want to display last interactive logon information to the user, you must configure this setting for both the GPO with domain controllers in its scope of management as well as any GPO with Windows Server 2008 and Windows Vista client
computers in its scope of management.
Martin
NO THEY ARE NOT EVIL, if you know what you are doing:
And if IT bothers me - :))
Restore the forum design -
Martin-
I'm struggling with the TechNet article you direct us to. We see in the TechNet article that Last Login Notification works ONLY with Server 2008 R2 and Vista. Do we interpret that correctly?
We need it to work with Server 2003, Server 2008, Win7, Win8, Win8.1, Server 2012, et. al.
What is the work around to enable *Last Login Notifications to Users* functionality for these OSs?
Thanks in advance,
Robin

Having problem with svchost.exe/ntdll.dll errors causing GPSVC (Group Policy Client) to crash preventing users from logging into the server.

Recently (within the past 2 weeks) I have noticed a few of our servers will have problems with the svchost.exe application causing the GPSVC (Group Policy Client) to crash. The only fix at that point is to reboot the server since the GPSVC service is tied
to svchost.exe and therefore is protected from being manually restarted.
I noticed the following errors when this occurs:
Log Name: Application
Source: Application Error
Date: 7/23/2013 4:35:26 AM
Event ID: 1000
Task Category: (100)
Level: Error
Keywords: Classic
User: N/A
Computer: Server1.xxx.xxx.net
Description:
Faulting application name: svchost.exe, version: 6.1.7600.16385, time stamp: 0x4a5bc3c1
Faulting module name: ntdll.dll, version: 6.1.7601.17725, time stamp: 0x4ec4aa8e
Exception code: 0xc0000024
Fault offset: 0x00000000000cd7d8
Faulting process id: 0x46c
Faulting application start time: 0x01ce877f9476ac07
Faulting application path: C:\Windows\system32\svchost.exe
Faulting module path: C:\Windows\SYSTEM32\ntdll.dll
Report Id: d252d26d-f372-11e2-8ad4-005056ac00e8
Event Xml:
<Event xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/win/2004/08/events/event">
<System>
<Provider Name="Application Error" />
<EventID Qualifiers="0">1000</EventID>
<Level>2</Level>
<Task>100</Task>
<Keywords>0x80000000000000</Keywords>
<TimeCreated SystemTime="2013-07-23T08:35:26.000000000Z" />
<EventRecordID>158950</EventRecordID>
<Channel>Application</Channel>
<Computer>AAW19XM2.agency.nwie.net</Computer>
<Security />
</System>
<EventData>
<Data>svchost.exe</Data>
<Data>6.1.7600.16385</Data>
<Data>4a5bc3c1</Data>
<Data>ntdll.dll</Data>
<Data>6.1.7601.17725</Data>
<Data>4ec4aa8e</Data>
<Data>c0000024</Data>
<Data>00000000000cd7d8</Data>
<Data>46c</Data>
<Data>01ce877f9476ac07</Data>
<Data>C:\Windows\system32\svchost.exe</Data>
<Data>C:\Windows\SYSTEM32\ntdll.dll</Data>
<Data>d252d26d-f372-11e2-8ad4-005056ac00e8</Data>
</EventData>
</Event>
All of our servers are running Server 2008 R2 Enterprise where we use Citrix to deliver desktop sessions to our users, but some are virtual and some are physical. This seemingly impacts our virtual machines more, and our VMs are hosted through VMWare, however,
about 5 months ago a similar error fired on a non-virtual machine:
Log Name: Application
Source: Application Error
Date: 2/27/2013 6:57:58 AM
Event ID: 1000
Task Category: (100)
Level: Error
Keywords: Classic
User: N/A
Computer: AAW29033
Description:
Faulting application name: svchost.exe_gpsvc, version: 6.1.7600.16385, time stamp: 0x4a5bc3c1
Faulting module name: ntdll.dll, version: 6.1.7601.17725, time stamp: 0x4ec4aa8e
Exception code: 0xc0000024
Fault offset: 0x00000000000cd7d8
Faulting process id: 0x6c0
Faulting application start time: 0x01ce14e1af313fd9
Faulting application path: C:\Windows\system32\svchost.exe
Faulting module path: C:\Windows\SYSTEM32\ntdll.dll
Report Id: ed3d01c4-80d4-11e2-9128-b499baa9e5e8
Event Xml:
<Event xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/win/2004/08/events/event">
<System>
<Provider Name="Application Error" />
<EventID Qualifiers="0">1000</EventID>
<Level>2</Level>
<Task>100</Task>
<Keywords>0x80000000000000</Keywords>
<TimeCreated SystemTime="2013-02-27T11:57:58.000000000Z" />
<EventRecordID>286291</EventRecordID>
<Channel>Application</Channel>
<Computer>AAW29033</Computer>
<Security />
</System>
<EventData>
<Data>svchost.exe_gpsvc</Data>
<Data>6.1.7600.16385</Data>
<Data>4a5bc3c1</Data>
<Data>ntdll.dll</Data>
<Data>6.1.7601.17725</Data>
<Data>4ec4aa8e</Data>
<Data>c0000024</Data>
<Data>00000000000cd7d8</Data>
<Data>6c0</Data>
<Data>01ce14e1af313fd9</Data>
<Data>C:\Windows\system32\svchost.exe</Data>
<Data>C:\Windows\SYSTEM32\ntdll.dll</Data>
<Data>ed3d01c4-80d4-11e2-9128-b499baa9e5e8</Data>
</EventData>
</Event>
I've searched and cannot seem to find any information as to what may be causing this, or even really where to start. Would someone be able to help me identify what might be causing this event, specific with the Exception code: 0xc0000024, which causes
the Group Policy Client service to stop?

You still out there looking at things? If so I have an update. The issue hasn't stopped, even though it did seemingly die down for awhile, however, it is now back with a vengeance.
I am able to force it to happen by killing the svchost process that is hosting GPSVC. If I run gpupdate /force, then logout/login it does get GPSVC running again. Furthermore, if I simply start svchost again via the Task Manager GPSVC starts running again.
When I access the server remotely with KVM it acts just like it does as if I'm logging into it via Citrix/RDP which for Admin IDs gives an error saying "Failed to connect to a windows service. Windows could not connect to the Group Policy Client service...",
however, normal user accounts just get a message when logging into the server "The Group Policy Client Service Failed the Logon. Access is denied."
I haven't opened a case with Microsoft yet, but we about ready to because of the increase in these errors.
If you have any further suggestions that would be great, otherwise I'll provide an update once I get word back from Microsoft.
**EDIT -- apparently I mistook the the server's SCM's actions as my own. I was able to successfully crash the GPSVC service by killing the hosting svchost process, however, after I crashed it and let it sit crashed for awhile when I attempted
to restart either by starting a svchost task, or running gpupdate /force it failed. Either that, or there is a timing issue where if we don't restart the svchost process, or run gpupdate /force quickly enough it won't be able to recover without a reboot.

Problems with $HOME/.java.policy

hi,
i'm using suse linux 7.3 & jdk 1.4.
i have a simple test applet that prints the user name. i signed it by:
cprokt@linux:~/java/applets/uname> jarsigner -signedjar strapp.jar trapp.jar cprokt
Enter Passphrase for keystore: dubel07
cprokt@linux:~/java/applets/uname> jarsigner -verify strapp.jar
jar verified.then i created the java policy file /home/cprokt/.java.policy
keystore "/home/cprokt/.keystore";
grant SignedBy "cprokt"
permission java.util.PropertyPermission "user.name", "read";
};Running this applet with appletviewer resulted in a AccessControlException which said:
java.security.AccessControlException: access denied (java.util.PropertyPermission user.name read)I got the same result when I ran the applet with Konqueror (blackdown vm 1.3).

It's not neccessary to have a .java.policy file if you sign the applet. I run my applets (intranet only) with a policy file alone, without signing them. The only drawback to the policy file security is that it will have to be deployed to your users, this does not work in the internet, who's going to accept your policy file, but it's not so bad in an intranet. If you sign the applet succesfully, by default you'll get "all permissions" and getting the user name should not be a problem.
Hope this helps...

I have purchased my iPhone 4S from USA. Its a Factory unlocked phone. I am facing problem with the hardware. Is there any support that apple provides to send the phone from India to USA to get it replaced? Also if there is any travelers Policy?

I have purchased my iPhone 4S from USA. Its a Factory unlocked phone. I am facing problem with the hardware. Is there any support that apple provides to send the phone from India to USA to get it replaced? Also if there is any travelers Policy?

No and no.

Problem with weblogicURL.policy

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for