Problème AfterEffect avec une Nvidia Quadro K4000

Bonjour à tous!
Nous avons récemment acquéri une Carte Graphique Nvidia Quadro K4000 pour le graphiste de ma société.
Il tourne sur un PC HP Z400 avec 6 Go de Ram et un processeur Xéon série 3600.
Voir fiche sur le site HP : http://h41111.www4.hp.com/new_workstations/fr/fr/z400_tech-specs.html#tab-nav
Depuis l'installation de la carte graphique et de la mise à jour des pilotes (ainsi que ceux de sa machine), il a perdu en performance.
Ma question: y a t'il une configuration/paramétrage à faire pour exploiter la pleine puissance de la quadro k4000 sous CS5.5 ?
Merci d'avance pour vos réponses

Alors la release de pilotes actuellement installé est : Quadro/NVS/Tesla/Grid Desktop driver Release 331 (officielle de Nvidia)
Le site de nvidia ne fait aucunement référence à des pilotes CUDA pour les systèmes Windows (uniquement proposé pour Mac)
Les opérations les plus lentes les plus flagrantes sont les prévisualisation dans after effect et les temps de rendu plus long qu'avec l'ancienne carte.
L'anciennne carte graphique est une ATI FirePro 3D V3800
Perso je sèche
Merci d'essayer de m'aider

Similar Messages

Fine tuning nvidia quadro k4000 to work with premiere pro cc

Would anyone know the correct settings for nvidia quadro k4000 to work with premiere pro cc please?
Currently it's only using 33% of it's full power when rendering, while the CPU is running @ 95%
Mercury playback engine GPU is selected.
Thank you in advance

why would the encoder have the option to choose between mercury playback engine using GPU, or sofware encoding only!
From the article linked to earlier:
The video card and hardware MPE is not the holy grail. It helps in some circumstances to improve performance and rather significantly, but in other instances it does not help at all, as is indicated in the link above. People often think that installing a super fast video card will reduce export times by a significant amount of time. That is not true. It only helps in a limited number of situations. Keep in mind that:
Encoding to an export format is done by the CPU, not the GPU. No performance gain from a video card.
Frame rate changes, frame blending is done by a suitable video card, for instance exporting to 24P from 29.97i or 60P. Here there is a clear performance gain.
Scaling is also helped by hardware MPE, for instance going from 4K to HD or from HD to SD. Again a clear performance gain.
Rendering for preview is helped by the video card only for accelerated effects.

Nvidia Quadro K4000 vs Asus GTX 760. Which one better for AE and Pr ?

I have 2 Computers and planning to mix them up together as possible. I built a PC with quadro k4000 last year because I was graduated as 3D animator and i plan to work as Animator, plus I also have another PC with GTX 760. and now I'm currently working as Video Editor. so here are my questions:
- k4000 and gtx 760 which one would do better in AE and Pr ?
- I read some articles said: "quadro and gtx can group up together in one PC". is it really possible ? because some people said yes and some people said no and some people said yes but wont work together blah blah. I really want to know about it, because right now I already have these 2 GPU. and if YES. can you show me how to do it?
there are my both PC specs:
CPU: core i7 3820 3.66hz
RAM: 16GB
SSD 128gb
HDD 3TB
MotherBoard: Asus P9X79 PRO
VGA: asus GTX 760
Another one is:
CPU core i7-3930K 3.20GHz
RAM: 32GB
SSD: 256gb
HDD: 3TB x 2
MotherBoard: ASRock X79 Extreme6
VGA: quadro k4000
Can somebody help me to build these 2 PC in just 1 PC as possible ?

I have something similar that I just posted about - my system has both a GTX780 and a Quadro K4200 installed. Eric is right. They work, but the driver installation can be tricky.
Mine is a new build and I am trying to learn how the two cards work together. I expected better performance. I don't understand why setting CUDA acceleration to only the GeForce, when NVidia allows for both CUDA GPUs. I tried every combination with no difference in results. So, I will be following your thread to see what happens.

Problème avec une composition dans after effect

Bonjour,
j'ai un problème avec une composition dans after effect (12.2.1.5). Lors d'une transformation à l'échelle d'une image, elle se double et se déforme

ci joint,deux capture d'écran, sur la première le logo déformé sur la composition et la deuxième le logo à l'initiale.
Comment faire pour éviter la déformation?

Mac problème avec une extension Adobe Exchange qui ne se télécharge pas et bloque Adobe Exchange Manager

Sur mon Imac dans Indesign CS6 j'ai essayé de télécharger EAN Barcode Manager, ça n'a pas fonctionné, elle figure avec une roue de téléchargement fixe. Impossible de supprimer cette extension maintenant. Je n'arrive pas à faire monter Adobe Extension Manager CS6 qui bloque sur "Chargement d'extensions...". J'ai désinstallé et réinstallé Exchange Panel, rien ni fait. Merci de votre aide pour remettre tout cela en ordre.

Bonsoir. Adobe exchange est intégré à Photoshop CC. Voyez dans le menu fenêtres-extensions-adobe exchange.

PS CS6 10bit with Quadro K4000 and 30" Dell U3011. My experiences...

Hello everyone. I had searched quite extensively when looking into a solution for my color banding on an ancient Apple 30" cinema display which was on it's last leg. That search led me to 10bit and it's surprisingly obscure implementation in PS. Allow me to share my experiences so others doing google searches can potentially be helped, and also pose a few questions that Nvidia could not answer for me.
First, I am running Windows 7 x64, latest drivers/patches on everything. Everything includes:
PNY Quadro K4000
Dell U3011 via Displayport
Windows 7 x64
Photoshop CS6 x64
2560 x 1600 Desktop resolution
So the long story here is that I did not think my combination was working. I tried the ramp.psd from AMDs website, and saw absolutely no change. Frustrated, I hit the internet, and unfortunately, found a plethora of AMD/ATI based help, but very very little Nvidia Quadro support, msot likely due to their "it just works" mentality (http://nvidia.custhelp.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/3049/~/how-to-enable-30-bit-color-on-wi ndows-platforms). The help files say that the Quadro and PS will just detect the ability to use 10bit color depth and use it, but there is no way to confirm that that combination is in fact compatible without actually seeing the result. No screen overlays, no checkboxes in the driver (as far as confirmation goes). You can force 10bit in the quadro driver, but that doesn't tell you it's actually working.
So I got on the live support with a helpful tech from Nvidia and eventually got to the bottom of it. Things I learned:
- with Photoshop maximized at 2560 x 1600, 10bit did NOT work with any of the flyout panels open. This was the number one hair-puller, and why I thought this was not working at all the entire time. I had my history panel out. At some point while chatting with the Nvidia rep I decided to take photoshop off of full screen so I could see both PS and the chat window at the same time. The PS window then occupied maybe 70% of the screenspace and poof.. the bands disappeared. I slowly drag the corner of the screen out to make it larger and at some point the bands pop back in. Odd. So I maximize but close the flyout history panel and poof, bands disappear. If I'm fullscreen and hit tab to hide shelves and panels, smooth as butter as well. The Nvidia rep summized that it had to do with OpenGL overlays interfering, but had nothing to offer in the way of the resolution/screen size issue.
So I either have to view 10bit as a toggle, or not use my pallets as flyouts in the main PS window, or not maximize PS.
So, I'm sure there are other people running this combo, so I'd love to hear your results. ATI/AMD cards are clearly a different driver set, and thus, probably totally different results. Nvidia claims there is NO resolution limit to 10bit written into their driver, so the resolution being the problem did not make sense to them. That laid the blame purely on Photoshop. I'd love to hear from Adobe on the matter.
In any case, hopefully this helps someone struggling as to why they see no difference on that gradient image. It is literally night and day, so if you aren't seeing that "pop," it's just not working.
I must say that, as I've read in countless other posts, in actual photos, this 10bit can be a very minimal improvement, but it is noticeable in some of my shots where I have color grads on skintones. The red burn is gone, and it's a much smoother transition. This is insanely evident in purely CG created gradients or gausian blurred overlays, however. I have a few CG-assisted background hotspots with the addition of a gausian blurred screen of white, and it has helped that quite a bit.
I, for one, welcome out 10bit overlords. Hope this helps someone.
Cheers
- Justin

"Have you tried disabling desktop composition (Aero Glass)? I have heard there can be conflicts there that prevent drivers from enabling full 30 bit color."
This is disabled automatically by the Quadro driver the second you turn on the Deep Color option. And no, as someone who uses his machine for production moreso than pleasure, I immediately turn all that stuff off anyways as it's useless.
I will test that file after work tonight when I get home. No 10bit here. Irony.
Thanks. I'll also try to make a video/animated gif of sorts to illustrate the difference to your naked eye. I was also quite clueless as to the "real world" implications when I started looking into this, as all you really find are generated gradients, which seem doctored at times. Seeing the pop happen with your own eyes is quite interesting, and a definite selling feature.
Oh, also, I will add that I previously ordered the new U2713H from Dell, and I was 100% disssatisfied with the backlight bleed, as well as the color representation and quality control. Mine had a very terribly noticeable yellow color bleed in the lower left. I found this to be a regular occurance for these newer LED backlit monitors, and ultimately returned it and went with the older CCFL U3011. It is far superior IMO and only slightly more expensive. Highly recommended. This forum posting swayed my ultimate decision away from the U3014: http://hardforum.com/showthread.php?t=1751499
- Justin

Geforce titan or quadro k4000?

Hello all -
I'm hoping to get a little help/clarification on which card would better suit my needs, and appreciate any/all help. I'm probably at an intermediate level of understanding when it comes to the technical aspects of computers, so some of the finer points escape me.
In short, i'm looking at two graphics cards to purchase as an upgrade: the geforce titan http://www.geforce.com/hardware/desktop-gpus/geforce-gtx-titan/specifications or the quadro k4000 http://www.nvidia.com/object/quadro-desktop-gpus.html .
Currently, my setup is as follows:
Intel Motherboard Dual Socket Xeon S5520SC
Intel Xeon CPU Fan Heatsink STS100C
2 x 2.26GHz Intel "Nehalem" Xeon Quad Core [8MB]
12GB 1333MHz DDR3 Triple Channel SDRAM (6 x 2GB)
1TB High Speed Hard Drive [64MB Cache, 7200RPM]
StormDrive Dual Layer CD/DVD Writer
850W Silent Power Supply
Windows 7 Pro [64-bit]
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 Workstation Graphics Accelerator [1GB]
PCI 3 Port FireWire [TI Chipset]
(additional) 1TB High Performance Drive [64MB Cache SATA 3 6GB]
I use my workstation for projects and not gaming. And i used CS5 and Toon Boon Harmony as my two mediums for editing/creation. With CS5, it's my understanding that the quadro cards are preferred as they utilize some useful functions (such as mercury playback), and that they handle after effects better for the 3d issues. Conversely, Toon Boom Harmony suggests a geforce card over a quadro, as it corresponds with their software more "inherently" than a quadro. Granted, both programs would work well with either type of card, but is there one that is better fit to run both? And given my setup listed above, would the Titan card be massive overkill/be bottlenecked by slower components? Additionally, can anyone testify to a head to head matchup between these two cards?
Thanks.

I listed observations and testing results. The editing applications that have GPU acceleration and perform better with Geforce cards are professional applications used in all the media content creation industry. Davinci and Adobe are far more prevalent now than what few applications that benefit from the Quadro Open GL plugins. GPU acceleration in general has supplanted Open GL as the primary GPU processing. Since it has, the raw specs of the cards decide the performance. This has been tested and shown with results by far more people than myself. So these are not opinions. The 700 series cards are showing greater performance than the previous gen Nvidia cards so obviously the cards were not limited that much if at all. The applications caching models are currently limiting the performance of the current cards as are the CPU's available. The CPU's themselves have to decode the data first that get's GPU processed and create all of the buffers that transit the data down to the GPU for processing. That is where the current limitation is for the GPU processing load. GPU-Z is reflecting this when monitoring the GPU load during application processing. Only certain codecs with resolutions greater than 2K such as red are using enough frame data to really push the cards. This points to applications limiting performance and not the hardware. There are far more applications now using GPU acceleration that gain the benefit from the specs of the cards than there are applications that take advantage of the Quadro Open GL plugins
Nothing you have mentioned supports any professional stability argument for the Quadro cards. I actually listed a current problem with the Quadro cards that effects any processing unit and that is heat. That has been observed in testing and long term support here with failed video cards. The Quadro k4000 series due to the single slot profile, limited cooling, and poor fan control has the highest failure rate. Those cards are averaging well over 80+C with GPU acceleration applications especially since they are using lower end GPU chips that are often at 75% load or greater. Time, experience, and results show the higher end Geforce cards have a higher stability probability due to heat generation and constant long term load percentage. The only reason scientific, medical, and engineering GPU acceleration applications are used with the Quadro cards is the ECC ram option. When processing data sets that take weeks to complete or have extremely high cost involved in research, errors due to GPU ram is not something those R&D entities want to risk. In those scenarios the Quadro cards are the best choice. That is the only stability based advantage the Quadro cards bring to the table. That however no real impact on media content creation which we are discussing in this forum.
Results and observations don't require a resume of experience to validate. Simply perform the testing as other have done like myself and list them here. I am stating results and observations that have been reported by many others so the validation is the simply the number of results that reflect the same data. If you disagree then report your results and let others either duplicate or disprove. That is not blind faith but simply data. Listing a bunch of marketing material as facts does nothing to validate your argument and are not facts as you state. They are marketing points that can be interpreted any number of ways hence the lack of any real value to the actual editors or content industry in general.

FirePro W7000 or Quadro K4000

I am about to buy a graphic card
I am between FirePro W7000 and Quadro K4000
I know that Adobe is supporting the OpenCL in it's latest products so the AMD solution is an option.
But I have problem.
I am not entirely sure whether the 3DRay tracing Rendering in After Effects benefits from the openCL or it is only CUDA accelerated
since I've read that OpenCL doesn't fully support certain plugins and functions.
So what do you suggest?
I am not interested in buying a consumer gaming card so pls dont tell me about GeforceGTX or HD products
Thank you in advance for your response
Best regards
Dimitris

> I would like to know if Adobe is planing to support OpenCL for these kind of tasks in the near future
The ray-traced 3D renderer in After Effects is built on top of the Nvidia OptiX library, which relies on CUDA. This will never work with OpenCL. Keep in mind that this is only one feature, though, and there are other ways to work with 3D in After Effects, including the more recent features to integrate After Effects with CInema 4D.
> So... you recomend the Quadro K4000...
I don't see where anyone said that. That card isn't on the list of tested and supported in the current version.
> thats why I need a more professional card.
I think that it's incorrect to refer to the Quadro cards as "more professional". They provide different features. If raw CUDA computation is what you're after, the GTX cards do very well. Part of building a "professional" system is only spending what you need to on the features that you'll actually use (and then using the savings on other components, like RAM and SSDs, whoch make a huge difference in performance).
We spend a lot of time talking with our partners at Nvidia about this, and they are happy to recommend cards like the GTX 690 for use with applications like After Effects.
Of the four cards that they asked us to test next, three of them are GTX cards, since these are the ones that they know (and we know) suit the use of After Effects and other creative software well. (The other is the K6000, which is a mighty nice card.)
I'm not trying to tell you that you must get one card or the other. I'm just trying to make sure that you don't dismiss an entire category out of hand without doing more research of your own.

Problème pour diviser une fréquence : "Timebase is invalid" (PCI-6602) ???

Bonjour,
je dispose d'une pci-6602, de CVI 6 et de DAQ Traditionnel.
Je voudrais diviser une fréquence par 16 à l'aide du compteur 2 (en mode 'toggle', ce qui revient donc à la diviser par 32).
J'utilise pour cela la fonction 'FrequencyDividerConfig'. je passe en argument de cette fonction 'Use Counter Source', puisque la fréquence que je souhaite diviser est externe (elle provient du compteur 3, et est de 4000 Hz environ). De plus, je relie la sortie du compteur 3 à la source du compteur 2.
Pourtant, lors de la compilation, j'ai à chaque fois le message "Timebase is invalid". Que dois-je faire pour que ça marche ???
Je précise que dans le function panel de 'FrequencyDividerConfig', il est écrit en bleu que cette fonction ne peut être utilisée qu'avec les compteurs DAQ-STC et Am9513. Comme les compteurs de ma carte sont des NI-TIO, on pourrait penser que c'est pour cela que j'ai un problème. Mais je pense que ce n'est pas le cas, vu que lorsque je souhaite diviser une timebase interne au compteur (de 20 MHz), cela marche sans problème : on peut donc utiliser cette fonction avec les compteurs NI-TIO !! (Je sais c'est bizarre !!!)
Merci pour toute aide,
Julien.

Bonjour,
Vous trouverez un exemple de mise en oeuvre d'une division de fréquence en NI-DAQ Traditionnel sous LabWindows/CVI avec une carte NI 660x sur le lien suivant: http://sine.ni.com/apps/we/niepd_web_display.display_epd4?p_guid=B45EACE3DDCB56A4E034080020E74861&p_node=DZ52328&p_source=External.
La valeur que vous fixerez pour les variables ND_COUNT_X permettront de fixer le diviseur pour la fréquence.
Les masses des compteurs sont communes, il n'est donc pas nécessaire de les relier pour tester cet exemple.
Cordialement,

Comment générer 1 appel de fonction avec une 6014 à la fréquence d'1 SCAN

Je souhaiterais générer un appel de fonction avec une 6014 E, lors d'un SCAN d'entrées analogiques, à chaque acquisition d'une entrée parmi la série des entrées scannées.
Pour ça, j'utilise le jeu d'instructions suivant :
iStatus = Config_DAQ_Event_Message (iDevice, 1, "AI0", 1, 100, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, (unsigned long)&myCallBack);
iStatus = Set_DAQ_Device_Info (iDevice, ND_DATA_XFER_MODE_AI, ND_INTERRUPT_EVERY_SAMPLE);
Ensuite je lance l'acquisition avec SCAN_START.
Je bascule mon entrée A0 de 0 à 5V, mais rien ne se produit, et je ne rentre jamais dans ma callback.
J'en déduis 3 hypothèses :
- Soit il y a un problème dans les nombreux paramètres des instructions pour définir la
gestion d'événements
- Soit ma callback n'est pas définie correctement
- Soit la carte n'est pas prévue pour faire cela...
Dans tous les cas, si vous avez un élément de réponse, sur l'explicitation des paramètres ou l'utilisation d'une callback en C++ ou en C version Windows (j'ai trouvé des ex mais en DOS), je vous serais très reconnaissant, étant à présent à bout de ressources et de nerfs...
Merci d'avance

Bonjour,
A partir du lien suivant vous trouverez des exemples d'acquisition pour Visual Basic :
http://search.ni.com/query.html?col=alldocs&qp=%2Bcontenttype%3AExample+%2BSW%3AMSForVB&lk=1&qt=acquisition&layout=Example
De plus, lorsque vous installez le driver NI-DAQ, des exemples sont à votre disposition.
Sincères salutations
Isabelle Jean
Isabelle
Ingénieur d'applications
National Instruments France

Rendre transparent une ligne avec une combinaison d'objets (pathfinder?)

Bonjour,
Je souhaitera rendre transparent une ligne avec une combinaison d'objets.
Voici un exemple, avec une image c'est toujours plus facile à comprendre:
Je souhaiterai que le trait noir soit transparent afin de voir le rectangle rouge, donc rendre transparent le rectangle bleu à la place du trait noir
J'ai essayé toutes les options dans le Pathfinder, en vain ....
Merci de votre aide !
Lim

Je te remercie de ta réponse rapide
Effectivement je m'en doutais.... Le problème c'est que l'image en question est assez complexe ....
Rendre transparent le bateau afin d'avoir la couleur grise qui sera un support en toile .... (toile grise d'un restaurant)
Du coup soit je tente ton idée mais ca va me prendre pas mal de temps ...
Soit je le rempli avec un gris qui se rapproche de l'original, mais ca risque de ne pas faire propre.
Soit je simplifie le bateau.
Je vais y refflechir ... Si vous avez des idées
Lim

Comment configurer un time capsule dernière generation 2TG avec une livebox2 Sagem

J'ai un problème de configuration d'un time capsule de dernière génération 2 TG avec une livebox 2S Orange, après une connection ethernet sur la box via une connection CPL la connection internet ne se fait pas sur le reseau ainsi créer à partir du time Capsule, quequ'un sait il quoi faire ? Merci pour le coup de main

Problème suite a une mises a jour sur mon MacBook Pro Retina

Le problème : Je fais une mise a jour sur mon MacBook et un message apparaît me disant que"les mises a jours sélectionnées n'ont pas put être installées" jusque la rien d'alarmant, un écran gris apparais ou il y a juste mon curseur j'attends un moment et je décide d'éteindre l'ordinateur ensuite je le rallume et la un écran gris avec une pomme apparais et des codes s' affichent en haut se mon écrans.. j'ai beau attendre rien ne se passe.. QUE DOIS-JE FAIRE ????? (J'ai acheté mon mac hier... --')

Bonjour,
Ce site est plutôt en anglais ... (pour avoir des réponses).
Moi j'ai acheté le mien fin juillet à FNAC Cannes. Lion était installé et j'ai fait l'update ML quand il est sorti. J'aurais mieux fait de m'abstenir. Sous Lion je n'avais même pas vérifié si j'avais bien les 7 h annoncés...
Si vraiment le votre vous a été livré avec ML installé usine, c'est que le problème vient des versions successives, 10.8.1 et 10.8.2.
Il faut donc patienter jusqu'à la prochaine livraison ML (10.8.3 ?) et espérer que l'autonomie de départ soit restaurée !
jm

Quadro k4000 vs GTX 760. which one for AE

I have 2 Computers and planning to mix them up together as possible. I built a PC with quadro k4000 last year because I was graduated as 3D animator and i plan to work as Animator, plus I also have another PC with GTX 760. and now I'm currently working as Video Editor. so here are my questions:
- k4000 and gtx 760 which one would do better in AE and Pr ?
- I read some articles said: "quadro and gtx can group up together in one PC". is it really possible ? because some people said yes and some people said no and some people said yes but wont work together blah blah. I really want to know about it, because right now I already have these 2 GPU. and if YES. can you show me how to do it?
there are my both PC specs:
CPU: core i7 3820 3.66hz
RAM: 16GB
SSD 128gb
HDD 3TB
MotherBoard: Asus P9X79 PRO
VGA: asus GTX 760
Another one is:
CPU core i7-3930K 3.20GHz
RAM: 32GB
SSD: 256gb
HDD: 3TB x 2
MotherBoard: ASRock X79 Extreme6
VGA: quadro k4000
Can somebody help me to build these 2 PC in just 1 PC as possible ?

I have something similar that I just posted about - my system has both a GTX780 and a Quadro K4200 installed. Eric is right. They work, but the driver installation can be tricky.
Mine is a new build and I am trying to learn how the two cards work together. I expected better performance. I don't understand why setting CUDA acceleration to only the GeForce, when NVidia allows for both CUDA GPUs. I tried every combination with no difference in results. So, I will be following your thread to see what happens.

I installed a NVIDIA QUADRO K2000 card and downloaded the most current drivers. AE does not accept

Can anyone offer a solution for this? I installed a NVIDIA QUADRO K2000 graphics card. I downloaded the latest drivers for the card. AE reports that this GPU is incompatible. This is one of recommended listed cards for CS6. Any suggestions?

> This is one of recommended listed cards for CS6.
Where did you get that information? That card is not on this list:
http://www.adobe.com/products/aftereffects/tech-specs.html
What is the exact message that you're referring to when you say that After Effects "reports that this GPU is incompatible"? Is it just saying that it won't use this GPU for the CUDA acceleration of the ray-traced 3D renderer? If so, the only thing that you'd be missing is GPU acceleration of one feature.
See this page for details of how the GPU is used in After Effects:
http://blogs.adobe.com/aftereffects/2012/05/gpu-cuda-opengl-features-in-after-effects-cs6. html

Problème AfterEffect avec une Nvidia Quadro K4000

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for