Probleme d'affichage table de dimension

j'ai un sujet de BI entrain de le faire en utilisant l'outil oracle AWM( analytic workspace manager awm121010B_Standalone)
j'ai créé les dimensions et lorsqque j'ai fait les mapping pour celles-ci les tables de dimensions n'affichent pas !! comment je peux faire s'il y a t-il une solution pour ce probléme?

By set dimensions, do you mean that you mapped the dimensions to the source tables and maintained each dimension?
If so,
1) Check the dimension mapping panel for each dimension to make sure that mappings are mapped to the correct source tables. On the mapping panel, select the Show SQL button to display the queries that will be run to retrieve the data.
2) When maintaining the dimensions, check the Maintenance dialog to see if any errors are displayed. You can also query the cube_build_log directly to see if there were any errors during maintenance.
3) Open the view folder under each dimension on the AWM navigator tree to see what dimension views were generated and then click on the Data tab to view any data that was loaded into the dimension.
--ken

Similar Messages

Join multiple fact tables and dimensions and use all tables in report issue

Hi,
I have a report requirements and need to use multiple fact tables and unconformed dimensions as described below
Fact table: F1,F2,F3
Dimensions tables: D1.....D9
F1:(joined to) D1,D2,D3,D4
F2::(joined to)D1,D2,D5,D6
F3::(joined to)D1,D2,D7,D8
D7::(joined to)D9,D8 (dimension D7 joined to two other dimensions D9 and D8
I'm trying to use columns from almost all the fact and dimension tables but getting "Unable to navigate requested expression. Please fix the metadata consistency warnings."
Repository is consistent and no errors and warnings.
How can I configure the repository to develop reports using all fact tables and dimensions?
Appreciate for your help.
Thanks
Jay.
Edited by: Jay on Feb 9, 2012 4:14 PM

So you want me to convert snowflake schema to star. does it solve my problem? individual star queries are working find but when I query multiple stars together getting inconsistency errors. I removed content tables dim level totals for unconformed dimensions in logical fact LTS and set level for measures at total level for unconformed dimensions. it is still in progress and need to test.
Thanks
Jay.

"Missing most detailed table for dimension tables" eror when I run the Global Consistency check

ERRORS:
Business Model DAC Measures:
[nQSError: 15003] Missing most detailed table for dimension tables: [D_DETAILS,D_EXECUTION_PLAN,D_TASK].
[nQSError: 15001] Could not load navigation space for subject area DAC Measures.
I am also attaching my Business Model layer for easy understanding. I have a fact table and several Dimension table. I got this error only after creating the following hierarchies:
Execution Plan -> Tasks -> Details
Start Date Time Hierarchy
End Date Time Hierarchy
Is there a solution for this problem? Thanks in advance!

Yes ! My Task Hierarchy has 3 dimension tables that form a hierarchy :Execution Plan -> Tasks -> Detail
All the 3 levels in the hierarchy are 3 different dimension tables.

Problem with Pivot Table with Graph: Line Bar Combo

Hello people!
I have a problem with pivot table and line bar combo (all in the same view (pivot table))
I have some measures and one dimension in my report.
--------------measure1---measure2---measure3
Dim A.1
Dim A.2
Dim A.3
If I choose my graph line bar combo automatically choose "line" measure 3 (last measure in "Show Controls"). How can I do if I want my measure1 for line and I don't want modify my pivot table?
Thank you very much!

Ok, I'll explain my problem again. In my pivot table I add graph vision and I want in the same view (Pivot table). My graph is "Line Bar Combo" and I don't know how but the last of my measures belongs to right AXIS, if I change order of my measures I can see in my graph the measure that I want in my right axis BUT also it changes the order of my pivot table.
This is my problem. I think that I can do that with different views but I lose my selector view to view graphic and my pivot table at the same time.

OBIEE 10g: Problem on fact table mapping

Hi to everyone,
i have this situation:
1) i have 2 fact tables in phisical model (FHRCTR and HCTOT) this two table is the same in the FK columns.
2) the structure is: FHRCTR[month_fk, transaction_type, measure A], HCTOT[month_fk, measure B]. 'transaction_type' is an attribute of the table not dimension.
3) i have created a logical fact table with this two tables for source.
4) each field of logical table is mapped on the corrispetive field on the both phisical table, except for 'transaction_type' column having as source only FHRCTR table.
5) i've created a report with follow colums: month_fk, transaction_type, measure_A, measure_B
The problem is: if i create the report with the columns in point 5, the measure_B returns null values and the measure_A have a correct value.
Insteed if i create a report without 'transaction_type' column the value of Measure_B and Measure_A are correct.
I remind you that: 'transaction_type' in the logical fact table is mapped only on the FHRCTR table because on HCTOT it doesn't exist.
Can you help me to solve this issue?
Thanks

832596 wrote:
Can you help me to solve this issue?
ThanksI guess when you set some aggregation rule for 'transaction_type' in a repository then all will be ok (for examplу - min). But you'll get results that you don't expect.

Oracle Data Compression on SID tables and Dimension Tables

Hello Community,
We have had great success with Oracle compression on ODS tables that are no longer loaded.
We'd now like to move on to other types of BW tables that are very large.
OSS Note 701235 provides answers to questions concerning the possible use of Oracle compression together with SAP BW.
But the Note does not give suggestions for (or against) Oracle compression on SID tables or Dimension tables.
I believe both table types would exhibit the same behaviour : mostly inserts of new SID IDs and new DIM IDs, but few updates to existing SID or Dimension records. If this is true, then both are good candidates for oracle compression.
Do you also agree that this is the typical behaviour for SID tables and dimension tables ? And that these types of tables are good candidates for Oracle compression in a large BW system ?
Thanks kindly!
Keith Helfrich

Hi all,
Although this is an old thread I stumbled on during my own investigations I can provide some answers to your questions.
Table candidates for compression are found by these criteria
       - Table size big enough?
       - Long lifetime of object planned ?
      - No or only rare structural changes for the table   ?
      - u201EUpdateu201C rate low : is your data mostly kind of u201Cread onlyu201D ?
--               for the wideley used rolling window partition techniques of
                  tables in BW this is not a problem: mostly INSERTu2019s in the
                 current partition not affecting other partitions
BW tables that can benefit from compression (see SAP notes 105047,701235)
       - PSA tables with data that must be saved for a longer time
       - ODS change log (no Updates of old data, only Inserts of new data)
       - u201Ehistoricalu201C cubes wich get no changes in table structure anymore
Limitations
         - normal Insert or Update statements are stored ALWAYS in uncompressed
                format and must be compressed separately ( <= Oracle10g )
         - Slight CPU overhead of compression, butu2026
         --      CPU consumption is more than compensated by doing less I/O as
               for Bulk loads or parallel processing
         --      SAP BW transformations took a significant amount of CPU for
                   overall load-time into cubes caused by the application server not
                   the database
          - Table must have not more than 255 fields
          - Adding columns with an initial value or dropping columns require
               uncompression of the complete table (strongest limitation)
Consider all this above and you can decide that tables that going through UPDATE's are
not good candidates for compression or tables that can change it's structure (like
Fact- or DIM tables) .
Now, my questions to you:
Wich Oracle version do you use?
Wich tool do you use for Oracle compression?
BRspace (can you give an example ?)
ALTER ... MOVE COMPRESS
bye
yk

[nQSError: 15003] Missing most detailed table for dimension tables:

Hi,
I am new to BI. I created fresh respository from the scratch.
When run the consistency check I get the following messages.
[nQSError: 15001] Could not load navigation space for subject area SALES.
[nQSError: 15003] Missing most detailed table for dimension tables: [Products,Customers].
Can anyone help me on this.
Thank you
subra.

Got rid of the problem by deleting and recreating the dimension tables.
Subra.

Problem in Assigning table to access sequence

Dear All,
i am facing problem in assigning table to access sequence for billing output type.
I have created 1 table B902 with the combination of Sales org,plant ,Division,Billing doc type.
but if i am going to assign with access sequence system is taking for Billing type & division & for other its showing red marks & errorr.Access sequence->Aceessess->Field.if i am clicking on field in I/O column for plant its displaying negative.
bcause of this i am not able to make condtion record.
Message is Select a document field for WERKS
Regards
ajit
Edited by: SAP SD AJIT on Mar 1, 2010 3:18 PM

Hi SAP SD AJIT ,
Go to IMG --> Sales and Distribution --> Basic Functions --> Output control --> Output Determination --> Output Determination using condition technique --> Mantain output Determination for billing document --> Mantain condition table, in the pop-up choose the option "Field catalog: Messages for billing documents", there you can add standard field into the catalog, so you can add WERKS and the other one "document structure" I don't know what field it is, but if it is and standard field you can add it. If you have a Z field you need ABAP help to add the Z field to the structure "KOMKBZ5" and then you can add it to the catalog.
Regards,
Mariano.

Problem in creation table for sap 4.6

hello evrybody
i have just a problem in creating table with se11;after saving and activite those table and zhen i select icon of contents it bloocks and shoz this error message :
Error reading table TMCNV; RC = 4
Message no. BMG 135
thank you for your help
Edited by: Rob Burbank on Apr 6, 2010 10:20 AM

Seems like you have a material number field (domain with conversion routine MATN1 or alike) and table TMCNV does not have the entry with key 'MATCONV', check the where used-list of message BMG 135. I assume this entry comes delivered by SAP, so try to restore it.
Also search for OSS notes with "TMCNV" or "BMG 135".
Thomas

Problems with a table in PDF`S footer

Dear sirs,
We are having problems when trying to run a PDF with Adobe LiveCycle Designer tool.
We are working with a PDF which is composed of a header, the main body and a footer. We have created a table (table1) at the footer and
another one at the main body (table2). This last table (table2) may overflow therefore it will genarate two pages for our PDF.
On both pages appear the header and the footer correctly but in the last page it does not write the data from the table included in the footer (table1).
We have no problems with the table included in the main body
In the attachments, I send you the screenshots of both pages in which I have marked in red the part where we have error.
May you help us to solve our problem?
Thanks in advance your help.
Edited by: emgaitan on Mar 16, 2010 2:18 PM

Wardell,
Check the data in RSA3 for the extractor that you use to bring data .
You must be using the data source 0CO_OM_CCA_09. Check the data and reconcile and you will get it.
Let me know if you need anything else.
Thanks
Ravi Thothadri
[email protected]

Fact Table and Dimension Tables

Hi Experts, I'm creating custom InfoCubes for data coming from non-SAP source systems. I have two InfoCubes. Tha data is coming from like 10 tables. I have 10 DataSources created fo this and the data will be consolidated in Standard DSO before it will flow into 2 InfoCubes.
Now client wants to know before how much data will be there in InfoCubes in Fact table nad Dimension tables in both the InfoCubes. I have the total size of all the 10 tables from the sources given to me by the DBA. I wan not sure how I can convert that info for Fact table and Dimension table as I have not yet created these Infocubes.
Please help me with this on how I should address this.

hi,
The exact data will be hard to give however you can reach at a round figure in your case.
You are consolidating the data from the tables that means that there is relation between the tables. Arrive at a rough figure based on the relation and the activity you are performing while consolidating the data of the tables.
For example, let us say we want to combine data for sales order and deliveries in a DSO.
Let Sales order has 1000 records and Delivery has 2000 records. Both the tables have a common link (Sales Order).In DSO you are combining the data that means the data will be at the most granular level consist of Delivery data, so the maximum no of records which the consolidated DSO can have is 2000.
regards,
Arvind.

Reg: Fact table and Dimension table in Data Warehousing -

Hi Experts,
I'm not exactly getting the difference between the criteria which decide how to create a Fact table and Dimension table.
This link http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9362854/database-fact-table-and-dimension-table states :
Fact table contains data that can be aggregate.
Measures are aggregated data expressions (e. Sum of costs, Count of calls, ...)
Dimension contains data that is use to generate groups and filters.
This's fine but how does one decide which columns to consider for Fact table and which columns for Dimension table?
Any help is much appreciated.
Pardon me if this's not the correct place for this question. My first question in the new forum.
Thanks and Regards,
Ranit Biswas

ranitB wrote:
But my main doubt was - what is the criteria to differentiate between columns for Fact tables and Dimension tables? How can one decide upon the design?
Columns of a fact table will often be 'scalar' attributes of the 'fact' data item. A dimension table will often be 'compound' attributes of a 'fact'.
Consider employee information. The EMPLOYEE table can be a fact table. It might have scalar attribute columns such as: DATE_HIRED, STATUS, EMPLOYEE_ID, and so on.
Other related information that can't be specified as a single attribute value would often be stored in a 'dimension' table: ADDRESS, PHONE_NUMBER.
Each address requires several columns to define it: ADDRESS1, ADDRESS2, CITY, STATE, ZIP, COUNTRY. And an employee might have several addresses: WORK_ADDRESS, HOME_ADDRESS. That address info would be stored in a 'dimension' table and only the primary key value of the address record would be stored in the EMPLOYEE 'fact' table.
Same with PHONE_NUMBER. Several columns are required to define a phone number and each employee might have several of them. The dimension tables are used to help 'normalize' the data in the employee 'fact' table.
And that EMPLOYEE table might also be a DIMENSION table for other FACT tables. A DEVELOPER table might have an EMPLOYEE_ID column with a value that points to a 'dimension' row in the EMPLOYEE dimension table.

Missing most detailed table for dimension tables

Hi ,
I am getting this following error
Business Model Core:
[nQSError: 15003] Missing most detailed table for dimension tables: [Dim - Customer,Dim - Account Hierarchy,Dim - Account Region Hierarchy,Fact - Fins - Period Days Count].
[nQSError: 15001] Could not load navigation space for subject area Core.
I got this error when I tried to configure # of Elapsed Days and # of Cumulative Elapsed Days by following way-
1. Using the Administration Tool, open OracleBIAnalyticsApps.rpd.
Configuration Steps for Controlling Your Data Set
Configuring Oracle Financial Analytics 5-51
The OracleBIAnalyticsApps.rpd file is located at:
ORACLE_INSTANCE\bifoundation\OracleBIServerComponent\coreapplication_
obisn\repository
2. In the Business Model and Mapping layer, go the logical table Fact - Fins - Period
Days Count.
3. Under Sources, select the Fact_W_DAY_D_PSFT logical table source.
4. Clear the Disabled option in the General tab and click OK.
5. Open the other two logical table sources, Fact_W_DAY_D_ORA and Fact_W_
DAY_D_PSFT, and select the Disabled option.
6. Add the "Fact - Fins - Period Days Count" and "Dim - Company" logical tables to
the Business Model Diagram. To do so, right-click the objects and select Business
Model Diagram, Selected Tables Only.
7. In the Business Model Diagram, create a new logical join from "Dim - Company"
to "Fact - Fins - Period Days Count." The direction of the foreign key should be
from the "Dim - Company" logical table to the "Fact - Fins - Period Days Count"
table. For example, on a (0,1):N cardinality join, "Dim - Company" will be on the
(0/1) side and "Fact - Fins - Period Days Count" will be on the N side.
8. Under the Fact - Fins - Period Days Count logical table, open the "# of Elapsed
Days" and "# of Cumulative Elapsed Days" metrics, one at a time.
9. Go to the Levels tab. For the Company dimension, the Logical Level is set to All.
Click the X button to remove it. Repeat until the Company dimension does not
have a Logical Level setting.
10. Make sure to check Global Consistency to ensure there are no errors, and then
save the RPD file.
Please help me to resolve.
Thanks,
Soumitro

Could you let me know how you resolved this. I am facing the same.

Problem in joining tables

Hi All,
Here I am facing the problem in Joining table I have S031,s032,makt,marc,I need a field ATWRT field from CAWN table,I did't find any link for this above from tables, any one please help me how to find out.
REPORT ZMMTEST.
tables:s031,s032,makt,marc.
DATA : BEGIN OF itab1 OCCURS 0,
       matnr TYPE s031-matnr,
       lgort      TYPE s031-lgort,
       werks      TYPE s031-werks,
       spmon      TYPE s031-spmon,
       magbb      type S031-magbb,
       wagbb      type S031-wagbb,
       azubb      type S031-azubb,
       aagbb      type S031-aagbb,
       END OF itab1.
DATA : BEGIN OF itab2 OCCURS 0,
       matnr like makt-matnr,
       maktx like makt-maktx,
       END OF itab2.
DATA : BEGIN OF itab3 OCCURS 0,
       matnr TYPE marc-matnr,
       werks type marc-werks,
       ekgrp type marc-ekgrp,
       END OF itab3.
DATA : BEGIN OF itab4 OCCURS 0 ,
       matnr   TYPE s032-matnr,
       lgort   TYPE s032-lgort,
       werks   TYPE s032-werks,
       mbwbest type s032-mbwbest,
       wbwbest type s032-wbwbest,
       END OF itab4.
data : begin of itab5 occurs 0,
      objek   type ausp-objek,
       atwrt   type cawn-atwrt,
       end of itab5.
DATA : BEGIN OF itab_final1 OCCURS 0,
       matnr      TYPE s031-matnr,
       lgort      TYPE s031-lgort,
       werks      TYPE s031-werks,
       spmon      TYPE s031-spmon,
       magbb      type S031-magbb,
       wagbb      type S031-wagbb,
       azubb      type S031-azubb,
       aagbb      type S031-aagbb,
       maktx      TYPE makt-maktx,
       ekgrp      type marc-ekgrp,
       mbwbest    type s032-mbwbest,
       wbwbest    type s032-wbwbest,
       END OF itab_final1.
DATA : BEGIN OF itab_final OCCURS 0,
       matnr      TYPE s031-matnr,
       lgort      TYPE s031-lgort,
       werks      TYPE s031-werks,
       spmon      TYPE s031-spmon,
       magbb      type S031-magbb,
       wagbb      type S031-wagbb,
       azubb      type S031-azubb,
       aagbb      type S031-aagbb,
       maktx      TYPE makt-maktx,
       ekgrp      type marc-ekgrp,
       mbwbest    type s032-mbwbest,
       wbwbest    type s032-wbwbest,
       atwrt      type cawn-atwrt,
       END OF itab_final.
select-options:s_matnr for s031-matnr.
start-of-selection.
select matnr lgort werks spmon magbb wagbb azubb aagbb
        from s031 into table itab1
        where matnr in s_matnr.
if not itab1[] is initial.
    select matnr maktx from makt into table itab2 for all entries in itab1 where matnr = itab1-matnr.
if not itab2[] is initial.
   select matnr werks ekgrp from marc into table itab3 for all entries in itab2 where matnr = itab2-matnr.
if not itab3[] is initial.
   select matnr werks mbwbest wbwbest from s032 into corresponding fields of table itab4 for all entries in itab3 where matnr = itab3-matnr.
*if not itab4[] is initial.
   select atwrt from cawn into corresponding fields of table itab5.*
     endif.
   endif.
endif.
endif.
end-of-selection.
loop at itab3.
   itab_final-matnr = itab3-matnr.
   read table itab2 with key matnr = itab3-matnr.
   if sy-subrc = 0.
    itab_final-maktx = itab2-maktx.
   read table itab1 with key matnr = itab2-matnr.
   if sy-subrc = 0.
    itab_final-lgort = itab1-lgort.
    itab_final-werks = itab1-werks.
    itab_final-spmon = itab1-spmon.
    itab_final-magbb = itab1-magbb.
    itab_final-wagbb = itab1-wagbb.
    itab_final-azubb = itab1-azubb.
    itab_final-aagbb = itab1-aagbb.
endif.
   endif.
   itab_final-ekgrp = itab3-ekgrp.
read table itab4 with key matnr = itab3-matnr.
if sy-subrc = 0.
itab_final-mbwbest = itab4-mbwbest.
endif.
itab_final-wbwbest = itab4-wbwbest.
append itab_final.
clear itab_final.
endloop.
WRITE: /2 'material', 23 'storagelocation',29 'plant',35 'date',44 'val.stock.issue',66 'val.stock.issue.value',86 'no.of.stock.receipts',97 'no.of.stock.issues',150 'material.des', 160 'pur.group',190 'stock.val',210 'stock.quan'.
ULINE.
loop at itab_final.
WRITE: /2 itab_final-matnr, 23 itab_final-lgort,29 itab_final-werks,35 itab_final-spmon,44 itab_final-magbb,66 itab_final-wagbb,86 itab_final-azubb,97 itab_final-aagbb,
           150 itab_final-maktx, 160 itab_final-ekgrp,190 itab_final-wbwbest,210 itab_final-mbwbest,itab_final-atwrt.
ENDLOOP.
Thanks&regds,
Sree.

Hi sree,
take join between s031-sptag ,ausp-datuvthen fetch records based on this condition.(itab1)
After retrieve records based on join condition between
ausp-atinn,ausp-adzhl and cawn-atinn,cawn-adzhl.(itab2)
Retrieve records using for all entries bet first join condition and second join condition.
use for all entries between itab1 and itab2.
it will work surely.
reaward points

Sorting Problem in FND_MENU_ENTRIES_TL Table

Hi,
FND_MENU_ENTRIES_TL Table storing the record FND_MENU_ENTRIES_TL_N1(MENU_ID,PROMPT,LANGUAGE) wise in R12. But whereas in 11i, records stored FND_MENU_ENTRIES_TL_U1(MENU_ID,ENTRY_SEQUENCE,LANGUAGE).
I am confused, whether i need to recreate the index in R12, so the records will get store MENU_ID,ENTRY_SEQUENCE,LANGUAGE wise.
Could any one please suggest me how to resolve this problem.
Thanks,
Praba T

815667 wrote:
Hi,
FND_MENU_ENTRIES_TL Table storing the record FND_MENU_ENTRIES_TL_N1(MENU_ID,PROMPT,LANGUAGE) wise in R12. But whereas in 11i, records stored FND_MENU_ENTRIES_TL_U1(MENU_ID,ENTRY_SEQUENCE,LANGUAGE).
I am confused, whether i need to recreate the index in R12, so the records will get store MENU_ID,ENTRY_SEQUENCE,LANGUAGE wise.
Could any one please suggest me how to resolve this problem.
Thanks,
Praba TPl do not abuse the forums by cross-posting in multiple forums
Sorting Problem in FND_MENU_ENTRIES_TL Table
Sorting Problem in FND_MENU_ENTRIES_TL Table
Your issue is related to EBS, not to database upgrades (which is the topic of this forum)
Srini

Probleme d'affichage table de dimension

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for