Problems installing patch cluster

hello. i recently installed solaris 8 x86 and was trying to install the solaris 8 x86 patch cluster. so i downloaded the zip file and then unzipped it a directory called patch. i then run the install_cluster file (as specified on the cluster_readme file) and get thru the prompt that says it will check for adequate space. After that, the script tries to install the patches, but fails on each one. every patch fails because it says the patch directory is not valid and returns the error code 1. i even tried manually installing a patch via the patchadd command and the same error message occurs.
can someone tell me what im doing wrong or forgot to do? many thx.
~fl~

If you open the directory in CDE's file manager, right click on the zipped file and select unzip. The cluster will be unzipped to a directory structure called x86_recommended or something of the sort. Change to that directory to run the patch cluster install script. The patch script is looking for that directory structure.
Lee

Similar Messages

Problem installing Patch to upgrade to Sun One 6.1SP7

Hi,
About a year ago, we installed Sun One 6.1 SP6. When the application was installed, it was installed to a the non-default location. Instead of /opt/SUNWwbsrv directory, we chose to install it to /app/netscape61.
Now that SP7 is available, I'm having problems installing the patch.
When I use patchadd, it says it cannot find SUNWwbsrv installation so it quits.
I've tried "patchadd -M /tmp/116648-19 -R /app/netscape61"
Where /tmp/116648-19 is the source patch directory and /app/netscape61 is where I installed netscape61SP6.
Can someone tell me the correct syntax to use?
Thanks,
Bruce

Hi Bruce,
Did you install 6.1 SP6 using the packages or using the point product(non package based)? If you had installed 6.1 SP6 as a point product, then patchadd is not the way to upgrade. You can check by running the pkginfo command as follows:
# pkginfo SUNWwbsvr
If the above command fails with "not found" then you probably have the point product(non package based install) of WS installed. In that case, you can upgrade using the SP7 bits from here:
http://www.sun.com/download/products.xml?id=45c90ca9
Hope it helps.
Thanks
Manish

Problem installing patch 118208-51

I am trying to install patch 118208-51 but i am getting following errors.
pkgadd: ERROR: The package <SUNWmsgco> is currently installed on the system in t
he
global zone. To install the new instance of this package in the global
zone only, you must specify the -G option. To install the new instance
of this package in all zones you must first remove the existing instance
of this package from the global zone first (via pkgrm) and then install
the new instance of this package in all zones.
pkgadd: ERROR: package <SUNWmsgco> cannot be installed on this system/zone
What should I do now.

Thanks Jay after installing the messaging server and ims patches my messaging server http service failure problem gone but after doing the calendar sso configuaion my calendar server httpd still unable to start.
Whats wrong there, do I need to install any other patch specialy for calendar server ?

Solaris boot problem after Patch cluster install

just wondering if anyone can assist. i have just installed solaris 10 x86 recommended patches on a 16 disks server. where first 2 disks are mirrored called rpool, and remaining 14 disks are raid z called spool. upon installing the patches successfully and rebooting server, i am coming up with the following error:
NOTICE: Can not read the pool label from '/pci@0,0/pci8086,25f8@4/pci111d,801c@0/pci111d,801c@4/pci108e,286@0/disk@0,0:a /pci@0,0/pci8086,25f8@4/pci111d,801c@0/pci111d,801c@4/pci108e,286@0/disk@1,0:a'
NOTICE: spa_import_rootpool: error 5, Inc. All rights reserved.
Cannot mount root on /pci@0,0/pci8086,25f8@4/pci111d,801c@0/pci111d,801c@4/pci108e,286@0/disk@0,0:a /pci@0,0/pci8086,25f8@4/pci111d,801c@0/pci111d,801c@4/pci108e,286@0/disk@1,0:a fstype zfs
panic[cpu0]/thread=fffffffffbc28820: vfs_mountroot: cannot mount root
fffffffffbc4b190 genunix:vfs_mountroot+323 ()
fffffffffbc4b1d0 genunix:main+a9 ()
fffffffffbc4b1e0 unix:_start+95 ()
skipping system dump - no dump device configured
rebooting...
It looks like the solaris 10 os cannot find zfs filesystem and keeps on rebooting in normal solaris os mode, but when I go to safe mode and type: zfs list, I can see zfs rpool (mirrored) file system and cannot see the zfs spool (raid z) file system, any ideas on how i can fix the boot problem and get zfs spool back in the safest way possible?...

Same problem here with actual recomended patch set.
NOTICE: Can not read the pool label from '/pci@0,0/pci10de,375@f/pci1000,3150@0/sd@0,0:a /pci@0,0/pci10de,375@f/pci1000,3150@0/sd@1,0:a'
NOTICE: spa_import_rootpool: error 5
Cannot mount root on /pci@0,0/pci10de,375@f/pci1000,3150@0/sd@0,0:a /pci@0,0/pci10de,375@f/pci1000,3150@0/sd@1,0:a fstype zfs
panic[cpu0]/thread=fffffffffbc28820: vfs_mountroot: cannot mount root
fffffffffbc4b190 genunix:vfs_mountroot+323 ()
fffffffffbc4b1d0 genunix:main+a9 ()
fffffffffbc4b1e0 unix:_start+95 ()
What the hell happened to the bootsektor or the pool or what ever?

Problem installing patch 5.1.0.44.6

i am trying to install the newley released 5.1.0.44.6 patch on our test acs boxe
5.1 running 5.1.0.44.3 before applying it to the our production boxes and i am getting this error message.
' this system failure occurred: Failed to access respository 5-1-0-44-6, Please verify that respository credentials are valid'
i know the message is clear but the thing is i dont find any where a place for credentials of the respository that i created and i was able to upload the patch from our ftp server using it.
any ideas ???

yes ftp open from my pc with the credentials
i removed the old repository and created new one
repository 5-1-0-44-6
url ftp://10.160.100.37
user ftp password hash 804817cce55176b74654eed48214d7997d0d7501
STCO1ACS1-1120/admin# patch install 5-1-0-44-6.tar.gpg 5-1-0-44-6
Do you want to save the current configuration ? (yes/no) [yes] ?
Generating configuration...
Saved the running configuration to startup successfully
% Manifest file not found in the bundle
STCO1ACS1-1120/admin#
and i tcpdump on my firewall and i saw tones of packet going forward and back ( so the communication is happening) but i got the same error message as earlier.

Problems Installing Patches

I have a zip file containing a patch I need to apply. Does this need to be unzipped to a specific directory? I have tried creating a directory named /patches and unzipping to there but when I add the patch via Admintool it says none of the packages in the patch are installed on this system. When I do a pkgchk however the packages are there, any ideas?

Try with patchadd command.
Example:
# patchadd <patchnumber>
Thanks,
Senthilkumar
Developer Technical Support
Sun Microsystems, Inc
http://www.sun.com/developers/support

Problem Installing patch 2 CDA

Hi, I'm trying to install CDA Context Directory Agent, but when I install the patch 2 (cda-patchbundle_1.0.0.011-2.i386.tar) , there's the error : "Manifest File not found".
So I checked the content of the patch 2 and there's no manifest file inside, but for patch 1 and 3 , they have a manifest file in their content.
Can anyone tell me what is the correct way to install these patches please?

Note:295900.1 helped me.
- renaming all the dll beginning with oci*.dll in the bin directory.
- reboot the PC
- restart the patchset install
- and it worked
Thank you All..

Management console problem after installing recommended patch cluster

Hello everyone.
I just got a new SUN 440 server, it didn't come with the solaris os installed and so I installed solaris 9 12/03 to it. The installation went fine and I could start the management console with no problems at all. Then I went to sunsolve.sun.com to download the latest recommended patch clusters for solaris 9 (this was yesterday Sept.-06-2006), I downloaded the file, checked it with md5sum, unzipped it, went to single user mode and ran the install_patch script. After the patch cluster finished installing I rebooted the server for the patches to take effect, I logged in, tried to run console management 2.1 and it starts OK but I cannot use any services it offers because it says (in the console events):
"Server Not Running: no solaris management console server was available on the specified server. Please ensure there is a Solaris Management Console server available on the specified host and that it is running"
When I click on "See Exception" I get (for a particular service that is... in this case com.sun.admin.fsmgr.client.VFsMgr - for managing file systems):
java.rmi.RemoteException: Server RMI is null:
at sun.com.management.viperimpl.client.ViperClient.lookupServer(ViperClient.java:376)and so on...
I already checked that the service is running on port 898 and it seems that there is no other app. using that same port. I also restarted the service using /etc/init.d.init stop/status/start but I get the same results.
I don't know solaris very much and don't know what else to do, please help.
Thanks in advance.

Well, I guess what you see isn't what you get.
Guess I'm used to the fact USENET just left things formatted the way they were :-O

Problem: installing Recommend Patch Cluster: patch 140900-10 fails

I don't know if this is correct location for this thread (admin/moderator move as required).
We have a number of Solaris x86 hosts (ie 4) and I'm trying to get the patched and up to date.
I obtained the latest Recommended Patch Cluster (dated 28Sep2010).
I installed it on host A yesterday, 2 hours 9 mins, no problems.
I tried to install it on host B today, and that was just a critical failure.
Host B failed to install 140900-01, because the non global zones rejected the patch because dependancy 138218-01 wasn't installed in the non global zones.
Looking closer, it appears that 138218-01 is for global zone installation only; so it makes sense that the non global zones rejected it.
However, both hosts were in single user mode when installing the cluster and both hosts have non global zones.
140900-01 installed on host A with log:
| This appears to be an attempt to install the same architecture and
| version of a package which is already installed. This installation
| will attempt to overwrite this package.
|
| Dryrun complete.
| No changes were made to the system.
|
| This appears to be an attempt to install the same architecture and
| version of a package which is already installed. This installation
| will attempt to overwrite this package.
|
|
| Installation of <SUNWcsu> was successful.
140900-1 failed on host B with this log:
| Validating patches...
|
| Loading patches installed on the system...
|
| Done!
|
| Loading patches requested to install.
|
| Done!
|
| Checking patches that you specified for installation.
|
| Done!
|
|
| Approved patches will be installed in this order:
|
| 140900-01
|
|
| Preparing checklist for non-global zone check...
|
| Checking non-global zones...
|
| Checking non-global zones...
|
| Restoring state for non-global zone X...
| Restoring state for non-global zone Y...
| Restoring state for non-global zone Z...
|
| This patch passes the non-global zone check.
|
| None.
|
|
| Summary for zones:
|
| Zone X
|
| Rejected patches:
| 140900-01
| Patches that passed the dependency check:
| None.
|
|
| Zone Y
|
| Rejected patches:
| 140900-01
| Patches that passed the dependency check:
| None.
|
|
| Zone Z
|
| Rejected patches:
| 140900-01
| Patches that passed the dependency check:
| None.
|
| Fatal failure occurred - impossible to install any patches.
| X: For patch 140900-01, required patch 138218-01 does not exist.
| Y: For patch 140900-01, required patch 138218-01 does not exist.
| Z: For patch 140900-01, required patch 138218-01 does not exist.
| Fatal failure occurred - impossible to install any patches.
| ----
| patchadd exit code : 1
| application of 140900-01 failed : unhandled subprocess exit status '1' (exit 1 b
| ranch)
| finish time : 2010.10.02 09:47:18
| FINISHED : application of 140900-01
It looks as if the patch strategy is completely different for the two hosts; both are solaris x86 (A is a V40z; B is a V20z).
Trying to use "-G" with patchadd crabs the patch is for global zones only and stops (ie it's almost as if it thinks installation is being attempted in a non global zone).
Without "-G" same behavior as patch cluster install attempt (no surprise there).
I have inherited this machines; I am told each of these machines were upgraded to Solaris 10u6 in June 2009.
Other than the 4-5 months it took oracle to get our update entitlement to us, we've had no problems.
I'm at a loss here, I don't see anyone else having this type of issue.
Can someone point the way...?
What am I missing...?

Well, I guess what you see isn't what you get.
Guess I'm used to the fact USENET just left things formatted the way they were :-O

Problem install Recommended Patch cluster

Trying to install the Recommended patch cluster on Ultra 45s, on each one, the 40th patch, 120272-28, fails, and I don't understand why. Here's the snippet from the log:
STARTING : application of 120272-28
start time : 2010.11.30 08:41:42
# /usr/sbin/patchadd 120272-28
Validating patches...
Loading patches installed on the system...
Done!
Loading patches requested to install.
Done!
The following requested patches have packages not installed on the system
Package SUNWsmaS from directory SUNWsmaS in patch 120272-28 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNWsmaS will not be applied to the system.
Checking patches that you specified for installation.
Done!
The following requested patches will not be installed because
they are incompatible with patches already installed or with
other patches that you have specified for installation. In order to install these
requested patches you should resolve this incompatibility
by removing incompatible patches from requested-to-install set
or from the system.
0 Patch 120272-28 is declared as incompatible by IDR138540-01, which has already been installed on the system.
No patches to install.
patchadd exit code : 3
application of 120272-28 failed : unhandled subprocess exit status '3' (exit n branch)
finish time : 2010.11.30 08:41:42
FINISHED : application of 120272-28
I don't understand why it fails, rather than just being "skipped", as several other patches are. I assume the failure isn't coming from the fact that it's been declared incompatible, but rather the "unhandled subprocess exit status". How do I determine what that is?
Or, better yet, how do I tell the installcluster script to just not do that one?
Thanks!

did you try and removed the IDR? I.e: patchrm IDR138540-01 ?
.7/M.

Non priviledged commands fail after patch cluster install

For several years, to allow users to access system functions for higher clock resolutions in their
applications, we have made the following mods to two files (per Sun recommendations):
In the /etc/system file, add lines:
* 10 ms clock resolution*
set higher_tick = 1*
In /etc/user_attr, add:
dssuser::::type=normal;defaultpriv=proc_clock_highres,file_link_any,proc_info,proc_session,proc_fork,proc_exec
Everything was fine until I installed the latest patch cluster (from 2-14-2011) on our Netra 210. No issues installing the cluster. Upon reboot, the dssuser cannot do some simple things, like use ftp or ping. Messages like this:
ping: unknown host
ftp: socket: Permission denied.
The root user has no problems using any of these commands. As soon as I comment out the dssuser line from the /etc/user_attr file, everything works as expected. But we need the highres clock settings for our applications. I am unfamiliar with the workings and intent of the entries in user_attr so any help would be most appreciated.
Mark

The problem is that after patch implementation, the special privileges for any user defined in the /etc/user_attr file were modified to append the string "!net_privaddr" specifically denying use of common commands ping and ftp for example. The output of ppriv:
$ ppriv $$
14870: -sh
flags = <none>
E: basic,proc_clock_highres,!net_privaddr
I: basic,proc_clock_highres,!net_privaddr
P: basic,proc_clock_highres,!net_privaddr
L: all
I had to add the keyword net_privaddr in the user_attr file like:
dssuser::::type=normal;defaultpriv=proc_clock_highres,file_link_any,proc_info,proc_session,proc_fork,proc_exec,net_privaddr
to get past this problem. A bug or what?

August Patch Cluster Problems

Has anyone had the following issue after installing the latest Patch Cluster?
After a reboot I get
couldn't set locale correctly
To correct this I have to edit /etc/default/init
and remove
LC_COLLATE=en_GB.ISO8859-1
LC_CTYPE=en_GB.ISO8859-1
LC_MESSAGES=C
LC_MONETARY=en_GB.ISO8859-1
LC_NUMERIC=en_GB.ISO8859-1
LC_TIME=en_GB.ISO8859-1
If I then create a flash archive and use this flash archive the jumpstart process then puts the locale info back and the problem appears again.
It's not critical as I don't need to be on the latest Patch Cluster but would wondered if I'm the only one having issues?

If you open the directory in CDE's file manager, right click on the zipped file and select unzip. The cluster will be unzipped to a directory structure called x86_recommended or something of the sort. Change to that directory to run the patch cluster install script. The patch script is looking for that directory structure.
Lee

SPARC10 not booting after 2.5.1 Recommended Patch Cluster Install

Hi everyone,
Just finished installing the "latest" patch cluster on my ancient SPARC10, and now it doesn't boot. Here's what I see:
ok boot /iommu/sbus/espdma@f,400000/esp@f,800000/sd@0,0
screen not found.
Can't open input device.
Keyboard not present. Using tty for input and output.
SPARCstation 10 (1 X 390Z55), No Keyboard
ROM Rev. 2.25, 112 MB memory installed, Serial #6332710.
Ethernet address 8:0:20:12:7f:99, Host ID: 7260a126.
Rebooting with command: /iommu/sbus/espdma@f,400000/esp@f,800000/sd@0,0
Boot device: /iommu/sbus/espdma@f,400000/esp@f,800000/sd@0,0 File and args:
not found: abort_enable
not found: abort_enable
not found: tod_validate
not found: tod_fault_reset
krtld: error during initial load/link phase
Memory Address not Aligned
Type help for more information
ok
At first I thought I had a RAM problem. I've swapped RAM, but that didn't make it boot. I then thought I had a system board problem. I've swapped that as well, and still no dice. I wish I'd have kept the list of patches that successfully installed like my gut told me to, but I didn't. Searching Google and the Sun websites didn't turn up any fixes to the problem, so I'm hoping I can find help here.
Did the patches clobber something the machine needs to boot? I believe the OS disks are mirrored, and I've tried booting off each submirror, but the result is the same.
If I can avoid booting off of CD-ROM, that would be ideal since I don't have an external CD-ROM available to boot from.
Thanks for any help!

Ouch !
Haven't seen that one in years !
It's your choice of that ancient Operating Environment, combined with a cpu faster than 419MHz.
I hope you still have the extra OECD disk that was packed with that system when it was first shipped from Sun.
Otherwise you may just be out of luck with using Solaris 2.5.1
Here's a link at a non-Sun 3rd party web site to SRDB document *20576*
http://www.sunshack.org/data/sh/2.1/infoserver.central/data/syshbk/collections/intsrdb/20576.html
Perhaps MAAL and haroldb can contribute their thoughts on this.

Problem with installing patch SP1b

Hello All,
I have a development server running on XP pro with live cycle 8.0.1. I 'm facing a problem while installing patch SP1b to that server. I have attached the log file.
My problem is
I copied a process' .lca file from a server running on windows server 2003 with patch installed and deployed on the development server. Now in my development XP box, workspace is opening but when i tried to open the process, before rendering the pdf form it is giving "An error occurred during the operation (endpoint id 401). (ALC-WKS-007-027)" error. I have even crosschecked the input xfaform variable also; every thing is perfect. The details are as below:
The Server from which i copied is: (windows server 2003)
License Type: Full Version: 8.0.1
Patch Version: SP1b
Expired Date: Not Applicable
Installed Components
Product
Version
Patch
License Type
LiveCycle Process Management ES
8.0.1
SP1b
Full
LiveCycle Forms ES
8.0.1
SP1b
Full
The server to which i deployed is: (xp pro)
License Type: Full Version: 8.0.1
Patch Version:
Expired Date: Not Applicable
Installed Components
Product
Version
Patch
License Type
LiveCycle Process Management ES
8.0.1
Full
LiveCycle Business Activity Monitoring ES
8.0.1
Full
LiveCycle Forms ES
8.0.1
Full
Will that patch version could be the problem? What could be the problem and what is the solution?
Thanks
Deepak

Anybody knows the answer?

Java desktop problem after patch 118870-01 install

FYI
Java desktop stopped functioning properly after the installation of patch 118870-01, part of the recommended patch cluster.
Symptoms included no longer being able to launch mozilla, and upon reboot, no longer being able to login to java desktop.
patchrm 118870-01 fixed the problem.

Found that patch 119593-01 also appears to be causing the problem, along with patch 118870-01.
Fun :)

Problems installing patch cluster

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for