Problems issueing goods to customer

hi mine is make to order production. i ve created a sales order for a material . with strategy 40 in mrp 3 view. they ran mrp for sales order.
a planned order was generated. and then production and goods receipt was done to the SL.after that when i am trying to do Vl01n
no schedule lines due for delivery up to selection date.its not allowing me to issue goods to the customer.i checked the mmbe transaction for materials.they are in sales order stock unrestricted use.
how to solve this.

Hi there,
In a delivery, availability check is usually done at the storage loc level.
In an MTO scenario, goods are GR'ed into a specific storage loc.
So check what storage loc rule is assigned to the delivery type (SPRO --> Logictics Execution --> Shipping --> picking --> Define picking location --> Assign rule for picking location). for eg MALA for LF. MALA is shipping poijt / plant / storage conditons. ALso you have RETA, MARE & any other custom routine.
Then check in OVL3 what storaeg loc determination is maintained for the combination shipping point / plant / storage conditions.
In MMBE give that storage loc & do the availability check.
In our company MTO items are GR'ed into a specific storage loc. Check the same in your company.
Also in the sales order --> Item --> schedule lines you will find 2 dates. The material will be confirmed against the date in the 2nd line (that is the material availability date). Give that date in VL01N, shipping point, sales order to create delivery.
Regards,
Sivanand

Similar Messages

Problem in Goods Issue against process order

Dear All,
I m facing the problem in Goods issance, I have one raw material batch whose last GR date is 01.09.2010. when i try to post Goods issue, posting date 29.09.2010. system generate the following error message:
Deficit of BA Unrestr. prev. 25.00 KG: Material Number Plant storage location batch
then i try to post the same in 01.10.2010. it allow me to post Goods Issuance
Thanks

HI
Check the stock of the material/plant/batch/storage loc in T code MB5B for the previous period for 09.2010.as there is no stock in the system for that batch and period system doesnt allow you to do GI.
Also check stock in MMBE or MB5B in current period as stock is present in current period, system allows you to do GI.
Regards
Anupam Sharma

Facing some problems in creating a custom tabs in CRMD_ORDER Transaction

Hi Friends,
I am facing some problems in creating a custom tabs in CRMD_ORDER Transaction code in Solution Manager of SAP.
Actually my requirement is adding of two tabs(one is header & another is item tab) in the above Transaction, i was able to put one tab i.e header tab but i was not able to keep item tab. i found a badi CRM_CUSTOMER_I_BADI in which documentation was given & i processed in the same way.
For information i used the Badi CRM_CUSTOMER_H_BADI for header tab which i was able to add the tab & all functions like change, save working Good.
But i want how to add custom tab in which item details were to be attached.
i was done with the necessary SPRO settings(or Tcode CRMV_SSV) & able to see the 2 tabs thats it, but the functionality save is not working for the second tab & not saving in table CRMD_CUSTOMER_I (in this table there is one CI include where we added our item fields).
And also i had a doubt whether to use ALV or Table Control. And if possible can any one can sent me the screen design & the code for the above requirement in detail.
can any one who have knoweldge in Solution Manager & in the above Badi implementation can give me a right solution which will help me a lot.
Thanks a lot in advance.
Thanks
Ravi.
can any one give the solution regarding to the above one.
Edited by: ravikanth on Jul 23, 2008 8:13 AM

Hello Priyanka,
I have the same problem by using Service Ticket in SAP CRM 5.0.
Did you already solved this issue? If so, can you please provide the solution!?
How can I activate and check the transfer log?
Thanks and regards
Alex

Problem in creation of Customer Master

Hi gurus,
I am facing problem in creation of customer master.
I have created a account group zz01 copying from 0001.which has internal no. assignement for the customer.
Now i am trying to create a customer master, at partner functions level under sales area data... the system is asking for the no. for each partner functions.. when i tried to manually enter, the system is not taking any number nor it is letting me save the data.
Please help me out in acertaining, what could be the issue.
regards
Gupta
[email protected]

its due to the number ranges that is specified in the partner determination ... chech what is the number range assigned in the parner determination ,,, so once u check that u have to manually enter the number between that range only .. this should solve ur problem...
path to check the number range is as below :
spro-img-logistic generalbusiness partner-customers---define account groups and field selection ---
at this point click position button at the bottom and give ur account group .. select ur account group and click detail button .. now inside that u can see the specified number range .. dafault is 08 ( means u can specify between 400000 to 499999)..
and some times u may not have defined number range... check urs and create accordingly ... this should solve ur problem...
rewards if solved ..
thank you
madhan

Return of Goods from Customer to a Manufacturing Plant

Hi,
This is a scenario of Return of Goods from Customer to a Manufacturing Plant and Excise Registers RG23A Part 1 and RG23A Part 2 need to be updated. As the material is finished goods so its material type in J1ID is RG1 in the manufacturing plant.
Can any one provide some idea that what process should be followed so that Excise Registers RG23A Part 1 and RG23A Part 2 can be updated after taking it back from the customer?
Thanks in advance

Hi,
The issue is only with RG23A Part 1 Register. The RG23A Part 2 is already getting updated through J1IH (with reference to the Return Delivery Document).
After updating the RG23A Part 2 Register if we capture excise invoice without purchase order in J1IEX, it would update RG23A Part 1 as well as Part 2. So, RG23A Part 2 would be updated twice.
If we don't use J1IH at all, then it can be possible to update RG23A Part 1 and Part 2 in J1IEX (without purchase order) but this transaction won't be linked to previous transaction(s) and everything needs to be entered manually.
Can you please provide any alternate solution?
Thanks in advance

Good Issue & Good Receipt

Hi Members,
I am having a requirement like this,we want to generate Good Issue & Good Receipt Document targeting a Customer or Vendor.
because we use that documents for inter division transactions. can any one help me.
thank you,
saman

Dear Saman,
See the Goods receipts and goods issue only deal with the inventory.
as you already told the you need division wise P& L account to Manage so as per me i think you have to create department as a BP and Post the Goods receipts PO and Delivery document.
You have to create the Division wise warehouse.
it help you to manage your Financial also.
Regrds
MANGESH PAGDHARE

Goods Issue & Goods Receipt

Gurus,
What standard smartform can be assigned in NACE for Goods issue & Goods receipt slip for multiple items

Hi ,
The smartforms program SAPFM07P_SMART can be used for printing goods receipt 'individual' slip using transaction MIGO.
However this program cannot be used for printing goods receipt 'collective' slip.
In order to print collective slips, please use output type WE03. The
processing routine for WE03 selects all items of a material document.In
transaction M708 or in the following customizing:
Materials Management
   -> Inventory Management and Physical Inventory
      -> Output Determination
         -> Maintain Output Determination Procedures
            Activity: Conditions: Procedure.
Please use requirement 173 for WE03 so that a collective slip will only
be printed once for a material document. If you have no requirement for
output type WE03, you will have a collective slip for each item.
Also maintain Version for printing of GR/GI slip as '3' Collective slip
in transaction OMBR for Tcode MIGO.
In the customizing for "Maintain Output Types" or M706 the standard form
is WESCHEINVERS3 should be assigned to the output type WE03 under the
"Processing routines".
Also please refer to the following useful notes for additional
information:
522591 FAQ: IM output determination
426554 Check list for output determination for goods movements
411013 Additional documentation on output determination in MM-IM
Regards,
Jana

Performance issue with a Custom view

Hi ,
I am pretty new to performance tuning and facing a performance issue with a custom view.
Execution time for view query is good but as soon as I append a where caluse to view query ,the execution time increases.
Below is the view query:
CREATE OR REPLACE XXX_INFO_VIEW AS
SELECT csb.system_id license_id,
cst.name license_number ,
csb.system_type_code license_type ,
csb.attribute3 lac , -- license authorization code
csb.attribute6 lat , -- license admin token
csb.attribute12 ols_reg, -- OLS Registration allowed flag
l.attribute4 license_biz_type ,
NVL (( SELECT 'Y' l_supp_flag
FROM csi_item_instances cii,
okc_k_lines_b a,
okc_k_items c
WHERE c.cle_id = a.id
AND a.lse_id = 9
AND c.jtot_object1_code = 'OKX_CUSTPROD'
AND c.object1_id1 = cii.instance_id||''
AND cii.instance_status_id IN (3, 510)
AND cii.system_id = csb.system_id
AND a.sts_code IN ('SIGNED', 'ACTIVE')
AND NVL (a.date_terminated, a.end_date) > SYSDATE
AND ROWNUM < 2), 'N') active_supp_flag,
hp.party_name "Customer_Name" , -- Customer Name
hca.attribute12 FGE_FLAG,
(SELECT /*+INDEX (oklt OKC_K_LINES_TL_U1) */
nvl(max((decode(name, 'eSupport','2','Enterprise','1','Standard','1','TERM RTU','0','TERM RTS','0','Notfound'))),0) covName --TERM RTU and TERM RTS added as per Vijaya's suggestion APR302013
FROM OKC_K_LINES_B oklb1,
OKC_K_LINES_TL oklt,
OKC_K_LINES_B oklb2,
OKC_K_ITEMS oki,
CSI_item_instances cii
WHERE
OKI.JTOT_OBJECT1_CODE = 'OKX_CUSTPROD'
AND oklb1.id=oklt.id
AND OKI.OBJECT1_ID1 =cii.instance_id||''
AND Oklb1.lse_id=2
AND oklb1.dnz_chr_id=oklb2.dnz_chr_id
AND oklb2.lse_id=9
AND oki.CLE_ID=oklb2.id
AND cii.system_id=csb.system_id
AND oklt.LANGUAGE=USERENV ('LANG')) COVERAGE_TYPE
FROM csi_systems_b csb ,
csi_systems_tl cst ,
hz_cust_accounts hca,
hz_parties hp,
fnd_lookup_values l
WHERE csb.system_type_code = l.lookup_code (+)
AND csb.system_id = cst.system_id
AND hca.cust_account_id =csb.customer_id
AND hca.party_id= hp.party_id
AND cst.language = USERENV ('LANG')
AND l.lookup_type (+) = 'CSI_SYSTEM_TYPE'
AND l.language (+) = USERENV ('LANG')
AND NVL (csb.end_date_active, SYSDATE+1) > SYSDATE)
I have forced an index to avoid Full table scan on OKC_K_LINES_TL and suppressed an index on CSI_item_instances.instance id to make the view query fast.
So when i do select * from XXX_INFO_VIEWit executes in a decent time,But when I try to do
select * from XXX_INFO_VIEW where active_supp_flag='Y' and coverage_type='1'
it takes lot of time.
Execution plan is same for both queries in terms of cost but with WHERE clause Number of bytes increases.
Below are the execution plans:
View query:
SELECT STATEMENT ALL_ROWS Cost: 7,212 Bytes: 536,237 Cardinality: 3,211
 10 COUNT STOPKEY
 9 NESTED LOOPS
 7 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 1,085 Bytes: 101 Cardinality: 1
 5 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 487 Bytes: 17,043 Cardinality: 299
 2 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE CSI.CSI_ITEM_INSTANCES Cost: 22 Bytes: 2,325 Cardinality: 155
 1 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX CSI.CSI_ITEM_INSTANCES_N07 Cost: 3 Cardinality: 315
 4 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE OKC.OKC_K_ITEMS Cost: 3 Bytes: 84 Cardinality: 2
 3 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX OKC.OKC_K_ITEMS_N2 Cost: 2 Cardinality: 2
 6 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) OKC.OKC_K_LINES_B_U1 Cost: 1 Cardinality: 1
 8 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE OKC.OKC_K_LINES_B Cost: 2 Bytes: 44 Cardinality: 1
 12 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE AR.HZ_CUST_ACCOUNTS Cost: 2 Bytes: 7 Cardinality: 1
 11 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) AR.HZ_CUST_ACCOUNTS_U1 Cost: 1 Cardinality: 1
 28 SORT AGGREGATE Bytes: 169 Cardinality: 1
 27 NESTED LOOPS
 25 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 16,549 Bytes: 974,792 Cardinality: 5,768
 23 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 5,070 Bytes: 811,737 Cardinality: 5,757
 20 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 2,180 Bytes: 56,066 Cardinality: 578
 17 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 967 Bytes: 32,118 Cardinality: 606
 14 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE CSI.CSI_ITEM_INSTANCES Cost: 22 Bytes: 3,465 Cardinality: 315
 13 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX CSI.CSI_ITEM_INSTANCES_N07 Cost: 3 Cardinality: 315
 16 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE OKC.OKC_K_ITEMS Cost: 3 Bytes: 84 Cardinality: 2
 15 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX OKC.OKC_K_ITEMS_N2 Cost: 2 Cardinality: 2
 19 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE OKC.OKC_K_LINES_B Cost: 2 Bytes: 44 Cardinality: 1
 18 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) OKC.OKC_K_LINES_B_U1 Cost: 1 Cardinality: 1
 22 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE OKC.OKC_K_LINES_B Cost: 5 Bytes: 440 Cardinality: 10
 21 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX OKC.OKC_K_LINES_B_N2 Cost: 2 Cardinality: 9
 24 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) OKC.OKC_K_LINES_TL_U1 Cost: 1 Cardinality: 1
 26 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE OKC.OKC_K_LINES_TL Cost: 2 Bytes: 28 Cardinality: 1
 43 HASH JOIN Cost: 7,212 Bytes: 536,237 Cardinality: 3,211
 41 NESTED LOOPS
 39 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 7,070 Bytes: 485,792 Cardinality: 3,196
 37 HASH JOIN Cost: 676 Bytes: 341,972 Cardinality: 3,196
 32 HASH JOIN RIGHT OUTER Cost: 488 Bytes: 310,012 Cardinality: 3,196
 30 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE APPLSYS.FND_LOOKUP_VALUES Cost: 7 Bytes: 544 Cardinality: 17
 29 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) APPLSYS.FND_LOOKUP_VALUES_U1 Cost: 3 Cardinality: 17
 31 TABLE ACCESS FULL TABLE CSI.CSI_SYSTEMS_B Cost: 481 Bytes: 207,740 Cardinality: 3,196
 36 VIEW VIEW AR.index$_join$_013 Cost: 187 Bytes: 408,870 Cardinality: 40,887
 35 HASH JOIN
 33 INDEX FAST FULL SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) AR.HZ_CUST_ACCOUNTS_U1 Cost: 112 Bytes: 408,870 Cardinality: 40,887
 34 INDEX FAST FULL SCAN INDEX AR.HZ_CUST_ACCOUNTS_N2 Cost: 122 Bytes: 408,870 Cardinality: 40,887
 38 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) AR.HZ_PARTIES_U1 Cost: 1 Cardinality: 1
 40 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE AR.HZ_PARTIES Cost: 2 Bytes: 45 Cardinality: 1
 42 TABLE ACCESS FULL TABLE CSI.CSI_SYSTEMS_TL Cost: 142 Bytes: 958,770 Cardinality: 63,918
Execution plan for view query with WHERE clause:
SELECT STATEMENT ALL_ROWS Cost: 7,212 Bytes: 2,462,837 Cardinality: 3,211
 10 COUNT STOPKEY
 9 NESTED LOOPS
 7 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 1,085 Bytes: 101 Cardinality: 1
 5 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 487 Bytes: 17,043 Cardinality: 299
 2 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE CSI.CSI_ITEM_INSTANCES Cost: 22 Bytes: 2,325 Cardinality: 155
 1 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX CSI.CSI_ITEM_INSTANCES_N07 Cost: 3 Cardinality: 315
 4 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE OKC.OKC_K_ITEMS Cost: 3 Bytes: 84 Cardinality: 2
 3 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX OKC.OKC_K_ITEMS_N2 Cost: 2 Cardinality: 2
 6 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) OKC.OKC_K_LINES_B_U1 Cost: 1 Cardinality: 1
 8 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE OKC.OKC_K_LINES_B Cost: 2 Bytes: 44 Cardinality: 1
 12 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE AR.HZ_CUST_ACCOUNTS Cost: 2 Bytes: 7 Cardinality: 1
 11 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) AR.HZ_CUST_ACCOUNTS_U1 Cost: 1 Cardinality: 1
 28 SORT AGGREGATE Bytes: 169 Cardinality: 1
 27 NESTED LOOPS
 25 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 16,549 Bytes: 974,792 Cardinality: 5,768
 23 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 5,070 Bytes: 811,737 Cardinality: 5,757
 20 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 2,180 Bytes: 56,066 Cardinality: 578
 17 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 967 Bytes: 32,118 Cardinality: 606
 14 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE CSI.CSI_ITEM_INSTANCES Cost: 22 Bytes: 3,465 Cardinality: 315
 13 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX CSI.CSI_ITEM_INSTANCES_N07 Cost: 3 Cardinality: 315
 16 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE OKC.OKC_K_ITEMS Cost: 3 Bytes: 84 Cardinality: 2
 15 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX OKC.OKC_K_ITEMS_N2 Cost: 2 Cardinality: 2
 19 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE OKC.OKC_K_LINES_B Cost: 2 Bytes: 44 Cardinality: 1
 18 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) OKC.OKC_K_LINES_B_U1 Cost: 1 Cardinality: 1
 22 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE OKC.OKC_K_LINES_B Cost: 5 Bytes: 440 Cardinality: 10
 21 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX OKC.OKC_K_LINES_B_N2 Cost: 2 Cardinality: 9
 24 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) OKC.OKC_K_LINES_TL_U1 Cost: 1 Cardinality: 1
 26 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE OKC.OKC_K_LINES_TL Cost: 2 Bytes: 28 Cardinality: 1
 44 VIEW VIEW APPS.WRS_LICENSE_INFO_V Cost: 7,212 Bytes: 2,462,837 Cardinality: 3,211
 43 HASH JOIN Cost: 7,212 Bytes: 536,237 Cardinality: 3,211
 41 NESTED LOOPS
 39 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 7,070 Bytes: 485,792 Cardinality: 3,196
 37 HASH JOIN Cost: 676 Bytes: 341,972 Cardinality: 3,196
 32 HASH JOIN RIGHT OUTER Cost: 488 Bytes: 310,012 Cardinality: 3,196
 30 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE APPLSYS.FND_LOOKUP_VALUES Cost: 7 Bytes: 544 Cardinality: 17
 29 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) APPLSYS.FND_LOOKUP_VALUES_U1 Cost: 3 Cardinality: 17
 31 TABLE ACCESS FULL TABLE CSI.CSI_SYSTEMS_B Cost: 481 Bytes: 207,740 Cardinality: 3,196
 36 VIEW VIEW AR.index$_join$_013 Cost: 187 Bytes: 408,870 Cardinality: 40,887
 35 HASH JOIN
 33 INDEX FAST FULL SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) AR.HZ_CUST_ACCOUNTS_U1 Cost: 112 Bytes: 408,870 Cardinality: 40,887
 34 INDEX FAST FULL SCAN INDEX AR.HZ_CUST_ACCOUNTS_N2 Cost: 122 Bytes: 408,870 Cardinality: 40,887
 38 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) AR.HZ_PARTIES_U1 Cost: 1 Cardinality: 1
 40 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE AR.HZ_PARTIES Cost: 2 Bytes: 45 Cardinality: 1
 42 TABLE ACCESS FULL TABLE CSI.CSI_SYSTEMS_TL Cost: 142 Bytes: 958,770 Cardinality: 63,918

Hi,
You should always try using primary index fields, if not possible then secondary index fields.
Even if you cannot do anything from either of the two then try this,
Use Less distinct fields on the top.
In your case , you can use bukrs ,gjahr ,werks on the top in the where condition..then followed by less distinct values..
Even when you use secondary index if you have 4 fields in your sec index and you are using only two fields from the top then the index is useful only upto that two fields provided they are in sequence.

IDOC problem during goods confirmation in SRM

Hi guys,
I am facing some problem during goods confirmation in SRM.I am getting an error relate to IDOCs.i have setup the desired message and partner ID for goods confirmation in SRm but the IDOC gets stuck with the code 30 and the idicator is yellow.But when i manually reproces trhe IDOC after that it works fine.I dont want to process it manually.Can anyone help me out with the possible source of problem.
Regards,
Pawan.

Hi
Which SRM version are you using ?
Please see related links ->
Note 549846 - FAQ: Goods receipt confirmation EBP
Note 847250 - IDoc error remains in alert monitor although IDoc is ok
Othere related OSS Notes ->
Note 1049536 Incorrect reference doc year when deleting goods receipt
Note 683848 Problems with delivery note number with upper/lower case
Note 747422 Replace internal units with ISO codes - modification
Note 545657 Error in ERS procedure in back end: Delivery note missing
Note 338985 BBPCF & IV: incorrect IDocs in backend system
Note 561881 Posting of returns for partial confirmation not possible
Note 550884 Check of return delivery and reversal against back end
Note 514669 Goods receipt cannot be posted
Note 502869 Return delivery possible despite posted return delivery
Note 430153 Classic scenario: Goods receipt/issue slip, bill of lading
Note 360833 "Purchase order & is being processed", IDoc error
Note 388601 Follow-up processing for GR/SE confirmation is not possible
Do let me know.
Regards
- Atul

P6N Diamond: Problems, Issues, or just trials & tribulations?

P6N Diamond: Problems, Issues, or just trials & tribulations?
I've had some issues with my new pc (see my sig). I initially finished it about a month ago. It was running just fine
until 10 days ago. On 11/10, I finished the evening by adding 2 gb of material to Oblivion & then defragging w/Diskeeper 2k7
(the 3rd defrag that week). The next morning I turned the pc on & it posted normally but then the screen went blank,
except for the words "missing operating system". I restarted the pc a couple of times, which didn't help, I then checked
the bios, & the drive was properly listed. Next, I tried to repair the boot record w/Vista's Recovery Console (RC), however the
RC didn't see an OS, even after loading sata drivers. While pointing the RC to the drivers, I tried to access the C:, the RC
said that drive needed to be formatted. I took that to mean the drive was toast, so I ordered the Seagate (still tried to
fix the boot record through the command prompt using Dos repair commands-no luck), which arrived on 11/15.
That evening I loaded the new hdd & then Vista, after which came the vista updates, drivers, then some of my other basic
programs (diskeeper, firefox, foxit, etc.) & then I defragged. One thing that seemed odd to me about this new install was
that the 'bubbles' screensaver seemed sluggish, that is, less energetic than the first time through. After defragging I was
going to shutdown when another vista upgrade popped up, checked to see if it was important or recommended-it was important.
I clicked to install & it started to install & then the pc got hung up. I tried C-A-D, but it didn't work so I hit the reset
button, got back to the windows desktop, everything looked fine, so I decided to put the pc to bed & do the rest the next
day, the pc turned off gracefully.
11/16. I turned on the pc & it posted properly, but then went to a blue screen. I don't remember what the message was, something
about windows being unable to start, I think. I then hit C-A-D & then loaded the RC. The RC was able to see an OS this time,
so I clicked on it & the repair started. After a couple of minutes the repair finished & asked to restart, which I did. The
pc posted just fine again, but then went to another blue screen, but with a different message, as I recall. I did the RC thing
again, though this time after the repair was going for a few seconds, I was asked if I wanted go to an earlier restore point,
which I did. I was asked to restart again, I did & the pc booted all the to the desktop. I spent the rest of the day checking
out data corruption & diskeeper 2k7, I did find some forums where that was discussed. Though there was also mention of bad
memory causing data corruption as well-more to think about. The pc shutdown gracefully at bed time.
11/17. When I turned on the pc this day I didn't pay close attention, since I figured my pc problems were over, however when
I looked the screen it was black, no messages or anything. A point to the good was that the fans were running & the stylized
light on the XiFi card was lit. Still, a big '' was bouncing about in head. It seemed the pc didn't post. What was wrong:
the motherboard; the videocard; the ram; or, maybe the new hdd? So, I thought about the situation for while. Should I go to
a pro? Should I test my other, unused, ram stick? And, where did I put that damn diagnostic bracket that came with the mobo?
After a couple of hours, I decided to start the fixing process by hitting the reset button. Perhaps the pc did post earlier,
or at least partially, because the pc performed a partial post this time, with the message 'checksum bad' under the partial
component list. At the bottom of the screen was 'press f1 to setup.' I pressed f1 & got into the bios. In the bios, I
noticed several differences, particularly the sata controller being disabled & the boot list was messed up. I corrected
those & saved & exited. I then loaded the RC to see if any more repairs were needed, but none were. I restarted the pc &
it booted & loaded into vista quickly & cleanly. The pc has continued to boot cleanly the past three days while I've been
watching for hardware problems, mainly ram or cmos battery errors.
11/20. So, now what? I'm seriously considering reinstalling vista once more. I think my hardware is alright, I suspect
Saturday's problem was a conflict between the restore point & the bios. I'm ambivalent about diskeeper, I've bought it,
but I didn't buy it to beat myself over the head with.
If you've read this far would you do me the additional favor of telling me your opinion? I've noticed a fair amount of wisdom in this
forum & I think I could use a little extra input. Happy Thanksgiving!
Thank you all,
tryggvi

...The saga continues...
11/24. PC posted & went right to vista. I decided to test a different set of vid drivers so I installed th geforce 169.12 betas to see if that would eliminate the screensaver sluggishness I mentioned above-it did, the driver has been stable but I haven't pushed them either. PC ran fine all day & it shut down normally at the end of the day.
11/25. PC posted & went right to vista. I installed several programs (including auslogics defragger) & attached 3 sata (1 optical & 2 ext.hdds). Defragged in the middle of the afternoon & pc ran fine the rest of the day & shut down normally that night.
11/26. PC posted but the I got the "missing operating message." Damn! So, now I'm thinking defrag corruption, bad sata controller, or failing cmos battery. I tried to fix the vista install w/recovery console, but it couldn't even find an os. I also checked the bios during this time, everything was fine except that the time was off by a couple of hours. I did a clean install of vista again on a lean machine & then some basic programs. I turned of the pc a couple hours later and added 2 sata drives, the pc posted & loaded vista just fine.The pc shut down normally at the end of the day.
11/27. No apparent post. I hit the restart button, the pc then posted w/a 'checksum bad' message at the bottom. I got into the bios & found the following entries changed: time & date; full screen logo display; boot sequence; on board sata controller; and, boot from other devices. I reset these entries & saved & exited. The pc booted into vista just fine & ran normally the rest of the day, shutting down normally as well.
11/28. No apparent post again. Repeated the immediate above, the same entries were changed, so I reset them & the pc posted & vista loaded just fine. With the same changes happening 2 days in a row, & all the bad things happening after the pc being off over night, the problem seems fairly certainly to be a bad or failing cmos battery, especially since I haven't tried to flash the bios or shut down the pc improperly. In my research of cmos battery problems, it was recommended that you try to recharge the battery by leaving the pc on 24-48 hours before replacing the problem, so I'll leave the pc on until the evening of the 30th.
11/29. 36 hours plus & the pc is doing fine. Sorry for the journal, but it helps me think & gives others a clearer idea about what's been going on. Does anyone have any other ideas? My cmos battery is a 'KTS lithium cr2032', if need be can I replace this w/any other cr2032? Especially since I can't find a KTS one.
Thanks all,
tryggvi

Issue in setting custom identity service for soa 11.1.1.4

Hello,
I am facing issue in setting custom identity service for soa 11.1.1.4
It is not picking up the implemented UserManager (in custom IDM) implemented via ServiceProvider and IdentityStoreService.
This is configured in jps-config.xml
The same setup was working in soa 11.1.1.2
I believe there is a change done in JpsProvider in bpm-service.jar to authenticate via default login context from oracle.security.jps.internal.jaas.module.authentication.JpsUserAuthenticationLoginModule
If my uderstanding is correct,
Please guide me in implementing custom identity store and services for bpm services for soa 11.1.1.4
Tried various work arounds but no luck.
Thanks
Bala

Hi...
Can u tell me how did u set up custom identity service for 11.1.1.2 ?
Thanks

Customisation of goods issue,goods receipt,transfer posting,stock transfer

hi,
how to do customisation of goods issue,goods receipt,tranfer posting and stock transfer.
thanks
katrina

Hi,
You can do customization in following;
SPRO > MM > Inventory Management and Physical Inventory > Goods Issue / Transfer Postings
- Create Storage Location Automatically
- Set Manual Account Assignment
- Define Screen Layout
- Maintain Copy Rules for Reference Documents
- Set Up Dynamic Availability Check
- Generate Physical Inventory Documents for Goods Movements
- Allow Negative Stocks
And SPRO > MM > Inventory Management and Physical Inventory > Goods Receipt
- Set Tolerance Limits
- Create Storage Location Automatically
- Create Purchase Order Automatically
- Set Manual Account Assignment
- Define Screen Layout
- Maintain Copy Rules for Reference Documents
- Set Dynamic Availability Check
- Set "Delivery Completed" Indicator
- Set Missing Parts Check
- For GR-Based IV, Reversal of GR Despite Invoice
- Set Expiration Date Check
- Price Differences for Subcontract Orders at Goods Receipt
- Activate Storage of Incoming Documents

FREE GOODS FROM CUSTOMER N VENDOR

hi please give me some idea how free goods from customer and free goods from vendors are managed .please give me the process flow.
thanks n regards
rn sap mm

There is no Particular material type for free goods. You can create free goods po for any material type.
go to me21n and Input material and all other details same as other po and put tick mark against free items tab and save. as soon as you put tick mark ir Receipt indicator will be deactivated automatically as free item po doenot requires invoice verification.
You can receipt free goods same as other po. movement type 511 will takes place automatically for free item po
You can receipt free goods without po also use migo 511 material receipt with free of charge.
For Customer Free Goods Post the same in SD forum.
Please Search SDN before Posting into Forums.
This question is already answered number of times.

Issue check to customer

Hi Gurus,
I have a business scenario:
Customer comes to store and picks up the items and pay the item. I use F.13 to clear customer open items.
When customer comes for exchange, customer returns item and pick ups another item i receive return sales order for the full amount and fresh sales order for new item. I have one credit memo and one invoice for that customer. But i get only net payment(either customer paid or we paid to customer) from my front end application to SAP. Customer balance is zero now. Technically Customer has not paid yet. We have policy we issue check from HQ not from store. I can't use F110 or FCH5 or other mode of payments.
Example: Sales order triggers delivery and billing immediately.
Sales Order:$ 100
Payment: $100
F.13 cleared.
===========================
Exchange
Return sales order:$100
No payment
We have credit memo
Fresh sales order
SO: $ 60
Payment $ 40(We paid to customer)
There are 3 line items in customer:
1. Credit memo $ 100
2. Invoice $ 60
3. Payment $ 40
Balance is 0. But customer has not paid this $ 40 from store.
Requirement: We want to issue check to customer from SAP if i owe customer money. How can i achieve this?.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Jagadeesan

Resolved by myself...

Can any provide me problem issues on ABAP dictionary for practice?

Or any one can tell me the links in which problem issues on ABAP dictionary is there?
Moderator message : Don't ask for links & solution to vague requirements. Thread locked.
Edited by: Vinod Kumar on Jun 14, 2011 9:36 AM

Hi jessculter,
Thanks for your post.
I am sorry to hear about the problems you have been having lately.
Please send me in your details using the "Contact The Mods" link found in my profile and I will take it from there.
Cheers,
OlgaC
BTCare Community Mod
If we have asked you to email us with your details, please make sure you are logged in to the forum, otherwise you will not be able to see our ‘Contact Us’ link within our profiles.
We are sorry that we are unable to deal with service/account queries via the private message(PM) function so please don't PM your account info, we need to deal with this via our email account :-)
If someone answers your question correctly please let other members know by clicking on ’Mark as Accepted Solution’.

Problems issueing goods to customer

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for