Problems on Accounting Integration MLC

Hi Experts,
We are getting an error when trying to perform MLC in cProjects 4.0.
If turning on automatic MLC, we get the error Internal error: Calling costing leads to exception
If working with manual MLC, in the screen for searching PS projects
1. We don't get any of the search fields
2. We don't find any project in the system
As a test, I can say it is possible to create object links to WBS elements in the Object link tabs correctly.
Any idea on what can be failing here?
Thank you!
Kind regards,
Neil
Edited by: Neil Billqvist on Jun 6, 2008 12:41 PM

Hi Neil,
Internal error: Calling costing leads to exception --> use note 1019075.
for mannual please check the settings
-->spro
-->Collrabration project
-->Connection to External system
-->Account integration
-->define object link for account integration
In that page you will find two object type on right side table
one for WBS elemet and another for internal order
select: 0FIN_INT_ERP_PS
Then double click on Name of classes inSAP (letf hand side dialog structure)
then change the proxy class CL_R3_OLR3_PROJECTDEFINATION or CL_DPR_OLR3_WBSELEMENT
Also check project type details wether you have activated Accounting integration scenario if please activte
and please check is any project is created from PS module or not
and Also take help of note 977951
this note support for ECC 6.0 And cproject suit 4.00
thanks
sunil

Similar Messages

Problems with accounting integration cProjects

Dear Sirs,
I have some problems with accounting integration between my cProjects 3.10 and my ECC 5.0 system. I have followed the steps in the configuration guide as good I as can. However when I create a project, and go the accounting tab I get the following error:
The project is unknown in Accounting
Message no.
DPR_FIN_GECCO006
Diagnosis
Etc..
In the Cockpit for Controlling Integration I can see the following error at the time the project is created, and a new similar error is created when the status is set to released replicated.
No company code could be determined. Message No IAOM_CPROJECTS001.
In this message there is a reference to the fact that the company code can be set in the assigned model order for CPR1. I have created such a model order with a reference to company code 0100 for CPR1. However this does not seem to do the job.
I seem to be stuck, as I have tried every possible and unpossible lead to get any further. Any input for someone with the knowhow is highly appreciated.
Best regards,
Jørgen Ruud

Hello Jørgen,
It sounds strange, normally after create a model order and assigned to the scenario CPR1, then the determination of company code should work.
logic: CPR1 -> model order -> company code
Would you please try the note 875275, if it can help.
In case that it does not help, you can eithter use the Badi method to set it hardly, or create a customer message to let SAP check it.
name of Badi DPR_FIN_GECCO_ATTR
code like following:
      ls_attribute-data_element     = space.
      ls_attribute-value            = '1000'.
      ls_attribute-field_name_orext = 'BUKRS'.
      ls_attribute-fldname_receiver = space.
      ls_attribute-struc_name_copa = space.
      ls_attribute-field_name_copa = space.
      ls_attribute-ext_attr_name    = space.
      ls_attribute-ext_attr_value   = space.
      INSERT ls_attribute INTO TABLE ct_attributes.
regards!
Zhenbo

Problem in Accounting Integration in cProjects 4.0

Hi,
I am trying to customize the Accounting Integration in cProjects 4.0 with R/3. The problem comes when I try to replicate the Cost/Revenue rates to the R/3 system. I get the following error: "<i>Cost/revenue rate PM01: organizational unit 40000582 does not exist</i>"
The "organizational unit" is set in the cost/revenue rate as organization responsible. Why is that error poping up? Where can I create those organization responsibles? Do I have to create the data in my R/3 system?
Thanks in advance!
Best regards,

Thank you very much for your info, but I am still having the same trouble.
Apart form the former one I got two more customizing problems:
The point "Make settings in ERP systems" returns in an error
In the point Define Controlling Scenario in R/3 I don't have to option to choose Multilevel Controlling (can I customize those options?)
Thanks again,
Best regards,

Cproject 3.1 accounting integration project problem

Dear Sirs,
I have some problems with accounting integration in cProjects. I got help previously with missing company code in thread; This is now implemented and works fine.
When I save a project and mark it for replication, i get the following error in the Cockpit for Controlling Integration (cprojects).
Enter Order number.
Message no. KO413
I have been looking and looking for ways to solve this; Any hints from you guys?
Best regards,
Jørgen

Hello Thorsten,
you are quite right. We tried to swap to internal number range this morning, and it makes the error message to change to:
+Company code is not defined:
Messsage no. F5165
Diagnosis
Colmpany code "" has not been created in finacial accounting
System response
System error
Procedure
Correct the entry or create the company code using financial accounting customizing functions.+
This is quite strange given we have implemented the badi for company code (DPR_FIN_GECCO_ATTR), with the correct values.
Any hints are highly appricated, personally is wonder if there are other places we can look for more detailed error messages to find out excactly what goes wrong.
Best regards,
Jørgen

CProjects 4.0 - SAP R/3 4.7 - Accounting Integration problem.

Dear all,
I have performed all steps necesaary for accounting integration in cProjects and SAP R/3 FI System.
I can even see and assign the cost rate that I have created in cProjects to a project role.
System also calculates the cost for the role multiplyin the cost rate with the number of hours the resource has been assigned.
However, it also displays the following warning messages:
1. An error occurred in Accounting (system QASCLNT777)
2. Function module "IAOM_CPRO_MISC_RFC_CPDEF_CHECK" not found.
3. No cost center could be determined for organizational unit 00000000
4. Maintain a revenue element for cost/revenue rate ZZ_000001
5. Error occurred in accounting - check the costing in the ERP system
When I execute the transaction COCPCPR in R/3 system, I cannot see the internal order, but see the project name under "Internal Orders not created"
Regards,
Reema.

Hi reema, if we refer to the documentation pertaining to accounting integration for cProjects 4.0, we see that the prerequisities is ECC 6.0
Please see below from the help documentation
Integration
To be able to use the functions of accounting integration, you have to implement the Internal Orders (CO-OM-OPA) application component and Project System (PS) in SAP ECC 6.0.
Prerequisites
You need to make a number of Customizing settings in both the Collaboration Projects and SAP ECC Implementation Guides (IMG):
Settings in the Collaboration Projects IMG
You selected the Controlling in mySAP ERP setting in Customizing for Collaboration Projects under Connection to External Systems ® Accounting Integration ® Activate Integration as the Accounting Integration Scenario.
I feel the error messages are thrown because you are using SAP R/3 4.7. I see from the SAP notes, for CATS integration with cProjects 4.0 and SAP R/3, SAP consulting is available, but nothing is mentioned for accounting integration.

Is Verizon unwilling or unable to fix problem with Account Owner(s)

A forum or Google search reveals several customers unhappy with how Verizon treats the account owners... count me as one. I'm sure there are many more customers who were equally unhappy but just accept Verizon's incompetence and complete the unnecessary gymnastics of un-registering accounts and then re-registering with a new username.
PROBLEM:
There are numerous scenarios that can cause a My Verizon account to have the Account Owner be listed with an incorrect telephone number. In my case, I had an account with AT&T and 3 additional numbers associated. As each account expired, I transferred the numbers to Verizon. The first account transferred was my 14yr old son. I registered a My Verizon account for management (my name & my userid) and eventually added the additional numbers, however, the Account Owner's phone number is listed as my son's cell.
Over the past 2 years (since I migrated to Verizon), I've had small problems with account notifications and other information being text to my son's cell. I've called numerous times and customer service says it's corrected, but eventually the problems return. Recently, I upgraded my phone and started using some new services like Backup Assistant and the fact that the Account Owner is associated with an incorrect number has caused even more trouble.
I simply want to keep my existing username for My Verizon and correct the cell phone number associated as the Account Owner. This should be extremely simple.
VERIZON'S SOLUTION:
"We can't do it". "Our systems don't allow us to make this change".
The Customer Service Department (or Lack of Customer Service Department) tells me that since they can't or are unwilling to do the necessary changes, their only solution is to force their customer to do their work. They will un-register the account and I can register again. There is no concern for the preferences of an existing customer (almost 3 years); there is no concern for the inconvenience caused to an existing customer who spends hundreds of dollars each month and thousands of dollars each year (I currently have 2 separate accounts with Verizon, 4 phones on my problem account and 4 phones on another for a total of 8 phones with data plans... do the math); there is no concern that I will now have to use a completely different username one that is no longer uniform with my other accounts; there is no concern that I will have to change any and all services that reference My Verizon. Quite simply... Verizon Wireless shows their Account Owners that they have no concern for us.
PROPER SOLUTION:
I have almost 25 years of Information Technology experience and over 3 years working with Call Centers (similar to Verizon's Customer Service), which explains in part why I find this so frustrating... the fix for this is SIMPLE!!! The real problem is that Verizon simply doesn't care enough to fix it because we are existing customers and not new customers.
Without going into specifics (nor could I since I don't have access to their systems), data for the My Verizon portal is contained within modifiable databases. These relational databases will be tied to other systems and other databases, but a modification of this type would just require that the portal be allowed to make the update to the appropriate field(s) within the appropriate database(s). If direct access is not attainable because of their design, it is still not too difficult to write an additional process to accommodate this change. These types of things are done everyday.
More importantly, even if Verizon was unable or unwilling to make these programming changes... I have no doubt that if Customer Service has an escalation process to their I.T. Department that a programmer with access to the application(s) and/or database(s) could easily make the change directly and almost immediately.
CONCLUSION:
Until now, my experience with Verizon has been mostly positive even to the point of recommending the carrier to friends and family. I've found their coverage area to meet my needs and the data speeds to be more than satisfactory. However, Verizon needs to remember that cellular service has essentially become a commodity and that customer retention is often based on other things than simply providing dial tone. With a monthly cell phone expense that rivals a car payment, I would think that Verizon would be more than willing to accommodate such a simple request to maintain a satisfied customer.
If you too are one of the many customers having issue with modifying the Account Owner, just resolve yourself that it appears Verizon is unwilling to make the simple correction to the My Verizon portal to satisfy our request.

I'm not 100% sure that I follow your reasoning, so please correct me if I misstate your opinions. I've numbered them so it will be easier to identify any mistakes I make.
1. Not allowing a user, customer service representative, or any Verizon representative to change the cell phone number associated with the Account Owner to another cell phone number on the same account is a security risk.
I'm not suggesting that I be allowed to change the name, social security number, or any other pertinent details related to establishing the original account. All the information pertaining to who is responsible for the bill remains the same with the single exception that the current associated cell phone number be changed to another number already listed on the account. In what possible manner is this a security risk? Frankly if the ability was enabled and someone either by mistake or incompetence made such a change the impact would simply be what I'm currently experiencing (inconvenience). Since in this hypothetical situation the ability to change this value is enabled, the "inconvenience" would easily be re-mediated by returning the value to its original state.
Furthermore, if there is some "security risk" that I'm over looking then an organization that is concerned about providing quality customer service would create procedures to accommodate customer requests and meet security requirements. Let's use a bank (with an obvious security vulnerability) and debit cards as an example. If I lose my debit card, I cannot go to my computer and print out a temporary debit card (very user friendly, but not secure). Some banks will allow you to go online and cancel the lost debit card while requesting a new one to be mailed to the address you have on file (user friendly and mostly secure). To solve this same problem at other banks might require you to go into the office and sign a form cancelling the lost debit card and confirming the address to mail you a new one (less user friendly, but highly secure). The Verizon equivalent, is me requesting that I add an existing bank account to my online banking and being told "We can't do it". However, because the bank cares so much about keeping me as a customer... they will delete my account, allow me to create another, possibly losing my historical data, have me change my username that I've been using for years, spend time adding all my online bill payments... all for the pleasure of staying their customer and getting to use their services as they should have been designed.
2. Making a software change that would allow users or CSR's to associate a different cell phone number on the account to the current Account Owner would be difficult and require downtime.
You give some time expounding this thought and I'm unaware of your web, application, and/or database experience... but I will try to address your concerns later. However, let's assume that you are correct and these changes will be difficult ("taking weeks to months"). The purpose of my post was whether Verizon was unwilling or unable to accommodate this customer request. You seem to be agreeing that Verizon is unwilling to make these changes, or at the very least, feel that Verizon has decided that the time and expense involved is of more importance than correcting an issue impacting their customers. I personally find the later equally disheartening as this has been an issue for many customers (you yourself mention experiencing the problem) and has been well documented through previous forum and Internet posts. Even by your estimations, if they had taken previous customer complaints seriously... this would have been fixed by now. Once again it seems the obvious answer is that Verizon may not consider customer service as an important factor as I do.
As far as your technology issues, I agree that more than a web page change would be required. I do take issue with comparing the change of a distributed application (operating system) that must be designed to support enumerable hardware components to the work required to makes changes to a web portal with a back-end in-house database. You could write an entire book detailing the differences between these two scenarios as they have very little in common, but I'll try to keep it focused to your points.
Coding
Coding an Operating System that must run on literally a multitude of hardware configurations and support an unending diversity of applications is an incredible endeavor and really never a finished product. Changes to an OS are constantly being made and the developers must consider hardware and software that they are not intimately familiar and occasionally even deal with 3rd parties to facilitate changes.
The change I'm advocating has a web component which would be replicated throughout their web server topology, however, these are items that Verizon's developers deal with routinely (if not daily). There are a very limited number of 3rd party concerns (a few different browsers, IE, Chrome, Mozilla & a disparate platforms such as PC, tablet, phone). A little research in the benefits of web portals (and cloud computing) verses distributed applications will clearly outline the drastic differences. A simple illustrative question (though maybe not a completely fair analogy) is how many people do you know who can code an operating system and how many people get on GoDaddy and create their own web pages. I'm not trying to insinuate that anyone who knows a little HTML can make the web portal changes, however, this isn't a difficult project for an experienced developer.
The bigger issues and ones that I alluded to in my original post are the changes that would be required to Verizon's back-end databases. The changes that would need to be made mostly likely involve multiple databases and assuming they are using a typical relational database design might require changes to key fields, adding new databases/tables, and exhaustive integrity checks. This isn't something that an average user could sit down and accomplish in an hour, however, these are simply the routine day-to-day duties of any professional database developer.
Again I reiterate... this change simply involves allowing someone (either a user, CSR, or other Verizon agent) to readily change an index record or records that correlates Account Owner to cell phone number. In terms of database management this should be simple.
Debugging & Deployment
The debugging/testing of changes made to an Operating System are amazingly complex for all the aforementioned reasons. The deployment of such changes is even more complex in that you've got to develop the mechanism to push these changes out to the entirety of the user community. I'll address deployment (or as you said dispersal) of this change because it's the easiest... quite simply there isn't one. The benefit of having a centralized web portal like My Verizon is that users come to you, not the other way around, and any change made will immediately be accessible by the user community. There is a deployment aspect in that My Verizon doesn't exist on a single web server, but again this is just the typical topology for a portal of this size and not relevant to our discussion. Debugging/Testing is an important aspect of any change and certainly Verizon has this methodology in place, however, I'll reiterate that this change should not be complex and shouldn't require extensive testing. We've also already discussed the fact that any debugging/testing only has to take place on a limited number of platforms.
Downtime
If adding the ability to change the relationship of the Account Owner to an associated cell phone number requires any downtime... the person responsible for Verizon's Development, Beta, and Production environments should be fired. There is simply no way this is even a possible concern. I've dealt with many companies with far less resources than Verizon and I assure you that changes of this nature would never require down time. I'm sure they have staff in place whose sole responsibility is to work on their continuity plan. This is a non issue.
Other Carriers
You can't possibly know how all carriers operate, though you may have some past experience with other companies. I would contend (and maybe I'm too optimistic) that a company with a focus on customer satisfaction when made aware of complaints and/or limitations in their service would seek to rectify the issue. It's quite possible that whatever other company you are referencing has fixed this issue if indeed it was similar... especially since I've hopefully bolstered my opinion that the resolution is not overly complicated.
Would you mind telling me if you deleted your 2 original comments to my post before I had an opportunity to answer? The reason I ask is that last night another user (jimfitzgerald) had posted a comment and I replied. He later posted a 2nd comment and while writing my response... all the posts were removed (his 2 posts, my reply, and your 2 posts). I'm curious if this was just a user withdrawal (though I really wish my response had remained in the thread), if there was some sort of technical issue with these forums last night, or if my response was deleted for cause by Verizon or other admin. Thanks!

Cproject problems with accounting settings

Hi all,
*I am not sure if someone can help me.*
*I am using cProjects suite 4.5, when I create a project ( in cproject) error message 'The settings for accounting integration contain errors' Message no. DPR_FIN_GECCO004 appears and the accounting tab is empty.*
*I am not sure where can be the problem, I have reviewed cproject configuration and I think it is correct.*
*Does anyone have a configuration guide? or at least may someone tell me what he has configued at this point IMG --> collaboration project -->Conection to external system -->Object link in sap system --> Make settings for calling a sap transaction -->Alias for the web server of a SAP transaction ?*
*Thank you very much for your help.*

Hi,
1.First define the cost/revenue rates used in costing.
2. Second imp activity is replicate cost revenue rates to R/3 system. if you using same system give RFC destination NONE. otherwise use your target system available to you. take help of basis if u dont know traget system. Activity given below when u replication cost revenue rates.
Activities
Enter the replication line and specify which rates you want to replicate under Selections.
If you do not specify a selection, all rates are replicated.
If you want to replicate the records only partially, and you do not want to post them in the target system, set the Test Run indicator.
After test run sucessful, plz uncheck that test rum box and replicate.
Thanks
Amit
note: award points for useful answer

Internal Order not being created in cProjects-Accounting Integration

Dear All,
We are working on cProjects 4.0 with ECC 6.0,
Trying to do Accounting Integration.
For only one Project I am able to create Internal Order,
But I am getting following error.
Cost/revenue rate YP002 is not valid in organization 00000000
Inspite of assigning these rates to the organization 00000000
For other projects, when I click on accounting:
I get following error
"Single-Obj.Controlling on InternalOrders 0188993B3E343947A046B554FD886E03 000006000032 does not exist"
When I go to Controlling Cockpit, I see this Internal Order not being created.
Have revisited all settings, project type, etc.
How do I go about this.
Kindly help,
Navendu

Dear All,
I was able to solve the one of the problem, with the following settings,
Assign Cost Elements & Activity Types:
Choose Organization, Start & End Dates, Cost and Revenue Elements, Currency.
The start and end date of the cost/ revenue did not fall within the start and end date of the Organization.
Regards,
Navendu Shirali

DPR_FIN_GECCO004 "The settings for Accounting integration contain errors"

Hi all,
I have the same trouble with Accounting Integration in new project:
Cproject problems with accounting settings
But this links isn't solve my problem. I've checked all following customizing in cProjects from detailed info from Message no. DPR_FIN_GECCO004:
1) Did you assign an object type to the project type for communicating with the accounting system? (See the IMG activity Make General Settings).
I've used predefined standard:
- object type: Single-Obj. Controlling on WBS Elements (0FIN_INT_ERP_PS)
- frame: 0FRAME9
- no costing: empty
- revenue calc type: Use costs/revenue rates from cProjects
2) Does this object type have the proxy class CL_DPR_OLR3_GECCO (for single-object controlling on internal orders) or CL_DPR_OLR3_WBSELEMENT (for single-object controlling on WBS elements)? (See the IMG activity Define Object Types for Object Links).
Yes, proxy class is correct (CL_DPR_OLR3_WBSELEMENT).
But I'm not sure that object type is active. I've viewed table V_DPR_OBL_OBTYP and the field Active is empty for this object type (0FIN_INT_ERP_PS)
Besides, I can't see this object type (0FIN_INT_ERP_PS) in the following setting:
SPRO -> ... -> Structures -> Define Object Types for Object Links (from message)
But I can see it here:
SPRO -> ... -> Connection to External Systems -> Accounting Integrations -> Define Object Links for Accounting Integration
Is it correct?
3) Has an RFC destination been entered in this object type? (See the IMG activity Define Object Types for Object Links).
Yes, but not in this setting (see point 2).
4) Have you chosen a suitable setting for confirmation with regards to 'Time Recording for' in the project type so that it matches the integration scenario? (See the IMG activity Define Project Types.) For example, time recording for roles is not permitted in a structure-based scenario.
My setting is: 'Time Recording for' - Tasks
Is anybody knows a solution of this trouble???

In the target R/3 system COCPCPR shows a lot of messages like this:
Object not known in CO
Message no. IAOM028
Diagnosis
You want to post to the object with technical key E002D524BF9325F1A9D3001A4BE638F6 belonging to business scenario cProjects. However, there is no Controlling object assigned to this object.
System Response
Processing stopped.
Procedure
Example:
You bill an order item in an external system and transfer the billing document to R/3 Accounting. An error occurs when the CO account assignment is determined, since the order item is not yet assigned to a Controlling object. The error occurs either when the order item is transferred to R/3, or while the transferred order item is being processed: Check the transfer log for the order item in the external system, and start the transfer of the order item again. Then start the transfer of the billing document to R/3 Accounting again.

The settings for accounting integration contain errors

The settings for accounting integration contain errors
Message no. DPR_FIN_GECCO004
System Response
The accounting functions are not available.
Procedure
Check the following in Customizing for Collaboration Projects:
Did you assign an object type to the project type for communicating with the accounting system? See the IMG activity Make General Settings.
Does this object type have the proxy class CL_DPR_OLR3_GECCO (for single-object controlling on internal orders) or CL_DPR_OLR3_WBSELEMENT (for single-object controlling on WBS elements)? See the IMG activity Define Object Types for Object Links.
Has an RFC destination been entered in this object type? See the IMG activity Define Object Types for Object Links.
In the project type did you choose the confirmation setting regarding 'Time Recording for' to match the integration scenario? See the IMG activity Define Project Types. For example, time recording for a role is not permitted in a structure-based scenario.
All the steps mentioned in the in the above error have been verfied and are correct but the error is still existing. Is there anything that I am missing here?

Hi SAP USER123 ,
Actually the description of the messages should the reason of the problem. Please double check the settings again one by one.
If the problem still remains, you can open a customer message for help.
Kind regards
Zhenbo

C Project Accounting integration

Hi all,
Pls help me come out of this accounitng integration problem in cprojects.
The object type 0FIN_INT_ERP_PS is not appearing in Define Object types Node. Instead I have one object type as 0FIN_INT_PROJ , but his is not helping. and also this is greyed out.
I wish to create WBS automatically from C projects.
0FIN_INT_ERP_PS object type is what is specified in settings as Single-Obj. Controlling on WBS Elements as object links for accounting integration with Destination as NONE and proxy class as CL_DPR_OLR3_WBSELEMENT.
Thanks
Rajeev
In case of any documentation pls send me to [email protected]

Hi Rajeev ,
Where you chek this object type link,
-->0FIN_INT_ERP_PS
-->0FIN_INT_SOC_R3
both are come defult
Please check the path and revert back
SPRO ---> Collrabration Project
                         --->Conection to Exteranl System
> Acoounting Integration
                                            --> Define object link to Accounting Integration
Here you find the
-->0FIN_INT_ERP_PS
     proxy class:CL_R3_OLR3_PROJECTDEFINITION
-->0FIN_INT_SOC_R3
      proxy class:CL_R3_OLR3_INTERNAL_ORDER
Give the destinaion from which client your are getting the values of PS data or internal order.
thanks
sunil jawalkar
null

I have problem with account that i can't make update or buy from app store There is massage appear in my payment page that i must contact with i tunes support to complete this transaction Please help me to fixe this problem as soon possible Hany hassan 00

I have problem with account that i can't make update or buy from app store
There is massage appear in my payment page that i must contact with i tunes support to complete this transaction
Please help me to fixe this problem as soon possible
Hany hassan
0096597617317
0096596677186
Thank you

You need to Contact iTunes Support...
Apple Support iTunes Store Contact Us

Document for account integration with cProjects needed

hi all
can I get accounting integration document?
<b>mail id [email protected]</b>
we have cProject 4 and R/3 4.7 which we will be upgrading.
i want accounting tab in cProject.
so need documentation @ it
waiting with points!!
thanx a ton

I have sent it to your mail id.
p.s. reward points if you find it useful

"Travel Expense - cProjects" without accounting integration

Working with cProjects 4.0 (as a stand alone system), can I have time and effort captured against task of cProjects' project? I am looking for a scenario where a consultant assigned to a task in cProjects would capture time and also travel expense corresponding to that task (transport / boarding / lodging) expenses in CATS. Can this be done? Where can I retrieve this data from (table name)?
Accounting integration is not to be done. I am only looking for the manual entry of data from the consultant (resource) to be stored in some table in the system from which I can retrieve the data.

Hi Swayam,
Yes, the time capture can be done without the CO-Integration. If there is no co-integraion, the travel expense to cProjects is not possible, or make no sense.
If you are interested, there are two ways by CATS Integration, with and without co-integration.
Case A: without co integration.
1. Worklist (or timesheet?) in ERP will be generated according the cProject structure and custmoizing settings, which control, at which object can the confirmation done. Such worklist does not have a co object.
2. The user capture the time\efforts using CATS in ERP system.
3. the confirmed time\efforts are transfered back to the cProject system, and write in the involved cProject element.
Case B: with co-integration.
1. Worklist (or timesheet?) in ERP will be generated according
     - the cProject structure and
     - customizing settings, which control, at which object can the confirmation done
     - the assigned co-object of cProject elements.
    The worklist has a co object.
2. The user capture the time\efforts using CATS in ERP system.
3. the confirmed time\efforts are transfered back to the cProject system, and write in the involved cProject element.
4. The (actual) costs are booked at ERP system due to the co-object in worklist.
5. Additionally, the cProject evaluation can read the actual costs from ERP system and display it.
Kind regards,
Zhenbo

Problem in accessing integration builder tool of XI

Hi
i am having problem in accessing integration builder tool of XI system , when i enter the user credentials it is getting hanged
can any body please help me with this
thanks and regards
Pendyala

Hi,
check whether your xi server is working fine or is it down. If you are not able to open the integration builder, what is the exact error message you are getting.
How are you trying to open your IB.
Are you able to login to SAPGUI for the XI client.
If so try to provide the tcode sxmb_ifr and check whether you are able to open the IB.
Reward points
Regards,
Nithiyanandam

Problems on Accounting Integration MLC

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for