Problems with auto upgrade Anyconnect 3.1

Hello,
I'm having problem with auto upgrade of Anyconnect 2.5 to 3.1.
Here is the situation :
I have ASA5510 running ASA 8.4.5 and clients are running Anyconnect 2.5.3055 and 3.1.00495 with 2 different profiles.
Clients with 2.5 can upgrade to 3.1 but then receive an "Invalid host entry" when they try to connect with new client. It works if they use FQDN instead of profiles. It's the same situation with Windows 7, Mac OS X and linux.
If I configure client software back to 2.5 on ASA, it works again for every client.
Do you have an idea ?
Thanks for your reply.
Yann

I have seen the same behavior on Mac OS X. A couple of points for me:
If I delete the profiles from /opt/cisco/anyconnect/profile then I can connect once (using the FQDN) but it then downloads the client profile and on next attempted connection it receives "invalid host entry." My profiles use the FQDN of my ASA and both forward and reverse DNS resolution are configured properly.
My workaround is to remove the AnyConnect Client Profile entirely, but I can get away with that because I have a very simple setup, with all users in one default group. If I had to pass different profile information to different users that would not be a solution.
Second, better workaround: I just exported the client profile, imported it under a different name, edited the new client profile to remove the server address, and assigned the new profile to the group policy. At their next login, users get all the profile settings and since the client remembers the FQDN they used to connect it doesn't adversely affect the user experience.

Similar Messages

I want to upgrade from Tiger to Snow Leopard on my 2008 MacPro. How do I avoid problems with the upgrade process?

I want to upgrade from Tiger to Snow Leopard on my 2008 MacPro. How do I avoid problems with the upgrade process?

#1 Do a complete bootable backup of your drive before upgrading. That way should anything happen you can revert back to the start and try again.
Make sure you meet Snow Leopard 10.6 Technical Requirements - http://support.apple.com/kb/SP575
You might also want to make sure you don't have software issues with SL:
A Mac OS X 10.6 Snow Leopard Application Compatibility List - http://snowleopard.wikidot.com/

Mail has problem with auto address.

My mail recently has had a problem with auto addressing. Sometimes it fills in the address, at other times it will not. I have checked mail preferences often...making sure auto-address is on. I CAN use the address book to click on an address when auto addressing doesn't work. Mail is also quirky about quitting and sometimes preferences have to be re-edited to send. Basically, it is behaving badly. What to do? Thanks ACE

My mail recently has had a problem with auto
addressing. Sometimes it fills in the address, at
other times it will not. I have checked mail
preferences often...making sure auto-address is on. I
CAN use the address book to click on an address when
auto addressing doesn't work. Mail is also quirky
about quitting and sometimes preferences have to be
re-edited to send. Basically, it is behaving badly.
What to do? Thanks ACE
Later...12/03. Autofill not working with mail or safari. Autofill icon, when touched says something like...autofill has no infomation. this is weird, since it had been working nicely for 2.5 years. I've tried everything I could think of. Need a pro's help...MNICE

Problem with AUTO PUBLISH nd update NEW POLICY to Client .

To : who may concern , which really need urgent help .
after few days of setting up the ZESM , but then i was unable to find is there any setting which can "AUTO PUBLISH " into the Client side . Without the Client need to use the manual "UPDATE POLICY " button ?
Because , we find it that to make it silent update without the CLIENT side need to manually click the UPDATE POLICY , so i would wonder is there any way to have the AUTO UPDATE the policy from SERVER side ?
thank alot first .
From : NX ( which this few days has been keep on try and explore the ZESM 3.5 , 4.0 , 4.1IR )
Which really need help in here , due to we are almost to the end of the setup server and the IT infrastructure .

I would recommend that you READ and UNDERSTAND the Installation and Administration guides from the Documentation (somebody took the job to write those, so be kind enough to read it)
Main Doc
http://www.novell.com/documentation/zesm41/
Your question is answered here:
http://www.novell.com/documentation/...a/bnk7bdx.html
See "Update Interval".
Lastly, this is a public support forum, served on a best-effort basis from the community. As such, there's no guarantee that you'll get an answer, and if you get one, that works and is correct. So, if you have un urgent or important issue, go ahead an open a support ticket with Novell Technical Services in order to be served by professional support engineers backed up by the engineers who wrote the code.
http://support.novell.com/contact/
>>>
From: nxgame<[email protected]>
To:novell.support.zenworks.endpoint-security-management
Date: 12/11/2010 3:06 pm
Subject: problem with AUTO PUBLISH nd update NEW POLICY to Client .
To : who may concern , which really need urgent help .
after few days of setting up the ZESM , but then i was unable to find
is there any setting which can "AUTO PUBLISH " into the Client side .
Without the Client need to use the manual "UPDATE POLICY " button ?
Because , we find it that to make it silent update without the CLIENT
side need to manually click the UPDATE POLICY , so i would wonder is
there any way to have the AUTO UPDATE the policy from SERVER side ?
thank alot first .
From : NX ( which this few days has been keep on try and explore the
ZESM 3.5 , 4.0 , 4.1IR )
Which really need help in here , due to we are almost to the
end of the setup server and the IT infrastructure .
nxgame
nxgame's Profile: http://forums.novell.com/member.php?userid=99703
View this thread: http://forums.novell.com/showthread.php?t=427947

Problems with auto-cap of I on ios6?

I upgraded my 4s to iOS6 and not my auto capitalization of "I" is not working. Anyone else have this problem or know how to fix it?

Yeah I tried making a shortcut to make i into I, but it has to be two characters. I guess I'll just go into the store tomorrow and see if anyone else has had problems with it with iOS6. I haven't heard that anyone has had any wonderful experiences with it yet

Problems with Mavericks upgrade?

Thinking about uprgrading to Mavericks, but have been coming across a lot of threads/reviews about people losing date and/or having real problems with the process. It's been a while since I've been here, and just wanted to ask for an opinion/advice. I'm using Snow Leopard 10.6.8. Should I stay away from it, or if I do, what advice/tips do you have for a smooth upgrade?
OR -- is it possible to get Mountian Lion Somewhere? I looked for it in the app store, but couldn't find it. I heard some negative reviews about Lion, so I just kept Snow Leopard, rather than take any chances with a new OS.

Mavericks is excellent on my MBP 8,2. Fast and flawless. Faster than Mountain Lion.
New features I like: iBooks, iCloud keychain, enhanced dictation.
A few things to consider:
Any new OS has some bugs and incompatibilities with old software and hardware. If you are uncomfortable with basic Mac troubleshooting, then perhaps waiting would be a better strategy. I didn't have any problems, with installation or after.
If you have any mission-critical software or peripherals, make sure they are compatible first. Check your apps for compatability here: RoaringApps - Application compatibility and feature support for OS X and iOS
Mavericks does not play well with some old/bad software and hardware:
Crapware: anything that purports to "clean", "monitor", "protect", or "accelerate" your mac. Unnecessary on Macs and often harmful. Examples: CleanMyMac and MacKeeper (the King of Crapware).
antivirus software. Unnecessary on Macs.
WD hard drives.
Before you install Mavericks:
backup your old system, either with Time Machine, or better yet, a bootable backup.
have enough RAM. The specs say 2GB, but 4 is probably a more realistic minimum.
uninstall Crapware, antivirus software, and any other junk you don't need.
repair your hard drive and permissions with Disk Utility
boot into safe mode, and then run the installer Mac OS X: What is Safe Boot, Safe Mode?
ML is available here: OS X Mountain Lion - Apple Store (U.S.)

Problems with Vista upgrade on Moduslink

'COA invalid', 'Irrecoverable Error', 'Alert not Implemented'... these are kind of messages I get from Moduslink. I'm not expecting to reply my emails since they are in neck-deep.
I love my A100 SAA9E, a very stable and powerful machine. I'm from London and have selected all the right options, but it would either come up with a random COA prob, or an error after my penultimate step.
What can I do? Help.
Shawn

I was unable to complete the Vista upgrade via the Moduslink on Toshiba's website http://wwww.toshiba-europe.com/vista-upgrade, even though I got to paying for the upgrade with my credit card. When my payment was being processed I got an 'unrecoverable error', so I went back to repeat the process and this time the site didn't recognize my COA on the bottom of the laptop.
I contacted Moduslink via the following Tel No. 00800 666 44 666 (UK) and spoke to one of their support staff (choose options 5 and then 8). There is a problem with their site excepting payments from credit or debit cards. The representative reset my COA, but it takes 48 hours for it to clear (so much from electronic data communications to servers). I have been told to retry the upgrade process again on Friday 16/02/2007, however, this time to pay either by wireless transfer from my bank or send a cheque.
Hopefully, this will help others who were frustrated with the Vista upgrade debacle. It would be more appropriate however, if the company concerned, Modulink, resolved the issue in the 1st place. Firstly by informing their customers that there was an issue, secondly on a work around to the problem and finally fixing the problem. Will commonsense ever prevail?
Ala (14/02/2007)
Message was edited by: Ala_Jackson

I could not see how to continue after upgrade to firefox 4. This has never been a problem with ast upgrades. I am finding Firefox to be very user unfriendly for non-tech people.

I am being told that my current version of firefox is no longer protected. When I tried to upgrade to firefox 4 some time ago, the menu bar(?) was gone--no bookmarks. I set my computer back to an earlier date to get my book marks back and have been afraid to attempt this upgrade again. Firefox also appears to have tried to do the upgrade automatically and says I have incompatible add-ons. I have never had problems with previous updates. I have read negative reviews of firefox 4 and am frankly afraid of it. I hate to leave firefox and am afraid of losing my book marks as well. I find the "Help" forums etc. here extremely difficult to navigate and they seem to be aimed at people who are more tech savy than many of us are.

#Firefox 3.5.19 which you are using is no longer supported and is not being updated for any issues, including security problems.
#The Menu Bar (File, Edit, View, History, Bookmarks, Tools, Help) was replaced in Firefox 4 by the "Firefox button" in the upper left corner
#*You can turn the Menu Bar back on by doing one of the following in Firefox 4:
#**click Firefox button, click Options, click Menu Bar to select it
#**HOLD down the ALT key while pressing the keyboard letters VTM
#**right-click on an empty space in the Navigation Toolbar, then click Menu Bar to select it.
#Some information about Firefox 4 changes:
#*https://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/features/
#*there is a link "watch the video" under '''''Improved Interface''''' on the above page
#You can make Firefox 4 look more like prior versions: http://www.computertechtips.net/64/make-firefox-4-look-like-ff-3-6/
Your bookmarks should be safe during the upgrade; they are in a separate place on your hard drive. You should keep them backed-up in case of any problems with your system. See:
*https://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/Backing%20up%20your%20information#w_backing-up-your-profile
*http://kb.mozillazine.org/Profile_backup
*http://kb.mozillazine.org/Profile_folder_-_Firefox

Problems with auto-enroll with the certificate expiration

Hello,
we have routers that work with certificates. We have problems with the auto-enroll when the certificates go to expire.
?Can somebody help?
I can send mor debug o configurations.
We attach a debug.
Very thanks

Hello,
I attach the debug.
Very thanks

Problem with PRD upgrade from 4.6C to ECC 6.0

Hello,
I'm experiencing a problem with our live Productive system, and hoping for some ideas on how to resolve. First, we have successfully upgraded our DEV and QA environment, and are now upgrading PRD. I was successful in getting through the uptime SAPup of our downtime minimized upgrade. Note that I did not need to log into the Shadow instance at all, because all modifications will be transported from DEV during downtime.
However, I did want to log into the Shadow instance to take a look at it. I first had to start the instance in the SAP Management console, and then when I attempted to access via the SAPGUI, I recieved error "Internal TSKH error. Session terminated". Also, I noticed that as soon as I started up the Shadow instance, I am now getting "SYSTEM_CANT_CLEAR" short dumps every minute. Error says: Error when initializing the work area "SYST".
Since I don't need to log into the Shadow instance to complete the upgrade, I'm not sure if this is going to be an issue for me or not while I complete the upgrade.
Any assistance would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you,
Leeanna Travis

Hello,
I'm experiencing a problem with our live Productive system, and hoping for some ideas on how to resolve. First, we have successfully upgraded our DEV and QA environment, and are now upgrading PRD. I was successful in getting through the uptime SAPup of our downtime minimized upgrade. Note that I did not need to log into the Shadow instance at all, because all modifications will be transported from DEV during downtime.
However, I did want to log into the Shadow instance to take a look at it. I first had to start the instance in the SAP Management console, and then when I attempted to access via the SAPGUI, I recieved error "Internal TSKH error. Session terminated". Also, I noticed that as soon as I started up the Shadow instance, I am now getting "SYSTEM_CANT_CLEAR" short dumps every minute. Error says: Error when initializing the work area "SYST".
Since I don't need to log into the Shadow instance to complete the upgrade, I'm not sure if this is going to be an issue for me or not while I complete the upgrade.
Any assistance would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you,
Leeanna Travis

TS1717 are there problems with iTunes upgrading from Vista to Windows 7?

are ther problems upgrading iTunes from Vista to Windows 7?

The best method is to use Windows Easy Transfer first to backup all your data, and do custom clean install. And install all your apps and drivers afterwards.
Yes it should work. Make sure you are ready, and have all the latest drivers and applications ahead of time.
There are some "gottchas" with the upgrade from Vista.

Problems with license upgrade on AIP-SSM

Hi guys:
I have a problem with my AIP-SSM, recently I download the latest license and I need to install in my AIP but when I try to do this I receive this error:
"errSystemError-idsPackageMgr: digital signature of the update file was not valid, use CCO to replace corrupted file"
So I download the license again, because maybe was corrupted, but I receive the same error at the time I want to install it.
Does anybody knows what this error means?
Regards

It sounds like you are attempting to install a .lic license-key file via the Update Sensor section (which is used for software upgrades/updates instead). If you are trying to install a .lic license-key file, you can do that from IDM or IME's Configuration > Sensor Management > Licensing section. Ensure the Update From: option is set to License File, then click the Browse Local… button and locate/select the .lic license-key file on your local client machine. Finally, click the Update License button to upload and install the license-key file onto the sensor.
If you try to install a .lic license-key file via the Update Sensor section, then you will encounter the error message you noted.

Problems with Auto approval workflow (WS 10000060) for shopping carts

Hi SAP Network community,
I have got a problem with the auto approval workflow for shopping carts.
Basically the workflow approves the shopping cart once it was created.
But then the related Purchase Order remains in Status held. If the PO gets ordered manually then it is not transferred to the R/3 backend system.
For testing purposes also the one step approval workflow was activated. If the shopping cart gets approved by clicking into the detail approval screen (not by approving through the green tick box in the shopping cart overview) then the PO gets ordered and transferred to the backend system as normal.
But if the shopping cart gets approved by using the green tick box in the shopping cart overview then the same problem occurs as described for the auto approval workflow.
The system version is SRM 4.00
Did anybody have the same or similar problems with the auto approval workflow and what could be the reason for this problems.
Thanks in advance,
Robert

Hi
Which SRM Workflow Scenario are you using (IS it Item level workflow or Shopping cart level Workflow) ?
Are you using customized SRM Business workflow or Standard SRM Workflow ?
<u>Please go through these links as well.</u>
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/2c/e68d406b305537e10000000a1550b0/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/eb/289f4099852e54e10000000a1550b0/frameset.htm
Incase you are using Standard SRM Workflow, please raise an Customer OSS message with SAP at the earliest.
Regards
- Atul

Problems with RAM upgrade iMac G5 1.8GHz

Stuck - Need Help!
I've previously upgraded up iMac to 2 500Mb RAMs and felt recently that it needed that little bit extra, so I ordered two 1Gb chips from crucial.
Followed instructions to T, but with the two new chips in, the machine won't load.
Interestingly, it boots up with the following RAM combinations
old 500MB + new 1GB (in any combination) - recognised as 1.5GB
one new 1GB RAM (again either one) - recognised as 1GB
I spoke to crucial who said that as the RAMs work individually, there isn't a problem with them, it could be a Firmware issue. I've upgraded all my software, and don't know what to do next?
Anyone overcome a similar problem in the past?
Thanks

I'm experiencing something very similar to shaow. I'll share my experience in gory details - sorry for the long post but I've spent more hours trying to stabilize. I should have worked the hours at walmart and bought a new iMac with the money I could have earned
Anyway, here goes:
Two iMac G5 1.8Ghz 17" (both Fall 2005 model), will call one A and the other B.
Prior to attempting ram upgrade: A, config working fine: both a config using 1GB slot 1, 256MB slot 2 and a single 1 PC3200 1GB stick. OS X 10.4-10.5.7. No problems. I did have the motherboard replaced under warranty after having sleep problems - capacitors were expanded. No problems since that motherboard swap.
Prior to attempting ram upgrade: B, config working fine: 2 x 256MB sticks. OS X 10.3.9
Ordered 3 PC3200 400Mhz 1GB sticks from Data Memory Systems.
Upgraded A: Added 1GB stick = 2GB total
Upgraded B: Removed both 256MB sticks from B and added two 1GB sticks = 2GB total
Booted B, experienced gray screen of death with the multi-language crash message - somethign like: 'Please hold down the power button and restart'. Power cycled B, booted off a retail box DVD of OS X 10.5.6. Began upgrade to 10.5.6. Gray screen of death part way thru upgrade. Power cycled, gray screen of death again during early boot phase.
Decided to run tests on B. I could not locate the Apple Hardware Test (neither on system dvd 1 nor on a separate DVD). I resorted to using TechnoTools Deluxe which was included with AppleCare box. No hardware problems found including on the 2GB memory.
Removed both new 1GB sticks, pulled older working 1GB stick from A and installed into B. Completed upgrade with just 1GB memory on B to 10.5.6 and subsequently pulled down all updates for OS X 10.5.8. Powered down, added second 1GB stick to B, booted into 10.5.8 successfully. Repaired disk permissions, restarted. Began using applications, then after only about 5 minutes experienced gray screen of death. Powered down, removed new 1GB stick, replaced with one of the two remaining new 1GB sticks. Read about reseting PRAM/NVRAM. Followed steps to reset PRAM then decided to do the reset NVRAM within openfirmware. Started back up and logged into 10.5.8. Ran several applications - did not experience gray screen of death after about 20 minutes use. Have not had time for further tests on B yet.
Back to my saga with A (my original iMac G5 that was working fine with 1GB stick on 10.5.7):
Called Data Memory Systems and they sent me a replacement for the 'bad' 1GB stick.
While I was waiting for the new 1GB stick from DMS, I was struggling to get machine fully updated. Software Updater was failing with the weird network error (network was fine) and after following steps to troubleshoot, I backed up the user accounts and decided to reinstall OS X fresh from the 10.5.6 retail box (family license). Finally, I had OS X 10.5.8 all fully updated on the 1GB iMac G5 (A).
New memory arrived, installed 2nd 1GB stick. Booted up, immediately I got the gray screen of death. Restarted, booted up got about 5-15 minutes use then gray screen of death. Puzzled, I called DMS who said unlikely I got 2 bad sticks. They suggested I try memtest. So I did...
So on A, I first ran memtest from single user mode on the 2GB config. It crashed immediately with some 'Unexpected' error. Did not look like a memory error. I powered down, removed 2nd 1GB stick, and ran memtest from single user on the 1GB stick. Ran all tests 3x over a couple hours - no problems found. Retested after swapping the 1GB stick for the other. Both tested fine. Installed both sticks again and ran memtest all tests, one pass (didn't want another 6 hours lost) on the 2GB config, and all tests passed. Booted up and got gray screen of death - I don't recall if it was on bootup or after running but I ran fsck with no disk problems found, then restarted, logged in, ran disk utility to repair all permissions. Some repairs were made. Restarted A, reset PRAM and NVRAM again, booted successfully.
I haven't had much time to run extensively apps on A yet. It's sleeping as I type this on another mac. My next test will be to reset SMU.
I'm starting to wonder if the original iMac G5 has firmware problems that would prevent it from being unstable with two 1GB sticks??? My experience on two identical models of iMac G5 plus reading this post with VERY similar behaviors and after all the normal tests. I've concluded the memory is A-OK and something more sinister is lurking...
Any thoughts are appreciated.

Aperture 3 : recurring quality problems with "auto levels"

Hello all,
I've been using Aperture 3 since the day of its release, and I have recurring problems with the quality of the "auto levels" output, compared to plain old Photoshop CS3. Auto-levels in Aperture 3 frequently output grainy results.
Here are some samples (look at the central vertical darker part of the image) :
— original image (well, part of it) shot using my Canon EOS 400D :
http://plainsong.online.fr/aperture/Original.jpg
— the same original image with "auto levels" applied in Photoshop CS3 :
http://plainsong.online.fr/aperture/Auto-levels-Photoshop.jpg
— the same original image with "auto levels" applied in Aperture 3.0.1 :
http://plainsong.online.fr/aperture/Auto-levels-Aperture.jpg
And here are both "auto-levelled" images zoomed in for convenience's sake :
http://plainsong.online.fr/aperture/Auto-levels-Photoshop-ZOOM.jpg
http://plainsong.online.fr/aperture/Auto-levels-Aperture-ZOOM.jpg
I would like to know if I'm the only one to get such crappy results in Aperture, on a not insignificant number of photos. These poor results are very visible in some photos. This is really irritating, because this lack of quality means I have to open those images in Photoshop just to apply auto-levels. And I thought Aperture would be smart enough to spare me those round-trips!
(By the way I've never had this kind of quality problems in Photoshop.)
Please share your experience. Thanks!

Here is another example :
http://plainsong.online.fr/aperture/Example2.jpg
Aperture auto-levels seem to choke on dark areas. Will we be obliged to bright and sunny shots ?

Problems with auto upgrade Anyconnect 3.1

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for